Factors Driving the Carbon Mineralization Priming Effect in a Sandy Loam Soil Amended with Different Types of Biochar
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Solid Earth, 5, 585–594, 2014 www.solid-earth.net/5/585/2014/ doi:10.5194/se-5-585-2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Factors driving the carbon mineralization priming effect in a sandy loam soil amended with different types of biochar P. Cely1, A. M. Tarquis2,3, J. Paz-Ferreiro1, A. Méndez4, and G. Gascó1 1Departamento de Edafología. E.T.S.I. Agrónomos. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28004 Madrid, Spain 2CEIGRAM, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28004 Madrid, Spain 3Departamento de Matemática aplicada a la Ingeniería Agronómica. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain 4Departamento de Ingeniería de Materiales. E.T.S.I. Minas. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/Ríos Rosas no. 21, 28003 Madrid, Spain Correspondence to: G. Gascó ([email protected]) Received: 1 March 2014 – Published in Solid Earth Discuss.: 15 March 2014 Revised: 22 May 2014 – Accepted: 22 May 2014 – Published: 30 June 2014 Abstract. The effect of biochar on the soil carbon mineral- 1 Introduction ization priming effect depends on the characteristics of the raw materials, production method and pyrolysis conditions. The goal of the present study is to evaluate the impact of three different types of biochar on physicochemical properties and Biochar is a carbonaceous material obtained from biomass CO2 emissions of a sandy loam soil. For this purpose, soil pyrolysis or gasification processes. Biochar production emits was amended with three different biochars (BI, BII and BIII) carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, but combined at a rate of 8 wt % and soil CO2 emissions were measured with proper waste disposal or biofuel production it offers a for 45 days. BI is produced from a mixed wood sieving from practical way of mitigating global warming (Barrow, 2012). wood chip production, BII from a mixture of paper sludge For many years now, it has been researched as a significant and wheat husks and BIII from sewage sludge. Cumulative means of improving soil productivity, carbon storage, and CO2 emissions of biochars, soil and amended soil were well the filtration of soil percolating water (Lehmann and Joseph, fit to a simple first-order kinetic model with correlation coef- 2009). In fact, land degradation is a worldwide phenomenon ficients (r2) greater than 0.97. Results show a negative prim- that affects soil quality, water resources, human societies ing effect in the soil after addition of BI and a positive prim- and economic development (Zhao et al., 2013; Omutu et al., ing effect in the case of soil amended with BII and BIII. 2014). Biochar as a source of organic matter (Paz Ferreiro These results can be related to different biochar properties and Fu, 2014) can improve the quality of soils in crop and such as carbon content, carbon aromaticity, volatile matter, rangeland (Yan-Gui et al., 2013) and then the development fixed carbon, easily oxidized organic carbon or metal and of societies (Srinivasarao et al., 2014) and reduce the impact phenolic substance content in addition to surface biochar of climate change (Barbera et al., 2013). properties. Three biochars increased the values of soil field Nowadays, biochar production is attracting more attention capacity and wilting point, while effects over pH and cation because it is a safer method of organic waste management. exchange capacity were not observed. Many types of biomass can be transformed into biochar, in- cluding wood wastes, crop residues, switch grass, wastew- ater sludge or deinking sludges (Méndez et al., 2012; Paz- Ferreiro et al., 2014; Sohi et al., 2010). If enough farmers, larger agricultural enterprises, biofuel producers, and waste treatment plants established biochar production methods, it Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 586 P. Cely et al.: Factors driving the carbon mineralization priming effect could reduce CO2 emissions related to agriculture while im- et al., 2012). For example, Gascó et al. (2012) observed using proving soil productivity. thermal methods that there is a degradation of more complex Biochar is a highly recalcitrant organic material, with a structures after application of a sewage sludge biochar to a long-term stability in soil, which is on the scale of millen- Haplic Cambisol. The final chemical composition and phys- nia or longer (Kuzyakov et al., 2014). The response that soil ical properties of biochar, and thus its potential for having a exhibits to biochar addition has global consequences for car- positive or negative priming effect, depends on the character- bon cycling. Depending on the interaction between soil and istics of the raw materials, production method and pyrolysis biochar, the ecosystem could become a sink or source of car- conditions. Different studies has been performed in order to bon. study the influence of feedstock, production method and py- The