Inspection Report Of Hall Road over O’Leary Creek Bridge No. 411 Fillmore, California
Inspected for: County of Ventura Transportation Department
800 S. Victoria Ave Ventura, CA 93009
Inspected by:
Penfield & Smith
625 The City Drive South, Suite 200 Orange, CA 92868
Inspection Staff: Inspection Date: November 10, 2010 Gary Buelow Report Prepared by: Gary Buelow Ben Fischetti, PE Load Rating Calculations by: Report Reviewed by: Sam Xie, PE
Bridge Inspection of Bridge No. 411 Hall Road
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LOCATION MAP ...... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 2 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 2 3.0 INSPECTION FINDINGS ...... 3 3.1 Approach Roadway ...... 3 3.2 Traffic Safety Features ...... 3 3.3 Culvert ...... 3 3.4 Channel ...... 3 3.5 Signing & Markers ...... 4 3.6 Utilities ...... 4 4.0 LOAD RATING ...... 4 5.0 SCOUR AND UNDERCLEARANCE ...... 4 5.1 Scour Critical Bridge Identification Plan ...... 4 5.2 Underwater Inspection Identification Plan ...... 4 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 4 APPENDIX Appendix A – Photos Appendix B – Field Inspection Forms Appendix C – Previous Inspection Reports
Atkins i Inspection Date: 11-10-10 Bridge Inspection of Bridge No. 411 Hall Road
LOCATION MAP
Bridge No. 411
Br No. 411– Hall Road over O’Leary Creek Fillmore, California 625 the City Drive South, Suite 200 Orange, California 92868
Atkins 1 Inspection Date: 11-10-10 Bridge Inspection of Bridge No. 411 Hall Road
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Bridge No. 411, constructed in 1941, is a 10’-0” x 10’-0” x 45’-9” long RCB culvert with flared and warped wing walls, concrete lined floor (to the end of the wing walls) upstream and downstream. The two lane road Is AC paved over unspecified depth of fill. There is 6” x 6” timber rail mounted on 8” x 8” timber post. There are Type OM-3L/R markers at all four corners and Type OM2-1V markers with the bridge number at the approaches. O’Leary Creek is a medium to high flow well defined rock and boulder channel. There is pipe and wire on the south embankment and grouted rock on the north upstream embankment. There is pipe and wire on the north bank downstream. The embankments and bottom have heavy vegetation and trees.
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Based on the information gathered from the inspection and following NBIS standards, this structure is rated in overall Good Condition.
The bridge is rated using the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) rating system. The NBIS rating system requires the each element is rated as good, fair, or poor, and that each major feature receive an overall condition rating from zero to nine. A condition rating of zero signifies a failed condition. A condition rating of nine signifies an excellent condition. The condition of the deck, superstructure, and substructure was assessed using this system. The approach roadway alignment condition is based on the adequacy of the approach roadway alignment. A condition rating of 3 or less indicates the horizontal or vertical curvature requires a substantial reduction in the vehicle operating speed. A condition rating of 6 indicates a very minor speed reduction is required and a condition rating of 8 indicates no speed reduction is required. O’Leary Creek does not require scour critical inspection. The sufficiency rating formula evaluates highway bridge data by calculating four separate factors to obtain a numeric value which is indicative of the bridge sufficiency to remain open. Ratings range from 100 (entirely sufficient) to 0 (entirely insufficient or deficient). Bridge No. 411 Sufficiency Rating was calculated at 76.59. Load Rating Analysis is not required.
Atkins 2 Inspection Date: 11-10-10 Bridge Inspection of Bridge No. 411 Hall Road
3.0 INSPECTION FINDINGS
3.1 Approach Roadway Item 72 Code: 8
Approach alignment is on a slight curve to the left advancing north with dirt and gravel shoulders. There are no concrete approach slabs. The AC wear surface is in good condition (Appendix A Photo 1).
3.2 Traffic Safety Features Item 36 Code: 0 0 0 0
There is 6” x 6” timber rail mounted on 8” x 8” timber post (Appendix A Photos 1, 7 and 8). This type of railing does not meet County or Federal standards and should be replaced with MBGR per County standards.
3.3 Culvert Item 62 Condition Rating:
10’-0” x 10’-0” x 45’-9” long RCB culvert could not be observed due to heavy vegetation. Ladder access to channel is necessary to review. No condition rating is assigned.
