Town of Grimsby Heritage Grimsby Advisory Committee Agenda

Tuesday, October 6, 2020 6:00 p.m.

Town Hall, 160 Livingston Avenue

Due to COVID-19 and the closure of Town Hall, meetings are available through electronic participation: https://vimeo.com/grimsbycouncilchambers Page

1. Call to Order

2. Disclosure of Interest

3. Minutes

3 - 6 a) Grimsby Heritage Advisory Committee - 03 Mar 2020 - Minutes

4. Introductions

5. Updates

a) Verbal Update: 35 Main Street West

b) Verbal Updates: 262 Main Street West

c) Verbal Update: 352 Main Street West

d) Verbal Update: Grimsby Beach Study

e) Verbal Update: 493 Ridge Road West

6. Meet The Director

Page 1 of 198 Grimsby Heritage Advisory Committee October 6, 2020 Agenda Page 7 - 22 a) Presentation

b) Question and Answer

7. Reports

23 - 50 a) Designation Report -104 Main Street East

51 - 81 b) Designation Report - 130 Main Street East

82 - 114 c) Designation Report - 141 Main Street East

115 - 148 d) Designation Report - 147 Main Street East

149 - 173 e) Designation Report - 224 Main Street East

174 - 182 f) Updated Status and Activity Report

8. Correspondence

183 - 192 a) Correspondence - Local Planning Appeal Tribunal

9. Notice Of Motions

193 - 198 a) Requested by Councillor Bothwell, re: Draft Bylaw for Heritage Conservation District Study Area

10. New Business

11. Adjournment

If you require any accommodations for a disability in order to attend or participate in meetings or events, please contact the Accessibility Advisory Administrator at 905 309-2015 or [email protected]

Page 2 of 198 The Corporation of the Town of Grimsby

Heritage Grimsby Advisory Committee Minutes

Town Hall Council Chambers

160 Livingston Avenue

March 3 2020

Present: Councillor J. Dunstall, Chair Councillor D. Bothwell A. Brabant O. Jurychuk

Absent: K. Sharrow

Staff: H. Schlange, CAO, W. Basic, Acting Director of Planning, Building &

Bylaw & B. Verrecchia, Assistant Heritage Planner Also in Attendance: Councillor R. Freake, Councillor R. Vaine, Oscar Danieli & Wendy Coles

1. Call to Order

a) The meeting was called to order at 6:00 P.M.

2. Disclosure of Interest

a) There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest.

3. Minutes

a) Grimsby Heritage Advisory Committee - 4 February 2020 - Minutes

The Committee reviewed the minutes from the previous Heritage Advisory Committee meeting. The Committee noted that the address of 575 Main St E needs to be changed to 575 Main St W and asked if the agenda needed to be updated to reflect this change. The Committee then received the minutes.

b) Grimsby Heritage Advisory Committee - 27 February 2020 - Minutes

The Committee received the minutes from the special Heritage Advisory Committee meeting.

Page 3 of 198 Page 2 of 4

Heritage Grimsby Advisory Committee March 3, 2020

4. Delegations

a) Oscar Danieli & Wendy Coles- 242 Main Street E.

The delegations addressed questions from the Committee members about the age of the home and the materials on the exterior front façade.

5. Memorandum

a) Heritage Register Update

The Committee reviewed the memorandum that provided background for Council's attention with respect to the proposed inclusion of properties on the Municipal Heritage Register. The Committee agreed with the three properties that were identified in the memorandum and added an additional property (132 Main Street E.). Staff informed the Committee that their suggested list of properties to be added to the Municipal Heritage Register had been exhausted and that Staff would need a new list if they wanted to continue to add properties at each Heritage Grimsby Advisory Committee meeting.

GH-20-16 Moved by A. Brabant; Seconded by O. Jurychuk; Resolved,

That the following properties be listed on the Town of Grimsby Municipal Heritage Register.

6 Boulton Avenue 264 Kerman Avenue 30 Murray Street 132 Main Street East CARRIED

b) Heritage Committee - Terms of Reference By-law

The Committee reviewed the Terms of Reference By-law and discussed the Committee membership.

c) Self Evaluation Questionnaire

The Committee discussed the Self Evaluation Questionnaire. The Committee agreed to fill this out together at the end of the year before the completion of the budget for the Committee to reflect on accomplishments of the year and plans for the next year.

GH-20-17 Moved by D. Bothwell; Seconded by O. Jurychuk;

Page 4 of 198 Page 3 of 4

Heritage Grimsby Advisory Committee March 3, 2020

Resolved, that the self-evaluation questionnaire attached to the memo dated March 3, 2020 be approved for Committee use.

CARRIED

d) Committee Workplan

The Committee discussed their Workplan and during this discussion member A. Brabant presented an update on her research about the reporting structure of local Heritage Advisory Committees, during this update it was noted that most of the local Committees do not report directly to Council and rather through Standing Committees.

6. Reports

a) 242 Main Street E. -Porch Demolition Permit Application

Staff presented an overview of the report. During the discussion the Committee expressed their support of the design as they felt the proposed design was more compatible then the existing porch. The Committee then passed the following resolution.

GH-20-18 Moved by A. Brabant; Seconded by D. Bothwell;

Resolved, that Report G.H. 20-03 regarding the application for a demolition permit for a porch on the building at 242 Main Street East be received;

And that the Heritage Grimsby Advisory Committee recommends that council pass a resolution to allow for the demolition of the subject porch prior to the closing of the 60 day notice period required under the Ontario Heritage Act;

And that the porch be documented with photographic recording of the exposed dwelling at the completion of demolition to the satisfaction of the Acting Director of Planning and copies be returned to the Heritage Advisory Committee.

CARRIED b) Updated Status and Activity Report

Staff updated the Committee on changes made to the Status and Activity Report. During the update the Committee requested more information on the Designation Report for 122 Main Street E. and the status of Staff’s review concerning adding curtilage to the designation report. Staff informed the Committee that the review is ongoing as the curtilage needs to be evaluated and will require supporting materials to be included in the Designation Report. During the discussion the Committee stated their

Page 5 of 198 Page 4 of 4

Heritage Grimsby Advisory Committee March 3, 2020

concerns that without curtilage in the designation report there could potentially be a severance on the property in the future. The Committee then passed the following resolution.

GH-20-19 Moved by A. Brabant; Seconded by D. Bothwell; Resolved,

That Heritage Grimsby Advisory Committee requests Town Staff to contact for a quote Letourneau Heritage Consulting Inc. to investigate the merit of adding curtilage to the designation report of 122 Main Street East and circulate to Committee members.

CARRIED

The Committee requested that all changes made to the Status and Activity Report be highlighted. The Committee requested an update on the Terms of Reference for Grimsby Beach. Staff informed the Committee that the draft Terms of Reference had been completed and was submitted to the Region for review. The Committee requested an update on the Young Canada Works grant from Staff. Staff informed the Committee that they would not be applying for the Young Canada Works position and instead would be looking at other staffing options that would better address current work volume demands.

7. New Business

a) The Committee discussed the strategy for adding properties to Municipal Heritage Register. The Committee discussed adding some of the properties on Main Street as a priority. The Committee agreed to bring this discussion to the next Grimsby Heritage Advisory Committee meeting. The Committee discussed the removal process for the Heritage Register.

8. Adjournment

a) There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:30 P.M.

Councillor J. Dunstall, B. Verrecchia, Assistant Chair Heritage Planner

If you require any accommodations for a disability in order to attend or participate in meetings or events, please contact the Accessibility Advisory Administrator at 905 309-2015 or [email protected]

Page 6 of 198 GRIMSBY HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

October 6, 2020 Page 7 of198 Updates – 35 Main St W

Building Permit Application -Municipal Heritage Register -Listed -Heritage Permit Not Required

Converting a window into a door. Page 8 of198

Proposed door Updates – 262 Main St W

Heritage Restoration -Designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act - Maintenance is underway - - Qualified Professional - -Time sensitive

Plaster Repair

Nonintrusive Intervention Page 9 of198 Window being repaired due to vandalism

Significant Cracks Concreted mortars causing significant damage. Updates – 352 Main St W

Building Permit Application – Adjacent to a designated property. Page 10 of198

The subject property has a narrow side yard and the adjacent heritage building is close to the property line. It is therefore recommended that special care be taken during excavation work in this area. It is also noted that the heritage house has a slate roof that may be sensitive to vibrations. – Heritage Impact Assessment Updates – Grimsby Beach Study

Land Use Planning Study – with significant heritage component

MHBC selected as consultant to lead project.

Project Kick-Off and material transfer complete.

Grimsby Beach Circa 1890’s – Grimsby Museum Collection

Selection of Steering Committee representative Page 11 of 198

Walking Tour

Grimsby Beach Circa 1885 – Grimsby Library Collection 493 Ridge Road West

Minor Variance Application -Municipal Heritage Register

493 Ridge Road West will be added to the list of properties that need to be Page 12 of198 evaluated for heritage significance against the Ontario Regulation 9/06.

Index card #154 from our inventory catalogue. There is some preliminary information on the Index card. Meet the Director – Antonietta Minichillo

Committed to Heritage Conservation: • Member of the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CAHP)

• Board of Directors for Ontario Association of Heritage Professionals

• Masters of Environmental Studies, Thesis on the Economics of Heritage Preservation

• Recipient of the Lieutenant Governor’s Ontario Heritage Award for Community Leadership

• Contributor to University of Waterloo Study on the Heritage Designation and Property Values: Is there an Effect?

• Restored municipally owned buildings – Alderlea, CPR Station, Ebenezer, PAMA Page 13 of198 Team Work Makes the Dream Work

• Engaged Citizenry • Unique Community • Exciting Opportunities • Learning Sessions • Staffing Up to Rise to the Challenge Page 14 of198 Key Goals

• Elevate the Heritage Portfolio • Increase Part IV Designations • Update Heritage Register and Inventory • Create Outreach and Marketing Materials • Newsletter • Walking Tour • Brochures and FAQ’s • Develop an Annual Plaque and Awards Ceremony • Collaboratively Create Heritage Work Plan 2021-2022 • Dedicated Heritage Resource for Town Page 15 of198 104 Main Street East

Pursing Designation Under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act Page 16 of198

Location Front Elevation 130 Main Street East

Pursing Designation Under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act Page 17 of198

Location Front Elevation 141 Main Street East

Pursing Designation Under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act Page 18 of198

Location Front Elevation 147 Main Street East

Pursing Designation Under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act Page 19 of198

Location Front Elevation 224 Main Street East

Amending a Designation Bylaw- adding significant attributes Page 20 of198

Location Front Elevation Status & Activity Sheet Page 21 of198 New Business

• GIS & Heritage • 133 Main Street East Archaeology • Street Names Page 22 of198 +"*êþ n PLANNING DEPARTMENT v MEMORANDUM TO: J. Dunstall, Chair and Members of the Heritage Advisory Committee

FROM: Antonietta Minichillo, Director of Planning

RE Designation Reports

DATE October 6,2020

Please see enclosed the designation reports and staff recommendations for the following properties:

104 Main Street East 130 Main Street East 141 Main Street East 147 Main Street East 224 Main Street East

The subject properties have been identified as having cultural heritage value and interest, as defined by the Ministry of Culture under Ontario Regulation 9/06. These heritage resources have been found to meet the criteria and are all being recommended for designation under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Below are the key steps to designating an individual property under section 29 ol the Ontario Heritage Acú below:

1. ldentifying the property as a candidate for designation; 2. Researching and evaluating the property; 3. Serving Notice of lntention to Designafe, with an opportunity for objection; 4. Passing and registering the designation by-law; 5. Adding the property on the municipal register of designated properties; and 6. Listing on the provincial register. lf Council directs staff to proceed with the designation of the above heritage resources, Staff will prepare and serve the Notice of lntention to Designate under part lV of the Ontario Heritage AcL Designation under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Acf is a process that is subject to appeal by property owners and other members of the public. lf no objections are filed with the municipality within 30 days after the date of the publication of Notice in the newspaper, Council can proceed to pass a bylaw designating the property. The by- law is then registered on title. lf an objection to a designation is filed with the municipality within the 30-day period, Council must refer the objection to the Conservation Review Board (CRB) for a hearing. The Ontario Heritage Acf mandates this tribunalto conduct hearings and make recommendations to Council regarding objections to proposals to designate, as well as other Council decisions under Part lV of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Page 23 of 198 Following the hearing, the CRB writes a report to Council with its recommendation on whether or not the property should be designated. Council is not bound to follow the recommendation of the CRB, however. After considering the CRB recommendation, Council may decide to go ahead with the designation, or to withdraw its intention to designate.

