Lower Colorado River Watershed Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lower Colorado River Watershed Management Plan Lower Colorado River Watershed Management Plan Lower Colorado River Watershed Management Plan Prepared for Clean Colorado River Sustainability Coalition 2330 McCulloch Blvd N Lake Havasu City, Arizona 86403 Attn: Doyle Wilson Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants 114 North San Francisco Street, Suite 100 Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 (928)774-5500 www.swca.com SWCA Project No. 40291 September 2018 Lower Colorado River Watershed Management Plan i Lower Colorado River Watershed Management Plan Executive Summary The Lower Colorado River (LCR) Watershed includes the Havasu-Mohave Lakes and Imperial Reservoir hydrologic units that cover nearly 8,639 square miles of land south of Hoover Dam along the Colorado River mainstem in Arizona, California, and Nevada. In the planning area, highly regulated releases from Hoover Dam largely control the flow of the river for 260 miles south towards the United States–Mexico border. Several tributaries have the potential to affect water quality negatively in the LCR due to stormwater pollution runoff. Drought, invasive species, and land development are also possible influences to water quality degradation. Designated uses for the LCR include agriculture (irrigation and livestock watering), full- and partial-body-contact recreation, domestic water supply, fish consumption, and aquatic life and wildlife. Land use consists primarily of barren land followed by agriculture and widely separated urban development. The Watershed Management Plan (WMP) for the Lower Colorado River was written as part of the WaterSMART grant through the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation to expand and diversify membership for the Clean Colorado River Sustainability Coalition (CCRSCo) and develop this watershed management plan. The WMP reflects the goals and objectives identified through a stakeholder driven process, involving landowners, municipalities, Tribes, Townships, and Counties to improve and protect water quality in the Lower Colorado River from various pollutant sources. The goals and objectives of this plan were derived from community stakeholder meetings, public participation, and CCRSCo to address negative impacts to water quality in the planning area. Issues were narrowed down and prioritized, by CCRSCo and various stakeholders, to determine suspected sources and causes of pollution. Information was obtained and analyzed through aerial photographs, topographic maps, plat maps, soil surveys, biological assessments, and reports administered by various state and federal agencies, Tribes, and non- governmental organizations, historical research, and discussions with landowners throughout the watershed. Reducing point and non-point sources of pollution, analyzing future drought effects, eradicating non- native species, and investigating future land development will improve water quality in the LCR through goals described in this WMP. The goals and objectives of this WMP will be accomplished by implementing appropriate best management practices on critical sites and areas, and providing information and education to residents, landowners, Tribes, Townships, and Counties to protect open space, natural floodplains, and water quality health through effective and efficient land use planning and conservation. The primary elements of this WMP include: • Stakeholder participation • Baseline data analysis and summary • Watershed assessment • Watershed management activity recommendations. i Lower Colorado River Watershed Management Plan ii Lower Colorado River Watershed Management Plan Acronyms and Abbreviations % percent °C degrees Celsius °F degrees Fahrenheit μg/L microgram per liter ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality ADWR Arizona Department of Water Resources AGFD Arizona Game and Fish Department AZ Arizona BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs BLM Bureau of Land Management BMP best management practices CA California CaCO3 calcium carbonate CAFO Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations CAP Central Arizona Project CCRA Clean Colorado River Alliance CCRSCo Clean Colorado River Sustainability Coalition CCRWUP California’s Colorado River Water Use Plan CDBW California Department of Boating and Waterways CDTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control CDWR California Department of Water Resources CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Coalition Colorado River Regional Sewer Coalition CSWRCB California State Water Resources Control Board CWA Clean Water Act DDE Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene DEO U.S. Department of