Rivieras Area Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rivieras Area Plan Rivieras Area Plan Prepared by the Lake County Community Development Department With the assistance of the Rivieras Area Planning Advisory Committee Adopted January 9, 2007 Rivieras Area Plan RIVIERAS AREA PLAN Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 The Planning Process 2-1 The Function of an Area Plan Purpose Focus Organization Methodology 2-5 Plan Preparation Citizen Participation Process Relationship to Other Plans 2-6 2.2 Orientation to the Rivieras Area 2-8 Climate County Geography Planning Area Geography 2.3 History and Development 2-9 Present Future 3.0 NATURAL RESOURCES 3.1 Land 3-1 Planning Area Geology and Soils 3-1 3.2 Water 3-3 Ground Water 3-4 Surface Water 3-5 Clear Lake Thurston Creek and Thurston Lake Water-Induced Erosion 3-7 Water Reclamation 3-8 3.3 Vegetation and Wildlife 3-11 Vegetation 3-11 Oak Woodlands 3-11 Mount Konocti 3-13 Thurston Creek 3-14 Black Forest 3-14 Riparian Vegetation 3-15 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Plants 3-17 Rivieras Area Plan Wildlife 3-22 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species 3-22 3.4 Resources 3-26 Development Agriculture 3-26 Buffer Zones 3-29 Mineral and Aggregate Resources 3-31 Geothermal Resources 3-33 Conservation Cultural and Historical Resources 3-34 Scenic Views 3-36 4.0 PUBLIC SAFETY 4-1 4.1 Land 4-1 Slope Instability 4-1 Expansive Soils 4-3 Liquefaction 4-5 Volcanism 4-5 Seismic Activity 4-5 4.2 Water 4-7 4.3 Wildfire 4-10 4.4 Air Quality 4-14 5.0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5-1 5.1 Economy 5-1 5.2 Housing 5-4 Future Housing Needs 5-6 5.3 Networks 5-9 Streets and Highways 5-9 Future Growth 5-13 Transit 5-16 Bicycle and Pedestrian 5-17 Utilities 5-20 Water 5-20 Wastewater 5-22 Storm Drainage 5-24 Solid Waste 5-24 Communications and Energy Systems 5-24 Telephone, Television and Internet 5-24 Power 5-25 5.4 Services 5-25 Parks and Recreational Facilities 5-26 Schools 5-28 Public Safety 5-29 Rivieras Area Plan Fire 5-29 Law Enforcement 5-29 5.5 Land Use and Zoning Plans 5-30 Commercial 5-32 Golf Courses 5-32 Residential 5-37 Agriculture and Rural Areas 5-42 Open Space 5-42 Special Zoning Recommendations 5-43 6.0 COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6-1 List of Figures Figure 2-1 Rivieras Planning Area 2-2 Figure 2-2 Community Areas – Overview 2-3 Figure 2-3 Planning Area Population Characteristics 2-11 Figure 2-4 Population and Housing Unit Projections 2-12 Figure 3-1 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Plants Potentially Occurring within the Planning Area 3-19 Figure 3-2 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Animals Potentially Occurring within the Planning Area 3-22 Figure 3-3 Important Farmland in the Planning Area 3-28 Figure 3-4 Geothermal Setback in the Planning Area 3-34 Figure 3-5 Scenic Routes 3-39 Figure 4-1 Slopes of the Rivieras Planning Area 4-2 Figure 4-2 Shrink-Swell Potential in the Planning Area 4-4 Figure 4-3 Flood and Earthquake Hazards in the Planning Area 4-9 Figure 4-4 Fire District Boundaries 4-12 Figure 5-1 Functional Road Classification 5-9 Figure 5- 2 Traffic Volumes on State Highways 5-10 Figure 5-3 Traffic Volumes on County Roads 5-11 Figure 5-4 Acreage of Existing and Proposed General Plan Designations 5-31 Figure 5-5 Acreage of Existing and Proposed Zoning Designations 5-31 Figure 5-6 Buckingham Golf Course General Plan of Development 5-34 Figure 5-7 Riviera Hills Golf Course General Plan of Development 5-35 Figure 5-8 Soda Bay Community Area 5-40 Figure 5-9 Clear Lake Riviera Community Area 5-41 Rivieras Area Plan Acknowledgements Lake County Board of Supervisors Ed Robey Vice Chair, District I Jeff Smith Chair, District II Denise Rushing District III Anthony Farrington District IV Rob Brown District V Planning Commission Frieda Camotta District I Gary Briggs Chair, District II Marvin Butler District III Cliff Swetnam Vice Chair, District IV Gil Schoux District V Lake County Community Development Department Richard Coel Community Development Director Emily Minton Senior Planner/Project Coordinator With the Assistance of the Rivieras Area Planning Advisory Committee: Curtis Winchester, Chair Kit Larsen Ed Calkins, Vice Chairman Robert Morse Monte Black Russ Patterson Tony Braito Eric Seely Michael Fowler Angela Siegel Michael Friel Rob Suenram Graphic Credits: All graphics and maps produced by Lon Sharp, GIS Specialist. All other photos by Emily Minton, unless otherwise noted. Rivieras Area Plan 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Rivieras Area Plan is a guide for long-term growth and development in the planning area and is a complement to the Lake County General Plan. It is a planning tool that will facilitate refined planning decisions based on community values and priorities of the residents of the planning area. The relationship between the General Plan and an area plan must be mutually complementary and consistent. Policies in the