DOCSLIB.ORG

An Aerodynamic Study of Bicycle Wheel Performance Using CFD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

An Aerodynamic Study of Bicycle Wheel Performance using CFD Matthew N. Godo, Ph.D. FieldView Product Manager STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Background Wind Tunnel testing used extensively in cycling for over 20 years Typical test for Zipp, 85h at $850/h, conducted 3 or 4 times per year Advertiseme Benefits to cyclists from Wind Tunnels nt ca 2007 Improved knowledge of positioning Significant improvement in the performance of equipment (helmets, clothing, frames, wheels, spokes,…) Enhanced awareness of the role of aerodynamics in the community Current status Still considerable variation in design UCI rule changes & enforcement can be rapid & unpredictable Wind Tunnel reaching its limit today Interpretation of results „controversial‟ STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Tour de France 2008 Stage 20 Individual Time Trial 1 How much does it matter? 2 3 3.0% 4 From Greenwell et.al. 5 6 n o 7 i t Wheel drag is responsible for 10% to i s o 8 P h s 15% of total aerodynamic drag i 9 n i F 10 Rider makes up the majority of overall 11 aerodynamic drag 12 13 Improvements in wheel design can 14 reduce drag between wheels by as 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 Percentage Time Difference much as 25% IronManTM Lake Placid Triathlon 2008 Male 45-49 Age Group Q 1 2 Overall reduction in drag can be on the Q 3.3% Q 3 order of 2% to 3% Q 4 Q 5 6 n o 7 i t i s o 8 P In the ‟05 Tour of Germany, Ullrich‟s Xentis front wheel h s i 9 was mistakenly fitted backward for the Stage 8 time n i trial. Although he won the trial, he finished second F 10 overall to Levi Leipheimer, behind by a final margin of 11 31 seconds. If the wheel had been the right way round, 12 might Ullrich have won stage 8 by a greater margin, 13 perhaps enough to win the race overall? Wheel 14 manufacturer Xentis says „Yes!‟. 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Percentage Time Difference STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Scope Zipp 404 Zipp 1080 Study is limited to Isolated front wheel 13 Rotating 12 Zipp 1080 11 Ground contact 10 9 ] Wheel onlyWheel m 8 c Zipp 404 [ h 7 Wheels* (700c) t p e 6 D m i 5 Zipp 404 R 4 Zipp 1080 3 2 1 Forks 0 Reynolds Full Carbon Aero Blackwell Time Bandit (slotted) Frame (partial) Carbon Reynolds Based on 2005 Razor Elite RANS calculations run for 2 speeds (20mph & 30mph) 10 yaw angles (0o thru 20o) 120 total cases Bandit Blackwell *Continental Podium 19mm tubular tire STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Methodology Overview STARCCM+ v4.06.011 Meshing models Polyhedral Mesh, prism layers Physics models Steady, incompressible, segregated solver RANS Turbulence K-Omega model SST Mentor All defaults applied Low Re Damping Modification turned ON Force Report convergence after 600 iter Low y+ wall treatment FieldView 12.2.1 (Intelligent Light) FV-UNS exported from STARCCM+ Parallel export compatible with FV STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Boundary Conditions Surround Boundary Set upstream flow speed 20mph or 30mph Set yaw angle for specific case 0o thru 20o Ground Plane Set forward axial speed 20mph or 30mph Matches constant direction of travel of bicycle Wheel, hub & spokes Set rotational speed to match forward axial speed Wheel contact Rotational speed matches ground plane axial velocity STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Boundary Conditions (cont’d) Nonconformal interface applied to inner region of wheel Permits accurate ground contact Allows for easy spoke count changes For steady case, Use Moving Reference Frame For unsteady case, Use rotational mesh motion Fork & Frame No-slip surface in relative reference frame STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Postprocessing the Results For the wheel… Resolved Forces Top View Turning Moment Wind Velocity Drag, Vertical & Side (effective) Pressure & Viscous Axial Drag Force Wheel components Bike Velocity Side (Lift) Force (relative) Circumferential variations Turning Moments Based on side forces Vertical Force Side View For the fork… Wind Velocity (effective) Resolved Forces Axial Drag Force Drag & Side Showing Flow Field Features Direction of Wheel Rotation Use streamlines STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light CFD Results vs Wind Tunnel Data Wind Tunnel Protocols vary widely! “Wheel-only” studies mount wheel to floor with upright supports Tests start at 30 degrees yaw, angle gradually reduced Rotational wheel speed independently adjusted at each yaw Ground plane boundary condition differs (wind tunnel floor doesn‟t move) Results are often „normalized‟ STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Drag Forces Zipp 404 Zipp 1080 Drag Force vs. Yaw Angle Drag Force vs. Yaw Angle 1.5 1.5 30mph, Blackwell Fork 1.2 