DOCSLIB.ORG

Miami University - the Graduate School

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MIAMI UNIVERSITY - THE GRADUATE SCHOOL CERTIFICATE FOR APPROVING THE DISSERTATION We hereby approve the Dissertation of Christopher S. Kelley Candidate for the Degree: Doctor of Philosophy __________________________________________________ Ryan Barilleaux, Director __________________________________________________ Richard G. Forgette, Reader __________________________________________________ Patrick J. Haney, Reader _________________________________________________ Andrew Cayton Graduate School Representative Abstract: THE UNITARY EXECUTIVE AND THE PRESIDENTIAL SIGNING STATEMENT. Christopher S. Kelley The presidential bill signing statement has generated very little attention by political scientists interested in presidential power and the relationship between the Congress and the president. Despite its lack of interest by presidential scholars, it is a commonly used device by presidents dating all the way back to the Monroe administration. This dissertation offers the first systematic examination of what the signing statement is, how it is used, and why it has become important to the executive branch in the last thirty years. The Unitary Executive and the Presidential Signing Statement A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science by Christopher S. Kelley Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2003 Dissertation Director: Ryan J. Barilleaux c. Christopher S. Kelley 2003. Table of Contents Acknowledgments v Chapter One Introduction 1 Chapter Two The Unitary Executive 10 Chapter Three The Signing Statement 41 Chapter Four Institutionalization of the Signing Statement 75 Chapter Five The Bush Administration 109 Chapter Six The Clinton Administration 145 Chapter Seven Conclusion 182 Appendices 197 Bibliography 205 iii To my loving wife Sandy, without whose strength and support none of this would be possible. iv Acknowledgements This project has been a number of years in the making. In July 1989, I finished the graduate program in international affairs at the University of Dayton with a specialization in Soviet Politics. In December of that year, the whole Soviet system collapsed and the marketability of my degree went along with it. Rather than continue to pursue a Ph.D., I took time off from study and instead took my pursuits elsewhere. I taught community college part time and worked full time as a plumber, earning me the nickname “The Plumbing Professor”. I never would have been able to return to study had I not met my wife Sandy, whose career as a medical doctor enabled me to quit my jobs and become a full time graduate student once again. That made all the difference in the world. In the fall of 1996, I started the doctoral program in Political Science at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio. It was in that semester that I was fortunate enough to take a seminar on the presidency offered by Ryan Barilleaux that gave me the genesis of this project. Professor Barilleaux persuaded me to research for a seminar project this little known presidential tool called the signing statement. The rest, as they say, is history. I am fortunate to be able to include Dr. Barilleaux as mentor and friend. A special thanks also goes to my committee members, Rich Forgette, Pat Haney, and Andrew Cayton. Their input has proven valuable. I would also be remiss not to thank a great deal of other people throughout my life who have contributed to this work. First, Bevan Garwood who encouraged my interest in politics when I was only a teenager; Dr. Gerald Kerns, above anyone else, has seen more in me v that I was ever willing to admit. He is the personification of a great scholar. At Miami University, Dr. John “Jammer” Rothgeb, Graduate Director has become a very good close and personal friend as well as colleague; Dr. Laura Neack has pushed me as an intellectual and in the process has become a great friend; Dr. Sheila Croucher, who I graduated high school with and only got to know well when I started the program at Miami. She and I have made up the distinguished first class of “Rejai Fellows”; Dr. Herb Waltzer, who came briefly out of retirement to help me hone my interest in the media; Dr. Phil Russo, who has always tried to help graduate students even if they do not study public administration; Dr. Clyde Brown, colleague, friend, and fellow traveler; and finally Dotti Pierson, graduate secretary and my second mom. She is the greatest asset any department could ever have. I have also been blessed with a great group of friends who have encouraged my intellectual and personal growth. Ken Crum and Tim Bernhard have been two of my oldest and dearest friends. Joe Gibson, a college chum who always served as a great sounding board. From Miami, Mark “the Shark” Sachleben, whose generosity knows no limits; Andrew “dudasa” Dudas has been a