3.4 Channel Item 61 Condition Rating: 6
O’Leary Creek is a medium to high flow well defined rock and boulder channel. There is pipe and wire on the south embankment and grouted rock on the north upstream embankment. There is pipe and wire on the north bank downstream. The embankments and bottom have heavy vegetation and trees.
Atkins 3 Inspection Date: 11-10-10 Bridge Inspection of Bridge No. 411 Hall Road
3.5 Signing & Markers Item 70 Posting Code: 5
There is Type OM2-1V roadway markers (with bridge number) at the approach ends of the timber railing (Appendix A Photo 1). There are Type OM-3L/R markers at all four corners of the railings (Appendix A Photo 1). There are No load rating postings.
3.6 Utilities There are overhead power lines on the east side of the roadway (Appendix A Photo 1).
4.0 LOAD RATING The current load rating (1971) for this culvert is as follows: Inventory: HS 20 Operating: HS 33 Permit: PPPPP (Purple) No Load Rating Analysis required
5.0 SCOUR AND UNDERCLEARANCE There is some evidence of embankment scour on the downstream side.
5.1 Scour Critical Bridge Identification Plan Not required
5.2 Underwater Inspection Identification Plan Not required
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Replace timber post and railings with MBGR. Estimated Priority Item Cost Code
Replace timber post and railings with MBGR (150 LF) $10,000 3
Total: $10,000
Priority Codes
0 – Emergency, Prompt Action Required 2 – Medium Priority 1 – High Priority 3 – Low Priority
Note: Costs shown are rough estimate for budget purpose and do not include mobilization, demolition, maintenance and protection of traffic, engineering or administrative costs.
Atkins 4 Inspection Date: 11-10-10 Bridge/Culvert Sufficiency Rating
Bridge Bridge Date Date of Sufficiency Number Type Constructed Sufficiency Rating Rating 411 RCB 1926 3/28/2011 76.59
Notes: 1 2 3 1. Structural Adequacy and Safety (S1)
Calculated S1 (Bridge) Calculated S1 (Culvert)
S1 Maximum 55% 0.00 41.9
Item Codes Description Rating (1-5 or N) A 59 Superstructure n 0 60 Substructure n 0 62 Culverts 5 10 Min Value of 59 & 60 0 IR B 66 Inventory Rating 27.9 3.1 (MS Loading)
(Note: 5 being best, 1 being worst) 2. Serviceability and Functional Obsolescence (S2)
Calculated S2
S2 Maximum 30% 20
Item Codes Description Rating (1-5 or N) A thru F 28 Lanes on structure 2 29 Avg Daily Traffic (ADT) 300 32 Appr. Rdwy Width 8.53 43 Structure Type, Main 51 Bridge Rdwy. Width 8.53 53 VC over deck 58 Deck Conditions A 5 1 67 Structural Evaluation B 4 3 68 Deck Geometry C 5 1 69 Underclearances D 5 1 71 Water Adequacy E 4 3 72 Appr. Rdwy Alignment F 5 1 100 STRAHNET Highway Designation
2a. Rating Reductions (Maximum 13%) J 10 2b. Width of Roadway Insufficiency (Maximum 15%)
If (Item 51+0.6 meters) < Item 32, then 5 G 0 Set to 0
X (ADT/Lane) 150 Y (Item 51/Item 28) 4.265
One lane Bridge When Item 28=01 H Rating for One lane Bridge if Y < 4.3 then H = 15 if Y >= 4.3 < 5.5 then H = 15(5.5-Y/1.2) Y >= 5.5 then H = 0
Two Lane Bridge if Y <2.7 and X > 50 then 15 H 0 if Y <2.7 and X <= 50 then 7.5 if Y >= 2.7 & x<= 50 then H=0
if X > 50 but <= 125 and if Y < 3.0 then H=15 if Y >= 3.0 < 4.0 then H=15(4-Y) if Y >= 4.0 < 4.0 then H=0
if X > 125 but <= 375 and 0 if Y < 3.4 then H=15 if Y >= 3.4 < 4.3 then H=15(4.3-Y) if Y >= 4.3 then H=0
if X > 375 but <= 1350 and if Y < 3.7 then H=15 if Y >= 3.7 < 4.9 then H=15((4.9-Y)/1.2) if Y >= 4.3 then H=0
if X > 1350 and if Y < 4.6 then H=15 if Y >= 4.6 < 4.9 then H=15((4.9-Y)/1.2) if Y >= 4.3 then H=0
2c. Vertical Clearance Insufficiency I0 This percentage is 0% for all structures
(Note: 5 being best, 1 being worst) 3. Essentiality for Public Use (S3)