30mph, Reynolds Fork 1.2 30mph, wheel only 20mph, Blackwell Fork 20mph, Reynolds Fork 0.9 0.9 20mph, wheel only 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 ] ] 0.3 0.3 N N [ [ e e 0.4 0.4 c c r r o o 0 0 30mph, Blackwell Fork F F 30mph, Reynolds Fork g g 0.3 0.3 a a 30mph, wheel only r r 20mph, Blackwell Fork D D 20mph, Reynolds Fork 0.2 0.2 20mph, wheel only 0.1 0.1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Yaw Angle [degrees] Yaw Angle [degrees] Drag force varies significantly with yaw angle 10 to 15 degrees yaw is considered a design target by manufacturers Significant differences seen comparing wheel/fork combinations Blackwell slotted fork w/ Zipp 1080 shows considerable promise STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Circumferential Variation, Drag Force Zipp 404 Zipp D i r e c t i o n o f F l o w Zipp 1080 Zipp No Fork Reynolds Carbon Blackwell Bandit STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Side Forces Zipp 404 Zipp 1080 Side Force vs. Yaw Angle Side Force vs. Yaw Angle 6 8 20 30mph, Blackwell Fork 30mph, Reynolds Fork 30mph, wheel only 20mph, Blackwell Fork 20mph, Reynolds Fork 12 16 20mph, wheel only 6 4 ] ] N N [ [ 12 e e c c 8 r 4 r o o F F e e d d 8 i i S 2 S 4 2 30mph, Blackwell Fork 30mph, Reynolds Fork 4 30mph, wheel only 20mph, Blackwell Fork 20mph, Reynolds Fork 20mph, wheel only 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Yaw Angle [degrees] Yaw Angle [degrees] Side force varies significantly with yaw angle Dependence on yaw from wind tunnel studies is generally linear Fork has only small influence on wheel side force Note: Side force scales are different for each wheel STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Turning Moment Zipp 404 Zipp 1080 Turning Moment vs. Yaw Angle Turning Moment vs. Yaw Angle 0.35 30mph, Blackwell Fork 0 30mph, Reynolds Fork 30mph, wheel only 0.3 20mph, Blackwell Fork 20mph, Reynolds Fork 20mph, wheel only -0.2 0.25 ] ] m · m 0.2 · N -0.4 [ N [ t t n n e 0.15 e m m o o -0.6 M M 0.1 30mph, Blackwell Fork 30mph, Reynolds Fork 30mph, wheel only 0.05 -0.8 20mph, Blackwell Fork 20mph, Reynolds Fork 20mph, wheel only 0 -1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Yaw Angle [degrees] Yaw Angle [degrees] Turning moment varies significantly with yaw angle Direction of moment for Zipp 404 acts opposite to Zipp 1080 Significant differences seen comparing wheel/fork combinations Both forks dampen moment on Zipp 404, Blackwell fork amplifies moment on Zipp 1080 STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Circumferential Variation, Side Force Zipp 404 Zipp D i r e c t i o n o f F l o w Zipp 1080 Zipp No Fork Reynolds Carbon Blackwell Bandit STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Flow Structures, Effect of Yaw Zipp 404 Suction Side Zipp 1080 At low yaw, Strong recirculation observed at top, outer edge of wheel Weaker recirculation observed at bottom half, inner edge of wheel As yaw angle increases, Top recirculation extends along front of wheel, combines with inner wheel recirculation STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Flow Structures, Effect of Yaw Zipp 404 Pressure Side Zipp 1080 At low yaw, Backflow zone is created between fork and top of wheel As yaw angle increases, Inner wheel recirculation being driven from pressure side STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Forces on Fork only Zipp 404 Zipp 1080 Drag Force vs Yaw Angle Drag Force vs Yaw Angle 1 1 0.9 0.9 ] ] N N [ [ 0.4 0.4 e e c c r r o o F F g g a a r r 0.3 0.3 D D 30mph, Blackwell 30mph, Blackwell 20mph, Blackwell 20mph, Blackwell 30mph, Reynolds 30mph, Reynolds 0.2 20mph, Reynolds 0.2 20mph, Reynolds 0.1 0.1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Yaw Angle [degrees] Yaw Angle [degrees] Significant differences seen between forks Blackwell Bandit slotted fork has much higher drag force (>2X) Choice of wheel does not significantly affect fork drag Dependence on yaw angle is very low STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Drag Force Profiles on Forks Zipp 404 Zipp 1080 Reynolds Carbon Reynolds Blackwell Bandit Blackwell STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Flow Structures, Slotted Fork Zipp 404 Suction Side Zipp 1080 Flow is drawn into fork slots for all yaw angles, both wheels Flow is pulled away from the wheel rim & tire At higher yaw angles, Flow gets trapped behind fork Strong recirculation pulls flow upward STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent Light Flow Structures, Slotted Fork Zipp 404 Pressure Side Zipp 1080 Flow is drawn into fork slots for all yaw angles, both wheels, AGAIN! Even on the pressure side, flow is pulled away from the wheel rim & tire Pressure side flow at high yaw does not predominantly cross the center axis STAR European Conference © 2010 Intelligent
Recommended publications
  • Electronic Automatic Transmission for Bicycle Design Document