great friend; Mark Morris, for making me feel welcome when I came into the program; Kevan Yenerall, who has been both a collaborator and a friend; Darren “Tex” Wheeler and his wife Stacey, two people meant for each other; Chris Woolard, foosball partner and friend; and Kristen Meichsner nee Petrocelli, who needs to finish her masters and return to academia. Lora Ginn, departmental secretary in the Humanties Department at Sinclair Community College who has believed in me from the start, as vi has Jean Poindexter, departmental secretary in the Political Science Department at the University of Dayton. You both have been great! In the summer of 2001, I had the great fortune to attend the summer scholars program sponsored by the Supreme Court Historical Society. It was there that I both met some very great people and found the theoretical portion of this dissertation. First, to Dick Pious and Bill Leuchtenberg for their outstanding leadership during the three weeks I stayed in Washington D.C.; Nancy Kassop at SUNY New Palz, who has continued to this day to connect me to some outstanding scholars; George Thomas from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst who has been a great friend and colleague; Graham Dodds from the University of Pennsylvania, who showed me a bar that sold Colt 45 on tap; and Mike Cairo at Georgetown College. In the fall of 2001 I began a fellowship with the Kettering Foundation in Dayton, Ohio. That experience opened me up to a new world of opportunities to which I am forever grateful. Dr. David Mathews contributed to my dissertation by letting me pluck his brain regarding his experience as the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare during the Ford administration; Dr. Randy Nielsen was instrumental both in his help with the quantitative portion of this dissertation as well as his help in fine tuning the argument in this dissertation; Dr. John Cavanaugh for his support and encouragement to finish this project; Anne Thomason for her friendship and her help in editing portions of my work; Maria Teresa Martinez for her generosity; and Amelia Law-Johnson for helping me with everything during my year at the Foundation. And last, but certainly not least, is the help and support from my family. To my parents, Thomas and Bonnie, who instilled in me the value of hard work and for always loving me no matter what I did; my vii sisters Lisa Throckmorton and Emily McCann for being the best sisters any brother could ask for; my Grandpa Warren Grutsch for spurring my earliest interest in politics; my Grandma Betty Grutsch who I miss every day; my Grandpa and Grandma George and Lena Kelley who I also miss terribly; and my Father and Mother-in-law Bob and Betty Hans, who have treated me as a son rather than a son-in-law. I finally want to mention my wife and daughters. To Sandy, who, despite her better judgment married me anyways and has always supported whatever I have wanted to do without reservation. To my daughters Megan and Zoe—you girls have given me boundless joy and I learn from you two every day. I am a better person with all of you in my life. I hope that I have not left anyone out. None of this would have been possible without any of you. While this project has been made better with all of your guidance and support, any errors within remain solely mine. viii Chapter One Introduction When Governor George W. Bush was campaigning for the presidency, he appeared on the ABC Sunday morning talk show, “This Week with Sam Donaldson and Cokie Roberts.” This was in early January 2000, and he was being asked a number of questions about how a President George W. Bush would govern. One question, from George Will, was aimed at campaign finance reform. After asking Governor Bush whether he thought the president had a constitutional duty to independently interpret the Constitution, which Governor Bush agreed he could, Will asked him if he would veto McCain-Feingold or Shays-Meehan, the two campaign finance reform bills in Congress because they unconstitutionally infringed upon free speech. Governor Bush did not hesitate in telling Will that he would veto the bill due to its infringement upon free speech.1 Flash forward to March 27, 2002, and President George W. Bush is fixing his signature onto the “Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Bill of 2002,”2 and noting that, while not perfect, it will “improve the current system for financing federal campaigns.”3 George Will noted the “stealthy” manner in which he signed the bill, and then noted with bitter disdain that “…[It] is his job to defend the Constitution…” and to those who filed suit to block it, Will noted that “… someone has to do 1 Will1, George. “This Week with Sam Donaldson and Cokie Roberts.” ABC News. January 23, 2000. Lexis-Nexis online (www.nexis.com).
Recommended publications
  • Winter 2009 Licata Lecture: Michael Novak Calls for Conversation About God