Energy DNR Department of Natural Resources DOI U.S. Department of the Interior DPP Drought Preparedness Plans EA environmental assessment EDC endocrine-disrupting compound EIS environmental impact statement EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act HACCP-NRM Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point – Natural Resource Management HUC Hydrologic Unit Code I- Interstate IBI Index of Biological Integrity IBWC International Boundary and Water Commission IDD Irrigation and Drainage District kWh kilowatt-hours LCR Lower Colorado River LCR MSCP Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program iii Lower Colorado River Watershed Management Plan LCRWQP Lower Colorado River Water Quality Partnership LDCA Laguna Division Conservation Area LUST leaking underground storage tanks M&I municipal and industrial MCL maximum contaminant level mg/L milligrams per liter MHV Lake Mohave groundwater basin mL milliliters mL/L milliliters per liter MWD Metropolitan Water District of Southern California N/A not applicable NDEP Nevada Division of Environmental Protection NGO non-governmental organization NHDES New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPS National Park Service NPSWRD National Park Service Water Resources Division NRA National Recreation Area NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NTU Nephelometric Turbidity Unit NV Nevada NWR Imperial National Wildlife Refuge PBT Persistent Bioaccumulative Toxic PCP personal care product PEC pharmaceuticals and other emerging contaminants PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric planning area Imperial National Wildlife Refuge ppb parts per billion PPCP pharmaceuticals and personal care product RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Reclamation U.S. Bureau of Reclamation RV recreational vehicle SWP System Water Plans TDS total dissolved solids TMDL total maximum daily load TSS total suspended sediments UCANR University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources U.S. United States USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USGS U.S. Geological Survey UST underground storage tank VOC volatile organic compound WCP Water Conservation Plans WMP Watershed Management Plan WQARF Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund WUR Water Use Reports WWTP wastewater treatment plant YPG Yuma Proving Ground iv Lower Colorado River Watershed Management Plan CONTENTS Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... i Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................... iii Project Partners and Acknowledgements .............................................................................................. ix Chapter 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Document Overview .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Planning Purpose and Process ................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Watershed Management Team .................................................................................................. 4 1.3.1 Public Participation Approach .................................................................................. 4 1.4 Document Organization ............................................................................................................ 6 Chapter 2 Watershed Description ........................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Physical and Natural Features ................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Watershed Boundaries and Tributaries ..................................................................... 8 2.1.2 Physical Description ............................................................................................... 11 2.1.3 Topography/Elevation Data .................................................................................... 23 2.2 Biological Resources ............................................................................................................... 24 2.2.1 Vegetation ............................................................................................................... 24 2.2.2 Wildlife ................................................................................................................... 25 2.3 Land Use and Land Cover ....................................................................................................... 30 2.3.1 Open Space ............................................................................................................. 32 2.3.2 Agriculture
Recommended publications
  • Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started