Calculated S3
S3 Maximum 15% 14.70
Item Codes Description 19 Detour Length 5 29 Avg Daily Traffic (ADT) 300 100 STRAHNET Highway 0 Designation
3a. Determine:
K= S1 + S2 K 0.24 85 3b. Calculate:
A= 15(#29(ADT)X#19(Detour Length A 0.30 320,000 x K
B= STRAHNET Highway Designation B 0 4. Special Reductions (S4)
S4 Maximum 13% Calculated S4 (note: use when s1 + S2 + S3 >= 50) 76.59 0
Item Codes Description 19 Detour Length 10 36 Traffic Safety Features 1111 43 Structure Type 19
4a. Calculate:
A= (Item 19)4 X (7.9 x 10‐9) A 0.0001
4b. Struct type is either a bridge (timber/conc) or cu B0
4c. Traffic Safety Feature C 0 If 2 didgits of #36 = 0 , C = 1% If 3 didgits of #36 = 0 , C = 2% If 4 didgits of #36 = 0 , C = 3%
APPENDIX A PHOTOS
Appendix A Photos
1 Roadway Looking North
2 Upstream View of Culvert
Appendix A Photos
3 Downstream Culvert Railing and Parapet Wall
4 Downstream Culvert Floor
Appendix A Photos
5 Upstream View
6 Downstream View
Appendix A Photos
7 Timber & Railing on Upstream side
8 Timber & Railing on Downstream side
Appendix A Photos
APPENDIX B Field Inspection Forms
Appendix B Field Inspection Forms
Site Data 1 INITIAL BASELINE BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD REPORT PG 1 Structure ID Inspection Date 8 41190 111010
Hall RdOver O'Leary Creek (Fillmore)
16 Latitude 34Deg 23Min 10Sec
17 Longitude 118Deg 59Min 25Sec
Structure Type: 43 Main 1 1 9 RCB (Not Verified) 45 # Spans 001 43a 43b
44 Approach 0 0 0 None 46 # Spans 0000 44a 44b
Inspected by: Gary Buelow & Ben Feschetti
Weather Conditions: Clear/Warm Temp: 72
7 Facility Carried By Struct. Hall Rd
9 Nearest Intersection Hall Rd/Telegraph Rd is 0.5 Mile South
Bridge Signing Verification: Posted Speed Limit Not Posted Optional Reminder: Check boxes if Maintenance Activities are needed SIGNING IN FIELD Is Sign Near Bridge Site Far Type of Sign Comments Required ? Advance Near Far Advance Bridge Yes / No
Weight Limit Tons
Except Combination Tons
One Truck At A Time Yes / No
Vert. Clearance - On Yes / No
Vert. Clearance - Yes / No Under One Lane Bridge Yes / No
Narrow Bridge Yes / No
Hazard Clearance Yes / No
Other Type OM-3 L/R 4 Corners Other OM2-IV (with Bridge Number) Approach Sides Only (2 Total) KEY: OK: Signs properly installedM: Signs missing D: Signs Damaged or Incorrect
Signing Notes:
PBSJ BMS Form ACC2008 Site Data 2 INITIAL BASELINE BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD REPORT PG 2 Structure ID Inspection Date 8 41190 111010
36 Traffic Safety Features
36a 0 Bridge Railing 6X6 Timber Rail with 8X8 Timber Posts 36 L.F. Along South Side (Good Condition)
15 L.F. Along North Side
36b 0 Transition Timber Rail
36c 0 Approach Guardrail Timber Rail with Timber Posts
36 L.F. Approach at NE Corner
None at SW Approach
36d 0 Approach Rail Ends None
32 Approach Roadway Width 20 33 Bridge Median 0 34 Skew Angle 37 35 Structure Flared 0
72 Approach Alignment 7 Tangent Between Reversing Curves
Approach Roadway
Pavement AC Pavement is in Good Condition
Drainage None
Approach Slab None
Bump at Bridge? YesX No Steep Grade at Crest of Vertical Curve `
Pav't. Relief Joint None Deck Data 1 INITIAL BASELINE BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD REPORT PG 3 Structure ID Inspection Date 8
68 Deck Geometry
107 Deck Structure Type
Wearing Surface Thickness
108 Wearing Surface / Protective System ABC
47 Total Horiz Clr
48 Length of Max. Span
49 Structure Length
51 Bridge Roadway Width, Curb to Curb
52 Deck Width, Out to Out
ADT ADT YEAR 29 30
26 Functional Classification 28
50a Left Curb or Sidewalk Width
50b Right Curb or Sidewalk Width
53 Minimum Vertical Clearance Over