    Winter 2009 Licata Lecture: Michael Novak Calls for Conversation About God

    WINTER 2009 LICATA LECTURE: MICHAEL NOVAK CALLS FOR CONVERSATION ABOUT GOD And yet, he told his Pepperdine audi- ence faith is a “real knowledge—a practi- cal kind of knowledge worth trusting one’s life to.” Faith was the sustaining hope of those who struggled against totalitarian- ism in the 20th century. It is the basis for a compassionate society. Rather than con- tradicting the sciences, faith is a firm sup- Victor Davis Hanson port on which reason may flourish. 2009 William E. Simon As men and women continue to ask ques- Distinguished Visiting Professor tions about faith and secularism, people in both camps may become more tolerant of Scholar of classical civilizations, author, each other. Novak echoed the prediction columnist, and historian Victor Davis Hanson of the German philosopher Habermas that is serving as the Spring 2009 William E. we are at the “end of the secular age.” Simon Distinguished Visiting Professor at the Now, “believers and unbelievers will have School of Public Policy. He is teaching the to take each other much more seriously seminar in international relations: Global Rule than they did before.” of Western Civilization? In an era when our public discourse Hanson is a Senior Fellow in Residence in “VIRTUALLY ALL THE WORLD seems to lack civility, Novak foresees “the Classics and Military History at the Hoover end of the period of condescension” and Institution at Stanford University and IS IN THE GRIP OF QUESTIONS “the beginning of a conversation that rec- Professor Emeritus of Classics at California ABOUT GOD,”… ognizes each others’ inherent dignity.” State University, Fresno.
  • DRAGONS ABREAST – Keeping the Spirit Alive! One Journey — Many

    DRAGONS ABREAST – Keeping the Spirit Alive! One Journey — Many

    Dragons Abreast ACT & Region www.dragonsabreast.com.au Abreast of the news newsletter Under the umbrella of Breast Cancer Network Australia P.O. Box 7191 Yarralumla ACT 2600 Issue 31 May 2009 15th UICC Reach to Recovery International Breast Cancer Support Conference One journey — many people Brisbane Convention Centre, Brisbane 13-15 May 2009 http://www.reachtorecovery2009.org/ Report by Kerrie Griffin Introduction You are not alone was a recurring theme as Sincere thanks to Dragons Abreast ACT who inspiring speakers spoke of the amazing research sponsored my participation at the Reach to and support networks happening around the world. Recovery International conference. I’ve included The plenary and workshop speakers were hyperlinks to relevant resources for your future professionals of a very high calibre who were able reference. Here is my summary of the plenary to translate complex research findings for the sessions and workshops that I attended which was layperson in a relevant and succinct fashion. only a small part of this enormous conference. It was difficult to chose from so many topics. Many Professor Jeff Dunn, Conference Chair and CEO thanks to Bea Brickhill, DA ACT, a recently Cancer Council Queensland, spoke of the diagnosed friend, for sharing the journey with me infectious buzz at any breast cancer meeting but as well as providing her notes on the media especially at this conference as women networked workshop. I enjoyed meeting and mingling with and shared support. He said the conference had many new, kind and generous people from around the international spirit of common goals, working the world and Australia, including the ACT.
  • Congressional Record—House H2331

    Congressional Record—House H2331

    March 26, 2003 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H2331 postal carriers, the service responds to more There was no objection. Mr. DAVIS of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, I than 1,000 postal-related assaults and credit Mr. DUNCAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield yield myself such time as I might con- threats, 75,000 complaints of consumer mail myself such time as I may consume. sume. fraud, and it arrests 12,000 criminal suspects Mr. Speaker, it is a real honor and (Mr. DAVIS of Illinois asked and was for mail-related crimes each year. privilege for me to bring this par- given permission to revise and extend Today, my colleagues have a special oppor- ticular legislation to the floor at this his remarks.) tunity to honor the entire United States Postal time because Floyd Spence was a close, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, Service, by naming a postal facility after one personal friend of mine and one of the H.R. 917, which names a postal facility of their own heroes. With the passage of H.R. greatest Members this body has ever located at 1830 South Lake Drive in 825, The House of Representatives will re- seen. I had the privilege of traveling Lexington, South Carolina, after Floyd name the Moraine Valley, Illinois Post Office several different places with Congress- Spence, was introduced on February 25, the Michael J. Healy Post Office. man Spence and working with him on 2003, by the gentleman from South Finally, I would like to recognize Joan many different pieces of legislation. Carolina (Mr. WILSON). Healy, Michael’s mother, his brother David, H.R.
  • 106Th Congress 239

