The Criminalization of Private Debt a Pound of Flesh the Criminalization of Private Debt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Criminalization of Private Debt a Pound of Flesh the Criminalization of Private Debt A Pound of Flesh The Criminalization of Private Debt A Pound of Flesh The Criminalization of Private Debt © 2018 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 4 How the Court System Is Used to Send Debtors to Jail .................................................................... 5 The Role of Civil Court Judges ............................................................................................................. 6 Prosecutors and Debt Collectors as Business Partners ................................................................... 7 A System That Breeds Coercion and Abuse ....................................................................................... 7 Key Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 7 A Nation of Debtors on the Financial Edge .............................................................................................. 9 The Debt-to-Jail Pipeline ............................................................................................................................12 State and Federal Laws That Allow the Jailing of Debtors .............................................................14 When Judges Reflexively Issue Arrest Warrants for Debtors .......................................................15 How Courts Use the Threat of Jail to Extract Payment ...................................................................16 Abuse of Contempt and the Unlawful Return to Debtors’ Prisons ................................................18 For Debtors, the Trauma of Arrest and Jail ............................................................................................19 No Notice, No Evidence, No Attorney ......................................................................................................21 Violations of Right to Counsel When Liberty Is at Stake ............................................................... 23 Partnerships Between Prosecutors and Check Collection Companies .............................................. 26 How Prosecutors Profit From Contracts With Check Collection Companies ............................. 29 Abusive Practices in a Poorly Regulated Industry ................................................................................ 32 Violations of Federal and State Consumer Protection Laws ......................................................... 35 Breaches of Fundamental Human Rights .............................................................................................. 38 Recommendations .....................................................................................................................................40 Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................................... 44 Appendix I: Case Studies .......................................................................................................................... 45 Case Studies: Arrest Warrants and Jailing in Debt Collection Cases .......................................... 45 Medical Debts ............................................................................................................................... 45 Student Loans and Other Education Debts ............................................................................. 46 Housing Debts .............................................................................................................................. 48 Household Debts ..........................................................................................................................50 Credit Card and Other Consumer Debts .................................................................................. 52 Auto Debts .................................................................................................................................... 54 Payday and Other High-Interest Loans .................................................................................... 55 Case Studies: Abuses by Check Collection Companies in Partnerships With Prosecutors .....56 Appendix II: Federal and State Laws Authorizing the Arrest and Jailing of Debtors .................... 60 Appendix III: Documents ..........................................................................................................................66 Endnotes .....................................................................................................................................................80 Executive Summary An estimated 77 million Americans—one in three adults—have a debt that has been turned over to a private collection agency. Thousands of these debtors are arrested and jailed each year because they owe money. Millions more are threatened with jail. The debts owed can be as small as a few dollars 1 in 3 and can involve every kind of consumer debt, from Americans has a debt car payments to utility bills to student loans to medical fees.1 These trends devastate communities that has been turned across the country as unmanageable debt and over to a private household financial crisis become ubiquitous, and they impact Black and Latino communities most collection agency. harshly due to longstanding racial and ethnic gaps in poverty and wealth. 