    Electronic Automatic Transmission for Bicycle Design Document

    Electronic Automatic Transmission for Bicycle Design Document Tianqi Liu, Ruijie Qi, and Xingkai Zhou Team 4 ECE 445 – Spring 2018 TA: Hershel Rege 1 Introduction 1.1 Objective Nowadays, an increasing number of people commute by bicycles in US. With the development of technology, bicycles that equipped with the transmission system including chain rings, front derailleur, cassettes, and rear derailleur, are more and more widespread. However, it is a challenging thing for most bikers to decide which is the optimal gear under various circumstances and when to change gear. Thus, electronic automatic transmission for bicycle can satisfy the need of most inexperienced bikers. There are three main advantages to use with automatic transmission system. Firstly, it can make your journey more comfortably. Except for expert bikers, many people cannot select the right gear unconsciously. Moreover, with so many traffic signals and stop signs in the city, bikers have to change gears very frequently to stop and restart. However, with this system equipped in the bicycle, bikers can only think about pedalling. Secondly, electronic automatic gear shifting system can guarantee bikers a safer journey. It is dangerous for a rider to shift gears manually under some specific conditions such as braking, accelerating. Thirdly, bikers can ride more efficiently. With the optimal gear ready, the riders could always paddle at an efficient range of cadence. For those inexperienced riders who choose the wrong gears, they will either paddle too slow which could exhaust themselves quickly or paddle too fast which makes the power delivery inefficiently. Bicycle changes gears by pulling or releasing a metal cable connected to the derailleurs.
  • Analytical Model for the Radial Strength and Collapse of The