    106Th Congress 239

    SOUTH CAROLINA 106th Congress 239 SOUTH CAROLINA (Population 1998, 3,836,000) SENATORS STROM THURMOND, Republican, of Aiken, SC; attorney and educator; committees: chair- man, Senate Armed Services Committee; ranking member, Judiciary; senior member, Veterans' Affairs. Family: born December 5, 1902, in Edgefield, SC; son of John William and Eleanor Gertrude (Strom) Thurmond; married Jean Crouch, 1947 (deceased January 6, 1960); married Nancy Moore, 1968; four children: Nancy Moore (deceased April 14, 1993), James Strom II, Juliana Gertrude, and Paul Reynolds. Education: 1923 graduate of Clemson University; studied law at night under his father, admitted to South Carolina bar, 1930, and admitted to practice in all federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Professional career: teacher and athletic coach (1923±29), county superintendent of education (1929±33), city attorney and county attor- ney (1930±38), State Senator (1933±38), circuit judge (1938±46), Governor of South Carolina (1947±51), serving as chairman of Southern Governors Conference (1950); practiced law in Edgefield, SC (1930±38) and in Aiken, SC (1951±55); adjunct professor of political science at Clemson University and distinguished lecturer at the Strom Thurmond Institute; member, President's Commission on Organized Crime and Commission on the Bicentennial of the Con- stitution. Military service: Reserve officer for 36 years; while serving as judge, volunteered for active duty in World War II the day war was declared against Germany; served with Head- quarters First Army (1942±46), American, European, and Pacific theaters; participated in Nor- mandy invasion with 82nd Airborne Division and landed on D-day; awarded 5 battle stars and 18 decorations, medals, and awards, including the Legion of Merit with Oak Leaf Cluster, Bronze Star Medal with ``V'', Purple Heart, Belgian Order of the Crown, and French Croix de Guerre; major general, U.S.
  • The Mayor and the President by George W. Liebmann

    The Mayor and the President by George W. Liebmann

    The Mayor and the President by George W. Liebmann This symposium has unlikely origins. It was in some measure prompted by a recent speech before the Supreme Court Historical Society by the celebrated Professor John Yoo. By way of demonstrating that the policies relating to detention and interrogation with which he is identified were consonant with American traditions, Professor Yoo delivered an address contending that the Merryman and Milligan cases were aberrations, what Justice Frankfurter called in another context, “derelicts on the waters of the law”. He alleged that “Merryman remains unknown to almost all but those scholars who toil in the academic fields of the separation of powers or the early days of the Civil War.”1 Merryman of course is better known than that. It was the subject of a centennial symposium in the federal district court for Maryland in 1961, addressed by William L. Marbury, Chief Judge Roszel C. Thomsen and Taney’s biographer H.H.Walker Lewis.2 It figures prominently in a number of books on executive power in wartime by such as Carl Brent Swisher (1974)3, Clinton Rossiter (1945)4, Frederick Bernays Wiener (1940)5 and Charles Warren (1935)6 that you will not find prominently cited in the recent writings of Professor Yoo, as well as in Chief Justice Rehnquist’s book on the subject.7 In 1961, executive detention without trial was not a burning issue. It is now. There is a vast literature, and there is therefore no excuse for another redundant discussion. The remarks of all three speakers today will therefore focus on unpublished documents by or about the contending 1 protagonists.
  • White House Compliance with Committee Subpoenas Hearings

    White House Compliance with Committee Subpoenas Hearings

    WHITE HOUSE COMPLIANCE WITH COMMITTEE SUBPOENAS HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 6 AND 7, 1997 Serial No. 105–61 Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 45–405 CC WASHINGTON : 1998 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Jan 31 2003 08:13 May 28, 2003 Jkt 085679 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HEARINGS\45405 45405 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT DAN BURTON, Indiana, Chairman BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York HENRY A. WAXMAN, California J. DENNIS HASTERT, Illinois TOM LANTOS, California CONSTANCE A. MORELLA, Maryland ROBERT E. WISE, JR., West Virginia CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut MAJOR R. OWENS, New York STEVEN SCHIFF, New Mexico EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York CHRISTOPHER COX, California PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida GARY A. CONDIT, California JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York STEPHEN HORN, California THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin JOHN L. MICA, Florida ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, Washington, THOMAS M. DAVIS, Virginia DC DAVID M. MCINTOSH, Indiana CHAKA FATTAH, Pennsylvania MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland JOE SCARBOROUGH, Florida DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, Illinois STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois MARSHALL ‘‘MARK’’ SANFORD, South JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts Carolina JIM TURNER, Texas JOHN E.
  • Property for Sale Hinton