54a 54b 54 Min Vert Clearance Under Bridge 54a Ref. Feature
56 Minimum Lateral Clear on Left
55 Minimum Lateral Clear on Right
69 Underclearance Appraisal Controlling: Horizontal Vertical Deck Data 2 INITIAL BASELINE BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD REPORT PG 4 Structure ID Inspection Date 8 41190 111010
58 Deck Estimated Spalls or Delamination % Est Chloride Content Top
Underside
Exp. Joint
Deck Drainage Superstructure Data 1 INITIAL BASELINE BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD REPORT PG 5 Structure ID Inspection Date 8 90
59 Superstructure
Girders / Beams
Floorbeams
Stringers
Diaphragms
Truss Members
Portals / Bracing
Bearings
Drainage System (Below Deck) Superstructure DATA 2 INITIAL BASELINE BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD REPORT PG 7 Structure ID Inspection Date 8 90
Paint Condition
Interior Beam / Girder
Fascias
Splash Zone Truss / Girder
Truss
Bearings
Other
Estimate Remaining Life BMS to Calculate Yes/No Comments
Recalculate IR/ORYes Due to: Deterioration New Wearing Surface Other
No Previous Rating Dated is still valid
66 IR
64 OR H HS ML-80 MLC Other Other HS Load Factor
65 Rate Meth Typ Mem AASHTO Spec Manual
70 Bridge Post Controlling: H HS ML-80 Engineering Judgement
67 Structural Condition Appraisal Based Upon Table 1 29-ADT ADT Year
or 62-Culvert
91 Next Insp Freq
Spec Insp Type By Date
is bridge over water? Yes 62 =N
No 62 =N 61 =N 71 =N 113 =N Near Abutment Data INITIAL BASELINE BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD REPORT PG 8
Structure ID Inspection Date 890
60 Substructure NAB - Near Abutment Backwall
Bridge Seats
Cheekwalls
Stem
Wings
Footing
Piles
Scour / Undermine Yes No See Details on Form Sheet
Settlement
Embankment-Slope-Wall
Wall Drainage Far Abutment Data INITIAL BASELINE BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD REPORT PG9
Structure ID Inspection Date 890
60 Substructure FAB - Far Abutment Backwall
Bridge Seats
Cheekwalls
Stem
Wings
Footing
Piles
Scour / Undermine Yes No See Details on Form Sheet
Settlement
Embankment-Slope-Wall
Wall Drainage Pier Data INITIAL BASELINE BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD REPORT
Structure ID Inspection Date 890
60 Substructure Pier / Bent Number
Bridge Seats
Cap
Curtain Walls
Columns / Stems
Footing
Piles
Scour / Undermine Yes No See Details on Form Sheet
Settlement Culvert 1 Data INITIAL BASELINE BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD REPORT PG3 Structure ID Inspection Date 8 41190 111010
ADT ADT YEAR 28 Lanes On & Under 000229 NONE30 NONE
68 Deck Geometry 6 Table 2 A 26 Functional Classification
108 Wearing Surface / Protective System 600 AC Wearing Surface Thickness 3"
47 Total Horiz Clr 23 50 Curb or Sidewalk Width 10"
48 Length of Max. Span 10 51 Struct. Roadway Width, Curb to Curb 23
49 Structure Length 46 52 Deck Width, Out to Out 24
53 Minimum Vertical Clearance Over 0 00 0
54a 54b
62 Culverts 7 10' X 10' X 45'-9" RCB
Top Slab Not Observed, Cover Varies Minimum 1' to 3' +/-? Estimated
Barrel Upstream End in Good Condition; Downstream Not Observed
Floor / Paving Heavy Abrasion, Exposed Rebar Bad Condition
Headwall Upstream Parapet in Good Condition; Downstream Not Observed
Wings Upstream Wing at North Wall in Good Condition
Settlement
Debris Barrel Appears Clean at Upstream End Culvert 2 Data INITIAL BASELINE BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD REPORT Structure ID Inspection Date 8 41190 111010
Additional Culvert Notes: Very Little Traffic, Dead End Road - No Load Rating
No Access to Channel (Steep Banks)
Invert Should be Repaired
No Load Rating Required.
