Ontario Fishing Regulations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Prosp Rpt Magpie Prop
Prospecting Report on the Magpie Property By John Buckle, P.Geo. October 25, 2003 REVISED FEBRUARY 15, 2004 2.26586 RECEIVED FEB 1 9 GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT j OFFICE—- _ ., 42C02NE2003 2.26586 LECLAIRE 010 Introduction This report covers the work done during the summer and fall of 2003 on the 80 hectar property claim number 1235586. Two 6 claim units were staked November 17 and 18, 2001. Following a declaration from the mining recorder to extend the claim block to enclose the full one square kilometre available in Leclaire township in Sault Ste Marie district, claim map G2782. Mineral claim staking in this township was originally under the control of Algoma Central Railway and subsequently by Wagner Forest Services except for a few claim blocks that predated the ACR agreement. One of these blocks that straddles the Magpie River is Crown Land with mineral rights administered by the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. The claim block was staked in the name of John Buckle, prospecting license # C39049, client number^ 13252 . The claims were subsequently transferred to Oasis Diamond Exploration the current claim holder. My first visit to the property was prior to staking on November 16, 2001. On this visit I recognized mafic to intermediate breccia on an outcrop in the Magpie River with a field assistant Mr. Constantine Foussekis. The property was subsequently staked the following two days and reconnaissance samples were collected for examination. On May 6, 2003 I revisited with Mr. Nicolas Pedafironimos of Oasis Diamond exploration. On this visit prospecting and geological mapping of the outcropping peninsula and the opposite coastline on the east shore of the Magpie River. -
How COVID-19 Is Impacting Businesses in Thunder Bay (Part 2)
From Crisis to Recovery: How COVID-19 is Impacting Businesses in Thunder Bay (Part 2) MAY/EARLY JUNE 2020 RESULTS Thunder Bay District COVID-19 Business Impact SURVEY Thunder Bay District COVID-19 Business Impact SURVEY Table of Contents Partners ............................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 4 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 5 Results .............................................................................................................. 5 Business continuity impact ............................................................................. 7 Business human resource impact ................................................................ 16 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 20 Works Cited ..................................................................................................... 20 2 Thunder Bay District COVID-19 Business Impact SURVEY Partners Northern Policy Institute is Northern Ontario’s independent think tank. They perform research, collect and disseminate evidence, and identify policy opportunities to support the growth of sustainable Northern communities. NPI operations are located in Thunder Bay and Sudbury. They seek to enhance Northern Ontario’s capacity to take the lead position -
Flood Plain Mapping Study Burnt River
Flood Plain Mapping Study Burnt River Final Report May 2019 Executive Summary The primary goals of this study are to create hydrologic and hydraulic models of the watershed and produce flood plain mapping for Burnt River from the outlet to Cameron Lake to the hamlet of Burnt River. The mapping will allow the City of Kawartha Lakes and Kawartha Conservation staff to make informed decisions about future land use and identify flood hazard reduction opportunities. The Burnt River Flood Plain Mapping Study was subject to a comprehensive peer review for core components: data collection, data processing, hydrologic modeling, hydraulic modeling, and map generation. The process was supported throughout by a Technical Committee consisting of technical/managerial staff from Ganaraska Conservation, the City of Kawartha Lakes, and Kawartha Conservation. Topics discussed in this study include: • Previous studies in the area • Collection of LiDAR, bathymetry and orthophoto data • Proposed land use • Delineation of hydrology subcatchments • Creation of a Visual OTTHYMO hydrology model for Regional (Timmins) Storm • Calculation of subcatchment hydrology model parameters • Derivation of flow peaks at key nodes along the watercourse • Flood Frequency Analysis for the 2, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year events • Creation of a HEC-RAS hydraulic model • Creation of flood plain maps Key elements of this study include: • The Timmins storm is the Regulatory Event for the watercourse • Flood plain maps are to be created based on the highest flood elevation of the calculated water surface elevations Key recommendations of this study: • The maps created from the results of the HEC-RAS model for Burnt River Creek should be endorsed by the Kawartha Conservation Board. -
Diamond Drill Rpt Ames