    Analytical Model for the Radial Strength and Collapse of The

    6th Annual International Cycling Safety Conference 21-22 September 2017, Davis, California, USA Analytical Model for the Radial Strength and Collapse of the Bicycle Wheel Matthew Ford*, Oluwaseyi Balogun# *Department of Mechanical Engineering #Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Northwestern University Northwestern University 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Keywords: bicycle wheel, strength, buckling, collapse, crash prevention, finite-element modeling 1 INTRODUCTION The bicycle wheel is a versatile engineering structure which serves many functions including supporting radial and lateral loads, transmitting propulsive torque, and sustaining braking loads. When a wheel is overloaded radially it typically buckles laterally (or “tacos”) which renders the wheel unridable. It is both of theoretical interest and practical importance to develop a theory for the strength—and failure—of the wheel. We analyze the failure mechanisms of tension-spoked wheels using a combination of computational and theoretical approaches. There are two primary failures which both lead to wheel collapse: loss of spoke tension, and lateral buckling of the rim. Designing against either failure mode presents a conflict because increasing spoke tension prevents spokes from going slack, but it also decreases the lateral stiffness of the rim, which is under compression due to the spokes. By analyzing these two modes separately and then equating the critical loads, we develop an expression for the wheel strength which is independent of spoke tension. 2 BUCKLING OF SPOKED WHEELS A bicycle wheel may buckle laterally—or “taco”—due to excessive spoke tension, lateral force, or radial force.
  • The Telescope Stand Inspiration for Marcel Duchamp's Bicycle Wheel

    The Telescope Stand Inspiration for Marcel Duchamp's Bicycle Wheel

    Kunstgeschichte. Open Peer Reviewed Journal www.kunstgeschichte-ejournal.net STEPHEN FAWCETT (BALDERTON , NOTTINGHAMSHIRE ) The Telescope Stand Inspiration for Marcel Duchamp’s Bicycle Wheel Readymade Abstract This article is the result of research following on from the author’s previous article on the same subject, ›The Inspiration for Marcel Duchamp’s Bicycle Wheel Readymade‹ written in 2007. In that article the author argued by process of deduction that Duchamp’s Bicycle Wheel was inspired by an improvised telescope stand and was not the product of the artist’s imagination as the artist claimed. This article presents new supporting evidence of a Great War period photograph of an improvised telescope stand made with a bicycle wheel and forks. This article also examines the dating of the first version and construction of the authorised versions of Bicycle Wheel and presents new evidence for the source of the forks component of the 1916 version. <1> Bicycle Wheel is a three-dimensional artwork by French artist Marcel Duchamp (1887-1968). This well-known Readymade exists today in various artist-authorised versions. 1 I have been fortunate to find a Great War era photograph (fig. 1) showing the inverted front forks and wheel of a bicycle being used as a universal type mounting for a telescope, an item of military equipment, exactly as I imagined in my 2007 article. 2 Although this telescope stand does not employ a stool, it nonetheless offers considerable support for my original contention that Duchamp’s Bicycle Wheel was copied from an improvised telescope stand and was not the product of the artist’s imagination as he claimed.
  • R8050 Series ULTEGRA SW-R9150 SM-EWC2 SW-R9160 SM-JC40 SW-R610 SM-JC41

    R8050 Series ULTEGRA SW-R9150 SM-EWC2 SW-R9160 SM-JC40 SW-R610 SM-JC41

    (English) DM-R8050-02 Dealer's Manual ROAD MTB Trekking City Touring/ URBAN SPORT E-BIKE Comfort Bike R8050 series ULTEGRA SW-R9150 SM-EWC2 SW-R9160 SM-JC40 SW-R610 SM-JC41 ST-R8050 SM-BTR1 ST-R8060 BT-DN110 ST-R8070 BM-DN100 FD-R8050 SM-BA01 RD-R8050 SM-BCR1 SM-BCR2 BR-R8070 SM-BCC1 SM-EW90-A SM-RT800 SM-EW90-B EW-RS910 EW-WU111 EW-SD50 EW-SD50-I EW-JC130 CONTENTS IMPORTANT NOTICE ..............................................................................................5 TO ENSURE SAFETY ...............................................................................................6 LIST OF TOOLS TO BE USED ................................................................................20 INSTALLATION .....................................................................................................22 Electric wire wiring diagram (overall conceptual diagram) ....................................................................22 Electric wire wiring diagram (junction A side) .........................................................................................25 Using the Shimano original tool TL-EW02 ................................................................................................33 Installation of the dual control lever and brake cable ............................................................................34 Installation of the front derailleur ............................................................................................................39 Installation of the rear derailleur ..............................................................................................................44
  • Material Comparison for a Bicycle Crank Set-Final