    2019 & 2020 Fishing Regulations for your boat for your boat See how much you could savegeico.com on boat | 1-800-865-4846insurance. | Local Offi ce geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Offi ce See how much you could save on boat insurance. Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. TowBoatU.S. is the preferred towing service provider for GEICO Marine Insurance. The GEICO Gecko Image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO AdPages2019.indd 2 12/4/2018 1:14:48 PM AdPages2019.indd 3 12/4/2018 1:17:19 PM Table of Contents Getting Started License Information and Fees ..........................................3 Douglas A. Ducey Governor Regulation Changes ...........................................................4 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION How to Use This Booklet ...................................................5 JAMES S. ZIELER, CHAIR — St. Johns ERIC S. SPARKS — Tucson General Statewide Fishing Regulations KURT R. DAVIS — Phoenix LELAND S. “BILL” BRAKE — Elgin Bag and Possession Limits ................................................6 JAMES R. AMMONS — Yuma Statewide Fishing Regulations ..........................................7 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Common Violations ...........................................................8 5000 W. Carefree Highway Live Baitfish
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One – Existing Conditions
    Laughlin Land Use Plan Adopted - July 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Clark County Board of Commissioners: Laughlin Town Advisory Board: Steve Sisolak, Chair James Maniaci, Chair Susan Brager, Vice-Chair Kathy Ochs, Vice-Chair Larry Brown Stephanie Bethards Chris Giunchigliani Bruce Henry Marilyn Kirkpatrick Gina Mackey Mary Beth Scow Tammy Harris, Secretary Lawrence Weekly Brian Paulson, County Liaison Office of County Manager: Planning Commission: Yolanda King, Manager Dan Shaw, Chair Randy Tarr, Assistant Manager J. Dapper, Vice-Chair Jeff Wells, Assistant Manager Edward Frasier III Kevin Schiller, Assistant Manager Vivian Kilarski Tom Morley Department of Comprehensive Planning: Nelson Stone Nancy Amundsen, Director Donna Tagliaferrri Community Planning Team: Mario Bermudez, Planning Manager Shane Ammerman, Assistant Planning Manager Kevin Smedley, Principal Planner & Project Lead Paul Doerr, Senior Planner Chris LaMay, GIS Analyst Garrett TerBerg, Principal Planner Michael Popp, Sr. Management Analyst Justin Williams, Parks Planner Ron Gregory, Trails Assistant Planning Manager Scott Hagen, Senior Planner Laughlin Land Use Plan 2017 i ii Laughlin Land Use Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 State Law ............................................................................................................ 1 Background ......................................................................................................... 1 Purpose
    [Show full text]
  • The Colorado River Aqueduct
    Fact Sheet: Our Water Lifeline__ The Colorado River Aqueduct. Photo: Aerial photo of CRA Investment in Reliability The Colorado River Aqueduct is considered one of the nation’s Many innovations came from this period in time, including the top civil engineering marvels. It was originally conceived by creation of a medical system for contract workers that would William Mulholland and designed by Metropolitan’s first Chief become the forerunner for the prepaid healthcare plan offered Engineer Frank Weymouth after consideration of more than by Kaiser Permanente. 50 routes. The 242-mile CRA carries water from Lake Havasu to the system’s terminal reservoir at Lake Mathews in Riverside. This reservoir’s location was selected because it is situated at the upper end of Metropolitan’s service area and its elevation of nearly 1,400 feet allows water to flow by gravity to the majority of our service area The CRA was the largest public works project built in Southern California during the Great Depression. Overwhelming voter approval in 1929 for a $220 million bond – equivalent to a $3.75 billion investment today – brought jobs to 35,000 people. Miners, engineers, surveyors, cooks and more came to build Colorado River the aqueduct, living in the harshest of desert conditions and Aqueduct ultimately constructing 150 miles of canals, siphons, conduits and pipelines. They added five pumping plants to lift water over mountains so deliveries could then flow west by gravity. And they blasted 90-plus miles of tunnels, including a waterway under Mount San Jacinto. THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA // // JULY 2021 FACT SHEET: THE COLORADO RIVER AQUEDUCT // // OUR WATER LIFELINE The Vision Despite the city of Los Angeles’ investment in its aqueduct, by the early 1920s, Southern Californians understood the region did not have enough local supplies to meet growing demands.
