DOCSLIB.ORG

Atw Consolidated Car Rental Facility Alterations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ATW CONSOLIDATED CAR RENTAL FACILITY ALTERATIONS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS 011000 Summary DIVISION 01 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 012500 Substitution Procedures 012600 Contract Modification Procedures 013100 Project Management and Coordination 013300 Submittal Procedures 014000 Quality Requirements 015000 Temporary Facilities and Controls 016000 Product Requirements 017300 Execution 017700 Closeout Procedures DIVISION 02 – EXISTING CONDITIONS 024119 Selective Demolition DIVISION 06 - WOOD, PLASTICS, AND COMPOSITES 060660 Resin Panel System 061000 Rough Carpentry 062023 Interior Finish Carpentry 064116 Plastic-Laminate-Faced Architectural Cabinets DIVISION 07 - THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION 079200 Joint Sealants DIVISION 08 - OPENINGS 081213 Hollow Metal Frames 081416 Flush Wood Doors 087100 Door Hardware 088000 Glazing DIVISION 09 – FINISHES 092216 Non-Structural Metal Framing 092900 Gypsum Board 093050 Aluminum Trim 095113 Acoustical Panel Ceilings 096513 Resilient Base and Accessories 096813 Tile Carpeting 099123 Interior Painting 099300 Staining and Transparent Finishing DIVISION 10 – SPECIALTIES 105910 Aluminum Support Brackets DIVISION 12 – FURNISHINGS 123621 Paper Composite Panels 123661.19 Quartz Agglomerate Countertops 124813 Entrance Mats TOC - 1 ATW CONSOLIDATED CAR RENTAL FACILITY ALTERATIONS DIVISION 23 – HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING 230500 Common Work Results for HVAC 230523 Valves 230529 Supports and Anchors 230593 Testing, Adjusting and Balancing 230700 Ductwork Insulation 230914 Control Devices for HVAC 230923 Direct Digital Control System for HVAC 230993 Sequence of Operations for HVAC Controls 232113 Hydronic Piping 233100 Ductwork 233300 Ductwork Accessories 233600 Air Terminal Units 233713 Diffusers, Registers & Grilles DIVISION 26 - ELECTRICAL 260500 Common Work Results for Electrical 260502 Electrical Demolition for Remodeling 260504 Cleaning, Inspection and Testing Electrical Equipment 260519 Low-Voltage Electrical Power Conductors and Cables 260526 Grounding and Bonding for Electrical Systems 260529 Hangers & Supports for Electrical Systems 260533 Raceway and Boxes for Electrical Systems 260553 Identification for Electrical Systems 260573 Short-Circuit/Coordination Study and Arc Flash Analysis 260943 Network Lighting Control 262416 Panelboards 262726 Wiring Devices 265000 Lighting DIVISION 27 – COMMUNICATIONS 270000 Communications Cable and Equipment 270500 Common Work for Communications 275113.13 Overhead Paging Systems DIVISION 28 – ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY 280000 Integrated Security Systems TOC - 2 ATW CONSOLIDATED CAR RENTAL FACILITY ALTERATIONS SECTION 011000 - SUMMARY PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and other Division 01 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Project information. 2. Work covered by Contract Documents. 3. Access to site. 4. Work restrictions. 5. Specification and Drawing conventions. 6. Miscellaneous provisions. 1.3 PROJECT INFORMATION A. Project Identification: Consolidated Car Rental Facility Alterations 1. Project Location: East of the Appleton International Airport terminal on Challenger Drive. B. Owner: Outagamie County. 1. Owner's Representative: Scott Volberding, Operations Manager, (920) 716-8697. [email protected] C. Architect: Aaron Kiesau, Project Architect, OMNNI Associates, (920) 735-6900, [email protected] 1.4 WORK COVERED BY CONTRACT DOCUMENTS A. The Work of this Project is defined by the Contract Documents and consists of the following: B. Contractor work will generally include removing existing construction and constructing a new office and service areas, HVAC, security and electrical will be part of the lump sum base bid. Work to match existing adjacent construction SUM MARY 011000 - 1 ATW CONSOLIDATED CAR RENTAL FACILITY ALTERATIONS 1.5 TYPE OF CONTRACT A. Type of Contract: 1. Project will be constructed under a single prime contract. 1.6 ACCESS TO SITE A. General: Contractor shall have limited use of Project site for construction operations as indicated on Drawings by the Contract limits and as indicated by requirements of this Section. B. Use of Site: Limit use of Project site to landside work as indicated. Do not disturb portions of Project site beyond areas in which the Work is indicated. 1. Driveways, Walkways and Entrances: Keep driveways, airport aprons, and entrances serving premises clear and available to Owner, Owner's employees, and emergency vehicles at all times. Do not use these areas for parking or for storage of materials. a. Schedule deliveries to minimize use of driveways and entrances by construction operations. 