    Material Comparison for a Bicycle Crank Set-Final

    Weight Reduction Case Study of a Premium Road Bicycle Crank Arm Set by Implementing Beralcast® 310 By: Sean Sullivan Chris Huskamp, IBC Advanced Alloys Date: March 4, 2013 Overview The crank set is the device responsible for converting the bicycle rider’s human power to rotational mechanical power. The crank set travels in a clockwise motion, propelling the bicycle forward. Figure 1 shows the first 180º of a complete crank rotation along with the corresponding torque curve. 180º was chosen because this represents the “power stroke”, the remaining portion of the crank rotation is the “dead stroke.” The dead stroke refers to the fact that no torque is generated by the crank, assuming pedal straps are not used. The two cranks which make up the complete crank set are 180º out of phase which allows for a continuous transfer of torque. As Figure 1 illustrates, the torque increases to a maximum at 90º and begins decreasing until once again reaching zero at 180º. The torque curve assumes that the rider applies a constant pedal force. In reality, the applied force drops off as the rider’s leg extends and the torque curve does not possess perfect symmetry about the 90º point. Therefore, the first 90º are of specific interest when examining the loading conditions. There are three main loading conditions which the crank undergoes: axial torque (torque transmitted to the bicycle’s wheel), side torque (bending the crank arm out, in, or twisting), and combined torque (combination of side and axial torque). The maximums for these conditions are: 0º for side torque, 45º for combined torque, and 90º for axial torque.
  • Bicycle Owner's Manual

    Bicycle Owner's Manual

    PRE-RIDE CHECKLIST Bicycle Are you wearing a helmet and other Are your wheels’ quick-releases properly appropriate equipment and clothing, such fastened? Be sure to read the section on proper as protective glasses and gloves? Do not wear operation of quick-release skewers (See PART I, loose clothing that could become entangled in Section 4.A Wheels). Owner‘s Manual the bicycle (See PART I, Section 2.A The Basics). Are your front and rear brakes functioning Are your seatpost and stem securely fastened? properly? With V-brakes, the quick release Twist the handlebars firmly from side to side “noodle” must be properly installed. With while holding the front wheel between your cantilever brakes, the quick release straddle knees. The stem must not move in the steering cable must be properly attached. With caliper tube. Similarly, the seatpost must be secure in brakes the quick release lever must be closed. the seat tube (See PART I, Section 3. Fit). With any rim brake, the brake pads must make firm contact with the rim without the brake Are you visible to motorists? If you are riding at levers hitting the handlebar grip (See PART I, dusk, dawn or at night, you must make yourself Section 4.C Brakes). visible to motorists. Use front and rear lights With hydraulic disc brakes, check that the and a strobe or blinker. Reflectors alone do BICYCLE not provide adequate visibility. Wear reflective lever feels firm, does not move too close to the clothing (See PART I, Section 2.E Night Riding handlebar grip, and there is no evidence of and PART II, A.
  • Calculation of Rear Brake Power and Rear Brake Work During Skidding On

    Calculation of Rear Brake Power and Rear Brake Work During Skidding On

    J Sci Cycling.Vol. 8(3), 33-38 DOI : 10.28985/1920.jsc.06 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Calculation of rear brake power and rear brake work during skidding on paved and gravel cycling surfaces Matthew C Miller1, Aden A Tully2, Adam M Miller1, Stephen R Stannard1 and Philip W Fink1 * Abstract The use of a brake power meter at each wheel of a bicycle is a valid means to calculate energy losses due to braking. However, methodology utilizing the torque and angular velocity at each wheel independently are not able to reflect energy lost to braking when the rear wheel is skidding. This study tested the possibility of using the angular velocity of the front wheel, but the torque of the rear brake, to calculate rear brake power. Two cyclists completed 100 braking trials across three days on a mixture of paved and gravel surfaces with a mixture of skidding and non-skidding. The estimated total energy removed from the bicycle-rider system was calculated as the sum of brake work and estimates of drag and rolling resistance. This energy removed from the bicycle-rider system displayed a strong positive relationship with the change in kinetic energy of the bicycle-rider system during braking on paved (r2=0.955; p<0.0001) and gravel surfaces paved (r2=0.702; p<0.0001). There was no difference between these measurements overall (p<0.05), however there is some error of measurement when skidding on gravel. The findings in the present investigation indicate that rear brake work is underestimated when using the angular velocity at the rear wheel during skidding, but that utilising the angular velocity of the front wheel is a valid means of calculating rear brake power.
  • Finite Element Analysis of Bicycle Wheel

