Quantum Foam and Topological Strings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Engineering the Quantum Foam
Engineering the Quantum Foam Reginald T. Cahill School of Chemistry, Physics and Earth Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia [email protected] _____________________________________________________ ABSTRACT In 1990 Alcubierre, within the General Relativity model for space-time, proposed a scenario for ‘warp drive’ faster than light travel, in which objects would achieve such speeds by actually being stationary within a bubble of space which itself was moving through space, the idea being that the speed of the bubble was not itself limited by the speed of light. However that scenario required exotic matter to stabilise the boundary of the bubble. Here that proposal is re-examined within the context of the new modelling of space in which space is a quantum system, viz a quantum foam, with on-going classicalisation. This model has lead to the resolution of a number of longstanding problems, including a dynamical explanation for the so-called `dark matter’ effect. It has also given the first evidence of quantum gravity effects, as experimental data has shown that a new dimensionless constant characterising the self-interaction of space is the fine structure constant. The studies here begin the task of examining to what extent the new spatial self-interaction dynamics can play a role in stabilising the boundary without exotic matter, and whether the boundary stabilisation dynamics can be engineered; this would amount to quantum gravity engineering. 1 Introduction The modelling of space within physics has been an enormously challenging task dating back in the modern era to Galileo, mainly because it has proven very difficult, both conceptually and experimentally, to get a ‘handle’ on the phenomenon of space. -
Arxiv:1404.2323V1 [Math.AG] 8 Apr 2014 Membranes and Sheaves
Membranes and Sheaves Nikita Nekrasov and Andrei Okounkov April 2014 Contents 1 A brief introduction 2 1.1 Overview.............................. 2 1.2 MotivationfromM-theory . 3 1.3 Planofthepaper ......................... 7 1.4 Acknowledgements ........................ 7 2 Contours of the conjectures 8 2.1 K-theorypreliminaries ...................... 8 2.2 Theindexsheaf.......................... 10 2.3 Comparison with Donaldson-Thomastheory . 15 2.4 Fields of 11-dimensional supergravity and degree zero DT counts 19 3 The DT integrand 24 3.1 Themodifiedvirtualstructuresheaf. 24 3.2 The interaction term Φ ...................... 28 arXiv:1404.2323v1 [math.AG] 8 Apr 2014 4 The index of membranes 33 4.1 Membranemoduli......................... 33 4.2 Deformationsofmembranes . 36 5 Examples 37 5.1 Reducedlocalcurves ....................... 37 5.2 Doublecurves........................... 39 5.3 Single interaction between smooth curves . 42 5.4 HigherrankDTcounts. .. .. 43 5.5 EngineeringhigherrankDTtheory . 45 1 6 Existence of square roots 49 6.1 Symmetricbundlesonsquares . 49 6.2 SquarerootsinDTtheory . 50 6.3 SquarerootsinM-theory. 52 7 Refined invariants 54 7.1 Actionsscalingthe3-form . 54 7.2 Localization for κ-trivialtori................... 56 7.3 Morsetheoryandrigidity . 60 8 Index vertex and refined vertex 61 8.1 Toric Calabi-Yau 3-folds . 61 8.2 Virtualtangentspacesatfixedpoints . 63 8.3 Therefinedvertex ........................ 66 A Appendix 70 A.1 Proofofthebalancelemma . 70 1 A brief introduction 1.1 Overview Our goal in this paper is to discuss a conjectural correspondence between enumerative geometry of curves in Calabi-Yau 5-folds Z and 1-dimensional sheaves on 3-folds X that are embedded in Z as fixed points of certain C×- actions. In both cases, the enumerative information is taken in equivariant K-theory, where the equivariance is with respect to all automorphisms of the problem. -
Arxiv:1512.05388V2 [Hep-Th] 2 Jan 2016 1
BPS/CFT CORRESPONDENCE: NON-PERTURBATIVE DYSON-SCHWINGER EQUATIONS AND qq-CHARACTERS NIKITA NEKRASOV Abstract. We study symmetries of quantum field theories involving topologically dis- tinct sectors of the field space. To exhibit these symmetries we define special gauge invariant observables, which we call the qq-characters. In the context of the BPS/CFT correspondence, using these observables, we derive an infinite set of Dyson-Schwinger- type relations. These relations imply that the supersymmetric partition functions in the presence of Ω-deformation and defects obey the Ward identities of two dimen- sional conformal field theory and its q-deformations. The details will be discussed in the companion papers. Contents 1. Introduction 4 1.1. Dyson-Schwinger equations 4 1.2. Non-perturbative Dyson-Schwinger identities 6 1.3. Organization of the presentation 8 1.4. Acknowledgements 10 2. The BPS/CFT correspondence 12 2.1. = 2 partition functions 12 2.2. DefectN operators and lower-dimensional theories 13 2.3. The Y- and X-observables 14 2.4. The physics of X-observables 14 arXiv:1512.05388v2 [hep-th] 2 Jan 2016 2.5. Hidden symmetries 17 2.6. Some notations. 17 2.7. Equivariant virtual Chern polynomials 22 3. Supersymmetric gauge theories 22 3.1. Quivers 22 3.2. Quivers with colors 22 3.3. The symmetry groups 22 3.4. The parameters of Lagrangian 24 3.5. The group H 25 3.6. Perturbative theory 26 3.7. Realizations of quiver theories 28 4. Integration over instanton moduli spaces 30 1 2 NIKITA NEKRASOV 4.1. Instanton partition function 30 4.2. -
Does LIGO Prove General Relativity?