1.7 WORK RESTRICTIONS A. Work Restrictions, General: Comply with restrictions on construction operations. 1. Comply with limitations on use of public streets and with other requirements of authorities having jurisdiction. B. On-Site Work Hours: Limit work in the existing building to normal business working hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., unless otherwise indicated. 1. Weekend Hours: Not Restricted 2. Early Morning Hours: Only noise restrictions and Town of Greenville apply. 3. Hours for Utility Shutdowns: Must coordinate with airport in advance C. Existing Utility Interruptions: Do not interrupt utilities serving facilities occupied by Owner or others unless permitted under the following conditions and then only after providing temporary utility services according to requirements indicated: 1. Notify Owner not less than five days in advance of proposed utility interruptions. 2. Obtain Architect’s written permission before proceeding with utility interruptions. D. Restricted Substances: Use of tobacco products and other controlled substances within the existing building is not permitted. E. Employee Identification: Provide identification tags for Contractor personnel working on Project site. Require personnel to use identification tags at all times. SUM MARY 011000 - 2 ATW CONSOLIDATED CAR RENTAL FACILITY ALTERATIONS 1.8 SPECIFICATION AND DRAWING CONVENTIONS A. Specification Content: The Specifications use certain conventions for the style of language and the intended meaning of certain terms, words, and phrases when used in particular situations. These conventions are as follows: 1. Imperative mood and streamlined language are generally used in the Specifications. The words "shall," "shall be," or "shall comply with," depending on the context, are implied where a colon (:) is used within a sentence or phrase. 2. Specification requirements are to be performed by Contractor unless specifically stated otherwise. B. Division 01 General Requirements: Requirements of Sections in Division 01 apply to the Work of all Sections in the Specifications. C. Drawing Coordination: Requirements for materials and products identified on Drawings are described in detail in the Specifications. One or more of the following are used on Drawings to identify materials and products: 1. Terminology: Materials and products are identified by the typical generic terms used in the individual Specifications Sections. 2. Abbreviations: Materials and products are identified by abbreviations published as part of the U.S. National CAD Standard and scheduled on Drawings . 3. Keynoting: Materials and products are identified by reference keynotes referencing Specification Section numbers found in this Project Manual. 1.9 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS A. The contractor is responsible to familiarize themselves with all airport requirements in the plans and in the specifications. PART 2 - PRODUCTS (Not Used) PART 3 - EXECUTION (Not Used) END OF SECTION 011000 SUM MARY 011000 - 3 ATW CONSOLIDATED CAR RENTAL FACILITY ALTERATIONS SECTION 012500 - SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and other Division 01 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 SUMMARY A. Section includes administrative and procedural requirements for substitutions. 1.3 DEFINITIONS A. Substitutions: Changes in products, materials, equipment, and methods of construction from those required by the Contract Documents and proposed by Contractor. 1. Substitutions for Cause: Changes proposed by Contractor that are required due to changed Project conditions, such as unavailability of product, regulatory changes, or una- vailability of required warranty terms. 2. Substitutions for Convenience: Changes proposed by Contractor or Owner that are not required in order to meet other Project requirements but may offer advantage to Contrac- tor or Owner. 1.4 SUBMITTALS A. Substitution Requests: Submit three copies of each request for consideration. Identify product or fabrication or installation method to be replaced. Include Specification Section number and title and Drawing numbers and titles. 1. Architect's Action: If necessary, Architect will request additional information or doc- umentation for evaluation within seven days of receipt of a request for substitution. Architect will notify Contractor of acceptance or rejection of proposed substitution with- in 15 days of receipt of request, or seven days of receipt of additional information or documentation, whichever is later. a. Forms of Acceptance: Change Order, Construction Change Directive, or Architect's Supplemental Instructions for minor changes in the Work. b. Use product specified if Architect does not issue a decision on use of
Recommended publications
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub

    (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub

    US 20140.095539A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0095539 A1 Smit et al. (43) Pub. Date: Apr. 3, 2014 (54) SYSTEMAND METHOD FOR tinuation of application No. 09/933,493, filed on Aug. ASYNCHRONOUS CLIENT SERVER SESSION 20, 2001, now Pat. No. 8,112,529. COMMUNICATION Publication Classification (71) Applicant: MasterObjects, Inc., Zeist (NL) (51) Int. Cl. (72) Inventors: Mark Hans Smit, Maarssen (NL); G06F 7/30 (2006.01) Stefan M. van den Oord, Best (NL) (52) U.S. Cl. CPC ................................ G06F 17/30696 (2013.01) (73) Assignee: MasterObjects, Inc., Zeist (NL) USPC .......................................................... 707/772 (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 14/027,645 The invention provides a session-based bi-directional multi tier client-server asynchronous information database search (22) Filed: Sep. 16, 2013 and retrieval system for sending a character-by-character string of data to an intelligent server that can be configured to Related U.S. Application Data immediately analyze the lengthening string character-by (63) Continuation of application No. 13/366,905, filed on character and return to the client increasingly appropriate Feb. 6, 2012, now Pat. No. 8,539,024, which is a con database information as the client sends the string. Arif ... is A i is Kerstriler listick: ersistent {}:s: Sters is: ritesic sig: liais: lagi Sistisic's Sife fertiei stees Mediate C3:::::::::::::::: issisi Eisik Patent Application Publication Apr. 3, 2014 Sheet 1 of 17 US 2014/0095539 A1 Questobjects {ssrt Ouest(bjecis Server its - {tiestfijects Series: FIG. Patent Application Publication Apr. 3, 2014 Sheet 2 of 17 US 2014/0095539 A1 iii.;; 'ersistent Q38: Store Freferencelas:g&f Sissistic'st Sisyre Sviciikai: -- - .
  • Flutter Basics: the Good and the Bad

    Flutter Basics: the Good and the Bad

    Flutter Basics: The Good and The Bad Flutter has risen quickly as anapp development tool. Originally released by Google in May 2017, Flutter has been used by two million developers since. LinkedIn reports Flutter is the fastest-growing skill among software engineers. This excellent growth is fueled by users’ hopes that it’s an elixir to cure the coding experience of all maladies. Like anything, of course, Flutter has its shortcomings. Let’s take a look. What is Flutter? Flutter is built on the Dart programming language. Developed by Google, Dart was first unveiled in 2011. The language covers the major hot points that a modern language should: it is object-oriented, class-based, and has an added garbage- collector. It has the async, future options out-of-the-box. It has C-style syntax, so should look familiar to JavaScript devs—in fact, devs report they pick up the language quickly. Dart is intentionally simple. Ease comes with costs, so Dart can be executing extra, or less-refined, work in the background. Compared to writing the native code, Dart can be slower and less reliable than a native language. Dart is to JavaScript what Python is to C++. Flutter is an open-source tool for building UIs, particularly on mobile. An essential concept to Flutter is its widgets. Their motto, everything is a widget, is entirely true. All things are widgets. From building layouts with Scaffold and Material App widgets, to BLoC patterns and Provider Widgets, Flutter is built of widgets. Its layouts need to be hand- built, but a few developers created some layout playgrounds to let you build and print the code: mutisya.com flutterstudio.com In this code, you can see how a Text() widget is inside an AppBar() widget is inside a Scaffold() widget.
  • Avionics Systems Development for Small Unmanned Aircraft Vladislav Gavrilets