area plan should supplement general plan policies, yet more precisely reflect the characteristics found in the planning area. The higher level of policy accountability for this plan ensures the residents of the future that the vision of the citizens in 2006 is carried out as adopted. County landowners and residents seek assurances that the use of a neighbor’s property will be compatible with the health, safety, welfare and preservation of property values, the economy and the County’s rural character. Therefore, facilitating land development and land use must balance a property owner’s right of reasonable use and the impact of that use on neighboring property owners. A long-range plan should provide adequate land use allocations to meet the community’s needs while also protecting vital natural resources. This plan includes two special study areas (Soda Bay and Clear Lake Riviera Community Areas). Land use designations have been amended where necessary to reduce potential land use impacts. Environmental concerns have been identified and policies developed to protect the unique natural features of the area. Several of the benefits of this plan are as follows: Plan policies and guidelines include fire protection measures. Plan policies and guidelines require utilization of buffer areas between incompatible uses. Plan policies and guidelines provide opportunities for the protection and use of existing resort and recreational opportunities along the shoreline of Clear Lake. This plan recognizes that agriculture is an important aspect of the rural character of the area. Properties in areas with safety and environmental constraints, including identified fault zones, landslide areas, steep slopes and areas of high erosion potential have been designated “RR”, Rural Residential or “RL”, Rural Lands to limit development to lower densities in these potentially hazardous areas. Future development will be directed away from areas of known environmental concern, including wetlands, through the use of low land use densities, and through conservation districts. Community areas have been developed within which additional development may be appropriate, dependent upon environmental constraints, health and safety concerns and the need for additional housing. The General Plan Update has identified these as community growth boundaries. Higher density residential development outside of these community growth boundaries is not appropriate due to existing infrastructure and safety constraints. Riparian corridors along existing creeks will be protected from the impacts of future development through the use of the “FF”, Floodway Fringe and “WW”, Waterway combining districts. Publicly owned parcels have been designated as Open Space. The “U”, Unclassified zoning district has been eliminated within the planning area. 1-1 Rivieras Area Plan To the extent possible, parcels containing land uses inconsistent with existing zoning districts have been rezoned to be consistent with the land use. The major recommendations within the two special study areas are: Soda Bay Commercial Area – Measures should be taken to enhance the economic viability of the area. Commercial development should be diversified in this area. Design guidelines are detailed in Section 6 of this plan. Clear Lake Riviera Commercial Area – Commercial development should be diversified in this area. The existing design guidelines established by the Clear Lake Riviera CC&R’s should be sustained. This area is designated for commercial development intended to support residents and tourists. No heavy commercial or industrial uses should be permitted. Mixed use development, with residences above the commercial uses should be considered. Guidelines are detailed in Section 6 of this plan. The recommendations in each of the basic land uses are as follows: Commercial – The Resort Commercial designation will be applied to existing resorts. All new commercial development should be subject to the Design Review Guidelines in the appendices of this plan. Planned Development Commercial is maintained for the marina in Buckingham, which accommodates boat storage and related watercraft services. Additional Service Commercial land use designations are provided adjacent to the existing self storage facility, along the south side of Highway 29, west of the intersection with Highway 281. Industrial – Industrial and manufacturing sites are not provided in this planning area due to the lack of a public sewer system and lack of appropriate sites. Residential – Future residential development should be directed to infill sites within the existing subdivisions. Additional lands within the community growth boundaries are designated for low density residential development of one dwelling unit per one to three gross acres, due to infrastructure restraints, including the lack of a public sewer system. These areas should be developed by clustering residential development and recreation areas should be included utilizing the planned development process.
Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 118/Monday, June 20, 2016/Notices
    39944 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 118 / Monday, June 20, 2016 / Notices information collection described in Type of Request: Extension. programs and projects that increase the Section A. Form Number: N/A. supply of affordable housing units, Description of the need for the prevent and reduce homelessness, A. Overview of Information Collection information and proposed use: improve data collection and reporting, Title of Information Collection: Application information is needed to and use coordinated neighborhood and OneCPD Technical Assistance Needs determine competition winners, i.e., the community development strategies to Assessment. technical assistance providers best able revitalize and strengthen their OMB Approval Number: 2506–0198. to develop efficient and effective communities. Number of Frequency of Responses Burden hour Annual burden Hourly cost Information collection respondents response per annum per response hours per response Annual cost Application .................... 52 1 52 100 5,200 $0 $0 Work Plans ................... 23 10 230 18 4,140 40 165,600 Reports ......................... 23 4 72 6 432 40 17,280 Recordkeeping ............. 23 12 276 6 1,656 40 66,240 Total ...................... ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 11,248 ........................ 249,120 B. Solicitation of Public Comment DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND or telephone (202) 708–2290. This is not URBAN DEVELOPMENT a toll-free number. Persons with hearing This notice is soliciting comments or speech impairments may access this [Docket No. FR–5910–N–10] from members of the public and affected number through TTY by calling the toll- parties concerning the collection of 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877– information described in Section A on Collection: Veterans Home 8339.
    [Show full text]
  • Springs of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIBECTOB WATER- SUPPLY PAPER 338 SPRINGS OF CALIFORNIA BY GEKALD A. WARING WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 CONTENTS. Page. lntroduction by W. C. Mendenhall ... .. ................................... 5 Physical features of California ...... ....... .. .. ... .. ....... .............. 7 Natural divisions ................... ... .. ........................... 7 Coast Ranges ..................................... ....•.......... _._._ 7 11 ~~:~~::!:: :~~e:_-_-_·.-.·.·: ~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::: ::: 12 Sierra Nevada .................... .................................... 12 Southeastern desert ......................... ............. .. ..... ... 13 Faults ..... ....... ... ................ ·.. : ..... ................ ..... 14 Natural waters ................................ _.......................... 15 Use of terms "mineral water" and ''pure water" ............... : .·...... 15 ,,uneral analysis of water ................................ .. ... ........ 15 Source and amount of substances in water ................. ............. 17 Degree of concentration of natural waters ........................ ..· .... 21 Properties of mineral waters . ................... ...... _. _.. .. _... _....• 22 Temperature of natural waters ... : ....................... _.. _..... .... : . 24 Classification of mineral waters ............ .......... .. .. _. .. _......... _ 25 Therapeutic value of waters .................................... ... ... 26 Analyses
    [Show full text]
  • Legenere Limosa (Legenere)
    7. LEGENERE LIMOSA (LEGENERE) a. Description and Taxonomy Taxonomy.—Greene (1890) originally published the scientific name Howellia limosa for legenere. He gave the type locality only as “the lower Sacramento” (Greene 1890:81). Based on label information from Greene’s collections, the type locality has been further described as “Fields of the lower Sacramento Valley near Elmira, Solano County, California” (McVaugh 1943:14). McVaugh (1943) determined that this species differed sufficiently from Howellia to be transferred to a new genus, Legenere. Thus, the currently accepted name for this species is Legenere limosa. Legenere is the only species in its genus (Morin 1993), which is in the bellflower family (Campanulaceae). Another common name for this species is Greene’s legenere (Morin and Niehaus 1977, Holland 1984). Description and Identification.—Legenere limosa is an inconspicuous annual. The entire plant is hairless. The main stems are 10 to 30 centimeters (3.9 to 11.8 inches) long and decumbent, although any branches are erect. Extra roots often arise from the lower nodes. The leaves, which are produced underwater, are 1 to 3 centimeters (0.4 to 1.2 inches) long and narrowly triangular; they fall off the plant before flowers appear. The egg-shaped or oval bracts are 6 to 12 millimeters (0.24 to 0.47 inch) long and remain throughout the flowering period. A single flower arises above each bract. Legenere limosa flowers may or may not have corollas, and a single plant can produce both types of flowers. When present, the corollas are white or yellowish, 3.5 to 4 millimeters (0.14 to 0.16 inch) long, and two-lipped.
    [Show full text]
  • Clear Lake Watershed Sanitary Survey Is a Report Made by the Clear Lake Water Utilities to the California Department of Health Services (DHS) On
    PROJECT TEAM PARTICIPATING WATER UTILITIES Buckingham Park Water District Don Bradley Cache Creek Mobile Home Park Steve Grimshaw California Cities Water Company Paul Harris California Water Service Company Tom Fitzgerald City of Lakeport Mark Brannigan Clearlake Oaks County Water District Ellen Pearson Clearwater Mutual Water Company Don Bradley Michael Reust Crescent Bay Improvement Company Roberta Lyons Highlands Water Company Sam Lambert Konocti County Water District William Kochler Konocti Harbor Resort & Spa Jerry Lykkon Lake County Special Districts Steve Brodnansky Nicholas Ring Peggie King Mt. Konocti Mutual Water Company Alan Farr Nice Mutual Water Company Bradley Granger Richmond Park Resort Sharon Ferriera Rivera West Mutual Water Company Don Bradley Westwind Mobile Home Park John Franco Southern California Water Company* David Lancaster CONSULTANT TEAM Archibald & Wallberg Consultants Jeanne Wallberg MWH Americas, Inc. Bonny Starr Robert Zieman Jenni Haas Design Jenni Haas Engelhardt Word Processing Noreen Engelhardt OTHER PARTICIPANTS Department of Health Services – Mendocino District Bruce Burton Leah Walker *For California Cities Water Company TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. ii LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................ES-1
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigated Negative Declaration
    NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT NAME : LOWER LAKE EMERGENCY WATER INTERTIE PROJECT Date of Preparation: June 27, 2019 Lead Agency: Lower Lake County Waterworks District No. 1 Project Description: The project would provide an emergency water intertie between three existing water systems, Lower Lake County Waterworks District No. 1, Highlands Mutual Water Company, and Konocti County Water District. The three water systems serve the community of Lower Lake and parts of the City of Clearlake in Lake County. Project Location: Lower Lake and City of Clearlake, Lake County, CA Findings: Based on the Initial Study dated June 27, 2019, the Lower Lake County Waterworks District No. 1 has determined that: 1. This project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, nor to curtail the diversity of the environment. 2. This project will not have a detrimental effect upon either short-term or long-term environmental goals. 3. This project will not have impacts that are cumulatively considerable. 4. This project will not have environmental impacts that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Public Review June 27, 2019 to July 26, 2019 Period: Public Review: The Initial Study is available (beginning June 27, 2019) for public review at the Lower Lake County Waterworks District No. 1, 16254 Main Street, Suite B, Lower Lake. The Initial Study can also be viewed at https://llcwd.com/current-projects . All documents referenced in the Initial Study are available at the office of Brelje & Race, 475 Aviation Blvd. Suite 120, Santa Rosa.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake County Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) 2016
    Lake County Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) 2016 To achieve a sustainable, resilient, and prosperous economy that provides opportunity for an economically and socially diverse labor force and entrepreneurs that are educated, trained and prepared for future changes while protecting our rural agriculture based quality of life and environment and providing a stable base for quality public services and programs. Table of Contents A. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Key Findings ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Opportunities ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Initiatives ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Resilience…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 B. Summary Background ...................................................................................................................... 4 Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Lake County Overview Map…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5 Document Organization…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..6 Demographics
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Protection Areas
    Thorn Junction Benbow Knob, The 6486 ' EEL Panther Peak R, S FK Windy Mountain Shasta-Trinity 1862 ' 7081 ' Thorn E Vinegar Peak Schofield Peak Six Rivers E L 6549 ' 1992 ' R FK , Little Butte , M M N R Booth Knoll EEL A F B K 5632 ' E T 2427 ' A T Shelter Cove R O C L HUMBOLDT R E Walker Butte K Hopkins Peak , E S R K F 2404 ' A 6749 ' K Reed Mountain W Round Mountain E Sugarloaf Mountain Chamisal Mountain Whitethorn Beall Place 3101 ' R A E L Pilot Peak K 5000 ' L 7367 ' Harvey Peak E A Big Butte R 2598 ' E C Brush Mountain , 4092 ' R 5922 ' M 7361 ' 4200 ' F Island Mountain K D CR Linn, Mount Linn Mount Lake Mountain , N EA IL Moose Peak F F G 8092 ' 2467 ' 3851 ' K O TRINITY 1787 ' LM Oven Lid BA South Yolla Bolly South Yolla Bolly Mountains 6662 ' E Island Mountain L Solomon Peak 2460 ' D 3286 ' 8092 ' E Cooks Valley 7581 ' R C Horse Ranch Peak R, N Twin Peaks FK K 4156 ' F Nielson Place S 7403 ' , R EEL R, L N FK E E Hammerhorn Mountain 7563 ' Noble Butte Andersonia 2435 ' EE L R, Little Butte S FK, E Wildhorse Peak BR 1800 ' R 3564 ' C Piercy Table Rock IS H R F AN C Ramsey 3360 ' DI Island Mountain Delmonico Place IN 3847 ' Bald Mountain Bell Springs Mountain 3938 ' 3861 ' Mina EE L R, M FK Bell Springs R Ball Rock C S Griffin Place 6663 ' Camel Rock E Castle Peak M 3837 ' O 6216 ' Steuben Place High Tip E H E T L R 372 ' , S Mitchell Place F R K L Cold Springs Workcenter Kenny E E Red Rock 6050 ' TEHAMA Red Mountain Little Baldy Beaver Glade Fire Station 4095 ' 3646 ' Pratt Place Buck Mountain Leech Lake Mountain Ball Mountain
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of the Reproductive Ecology and Seed Bank
    California Department of Fish & Game U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Endangered Species Act (Section-6) Grant-in-Aid Program FINAL PROJECT REPORT E-2-P-35 An Investigation of the Reproductive Ecology and Seed Bank Dynamics of Burke’s Goldfields (Lasthenia burkei), Sonoma Sunshine (Blennosperma bakeri), and Sebastopol Meadowfoam (Limnanthes vinculans) in Natural and Constructed Vernal Pools Christina M. Sloop1, 2, Kandis Gilmore1, Hattie Brown3, Nathan E. Rank1 1Department of Biology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA 2San Francisco Bay Joint Venture, Fairfax, CA 3Laguna de Santa Rosa Foundation, Santa Rosa, CA Prepared for Cherilyn Burton ([email protected]) California Department of Fish and Game, Habitat Conservation Division 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1280, Sacramento, CA 95814 March 1, 2012 1 1. Location of work: Santa Rosa Plain, Sonoma County, California 2. Background: Burke’s goldfield (Lasthenia burkei), a small, slender annual herb in the sunflower family (Asteraceae), is known only from southern portions of Lake and Mendocino counties and from northeastern Sonoma County. Historically, 39 populations were known from the Santa Rosa Plain, two sites in Lake County, and one site in Mendocino County. The occurrence in Mendocino County is most likely extirpated. From north to south on the Santa Rosa Plain, the species ranges from north of the community of Windsor to east of the city of Sebastopol. The long-term viability of many populations of Burke’s goldfields is particularly problematic due to population decline. There are currently 20 known extant populations, a subset of which were inoculated into pools at constructed sites to mitigate the loss of natural populations in the context of development.