Does LIGO Prove General Relativity? by Clark M. Thomas © May 12, 2016; modified Sept. 11, 2016 ABSTRACT LIGO-detected "gravitational waves" are very real. This successful experiment in early 2016 did open up a new form of astronomy. Despite the hype, the initial explanation for what was discovered neither confirms nor denies Einstein's full theory of General Relativity, including the concept of gravity membranes (branes). The LIGO discovery can be explained by a model somewhat similar to de Broglie-Bohm quantum pilot waves. LIGO-detected "gravitational waves" are real. The successful experiment in early 2016 did open up a new form of astronomy. However, despite the hype, the initial explanation for what was discovered neither confirms nor denies Einstein's full theory of Page !1 of !11 General Relativity, including the concept of gravity membranes (branes). It merely confirms his 2016 guess that gravity waves should be generated, and that they potentially could be detected and measured. That’s a long way from the core of his GR thesis.1 “Spacetime” is a cool idea, but it merely records the timely effects of motion within a 3D Universe, making up frame-specific 4D spacetimes – with seemingly infinite discrete inertial frames of reference.2 Einstein's idea of "c" being the somewhat mystical absolute limit of measured speed in any direction simply acknowledges the initial acceleration of electromagnetic particle strings from their graviton base within a frame of reference. Speed of light within a vacuum is only the initial burst of acceleration for each yin/yang photon string as it leaves its graviton “mother ship.”3 A better explanation for the waves detected by LIGO is a 21st century paradigm of push/shadow gravity – within a 3D set sea of “quantum foam” (primarily Yin/Yang particles, Y/Y strings, Y/Y graviton rings, and some larger particles). -
Quantum Geometrodynamics with Intrinsic Time Development
2nd LeCosPA International Symposium, Nat.Taiwan U. (December 17th 2015) Quantum geometrodynamics with intrinsic time development 許 Chopin Soo 祖 斌 Department of Physics, Nat. Cheng Kung U, Taiwan Everything? What about (let’s not forget) the `problem of time’ ? A very wise man once said “What then is time? If no one asks me, I know what it is. If I wish to explain it to him who asks, I do not know”, pondering the mystery of what time really is, Saint Augustine (of Hippo) (354-430 A.D.) wrote in his Confessions《懺悔錄》, “Si nemo ex me quaerat scio; Si quaerente explicare velim, nescio ’’ Time: We all have some intuitive understanding of time. But what is time? Where does it comes from? Physical theory of space and time Einstein’s GR: Classical space-time <-> (pseudo-Riemannian)Geometry Quantum Gravity: “`Spacetime’ - a concept of limited applicability” ---J. A. Wheeler What, if anything at all, plays the role of “time” in Quantum Gravity? Importance of time: 1)Quantum probabilities are normalized at fixed instances of time 2)Time <-> Hamiltonian as generator of time translation/evolution Hamiltonian <-> Energy Time: Is it 1) fundamental (present even in Quantum Gravity)? 2) emergent (present in the (semi)-classical context only)? 3) an illusion (!)? … Nemeti, Istvan et al. arXiv:0811.2910 [gr-qc] Getting to know Einstein’s theory Spacetime tells matter how to move; matter tells spacetime how to curve John Wheeler, in Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam p.235 This saying has seeped into popular culture and public discourse; but with all due respect to Wheeler, it is the Hamiltonian which tells everything (including the metric) how to move! from The Early Universe (E. -
Quantum Information Hidden in Quantum Fields