Winter 2007-08 Vanguard Property Diamond Drill Program Ames, Haines, Kashabowie Lake, Burchell Lake, and Crayfish Lake Townships Thunder Bay Mining District Ontario NTS: 52B/09, 52B/10 Prepared for: Everett Resources Ltd. Prepared by: Michael J. Thompson, P.Geo. Fladgate Exploration Consulting Corporation Date: March 26, 2008 FFFlllaaadddgggaaattteee EEExxppplllooorrraaatttiiiooonnn CCCooonnnsssuuullltttiiinnnggg Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 2 Terms of Reference ...................................................................................... 2 3 Disclaimer ..................................................................................................... 2 4 Property Location and Description ............................................................. 2 5 Access Infastructure and Resources ......................................................... 7 6 Climate and Physiography .......................................................................... 7 7 Geological Setting ........................................................................................ 7 7.1 Regional and Local Geology ............................................................................ 7 7.2 Property Geology ............................................................................................. 8 7.3 Alteration and Mineralisation ............................................................................ 9 8 History of Exploration -
Provincial Land Tax Review Stakeholder Consultations to Date
Provincial Land Tax Review: A Summary of Stakeholder Consultations Feedback Received To Date December 2014 Ministry of Finance Table of Contents Overview .....................................................................................................................................................1 Consultation Process to Date ......................................................................................................................2 Consultations with Unincorporated Area Representatives ................................................................... 2 Written Submissions Received............................................................................................................... 3 Northern Municipalities ......................................................................................................................... 3 Provincial Land Tax Information .................................................................................................................4 What Is the Provincial Land Tax? ........................................................................................................... 4 Information on Unincorporated Areas .................................................................................................. 6 Properties in Unincorporated Areas .................................................................................................. 6 Property Assessment in Unincorporated Areas ................................................................................. 6 Differences -
GREAT LAKES FOREST RESEARCH CENTRE Box 490 • Sault Ste. Marie Ontario FOREST INSECT and DISEASE CONDITIONS in ONTARIO
Government Gouvernemenl of Canada du Canada Canadian Service Forestry canadien des Service forets Forest; Insect and Disease Conditions in Ontario Fall 1985 f k i . ' -4. Chinese experts learn Forest Insect and Disease Survey methods GREAT LAKES FOREST RESEARCH CENTRE Box 490 • Sault Ste. Marie Ontario FOREST INSECT AND DISEASE CONDITIONS IN ONTARIO Fall 1985 This is Che last of three bulletins issued by the Forest Insect and Disease Survey (FIDS) Unit of the Great Lakes Forestry Centre (GLFC) describing forest insect, disease and abiotic conditions in the province of Ontario in 1985. More detailed regional reports describing pest con ditions in the eight Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) admin istrative regions are being prepared and will be issued early in 1986. ANNUAL FOREST PEST REVIEWS The ninth annual Ontario pest reviews were held in southern and northern Ontario, respectively, on 5 and 6 November, 1985. The southern review took place in the Mac Donald Block, Queen's Park, Toronto, and the northern review was held at GLFC in Sault Ste. Marie. The southern review featured presentations on major pests including gypsy EoCh spruce and jack pine budworms, Scleroderris canker (European strain) and the pinewood nematode. Presentations were also made on such topics "L ™i e PeStS C°f SeedS> COneS and Plantations) , hardwood decline and OMNR spray policy and procedures. Dr. J.R. Carrow Dean of Forestry University of Toronto, made a presentation entitled "Spruce Budwora Some Lessons From the East". Updates were provided on the status of other pests such as the oak leaf shredder, forest tent cater pillar brown spot needle blight and wind damage. -
Geology of the Upper Magpie R Area