    Finite Element Analysis of Bicycle Wheel

    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 05 Issue: 06 | June-2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BICYCLE WHEEL M.KUMAR1, K.RAJAN2 1,2Lecturer Senior Grade, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Murugappa Polytechnic College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India -----------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - In the traditional realm of Finite Elements, there the rim result in large lateral deformations of the rim, are very few practical applications where the finite code can which may precipitate lateral buckling of the wheel, or be compared to direct measurements. At best, Engineers can failure of other spokes. A loose spoke can interfere with usually only compare their computer analysis with the the smooth operation of the chain, which may result in a results predicted by established mechanical formula. At lost race, a collision, or an injury. worst, Engineers must rely on their experience and intuition to guide them towards a workable” right” answers. This is a familiar structure whose geometrical design has remained virtually unchanged for the past several decades. However, although the design is familiar, and the design effective, it is still not very well understood from a" textbook analysis” standpoint. The optimal design was converged upon by FEM analysis In this project, I analyses the stress, strain & shear force in the wheel structure. The purpose of this analysis is to formulate a finite element model of the bicycle wheel using analyzing software ANSYS. Key Words: Bicycle Wheel, FEA, Stress and Strain Chapter- I 1.0 Introduction to Bicycle Wheel This is a familiar structure whose geometrical design has remained virtually unchanged for the past several decades.
  • An Aerodynamic Study of Bicycle Wheel Performance Using CFD by Matthew N

    An Aerodynamic Study of Bicycle Wheel Performance Using CFD by Matthew N

    A Platform for InnovationTM An Aerodynamic Study of Bicycle Wheel Performance Using CFD by Matthew N. Godo1, Intelligent Light, RutherFord, NJ, 07070 David Corson2, ACUSIM Software, Inc., Clifton Park, NY 12065 (Now Part of Altair Engineering, Inc.) Steve M. Legensky3, Intelligent Light, RutherFord, NJ, 07070 Abstract A methodology is presented to apply CFD to study air flow around a rotating bicycle wheel in contact with the ground. The bicycle wheel studied here is an accurate geometrical representation of a commercial racing wheel (Zipp 404). Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) and Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES) results are computed at a range of speeds and yaw angles commonly encountered by cyclists. Drag and side (or lift) forces are resolved and compare favorably to experimental results obtained from wind tunnel tests. Vertical forces acting on a rotating bicycle wheel are presented for the first time. A unique transition from downward to upward acting force is observed as the yaw angle is increased. Flow structures are identified and compared for different yaw angles. It is expected that a more complete comprehension of these results will lead to improvements in the performance and handling characteristics of bicycle racing wheels used by professional cyclists and triathletes. Nomenclature 2. 2 CD = drag coefficient (= DF /0.5ρ V S) S = reference area, πD /4 2. CS = side force coefficient (= SF /0.5ρ V S) St = Strouhal No. (= f D/V) 2. CV = vertical force coefficient (= VF /0.5ρ V S) t* = dimensionless time (= t V/D) D = nominal bicycle wheel diameter u = velocity vector FD = axial drag force V = bicycle speed (in direction of travel) FS = side (or lift force) β = yaw angle FV = vertical force μ = viscosity f = frequency ρ = density p = pressure 1 FieldView Product Manager, Intelligent Light 301 Rt 17N, Rutherford NJ, Senior Member AIAA.
  • Pedal-Crank Systems. Practice