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 July 2020 Peer-reviewed version available at Quantum Reports 2020, 2, 33; doi:10.3390/quantum2030033 Article Quantum Information Hidden in Quantum Fields Paola Zizzi Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Piazza Botta, 11, 27100 Pavia, Italy; [email protected]; Phone: +39 3475300467 Abstract: We investigate a possible reduction mechanism from (bosonic) Quantum Field Theory (QFT) to Quantum Mechanics (QM), in a way that could explain the apparent loss of degrees of freedom of the original theory in terms of quantum information in the reduced one. This reduction mechanism consists mainly in performing an ansatz on the boson field operator, which takes into account quantum foam and non-commutative geometry. Through the reduction mechanism, QFT reveals its hidden internal structure, which is a quantum network of maximally entangled multipartite states. In the end, a new approach to the quantum simulation of QFT is proposed through the use of QFT's internal quantum network Keywords: Quantum field theory; Quantum information; Quantum foam; Non-commutative geometry; Quantum simulation 1. Introduction Until the 1950s, the common opinion was that quantum field theory (QFT) was just quantum mechanics (QM) plus special relativity. But that is not the whole story, as well described in [1] [2]. There, the authors mainly say that the fact that QFT was "discovered" in an attempt to extend QM to the relativistic regime is only historically accidental. Indeed, QFT is necessary and applied also in the study of condensed matter, e.g. in the case of superconductivity, superfluidity, ferromagnetism, etc. -
Model Building and SUSY Breaking on D-Branes
Model building and SUSY breaking on D-branes Dmitry Malyshev a dissertation presented to the faculty of princeton university in candidacy for the degree of doctor of philosophy recommended for acceptance by the department of physics Adviser: Herman Verlinde September 2008 c Copyright by Dmitry Malyshev, 2008. All rights reserved. Abstract In the recent years there has been an increase of the interest in applying the String theory to construct viable extensions of the Standard Model and to find stringy analogs of the known field theory models for supersymmetry breaking. In my dissertation I will focus on the constructions involving the D-branes at the Calabi-Yau singularities in type IIB string theory. The main motivations for this choice are: the decoupling of the D-brane field theory from the supergravity, the well established tools for deriving the field theories from the configurations of the D-branes, and the possibility of using the gauge-gravity correspondence in solving some non-perturbative aspects in the field theory. A construction of an extended supersymmetric Standard Model on a D3-brane at the del Pezzo 8 singularity is presented in the first part of the dissertation. In the second part we discuss the possible representations of the SUSY breaking models in String Theory and obtain the metastable SUSY breaking vacuum in a system of D-branes on the suspended pinch point singularity. The gauge mediation of this SUSY breaking model is described in details. In the simplest model the spectrum of particles in the visible sector has a split SUSY breaking, the sfermions are one order of magnitude heavier than the gauginos. -
Nikita Nekrasov 講義録
Nikita Nekrasov 講義録 December, 1998 講義録作成1 :橋本幸士, 岸本 功 (京大理) 目次 第 I 部 超共形ゲージ理論と AdS 超重力理論 2 1 Introduction と motivation 3 2 Orbifold 理論 6 3 時空の状況 12 4 Orbifold から conifold への変形 17 5 まとめ 19 第 II 部 N =2ゲージ理論における状態のカウント 21 6 導入 22 7 D3-プローブ上の理論 22 8M理論への持ち上げ/引き落とし 27 9 結論 39 1この講義録は「Workshop ”ゲージ理論の力学と弦双対性” 1998 年 12 月 16 日(水)–12月 18 日(金)東京工業大学国際交流会館」における Nekrasov 氏の講義に基づくものです。第 I 部が 16 日に、第 II 部が 18 日に行われました。 1 第 I 部 超共形ゲージ理論とAdS超重力理論 (SUPER)CONFORMAL GAUGE THEORIES AND ANTI-DE-SITTER SUPERGRAVITY2 Nikita Nekrasov 1. Introduction と motivation ——哲学, D-brane と付随した場の理論, 特異な幾何からの conformal 理論 2. Orbifold 理論 ——理論の構築(:gauge 群, matter の内容, (超)対称性), β 関数の計算, 摂動論の解析 3. 時空の状況 ——near-horizon limit, 超重力における変形 4. Orbifold から conifold への変形 ——場の理論の実現, Higgs branch の幾何, 時空解釈(conjecture) 2文献 [1, 2] に基づく。[3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] も見よ。 2 第 1 章 Introduction と motivation 双対性に関する動きの中でおそらく最も(そしておそらく唯一つの)重要な教訓は、面白い物理は面白い幾何に関係 しているという発想に立ち返るということである。Einstein の時代に比べての違いは、勿論量子的な物理量が古典的な 幾何を通じて表現されうるという仮定である。例えば、N =2SU(2) gauge 理論の有効結合定数(と長距離相関関数) は補佐的な楕円曲線 Eu の modular 変数 τ(u) を用いて表される: y2 =(x − u)(x2 − Λ4). (1) ここで u = hTrφ2i は真空の moduli 空間を label する。 u-plane θ(u) 4πi Eu: τ(u)= 2π + e2(u) vacuum 図 1: N =2SU(2) gauge 理論の moduli 空間。 物理から幾何、また逆に幾何から物理への変換を理解するのに必要不可欠な道具は D-brane である。D-brane に関し ての良い点は以下の二つである: (1) D-brane の上に弦が端点を持つので、いくつかの D-brane がお互いに重なるとその worldvolume 上に非可換 gauge boson が発生する。(2) D-brane は Ramond-Ramond 場の電荷を持っており、(適切な条 件の下で)弦理論における soliton として記述されうる。 (1) (2) 図 2: D-brane の二つの描像。(1) 開弦の端点としての D-brane、(2) 弦理論の soliton としての D-brane。 一般的な発想は、gauge 理論とそれに対応する soliton の背景を伝播する弦の理論を等しくするように、D-brane を用 いる、ということである。もし(IIB 型超弦理論で)N 枚の D3-brane が平坦な空間内でお互いに重なっていると、この 重なった brane は二つの記述法を持つ: 1. -
Mini-Symposium on String Theory and M-Theory
Mini-Symposium on String Theory and M-Theory Chair: Michael R. Douglas Duiliu-EmanuelDiaconescu JaumeGomis ChrisM.Hull AlbrechtKlemm Jos´eM.F.Labastida MarcosMarin˜ o NikitaNekrasov ChristophSchweigert AngelM.Uranga Duiliu-Emanuel Diaconescu Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton K-theory from M-theory Wednesday, 12.30 – 13.00, Room B I report on joint work with Gregory Moore and Edward Witten —“E8 Gauge Theory, and a Derivation of K-Theory from M-Theory”. It has become clear in recent years that type II string theories contain nonperturbative objects —called D-branes— which support gauge fields. From a more abstract point of view, D-brane charges are classified by K-theory classes of the space- time manifold X. Since D-branes are charged under Ramond-Ramond fields, E. Witten and then G. Moore and E. Witten proposed a K-theoretic interpretation of Ramond-Ramond fluxes themselves. This is more striking, as the RR fields are states in the perturbative closed string spectrum which a priori have no connection with vector bundles and K-theory. In the present work, we show that this proposal is consistent with M-theory. The main idea is a detailed comparison of the leading terms in the long distance partition function of M-theory and IIA string theory. The analysis relies heavily on index theory and homotopy theory techniques. It is found a precise agreement which confirms the internal consistency of M-theory, as well as the validity of the K-theoretic formalism in string theory. Jaume Gomis Caltech University D-branes in nongeometric phases of string theory Tuesday, 12.00 – 12.30, Room B Recent progress in string theory hinges upon our improved understanding of its nonperturbative states. -
Gravity, Gauge Theory and Strings
Les Houches - Ecole d'Ete de Physique Theorique 76 Unity from Duality: Gravity, Gauge Theory and Strings Les Houches Session LXXVI, July 30 - August 31, 2001 Bearbeitet von Constantin P. Bachas, Adel Bilal, Michael R. Douglas, Nikita A. Nekrasov, Francois David 1. Auflage 2003. Buch. xxxiv, 664 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 540 00276 5 Format (B x L): 15,5 x 23,5 cm Gewicht: 1220 g Weitere Fachgebiete > Technik > Verfahrenstechnik, Chemieingenieurwesen, Lebensmitteltechnik Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. Preface The 76th session of the Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics was devoted to recent developments in string theory, gauge theories and quantum gravity. As frequently stated, Superstring Theory is the leading candidate for a unified theory of all fundamental physical forces and elementary parti- cles. This claim, and the wish to reconcile general relativity and quantum mechanics, have provided the main impetus for the development of the the- ory over the past two decades. More recently the discovery of dualities, and of important new tools such as D-branes, has greatly reinforced this point of view. On the one hand there is now good reason to believe that the underlying theory is unique. On the other hand, we have for the first time working (though unrealistic) microscopic models of black hole mechan- ics. -