42CI0NE887S DOUCETT0010A1 DOUCETT 010 GEOLOGY OF THE UPPER MAGPIE RIVER AREA ALGOMA DISTRICT, OSTARIO T. W. Page, P .Eng. Port Arthur, Ontario December l, 1958. : -© O - r\. # ;©-V SUMMARY The Upper Magpie River Acea includes the south easterly section of a belt of northeasterly trending volcanic and sedimentary rooks of early Precambrian age. This belt in general occupies the drainage basin of the Kabinakagami River* The area lies some 30 miles northeasterly from White River, Ontario. Volcanic agglomerates are enclosed by inter- banded flows and tuffs which are in turn flanked by sedimentary quartz-biotile gneisses. Oranite gneiss bounds these rooks *.o the southeast and southwest. Within the central and southeasterly portion of the map area all members have been folded into a steeply plunging syncline with axial plane trend ing southeasterly such that it protrudes from the main belt. Two complementary fault planes striking northeast and northwest intersect near the centre of the area. Both show horizontal displacement. A fsw minor occurrences of metallic mineralization were found bat none w.*s indicative of economic possibilities. t*i*©..:--VJi©5&-© 1.. **©.-©-." fclfr-©v GEOLOGY OF THE UPPER MAGPIE RIVER AREA ALGOMA DISTRICT, ONTARIO LOCATION AM) ACCESS The Upper Magpie River Area lies some 30 miles northeast of White River station on the Canadian Pacific Railway from where it is most readily reached by air transportation. An alternative route is by canoe from Swanson siding on the Canadian Pacific Railway eight miles west of Franz Station. This route, also of some 30 miles, follows up through Esnagi Lake thence west into Mosambik Lake and into the Magpie River. -
Appendix F Environmental Features
Appendix F Environmental Features YELLOW FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT APPENDIX F Note Prior to the release of the Draft EA, the Project was referred to as the Island Falls Hydroelectric Project. Following release of a draft environmental assessment report for review by First Nations, agencies, and members of the public, numerous comments were received. As a direct result of agency and public consultation, YFP made a decision to relocate the Project two kilometres upstream of Island Falls to Yellow Falls. Accordingly, the Project name has changed to the “Yellow Falls Hydroelectric Project” and the Project nameplate capacity has changed from 20 MW to 16 MW. The following Environmental Features report details existing natural and socioeconomic conditions and was prepared for the Island Falls location. Project relocation has not appreciably altered descriptions of existing natural and socioeconomic conditions. The Yellow Falls Project location has been provided on figures to indicate how the revised location corresponds with existing natural and socioeconomic environmental features. Appendix F1 Environmental Features Report ISLAND FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT APPENDIX F1 – ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES File No. 160960168 Prepared for: Yellow Falls Power Limited Partnership c/o 500, 1324 – 17th Avenue SW Calgary, AB T2T 5S8 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 70 Southgate Drive, Suite 1 Guelph ON N1G 4P5 February 2009 ISLAND FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT APPENDIX F1 – ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................1 -
Four Mile Lake Watershed Characterization Report 2017
Four Mile Lake Watershed Characterization Report 2017 About Kawartha Conservation Who we are We are a watershed-based organization that uses planning, stewardship, science, and conservation lands management to protect and sustain outstanding water quality and quantity supported by healthy landscapes. Why is watershed management important? Abundant, clean water is the lifeblood of the Kawarthas. It is essential for our quality of life, health, and continued prosperity. It supplies our drinking water, maintains property values, sustains an agricultural industry, and contributes to a tourism-based economy that relies on recreational boating, fishing, and swimming. Our programs and services promote an integrated watershed approach that balance human, environmental, and economic needs. The community we support We focus our programs and services within the natural boundaries of the Kawartha watershed, which extend from Lake Scugog in the southwest and Pigeon Lake in the east, to Balsam Lake in the northwest and Crystal Lake in the northeast – a total of 2,563 square kilometers. Our history and governance In 1979, we were established by our municipal partners under the Ontario Conservation Authorities Act. The natural boundaries of our watershed overlap the six municipalities that govern Kawartha Conservation through representation on our Board of Directors. Our municipal partners include the City of Kawartha Lakes, Region of Durham, Township of Scugog, Township of Brock, Municipality of Clarington, Municipality of Trent Lakes, and Township of Cavan Monaghan. Kawartha Conservation 277 Kenrei Road, Lindsay ON K9V 4R1 T: 705.328.2271 F: 705.328.2286 [email protected] KawarthaConservation.com ii FOUR MILE LAKE WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION REPORT – 2017 KAWARTHA CONSERVATION Acknowledgements This Watershed Characterization Report was prepared by the Technical Services Department team of Kawartha Conservation with considerable support from other internal staff and external organizations. -
Ontario's Stream Rehabilitation Manual