    Pedal-Crank Systems. Practice

    Br J Sports Med: first published as 10.1136/bjsm.13.4.170 on 1 December 1979. Downloaded from 170 Brit.J.Sports Med.: 1979, 13, 170-172 PERFORMANCE OF A CONSTANT TORQUE PEDAL DEVICE K. SHERWIN, PhD, BSc, MRAeS Division of Engineering Design and Production, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Liverpool, P. 0. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX. ABSTRACT A constant-torque oscillatory pedal-crank device using vertical movement of the feet is described and its performance compared to a conventional rotational cycle. Using a generator to measure the power output the constant-torque device produced 33% less power and thus has no practical value as an alternative to the conventional pedal-crank system. INTRODUCTION time curves in Figure 1, which indicates that ideally a constant-torque device could provide 50% more power Following the publication of a book on man powered than a pedal-crank for the same effort. flight (Sherwin, 1971), the author has received a steady stream of letters from inventors suggesting improved TORQUE 4 mechanisms for transmitting human power to replace ICONSTANTIi A KIT the conventional pedal-crank and chain as used on most > TORQUE man powered aircraft. N 1 / PEDA CRANK The pedal-crank and chain are, of course, highly effi- / cient, having been the subject of extensive development / copyright. on bicycles so that the majority of mechanisms could be / discounted as either unsuitable or impractical, especially / as most were "paper designs" and had not been tried in / practice. However, one particular device stood out from / the rest, because not only was it suggested quite inde- / pendently, by some dozen different people, but at least TIME four of the people have built different versions of the Figure 1.
  • Bamboo Trailer 01

    Bamboo Trailer 01

    Bamboo trailer 01 Welcome Innovative design Places that need a bike trailer The trailer’s innovative for 4 the most, often have the least reasons. capacity to build or buy them. 1) The plans are free to Carry Freedom developed the Document Notes distribute. Bamboo trailer to allow anyone the ability to build a strong This is a work in progress, so 2) Its simple. The trailer can be adaptable trailer from anything. appologies for all mistakes and made with very simple tools and omisions. The ultimate aim is skills. These plans allow a builder to have a document that can be to make a trailer from most followed and understood by most 3) Its flexible. The trailers materials, with pinned joints, and people irrespective of language length width strength and no bending or welding. Whether you culture or literacy. This of materials can be varied.. make it from titanium or bamboo, course will take a lot of time this is a stiff light trailer. It feedback and help. 4) Its strong. The trailer can be varied it in width length strength to weight ratio is near and strength, and made to fold. Copyright of this document perfect. belongs to its creator Carry We are developing this project as Freedom. Copying or reproducing These Instructions a non profit venture. These free this document in whole or in part plans are funded by profits from without our prior writen permision These instructions main aim is our western trailer sales. is prohibited, with the exception to provide, basic layout and of peer to peer distribution.
  • List of Bicycle Parts

    List of Bicycle Parts

    List of bicycle parts Bicycle parts For other cycling related terms (besides parts) see Glossary of cycling. List of bicycle parts by alphabetic order: Axle: as in the generic definition, a rod that serves to attach a wheel to a bicycle and provides support for bearings on which the wheel rotates. Also sometimes used to describe suspension components, for example a swing arm pivot axle Bar ends: extensions at the end of straight handlebars to allow for multiple hand positions Bar plugs or end caps: plugs for the ends of handlebars Basket: cargo carrier Bearing: a device that facilitates rotation by reducing friction Bell: an audible device for warning pedestrians and other cyclists Belt-drive: alternative to chain-drive Bicycle brake cable: see Cable Bottle cage: a holder for a water bottle Bottom bracket: The bearing system that the pedals (and cranks) rotate around. Contains a spindle to which the crankset is attached and the bearings themselves. There is a bearing surface on the spindle, and on each of the cups that thread into the frame. The bottom bracket may be overhaulable (an adjustable bottom bracket) or not overhaulable (a cartridge bottom bracket). The bottom bracket fits inside the bottom bracket shell, which is part of the bicycle frame Brake: devices used to stop or slow down a bicycle. Rim brakes and disc brakes are operated by brake levers, which are mounted on the handlebars. Band brake is an alternative to rim brakes but can only be installed at the rear wheel. Coaster brakes are operated by pedaling backward Brake lever: