HIGH COURT of KERALA Name of Holidays Days of the Week Date NOTIFICATION (1) (2) (3)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HIGH COURT of KERALA Name of Holidays Days of the Week Date NOTIFICATION (1) (2) (3) © Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 tIcf k¿°m¿ dated 5-9-2012 with RNI Government of Kerala Reg. No. KL/TV(N)/634/2021-2023 2021 tIcf Kkddv KERALA GAZETTE B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY 2021 P\phcn 19 Xncph\¥]pcw, 19th January 2021 hmeyw 10 sNmΔ \º¿ 1196 aIcw 6 3 } 6th Makaram 1196 Vol. X Thiruvananthapuram, No. } 1942 s]ujw 29 Tuesday 29th Pousha 1942 PART III Judicial Department THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA Name of Holidays Days of the week Date NOTIFICATION (1) (2) (3) No. D9B(2)-62552/2020. 11th December 2020. All Sundays and Second Saturdays of each English Month Mannam Jayanthi Saturday 2-1-2021 Sub:—The High Court of Kerala—Vacation and Holidays for the year 2021—regarding Republic Day Tuesday 26-1-2021 Summer Vacation—From 12th April 2021 (Monday) Sivarathri Thursday 11-3-2021 to 15th May 2021 (Saturday) Maundy Thursday Thursday 1-4-2021 (both days inclusive). Good Friday Friday 2-4-2021 Onam Holidays—From 14th August 2021 Easter Sunday 4-4-2021 (Saturday) to 23rd August Vishu/Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Wednesday 14-4-2021 2021 (Monday) (both days Jayanthi inclusive). May Day Saturday 1-5-2021 Christmas Holidays—From 24th December 2021 Id-ul-Fitr (Ramzan)* Thursday 13-5-2021 (Friday) to 31st December Id-ul-Ad’ha (Bakrid)* Tuesday 20-7-2021 2021 (Friday) (both days inclusive). Karkkadaka Vavu Sunday 8-8-2021 Gaz. No. 3/2021/DTP (Judicial). 233 4 KERALA GAZETTE [PART III (1) (2) (3) NOTIFICATION Independence Day Sunday 15-8-2021 No. A1-63506/2020. 17th December 2020. Muharram* Thursday 19-8-2021 Sub:—High Court—Christmas Holidays, 2020— First Onam Friday 20-8-2021 nomination of Vacation Judges—Reg. Thiruvonam Saturday 21-8-2021 Ref:—(1) High Court Notification No. D9B(2)-89670/ Third Onam Sunday 22-8-2021 2019 dated 20-11-2019. Fourth Onam/Sree Narayana Monday 23-8-2021 (2) High Court Office Circular No. 2/2018 dated Guru Jayanthi 1-3-2018. Ayyankali Jayanthi Saturday 28-8-2021 The High Court of Kerala will remain closed for Sreekrishna Jayanthi Monday 30-8-2021 Christmas Holidays, 2020 from 23-12-2020 to Sree Narayana Guru Tuesday 21-9-2021 31-12-2020 (both days inclusive) as already notified. The Samadhi Day Vacation Court sitting during Christmas Holidays shall be Gandhi Jayanthi Saturday 2-10-2021 held on 29-12-2020 (Tuesday). Mahanavami Thursday 14-10-2021 Under Section 8 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, Vijayadasami Friday 15-10-2021 the Honourable Chief Justice is pleased to nominate the following Honourable Judges as Vaction Judges for Milad-i-Sherif * Tuesday 19-10-2021 (Birthday of Prophet hearing all urgent matters which are required to be Muhammed) immediately or promptly dealt with during the Christmas Holidays:— Deepavali Thursday 4-11-2021 Christmas Saturday 25-12-2021 Hon’ble Mr. Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shaji P. Chaly Note:—1. * Subject to change depending on the sighting Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas of the Moon. Hon’ble Mrs. Justice M.R. Anitha 2. Employees belonging to the Nadar Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Haripal Community are permitted to avail restricted Only really urgent matters including company matters holiday on 12th March 2021–Friday which are required to be immediately or promptly dealt Ayya Vaikunda Swami Jayanthi. with, will be received in the Registry of the Court during 3. Employees belonging to the Viswakarma Christmas Holidays, provided they are accompanied by Community are permitted to avail Restricted memo giving reasons for urgent posting. holiday on 17th September 2021, Friday – Matters to be moved before the Vaction Judge/Bench Viswakarma Day. may be filed in the Filing Section of the Registry between 4. 1st January 2021, Friday and 18th October 10 a. m. and 1 p. m. on all days except Sundays and 2021, Monday will be non-sitting days for other public holidays. Unless otherwise directed by the the High Court Only. Vaction Judge/Bench, no matter shall be sent to the Judge/Bench on the same day of its filing. By order, By order, SOPHY THOMAS, SOPHY THOMAS Ernakulam. Registrar General. Kochi-682 031. Registrar General. 234 19th JAN . 2021] JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT 5 NOTIFICATION challans in the districts specified in column (3) of the schedule below, upon the Chief Judicial Magistrates/ No. B1(A) 205/2020. 2nd December 2020. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrates mentioned in In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 9(3) column (2) thereof, namely: of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 the High Court of Kerala hereby appoints the Officer mentioned in SCHEDULE Column (1) of the following Schedule to be Additional Sl. No. Name of the Court District Sessions Judge to exercise jurisdiction in the Court of Sessions mentioned against her name in Column (2) (1) (2) (3) thereof, from the date of taking charge. 1 Additional Chief Judicial Thiruvananthapuram SCHEDULE Magistrate, Name of the Officer Court of Sessions Thiruvananthapuram (1) (2) 2 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kollam Kollam Smt. Sujayamma, V. B. Pala 3 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pathanamthitta Pathanamthitta By order, 4 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alappuzha K. P. SUDHIR, Alappuzha Registrar (Vigilance), 5 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kottayam Registrar Subordinate Judiciary, (in-charge). Kottayam 6 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thodupuzha Thodupuzha NOTIFICATION 7 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thrissur No. D7(B)-24125/2020. 14th December 2020. Thrissur In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (1) and (3) of Section 14 of Code of Criminal 8 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palakkad Procedure, 1973 the High Court of Kerala vide Palakkad notification of even number dated 5-6-2020, has notified 9 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manjeri the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-III, Manjeri Ernakulam as Virtual Court with territorial jurisdiction over the whole State of Kerala and further conferred 10 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kozhikode upon the Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate for Kozhikode the trail of criminal cases against sitting and former 11 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalpetta MPs/MLAs of the State, Ernakulam, the Jurisdiction to Kalpetta deal with the undisposed challans in Ernakulam district. As per notification of even No. dated 15-6-2020, the 12 Additional Chief Judicial commencement of the Virtual Court was Magistrate,Thalassery Thalassery notified with effect from the 15th day of 13 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasaragod June 2020. Kasaragod In continuation of the notification dated 15-6-2020 mentioned supra, the High Court of Kerala, hereby (Sd.) confers the jurisdiction to deal with the undisposed Ernakulam. Registrar (Subordinate Judiciary). 235.
Recommended publications
  • In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2020/8TH VAISAKHA, 1942 W.P(C) TMP NO.182 OF 2020 PETITIONERS: 1.KERALA VYDYUTHI MAZDOOR SANGHAM (BMS), I.S. PRESS ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI – 682 018. REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY GIREESH KULATHOOR, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O. K. CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, METER READER, K.S.E.B., UDIYANKULANGARA ELECTRICAL SECTION, THIRUVANATHAPURAM – 695 122; RESIDING AT MANGALYA, NALLOORVATTOM, PLAMOOTTUKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 120) 2.P.S. MANOJ KUMAR, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O. SREEDHARAN NAIR, OVERSEER, K.S.E.B., ELECTRICAL SECTION, ALUVA TOWN, ERNAKULAM – 683 101; (RESIDING AT PARAMATTU HOUSE, V.K.C. P.O., KOCHI – 682 021) BY ADVOCATES SRI. DR. K.P. SATHEESAN (SR.), SRI. P. MOHANDAS, SRI. K. SUDHINKUMAR SRI. S.K. ADHITHYAN SRI.SABU PULLAN RESPONDENTS: 1.STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. W.P(C) TMP NOS.182, 183, 184, 196 & 198 OF 2020 2 2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (FINANCE), FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. R1-2 BY SRI. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.P.HARISH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) TMP HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.04.2020, ALONG WITH WPC.183, 184, 196 AND 198 OF 2020 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P(C) TMP NOS.182, 183, 184, 196 & 198 OF 2020 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2020/8TH VAISAKHA, 1942 W.P(C) TMP NO.183 OF 2020 PETITIONER: 1.AIDED HIGHER SECONDARY TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY S.
    [Show full text]
  • Dated 9Th October, 2018 Reg. Elevation
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA This file relates to the proposal for appointment of following seven Advocates, as Judges of the Kerala High Court: 1. Shri V.G.Arun, 2. Shri N. Nagaresh, 3. Shri P. Gopal, 4. Shri P.V.Kunhikrishnan, 5. Shri S. Ramesh, 6. Shri Viju Abraham, 7. Shri George Varghese. The above recommendation made by the then Chief Justice of the th Kerala High Court on 7 March, 2018, in consultation with his two senior- most colleagues, has the concurrence of the State Government of Kerala. In order to ascertain suitability of the above-named recommendees for elevation to the High Court, we have consulted our colleagues conversant with the affairs of the Kerala High Court. Copies of letters of opinion of our consultee-colleagues received in this regard are placed below. For purpose of assessing merit and suitability of the above-named recommendees for elevation to the High Court, we have carefully scrutinized the material placed in the file including the observations made by the Department of Justice therein. Apart from this, we invited all the above-named recommendees with a view to have an interaction with them. On the basis of interaction and having regard to all relevant factors, the Collegium is of the considered view that S/Shri (1) V.G.Arun, (2) N. Nagaresh, and (3) P.V.Kunhikrishnan, Advocates (mentioned at Sl. Nos. 1, 2 and 4 above) are suitable for being appointed as Judges of the Kerala High Court. As regards S/Shri S. Ramesh, Viju Abraham, and George Varghese, Advocates (mentioned at Sl.
    [Show full text]
  • To Read the Order
    WWW.LIVELAW.IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 22ND SRAVANA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 19580 OF 2019 PETITIONER: M.K.SALIM, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O. HAJI M.K. AHAMED KUNJU, HAJI MANZIL, MAIN ROAD, KOLLAM-691001. BY ADV M.K.SALIM,(Party-In-Person) RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 3 THE STATE ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY (SEIAA), KSRTC BUS TERMINAL COMPLEX, 4TH FLOOR, THAMPANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY. WWW.LIVELAW.IN W.P.(C) No.19580/19 -:2:- 4 KERALA STATE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (KCZMA), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, INLAND NAVIGATION OFFICE, KALLADA HOUSE, ASRAMOM, KOLLAM-691001. 6 THE SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, CORPORATION OFFICE, MUSEUM JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 7 MR. NISHAD M.A., DIRECTOR, M/S. LULU INTERNATIONAL SHOPPING MALL PVT. LTD., 34/1000, NH-47, EDAPPALLY, ERNAKULAM-688007. 8 THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST, PARYAVARAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-110014. BY ADVS. SHRI.MOHAMMED RAFIQ, GP SHRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP, AG SHRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN, SC, SEIAA AND SEAC SRI.M.P.PRAKASH, SC, KCZMA SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON (SR.) SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR (SR.) Mr.JOSEPH RONY JOSE, CGC SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR,SC,TVPM CORPORATION SRI.K.P.SUDHEER SRI.V.MANU, SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN, SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SMT.ANJALI NAIR WWW.LIVELAW.IN W.P.(C) No.19580/19 -:3:- THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 2.08.2021, THE COURT ON 13.8.2021 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WWW.LIVELAW.IN W.P.(C) No.19580/19 -:4:- “C.R.” JUDGMENT Dated this the 13th day of August, 2021 Bechu Kurian Thomas, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing the Independence of the Judiciary-The Indian Experience
    SECURING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY-THE INDIAN EXPERIENCE M. P. Singh* We have provided in the Constitution for a judiciary which will be independent. It is difficult to suggest anything more to make the Supreme Court and the High Courts independent of the influence of the executive. There is an attempt made in the Constitutionto make even the lowerjudiciary independent of any outside or extraneous influence.' There can be no difference of opinion in the House that ourjudiciary must both be independent of the executive and must also be competent in itself And the question is how these two objects could be secured.' I. INTRODUCTION An independent judiciary is necessary for a free society and a constitutional democracy. It ensures the rule of law and realization of human rights and also the prosperity and stability of a society.3 The independence of the judiciary is normally assured through the constitution but it may also be assured through legislation, conventions, and other suitable norms and practices. Following the Constitution of the United States, almost all constitutions lay down at least the foundations, if not the entire edifices, of an * Professor of Law, University of Delhi, India. The author was a Visiting Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and Public International Law, Heidelberg, Germany. I am grateful to the University of Delhi for granting me leave and to the Max Planck Institute for giving me the research fellowship and excellent facilities to work. I am also grateful to Dieter Conrad, Jill Cottrell, K. I. Vibute, and Rahamatullah Khan for their comments.
    [Show full text]
  • In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam Present
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1943 WA. No. 384 OF 2021 [AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.02.2021 IN WP(C) NO. 2966/2021(U) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA] APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS IN THE WPC: 1 M/S. KERALA FASHION JEWELLERY, D.NO.PP/VI, 656, MANJERY ROAD, PANDIKKAD, MALAPPURAM-676 521, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER O.K. BIJU, 4/43, THEKKARA OLARI, OLLUR, TRISSUR-680 306. 2 MR. O.K.ROY, S/O. OLARI KOCHUVAREED KOCHUVARUNNI, NO.4/562, THEKKEKARA PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM-679 322. 3 O.K.JOJU, S/O. OLARI KOCHUVAREED KOCHUVARUNNI, 4/43, THEKKARA OLARI, OLLUR THRISSUR-680 306. 4 MRS. SHEEJA ROY W/O. O.K.ROY, RESIDING AT NO.4/562, THEKKEKARA, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM-679 322. 5 O.K.BIJU, S/O. LATE OLARI KOCHUVEED KOCHUVARUNNI, RESIDING 4/43, THEKKARA OLARI, OLLUR, THRISSUR-680 306. 6 SINDRELLA JOJU W/O. O.K.JOJU, RESIDING AT 4/43, THEKKARA OLARI, OLLUR THRISSUR-680 306. 7 MINI BIJU, W/O. O.K.BIJU, 4/286, NAMBADAN HOUSE, CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR-680 307. 8 KOCHU THRESSIA W/O. OLARI KOCHUVAREED KOCHUVARUNNI, 4/43, THEKKARA OLARI, OLLUR, THRISSUR-680 306. BY ADVS. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF SRI.SATHEESH V.T. SMT.MANJARI G.B. SRI.C.S.ULLAS W.A.384/2021 2 RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN THE WPC: 1 THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICE), NEW DELHI-110 001.
    [Show full text]
  • In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam Present the Honourable the Chief Justice Mr.S.Manikumar & the Honourable Mr.Justice C.T.Ravikumar & the Honourable Mr
    WP(C) No.11316/2021 1 / 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY Friday, the 23rd day of July 2021 / 1st Sravana, 1943 WP(C) NO. 11316 OF 2021(S) SUO MOTU PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE HIGH COURT IN THE MATTER OF EXTENSION OF ORDERS OF STAY GRANTED BY THE HIGH COURT IN WP(C)NO.9400/2020(S) AND CUSTODY ORDERS IN RESPECT OF CHILDREN ISSUED BY THE FAMILY COURTS, WHICH ARE DUE TO EXPIRE OR COMMENCE DURING THE PERIOD OF LOCKDOWN/COVID RESTRICTIONS. RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN WPC NO.9400/2020(S) STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695 001. This Suo Motu writ petition again coming on for orders upon perusing the petition,this Court's order dated 12/07/2021 and upon hearing the arguments of SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP, ADVOCATE GENERAL, SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM, PRESIDENT HIGH COURT ADVOCATES'ASSOCIATION, SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SENIOR ADVOCATE), ADVOCATE SRI.JAWAHAR JOSE AND ADVOCATE SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, the court passed the following: P.T.O. WP(C) No.11316/2021 2 / 8 S. MANIKUMAR, CJ, C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J & SHAJI P. CHALY, J ----------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 11316 of 2021 (Suo Motu) ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2021 O R D E R S. Manikumar, CJ Taking note of the order in G.O(Rt).No.500/2021/DMD dated 6.7.2021, we extended the interim order dated 19.05.2021 and directed the Registry to post the writ petition on 23.07.2021.
    [Show full text]
  • In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam Present
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2014/11TH MAGHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 31947 of 2013 (P) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- JOHN NUMPELI (JUNIOR), AGED 44 YEARS, S/O JOHN, ADVOCATE, CHAMBER NO.104, KERALA HIGH COURT ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION CHAMBER COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682031. BY ADV. SRI.VINOD VALLIKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER/ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-1, OFFICE OF THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, COCHIN CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM-682 021. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-1, OFFICE OF THE TOWN PLANNING OFFCER, COCHIN CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM-682021. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO LOCAL SELF GOVERRNMENT DEPARTMENT , SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R1 & 3 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANITA RAVINDRAN R2 BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH,SC,COCHIN CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-01-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PJ WP(C).No. 31947 of 2013 (P) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT. EXHIBIT P2: THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 18.12.12 OF THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3: THE TRUE COPY OF THE BILL SHOWING THE PAYMENT OF RS.888/- BY THE PETITIONER FOR TAKING COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS. EXHIBIT P4: THE TRUE COPY OF THE COPY OF BUILDING PERMIT
    [Show full text]
  • Reportable in the Supreme Court of India Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Special Leave Petition (Civil) No
    REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 20370 OF 2012 (IA No.58644/2020 – for directions) Massimilano Latorre and others …Petitioners Versus Union of India and others …Respondents O R D E R M.R. SHAH, J. 1. In an unfortunate incident which took place on 15.02.2012, two fishermen who were onboard the boat “St. Antony” registered in India, namely, Valantine @ Jelestine, aged 44 years and Ajeesh Pink, aged 20 years, while fishing off the coast of Kerala, were fired at from a passing ship (an Italian Vessel M.V. Enrica Lexie), due to which the aforesaid two fishermen died. An FIR being Crime No. 2 of 2012 came to be registered against petitioner nos. 1 & 2 herein for offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and other offences under IPC. That the aforesaid vessel which was registered in Italy was reportedly sailing from Singapore to Egypt. That during the investigation two Italian Marines – petitioner nos. 1 & 2 herein were identified as the ones who had fired at the fishing boat. Petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 were apprehended by the police and produced before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kollam. Petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 challenged the jurisdiction of the State of Kerala and the Circle Inspector of Police, Kollam, District Kerala to register the FIR, to conduct the investigation or to arrest and produce the Italian Marine Naval officials before the Magistrate by filing Writ 1 Petition No. 4542 of 2012 before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam. That the petitioners filed Writ Petition No.
    [Show full text]
  • National Conference on Functions of Registrar (Administration) [P-936]
    National Conference on Functions of Registrar (Administration) [P-936] TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE S.No. CASES & MATERIALS NO. ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF REGISTRAR GENERALS (ADMINISTRATION) Duties and Responsibilities of Registrar Generals and Registrars of Allahabad High 1. Courthttp://www.allahabadhighcourt.in/rti/powers_duties_03-05-12.pdf Duties and Responsibilities of Registrar Generals and Registrars of Gauhati High Court 2. http://nja.nic.in/Gauhati%20H.C.PDF Duties and Responsibilities of Registrar Generals and Registrars of Gujarat High Court 3. http://gujarathighcourt.nic.in/rti/RTINote-2-3.pdf Duties and Responsibilities of Registrar Generals and Registrars of Himachal Pradesh 4. High Court http://www.nja.gov.in/Himachal%20Pradesh.pdf Duties and Responsibilities of Registrar Generals and Registrars of Jharkhand High Court 5. http://jharkhandhighcourt.nic.in/rti_act/website_upload_rti-17102014.pdf Duties and Responsibilities of Registrar Generals and Registrars of Orissa High Court 6. http://www.orissahighcourt.nic.in/pdf/rti/RTI.pdf Duties and Responsibilities of Registrar Generals and Registrars of Punjab & Haryana 7. High Court http://highcourtchd.gov.in/sub_pages/left_menu/Rules_orders/rti_rules/pdf/II_registrars.pdf Duties and Responsibilities of Registrar Generals and Registrars of Madras High Court 8. http://www.nja.gov.in/Madras.pdf Duties and Responsibilities of Registrar Generals and Registrars of Bombay High Court 9. http://www.nja.gov.in/Bombay.pdf Duties and Responsibilities of Registrar Generals and Registrars of Delhi High Court 10. http://www.nja.gov.in/Delhi.pdf Duties and Responsibilities of Registrar Generals and Registrars of Kerala High Court 11. http://www.nja.gov.in/Kerala.pdf Duties and Responsibilities of Registrar Generals and Registrars of Tripura High Court, Agartala 12.
    [Show full text]
  • To Whom Does Temple Wealth Belong? a Historical Essay on Landed Property in Travancore K
    RESEARCH ARTICLE To Whom Does Temple Wealth Belong? A Historical Essay on Landed Property in Travancore K. N. Ganesh* Abstract: The enormous wealth stored in the Sree Padmanabha Swamy temple of Thiruvananthapuram, the component items of which were classified and enumerated under the direction of the Supreme Court of India in June 2011, sparked off a major debate on the nature of temple wealth, and on the rights of the temple, the royal family that controlled the temple, and the people as a whole. The issues that have figured in the current controversy can be addressed only by means of study of the history of the growth of temples and their wealth. The Padmanabha temple, where the present hoard has been discovered, is a case in point. In the medieval context, the transformation of landed social wealth into temple wealth impelled the emergence of the temple as a source of social power, one that even kings were forced to recognise. Ultimately, whether described as divine wealth or social wealth, this wealth belongs to the people as the proceeds of their labour. The millions hoarded in the Padmanabha temple are the historical legacy of the millions who have tilled the soil and laboured on the earth for at least a millennium, and shall go back to them and their inheritors. Keywords: Sree Padmanabha Swamy temple, history of Travancore, agrarian history of Kerala, Venad kingdom, temple hoard. The enormous wealth stored in the Sree Padmanabha Swamy temple of Thiruvananthapuram,1 the component items of which were classified and enumerated under the direction of the Supreme Court of India in June 2011, sparked off a major debate on the nature of temple wealth and on the rights of the temple, the royal family that controls the temple, and the people as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\Sc\Desktop\May 2020 Ma
    MAY MAY 20202020 VOL. XIV NO. 05 Single Copy : Rs. 50 Niti Ayog Unique ID No : DL/216/20102111 e-mail : [email protected] RNI REGD. NO. DELBIL/2006/17678 website : www.pensionersmedia.in OFFICIAL MONTHLY ORGAN OF THE BHARAT PENSIONERS SAMAJ, NEW DELHI - 110 014 (Federation of All India Pensioners’ Associations) (Associate NGO, INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION ON AGEING, TORONTO, CANADA) DIRECT SUCCESSOR TO “PENSIONER” ESTABLISHED IN 1955 INCORPORATING ‘PENSIONERS’ COUNSELLOR’ DDR Jitendera Singh MOS (PP) PMO INDIA addressing Video conference with pensioners on 09.04.2020 BHARAT PENSIONER 1 AUR AAP MAY 2020 AAP AUR HUM Index that mortality is higher in older population and mor- 1. Dr jitendera Sigh MOS in webinar . 01 bidity is higher in younger people. However due to weaker immune system older people are 2. video conference report . 02-05 morevulnerable to Covid 19. Good hygienepractices 3. Ordinance, 2020 No. 3 of 2020........... 05 are important to fight against this pandemic. He 4. Corona advisory for sr citizens.. 06-07 urged pensioners to download Aaroygaya Setu 5. BPS writes .. 08 app which provides relevant updated information on 6. RTI reply 09 Covid 19 and also alert you if come into contact of 7. Govt.orders 10-17 any Covid-19 positive person. i) Repealing of Pensions’ Act, 1871. 10 ii) Reimbursement of OPD Medicines- 10 He lauded doctors as Corona warriors for putting iii) Rly hospitals 11 all efforts by stretching their limits in order to en- sure safety of people. He assured pensioners that iv) Treatment of Timeline under CCA India’s health sector is expanding itself to take up & pension Rules 11 v) PCDA Circulars 632 & 633 12-13 its responsibility and Government of India is taking vi) RELHS &CGHS 13-17 all action to ensure safety of people as well as to vii DA/DR freez order 17 maintain smooth supply of all essential things.
    [Show full text]
  • Click Here to Read/Download the Judgment
    WWW.LIVELAW.IN CR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2021/26TH JYAISHTA,1943 WP(C) NO. 21628 OF 2020 PETITIONER: ZACHARIA MARAMKANDATHIL MOHAN, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O MOHAN M.S, 2ND FLOOR, CORPORATION BUILDING, KALOOR, KATHRIKADAVU ROAD, KALOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM-682017. BY ADVS. NAVOD PRASANNAN PATTALI SRI.K.V.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ROOM NO.46, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2 MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, 'A' WING, SHASTRIBHAWAN, RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3 REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (KERALA), COMPANY BHAVAN, BMC ROAD, THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI-682021. BY ADV SRI.T.V.VINU, CGC BY SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASGI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.06.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).21393/2018, AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ncd WWW.LIVELAW.IN W.P.(C) Nos.21628/2020 & Connected cases 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2021/26TH JYAISHTA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 42106 OF 2018 PETITIONER: SOMASEKHARAN AJITH KUMAR, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.SOMASEKHARAN, RESIDING AT T.C.5/1093(1), PERAKATHU, SREEKRISHNA NAGAR, SREEKARIYAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695017. BY ADVS. NAVOD PRASANNAN PATTALI SRI.K.V.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, 'A' WING, SHASTRIBHAVAN, REJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI-110001.
    [Show full text]