Ontario’s Stream Rehabilitation Manual Written by Mark G. Heaton Rick Grillmayer And Jack G. Imhof Illustrations By Roy DeGuisti Copyright by Ontario Streams 17266 Old Main Street, Belfountain, Ontario L0N 1B0 May 2002 All Rights Reserved. Chapter 1 Introduction The Created Need Restoration, Rehabilitation or Reclamation Building on Experience Partnerships Mean Ownership Chapter 2 Perspectives What is a Watershed? Life in a Dynamic Physical Environment ….. Eco ~ System Stream Corridors The Natural Tendency of Rivers (written by Jack G. Imhof) Chapter 3 Look Before You Leap Project Planning Basics STEP 1: Focus STEP 2: Research and Reconnaissance STEP 3: Evaluation and Impact Assessment STEP 4: Goal, Objectives and Targets Chapter 4 Charting the Course to Action! STEP 5: Plan, Prepare and Consult STEP 6: Implement STEP 7: Monitor and Report Chapter 5 Learning From The Past Gathering The Information Drawing Conclusions... Chapter 6 Techniques Introduction Barrier Management Barrier Modification Fishways Soil Bioengineering (written by R. Grillmayer) Live Staking Fascines Brushlayers Brushmattress Live Cribwall Willow Posts Native Material Revetment Live Rock Revetment Habitat Improvement L.U.N.K.E.R.S. Boulder Placement Half Log Cover Instream Log Cover The Sweeper Palette Cover Cabled Log Jam Channel Rehabilitation Natural Channel Reconstruction (Under Construction) Riparian Corridor Rehabilitation (Under Construction) Woody Debris Management Low Stage Weirs (Under Construction) Wing Deflectors Bibliography Bibliography Appendices Appendix -
Download Issue 67
THE OSPrEY A Journal Published by the Steelhead Committee Federation of Fly Fishers Dedicated to the Preservation of Wild Steelhead • Issue No. 67 • SEPTEmbEr 2010 Nottawasaga River Steelhead A Great Lakes lesson in local adaptation and naturalization by Brian P. Morrison, Fred Dobbs and Chris Atkinson — Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, Nottawasaga Steeheaders — Fisheries biologist Brian Morrison accidentally released into the Pine steelhead in the Canadian waters of the Ganaraska Region River, a Nottawasaga River tribu - of the Great Lakes proper. Shortly Conservation Authority, Fred thereafter, steelhead were making Dobbs, stewerdship services man - seasonal migrations between the ager for the Nottawasaga Valley Nottawasaga River and Georgian Conservation Authority and Chris Bay/Lake Huron; with these fish Atkinson of the Nottawasaga As early as 1903, likely resulting from the acciden - Steelheaders outline the establish - tal release of steelhead into the ment of a naturalized steelhead adult steelhead were Pine River. population in the Lake Huron documented in The life history characteristics of Basin, Ontario, Canada and how it the naturalized steelhead popula - might provide insight for re-intro - tributaries of the tions in the Great Lakes resemble ducing extirpated steelhead popu - those of anadromous forms native lations in other regions. Nottawasage River. to Pacific coastal drainages, although local populations display igratory rainbow varying life history traits. trout ( Oncorhynchus tary (Figure 1) by 1900, likely off - Continued on Page 4 mykiss ), also known spring of fish spawned from the as steelhead, were McLeod River, California. As Mintroduced into Lake Huron in 1876 The Osprey is now early as 1903 adult steelhead were when the AuSable River in documented in tributaries of the also available via Michigan was stocked with rain - Nottawasaga River, and it has been electronic delivery. -
Ontario FMZ Results
2015 Survey of Recreational Fishing in Canada: Selected Results for Fisheries Management Zones in Ontario This technical report should be cited as follows: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. 2020. 2015 Survey of Recreational Fishing in Canada: Results for Fisheries Management Zones of Ontario. Fish and Wildlife Policy Branch. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Peterborough, Ontario. 61pp. Printed in Ontario, Canada MNRF Print: 978-1-4868-4729-7 PDF: 978-1-4868-4730-3 This publication was produced by: Fisheries Policy Section Fish and Wildlife Policy Branch Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 300 Water Street, Peterborough, Ontario 9J8M5 Cover photo courtesy of A. Skinner, 2020 This specialized publication, 2015 Survey of Recreational Fishing in Canada: Results for Fisheries Management Zones of Ontario is available in English only according to Regulation 411/97 which exempts it from translation under the French Language Services Act. To obtain information in French, please contact the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry at [email protected]. Cette publication hautement spécialisée, 2015 Survey of Recreational Fishing in Canada: Results for Fisheries Management Zones of Ontario n'est disponible qu'en anglais en vertu du Règlement 671/92 qui en exempte l'application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l'aide en français, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère des richesses naturelles au [email protected]. 2015 Survey of Recreational Fishing in Canada: Ontario Results i Executive Summary The 2015 Survey of Recreational Fishing in Canada collected information from anglers about their recreational fishing activities to assess the economic and social importance of recreational fisheries to Canada’s provinces and territories.