1,000 cases in which civil court judges issued arrest Debtors’ prisons were abolished by Congress in warrants for debtors, sometimes to collect amounts 1833 and are thought to be a relic of the Dickensian as small as $28. These cases took place in 26 states— past. In reality, private debt collectors—empowered Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, by the courts and prosecutors’ offices—are using Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, the criminal justice system to punish debtors and Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, terrorize them into paying even when a debt is in Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, dispute or when a debtor has no ability to pay. Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, The criminalization of private debt happens when and Wisconsin—and Puerto Rico and the Northern judges, at the request of collection agencies, issue Mariana Islands. arrest warrants for people who failed to appear in Even without arrest warrants, the mere threat of court to deal with unpaid civil debt judgments. In jail can be effective in extracting payment—even many cases, the debtors were unaware they were if that threat is legally unfounded. In the case of sued or had not received notice to show up in court. debts involving bounced checks, private collection Tens of thousands of these warrants are issued companies now have contracts with more than 200 annually, but the total number is unknown because district attorneys’ offices that allow them to use states and local courts do not typically track these the prosecutor’s seal and signature on repayment orders as a category of arrest warrants. In a review demand letters. It’s estimated that more than 1 of court records, the ACLU examined more than million consumers each year receive such letters 4 American Civil Liberties Union threatening criminal prosecution and jail time if they CASE STUDY do not pay up. But review of company practices has documented that letters often falsely misrepresent Arrested for a student loan the threat of prosecution as a means of coercing debt payments from unknowing consumers. In September 2015, Gordon Wheeler was arrested by seven or eight U.S. Marshals at his Texas home for failure to appear at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District How the Court System Is Used to of Texas. Wheeler was unable to show up in Send Debtors to Jail court because he had just had open-heart surgery. “You just coming over here serving When Americans fail to repay financial obligations, me papers saying I got to show up and I just creditors usually hire debt collectors to go after the told you I had open-heart surgery two or debtors or sell the debts to companies that specialize three weeks ago…so I’m not a well man,” he in collections. More than 6,000 debt collection firms said. The original $2,500 federal student loan he obtained to pay for trucking school operate in the United States, collecting billions of in 1983 had mushroomed into $12,000 with 2 dollars each year. interest and fees. Wheeler is retired and subsists on Social Security and disability, These collectors flood small-claims and other state and says he cannot pay it, noting, “You can’t courts with lawsuits seeking repayment. Millions squeeze blood out of a turnip.”5 of collection lawsuits are filed each year in state and local courts that have effectively become collectors’ courts. The majority of cases on many state court also ask courts to require defendants to be in court dockets are debt collection suits,3 and in many state for post-judgment proceedings. At these proceedings, courts, debt purchasers file more suits than any other often called “judgment debtor examinations,” type of plaintiff. defendants are required to answer questions about Debt collection lawyers can file hundreds of suits a their wages, bank account balances, property, and day, often with little evidence that the alleged debt assets. Debt collectors use these responses to take is actually owed.4 Once a lawsuit is filed, the process other steps to collect
Recommended publications
  • DC Wage Garnishment
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE 2001 EDITION DIVISION II. JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE TITLE 16. PARTICULAR ACTIONS, PROCEEDINGS AND MATTERS. CHAPTER 5. ATTACHMENT AND GARNISHMENT. SUBCHAPTER III. ATTACHMENT AND GARNISHMENT OF WAGES, ETC. § 16-571. Definitions. For purposes of this subchapter – (1) The term “wages” means compensation paid or payable for personal services whether denominated as wages, salary, commission, bonus, or otherwise, and includes periodic payments pursuant to a pension or retirement program. (2) The term “disposable wages” means that part of the earnings of any individual remain- ing after the deduction from those earnings of any amounts required by law to be withheld. (3) The term “garnishment” means any legal or equitable procedure through which the wages of any individual are required to be withheld for payment of any debt. § 16-572. Attachment of wages; percentage limitations; priority of attachments. Notwithstanding any other provision of subchapter II of this chapter, where an attachment is levied upon wages due a judgment debtor from an employer-garnishee, the attachment shall become a lien and a continuing levy upon the gross wages due or to become due to the judgment debtor for the amount specified in the attachment to the extent of: (1) 25 per centum of his disposable wages that week, or (2) the amount by which his disposable wages for that week exceed thirty times the federal minimum hourly wage prescribed by section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206) in effect at the time the wages are payable, whichever is less.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Terminology