Gravitons Explained
Gravitons Explained By Clark M. Thomas © August 16, 2021 Abstract There are two totally different gravity paradigms within physics and astrophysics. Separate models of gravitons support each paradigm. These gravity paradigms could be called Tractor-Beam Gravity, and Push/Shadow Gravity. This introductory essay examines each paradigm, with a surprising winner. Tractor-Beam Gravity (TBG) embraces the currently popular model of gravitons. They are at the foundation of geometric General Relativity and string theories. This model has been embraced because its supporting ideas can appear elegant with carefully manipulated math. Once the correlative math has been reverse engineered from sketchy data to fit the general model – ideas of graviton tractor beams can emerge that are impossible to exclusively verify within all dimensions, even though popular publications have claimed as much for a century. Push/Shadow Gravity (PSG) has an older pedigree, going back to Nicolas Fatio, a friend of Newton, in the 17th century. As PSG was originally developed, using the idea of swarms of very tiny impactors, some mass-blocked, it was flawed and easy to refute. Toward the late 19th century the antique PSG model was ignored. It was soon to be superseded by emerging ideas involving Maxwellian electromagnetic fields, culminating with geometric !1 of 11! General Relativity and the truly weird realm of string theory maths. Even quantum field theory has joined the gravity game. Experimental particle physics (within lower-case relativity) examines phenomena inside some intermediate logarithmic dimensions. Explored energy realms are limited by the limited power of particle accelerators. At reality’s particulate limits the ultimate building blocks are much smaller – and combine to create matter worlds much larger than we could dimensionally verify with our instruments. -
ABCD of Instantons
ABCD of instantons Nikita NEKRASOV and Sergey SHADCHIN Institut des Hautes Etudes´ Scientifiques 35, route de Chartres 91440 – Bures-sur-Yvette (France) Juillet 2004 IHES/P/04/19 hep-th/0404225 IHES/P/04/19 ITEP-TH-17/04 ABCD of instantons Nikita Nekrasov1 and Sergey Shadchin Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques 35 route de Chartres, 91440 Bures-sur-Yvette, FRANCE email: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract We solve = 2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories for arbitrary N classical gauge group, i.e. SU(N), SO(N), Sp(N). In particular, we derive the prepotential of the low-energy effective theory, and the corresponding Seiberg-Witten curves. We manage to do this without resolving singularities of the compactified instanton moduli spaces. arXiv:hep-th/0404225 v2 6 May 2004 1on leave of absence from ITEP, Moscow, Russia Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Notationsandconventions . 4 2 =2 Super Yang-Mills 6 N 2.1 Thefieldcontentandtheaction . 6 2.2 Seiberg-Wittentheory . 7 2.3 Topologicaltwist ......................... 8 3 The prepotential 9 3.1 Five dimensional perspective . 9 3.2 Tracing over instanton moduli space . 11 3.2.1 Amodelexample ..................... 12 3.2.2 Backtoinstantons . 16 3.3 Fourdimensionallimit . 16 4 ADHM construction 17 4.1 SU(N)case ............................ 17 4.2 SO(N)case ............................ 20 4.3 Sp(N)case ............................ 22 5 Derivation of the prepotential 23 5.1 Five dimensional expression . 23 5.1.1 TheHaarmeasures . 23 5.1.2 The case of Bn and Dn .................. 25 5.2 Fourdimensionallimit . 26 5.3 Thecontourintegrals. 28 6 Seiberg-Witten data 31 7 Instanton corrections 36 7.1 Consistencycheck.