    [Show full text]
  • November 17, 2017 David Beaver & Karen Summitt 8226 S Evergreen Dr Mohave Valley, AZ 86440 Re: Purchase and Sale Agreement F
    From: Karen Summitt To: Thomas Buschatzke; Sharon Scantlebury Subject: Fw: Objections to the MVIDD Water Transfer Date: Thursday, November 16, 2017 6:24:42 PM Attachments: ADWR Letter.docx November 17, 2017 David Beaver & Karen Summitt 8226 S Evergreen Dr Mohave Valley, AZ 86440 Re: Purchase and Sale Agreement for CAWCD to Acquire Water Rights and Land in Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District, Mohave County, Arizona Dear Thomas Buschatzkle, I write to advise you that I am opposed to the proposed Central Arizona Water Conservation District (CAWCD) land and water purchase to move Colorado River water, prudently set aside for rural Arizona Colorado River mainstream users, to central Arizona for replenishment. As you may recall, the Mohave County Board of Supervisors passed two resolutions opposing the permanent transfer of any Colorado River Water Rights and Allocations to the Central Arizona Water Conservation District for use in the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District – first as to the Quartzsite transfer and second as to the WPI-WAN transfer in the Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District. Here is why I oppose this purchase and transfer of our water: First, as a matter of public policy, 4th Priority Colorado River water allocated to the users on the mainstream of the River, such as Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District (“MVIDD”) in this case, should not be transferred away from mainstream of the River. This is part of the water that the State of Arizona requested be reserved for municipal and industrial uses along the River. Except for that small reservation of 4th Priority Colorado River water to the users on the mainstream, CAWCD received all of Arizona’s Colorado River entitlement remaining at the time that CAWCD and the United States entered into their initial agreement in 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Budgets for Detrital, Hualapai, and Sacramento Valleys, Mohave County, Arizona, 2007–08
    Prepared in cooperation with the Arizona Department of Water Resources Groundwater Budgets for Detrital, Hualapai, and Sacramento Valleys, Mohave County, Arizona, 2007–08 Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5159 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: View of August 2010, monsoon thunderstorm over Hualapai Mountains, looking east from Sacramento Valley. Photo by Bradley D. Garner. Prepared in cooperation with the Arizona Department of Water Resources Groundwater Budgets for Detrital, Hualapai, and Sacramento Valleys, Mohave County, Arizona, 2007–08 By Bradley D. Garner and Margot Truini Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5159 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Suggested citation: Garner, B.D., and Truini, Margot, 2011, Groundwater budgets for Detrital, Hualapai, and Sacramento Valleys, Mohave County, Arizona, 2007–08: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5159, 34 p.
    [Show full text]
  • 28 September 2020 Desert Tortoise Management Oversight Group
    28 September 2020 DESERT TORTOISE RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION STATUS SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS Desert Tortoise Management Oversight Group Recovery Priorities 1 RIT Projects in Need of Funding 1 RIT Project Summaries 6 Top Fencing Recommendations 14 Funded RIT Projects 16 DESERT TORTOISE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT GROUP RECOVERY PRIORITIES ● Restore habitat (incl. route restoration) ● Reduce predator subsidies ● Targeted predator control ● Install and maintain tortoise barrier fencing ● Fire management planning and implementation ● Education (lower priority than on-the-ground actions) RIT PROJECTS IN NEED OF FUNDING Desert tortoise population trends through 2014 are indicated for geographic areas covered by the range-wide monitoring program Project Priority Title Budget # Rangewide RW02 Seed Increases for Desert Tortoise Habitat Restoration in Southern Nevada $140,000 California RIT - Rangewide Mojave Raven Watch - a desert tortoise rangewide human education CA09 $126,500 program Removal of free-roaming burros on BLM managed land in excess of CA41 $2,465,000 authorized population level. Identification of existing culverts and underpasses needing maintenance or CA42 modification to facilitate desert tortoise movement under highways and $48,000 roads. Rd8 Fence I-40 north of Black Ridge, CA, both sides, 5.0 miles TBD Rd11 Fence I-40 near Old Dad Mountains, both sides, 9.4 miles TBD Rd13 Fence I-40 near Kalbaker Rd, 8.1 miles TBD California RIT - Northeast Mojave Workgroup Ivanpah Critical Habitat Unit (see also CA41) -7.4%/year Increase law enforcement patrols for desert tortoise protection in Mojave CA19 $259,000 National Preserve. CA26 Evaluation of raven food subsidy sites near the Mojave National Preserve $82,133 Fenner Critical Habitat Unit (see also CA19, CA26, and CA41) -7.3%/year CA25.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Long-Range Transportation Plan for the Colorado River Indian
    2014 Strategic Long Range Transportation Plan for the Colorado River Indian Tribes Final Report Prepared by: Prepared for: COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES APRIL 2014 Project Management Team Arizona Department of Transportation Colorado River Indian Tribes 206 S. 17th Ave. 26600 Mohave Road Mail Drop: 310B Parker, Arizona 85344 Phoenix, AZ 85007 Don Sneed, ADOT Project Manager Greg Fisher, Tribal Project Manager Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Telephone: 602-712-6736 Telephone: (928) 669-1358 Mobile: (928) 515-9241 Tony Staffaroni, ADOT Community Relations Project Manager Email: [email protected] Phone: (602) 245-4051 Project Consultant Team Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 333 East Wetmore Road, Suite 280 Tucson, AZ 85705 Mary Rodin, AICP Email: [email protected] Telephone: 520-352-8626 Mobile: 520-256-9832 Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc. 21636 N. Dietz Drive Maricopa, Arizona 85138 Sharon Morris, President Email: [email protected] Telephone: 520-316-6745 This report has been funded in part through financial assistance from the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data, and for the use or adaptation of previously published material, presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Arizona Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Trade or manufacturers’ names that may appear herein are cited only because they are considered essential to the objectives of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Memorable Travel Experiences Since 1979 2021
    2021 DREAM BOOK LLC CREATING MEMORABLE TRAVEL EXPERIENCES SINCE 1979 One from the Road… When we returned to the road in August, one of our first trips was By the end of the tour, you feel like you just watched Ellen, Dr. Phil across Nevada to pick up the historic (which later and Saturday Night Live. You have truly met the locals once you Lincoln Highway SUCCESS STORIES—A SpECIAl AdvERTISIng SECTIOn became U.S. 50) and make our way back to Sacramento. Small finish walking among the headstones. towns proved to be a good way to gently try and return to traveling. Sure, we would all I didn’t know Wally would even be in town. Last I heard he was prefer not to have to wear a mask and wash buying a camper and heading out to see the world when he retired. our hands every 20 minutes. But if you love For reasons I’m hopeful I’ll hear about some day, he was back in to travel, right now you have to make a few Eureka. compromises. With any luck, those will be short term and we will be able to travel more It’s possible the folks on the trip may have noticed the tear in my eye freely soon. or the crack in my voice when my friend showed up to say hi. Or when he starting telling a couple members of our group about the Our trip went well. We slipped in and out of a cemetery tour and I broke out laughing really loud.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the Salton Sea with No Restoration Project
    HAZARD The Future of the Salton Sea With No Restoration Project MAY 2006 © Copyright 2006, All Rights Reserved ISBN No. 1-893790-12-6 ISBN-13: 978-1-893790-12-4 Pacific Institute 654 13th Street, Preservation Park Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone (510) 251-1600 Facsimile (510) 251-2203 [email protected] www.pacinst.org HAZARD The Future of the Salton Sea With No Restoration Project Michael J. Cohen and Karen H. Hyun A report of the MAY 2006 Prepared with the support of The Salton Sea Coalition & Imperial Visions The U.S. Geological Survey Salton Sea Science Office and the Compton Foundation About the Authors Michael Cohen is a Senior Associate at the Pacific Institute. He is the lead author of the Institute’s 1999 report entitled Haven or Hazard: The Ecology and Future of the Salton Sea, and of the 2001 report entitled Missing Water: The Uses and Flows of Water in the Colorado River Delta Region. He is also the co-author of several journal articles on water and the environment in the border region. He is a member of the California Resources Agency’s Salton Sea Advisory Committee. Karen Hyun is a Ph.D. candidate in the Marine Affairs Program at the University of Rhode Island. Her research interests include ecosystem-based management and governance, especially in the Colorado River Delta. She also has interests in transboundary water issues, authoring Solutions Lie Between the Extremes: The Evolution of International Watercourse Law on the Colorado River. In addition, she has examined watershed to coast issues in Transboundary Solutions to Environmental Problems in the Gulf of California Large Marine Ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Adventures Easy Trips to Take with the Kids, 15 from a Scenic Drive in Sedona to a Pioneer Museum in Snowflake