term priming effect refers to increases or decreases rolisis temperature on biochar properties and uses (Calvelo in the mineralization of native soil organic matter due to the Pereira et al., 2011; Méndez et al., 2012; Zimmermann et al., addition of substrates and has been observed in many stud- 2011; Paz-Ferreiro et al., 2014). ies, both in the field and under laboratory conditions (Paz- In the present work, three different biochars were used Ferreiro et al., 2012; Zavalloni et al., 2009; Zimmerman et in order to study their influence on soil properties and CO2 al., 2011). While it is generally regarded that biochar addi- emissions. Biochars were obtained from pyrolysis of differ- tion results in a reduction in soil carbon emissions from the ent types of biomass: mixed wood sievings from wood chip soil, the fact is that the results are biochar and soil specific. production, paper sludge and wheat husks and sewage sludge Indeed, previous works have shown that there is no clear at temperatures between 500 and 620 ◦C using slow pyrolysis trend in CO2 emissions after biochar application. For exam- processes. ple, Zimmerman et al. (2011) found that carbon mineraliza- tion was generally less than expected (negative priming) for soils combined with biochars produced at high temperatures 2 Materials and methods (525 and 650 ◦C) and from hard woods, whereas carbon min- 2.1 Soil selection and characterization eralization was greater than expected (positive priming) for soils combined with biochars produced at low temperatures ◦ The selected soil was taken from the northeast of Toledo (250 and 400 C) and from grasses, particularly during the (Spain) and the soil was air-dried, crushed and sieved through early incubation stage and in soils of lower organic carbon a 2 mm mesh prior to analysis. The initial pH and electrical content. Luo et al. (2011) used biochar from plant residues conductivity (EC) were determined with a soil : water ratio and found during the first 13 days of incubation experiment : −1 ◦ of 1 2.5 (g m L ) using a Crison micro-pH 2000 (Thomas that biochar obtained at 350 C causes a large positive prim- et al., 1996) and a Crison 222 conductivimeter (Rhoades, ing effect, while biochar prepared at higher temperatures ◦ 1996) respectively. CEC was determined by NH4OAc/HOAc (700 C) caused a relatively small positive priming effect. at pH 7.0 (Sumner and Miller, 1996). Total organic matter These authors hypothesized that the priming effect was prob- (TOM) was determined using the dry combustion method ably caused by labile organic matter remaining in the biochar at 540 ◦C (Nelson and Sommers, 1996). Soil metal content after pyrolysis, which in turn activated the soil microorgan- was determined using a Perkin Elmer 2280 atomic absorption ism. Jones et al. (2011) hypothesized that the increment in spectrophotometer after sample extraction by digestion with soil respiration is due to a different mechanism than changes concentrated HCl/HNO3 following method 3051a (USEPA, in soil physical properties (bulk density, porosity, moisture); 1997). Soil texture was determined following the methodol- biological breakdown of organic carbon released from the ogy of Bouyoucos (1962). These analyses were performed in biochar; abiotic release of inorganic carbon contained in the triplicate. biochar and a stimulation of decomposition of soil organic matter. Zavalloni et al. (2011) have shown that the amount of 2.2 Biochar characterization soil carbon respired was similar between the control and soil treated with biochar from coppiced woodland pyrolysis in a Three different biochar samples were selected and used for short-term incubation experiment. Also, Wardle et al. (2008) the present work: biochar I (BI) was produced by Swiss reported a priming effect from a boreal soil after biochar Biochar (Lausanne, Switzerland) from mixed wood sievings addition, although the results of this experiment have been from wood chip production at 620 ◦C; biochar II (BII) was disputed by others (Lehmann and Sohi, 2008). If a strong produced by Sonnenerde (Austria) from a mixture of paper positive priming effect occurs after biochar addition to the sludge and wheat husks at 500 ◦C; and biochar III (BIII) was soil, then the beneficial effects attained by biochar addition to produced by Pyreg (Germany) from sewage sludge at 600 ◦C. the soil becomes mitigated. Furthermore, although the use of The pyrolisis duration was 20 min in all cases. All biochar biochar measuring soil respiration has been evaluated (Mén- samples were produced using Pyreg500-III pyrolysis (Ger- dez et al., 2012; Zimmerman et al., 2011), fewer studies have many) units that can work until 650 ◦C in a continuous pro- studied the role of biochar addition of native soil organic mat- cess. ter (Zimmermann et al., 2011; Cross and Sohi, 2011; Gascó Solid Earth, 5, 585–594, 2014 www.solid-earth.net/5/585/2014/ P. Cely et al.: Factors driving the carbon mineralization priming effect 587 The pH, EC, CEC and metal content in biochars were per- 2.4 Mineralization model formed as in Sect.