    Legal Terminology A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A ABATES – CAUSE: Used in Criminal Division cases when the defendant has died, so the “cause” (the case) “abates” (is terminated). ACQUITTED: Defendant is found not guilty ADJUDICATION HEARING: In child abuse and neglect proceedings, the trial stage at which the court hears the state’s allegations and evidence and decides whether the state has the right to intervene on behalf of the child. In a juvenile delinquency case, a hearing in which the court hears evidence of the charges and makes a finding of whether the charges are true or not true. ADMINISTRATOR: Person appointed to oversee the handling of an estate when there is no will. ADMONISHED: A reprimand or cautionary statement addressed to an attorney or party in the case by a judge. AFFIANT: One who makes an affidavit. AFFIDAVIT: A written statement made under oath. AGE OF MAJORITY: The age when a person acquires all the rights and responsibilities of being an adult. In most states, the age is 18. ALIAS: Issued after the first instrument has not been effective or resulted in action. ALIAS SUMMONS: A second summons issued after the original summons has failed for some reason. ALIMONY: Also called maintenance or spousal support. In a divorce or separation, the money paid by one spouse to the other in order to fulfill the financial obligation that comes with marriage. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: Methods for resolving problems without going to court.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Credit Counseling
    CENTRAL VIRGINIA LEGAL AID SOCIETY, INC. 1000 Preston Ave, Suite B 101 W Broad, Ste 101 2006 Wakefield Street Charlottesville, VA 22903 Richmond, VA 23241 Petersburg, VA 23805 434-296-8851 (Voice) 804-648-1012 (Voice) 804-862-1100 (Voice) 434-296-5731 (Fax) 804-649-8794 (Fax) 804-861-4311 (Fax) Consumer Credit Counseling You may have bills and debts you can’t pay. You are not alone. Many agencies try to help people get out of debt. These are called “credit counseling agencies” or “debt counseling agencies.” You should be very careful about consumer credit counseling. Many agencies do more harm than good. What services does a credit counseling agency offer? Credit counseling usually offers three services. • Budget counseling to help you pay your debts on your own. • A debt management plan, or debt repayment plan, run by the agency. • Referral to other agencies, such as social, financial and legal services. What is a debt management plan? In this plan, the agency arranges lower payments with your creditors. Usually these are your credit cards. Your payments are lower because your creditors agree on lower interest rates. When all the creditors who are in your plan agree, you make one monthly payment to the agency. The agency uses that money to make your lower payments to your creditors. When should I think about a debt management plan? You should think about a plan if two things are true. (1) You can’t pay all your bills and debts, and can’t keep current on all your accounts. (2) You have income or property you could lose to a creditor.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of Med Debt
    The Consequences of Medical Debt Evidence from Three Communities February 2003 Comité de Apoyo de Inquilinos y Trabajadores Tenants’ and Workers’ Support Committee The Access Project (TAP) is affiliated with the Heller School for Social Policy and Management at Brandeis University. It has served as a resource center for local communities working to improve health and healthcare access since 1998. The project receives its funding from a variety of public and private sources. The mission of TAP is to strengthen community action, promote social change, and improve health, especially for those who are most vulnerable. TAP conducts community action research in conjunction with local leaders to improve the quality of relevant information needed to change the health system. It seeks to enhance the knowledge and skills of community leaders to strengthen the voice of underserved communities in the public and private policy discussions that directly affect them. 30 Winter Street, Suite 930 Boston, MA 02108 Phone: (617) 654-9911 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.accessproject.org The Champaign County Health Care Consumers (CCHCC), founded in 1977, is a non-profit grassroots citizen action organization dedicated to the mission of health care for all. CCHCC is founded on the premise of participatory democracy and the belief that meaningful change in the health care system will come only with the active involvement of consumers. CCHCC works to bring a consumer voice and consumer-driven changes to the health care system through education, advocacy, and community organizing. CCHCC is a community-based organization with over 7,000 members working locally on issues of national importance.