    Perkinsville Road — No Yep. Bisbee’s Ballpark Is The Ferocious Nature Guardrails,THE STATE’SNo Problem BESTEven HORSEOlder Than TRAILS. Fenway ofGIDDYUP! the Cactus Wren w MAY 2009 ESCAPE. EXPLORE. EXPERIENCE family adventures Easy Trips to Take With the Kids, 15 From a Scenic Drive in Sedona to a Pioneer Museum in Snowflake Restaurants ARIZONA BY HELICOPTER: The Ultimate Way +to See the State CANOEING THE COLORADO HIKING THE MOGOLLON RIM contents 05.09 features Grand Canyon National Park 14 FAMILY ADVENTURES Williams Topock Gorge Clark Griswold wasn’t worried about finding the Grand Canyon. Jerome “It’s the biggest hole in the world,” he said in Family Vacation. Mogollon Rim Whether you’re loading up the “Family Truckster” for a trip to the world’s Seventh Natural Wonder, or just looking for a quick, PHOENIX economical family adventure all your own, Arizona has some- Tucson thing for every family. BY KELLY KRAMER Bisbee 20 WATER, WATER EVERYWHERE POINTS OF INTEREST IN THIS ISSUE Arizona isn’t exactly known for its water supply. Canyons and cactuses, yes; water, no. Well, like the Arizona Cardinals, who proved that a football team from the desert really could go to the Super Bowl, we’re using this month’s portfolio to prove that Arizona has some of the most spectacular watering holes in the world. BY GARY LADD 30 A BETTER VIEW The Grand Canyon is spectacular no matter where you’re departments standing — on the South Rim, along the river or on the roof of a Winnebago. Those vantage points, however, pale in compari- 2 EDITOR’S LETTER 3 CONTRIBUTORS 4 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR son to the views you’ll get from a Robinson R44 Raven II heli- 5 THE JOURNAL copter.
    [Show full text]
  • Law of the River the Colorado River Compact
    Colorado River Water Users Association: Law of the River . The Colorado River Compact . As the 20th century dawned, the The Colorado River Compact vast domain of the Colorado River lay almost entirely Boulder Canyon Project Act untouched. Though there had been a few early filings for Treaty with Mexico diversion and a "grand ditch" conveying water some 16 miles across the Continental Divide Upper Colorado River Basin into eastern Colorado in the late Compact of 1948 1800s, California's Imperial Valley was among the first areas to tap the river's true potential. In early 1901, the 60 mile long Alamo Canal, Colorado River Storage Project developed by private concerns, was completed to deliver Colorado Act River water for irrigation, and a wasteland was transformed. But the Imperial Valley did not move ahead without problems. About 50 miles Grand Canyon Protection Act of the canal coursed through Mexico, leaving the valley farmers at the mercy of a foreign government. And in 1905, the river, raging with Arizona vs. California floods, eroded the opening to the canal, roared through and created the Salton Sea before the river was pushed back into its normal channel. Future of Western Water With the constant threat of flood looming along the lower Colorado, demands grew for some sort of permanent flood control work -a storage reservoir and dam on the river. And Imperial Valley farmers called for a canal totally within the United States, free of Mexican interference. By 1919, Imperial Irrigation District had won the support of the federal Bureau of Reclamation. A bureau engineering board recommended favorably on the canal and added the government "should undertake the early construction of a storage reservoir on the drainage basin of the Colorado." While this report was greeted with enthusiasm by people along the river's lower stretches, it was viewed with alarm by those in upper reaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohave County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Mohave County Multi‐Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Background and Scope ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Assurances ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Plan Organization ........................................................................................................................... 3 SECTION 2: COMMUNITY PROFILES ................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Mohave County ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Bullhead City ................................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Colorado City ................................................................................................................................ 19 2.4 Kingman ........................................................................................................................................ 21 2.5 Lake
    [Show full text]