    [Show full text]
  • Rattlesnakeisland2.Pdf Description of Island and History Of
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number 7 Page 1 Rattlesnake Island Lake County, CA Introduction Rattlesnake Island is the largest Island in Clear Lake encompassing ~56 acres and located in the eastern arm of Clear Lake. It lies ~800 feet off shore of the Sulphur Bank Rancheria, present-day home to the Elem Indian Colony. The island contains 6 recorded archaeological sites ranging in age from ~5,000 years old to the recent historic period. The largest of the 6 recorded sites is CA-LAK-89/H, which represents the ethno-historic village of Elem. All 6 sites contain prehistoric artifacts and features and many contain historic materials that represent the Mexican period (1834-1849), Overseas Chinese period (1850-1900), and recent historical events that have shaped the Elem people. Rattlesnake Island is recognized by the Elem Community of Southeastern Pomo as their place of origin as well as their political and religious center. At the time of the most recent archaeological and historical inspection (1978-81) the cultural sites on the island retained integrity with many original rock alignments and house depressions noted. Rock and brick foundations were found with associated historic cultural materials. The fact that the district is located on an island, coupled with its close proximity to the contemporary mainland location of the Elem Indian Colony have served Looking east at Rattlesnake Island, present Elem to protect the cultural resources it community is on mainland closest to the island.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the Santa Rosa Plain
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for the Santa Rosa Plain Blennosperma bakeri (Sonoma sunshine) Lasthenia burkei (Burke’s goldfields) Limnanthes vinculans (Sebastopol meadowfoam) California tiger salamander Sonoma County Distinct Population Segment (Ambystoma californiense) Lasthenia burkei Blennosperma bakeri Limnanthes vinculans Jo-Ann Ordano J. E. (Jed) and Bonnie McClellan Jo-Ann Ordano © 2004 California Academy of Sciences © 1999 California Academy of Sciences © 2005 California Academy of Sciences Sonoma County California Tiger Salamander Gerald Corsi and Buff Corsi © 1999 California Academy of Sciences Disclaimer Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, publish recovery plans, sometimes preparing them with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, Tribal agencies, and other affected and interested parties. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Costs indicated for action implementation and time of recovery are estimates and subject to change. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific actions, and may not represent the views or the official positions of any individuals or agencies involved in recovery plan formulation, other than the Service. Recovery plans represent our official position only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 9 Issue 2 Time, Movement, and Space: Genocide Article 8 Studies and Indigenous Peoples 10-2015 ‘Reclamation Road’: A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California Jeremiah J. Garsha University of Cambridge Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Garsha, Jeremiah J. (2015) "‘Reclamation Road’: A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 9: Iss. 2: 61-75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.9.2.1292 Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol9/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ‘Reclamation Road’: A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California Acknowledgements The author is grateful to the two anonymous reviewers who strengthened this paper with their careful reading and accurate critiques, to Benjamin Madley who offered valuable feedback on an earlier draft of this paper, and to Jamie Lynnae for her nuanced edits and suggestions. This article is available in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol9/iss2/8 ‘Reclamation Road’: A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California Jeremiah J. Garsha University of Cambridge Cambridge, United Kingdom Abstract: This article is a microhistory of not only the massacre of the indigenous Pomo people in Clear Lake, California, but also the memorialization of this event.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Locations and Description
    April 29, 2019 11719 Amy Newby Director, Parks & Recreation City of San Carlos 600 Elm Street San Carlos, California 94070 Subject: Biological Resources Constraints Assessment for the City of San Carlos Fuel Management Project, San Carlos, San Mateo County, California Dear Ms. Newby: At the request of the City of San Carlos, Dudek conducted a biological constraints assessment for the proposed Fuel Management Project (project) that includes four distinct public parks in the City of San Carlos, San Mateo County, California: Big Canyon Park, Crestview Park, Eaton Park, and Highlands Park (Figures 1 and 2). The currently proposed project would entail a series of vegetation management activities that will abate hazardous vegetation in the four city parks. These parks are largely undeveloped with walking trails that intersect the landscape. Specific goals of the vegetation management project include the following: (1) conduct targeted fuel reduction treatments using hand crews, masticators, track chippers, herbicides, and herbivory to reduce highly combustible underbrush and chaparral within the defensible space zone of adjacent private ownerships, (2) create strategic fuel breaks using hand crews, masticators, track chippers, and herbivory to reduce highly combustible underbrush and chaparral along access roads and ridgelines, and (3) remove dead/diseased and non-native trees as part of a comprehensive fuel reduction effort. As part of the assessment, a reconnaissance-level field survey was conducted to identify and characterize existing biological conditions within the project site including the nature and extent of both common and sensitive natural vegetation communities, wetlands and other aquatic features potentially under the jurisdiction of state and federal resource agencies, and the potential for special-status plant and animal species to occur.
    [Show full text]