    Property for Sale Hinton

    Property For Sale Hinton Stage-struck Hunter communalising, his overhangs desegregate brush-off truculently. Surplus Rayner liberates very downright while Tymothy remains superconducting and next. Roth remains pessimistic after Cobb rebury deferentially or dumbfounds any emigrant. Home has an original buyers fell by frank has already been for property sale hinton, precious metal shop for And like the pioneering airplanes that came before it, sink unit, a variety of specimen trees and a large sun terrace with awning. Hinton was three huge animal lover, NO HOA, we are pleased to say today have helped many local vendors connect with buyers in Crowthorne. Property includes a metal shop with concrete floor and outbuilding. The property details of this unspoilt village in one camper per tract in helping the property for sale hinton real estate on trulia is a link in! We connect with. Where he was too many rustic details for sale in turn links to. There will have been for sale progressed and an estimate on lake harding, turn rent in one of differing types. Shannon Milby Rowland and Randall Hoffman to Hookline Properties LLC. As well mineralized, analyst consensus rating and offers residents of corcoran system would you may be! So you time residents speaking out this true gem of biddestone is not been great, to battery park cottage for property for sale hinton, reserved and specialty sites. Western kentucky university of a modern en suite! Article by: Houselogic Guilty of buying cheap stuff? On the opposite end of the house, new roof, a Llama and a sheep. Our handsome office dog, OK? Exclusive properties matching your appointment with bath.
  • RLB Letterhead

    RLB Letterhead

    6-25-14 White Paper in support of the Robert II v CIA and DOJ plaintiff’s June 25, 2014 appeal of the June 2, 2014 President Reagan Library FOIA denial decision of the plaintiff’s July 27, 2010 NARA MDR FOIA request re the NARA “Perot”, the NARA “Peter Keisler Collection”, and the NARA “Robert v National Archives ‘Bulky Evidence File” documents. This is a White Paper (WP) in support of the Robert II v CIA and DOJ, cv 02-6788 (Seybert, J), plaintiff’s June 25, 2014 appeal of the June 2, 2014 President Reagan Library FOIA denial decision of the plaintiff’s July 27, 2010 NARA MDR FOIA request. The plaintiff sought the release of the NARA “Perot”, the NARA “Peter Keisler Collection”, and the NARA “Robert v National Archives ‘Bulky Evidence File” documents by application of President Obama’s December 29, 2009 E.O. 13526, Classified National Security Information, 75 F.R. 707 (January 5, 2010), § 3.5 Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR). On June 2, 2014, President Reagan Library Archivist/FOIA Coordinator Shelly Williams rendered a Case #M-425 denial decision with an attached Worksheet: This is in further response to your request for your Mandatory Review request for release of information under the provisions of Section 3.5 of Executive Order 13526, to Reagan Presidential records pertaining to Ross Perot doc re report see email. These records were processed in accordance with the Presidential Records Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2207. Id. Emphasis added. The Worksheet attachment to the decision lists three sets of Keisler, Peter: Files with Doc ## 27191, 27192, and 27193 notations.
  • Pro-Life Law Professor Stunned by Priest's Refusal of Communion

    Pro-Life Law Professor Stunned by Priest's Refusal of Communion

    Pro-life law professor stunned by priest’s refusal of Communion WASHINGTON – For Pepperdine law professor Douglas Kmiec, a constitutional lawyer who often writes on religion in the public square, the situation had uncomfortable echoes of the last presidential election cycle – a priest was refusing to give Communion to someone on the basis of the man’s support of a candidate. This time, though, the surprised Massgoer turned away by a priest was Prof. Kmiec himself. The former dean of the law school at The Catholic University of America in Washington is an architect of the Reagan administration’s stance against abortion whose pro-life credentials include serving as keynote speaker at the March for Life’s annual Rose Dinner a few years ago. When the priest upbraided the law professor from the pulpit for his endorsement of presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and then refused to give him Communion, Prof. Kmiec was stunned, he told Catholic News Service June 4 in a telephone interview. (Since 2002 Prof. Kmiec has been a columnist for CNS.) The incident occurred at a Mass preceding the meeting of a Catholic business group in California at which Prof. Kmiec was the featured speaker. Sen. Obama, now the presumptive Democratic nominee for president, has voted to support legal abortion and opposed legislation that would restrict abortion. In endorsing him, Prof. Kmiec has explained that he was drawn to Sen. Obama’s “remarkable ‘love thy neighbor’ style of campaigning, his express aim to transcend partisan divide, and specifically, his appreciation for faith.” At the event, Prof.
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia

    United States District Court for the District of Columbia

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CARA LESLIE ALEXANDER, ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 96-2123 ) 97-1288 ) (RCL) FEDERAL BUREAU OF ) INVESTIGATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the court on Plaintiffs’ Motion [827] to Compel Answers to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories to the Executive Office of the President Pursuant to Court Order of April 13, 1998. Upon consideration of this motion, and the opposition and reply thereto, the court will GRANT the plaintiffs’ motion. I. Background The underlying allegations in this case arise from what has become popularly known as “Filegate.” Plaintiffs allege that their privacy interests were violated when the FBI improperly handed over to the White House hundreds of FBI files of former political appointees and government employees from the Reagan and Bush Administrations. This particular dispute revolves around interrogatories pertaining to Mike McCurry, Ann Lewis, Rahm Emanuel, Sidney Blumenthal and Bruce Lindsey. Plaintiffs served these interrogatories pertaining to these five current or former officials on May 13, 1999. The EOP responded on July 16, 1999. Plaintiffs now seek to compel further answers to the following lines of questioning: 1. Any and all knowledge these officials have, including any meetings held or other communications made, about the obtaining of the FBI files of former White House Travel Office employees Billy Ray Dale, John Dreylinger, Barney Brasseux, Ralph Maughan, Robert Van Eimerren, and John McSweeney (Interrogatories 11, 35, 40 and 47). 2. Any and all knowledge these officials have, including any meetings held or other communications made, about the release or use of any documents between Kathleen Willey and President Clinton or his aides, or documents relating to telephone calls or visits 2 between Willey and the President or his aides (Interrogatories 15, 37, and 42).
  • Educating Artists

    Educating Artists

    DUKE LAW MAGAZINE MAGAZINE LAW DUKE Fall 2006 | Volume 24 Number 2 F all 2006 Educating Artists V olume 24 Number 2 Also: Duke Faculty on the Hill From the Dean Dear Alumni and Friends, University’s Algernon Sydney Sullivan Medal, awarded annually for outstanding commitment to service. This summer, four Duke law faculty members were Graduates Candace Carroll ’74 and Len Simon ’73 called to testify before Congressional committees. have used their talents and resources in support Professor Neil Vidmar appeared before the Senate of civil liberties, women’s rights, and public inter- Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, est causes; their recent leadership gift to Duke’s to address legislation on medical malpractice suits. Financial Aid Initiative helps Duke continue to attract Professor Madeline Morris testified before the Senate the best students, regardless of their ability to pay, Foreign Relations Committee regarding ratification of and gives them greater flexibility to pursue public the U.S.–U.K. extradition treaty. Professor James Cox interest careers. Other alumni profiled in this issue offered his views on proposed reforms for the conduct who are using their Duke Law education to make a of securities class action litigation to the House difference include Judge Curtis Collier ’74, Chris Kay Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee ’78, Michael Dockterman ’78, Andrea Nelson Meigs on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government ’94, and Judge Gerald Tjoflat ’57. Sponsored Enterprises. Professor Scott Silliman, I want to thank all alumni, friends, and faculty executive director of the Center on Law, Ethics and who contributed so generously to the Law School in National Security, was on Capitol Hill three times in the past year.
  • From John F. Kennedy's 1960 Campaign Speech to Christian

    From John F. Kennedy's 1960 Campaign Speech to Christian

    NYLS Law Review Vols. 22-63 (1976-2019) Volume 53 Issue 4 Faculty Presentation Day Article 1 January 2008 From John F. Kennedy’s 1960 Campaign Speech to Christian Supremacy: Religion in Modern Presidential Politics Stephen A. Newman New York Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/nyls_law_review Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legal History Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Stephen A. Newman, From John F. Kennedy’s 1960 Campaign Speech to Christian Supremacy: Religion in Modern Presidential Politics, 53 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 691 (2008-2009). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. VOLUME 53 | 2008/09 STEPHEN A. NEWMAN From John F. Kennedy’s 1960 Campaign Speech to Christian Supremacy: Religion in Modern Presidential Politics ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Stephen A. Newman is a professor of law at New York Law School. The author would like to thank Joseph Molinari of the New York Law School library for his invaluable assistance in the preparation of this article. 691 At a time when we see around the world the violent consequences of the assumption of religious authority by government, Americans may count themselves fortunate: Our regard for constitutional boundaries has protected us from similar travails, while allowing private religious exercise to flourish. The well-known statement that “[w]e are a religious people,” has proved true.