Recalculate IR/ORYes Due to: Deterioration New Wearing Surface Other
No X Previous Rating Dated 1971is still valid
66 IR
64 OR H HS ML-80 MLC Other Other HS Load Factor
65 Rate Meth Typ Mem AASHTO Spec Manual
70 Bridge Post Controlling: H HS ML-80 Engineering Judgement
67 Structural Condition Appraisal Based Upon Table 1 29-ADT ADT Year
or 62-Culvert
91 Next Insp Freq 2 4
Spec Insp Type By Date
is bridge over water? Yes 62 =N
X No 62 =N 61 =N 71 =N 113 =N CHANNEL DATA INITIAL BASELINE BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD REPORT Structure ID Inspection Date 890411 111010
Hall Rd Over O'Leary Creek
Scour Critical Rating No. of Units Insp. 113 8 based on: X Observed Scour Scour Calculation
Streambed Material Soil/Boulders/Cobble
61 Channel / Channel Protection - Cond. Rating 8 Channel Well Defined Rock and Boulder Channel, Sufficient for Normal Flow, High Velocity. Pipe and Wire on South Bank and Grouted Rock on North Bank Upstream. Pipe and Wire on North Bank Upstream.
Banks See Description Above.
Streambed Movements None
Debris, Vegetation Dense Brush & Trees Upstream & Downstream. Old Woody Debris Downstream Causing Obstruction.
River (Stream) Control Devices None
Embankment / Streambed Controls None
Drift, Other None
71 Waterway Adequacy
Risk of Overtopping X Remote Slight Occasional Frequent
Traffic Delay X Insignificant Significant Severe26 Functional Class.
High Water Mark: ELEV: Date New HW Mark HW since last Insp.
Weather Conditions: Clear INITIAL BASELINE BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Waterway 2 Data Structure ID U.W. Inspection Date 890
Substructure Foundation Water ObservedU.W. Insp Observed Counter Unit Type Depth Scour Rating Performed Depth Measures
Findings
Substructure Foundation Water Observed U.W. Insp Observed Counter Unit Type Depth Scour Rating Performed Depth Measures
Findings
Substructure Foundation Water Observed U.W. Insp Observed Counter Unit Type Depth Scour Rating Performed Depth Measures
Findings
Substructure Foundation Water Observed U.W. Insp Observed Counter Unit Type Depth Scour Rating Performed Depth Measures
Findings
Substructure Foundation Water Observed U.W. Insp Observed Counter Unit Type Depth Scour Rating Performed Depth Measures
Findings
Substructure Foundation Water Observed U.W. Insp Observed Counter Unit Type Depth Scour Rating Performed Depth Measures
Findings
Substructure Foundation Water Observed U.W. Insp Observed Counter Unit Type Depth Scour Rating Performed Depth Measures
Findings
Substructure Foundation Water Observed U.W. Insp Observed Counter Unit Type Depth Scour Rating Performed Depth Measures
Findings DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 625 The City Drive South, Suite 200 STRUCTURAL QUANTITY SURVEY AND MARGINAL ESTIMATE (MAINTENANCE) Orange, CA 92868 DPD-OSD-D19 (REV.1/78)
CHARGE |EX AUTH| BR. NO. 411 BRIDGE HALL ROAD OVER O'LEARY CREEK TYPE RCB DISTRICT 8 |COUNTY| Ven ROUTE KP Rec'd Est Group By Date LENGTH (FT) 10.00 WIDTH (FT) 45.00 DEPTH 8.00 LL Quantity By G. Buelow Date 7/11/2011 LONG SPAN| 10 |SPANS| 1 SKEW 37.000 Checked By L. Khaleghi Date 7/11/2011 DESIGN SECTION| Box Culvert Revised By Date
CODE CONTRACT ITEMS UNIT SUPERSTRUCTURE SUBSTRUCTURE OTHER ELEMENTS TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT QUANTITY CHECK USE QUANTITY CHECK USE QUANTITY CHECK USE USE 832001 METAL BEAM GUARD RAILING LF 150 150 150 150 $27.00 $4,050 832003 METAL BEAM GUARD RAILING (WOOD POST) LF 140 140 140 140 $22.00 $3,080
SUB TOTAL $7,130 Revision MOBILIZATION @ 10% $713 Marginal Est. By SUB TOTAL CONTRACT ITEMS $7,843 Date CONTINGENCIES @ 20% $1,569 Cost Index 2010 2010 TOTAL $ 22.22 FT $9,412 FOR BUDGET PURPOSES - SAY $10,000
APPENDIX C Previous Inspection Reports
Appendix C Previous Inspection Reports
COUNTY OF VENTURA
SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT # S-5
County Bridge No. 411 Other No. Date of Investigation: 3/04/93
Road Name: Hall Road Facility Crossed: O'Leary Creek Br. Log Mile: 0.50 Log Mile 0.00 at: Telegraph Road Advancing: North Area: Fillmore (SSP) Previous Report: S-4 Dated: 3/29/91 Previous Recommended Work: Done: None: X Not Done:
Condition: Same as last report. Structure appears to be in good condition.
- Recommendations: None
M. Brown Sheet of
COUNTY OF VENTURA SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT
County Bridge No. 411 Other No- Date of 1nvestigation3-3-87
Road Name Hall Road Facility Crossed OILeary Creek
Br- Log Mile 0.50 Log Mile 0.00 at Teleqraph Road Advancing north Area Fillmore
Previous Report 3-2 Dated 3-1-84 Previous Recommended Work: - Done; 2 None; - Not Done Condition:
- Structure is in good condition.
Recommendations:
None. Sheet of
COUNTY OF VENTURA
SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT S-4
County Bridge No, 411 Other No, Date of Investigation 3-21-91
I.. . - Road Name Hall Road' Facility Crossed O'Leary Creek
Br- Log Mile 0.50 Log Mile 0-00 at Tel,(S.H.ecrra~h 126)Rd. Advancing North Area (SSP
Previous Report S-3 Dated 3-1-87 Previous Recommended Work: - Done; .xNone; - Not Done Condition:
Structure is in good condition.
Recommendations:
None
photos taken Sheet of- 1 .
COUNTY OF VENTURA SUPPUMENTARY BRIDGE RE PORT
County Bridge No. 411 Other No. ------
Date of Investigation 8-25-82
Road Name' Hall Facility Crossed O'Leary Cr.
Br. Log Mile 0-50 Log Mile 0.00 at Telegraph Road Advanc ing Area Fillmore
(1) .The concrete invert has been partially broken away.
(2) Reinforcing steel is both exposed and broken. .--4~. (3) The invert has been undermined approximately 3' on either side of the broken section. (see attached sketch and pictures) a * Recommendations:
(1) Break off undermined portion of the concrete invert.
(2) Back fill with gravel and repair concrete invert.
ridge ~ngineeL
C
VE TURA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SHEET-~F- 1 I PROJECT PRjocZh~$(gl/ ~%LLRQ. JOB No FILE NO COUNTY OF VENTURA Bridge No. 411 SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT , Area Fillmore
FA Route and P.M. N/A
Date of Investigation 5/3/79
Name Hall Road (0' Leary Creek)
CONDITION RATING: APPRAISAL RATING;
Deck Superstructure Substructure Overall
Channel & Channel Protection Retaining Walls
Widenable? Yes El NO n Conditional
Condition:
1) Concrete in F.L. on north side of invert has been as much as 5" in depth. Some reinforcing wire is
2) Downstream channel has been eroded to 11' below approach . -i F.L. of channel. 3) Downstream is now 7' below toe of riprap at end of riprap channel section.
Recommendation :
1) Check Item No. 1 under dry conditions, and determine extent of necessary repairs. COUNTY OF VENTURA BridgeNo. 411 SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT (1/76) Area Fi1 1 more FA Route and P.M. N/A
Date of Investigation 11/23/76
Name Hal 1 Road (0' Leary Creek) CONDITION RATING: APPRAISAL RATING:
Deck Superstructure Substructure Overall
Channel & Channel Protection Retaining Walls
Widenable? Yes n No 0 Conditional 0 CONDITION
1) Transverse cracks are present in paved invert at 6'+ intervals, 3/64" max., one smaller logitudinal crack is present in paved invert, less than 1/64".
RECOMMENDATION
None
~s-ceor rnvestlgatlon Srevious Recommended Work: None Done Not Done Remarks: None Do Prev Rec Work
Estimated Cost r Inspected byr a STRUCTURE IJORK RECORD
Road Name ALCIS BridgeNo.'+!l/ b ate Built contract No. 7 / 2 ‘1- 851 Plan NO. Design by Designer
'Contractor G,,T,, Lgc,.... - =, Inspection Cost of Work ok Design Load
Work Load I Sheet 1 of 1
COUNTY OF VENTURA SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT (S -4)
County Bridge No. 411 Other No. --- Date of Investigation 8/28/75
Road Name Hall Road Facility Crossed 0'~,earvCrd Br. Log Mile 0.50 Log Mile 0.00 at Sa He 126
Advanc ing North Area Fillmore Previous Report S-3 Dated 2/12/75 Weather Clear, 80°+
1. Downstream invert has been repaired and approximately 8" of new concrete has been poured over existing slab (see cross- . - section). 2. Approximately 100f+ of grouted riprap has been placed down- stream of structurg. 3. Behind S. E. wing wall grouted riprap has been placed for additional slope, protection
RECOMMENDATIONS: None. Sheet-- 1 of 1
COUNTY OF VENTURA SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT(5 -3)w
County Bridge No. 41 1 Other No. ""-. r~ w Date of Investigation 2/a/75
Road Name Hall Road Facility Crossed Brown Creek
Br. Log Mile 0.50 Log Mile 0.00 at Telegraph Road Advanc ing North Area Fillmore
Previous Report S -2 Dated 7/12/75 Weather Haze 60°+- CONDITION 1. Downstream invert slab missin'"%--approximate area 6' x 10'. RECOMMENDATION &t!?$Y - 1. Repair invert and outlet with riprap to provide protection of -J wingwall footings. Cost: $300.00
5 chard S. You ridge Engineer Bridge Inspector mks Sheet 1 of 1
COUNTY OF VENTURA
SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE RE PORT (s-2 )
County Bridge No. 411 Other No. --- Date of Investigation 7-12-73
Road Name Hall Road Facility Crossed Creek l3r . Log Mile 0.50 Log Mile 0.00 at Road Advanc ing North kea Fillmore Previous report 10-8-71 CS-1)
Condition 1. Patching was done and is holding well. 2. Grouted rock was placed at N.W. channel bank to channel flow into structure. Looks good.
Recommendations None
u )-e ieh--x,4- W. . O'Connell a-C.. Bridge Inspector STRUCTURE WORK RECORD
Road Name Hall Rd. Bridge No. 411 Date Bui 1t Contract No. Plan No. Design by Designer
Contractor COW~ Forces Inspecti on Cost of Work $494.35 Design Load Sheet-- 1 of 1
COUNTY OF VENTURA . --- - SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT (S- 1)
- County Bridge No. 411 Other No. Date of Investigation 10/8/71
Road Name Hall Road Facility Crossed Brown Creek
Br. Log Mile 0.50 Log Mile 0.00 at Telegraph- Road kdvanc ing North Area Fillmore 31 Previous Report 2/2/71 (original)
CONDITION: 1. Same as stated in original report.
- RECOMMENDATIQNS: 7 1. Same as stated in original report (patch rock pockets)
i 12- R. Acosta Sheet 1 of 3
COUNTY OF VENTURA BRIDGE RE PORT
This Report Supersedes County Bridge No. 411 all Previous Reports for this Bridge Number Other No. Date of Investigation 7/2/71
Road Name Hall Road Facility Crossed Brown Creek Br . Log Mile 0.50 Log Mile 0.00 at Telegraph Road 0 Advanc ing North Area Fillmore General Description: . - Stmctirre 10' x 10' R.C.B. on steep slope
Waterway Well defined rock and boulder channel. Sufficient for normal flow. ~ecocityhigh. Pipe and wire on South Bank
, and grouted rock on north bank upstream, pipe and wire on north bank downstream. 20 ' -6" PMS w/2 ' dirt shldrs. Approaches : No . Lane s 2 Width & Type PMS has a seal coat Reflectors 3-1/2" x 7-1/2"yellow strip on 6"x6" timber posts. Vertical at crest of V.C. with Horizontal Tangent between lignment reversin? curves. Future 19- Sheet 2 of 3
CULVERT DATA County Bridge No. 411 '. 16' b/b on Number of Barrels One Spanrdwv. CL Height /Q P /t3g~
Length 45 ' - 9" Depth of Cover 2 ' - 7' Skew47 Okp"> Timber guardrail east Roadway Width 22' - 6" Between and R.C. curb west Sidewalks or Traffic Curbs No S.W. only 10" R.C. headwall curbs. Overhead C Learance Unimpaired Railings Single 6" x 6" timber rail on 8" x8" timber post. z, .