    [Show full text]
  • A Crisis of Medical Debt Americans Owe About One Trillion Dollars in Medical Debt
    A Crisis of Medical Debt Americans owe about one trillion dollars in medical debt. That’s just over $3000 for every adult and child. Each year, 79,000,000 Americans are faced with difficult choices of paying their mounting medical bills or paying for basic human Quick Facts about Medical Debt: needs like shelter and food for themselves and their families. About 66% of U.S. bankruptcy cases are related to medical debt issues, and • 42.9 million Americans have about 25% of credit card debt is medical debt. Because it is so unpaid medical bills expensive, about 50% of Americans delay going to the doctor when • Six in 10 of both insured and sick. The cost of U.S. medical care, even with insurance, is crushing uninsured people say they working and middle class families across the country. have difficulty in paying other bills as a result of medical After a period of time, overdue medical debt is sold for pennies on debt. the dollar by medical clinics and hospitals to private collection agencies, who then try to collect the full balance from the original • Medical debt contributes to debt holder. More than half of the debt collections market in the more than 60 percent of the United States is related to medical debt. This is where RIP Medical bankruptcies in the U.S. Debt comes in. They buy up medical debt for pennies on the dollar, and then instead of collecting the original balance, they erase it. It is a practice of mercy, and we can participate. Data and some text for this info sheet and for RIP Medical Debt available here: https://ripmedicaldebt.org.
    [Show full text]
  • 36670 Federal Register / Vol
    36670 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 117 / Wednesday, June 17, 2020 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For been in 7 CFR part 792. In addition, information, contact Iris Roseboro; regulations in 7 CFR parts 1951 and Office of the Secretary telephone: (202) 720–6257; email: 1956 have been used by FSA in the [email protected]. Persons with settlement and adjustments of FSA farm 7 CFR Part 3 disabilities who require alternative loans made under the Consolidated means for communication should Farm and Rural Development Act Federal Crop Insurance Corporation contact the USDA Target Center at (202) (ConAct) and debts related to those 720–2600 (voice). loans. This rule removes 7 CFR part 792 7 CFR Part 400 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and 7 CFR part 1951, subpart C. Since 7 CFR part 1956 is also used by the Background Farm Service Agency Rural Development of USDA (RD), those The regulations in 7 CFR part 3 (part regulations are not deleted but are 7 CFR Parts 761, 765, 766, 772, and 792 3) specify the general regulations amended to state affirmatively that they applicable to debt collection activities of do not apply to loans made by FSA and Commodity Credit Corporation USDA agencies and specify the amount debts relating to such loans. In those of civil penalties that USDA agencies limited instances where provisions of 7 7 CFR Part 1403 levy as authorized by law. Federal CFR parts 792, 1951, and 1956 will agencies are required by several laws to continue to be used because of their Farm Service Agency collect debts owed to the United States, specific application to FSA debts, the principally DCIA.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Contempt Power
    Washington University Law Review Volume 1961 Issue 1 January 1961 The History of the Contempt Power Ronald Goldfarb New York University Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Recommended Citation Ronald Goldfarb, The History of the Contempt Power, 1961 WASH. U. L. Q. 1 (1961). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol1961/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW QUARTERLY Volume 1961 February, 1961 Number 1 THE HISTORY OF THE CONTEMPT POWER* Ronald Goldfarbi" INTRODUCTION Contempt can be generally defined as an act of disobedience or dis- respect toward a judicial or legislative body, or interference with its orderly process, for which a summary punishment is usually exacted. In a grander view, it is a power assumed by governmental bodies to coerce cooperation, and punish criticism or interference, even of a causally indirect nature. In legal literature, it has been categorized, subclassified, and scholastically dignified by division into varying shades--each covering some particular aspect of the general power, respectively governed by a particular procedure. So, the texts separate retributive or criminal coritempts from merely coercive or civil con- tempts--those directly offensive from those only constructively con- temptuous-those affecting the judiciary and others the legislature. The implementation of this power has taken place predominantly in England and America, and has recently been accelerated into a con- tinuingly greater role in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • CH 12 Contempt of Court
    CONTEMPT OF COURT .............................................................................. 1 §12-1 General Rules .............................................................................................. 1 §12-2 Direct Contempt and Indirect Contempt ............................................. 4 §12-3 Conduct of Counsel and Pro Se Litigant .............................................. 9 §12-4 Violating Court Orders ........................................................................... 14 §12-5 Other Conduct .......................................................................................... 17 §12-6 Sentencing ................................................................................................. 19 i CONTEMPT OF COURT §12-1 General Rules United States Supreme Court Codispoti v. Pennsylvania, 418 U.S. 506, 94 S.Ct. 2687, 41 L.Ed.2d 912 (1974) An alleged contemnor may be summarily tried for acts of contempt that occur during a trial, and may receive a sentence of no more than six months. In addition, the judge may summarily convict and punish for separate contemptuous acts that occur during trial even though the aggregate punishment exceeds six months. However, when a judge postpones until after trial contempt proceedings for various acts of contempt committed during trial, the contemnor is entitled to a jury trial if the aggregate sentence is more than six months, even though each individual act of contempt is punished by a term of less than six months. Gelbard v. U.S., 408 U.S. 41, 92 S.Ct. 2357, 33 L.Ed.2d 179 (1972) In defense to a contempt charge brought on the basis of a grand jury witness's refusal to obey government orders to testify before the grand jury, witness may invoke federal statute barring use of intercepted wire communications as evidence. Groppe v. Leslie, 404 U.S. 496, 92 S.Ct. 582, 30 L.Ed.2d 632 (1972) Due process was violated where, without notice or opportunity to be heard, state legislature passed resolution citing person for contempt that occurred two days earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Contempt of Court Procedure: a Protection to the Rights of the Individual
    VOL . XXX MARCH 1951 NO . 3 Criminal Contempt of Court Procedure: A Protection to the Rights of the Individual J. C. MCRUERt Toronto What I have to say may be prefaced by two quotations, the first from Chambers Encyclopaedia : There is probably no country in which Courts of Law are not furnished with the means of vindicating their authority and preserving their dignity by calling in the aid of the Executive in certain circumstances without the formalities usually attending a trial and sentence. Of .this the simplest instance is where the Judge orders the officers to enforce silence or to clear the court. and the second from Bacon's Abridgment: Every court of -record, as incident to it, may enjoin the people to keep silence, under a pain, and impose reasonable fines, not only *on such as shall be convicted before them of any crime on a formal prosecution, but also on all such as shall be guilty of any contempt in the face of the court, as by giving opprobrious language to the judge, or obstinately refusing to do their duty as officers of the Court and may immediately order them into custody.' . To. these I add two other quotations: A Court of Justice without power to vindicate its own dignity, to enforce obedience to its mandates, to protect its officers, or to shield those who are * Based on an address delivered to the Lawyers Club, Toronto, on January 24th, 1952 . t The Hon . J. C. McRuer, Chief. Justice, High Court of Justice, Ontario . ' (7th ed.) Vol . 2, p.
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNMENT of the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA Office of the Attorney General
    GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Office of the Attorney General ATTORNEY GENERAL KARL A. RACINE April 24, 2020 GUIDANCE ON THE DEBT COLLECTION PROVISIONS OF THE COVID-19 RESPONSE SUPPLEMENTAL EMERGENCY AMENDMENT ACT OF 2020 On April 10, 2020, the Council for the District of Columbia passed the emergency Act 23-286, the COVID-19 Response Supplemental Emergency Amendment Act of 2020 (“Emergency Act”) which aims to help DC residents deal with the fallout from the coronavirus pandemic. Section 207 of the Emergency Act amended D.C. Code § 28-3814 to add a number of temporary restrictions related to the collection of consumer debt during the coronavirus pandemic. The District of Columbia Office of the Attorney General (“OAG”) enforces the prohibitions in D.C. Code § 28-3814 though its enforcement authority under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act, D.C. Code § 28-3909. OAG issues the following guidance on how it interprets the Emergency Act for enforcement purposes to provide clarity regarding the law’s debt collection provisions. The Emergency Act covers any debt that is 30 days past due and was made for the purchase of goods, services, or property for personal, family or household purposes. This includes motor vehicle loans but does not include home mortgages or other loans on real property.1 For the duration of the declared coronavirus emergency, and for 60 days after its conclusion, the Emergency Act prohibits creditors and debt collectors from threatening or initiating any new legal action to collect a debt, visiting a debtor’s home or place of employment, or confronting the debtor about the debt in any public place.
    [Show full text]
  • Past-Due Medical Debt Among Nonelderly Adults, 2012–15
    HEALTH POLICY CENTER AND OPPORTUNITY AND OWNERSHIP INITIATIVE Past-Due Medical Debt among Nonelderly Adults, 2012–15 Michael Karpman and Kyle J. Caswell March 2017 Medical bills contribute to financial insecurity for many Americans. In this brief, we use survey data to examine the prevalence of past-due medical debt among nonelderly adults—specifically, how it varies across states, and how it has changed over time. We find that states differ substantially in the share of nonelderly adults reporting that they have unpaid medical bills that are past due. Many Americans carry past-due medical debt balances. A recent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau report found that unpaid debt in collections owed to hospitals and other medical providers made up about half of all debt in collections, and that 19 percent of consumers with a credit file had some form of medical debt in collections (CFPB 2014). Families with medical debt report that it reduces their ability to save and to afford basic household needs, increases their reliance on credit cards and other forms of debt, damages their credit, and induces them to forgo needed health care (Hamel et al. 2016; Pollitz et al. 2014). In extreme cases, medical debt may contribute to personal bankruptcy, although the extent to which medical bills cause bankruptcy is debated (Dobkin et al. 2016; Dranove and Millenson 2006; Gross and Notowidigdo 2011; Himmelstein et al. 2005). A fundamental function of health insurance is to protect people against the risk of unexpected medical bills, and several studies have found that health insurance reduces medical debt as well as other forms of debt.
    [Show full text]
  • SOLVING the MEDICAL DEBT CRISIS Brianna Wells | March 2021 TABLE of CONTENTS
    SOLVING THE MEDICAL DEBT CRISIS Brianna Wells | March 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Medical Debt and Racial Health & Economic Disparities 5 Findings: Causes of Medical Debt 8 - Surprise Medical Billing - Medical Credit Cards - Third-Party Debt Collection - Uninsurance and Underinsurance - Credit Inequities Health Care Costs Due to COVID-19 and Medical Debt 11 Policy Recommendations 12 - Institutionalize Equity into Health Systems - Institutionalize Equity into Financial Institutions - State Government Policies Conclusion 15 Acknowledgements 16 References 18 The Greenlining Institute Solving the Medical Debt Crisis 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Medical debt is the number one cause of • In California, 31% of people of color have bankruptcy in the United States, with 62% of some type of past-due debt in collections, bankruptcies caused by medical bills.1 In 2016, compared to only 19% of White residents. one in six Americans had past due medical bills, • Twelve percent of people from communities of resulting in $81 billion in debt.2 color in California owe medical debt.6 In a 2015 survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation, The COVID-19 pandemic threatens to worsen 26% of Americans aged 18 to 64—52 million— health disparities and the burden of medical debt said that they struggled to pay medical bills.3 on communities of color. Health care costs due Medical expenses were the largest factor to COVID-19 have already left people in severe increasing the number of people in poverty last debt, and layoffs due to COVID leave historical year.4 numbers of people unemployed and uninsured.7 Communities of color have been especially Medical debt is not distributed equally across devastated by the pandemic, leaving them communities: especially vulnerable.
    [Show full text]