    Avionics Systems Development for Small Unmanned Aircraft Vladislav Gavrilets

    Avionics Systems Development for Small Unmanned Aircraft by Vladislav Gavrilets Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics at the R ,SSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 1998 @ Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1998. All rights reserved. A uthor ................... .......... ............ Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics May 22, 1998 Certified by ......................... ... \ John J. Deyst Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by ...................... S1 Jaime Peraire Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Students JUL Os)81"8 LIBRARIES Avionics Systems Development for Small Unmanned Aircraft by Vladislav Gavrilets Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics on May 22, 1998, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics Abstract The avionics systems for two small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are considered from the point of view of hardware selection, navigation and control algorithm design, and software development. Some common challenges for many small UAV systems are addressed, including gust disturbance rejection at low speeds, control power, and systems integration. A rapid prototyping simulation framework which grew out of these efforts is described. A number of navigation, attitude determination and control algorithms are suggested for use in specific applications. Thesis Supervisor: John J. Deyst Title: Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Acknowledgments The work described in this thesis was a result of team effort. Here I would like to thank people who contributed to both projects described in the thesis, and otherwise provided support during my two years at MIT. I would like to thank my advisor Professor John J.
  • State Management and Software Architecture Approaches in Cross-Platform Flutter Applications

    State Management and Software Architecture Approaches in Cross-Platform Flutter Applications

    State Management and Software Architecture Approaches in Cross-platform Flutter Applications Michał Szczepanik a and Michał Kędziora b Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland Keywords: Mobile, Flutter, Software Architecture, State Management. Abstract: Flutter is an open-source cross-platform development framework. It is used to develop applications for Android, iOS, Windows, Mac, Linux, and web. This technology was released on December 4, 2018, and it is quite young technology with a lack of good architectural patterns and concepts. In this paper authors compared state management approaches used for Flutter applications development and architecture. They also proposed a combination of two approaches that solve the main problem of existing approaches related to global and local state management. The proposed solution can be used for development even complex and big Flutter applications. 1 INTRODUCTION the Java Script code runs in a separate thread and communicates with native modules through a bridge. Nowadays, almost all type of business needs a mobile Flutter, on the other hand, is ahead of time application to existing. The cost of its development compiled to a machine code (arm/x86) and provides depends on complexity and requirements according better performance and even security related to to market coverage. To reduce it usually hybrid or difficulties of reverse engineering (Kedziora, 2019). multiplatform (cross-platform) solutions are used. Not only the UI components are compiled, but the Unfortunately, this kind of solution usually uses whole logic also. Sometimes Flutter apps are even totally different patterns and architectural concepts faster than native Android application, but it depends compared to native Android or iOS applications.
  • Handbook of European Journalism Lessons and Challenges

    Handbook of European Journalism Lessons and Challenges

    Published by College of Europe Natolin Campus Nowoursynowska 84 02-797 Warsaw, Poland Handbook e-jcn.eu coleurope.eu natolin.eu of European Journalism Lessons and challenges Handbook of European Journalism Lessons and challenges Dominik Cagara, James Breiner, Roxane Farmanfarmaian, Emin Huseynzade, Adam Lelonek, Blaž Zgaga, and winning submissions to the JCN journalistic competition: Karine Asatryan, Fatma Babayeva, Lucy Fulford, Katarina Gulan, Hagar Omran, Lucia Posteraro, Al Mustapha Sguenfle Editor Dominik Cagara This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publi- cation are the sole responsibility of the College of Europe, Natolin and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Unless otherwise indicated, this publication and its contents are the property of the Natolin Campus of the College of Europe. All rights reserved. Published by College of Europe Natolin Campus Nowoursynowska 84 02-797 Warsaw, Poland Handbook of European Journalism Lessons and challenges The College of Europe in Natolin The College of Europe was established by a The advanced Master of Arts in European decision of the Hague Congress of 1948. Many Interdisciplinary Studies offered at Natolin is regard it as one of the founding events of modern designed to respond to the growing need for European integration, and the College's creation experts in European integration processes and the was seen as an important sign of reunification of EU’s external relations, experts who can provide the war-torn Continent. The College of Europe, imaginative responses to today's most complex originally seated in Bruges, is thus the oldest national, regional and global challenges.
  • Operating System Structure

