4 4 3 2 1* :
. 1 2.
3.
4.
E-mail: [email protected] : *
- : . . .
: . 307 1390 . 100 . 1391 spss . 16 . 4/69 6/2 28/22 : 04/172 17/175
.
7 12 . 91 /4/6 : : 25/6/91 25/6/91 : : 28/6/91 : .
/ . . :
/
91 / /
100
1 1
48 24 ( 10 )5 )10 .( .( )10 - .( 2 )1 ) ( . 2 )11.( )11.( - 9/1 - 60 )3 6.( 6.( )3 50 )12.( )12.( ( Prochaska )
( Diclemente ) .( )7 - )13.( )13.(
. . (8) - ) : - ( )14 )14
( ( ) / 15(. ( ( ) )
( ( Stage of behavior Change ) :1 / )9.( ( ( 3 3 ( Balance .Decisional ) 2
1 Self Efficacy 9 . . 4 ( ) / -
/ . ( ) 10
100
2 2
. .( 17 )16 . » . « . . 15 - 2 :1 - )18 3 3 20.( –
) . ( ( )74/0 ( )54/0 23( )21 25 . . . »
/ . «
/
. 1390 . 91 / ( )
/ . »
320 307 100
94 213
3
- . . « » 4/69 4/69 ) 213 - « . ( )6/30 94 ( . . 190 190 156 . 35 17 4 5 105 45 2 3 . 33 18 . 1 )2/77 )2/77 238 - 25 5 . ( )8/22 69 ( )9/65 )9/65 .( .( . . 1380 1389 ( )12
. 75 75 116 116 .
- 87/19 11/38 ) . 02/42 . . (
. 1 / 16 16 SPSS
/ 1 9 / /
100
4 4
. 1
2/77 2/77 237 17 _24 5/22 5/22 69 29 25 3/0 3/0 1 30 _35
4/69 4/69 213 6/30 6/30 94
0/9 0/9 28 6/68 6/68 211 7/18 7/18 57 7/3 7/3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 2/77 2/77 238 8/22 8/22 69
6 /25 /25 6 79 9/65 9/65 202 5/8 5/8 26
8/37 8/37 116 8/37 8/37 116 4/24 4/24 75
19 /87 61 11/38 11/38 117 02/42 02/42 129 100 100 00/ 307
( ) 2. 16 3 163 42/ 170 25/ 213 / 190 58/ 186 33/ 94 18 2 182 44/ 183 77/ 238
126 60/ 145 51/ 69 / 17 2 172 04/ 175 17/ 307
91 / /
100
5
720 - 49/35 175 17/ 92/78 . . 92/78 172 04/ ( 190 58/ 186 )33/ ( 163 42/ 170 )25/ . ( p< 05/0)؛ 183 )77/ . 145 145 )51/ 182( 44/ - 2/75 2 .( .( 2 ) ( 126 60/ 30 .
3 100 100 8/65 5/19 2/8 2/5 1/3 100 100 5/35 5/36 9/18 8/6 3/2
100 100 4/11 1/29 3/36 3/17 9/5 100 100 7/53 6/17 6/16 10 2/1 100 100 47 30 15 2/6 6/1
100 100 29 1/39 2/18 8/8 9/4 100 100 3/17 2/19 6/32 5/19 .4/11 100 100 6/17 4/25 6/31 9/17 5/17
100 100 1/23 8/36 27 8/9 3/3 / 100 100 1/24 8/35 27 5/8 6/4
- 4 / P
0. 0. <001 32/3 83/11 1 9 / 003/0 003/0 23/2 18/7 / . 8/2 09/10 0/4 51/17 100
6 6
20 3 80 )8 .( )8 . 50 50 . .( )24 70 - . 3 . .( )25 . 32 )26.( )26.( -
. . . 4 . 27.( )24 7 / 12 . .
/ )25.(
91 / - .
/ )21.(
50 )28.( )28.( 100
.( )12
7
: . ( )28 - - . 12 - . . . . . )21.( -
.( )28 )25(
. - - )29 .( .( )29 . .
/ -
/
1
. 9 /
. .
/ .
100
8 8
1. Hayman, L.L., Williams, C.L., Daniels, S.R., Steinberger, J., Paridon, S., Dennison, B.A., et al. Cardiovascular health promotion in the schools: A statement for health and education professionals and child health advocates from the Committee on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth (AHOY) of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, American Heart Association. Circulation, 2004;110(15), 2266–2275. 2. Pate, R.R., Pratt, M., Blair, S.N., Haskell,W.L., Macera, C.A., Bouchard, C., et al. (). Physical activity and public health: A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. Journal of American Medical Association, 1995: 273(5), 402–407.
3. Bull FC, Armstrong TP, Dixon T, Ham S, Neiman A, Pratt M. Physical Inactivity. In: World Health Organization, ed. Comparative quantification of health risks. Global and regional burden of disease attributable to selected major risk factors. Volume 1. Geneva, Switzerland: 2004; p.729-881. 4. Bauman AE. Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000-2003. J . Sci Med Sport 2004; 7(Suppl 1):6-19. 5. World Health Organization. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004. . 6. World Health Organization. Preventing chronic diseases: a vital investment.Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2005. - 7. WHO. Prevention and health promotion, physical activity, direct and direct health benefits. WHO; 2003.
8. Nikniaz A. Healthy Environment supporter the health and constant expansion. 1st ed. Tabriz, soutodeh Co, 2003.P.19-23.
9. Brugman T, Ferguson S. Physical exercise and Improvement in Mental health J Psycho Nurs; 2002.40(8):24-31.
10. French M, McMuray A. Community Health and . Wellness a Sociology Approach, 2nd ed. Mosby, Sydney; 2006.139-140.
11. Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampar JB. Comparison of / Lifestyle and Structured Interventions to Increase Physical Activity and Cardio respiratory Fitness A Randomized Trial. JAMA; 2007.281(4):328-35.
12. Dwyer T, Johnston LD, Delva J. An investigation of the
/ effects of daily physical activity on the health of primary school students in south Australia. Int J Epidemiol 2006; 12:308-13. 91
/ 13. Velicer W, Prochaska J, Fava JL, Norman GJ,Redding CA. Smoking cessation and stress management:
applications of the transtheoretical model of behavior change. Homeostasis 1998; 38: 216-233. .
/ 14. Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Fava JL. Cancer prevention center, transtheoretical model. Available at: www.uri.edu/research/cprc/transtheoretical.htm, 2007. .
100
9
15. Coulson NS, Buchanan HB. Student attendance at dental 28. Sanaee Nasab H., Delavari A., Tavakkoli R., Samadi M., checkups: An application of the Trantheoretical Model. Naghizade M. M., Knowledge, attitude and practice Health Education Journal. 2002; 61(4):309-314. towards physical activity by one of Iran Medical Sciences Universities personnel, 2009; 11(1 ) 25-30. 16. Lewis BA, Marcus BH, Pate RR, Dunn Al. Psychosocial mediators of physical activity behavior among adults and 29. - Rose C. Browson, , Divita C, Rauscher E, Klein-Platat children. Am J Prev Med 2002; 23(2 suppl):26-35. C, Arveiler D. Intervention centered on adolescents' physical activity and sedentary behavior (ICAPS): 17. Motl RW, Dishman RK, Dowda M, Pate RR. Factorial Concept and 6 month results. Int J Obes Relat Metab validity and invariance of a self-report measure of Disord 2004; 28(Suppl3): 96-103. physical activity among adolescent girls. Res Q Exerc Sport 2004; 75(3):259-71.
18. Wilson DK, Friend R, Teasley N, Green S, Reaves IL, Sica DA. Motivational versus social cognitive interventions for promoting fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity in African American adolescents. Ann Behav Med 2002; 24(4): 310-19.
19. Hallal PC, Azevedo MR, Reichert FF, Siqueira FV, Araujo CL, Victora CG. Who, when, and how much? Epidemiology of walking in middle-income country. Am J Prev Med 2005; 28(2):156-61.
20. Motl RW, Dishman RK, Ward DS, Saunders RP, Dowda M, Felton G, et al. Comparison of barriers self-efficacy and perceived behavioral control for explaining physical activity across 1 year among adolescent girls. Health Psychol 2005; 24(1): 106-11.
21. Pirasteh A, Hidarnia A, Asghari A, Faghihzadeh S and Ghofranipour F. Development and validation of psychosocial determinants measures of physical activity
among Iranian adolescent girls BMC Public Health; 2008,8; 150.
22. Pirasteh A, Haidarnia A. Factor Analysis Psychosocial Determinants Measures of Physical Activity among Iranian Adolescent Girls. Journal of Medical council of Islamic Republic of Iran; 2009; 26(4): 474-85.
23. Pirasteh A, Haidarnia A, Faghihzadeh S. Evaluation of standards measuring psychosocial factors effective on
physical activities of high- school girl- students at Tehran branch No : 10. Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Vol. 15, No: 4, 2008; 39-47.
24. Baradaran – Rezaei M, Shirvani M, Fathi – Azar S. Comparative study of the Physical Activity among Students of Medical and non- medical Universities of Tabriz. Iran Journal of Nursing (IJN), 2008, 21 (55); 77-
87 . / 25. Salehi L, Taghdisi MH, Ghasemi H, Shokravesh B. Factors of facility and detained elders physical activity in Tehran; Iranian Journal of Epidemiology, 2010; 6(2): 7-
15. / 26. Taymoori, P.1; Niknami, Sh. 2; Ghofranipour, F.Cognitive and Psychosocial Factors of Physical
Activities amongAdolescents in Sanandaj by Frame Work 1 9
of Pender’s HealthPromotion and Stage of Change / Models (2006). journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Vol. 35, No: 4, 2008; 393-406.
27. Wallace S, Buckworth J, Kirby T2. Sherman WM. / Characteristics of exercise behavior among college students application of social cognitive theory to predicating stage of change. Prev Med 2000; 31(6):494- 100
505.
10 10
Predicting physical activity behavior among Daneshvar Iranian medical college students using the transtheoretical model Medicine Ashraf Pirasteh*1, Ali Davati 2, Zahra Jouhari 3, Laleh Mohamadi 4
1. Assistant Professor, Department of Health and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Health and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran. 3. Instructor, MSc of Environmental Health, Department of Health and social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran. 4. General Physician, Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
Background and Objective: Nowadays, the importance of physical activity as a health promoting behavior has been well documented. The purpose of this study was prediction of transtheorical model (TTM)’s constructs on regular physical activity among medical students.
Materials and Methods: This study was a descriptive-analytic research that carried out on 307 medical students at Shahed University using census method in 2011. The instruments of data collection were demographic and standard scale of seven-day physical activity recall (PAR), and benefits scale & barriers scale. The TTM guided instrument development. Collected data was analyzed using SPSS version 16.
Results: The findings of descriptive statistics showed that mean age of
students was 22.28 years (SD = 2.6) and 69.4% of participants were women. Mean of weekly physical activity in all of the students was 100 Scientific-Research 175.17 minutes, SD: 172.04, but in men a little more than women. The Journal of Shahed /NO. finding of analytic statistics showed that regression analysis predict that if University 1 score increase to total scores of benefits caused 7 scores in addition to
2012 Seventeenth Year, total scores of physical activity and 1 score increase to total scores of No.100 August, September barriers caused 12 scores decrease to total scores of physical activity. year/
th 2012 9 Conclusion: Those findings and using TTM constructs will help / / 1 practitioners for intervention and to improve the physical activity among university students.
Key words: Benefits, Barriers, Physical activity, Transtheorical model, Medical students
shahed University Received: 26/6/2012 Last revised: 15/9/2012 Accepted: 18/9/2012
Daneshvar(medicine)
1 11/