- Deck R.C. (12")
Walls R.C. 10" (pst)
Pier Walls None
Bottom Concrete
Cutoff Walls None
Wingwalls, etc. 9"R.C.
Condition of Structure See Attachment A
Recommendat ion See Attachment A Sheet 2 of 3
BRIDGE DATA County Bridge No. . - - Deck Width O/O
Total Length b/b Skew Roadway Width Between
?.
Sidewalks Overhead Clearance Trusses Abutments
0 b Piers - I
Deck Supports
Wingwalls, etc.
Condition of Structure
Recommendations HI STORY County Bridge No. 411
Date Built 1941 By Contract Contract No. - Designed by County Surveyor Designer County Plans 32289 Bridge R.E . Surveyor Contractor County Surveyor
REMARKS
Permit Capacity Purple XXElUd Load Capacity Legal a$ 3 DATE Posting .F/~,+,.E 1 BY POSTED
Signe Etle Reg. Engr. RCE No. 18481 Dafe February 2, 19 71 .
Date of Next Review February 1972 CHANNEL CROSS SECTION RECORD
Road Name \ Rohrz Bridge No. A\\ Feature Crossed D' LEARY CREEK Channel Measurements from Top CURB to @HANNEL bpl"r~-~ Date FEB. 2 19 7\
Initial 3.R. ~\c~~ER%OM
(Diagram to be varied and drawn as appropriate for each structure). CHANNEL CROSS SECTION RECORD
* Road Name Hal 1 Road Bridge No. 41 J - Feature Crossed Brown Creek Channel Measurements from top of curb to Date February 7, 19 71
NORT ti > 50u-7- !4 Initial J, R, DickersoL
UPSTREAM €E€VAT:\~N No SCALK
(Diagram to be varied and drawn as appropriate for each structure). STRUCTURE UTILITY RECORD
Road Name Hall Road Bridge No. 411 Sheet 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT "A1' . - CONDITION OF STRUCTURE RE PORT
Road Name ail Road County Bridge No. 411 Date of Investigation 2/2/71 CONDITION : There is a large area of exposed aggregate pockets in deck at downstream end. It is partially patched but needs repatching. There are two rock pocket areas approx. 6' to 7' above culvert floor on the south wall. The areas near the bottom of both walls are eroded exposing the aggregate. This is caused by the high velocity flow carrying a heavy rock load during high flows. The bottom is eroded 1/4" to 2" due to high velocity flow and heavy rock load. The wingwalls are chipped all along the edges but no exposed steel. There is some evidence of seepage on the south wall at the top from . . 2 ' to 4' frqm the downstream end. Appears to be at construction joint which has been patched.
RECOMMENDATIONS : Chi out and patch with epoxy mortar all rock pockets greater than 1/2P, depth. .Patch bottom of both walls with epoxy where heavily scoured.
ESTIMATE OF COST: Patch work $600
L+gAL"k&&&~=-.-/ ,,,' ,,,,' J. R. Dickerson v/ Reg. Engr. '18481 . BUILT L~Q- .!&' COST BR l DGE $ 34 $!@A:,,
- -- .------I&-&- *--I.------. + PLANS BY i CONSTRUCTION BY SUPERVISION BY - CONTRACT -----.-.c_s c s c S FORCE ACCOUNT -
, *OTt-lERS i
DESCRIPTION I @ / ... rLe, _Bk5.. LQS(LQ- X- 2% - - - - ....- ..
------..,-----.....-...-57 a skew CL EAR ROAD'!iAY A&FT,-..- IN. LENGTH ' /O-- -FT. . : -'-SPANS I - . . DEPTH OF COVER - - - FT,
GIRDERS NO -.- KIND ------DECK - ~~,R~,~-FL~!z------S IDEVlALKS NO. - - Wl DTH - - K IND&@HE- PAVING SLAG &)I( ------... - - - 0 RA 1L J~(126Z&, , , , , , , , , , CHANNEL PAVED BA,------CUT OFF WALL ~g>P-J 3: p& vv$~E&g&fi
LOAD LIMIT - - - L@_P~-----
L 0
Inventory date 144g Ventura County Br i dges
------