    Operating System Structure

    Operating System Structure Joey Echeverria [email protected] modified by: Matthew Brewer [email protected] Nov 15, 2006 Carnegie Mellon University: 15-410 Fall 2006 Overview • Motivations • Kernel Structures – Monolithic Kernels ∗ Kernel Extensions – Open Systems – Microkernels – Exokernels – More Microkernels • Final Thoughts Carnegie Mellon University: 15-410 Fall 2006 1 Motivations • Operating systems have a hard job. • Operating systems are: – Hardware Multiplexers – Abstraction layers – Protection boundaries – Complicated Carnegie Mellon University: 15-410 Fall 2006 2 Motivations • Hardware Multiplexer – Each process sees a “computer” as if it were alone – Requires allocation and multiplexing of: ∗ Memory ∗ Disk ∗ CPU ∗ IO in general (network, graphics, keyboard etc.) • If OS is multiplexing it must also allocate – Priorities, Classes? - HARD problems!!! Carnegie Mellon University: 15-410 Fall 2006 3 Motivations • Abstraction Layer – Presents “simple”, “uniform” interface to hardware – Applications see a well defined interface (system calls) ∗ Block Device (hard drive, flash card, network mount, USB drive) ∗ CD drive (SCSI, IDE) ∗ tty (teletype, serial terminal, virtual terminal) ∗ filesystem (ext2-4, reiserfs, UFS, FFS, NFS, AFS, JFFS2, CRAMFS) ∗ network stack (TCP/IP abstraction) Carnegie Mellon University: 15-410 Fall 2006 4 Motivations • Protection Boundaries – Protect processes from each other – Protect crucial services (like the kernel) from process – Note: Everyone trusts the kernel • Complicated – See Project 3 :) – Full
  • Fuchsia OS - a Threat to Android

    Fuchsia OS - a Threat to Android

    Fuchsia OS - A Threat to Android Taranjeet Singh1, Rishabh Bhardwaj2 1,2Research Scholar, Institute of Information Technology and Management [email protected] , [email protected] Abstract-Fuchsia is a fairly new Operating System both personal computers as well as low power whose development was started back in 2016. running devices, particularly IOT devices. Android supports various types of devices which is Initially, Android was developed for cameras and having different types of screen size, Architecture, then it is extended to other electronic devices, etc. But problem is that whenever google releases developing apps for these devices are still a complex new updates due to a large variety of devices lots of task because of compatibility issues of native devices doesn't receive updates that are the main devices. issue with android. Android operating system supports various types of This review is about fuchsia and its current Status devices such as android wear devices, auto cars, and how is it different from the Android operating tablets, smart phones, etc. so to develop an android system. app for all these devices is a very tedious task. Keywords: Internet Of Things( IOT ), Operating The Major problem with android is, not all the System (OS), Microkernel, Little Kernel, Software devices receive updates on time. Development Kit (SDK), GitHub Fuchsia is developed to overcome these problems, I INTRODUCTION with fuchsia we can develop apps for all these devices and they can be implemented flawlessly. Fuchsia is an open source Hybrid Real-time Operating System which is under development. A. Architecture of Fuchsia Prior to Fuchsia we already had android OS which is Fuchsia uses Microkernel which is an evolution of used in almost all kinds of devices.
  • Open Source Used in Webex Teams Desktop Client April 2021

    Open Source Used in Webex Teams Desktop Client April 2021

    Open Source Used In Webex Teams Desktop Client April 2021 Cisco Systems, Inc. www.cisco.com Cisco has more than 200 offices worldwide. Addresses, phone numbers, and fax numbers are listed on the Cisco website at www.cisco.com/go/offices. Text Part Number: 78EE117C99-1071047655 Open Source Used In Webex Teams Desktop Client April 2021 1 This document contains licenses and notices for open source software used in this product. With respect to the free/open source software listed in this document, if you have any questions or wish to receive a copy of any source code to which you may be entitled under the applicable free/open source license(s) (such as the GNU Lesser/General Public License), please contact us at [email protected]. In your requests please include the following reference number 78EE117C99-1071047655 Contents 1.1 libilbc 2.0.2 1.1.1 Available under license 1.2 pcre2 10.36-2 1.2.1 Available under license 1.3 ssziparchive 0.2.3 1.3.1 Available under license 1.4 heimdal 7.5.0 1.4.1 Available under license 1.5 curl 7.73.0 1.5.1 Available under license 1.6 openjpeg 2.4.0 1.6.1 Available under license 1.7 skia 85 1.7.1 Available under license 1.8 boost 1.65 1.8.1 Available under license 1.9 curl 7.74.0 1.9.1 Available under license 1.10 flutter 1.4.0 1.10.1 Available under license 1.11 libpng 1.6.35 1.11.1 Available under license 1.12 leveldb 1.20 1.12.1 Available under license 1.13 blink 73.0.3683.75 1.13.1 Available under license Open Source Used In Webex Teams Desktop Client April 2021 2 1.14 uuid 1.0.3 1.14.1
  • Pc104 1884 Spring 01

    Pc104 1884 Spring 01

    Coming of age: A trinity of technology PC/104 – Linux – GPS Figure 1. MZ104 board in the hand – One of the first five origi- nal beta test MZ104 boards. This unit was designed, built, and By Doug Stead tested in less than 60 days. Shown without the SO_DIMM mem- ory module, main memory can be added in sizes 2 to 64 Mbytes using fast SDRAM. Heat is not a problem as the MachZ chip con- sumes less than 0.5 Watts of saving battery power, or engineer- ing additional heat dissipation in sealed enclosures. itary, medical, and telecom environments, or where a desktop system is not suitable. At the heart of the MZ104 is a 133 MHz 486 processor buried within the MachZ silicon. This PC-on-a-chip, measuring What the world needs now, aside from Engineering, has just released the MZ104, 35mm x 35mm, contains all the transistors love, sweet love, are more reliability, a brand new sibling to the world of and logic gates to produce the functional- efficiency, and ubiquity. Over the last PC/104 products. (See Figure 1.) ity of a multi-card solution (See Figure 2). decade, our company has been a witness The MachZ chip uses 0.25-micron tech- and a participant in the maturation of not The MZ104 is a 486+ PC/104 single-board nology and is packaged in a 388-pin Ball only our own technology of embedded computer, which is a fully compliant Grid Array (BGA). When operating at top x86 PC/104 single-board computers and PC/104 CPU engine.
  • Providing Policy Control Over Object Operations in a Mach Based System

    Providing Policy Control Over Object Operations in a Mach Based System

    The following paper was originally published in the Proceedings of the Fifth USENIX UNIX Security Symposium Salt Lake City, Utah, June 1995. Providing Policy Control Over Object Operations in a Mach Based System Spencer E. Minear Secure Computing Corporation Roseville, Minnesota For more information about USENIX Association contact: 1. Phone: 510 528-8649 2. FAX: 510 548-5738 3. Email: [email protected] 4. WWW URL: http://www.usenix.org Providing Policy Control Over Object Operations in a Mach Based System Spencer E. Minear Secure Computing Corporation 2675 Long Lake Road, Roseville, Minnesota 55113-2536 Email: [email protected] 28 April 1995 Abstract 1 Introduction The fundamental tenet on which this work is based is that high-integrity secure and safety- In both secure and safety-critical systems it critical systems benefit from an architecture is desirable to have a very clear relationship which possesses the following characteristics: between the system’s mandatory security pol- icy and its proven operational semantics. This 1. The system must have a clear, mandatory relationship is made clearer if the system ar- security policy which defines its desired chitecture provides strong separation between operation, the enforcement mechanisms and the policy 2. The system’s enforcement mechanisms decisions, and if the policy decision software must provide control over all system op- is clearly identifiable in the system’s architec- erations, ture. 3. The decision logic implementing the sys- tem’s mandatory security policy must be This paper describes a prototype Unix sys- encapsulated in a very limited number of tem based on Mach which provides manda- system elements, tory control over all kernel-supported opera- 4.
  • Treball Final De Grau

    Treball Final De Grau

    TREBALL FINAL DE GRAU Estudiant: Eduard Arnedo Hidalgo Titulació: Grau en Enginyeria Informàtica Títol de Treball Final de Grau: MushroomApp: a Mushroom Mobile App Director/a: Francesc Solsona Tehàs i Sergio de Miguel Magaña Presentació Mes: Setembre Any: 2019 1 MushroomApp: a Mushroom Mobile App Author: Eduard Arnedo Hidalgo Directors: Francesc Solsona Tehas` and Sergio de Miguel Magana˜ Abstract Background. Taking into account the mycological production of pine forests in Catalonia, more than 700 different species of mushrooms have been properly tagged and stored in a Data Base (DB). In this project we present MushroomApp. This App identifies mushrooms, by a simple image, from a corpus made up by the images of the DB. Supervised machine learning classifiers is an efficient mean for identifying mushrooms, and more specifically Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), so it was the one selected in this project. ANN models are created with Google Libray TensorFlow, positioned as the leading tool in the Deep Learning sector. Objective. The objective is to be able to create efficient ANN models using TensorFlow. In addition, we want to investigate a machine learning system to gradually improve our models. Methods. As there are many types of mushrooms, an important design decision was to mark the range of mushroms within the scope of the MushroomApp model. To implement the server we have used Python together with Django. The server is responsible for carrying out the operations of inserting new mushrooms and creating the TensorFlow models of the ANN. We will create these Models through Keras, a library that runs TensorFlow operations. The App is developed with Flutter to run the App on iOS and Android.
  • Google, Where Are You Taking Fuchsia and Should Android Care? 15 August 2016, by Nancy Owano

    Google, Where Are You Taking Fuchsia and Should Android Care? 15 August 2016, by Nancy Owano

    Google, where are you taking Fuchsia and should Android care? 15 August 2016, by Nancy Owano Android Police."There's a massive ecosystem of operating systems designed for embedded hardware, and Google may be working on their own." Why would they call it Fuchsia? "When you begin to dig deeper into Fuchsia's documentation, everything starts to make a little more sense," said Davenport. As with the Linux-Android relationship, the Magenta kernel powers the larger Fuchsia operating system. Davenport offered some details about the rest of the system: "Google is using Flutter for the user interface, as well as Dart as the primary (Tech Xplore)—Projects or experiments at big programming language. The icing on the cake is technology companies go either way. Either they Escher, a renderer that supports light diffusion, soft fail to materialize into actual products but turn up shadows, and other visual effects, with OpenGL or some interesting lessons learned for company Vulkan under the hood." developers and architects. So where does Fuchsia sit on Google's OS food Those insights might even be re-used for different chain? Right now it is a project on GitHub. This target applications, end of story. The other could go a number of ways, said Davenport. direction is that, down the road in a year or three, the project evolves into something real that the It could turn out that Google treats Fuchsia "like company sells. Samsung treats Tizen OS; a lightweight OS used on hardware not suited for full-blown Android," Question of the month about Google now is which Davenport wrote.