Should Council decide to proceed with designation, it may then pass a designation bylaw

Prepared by: Approved by:

Bianca Verrecchia, Antonietta Minichillo, MES, RPP, CAHP Assistant Heritage Planner Director of Planning

Page 24 of 198

Heritage Research Report

HERITAGE RESEARCH 104 Main St E October REPORT Grimsby, Ontario 2020

Page 25 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

INFORMATION SUMMARY

PROPERTY INFORMATION

Address: 104 MAIN ST E GRIMSBY, ON, CAN, L3M1N8

Roll Number: 261502001718800

Short Legal Description: PT LT 7 CON 2, North Grimsby (FMLY PCL 8); PT 1, 30R-588 ; GRIMSBY

Heritage Type: Built Structure

Heritage Status: Listed Heritage Property

OWNER INFORMATION

Names of Owners: RICHARD AND HELEN MCGREGOR

Owners Address: 104 MAIN ST E GRIMSBY, ON, CAN, L3M1N8

Mailing Address: 104 MAIN ST E GRIMSBY, ON, CAN, L3M1N8

REPORT INFORMATION Report Purpose: Pursuing designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Date: October 2020

Designation Brief Bianca Verrecchia, Assistant Heritage Planner Completed by: - Heritage Conservation Diploma– Williowbank School of Restoration Arts 2019 - Architectural Technologist Advanced Diploma – 2014

Antonietta Minichillo, MES, RPP, CAHP, Director of Planning, Building & By-Law

- Undergrad York University Geography and Urban Studies - Masters in Environmental Studies, Planning Stream, York University - Masters Thesis: The Economics of Heritage Preservation: A Case Study on the John Street Roundhouse

Janice Hogg, MCIP, RPP, Senior Planner

- Masters of Heritage Conservation – University of Sydney 2009 - Bachelor of Environmental Studies, Honors Planning – University of Waterloo 2005

2 Page 26 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

References: 1876 Lincoln & Welland Atlas, People and Places from Grimsby’s Past – Van Dusen, Who were the Neutral People – canadianheritagematters.weebly.com, News article from Grimsby Independent – Grimsby Archives, People and Places of Grimsby’s Past – Bowslaugh & Annals of the Forty- No. 3- Bowslaugh, Greetings from Grimsby Park, The Chautauqua of Canada, Dorothy Turcotte and Jean Jarvis, 1985, Once Upon a Little Town…Grimsby: 1876 to 1976 By: Ada Bromley & Jean Powell, Grimsby Historical Society: Rannie Publications, 1979

3 Page 27 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

1. INTRODUCTION

This report was prepared to assess the building at 104 Main Street against the criteria for the Ontario Heritage Act for designation under Section 29, Part IV of the Act. Research was undertaken by consulting primary and secondary sources and site visits were undertaken to evaluate the dwelling and take photographs. Currently, this building is a private residential home built in 1885, and is located along the historic Main Street corridor which Council has identified as a cultural heritage landscape (CHL). Research was conducted in the summer/fall of 2019 and was completed by Town Staff.

1.1 REPORT LIMITATIONS

The limitations of this report are based on missing information from the time this structure was constructed in the late 1800s. During the research phase of this report several resources were used, these included: the Grimsby Historical Society Collection, Our Ontario, Ancestry, Land Registry Record on Microfilms, Annals at the Forty (produced by the historical society in 1955), Peoples & Places from Grimsby’s Past by Dorothy Turcotte, and Once upon a Little Town by Grimsby Historical Society. During the production of this report information was required and unfortunately based on the age of the structure and the lack of documentation over the last hundred plus years we were unable to identify all historical information.

Note: There was no structural evaluation conducted and all analysis was completed based on observation from the public realm. There was only an exterior analysis.

2.0 STUDY APPROACH

The analysis of this report was completed in conjunction with the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. During the analysis the following was prepared:

1. Description of Property 2. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest. 3. Description of Heritage Attributes and 4. Legal Description

2.1 DEFINITIONS & ABBREVATIONS

2.2.1 Abbreviations

CHL- Cultural Heritage Landscape

GPS- Global Positioning System

HG&B- Hamilton Grimsby and Beamsville Electric Railway

ICOMOS- International Council on Monuments and Sites

LPAT- Local Planning Appeal Tribunal

MHR- Municipal Heritage Register

4 Page 28 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

MHSTCI- Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries

NHSC- National Historic Site of Canada

NTS- National Topographic Systems

OBC- Ontario Building Code

OHA- Ontario Heritage Act

OP- Official Plan

O. Reg 9/06 – Ontario Regulation 9/06- Criteria for determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.

Section 29- Part IV- Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act is the designation of a heritage property.

Section 29- Part V- Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act is the designation of a heritage conservation district.

ZBL- Zoning Bylaw

2.2.2 Definitions

Adaptation: Modification of a heritage item to suit a proposed, compatible use.

Alter: “alter” means to change in any manner and includes to restore, renovate, repair or disturb and “alteration” has a corresponding meaning; (“transformer”, “transformation”)

Archaeology: A set of theories, methods and techniques for the study of human culture and civilization, using scientific investigation of physical remains of past activities. Archaeological Resource: All tangible evidence of human activity that is of historical, cultural or scientific interest. Examples include features, structures, archaeological objects or remains at or from an archaeological site, or an object recorded as an isolated archaeological find.

Archaeological Sites: A place or area where tangible evidence of human activity of historical, cultural or scientific interest is or was located on, above or below the ground, whether submerged or not. The identification, recovery and interpretation of this evidence can be carried out using archaeological research methods.

Artefacts: Any object manufactured, used, moved or otherwise modified by human beings, including all waste materials and by-products of these processes.

Attribute: A property or quality of any archaeological object such as the length of a projectile point, the hardness of a potsherd or the colour of a bottle fragment.

5 Page 29 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

Built Heritage Resources: a building, structure, monument, installation or any manufactured remnant that contributes to a property's cultural heritage value or interest as identified by a community, including an Aboriginal Indigenous community. Built heritage resources are generally located on property that has been designated under Parts lV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act, or included on local, provincial and/or federal registers.

Character-defining elements: The materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings that contribute to the heritage value of a historic place, and which must be retained in order to preserve its heritage value.

Construction date: The date of construction of the historic place (may be approximate).

Conservation: All actions or processes that are aimed at safeguarding the fundamental characteristics of a cultural resource in order to preserve its heritage value and extend its physical life. This may involve “preservation,” “rehabilitation,” “restoration” or a combination of these actions or processes.

Consultation: The term public consultation refers to the two-way process of providing and seeking information and advice from the general public, governments, Aboriginal peoples, interest groups and others on the management of protected heritage places. Consultation is only one of the many aspects of the overall public engagement.

Culture: The concept of culture can be defined as the “set of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual and emotional features of society or a social group” encompassing,“ in addition to art and literature, lifestyles, ways of living together, value systems, traditions and beliefs.”

Cultural Heritage Landscapes; a defined geographical area that may have been modified by human activity and is identified as having cultural heritage value or interest by a community, including an Aboriginal indigenous community. The area may involve features such as structures, spaces, archaeological sites or natural elements that are valued together for their interrelationship, meaning or association. Examples may include, but are not limited to, heritage conservation districts designated under the Ontario Heritage Act; villages, parks, gardens, battlefields, main streets and neighbourhoods, cemeteries, trail ways, view sheds, natural areas and industrial complexes of heritage significance; and areas recognized by federal or international designation authorities (e.g. a National Historic Site or District designation, or a UNESCO World Heritage Site).

Demolition: The damaging, defacing, destroying or dismantling of a heritage item or a component of a heritage conservation area, in whole or in part.

Façade: The face of a building; an architectural drawing of the vertical projection of the face of a building.

Guidelines: Statements that provide practical guidance in applying the Standards for the conservation of historic places. They are presented here in a format that provides recommended and non-recommend actions.

6 Page 30 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

Heritage Attribute: “heritage attributes” means, in relation to real property, and to the buildings and structures on the real property, the attributes of the property, buildings and structures that contribute to their cultural heritage value or interest

Heritage Fabric: All the physical material of an item, including surroundings and contents which contribute to its heritage significance.

Historic Place: A structure, building, group of buildings, district, landscape, archaeological site or other place in Canada that has been formally recognized for its heritage value by an appropriate authority within a jurisdiction.

Heritage Resource: A Heritage Area or any natural or cultural features associated with heritage areas or potential Areas.

Historical Value: The aesthetic, historic, scientific, cultural, social or spiritual importance or significance for past, present or future generations. The heritage value of a historic place is embodied in its character-defining materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings.

Inspect: “inspect” includes to survey, photograph, measure and record

Microfilm: A length of film containing microphotographs of documents.

Owner: means the person registered on title in the proper land registry office as owner.

Place: A site, area or landscape or group of works, together with associated structures, contents and surrounds.

Preservation: The action or process of protecting, maintaining and/or stabilizing the existing materials, form and integrity of a historic place, or of an individual component, while protecting its heritage value.

Protected Heritage Property: property designated under Parts lV, V or Vl of the Ontario Heritage Act; property subject to a heritage conservation easement under Parts ll or lV of the Ontario Heritage Act; property identified by the Province and prescribed public bodies as provincial heritage property under the Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties; property protected under federal legislation, and UNESCO World Heritage Sites.

Rarity: An item having this value is significant because it represents a rare, endangered or unusual aspect of our history or cultural heritage.

Reconstruction: Returning a place as nearly as possible to a known earlier state by the introduction of new or old materials into the fabric.

Rehabilitation: The action or process of making possible a continuing or compatible contemporary use for a historic place, or of an individual component, through repair, alterations and/or additions, while protecting its heritage value.

7 Page 31 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

Restoration: The action or process of accurately revealing, recovering or representing the state of a historic place, or of an individual component, as it appeared at a particular period in its history, while protecting its heritage value.

Tribunal: means the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal

2.2 METHODOLOGY

This report follows a three-step approach to understanding and planning for cultural heritage resources:

•Understanding the heritage planning regulatory framework;

•Understanding the significance of heritage resource (known and potential); and,

•Understanding the existing conditions of the property.

This is consistent with the recommended methodology outlined by the Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries (MHSTCI) within its 2006 publication Heritage Property Evaluation. The MHSTCI identifies three key steps: Historical Research, Site Analysis, and Evaluation. This was augmented with a policy analysis to outline the provincial and local policy contexts.

2.3 LEGISLATIVE POLICY

In the Province of Ontario, the process for determining cultural heritage value is prescribed via O. Reg. 9/06 of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). Further, in order to better understand the local context for evaluation of cultural heritage value or interest under the OHA, it must be determined if there are any supplemental municipal approaches or priorities that augment the provincially established process. For example, a municipality can build on the criteria of O.Reg. 9/06 by using adopted thematic history; identifying specific views in its Official Plan; or by adopting an evaluative template. The legislative and policy framework for this report is presented in Section 3 below.

3.0 POLICY FRAMEWORK

Policy framework has been created to ensure the conservation of heritage sites and architectural attributes. The following policies have been put in place from both the municipal and provincial level. These policies are as follows:

1. Provincial Policy Statement 2. Regional Official Plan 3. Town of Grimsby Official Plan 4. Growth Plan For The Greater 5. Escarpment Plan 6. Council Identified Cultural Heritage Landscapes

8 Page 32 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

3.1 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT

The following provisions are from the Provincial Policy Statement and pertains to Cultural Heritage.

2.6 Cultural heritage and archaeology

2.6.1 Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved.

2.6.3 Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.

2.6.5 Planning authorities shall consider the interests of Aboriginal communities in conserving cultural heritage and archaeological resources.

3.2 REGIONAL OFFICAL PLAN

The following provisions are from the Regional Official Plan and pertains to Cultural Heritage.

10. C.2 Policies

Policy 10. C.2.1 -Built Heritage Resources, Cultural Heritage Landscapes and Archaeological Resources

Policy 10.C.2.1.1 Significant built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved using the provisions of the Heritage Act, the Planning Act, the Environmental Assessment Act, the Funeral, Burial and Cremations Act and the Municipal Act.

Policy 10.C.2.1.2 The Region shares an interest in the protection and conservation of significant built heritage resources and encourages local municipalities to develop policies to protect and conserve locally significant built heritage resources and to utilize its authority under the Ontario Heritage Act to designate individual properties, cultural heritage landscapes and heritage conservation districts that are of cultural heritage value or interest.

Policy 10.C.2.1.3 Municipalities are encouraged to establish a Municipal Heritage Committee (MHC) to advise and assist Council on matters related to Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act. Local Councils may expand the role of this committee to advise and assist Local Councils on other matters of cultural heritage conservation.

Policy 10.C.2.1.4 Public works projects and plans undertaken or reviewed by the Region, where in the vicinity of significant built and/ or cultural heritage landscapes will be designed in a sensitive manner and will provide appropriate mitigation measures in both design and location to conserve, enhance and complement the existing significant built and/ or cultural heritage resources.

9 Page 33 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

Policy 10.C.2.1.5 Where development, site alteration and/ or a public works project is proposed on or adjacent to a significant built heritage resource(s) or cultural heritage landscapes , a heritage impact assessment will be required. The findings of the assessment shall include recommendations for design alternatives and satisfactory measures to mitigate any negative impacts on identified significant heritage resources.

Policy 10.C.2.1.6 The Region encourages local municipalities to establish Cultural Heritage Landscapes policies in their official plans and identify Significant Cultural Heritage Landscapes for designation. The purpose of this designation is to conserve groupings of features (buildings, structures, spaces, archaeological sites and natural elements) with heritage attributes that, together form a significant type of heritage form, distinctive from that of its constituent elements or parts.

Policy 10.C.2.1.7 The local municipalities shall adopt official plan policies to conserve significant cultural heritage resources and ensure that development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected properties will conserve the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property.

Policy 10.C.2.1.8 The Region will assist local municipalities with the preparation of Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation Plans for Significant Cultural Heritage Landscapes that cross municipal boundaries or are of Regional interest.

Policy 10.C.2.1.9 The Region, in collaboration with local municipalities, will prepare and maintain a Regional Implementation Guideline for Significant Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation.

3.3 TOWN OF GRIMSBY OFFICAL PLAN

The following provisions are from the Town of Grimsby Official Plan and pertains to Cultural Heritage.

8.0 CULTURAL HERITAGE AND ARCHAEOLOGY

8.18 Development and site alteration may be permitted on in the vicinity of protected heritage property where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.

Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches may be required in order to conserve the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property affected by the adjacent development or site alteration.

10 Page 34 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

4.0 PROPERTY CONTEXT

4.1 Property Location The subject site is located at 104 Main Street East which can be seen in Figure 1 below highlighted in yellow. The property is situated along the Historic Main Street Corridor in front of Centennial Park.

FIGURE 1: The subject site at 104 Main Street East, Grimsby, Ontario as indicated by the blue outline. Source: Mitown

11 Page 35 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

4.2 Property Context

The historic property is located along the Main Street historic corridor. This historic corridor is illustrated below based on the following contextual attributes:

The historic Main Street corridor is a council identified significant Cultural Heritage Landscape identified in 2015. The Main Street East District is of cultural heritage value as an intact historic 19th and early 20th Century agricultural landscape of the tender fruit farming industry. Situated midway between the Escarpment and , Farms stretched both north and south. The shape of the farms was generally long and narrow as a result of landscape features and the original survey pattern. This resulted in Farm dwellings being situated in relatively close proximity forming a near urban environment. The Quality and scale of the Architecture on this stretch of Main Street is testament to the prosperity of the tender fruit farming industry and the fertility of the land. The construction date of most of the houses is in the late 1800s and early 1900s an indication of the prosperity that came with the arrival of the Hamilton Grimsby and Beamsville Electric Railway in 1894. A defining feature of the landscape are the distinctive fruit barns. Many of the original fruit barns still survive to this day, located just to the rear of the houses. A landmark of the area is the Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates. A memorial to the local men and women who fell in the First World War. The gate is constructed of local red limestone. It is a reminder of the significance of the conflict on the community which saw many local families impacted.

Description of Heritage Attributes

Key attributes of the Main Street East District that reflect its value as an important link to the history of Grimsby include:

1. 19th and early 20th Century Residential Architecture 2. Mature Trees 3. Fruit Barns 4. Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates 5. Centennial Park (1967) view to the escarpment 6. Backdrop view towards the

The property at 104 Main Street E contributes to the following of the above mentioned attributes of the historic Main Street Cultural Heritage Landscape. This property contributes to the 19th and early 20th century residential architectural style that is historically found along this corridor. Many of the mature trees stand tall framing this historic home. This property is situated down the road from the Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates, however; this dwelling does not contribute to this attribute. The parcel of land that this historic home is siting on was originally a part of the original land parcel which had included Centennial Park and several parcels throughout Main Street. This historic home is framed on both sides by the Niagara Escarpment.

12 Page 36 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

5.0 SITE ANALYSIS

5.1 Site Development:

FIGURE 2: 1876 Atlas

Year Event

Around 1600s Land was inhabited by Neutral Peoples

1876 Atlas shows the property at concession 2 Lot 7 owned by Mrs. Racy & Mrs. Farris 1

1885 Dennis Van Duzer constructs brick Italianate structure on property.

1912 Dennis’s son George farmed the land until his death in 1912. The farm was purchased by Tennyson Jarvis, a professor of entomology and plant pathology. After Tennyson retired his son Herb farmed the property.

1956 The property was purchased by Rena and Bruce Goddard

1967 During the Centennial year the committee purchased 25 acres from the Goddards for Centennial Park. Goddards sold property to the Mauros and severed a lot to build a smaller, modern home for themselves by the creek.

1976 Grimsby Resident and Recreation and Park Department Employee find Neutral People Burial Ground from late 1600s2

1 1876 Lincoln & Welland Atlas 2 People and Places from Grimsby’s Past – Van Dusen

13 Page 37 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

5.2 Existing Condition

The site currently consists of the following structures:

1. Historic two storey dwelling with attached garage.

The site currently consists of the following landscaping:

2. Driveway 3. Landscape with gardens and trees

5.3 Elevations of Site

FIGURE 3 & 4: Depicted above and below are the elevations of 104 Main St E

14 Page 38 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

FIGURE 5 & 6: Depicted above and below are the elevations of 104 Main St E

15 Page 39 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

6.0 HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY

HISTORY: 104 Main Street East

FIGURE 7 Historic Photograph of 104 Main St E Source: unknown

The property of 104 Main Street East is a smaller portion of the original land which had included Centennial Park and a neighboring property that was severed by the Goffards family in the 1960s. During the 1960s when the large lot was severed 25 acres were sold to the Town for the construction of a park during the Centennial. In the late 1970s a resident and Town employee discovered an ancient burial ground, the original site was to the west of Centennial Park. During the process of relocation of the burial site the Neutral Peoples were moved into Centennial Park for further preservation. We can speculate that this large parcel of land was inhabited by the Neutral Peoples for years before their extinction in the late 1650s.

HISTORY: Neutral People

The Neutral Peoples once occupied the land from Lake Erie to Lake Ontario and during the Iroquois and Huron wars, the Neutrals sold their spear pointers and flint arrowheads to both sides which in exchange gave them their name we know today as the Neutrals. Once the Iroquois had overtaken the Hurons they turned on the Neutrals. It is believed that the connection the Neutrals had developed with the French intimidated the Hurons, in retaliation the Huron’s started rumors about the French. These rumors forced the Neutrals to break ties and allowed the Hurons to move in and exclusively trade directly with the French and other European countries. Thus, the artifacts found were most likely traded to the Neutrals by the Huron and Iroquois People. Although the Huron’s had rumored the dangers of the French it had come full circle as the Europeans had brought

16 Page 40 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East many vicious influenzas and disease with them to Canada. In 1650, unfortunately after combating famine, war and disease, the Neutral people were wiped out entirely.

FIGURE 3: The Northern Iroquoian-speaking peoples. Source: The Grimsby Site- A Historical Neutral Cemetery -ROM

HISTORY: Neutral People Burial Ground

In 1876, a Grimsby resident and Town employee, discovered six copper kettles, seven French felling axes, a conch shell, two pendants made from a conch, a human skull, and bone fragments near Grimsby’s Centennial Park. The resident knew he had found a ritual burial ground. The resident and municipal employee reported news of the findings to the local museum who directed them to contact the Royal Ontario Museum. The next day the archival team arrived. Walter Kenyon, lead archaeologist and curator at the ROM led the project. The dig at the Grimsby site went on for over six months, and over 300 remains of Neutral People were discovered. During the dig over 62 graves were uncovered along with hundreds of significant artifacts.3

FIGURE 4: Burial Test Pits in Grimsby Source: Some Bones of Contention – Rom

3 Who were the Neutral People – canadianheritagematters.weebly.com

17 Page 41 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

FIGURE 5: Projectile Points, from Grave 10 Source: The Grimsby Site- A Historical Neutral Cemetery –ROM

Burial Traditions

The Neutral people had very specific burial traditions; the below mentioned traditions are based on articles published in the late 1970s about the ancient burial ground in Grimsby. It is believed that when someone in the Neutral Tribe would pass away the Tribe would place that person in the family’s long house until the odor had become unbearable they then would move them outside to be naturally unburdened by flesh and then would collect the family member’s bones and place them on display in the long house. The Neutral People would then have feast day every 10-12 years where they would collect the community’s deceased loved ones and place them in a large pit together with cherished possessions that would help them in their afterlife. The articles also mentioned that some of the Neutral tribes would bury the dead twice, during this tradition the loved one would be moved into the larger pit with the community from a temporary single burial pit. 4

FIGURE 6: Pipes from Cemetery Site, from Grave 10 Source: The Grimsby Site- A Historical Neutral Cemetery -ROM

4 News article from Grimsby Independent – Grimsby Archives

18 Page 42 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

FIGURE 7: Plaque Located at Centennial Park -2019 Source: Town of Grimsby

FIGURE 9: Landscape in Centennial Park -2019 Source: Town of Grimsby

19 Page 43 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

HISTORY: Van Duzer Family (Dennis Van Duzer – Original Owner)

Early in Grimsby’s settlement John Van Duzer and his family lived just above the escarpment. John was the ancestor of Jacob Van Duzer who came to North America as early as 1621 and lived in New Amsterdam (New York City), Jacob and his family were successful millers and farmers. John was born is 1784 son of Levinius who had settled in Saltfleet and bought a mill on Red Hill creek.

John married Christina the daughter of Peter and Mary Bowslaugh, all of John and Christina’s children grew up in Grimsby in a log cabin on Ridge Road. The Van Duzer home was situated on a beautiful timbered property with many maple trees, this property was often referred to as the Sugar Orchard. John was well known for his maple sugar, maple syrup and hickory nuts. John was also a very big supporter of the Methodist community and was recognized as a local preacher. In 1858 John Van Duzer and Andrew Muir were appointed to find land for a new school which would be known as Always School and would be located on the escarpment, part of their duties included supervision of the completed structure. This little school quickly became the centre of the community for Christmas celebrations and local government voting. The school community moved to a newer building in 1955 and the original building was used as a space for cub and scout meetings, after 39 years the structure had fallen to disrepair and was demolished.

FIGURE 10: 90th Anniversay at Always School in 1948 Source: Grimsby Museum

Dennis Van Duzer son of John and Christina went on to marry Mary Culp and built the brick home 104 Main St. East. Dennis was a well known fruit famer and was the reeve of the North Grimsby Township from 1893 to 1896. Dennis and Mary’s son George continued to farm the land until his death in 1912. Based on the information found at the Land Registry Office in St Catherines, Dennis owned quite a bit of property around 104 Main St East.

20 Page 44 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

HISTORY: Bowslaugh - (Relatives of Dennis Van Duzer – Original Owner)

Peter Bowslaugh came to Grimsby around 1807 and lived on lot 23 and 24 of concession 3 and 4, was a member of the Lutheran Church unit coming to Canada, converted to Methodist and later became a local minister. During his lifetime Peter’s preaching circuit brought him through many miles of wilderness, Peter was recognized in 1861 for his ministerial work. Peter and his cousin John Cline were prominent in Methodist community and went on to run the Ancaster Circuit.

Peter was a member of the Grimsby Township Council from 1808 until 1824, he served his country as 4th Lincoln Regiment in the War of 1812. Peter and His wife had a large family, one of their children being Christina, Christina went on to marry John Van Duzer and had a son named Dennis Van Duzer who owned substantial property on main street and built the home at 104 Main St E. Peter also had a son named Peter Jr., Peter Jr married into the beamer family and built a large homestead on the family farm. Peter was an active member of the municipality being elected almost yearly from 1826 until his death. Peter’s son carried their fathers and grandfathers faith building the stone church on Ridge Road known as Rock Chapel. Peter’s son John inherited land from his maternal grandfather, this was the land John later went on to sever and gave to the Methodist Camp Ground, now known today as Grimsby Beach. Peter’s other son Edward. W was instrumental in the construction of the Grimsby Beach cottages which includes many of the ones we see today in the old camp ground community. 5

HISTORY: Grimsby Beach

The Grimsby Beach area, once known as Grimsby Park or the Methodist Campground, was settled after the Loyalists arrived in Upper Canada, and the area was associated in the 1800s with their religious needs.6 Early settlers did not have permanent churches to gather in, and so, preachers would travel to different towns for meetings. One of the places meeting were held was on John Bowslaugh’s land on the shore of Lake Ontario in Grimsby.

FIGURE 11: Portrait of John Bowslaugh Source: Grimsby Museum

5 People and Places of Grimsby’s Past – Bowslaugh & Annals of the Forty- No. 3- Bowslaugh

21 Page 45 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

These meetings were very well attended, with over 2,000 people in 1846. When it was decided that a permanent location was needed, John Bowslaugh offered his lands for use as a Methodist Temperance meeting grounds.6 The land was cleared shortly after, and tents were erected on campsites to house the visitors.6 Grimsby Beach was Canada’s home to the Chautauqua movement that was popular in the late 1800s and early 1900s. The religious meetings were supplemented with educational and social activities.1

Cottages began to appear on the original campsites in the 1870s, as the park was now open from June until the end of September and tents would no longer suffice.6 The subject cottage can be seen in historical photographs from the heyday of the Chautauqua movement demonstrating the building’s presence during the Chautauqua events along the waterfront.

FIGURE 12: E.W Bowslaugh’s Cottage located in Grimsby Park -1885 Source: Grimsby Museum

The cottages (of which there were originally over 50) are said to have been built by Edward W. Bowslaugh, who owned the nearby Grimsby Planing Mill.6 Typical cottages were 1.5 storeys, with a kitchen and living space on the main floor, and bedrooms on the second.7 They were of simple wooden construction, often with a rectangular footprint and steep gable or half-hip roof. Most cottages included a 1 or 2 storey porch, and had intricate woodwork decoration known as “fretwork” or “gingerbread”.6 Having been built on the original camp lots, these cottages were very close together.6

6 Greetings from Grimsby Park, The Chautauqua of Canada, Dorothy Turcotte and Jean Jarvis, 1985. 7 Once Upon a Little Town…Grimsby: 1876 to 1976 By: Ada Bromley & Jean Powell, Grimsby Historical Society: Rannie Publications, 1979

22 Page 46 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

7.0 ASSESSMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST

A property may be designated under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act if it meets one or more of the following criteria for determining whether it is of cultural heritage value or interest

7.1 The property has design value or physical value because it:

Meets O. Reg. 9/06 Criteria Criteria Summary (Y/N)

1. The property has design value or physical value because it,

i) Is a rare, unique, representative or Yes 104 Main Street East was constructed in 1885, the structure early example of a style, type, was built with fired clay bricks paired with a soft lime based expression, and material or mortar. The structure is sitting on a cut stone foundation, the construction method original foundation is arranged in a coursed layout pattern. The original wood windows have been removed throughout the exterior of 104 Main Street East although many of the original window openings and sills are still preserved. The segmental arches above the windows are constructed with clay bricks and are traced with header bricks above the arch voussoirs. The sills and lintels above and below the window openings are cut stone. This historic home was constructed in the Italianate architectural style. The Italianate architectural style traditionally features a projecting frontispiece with rooflines dressed with decorative eaves, both of these architectural features can be seen on 104 Main St E. The frontispiece features a broken pediment with a lunette window, the roof line follows the gable with cornice returns. The windows throughout the structure feature a curved arch above each of the window opening.

ii) Displays a high degree of No Property does not display a high degree of craftsmanship or craftsmanship or artistic merit artistic merit

iii) Demonstrates a high degree of No Property does not demonstrate a high degree of technical or technical or scientific scientific achievement achievement

7.2 The property has historical value or associative value because it,

2. The property has historical value as of associative value because it,

i) Has direct associations with a theme, Yes This dwelling was originally apart of a much larger piece of event, belief, person, activity, land which had included Centennial Park. In the late 1970’s organization or institution that is an ancient burial ground was accidently discovered thus significant to a community. making this particular parcel of land very significant. With such a discovery the community was able to understand the teachings, beliefs and activities of the community that was inhabiting this land long before the United Empire Loyalists had arrived in the late 1700’s.

ii) Yields, or has the potential to yield, Yes With the discovery of this ancient burial ground the information that contributes to an community has been given a window into history. This understanding of a community or discovery was instrumental in the understanding of the

23 Page 47 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

culture, or Neutral Peoples, their traditions and the land they had once inhabited. Upon discovery of this site, artifacts displayed images of animals that had once roamed this land before their extinction or relocation to other lands. During this archeological dig the community gained extensive knowledge of the Neutral Peoples burial traditions, and helped to depict the size age and gender of these Peoples along with their day to day lifestyles and unique rituals.

iii) Demonstrates or reflects the work or No Property does not demonstrate or reflect the work or ideas of ideas of an architect, artist, an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is builder, designer or theorist who significant to a community is significant to a community.

7.3 The property has contextual value because it,

3. The property has contextual value because it,

i) Is important in defining, maintaining or Yes The dwelling at 104 Main Street East is significant in supporting the character of an supporting the character of Main Street’s Cultural Heritage area, Landscape. The scale, materials, and setbacks of this historic site contributes to style of Ontario farm houses that were historically been found along historic main street corridors.

ii) Is physically, functionally, visually or Yes 104 Main Street East is physically linked to this property, this historically linked to its dwelling helps to demonstrate the size of the original lot surroundings, or which had incorporated Centennial Park.

iii) Is a landmark. No Property is not a landmark.

7.4 CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST

“The statement of cultural heritage value or interest, including a description of the heritage attributes along with all other components of the Heritage Designation Brief constitute the "Reasons for the Designation" required under the Ontario Heritage Act. The Heritage Designation Brief is available for viewing in the Town Planning Department during regular business hours.”

7.5 STATEMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST

104 Main Street East was constructed in 1885, the structure was built with fired clay bricks paired with a soft lime based mortar. The structure is sitting on a cut stone foundation, this original foundation is arranged in a coursed layout. The original wood windows have been removed throughout the exterior of 104 Main Street East although many of the original window openings are still preserved. The arches above the windows are constructed with; clay bricks and are traced with header bricks above the arch voussoirs. The sills and lintels on the windows are cut stone. This historic home was constructed in the Italianate architectural style. The Italianate architectural style traditionally features a projecting frontispiece with rooflines dressed with decorative eaves, both of these architectural features can be seen on 104 Main St E. The frontispiece features a broken pediment with a lunette window, the roof line follows the gable with cornice returns. The windows throughout the structure feature a curved arch above the window opening.

24 Page 48 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

This dwelling was originally apart of a much larger piece of land that had incorporated Centennial Park. This land is significant to the community as in the late 1970’s an accident burial ground was discovered. With such a discovery the community was able to understand the teachings, beliefs and the activity of this community that inhabited long before the United Empire Loyalists arrived in the late 1700’s.

With the discovery of the ancient burial ground the community was given a window into history. The community was able to understand the traditions of the Neutral Peoples that had once inhabited this land. Upon discovery of this site artifacts displayed images of animals that had roamed the land before their extinction or relocated to other lands. During the archeological dig the community gained extensive knowledge of Neutral burial traditions, these burial sites helped to depict the size age and gender of this community along with their day to day lifestyles and significant traditions.

The dwelling at 104 Main Street East is significant in supporting the character of Main Street’s council identified cultural heritage landscape. The scale, materials, and setbacks of this historic site contributes to style of Ontario farm houses that were historically found along historic main street corridors.

104 Main Street East is physically linked to this property, this dwelling helps to demonstrate the size of the original lot which had incorporated Centennial Park.

7.6 HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES TO BE DESIGNATED

The Heritage Attributes to be designated at 104 Main Street East includes:

 Exterior clay brick construction  Original openings  Original doorways  Cut stone sill and lintels  Cut stone foundation  Bracketed Eaves  Roof line, top deck and cornice returns  Stained glass windows  Brick Chimney

8.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

8.1 SUMMARY

The building at 104 Main Street meets the criteria set out in the Ontario Heritage Act for designation under Part IV, Section 29. It therefore is recommended by Town Staff that the subject property be designated under Section 29, Part IV of the Act for the significant value determined in Section 7 of this report. The statement of cultural heritage value or interest contained in Section 7.5. Of this report includes the heritage attributes identified in Section 7.6. These attributes have been determined to merit designation as they contribute to the significance of the building.

25 Page 49 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 104 Main Street East

The limitations of this report are based on missing information from the time this structure was constructed in the late 1800s and documentation in the following years. During the production of this report various information was required and unfortunately based on the age of the structure we were unable to identify all information.

The analysis of this report was completed with the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. During the analysis the following was prepared:

 Description of Property  Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.  Description of Heritage Attributes and  Legal Description

Policy framework has been created to ensure the conservation of heritage sites and architectural attributes. The following policies have been put in place from both the municipal and provincial level. These policies are as follows:

 Provincial Policy Statement  Regional Official Plan  Town of Grimsby Official Plan

8.2 Findings

During the analysis of this report the attributes and the architectural significance of this structure were identified. This historic structure contains many of the original architectural elements from its construction in the late 1800s. The property on which this structure rests was a part of a much larger parcel of land which had originally been a part of Centennial Park. In the 1980s an ancient burial ground was discovered near Centennial Park. Based on the proximity of this house and originally being a part of Centennial Park it is likely that this land would have been inhabited by the neutral peoples. The discovery of this ancient burial ground was instrumental in the understanding of the neutral peoples and the traditional practices that this land was used for. In addition this historic structure contributes to the architectural style, massing and scale that was traditionally found along this streetscape.

During the assessment of cultural heritage value or interest on this particular historic structure it was determined that this building meets 5 of the required criteria to be considered for designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

8.3 Recommendations

Based on the assessment of cultural heritage value or interest staff has recommended that this structure be designated under Part IV, section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

26 Page 50 of 198

HERITAGE RESEARCH 130 Main Street East October REPORT Grimsby, Ontario 2020

Page 51 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

INFORMATION SUMMARY

PROPERTY INFORMATION

Address: 130 Main Street East, Grimsby, ON, L3M 1N8

Roll Number: 261502001717400

Short Legal PT LT 7 CON 2, North Grimsby (FMLY PCL 26), as in Description: RO199164 ; GRIMSBY

Heritage Status: Listed Heritage Property

Name of Heritage Danish Lutheran Church Item: OWNER INFORMATION

Names of Owners: 1245790 ONTARIO INC

Owners Address: 41 ELEVENTH RD E STONEY CREEK, ON, CAN, L8J3N2

REPORT INFORMATION

Report Purpose: Provide an evaluation of the potential cultural heritage value or interest of the property and provide recommendations on the actions for conservation.

Date: October 2020

Designation Brief Completed by: Bianca Verrecchia, Assistant Heritage Planner

- Heritage Conservation Diploma– Williowbank School of Restoration Arts 2019 - Architectural Technologist Advanced Diploma – Mohawk College 2014

Antonietta Minichillo, MES, RPP, CAHP, Director of Planning, Building & By-Law

- Undergrad York University Geography and Urban

Studies

- Masters in Environmental Studies, Planning Stream,

York University

- Masters Thesis: The Economics of Heritage

Preservation: A Case Study on the John Street

Roundhouse

2 Page 52 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

Janice Hogg, MCIP, RPP, Senior Planner

- Bachelor of Environmental Studies, Honors Planning –

University of Waterloo 2005

- Masters of Heritage Conservation – University of Sydney

2009

References: Grimsby Historical Society, Designation Report – Nelles Manor, People and Places from Grimsby’s Past,Journal of the Executive Proceedings of the Senate of the United, Volume 12, Medical and Surgical Reporter, Volume 19 Page 488, Ancestry.ca – Woolverton Family tree, Medical Record Volume 37, Death Notices- Grimsby Independent -Francis Woolverton (Grimsby Public Library), Ancestry.ca – Woolverton Family tree, Annals of the Forty: No. 9 –Pg 76, Designation Report – 354 Main St W (Maple Hurst), Grimsby Museum, Dictionary of Architects in Canada, The Buildings of Canada, Raftertales.com

3 Page 53 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

1. INTRODUCTION

This report was prepared to assess the building at 130 Main Street East against the criteria for the Ontario Heritage Act for designation under Section 29, Part IV of the Act. Research was undertaken by consulting primary and secondary sources and site visits were undertaken to evaluate the dwelling and take photographs. Currently, this building is the site of Green Belt Academy located along the historic Main Street corridor which Council has identified as a cultural heritage landscape (CHL). Research was conducted in the winter of 2018 and was completed by Town Staff.

1.1 REPORT LIMITATIONS

The limitations of this report are based on missing information from the time this structure was constructed in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s. During the research phase of this report several resources were used, these included: the Grimsby Historical Society Collection, Our Ontario, Ancestry, Land Registry Record on Microfilms, Annals at the Forty (produced by the historical society in 1955), Peoples & Places from Grimsby’s Past by Dorothy Turcotte, and Once upon a Little Town by Grimsby Historical Society. During the production of this report various information was required and unfortunately based on the age of the structure and the lack of documentation over the last hundred plus years we were unable to identify all information.

Note: There was no structural evaluation conducted and all analysis was completed based on observation from the public realm. There was only an exterior analysis.

2.0 STUDY APPROACH

The analysis of this report was completed with the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. During the analysis the following was prepared:

1. Description of Property 2. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest. 3. Description of Heritage Attributes and 4. Legal Description

2.1 DEFINITIONS & ABBREVATIONS

2.2.1 Abbreviations

CHL- Cultural Heritage Landscape

GPS- Global Positioning System

HG&B- Hamilton Grimsby and Beamsville Electric Railway

ICOMOS- International Council on Monuments and Sites

LPAT- Local Planning Appeal Tribunal

MHR- Municipal Heritage Register

4 Page 54 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

MHSTCI- Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries

NHSC- National Historic Site of Canada

NTS- National Topographic Systems

OBC- Ontario Building Code

OHA- Ontario Heritage Act

OP- Official Plan

O. Reg 9/06 – Ontario Regulation 9/06- Criteria for determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.

Section 29- Part IV- Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act is the designation of a heritage property.

Section 29- Part V- Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act is the designation of a heritage conservation district.

ZBL- Zoning Bylaw

2.2.2 Definitions

Adaptation: Modification of a heritage item to suit a proposed, compatible use.

Alter: “alter” means to change in any manner and includes to restore, renovate, repair or disturb and “alteration” has a corresponding meaning; (“transformer”, “transformation”)

Archaeology: A set of theories, methods and techniques for the study of human culture and civilization, using scientific investigation of physical remains of past activities. Archaeological Resource: All tangible evidence of human activity that is of historical, cultural or scientific interest. Examples include features, structures, archaeological objects or remains at or from an archaeological site, or an object recorded as an isolated archaeological find.

Archaeological Sites: A place or area where tangible evidence of human activity of historical, cultural or scientific interest is or was located on, above or below the ground, whether submerged or not. The identification, recovery and interpretation of this evidence can be carried out using archaeological research methods.

Artefacts: Any object manufactured, used, moved or otherwise modified by human beings, including all waste materials and by-products of these processes.

Attribute: A property or quality of any archaeological object such as the length of a projectile point, the hardness of a potsherd or the colour of a bottle fragment.

5 Page 55 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

Built Heritage Resources: a building, structure, monument, installation or any manufactured remnant that contributes to a property's cultural heritage value or interest as identified by a community, including an Aboriginal Indigenous community. Built heritage resources are generally located on property that has been designated under Parts lV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act, or included on local, provincial and/or federal registers.

Character-defining elements: The materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings that contribute to the heritage value of a historic place, and which must be retained in order to preserve its heritage value.

Construction date: The date of construction of the historic place (may be approximate).

Conservation: All actions or processes that are aimed at safeguarding the fundamental characteristics of a cultural resource in order to preserve its heritage value and extend its physical life. This may involve “preservation,” “rehabilitation,” “restoration” or a combination of these actions or processes.

Consultation: The term public consultation refers to the two-way process of providing and seeking information and advice from the general public, governments, Aboriginal peoples, interest groups and others on the management of protected heritage places. Consultation is only one of the many aspects of the overall public engagement.

Culture: The concept of culture can be defined as the “set of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual and emotional features of society or a social group” encompassing,“ in addition to art and literature, lifestyles, ways of living together, value systems, traditions and beliefs.”

Cultural Heritage Landscapes; a defined geographical area that may have been modified by human activity and is identified as having cultural heritage value or interest by a community, including an Aboriginal indigenous community. The area may involve features such as structures, spaces, archaeological sites or natural elements that are valued together for their interrelationship, meaning or association. Examples may include, but are not limited to, heritage conservation districts designated under the Ontario Heritage Act; villages, parks, gardens, battlefields, main streets and neighbourhoods, cemeteries, trail ways, view sheds, natural areas and industrial complexes of heritage significance; and areas recognized by federal or international designation authorities (e.g. a National Historic Site or District designation, or a UNESCO World Heritage Site).

Demolition: The damaging, defacing, destroying or dismantling of a heritage item or a component of a heritage conservation area, in whole or in part.

Façade: The face of a building; an architectural drawing of the vertical projection of the face of a building.

Guidelines: Statements that provide practical guidance in applying the Standards for the conservation of historic places. They are presented here in a format that provides recommended and non-recommend actions.

6 Page 56 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

Heritage Attribute: “heritage attributes” means, in relation to real property, and to the buildings and structures on the real property, the attributes of the property, buildings and structures that contribute to their cultural heritage value or interest

Heritage Fabric: All the physical material of an item, including surroundings and contents which contribute to its heritage significance.

Historic Place: A structure, building, group of buildings, district, landscape, archaeological site or other place in Canada that has been formally recognized for its heritage value by an appropriate authority within a jurisdiction.

Heritage Resource: A Heritage Area or any natural or cultural features associated with heritage areas or potential Areas.

Historical Value: The aesthetic, historic, scientific, cultural, social or spiritual importance or significance for past, present or future generations. The heritage value of a historic place is embodied in its character-defining materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings.

Inspect: “inspect” includes to survey, photograph, measure and record

Microfilm: A length of film containing microphotographs of documents.

Owner: means the person registered on title in the proper land registry office as owner.

Place: A site, area or landscape or group of works, together with associated structures, contents and surrounds.

Preservation: The action or process of protecting, maintaining and/or stabilizing the existing materials, form and integrity of a historic place, or of an individual component, while protecting its heritage value.

Protected Heritage Property: property designated under Parts lV, V or Vl of the Ontario Heritage Act; property subject to a heritage conservation easement under Parts ll or lV of the Ontario Heritage Act; property identified by the Province and prescribed public bodies as provincial heritage property under the Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties; property protected under federal legislation, and UNESCO World Heritage Sites.

Rarity: An item having this value is significant because it represents a rare, endangered or unusual aspect of our history or cultural heritage.

Reconstruction: Returning a place as nearly as possible to a known earlier state by the introduction of new or old materials into the fabric.

Rehabilitation: The action or process of making possible a continuing or compatible contemporary use for a historic place, or of an individual component, through repair, alterations and/or additions, while protecting its heritage value.

7 Page 57 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

Restoration: The action or process of accurately revealing, recovering or representing the state of a historic place, or of an individual component, as it appeared at a particular period in its history, while protecting its heritage value.

Tribunal: means the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal

2.2 METHODOLOGY

This report follows a three-step approach to understanding and planning for cultural heritage resources:

•Understanding the heritage planning regulatory framework;

•Understanding the significance of heritage resource (known and potential); and,

•Understanding the existing conditions of the property.

This is consistent with the recommended methodology outlined by the Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries (MHSTCI) within its 2006 publication Heritage Property Evaluation. The MHSTCI identifies three key steps: Historical Research, Site Analysis, and Evaluation. This was augmented with a policy analysis to outline the provincial and local policy contexts.

2.3 LEGISLATIVE POLICY

In the Province of Ontario, the process for determining cultural heritage value is prescribed via O. Reg. 9/06 of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). Further, in order to better understand the local context for evaluation of cultural heritage value or interest under the OHA, it must be determined if there are any supplemental municipal approaches or priorities that augment the provincially established process. For example, a municipality can build on the criteria of O.Reg. 9/06 by using adopted thematic history; identifying specific views in its Official Plan; or by adopting an evaluative template. The legislative and policy framework for this report is presented in Section 3 below.

3.0 POLICY FRAMEWORK

Policy framework has been created to ensure the conservation of heritage sites and architectural attributes. The following policies have been put in place from both the municipal and provincial level. These policies are as follows:

1. Provincial Policy Statement 2. Regional Official Plan 3. Town of Grimsby Official Plan 4. Growth Plan For The Greater Golden Horseshoe 5. Escarpment Plan 6. Council Identified Cultural Heritage Landscapes

8 Page 58 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

3.1 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT

The following provisions are from the Provincial Policy Statement and pertains to Cultural Heritage.

2.6 Cultural heritage and archaeology

2.6.1 Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved.

2.6.3 Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.

2.6.5 Planning authorities shall engage with Indigenous communities and consider their interests when identifying, protecting and managing cultural heritage and archaeological resources.

3.2 REGIONAL OFFICAL PLAN

The following provisions are from the Regional Official Plan and pertains to Cultural Heritage.

10. C.2 Policies

Policy 10. C.2.1 -Built Heritage Resources, Cultural Heritage Landscapes and Archaeological Resources

Policy 10.C.2.1.1 Significant built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved using the provisions of the Heritage Act, the Planning Act, the Environmental Assessment Act, the Funeral, Burial and Cremations Act and the Municipal Act.

Policy 10.C.2.1.2 The Region shares an interest in the protection and conservation of significant built heritage resources and encourages local municipalities to develop policies to protect and conserve locally significant built heritage resources and to utilize its authority under the Ontario Heritage Act to designate individual properties, cultural heritage landscapes and heritage conservation districts that are of cultural heritage value or interest.

Policy 10.C.2.1.3 Municipalities are encouraged to establish a Municipal Heritage Committee (MHC) to advise and assist Council on matters related to Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act. Local Councils may expand the role of this committee to advise and assist Local Councils on other matters of cultural heritage conservation.

Policy 10.C.2.1.4 Public works projects and plans undertaken or reviewed by the Region, where in the vicinity of significant built and/ or cultural heritage landscapes will be designed in a sensitive manner and will provide appropriate

9 Page 59 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

mitigation measures in both design and location to conserve, enhance and complement the existing significant built and/ or cultural heritage resources.

Policy 10.C.2.1.5 Where development, site alteration and/ or a public works project is proposed on or adjacent to a significant built heritage resource(s) or cultural heritage landscapes , a heritage impact assessment will be required. The findings of the assessment shall include recommendations for design alternatives and satisfactory measures to mitigate any negative impacts on identified significant heritage resources.

Policy 10.C.2.1.6 The Region encourages local municipalities to establish Cultural Heritage Landscapes policies in their official plans and identify Significant Cultural Heritage Landscapes for designation. The purpose of this designation is to conserve groupings of features (buildings, structures, spaces, archaeological sites and natural elements) with heritage attributes that, together form a significant type of heritage form, distinctive from that of its constituent elements or parts.

Policy 10.C.2.1.7 The local municipalities shall adopt official plan policies to conserve significant cultural heritage resources and ensure that development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected properties will conserve the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property.

Policy 10.C.2.1.8 The Region will assist local municipalities with the preparation of Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation Plans for Significant Cultural Heritage Landscapes that cross municipal boundaries or are of Regional interest.

Policy 10.C.2.1.9 The Region, in collaboration with local municipalities, will prepare and maintain a Regional Implementation Guideline for Significant Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation.

3.3 TOWN OF GRIMSBY OFFICAL PLAN

The following provisions are from the Town of Grimsby Official Plan and pertains to Cultural Heritage.

8.0 CULTURAL HERITAGE AND ARCHAEOLOGY

8.18 Development and site alteration may be permitted on in the vicinity of protected heritage property where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.

Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches may be required in order to conserve the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property affected by the adjacent development or site alteration.

10 Page 60 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

4.0 PROPERTY CONTEXT

4.1 Property Location

The subject site is located at 130 Main Street E which can be seen in Figure 1 below highlighted in yellow. The property is situated near the intersection of Main Street East and Nelles Road S.

FIGURE 1: The subject site at 130 Main Street E, Grimsby, Ontario as indicated by the blue outline. Source: Mitown.

4.2 Property Context

The historic property is located along the Main Street historic corridor. This historic corridor is illustrated below based on the following contextual attributes:

The historic Main Street corridor is a council identified significant cultural heritage landscape which was identified in 2015. The Main Street East District is of cultural heritage value as an intact historic 19th and early 20th Century agricultural landscape of the tender fruit farming industry. Situated midway between the Escarpment and Lake Ontario, Farms stretched both north and south. The shape of the farms was generally long and narrow as a result of landscape features and the original survey pattern. This resulted in farm dwellings being situated in relatively close proximity forming a near urban environment. The quality and scale of the architecture on this stretch of Main Street is testament to the prosperity of the tender fruit farming industry and the fertility of the land. The construction date of most of the houses is in the late 1800s and early 1900s an indication of the prosperity that came with the arrival of the Hamilton Grimsby and Beamsville Electric Railway in 1894. A defining feature of the landscape are the

11 Page 61 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East distinctive fruit barns. Many of the original fruit barns still survive to this day, located just to the rear of the houses. A landmark of the area is the Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates. A memorial to the local men and women who fell in the First World War. The gate is constructed of local red limestone. It is a reminder of the significance of the conflict on the community which saw many local families impacted.

Description of Heritage Attributes

Key attributes of the Main Street East District that reflect its value as an important link to the history of Grimsby include:

1. 19th and early 20th Century Residential Architecture 2. Mature Trees 3. Fruit Barns 4. Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates 5. Centennial Park (1967) view to the escarpment 6. Backdrop view towards the Niagara Escarpment

The property at 130 Main Street E contributes to the following of the above mentioned attributes of the historic Main Street Cultural Heritage Landscape. This property contributes to the 19th and early 20th century residential architectural style that is historically found along this corridor. This property is situated on a large sized property with a backdrop of the escarpment framing the historic dwelling. The property is covered by a lush canopy with a variety of large mature trees. However the Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates, Centennial Park (view of escarpment) and backdrop view towards the Niagara Escarpment does not apply to this site thus this property is not contributing to the significance of these particular attributes.

12 Page 62 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

5.0 SITE ANALYSIS

5.1 Site Development:

The home at 130 Main St E was originally part of a farm estate, having stables and a barn in the rear. The Nelles family owned the home until the early 1900s, when it was bought by the Kennedy Family, who then sold it in the 1960s to Harold Jarvis, a local realtor. In 1969 the home was bought by several members of the Danish community, who then turned it into a church. At this point, an addition was added to the rear of the building to allow room for the altar and the interior was renovated by removing the original main staircase, so that the second floor could be used as an apartment for the pastor. The home was designed by architect James Balfour, who studied in Scotland and worked in New York, before opening his own firm in Hamilton, Ontario. His more notable buildings include; the original Hamilton City Hall, The Detroit Institute of Fine Arts, and Tuckett Mansion (Hamilton).1

FIGURE 2: Danish Lutheran Church Year Event

Around The home at 130 Main St E was constructed by Walter Henry Nelles. The home was originally part 1880 of a Farm Estate with stables and a barn in the rear

Early 1900s Home was sold to the Kennedy Family

1960’s Home was sold to local realtor Harold Jarvis

1969 Home was bought by several members of the Danish Community and turned into a church

201? Home was sold by the Danish Church

1 Grimsby Historical Archives, Accessed January 23, 2018

13 Page 63 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

5.2 Existing Condition

The site currently consists of the following structures:

1. Historic two storey dwelling

The site currently consists of the following landscaping:

2. Driveway 3. Landscaped with gardens and trees

5.3 Elevations of Site

FIGURE 3: Pictured above is 130 Main Street East, Grimsby Ontario. The home at 130 Main Street East features Italianate influences, these influences include wide cornice brackets, quoin brick details, double doors, paired hooded windows, bay windows, triple windows, a bull’s eye window and a hipped roof with flat deck top. The windows are dressed with segmental arches with a contrasting key stone and matching tooled sill. The structure is sitting on a cut stone foundation, the stone is a red local quarried limestone bonded by a lime based mortar. The home is finished with a porch that spans the length of the façade, the porch is enhanced by a portico over the main entrance.

Source: Royal Lepage

14 Page 64 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

Cornice, Quoins & Corbels

FIGURE 4: Pictured above is the original wide wood cornice, the cornice has strong influences from the Italianate architectural style. Cornices in Italianate style are wide and usually feature detailed corbels (brackets) and dentil details.

Windows

Bull’s Eye Window

Bay Window

FIGURE 5: Pictured above are the original wood windows found throughout the exterior of 130 Main Street. The sills below the windows are cut stone with tooling details. The style of windows above include a pair of hooded windows, bay windows, triple hung windows, a bull’s eye window and smaller sash windows throughout.

15 Page 65 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

Solid Masonry Construction

FIGURE 6: The image above shows evidence of solid masonry construction as a brick header row is shown above. The brick header indicates a second row of bricks behind the exterior row, the header acts as a brick tie between the two sister walls. A soft mortar would have been used to compliment the kiln fired clay bricks in a light contrasting color.

Foundation

FIGURE 7: 130 Main Street East is a clay brick structure built on a stone foundation. The original foundation was arranged in a coursed layout with local red cut lime stone bonded with a lime based mortar. The foundation mortar shown above has a beaded mortar joint. The face of the cut stone was left with a quarried finish.

16 Page 66 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

Porch

FIGURE 8 & 9: The home is characterized by a porch that spans the length of the façade, the porch is enhanced by a portico over the main entrance. The roofline of the porch is dressed with dentil details.

17 Page 67 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

Elevations

FIGURE 10: South Elevation Source: Royal Lepage

18 Page 68 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

FIGURE 11: East Elevation Source: Royal Lepage

19 Page 69 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

FIGURE 12: Source: North Elevation Royal Lepage

S o u FIGURE 13: West Elevation Source: Royal Lepage

6.0 HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY

6.1 History: Nelles Family (Relatives of Original Owner – Walter Henry Nelles)

The dwelling on 130 Main Street was built in the mid 19th century circa 1880 by Walter Henry Nelles, the home sits along a road named after the Nelles family. The Nelles family is one of the most successful families in Grimsby’s history. Walter Henry Nelles was the great nephew of Robert Nelles. Robert Nelles took up permanent residence at the forty in 1787, he served as Township warden from 1791 to 1802. In 1803 he was elected a member of parliament and prior to this was appointed Justice of the Peace. In 1794, he was commissioned as an officer in the 4th Lincoln Militia and by the end of the war of 1812 was the commanding officer of the 4th Lincoln Regiment having served in all the important battles at the frontier. Colonel Nelles also served during the Mackenzie rebellion and the Finnian Raids. Colonel Nelles amassed a great deal of property at the forty, two acres of which he deeded to the church of England where St. Andrew’s Church and the cemetery now stand, he also owned one sawmill, one store and 3 homes including Nelles Manor. 2

2 Designation Report – Nelles Manor

20 Page 70 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

FIGURE 14: Nelles Family. Source: Grimsby Museum

6.2 History: Woolverton Family (Relatives of Original Owner – Walter Henry Nelles)

Walter Henry Nelles was the brother-in-law of Theoron Woolverton, Theoron was the son of Dr. Jonathan Woolverton, one of the pioneer physicians of the district. Edgar Judson Woolverton was one of the most widely known and highly respected fruit men of Canada, Brother of Theoron Woolverton.3

3 People and Places From Grimsby’s Past

21 Page 71 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

FIGURE 15: Dr. Theoron and his siblings. Source: Peoples and Places of Grimsby’s Past. Pg. 80

Once Theoron became knowledgeable in both Latin and elements of Greek he began to practice medicine with his father. Once the Civil war had broken out Theoron entered into the service as an assistant surgeon being nominated by The President of the United States (Abraham Lincoln)4. Once the war had commenced Theoron continued to practice in the United States. In 1868 Theoron was promoted from assistant to Navy surgeon.5

4 Journal of the Executive Proceedings of the Senate of the United ..., Volume 12 5 Medical and Surgical Reporter, Volume 19 Page 488

22 Page 72 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

FIGURE 16: Dr. Jonathan Woolverton with his sons. Source: Once Upon a Little Town. Grimsby 1876-1976 Pg. 252 In 1869 Theoron married Oliva Nelles (sister of Walter Henry Nelles) at St Andrews in Grimsby and had two children, Mary Mahan Woolverton (Nina) in 1871 and Francis Theoron Woolverton in 18756. In 1890 Theoron Woolverton was appointed delegate at the American Medical association convention7. After retiring and splitting time between Florida and Grimsby8, Dr. Theoron Woolverton the Medical director of the United States Navy passed away on October 23rd 1912 in Ontario, Canada.9 Theoron was the nephew of Grimsby’s Charles Woolverton born in 1820, son of Dennis Woolverton, reformer in politics and a member of the Upper Canada’s legislative assembly from 1834-1836. Father of Linus Woolverton a successful journalist as well as farmer and fruit raiser with many honourable appointments and achievements. Charles was educated locally and studied horticulture at the University of Toronto.10 C Woolverton married D. Bennet in 1850 and built Echo Hall located at 366 Main Street East. Charles took over the farm from his father and became a leading agriculturalist in Grimsby Township, planting one of the first peach orchards in the area and supplied trees to area farmers from an extensive nursery on his property.11 The earliest mentions of apple propagation in this area come to us from the diary of Charles Woolverton of

6 Ancestry.ca – Woolverton Family tree 7 Medical Record Volume 37 8 Death Notices- Grimsby Independent -Francis Woolverton (Grimsby Public Library) 9 Ancestry.ca – Woolverton Family tree 10 Annals Of The Forty: No. 9 –Pg 76 11 Designation Report – 354 Main St W (Maple Hurst)

23 Page 73 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

Grimsby Township. In this Diary Charles mentions the 200 aches of land purchased by his grandfather for 50 euro NY currency in 1796, included five natural apple trees and one spotted cow for good measure. 12

FIGURE 17: Woolverton Brothers Top row, left to right: Solon Woolverton, Delos Woolverton & Bottom row, left to right: Edgar Woolverton, Theoron Woolverton, Algernon Woolverton. Source: Grimsby Museum

12 Grimsby Museum

24 Page 74 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

6.3 History: Kennedy Family (Relatives of Owner – Kennedy Family)

The Kennedy family came to Grimsby from Scotland and Ireland and moved to America before coming to Canada. The Kennedy family settled in Grimsby and surrounding areas. Members of the Kennedy family participated and contributed to the military services during the war of 1812 under the 4th Lincoln. Kennedy Road in Grimsby is named after the family as they owned the farm at the corner of Main Street East and Nelles Road (130 Main Street East) when the land was subdivided.

FIGURE 18: Pictured above is 130 Main Street East with the Danish Lutheran Church sign outside in 2011. (source: Google Maps)

6.4 History: Danish Lutheran Church (Owner of the Property – Danish Lutheran Church)

In 1969 the Danish Lutheran Church purchased the property at 130 Main St East, the Danish Church bought the house from Harold Jarvis, Harold was a local real estate agent in Grimsby. The Danish Lutheran Church community was very much dedicated to maintaining the property and enjoyed the natural beauty of the heritage structure, and continuing to use the home as a residence. At this point, an addition was added to the rear of the building to allow room for an altar, and the interior was renovated by removing the original main staircase so that the second floor could be used as an apartment for the pastor.

25 Page 75 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

6.5 History: James Balfour (Architect)

James Balfour was a successful architect from Hamilton, Balfour created beautiful buildings for over two decades during the 1800’s. Balfour’s work can be spotted throughout Hamilton, James loved Italianate architecture and incorporated signature features of the Italianate style. From residential to government buildings Balfour’s work filled the streets of Hamilton, many of those structures remaining today. These structures were dressed from roof to foundation with elaborate stone carvings, stone tooling, wood carvings, large cornices, eave brackets, detailed dormers, wood windows and elaborate entrances. James won numerous architectural awards for his most significant structures which included: Alma College (St Thomas), the old City of Hamilton, the Detroit Institute of Fine arts, St Thomas Post Office and Oxford Country Court House. 13 James Balfour was recognized as the architect associated with the design at 130 Main St E in Grimsby. 14

Source: teamsmulders.com Source: Point2homes teamsmulders,com

Source: teamsmulders.com Source: Archiseek

FIGURE 19: Photographs of James Balfour’s Architectural achievements in Hamilton, three of which are still standing today.

13 Dictionary of Architects in Canada 14 Grimsby Archives – Accessed January 23, 2018

26 Page 76 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

6.6 Architectural Styles & Influence: (Italianate Architecture) 7.0 ASSESSMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST

A property may be designated under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act if it meets one or more of the following criteria for determining whether it is of cultural heritage value or interest

7.1 The property has design value or physical value because it:

Meets O. Reg. 9/06 Criteria Criteria Summary (Y/N)

1. The property has design value or physical value because it,

i) Is a rare, unique, representative or Yes The home at 130 Main Street East is an Italianate early example of a style, type, residence. The Italianate influences can be seen in the expression, and material or wide cornice brackets, quoin brick details, double doors, construction method paired hooded windows, bay windows, triple windows, a bull’s eye window and a hipped roof with flat deck top. The windows are dressed with segmental arches with a contrasting key stone and matching tooled sill. The red clay brick structure is sitting on a cut stone foundation, the stone is a red local quarried limestone supported by a lime based mortar. The home is finished with a porch that spans the length of the façade, the porch is enhanced by a portico over the main entrance.

ii) Displays a high degree of Yes The historic dwelling displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit craftsmanship and artistic merit. The Italianate style dwelling is ornately crafted with stone carved keystones, carved corbels, decorative brick coins, bay windows, decorative frieze and elaborate frontispiece. The historic home is a true testament to the traditional craftspeople of the past generations. iii) Demonstrates a high degree of No Property does not demonstrate a high degree of technical technical or scientific or scientific achievement achievement

7.2 The property has historical value or associative value because it,

2. The property has historical value as of associative value because it,

i) Has direct associations with a theme, Yes The dwelling on 130 Main Street East was built in the mid event, belief, person, activity, 19th century circa 1880 by Walter Henry Nelles, the home organization or institution that is sits along a road named after the Nelles family. The Nelles significant to a community. family is one of the most well-known families in Grimsby’s history. Walter was the great nephew of Robert Nelles. Walter Henry Nelles was the brother-in-law of Theoron Woolverton, Theoron was the son of Dr. Jonathan Woolverton, one of the pioneer physicians of the district. Edgar Judson Woolverton was one of the most widely known and highly respected fruit men of Canada, and brother of Theoron Woolverton. Theoron was the nephew of Grimsby’s Charles Woolverton born in 1820, son of Dennis Woolverton, reformer in politics and a member of the Upper Canada’s legislative assembly from 1834-1836. Father of Linus Woolverton a successful journalist as well as farmer

27 Page 77 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

and fruit raiser with many honourable appointments and achievements. In 1969 the Danish Lutheran Church purchased the property at 130 Main St East, the Danish Church bought the house from Harold Jarvis, Harold was a local real estate agent in Grimsby. ii) Yields, or has the potential to yield, Yes This home contributes to the understanding of the fruit information that contributes to an industry displayed along the historic Main Street corridor. understanding of a community or This structure became significant to the Lutheran culture, or community in Grimsby and acted as a central gathering point.

iii) Demonstrates or reflects the work or Yes James Balfour was recognized as the architect associated ideas of an architect, artist, with the design at 130 Main St E in Grimsby. James Balfour builder, designer or theorist who was a successful architect from Hamilton, Balfour created is significant to a community. beautiful buildings for a large part of two decades during the 1800’s.

7.3 The property has contextual value because it,

3. The property has contextual value because it,

i) Is important in defining, maintaining Yes The property located at 130 Main St E is representative of or supporting the character of an the age and architectural style that historically was found area, along the historic Main Street corridor.

ii) Is physically, functionally, visually or Yes The dwelling at 130 Main Street East is physically, historically linked to its functionally, visually and historically linked to its surroundings, or surroundings as it contributes to the Council identified Cultural Heritage Landscape along the historic Main Street corridor. The scale, mass and form of the historic dwelling contributes to the cohesive collection of traditional farm house estates that continued to fill the significant streetscape as the Main Street developed. The remaining farm house estates act as vestiges of the past as they depict the successful tender fruit industry that contributed the prosperity of the Town. iii) Is a landmark. No Property is not a landmark

7.4 CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST

“The statement of cultural heritage value or interest, including a description of the heritage attributes along with all other components of the Heritage Designation Brief constitute the "Reasons for the Designation" required under the Ontario Heritage Act. The Heritage Designation Brief is available for viewing in the Town Planning Department during regular business hours.”

7.5 STATEMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST

The home at 130 Main Street East is an Italianate residence. The Italianate influences can be seen in the wide cornice brackets, quoin brick details, double doors, paired hooded windows, bay windows, triple windows, a bull’s eye window and a hipped roof with flat deck top. The windows are dressed with segmental arches with a contrasting key stone and matching tooled sill. The red clay brick structure is sitting on a cut stone foundation, the stone is a red local quarried limestone supported by a lime based mortar.

28 Page 78 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

The home is finished with a porch that spans the length of the façade, the porch is enhanced by a portico over the main entrance.

The historic dwelling displays a high degree of craftsmanship and artistic merit. The Italianate style dwelling is ornately crafted with stone carved keystones, carved corbels, decorative brick coins, bay windows, decorative frieze and elaborate frontispiece. The historic home is a true testament to the traditional craftspeople of the past generations.

The dwelling on 130 Main Street was built in the mid 19th century circa 1880 by Walter Henry Nelles, the home sits along a road named after the Nelles family. The Nelles family is one of the most well-known families in Grimsby’s history. Walter was the great nephew of Robert Nelles. Walter Henry Nelles was the brother-in-law of Theoron Woolverton, Theoron was the son of Dr. Jonathan Woolverton, one of the pioneer physicians of the district. Edgar Judson Woolverton was one of the most widely known and highly respected fruit men of Canada, and brother of Theoron Woolverton. Theoron was the nephew of Grimsby’s Charles Woolverton born in 1820, son of Dennis Woolverton, reformer in politics and a member of the Upper Canada’s legislative assembly from 1834-1836. Father of Linus Woolverton a successful journalist as well as farmer and fruit raiser with many honourable appointments and achievements. In 1969 the Danish Lutheran Church purchased the property at 130 Main St East, the Danish Church bought the house from Harold Jarvis, Harold was a local real estate agent in Grimsby.

This home was associated with the establishment of the fruit industry in Grimsby Township. Later this structure became significant to the Lutheran community in Grimsby and a central gathering point.

James Balfour was recognized as the architect associated with the design at 130 Main St E in Grimsby. James Balfour was a successful architect from Hamilton, Balfour created beautiful buildings for a large part of two decades during the 1800’s. The property located at 130 Main St E is representative of the age and architectural style that historically was found along the historic Main Street corridor.

The dwelling at 130 Main Street East is physically, functionally, visually and historically linked to its surroundings as it contributes to the Council identified Cultural Heritage Landscape along the historic Main Street corridor. The scale, mass and form of the historic dwelling contributes to the cohesive collection of traditional farm house estates that continued to fill the significant streetscape as the Main Street developed. The remaining farm house estates act as vestiges of the past as they depict the successful tender fruit industry that contributed the prosperity of the Town.

29 Page 79 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

7.6 HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES TO BE DESIGNATED

The Heritage Attributes to be designated at 130 Main Street East include:

 Hipped roof with flat deck top  Front facing gable and eave returns  Front portico- pediment with Doric columns, brick plinths and dentils  Wide intercut cornice with brackets  Covered front veranda with dentils in the cornice & wood railing  Original openings with stone sills  Bulls eye window and original glass pane  Semi-circular double and triple hung wood windows and original glass panes  Paired hooded windows and original glass panes  Bay window with ornate architrave, cornice, and brackets  Wood door with arched windows (14 panes)  Brick Quoins on corners  Cut stone foundation – regular coursed layout & lime based mortar  Original Chimney

8.0 SUMMARY

The building at 130 Main Street East is known as Danish Lutheran Church meets the criteria set out in the Ontario Heritage Act for designation under Part IV, Section 29. It therefore is recommended by Town Staff that the subject property be designated under Section 29, Part IV of the Act for the significant value determined in Section 2 of this report. The statement of cultural heritage value or interest contained in Section 3.1 of this report includes the heritage attributes identified in Section 3.2. These attributes have been determined to merit designation as they contribute to the significance of the building, and specifically the front façade of the original building, and as such should be outlined in the designation by-law as significant elements.

8.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

8.1 SUMMARY

The building at 130 Main Street meets the criteria set out in the Ontario Heritage Act for designation under Part IV, Section 29. It therefore is recommended by Town Staff that the subject property be designated under Section 29, Part IV of the Act for the significant value determined in Section 7 of this report. The statement of cultural heritage value or interest contained in Section 7.5 of this report includes the heritage attributes identified in Section 7.6. These attributes have been determined to merit designation as they contribute to the significance of the building, and specifically the front façade of the original building, and as such should be outlined in the designation by-law as significant elements.

The limitations of this report are based on missing information from the time this structure was constructed in the late 1800s. During the production of this report various information was required and unfortunately based on the age of the structure and lack of documentation we were unable to identify all information.

30 Page 80 of 198 Town of Grimsby Heritage Heritage Research Report October 2020 130 Main Street East

The analysis of this report was completed with the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. During the analysis the following was prepared:

 Description of Property  Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.  Description of Heritage Attributes and  Legal Description

Policy framework has been created to ensure the conservation of heritage sites and architectural attributes. The following policies have been put in place from both the municipal and provincial level. These policies are as follows:

 Provincial Policy Statement  Regional Official Plan  Town of Grimsby Official Plan

8.2 Findings

During the analysis of this report the attributes and the architectural significance of this structure were identified. This historic structure contains many of the original architectural elements from its construction in the late 1800s. In addition this historic structure contributes to the architectural style, massing and scale that was traditionally found along this streetscape. The historic structure was designed by well-known architect James Balfour from Hamilton and displayed many of the architect’s significant architectural styles. This dwelling belonged to significant families in the Grimsby district and was instrumental in the Danish Lutheran community being a place of worship for many years. This property is situated on a large sized property with a backdrop of the escarpment framing the historic dwelling. This structure and its landscape contribute to the cultural heritage landscape that can be found along the historic Main Street corridor.

During the assessment of cultural heritage value or interest on this particular historic structure it was determined that this building meets 7 of the required criteria to be considered for designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

8.3 Recommendations

Based on the assessment of cultural heritage value or interest staff has recommended that this structure be designated under Part IV, section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

31 Page 81 of 198 October 2020

HERITAGE RESEARCH 141 Main Street East October REPORT Grimsby, Ontario 2020

Page 82 of 198 1.0 INFORMATION SUMMARY

PROPERTY INFORMATION

Address: 141 Main Street East, Grimsby, ON, L3M 1P2

Roll Number: 261502001618500

Short Legal CON 1 PT LT 6, North Grimsby; PTS 30 & 31 & SUBJECT TO Description: AN EASEMENT OVER PTS 24 to 29, 30R-10405 ; GRIMSBY

Heritage Type: Built Structure

Heritage Status: Listed Heritage Property

Name of Heritage Cole’s Christmas Cottage/ Brass & Wicker House Item: OWNER INFORMATION

Names of Owners: Losani Homes

Owners Address: 430 MCNEILLY RD , Unit 203 STONEY CREEK, ON, CAN, L8E5E3

REPORT INFORMATION

Report Purpose: Provide an evaluation of the potential cultural heritage value or interest of the property and provide recommendations on the actions for conservation.

Date: October 2020

Designation Brief Bianca Verrecchia, Assistant Heritage Planner Completed by: - Heritage Conservation Diploma– Williowbank School of Restoration Arts 2019 - Architectural Technologist Advanced Diploma – Mohawk College 2014

Antonietta Minichillo, MES, RPP, CAHP, Director of Planning, Building & By-Law

- Undergrad York University Geography and Urban Studies - Masters in Environmental Studies, Planning Stream, York University - Masters Thesis: The Economics of Heritage Preservation: A Case Study on the John Street

2 Page 83 of 198 Roundhouse

Janice Hogg, MCIP, RPP, Senior Planner

- Master of Heritage Conservation – University of Sydney 2009 - Bachelor of Environmental Studies, Honours Planning – University of Waterloo 2005

Anniversary Article - Grimsby Archives, Obituary – Grimsby Public Library, Niagara this week – Coles, Coles Website, The New York Botanical Garden

3 Page 84 of 198

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report was prepared to assess the building at 141 Main Street East against the criteria for the Ontario Heritage Act for designation under Section 29, Part IV of the Act. Research was undertaken by consulting primary and secondary sources and site visits were undertaken to evaluate the dwelling and take photographs. Currently, this building is the site of Coles Florist.

1.1 REPORT LIMITATIONS

The limitations of this report are based on missing information from the time this structure was constructed in the late 1800s to early 1900s. During the production of this report various information was required and unfortunately based on the age of the structure and lack of documentation we were unable to identify the following:

1. Date of Construction 2. Name of Architect or Builder

Note: Exterior analysis only

2.0 STUDY APPROACH

The analysis of this report was completed using resources within the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. During the analysis the following was prepared:

1. Description of Property 2. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest. 3. Description of Heritage Attributes and 4. Legal Description

2.1 DEFINITIONS & ABBREVATIONS

2.2.1 Abbreviations

CHL- Cultural Heritage Landscape

GPS- Global Positioning System

HG&B- Hamilton Grimsby and Beamsville Electric Railway

ICOMOS- International Council on Monuments and Sites

LPAT- Local Planning Appeal Tribunal

MHR- Municipal Heritage Register

MHSTCI- Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries

NHSC- National Historic Site of Canada

4 Page 85 of 198 NTS- National Topographic Systems

OBC- Ontario Building Code

OHA- Ontario Heritage Act

OP- Official Plan

O. Reg 9/06 – Ontario Regulation 9/06- Criteria for determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.

Section 29- Part IV- Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act is the designation of a heritage property.

Section 29- Part V- Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act is the designation of a heritage conservation district.

ZBL- Zoning Bylaw

2.2.2 Definitions

Adaptation: Modification of a heritage item to suit a proposed, compatible use.

Alter: “alter” means to change in any manner and includes to restore, renovate, repair or disturb and “alteration” has a corresponding meaning; (“transformer”, “transformation”)

Archaeology: A set of theories, methods and techniques for the study of human culture and civilization, using scientific investigation of physical remains of past activities. Archaeological Resource: All tangible evidence of human activity that is of historical, cultural or scientific interest. Examples include features, structures, archaeological objects or remains at or from an archaeological site, or an object recorded as an isolated archaeological find.

Archaeological Sites: A place or area where tangible evidence of human activity of historical, cultural or scientific interest is or was located on, above or below the ground, whether submerged or not. The identification, recovery and interpretation of this evidence can be carried out using archaeological research methods.

Artefacts: Any object manufactured, used, moved or otherwise modified by human beings, including all waste materials and by-products of these processes.

Attribute: A property or quality of any archaeological object such as the length of a projectile point, the hardness of a potsherd or the colour of a bottle fragment.

Built Heritage Resources: a building, structure, monument, installation or any manufactured remnant that contributes to a property's cultural heritage value or interest as identified by a community, including an Aboriginal Indigenous community. Built heritage resources are generally located on property that has been designated

5 Page 86 of 198 under Parts lV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act, or included on local, provincial and/or federal registers.

Character-defining elements: The materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings that contribute to the heritage value of a historic place, and which must be retained in order to preserve its heritage value.

Construction date: The date of construction of the historic place (may be approximate).

Conservation: All actions or processes that are aimed at safeguarding the fundamental characteristics of a cultural resource in order to preserve its heritage value and extend its physical life. This may involve “preservation,” “rehabilitation,” “restoration” or a combination of these actions or processes.

Consultation: The term public consultation refers to the two-way process of providing and seeking information and advice from the general public, governments, Aboriginal peoples, interest groups and others on the management of protected heritage places. Consultation is only one of the many aspects of the overall public engagement.

Culture: The concept of culture can be defined as the “set of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual and emotional features of society or a social group” encompassing,“ in addition to art and literature, lifestyles, ways of living together, value systems, traditions and beliefs.”

Cultural Heritage Landscapes; a defined geographical area that may have been modified by human activity and is identified as having cultural heritage value or interest by a community, including an Aboriginal indigenous community. The area may involve features such as structures, spaces, archaeological sites or natural elements that are valued together for their interrelationship, meaning or association. Examples may include, but are not limited to, heritage conservation districts designated under the Ontario Heritage Act; villages, parks, gardens, battlefields, main streets and neighbourhoods, cemeteries, trail ways, view sheds, natural areas and industrial complexes of heritage significance; and areas recognized by federal or international designation authorities (e.g. a National Historic Site or District designation, or a UNESCO World Heritage Site).

Demolition: The damaging, defacing, destroying or dismantling of a heritage item or a component of a heritage conservation area, in whole or in part.

Façade: The face of a building; an architectural drawing of the vertical projection of the face of a building.

Guidelines: Statements that provide practical guidance in applying the Standards for the conservation of historic places. They are presented here in a format that provides recommended and non-recommend actions.

Heritage Attribute: “heritage attributes” means, in relation to real property, and to the buildings and structures on the real property, the attributes of the property, buildings and structures that contribute to their cultural heritage value or interest

6 Page 87 of 198

Heritage Fabric: All the physical material of an item, including surroundings and contents which contribute to its heritage significance.

Historic Place: A structure, building, group of buildings, district, landscape, archaeological site or other place in Canada that has been formally recognized for its heritage value by an appropriate authority within a jurisdiction.

Heritage Resource: A Heritage Area or any natural or cultural features associated with heritage areas or potential Areas.

Historical Value: The aesthetic, historic, scientific, cultural, social or spiritual importance or significance for past, present or future generations. The heritage value of a historic place is embodied in its character-defining materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings.

Inspect: “inspect” includes to survey, photograph, measure and record

Microfilm: A length of film containing microphotographs of documents.

Owner: means the person registered on title in the proper land registry office as owner.

Place: A site, area or landscape or group of works, together with associated structures, contents and surrounds.

Preservation: The action or process of protecting, maintaining and/or stabilizing the existing materials, form and integrity of a historic place, or of an individual component, while protecting its heritage value.

Protected Heritage Property: property designated under Parts lV, V or Vl of the Ontario Heritage Act; property subject to a heritage conservation easement under Parts ll or lV of the Ontario Heritage Act; property identified by the Province and prescribed public bodies as provincial heritage property under the Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties; property protected under federal legislation, and UNESCO World Heritage Sites.

Rarity: An item having this value is significant because it represents a rare, endangered or unusual aspect of our history or cultural heritage.

Reconstruction: Returning a place as nearly as possible to a known earlier state by the introduction of new or old materials into the fabric.

Rehabilitation: The action or process of making possible a continuing or compatible contemporary use for a historic place, or of an individual component, through repair, alterations and/or additions, while protecting its heritage value.

Restoration: The action or process of accurately revealing, recovering or representing the state of a historic place, or of an individual component, as it appeared at a particular period in its history, while protecting its heritage value.

7 Page 88 of 198 Tribunal: means the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal

2.2 METHODOLOGY

This report follows a three-step approach to understanding and planning for cultural heritage resources:

•Understanding the heritage planning regulatory framework;

•Understanding the significance of heritage resource (known and potential); and,

•Understanding the existing conditions of the property.

This is consistent with the recommended methodology outlined by the Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries (MHSTCI) within its 2006 publication Heritage Property Evaluation. The MHSTCI identifies three key steps: Historical Research, Site Analysis, and Evaluation. This was augmented with a policy analysis to outline the provincial and local policy contexts.

2.3 LEGISLATIVE POLICY

In the Province of Ontario, the process for determining cultural heritage value is prescribed via O. Reg. 9/06 of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). Further, in order to better understand the local context for evaluation of cultural heritage value or interest under the OHA, it must be determined if there are any supplemental municipal approaches or priorities that augment the provincially established process. For example, a municipality can build on the criteria of O.Reg. 9/06 by using adopted thematic history; identifying specific views in its Official Plan; or by adopting an evaluative template. The legislative and policy framework for this report is presented in Section 3 below.

3.0 POLICY FRAMEWORK

Policy framework has been created to ensure the conservation of heritage sites and architectural attributes. The following policies have been put in place from both the municipal and provincial level. These policies are as follows:

1. Provincial Policy Statement 2. Regional Official Plan 3. Town of Grimsby Official Plan 4. Growth Plan For The Greater Golden Horseshoe 5. Escarpment Plan 6. Council Identified Cultural Heritage Landscapes

3.1 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT

The following provisions are from the Provincial Policy Statement and pertains to Cultural Heritage.

2.6 Cultural heritage and archaeology

8 Page 89 of 198

2.6.1 Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved.

2.6.3 Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.

2.6.5 Planning authorities shall engage with Indigenous communities and consider their interests when identifying, protecting and managing cultural heritage and archaeological resources.

3.2 REGIONAL OFFICAL PLAN

The following provisions are from the Regional Official Plan and pertains to Cultural Heritage.

10. C.2 Policies

Policy 10. C.2.1 -Built Heritage Resources, Cultural Heritage Landscapes and Archaeological Resources

Policy 10.C.2.1.1 Significant built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved using the provisions of the Heritage Act, the Planning Act, the Environmental Assessment Act, the Funeral, Burial and Cremations Act and the Municipal Act.

Policy 10.C.2.1.2 The Region shares an interest in the protection and conservation of significant built heritage resources and encourages local municipalities to develop policies to protect and conserve locally significant built heritage resources and to utilize its authority under the Ontario Heritage Act to designate individual properties, cultural heritage landscapes and heritage conservation districts that are of cultural heritage value or interest.

Policy 10.C.2.1.3 Municipalities are encouraged to establish a Municipal Heritage Committee (MHC) to advise and assist Council on matters related to Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act. Local Councils may expand the role of this committee to advise and assist Local Councils on other matters of cultural heritage conservation.

Policy 10.C.2.1.4 Public works projects and plans undertaken or reviewed by the Region, where in the vicinity of significant built and/ or cultural heritage landscapes will be designed in a sensitive manner and will provide appropriate mitigation measures in both design and location to conserve, enhance and complement the existing significant built and/ or cultural heritage resources.

Policy 10.C.2.1.5 Where development, site alteration and/ or a public works project is proposed on or adjacent to a significant built heritage resource(s) or cultural heritage landscapes , a heritage impact assessment will be required. The findings of the assessment shall include recommendations for design alternatives and satisfactory

9 Page 90 of 198 measures to mitigate any negative impacts on identified significant heritage resources.

Policy 10.C.2.1.6 The Region encourages local municipalities to establish Cultural Heritage Landscapes policies in their official plans and identify Significant Cultural Heritage Landscapes for designation. The purpose of this designation is to conserve groupings of features (buildings, structures, spaces, archaeological sites and natural elements) with heritage attributes that, together form a significant type of heritage form, distinctive from that of its constituent elements or parts.

Policy 10.C.2.1.7 The local municipalities shall adopt official plan policies to conserve significant cultural heritage resources and ensure that development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected properties will conserve the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property.

Policy 10.C.2.1.8 The Region will assist local municipalities with the preparation of Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation Plans for Significant Cultural Heritage Landscapes that cross municipal boundaries or are of Regional interest.

Policy 10.C.2.1.9 The Region, in collaboration with local municipalities, will prepare and maintain a Regional Implementation Guideline for Significant Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation.

3.3 TOWN OF GRIMSBY OFFICAL PLAN

The following provisions are from the Town of Grimsby Official Plan and pertains to Cultural Heritage.

8.0 CULTURAL HERITAGE AND ARCHAEOLOGY

8.18 Development and site alteration may be permitted on in the vicinity of protected heritage property where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.

Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches may be required in order to conserve the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property affected by the adjacent development or site alteration.

10 Page 91 of 198 4.0 PROPERTY CONTEXT

4.1 Property Location

The subject site is located at 141 Main Street East and can be seen in Figure 1 below highlighted in yellow. The property is situated on Main Street East between Nelles Road North and Wentworth Drive.

FIGURE 1: The subject site at 141 Main Street East, Grimsby, Ontario as indicated by the yellow outline. Source: Mitown.

4.2 Property Context

The historic property is located along the Main Street historic corridor. This historic corridor is illustrated below based on the following contextual attributes:

The historic Main Street corridor is a council identified significant Cultural Heritage Landscape which was identified in 2015. The Main Street East District is of cultural heritage value as an intact historic 19th and early 20th Century agricultural landscape of the tender fruit farming industry. Situated midway between the Escarpment and Lake Ontario, Farms stretched both north and south. The shape of the farms were generally long and narrow as a result of landscape features and the original survey pattern. This resulted in Farm dwellings being situated in relatively close proximity forming a near urban environment. The Quality and scale of the Architecture on this stretch of Main Street is testament to the prosperity of the tender fruit farming industry and the fertility of the land. The construction date of most of the houses is in the late 1800s and early 1900s an indication of the prosperity that came with the arrival of the Hamilton Grimsby

11 Page 92 of 198 and Beamsville Electric Railway in 1894. A defining feature of the landscape are the distinctive fruit barns. Many of the original fruit barns still survive to this day, located just to the rear of the houses. A landmark of the area is the Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates. A memorial to the local men and women who fell in the First World War. The gate is constructed of local red limestone. It is a reminder of the significance of the conflict on the community which saw many local families impacted.

Description of Heritage Attributes

Key attributes of the Main Street East District that reflect its value as an important link to the history of Grimsby include:

1. 19th and early 20th Century Residential Architecture 2. Mature Trees 3. Fruit Barns 4. Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates 5. Centennial Park (1967) view to the escarpment 6. Backdrop view towards the Niagara Escarpment

The property at 141 Main Street E contributes to the following of the above mentioned attributes of the historic Main Street Cultural Heritage Landscape. This property contributes to the 19th and early 20th century residential architectural style that is historically found along this corridor. Unfortunately over time the mature trees and potential fruit barn has been removed from this site. The Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates, Centennial Park (view of escarpment) and backdrop view towards the Niagara Escarpment does not apply to this site. Thus this property is not contribute to the significance of these particular attributes.

5.0 SITE ANALYSIS

5.1 Existing Condition

The site currently consists of the following structures:

1. Historic two storey converted dwelling

The site currently consists of the following landscaping:

2. Parking lot 3. Surround parking lot is landscaped with gardens and trees

12 Page 93 of 198 6.0 HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY

6.1 Site Development

Year Event Around 1876 This property is identified as belonging to J.A Nelles on the 1862 Tremaine Map, and JWG Nelles in the 1876 Historic Atlas Map. The house is known as the Beamer house. J.E Beamer is identified as the owner of the northwest corner of Lot 6. Concession 2 in the 1876 country Atlas Map. 1907 NTS map shows a building in this location 1910 Benjamin Cook to Orsic G. W. Neal 1939 George E Neal to Bruno Raudrity 19** Bruno Raudrity to Hildegarde1

1983 House was purchased by Luba Kinal – The first floor of the home was used for a commercial business and Luba continued to live on the second floor of the home. 2 2002 Luba’s property was known as the brass and wicker house. In 2002 Harry purchased the neighboring property, this property was known as the Brass and Wicker House. With the purchase of this property, Cole’s continued to expand. In October the Brass and Wicker house became the Christmas cottage (next door to 147 Main St E).

1 Land Registry Office 2 Newspaper Article – Brass and Wicker House – Grimsby Achieves

13 Page 94 of 198 6.2 Development of Main Street East

Over the last 150 years the historic Main Street East corridor has seen substantial changes which are depicted below in several maps. The earliest map below depicts the street as early as 1862 and as the later maps appear it is evident that this street scape has developed significantly. Large brick and sided buildings filled the vacant parcels. This precedent produced a substantial corridor which was developed using similar materials and in exchange created a cohesive streetscape. The 1975 map shown below depicts several of the older structures that were seen in this streetscape for over a hundred years; however, comparison of historical mapping to current condition reflects that several of the original homes have been replaced with strip malls along this street scape with substantial demolishment of historic structures within the last 50 years. The heritage structures that remain along this streetscape are important vestiges of this cultural heritage landscape.

Figure: 3 - 1871 Patent Plan for Grimsby Township Figure: 4 - 1862 Tremaine Map – Source: Tremaine 1862

Figure: 5 - 1876 County Atlas Map Source: McGill Figure: 6 - 1907 NTS Maps University Source: Department of Militia and Defense

14 Page 95 of 198

Figure: 7 - 1923 NTS Maps Figure: 8 - 1929 NTS Maps Source: Department of Militia and Defense Source: Department of Militia and Defense

Figure: 9 - 1934 NTS Maps Figure: 10 - 1938 NTS Maps Source: Department of Militia and Defense Source: Department of Militia and Defense

Figure: 11 - 1934 Aerial Photograph Source: Google Earth

15 Page 96 of 198 3 Contextual Photographs

Existing Cole’s Florist

Original Location

1975 Map showing demolished structures along Main Street East, outlined in yellow. Source: Grimsby Archives

Existing Cole’s Florist

2019 Map showing existing remaining historical structures along this section of Main Street East, outlined in yellow. Source: Grimsby Archives

16 Page 97 of 198 .

Existing Cole’s Florist

Pictured above are the demolished historical structures along Main Street East. The property currently occupied by Cole’s Florist located at 147 Main St E is representative of the vernacular architectural style that was historically found along this historic Main Street corridor. The below image depicts the current conditions to illustrate the contrast between the historical streetscape and the remaining components of this historical streetscape.

Source: Grimsby Archives

Existing Cole’s Florist

Pictured above are the remaining historical structures along Main Street East. The properties currently occupied by Cole’s Florist located at 147 Main St E is representative of the vernacular architectural style that was historically found along this historic Main Street corridor. This image is contrasted with the above image which illustrates the historical streetscape.

Source: Town of Grimsby - September 2019

17 Page 98 of 198 Pictured beside and below are the contextual photographs along Main Street. The first image taken in 1990 is compared to the photographs taken in 2019. Significant heritage structures have been demolished over the last 29 years with 147 Main Street West being one of the few remaining structures along this streetscape.

Pictured beside and below are the contextual photographs along Main Street. The first image taken in 1990 compared to the photographs taken in 2019.

18 Page 99 of 198 6.4 Elevations of Site

Front Elevation - 2018

West Elevation – 2018

East Elevation- 2018

19 Page 100 of 198

Christmas Cottage 1998

Christmas Cottage 2009 – Google Maps

20 Page 101 of 198 6.5 Site Description

The framed structure located at 141 Main Street East stands two storeys high with a stucco cladded exterior, the exterior is representative of the Queen Anne style architecture. The asphalt roof line is interrupted by a front facing gabled dormer, the dormer is divided by three flat topped windows. The exterior of the structure is dressed with a tower at the west end of the front façade, the tower is accented with a finial and flat topped windows. The structure is sitting on a cut stone foundation, the porch is supported by two turned columns. The rear of the structure has a shed dormer and an addition.

Turret

Two of many original wood windows

Dormer Turret

Turned Columns ` Stucco Cladding Bell-cast Eaves

Cut Stone Foundation

21 Page 102 of 198 6.6 Historical Information

During the historical research of this historic structure the following information was collected. Some of this information is directly associated with the structure as well as additional historical research pertaining to the original Coles Florist and the family associated with Coles Florist.

6.6.1 History of the Cook Family (Benjamin Cook – previous homeowner)

Benjamin was born in 1852 in Ontario to his father Thomas Cook Sr. and his mother Jane Goldie. Benjamin then married Elizabeth Callander in 1878 in Scotland they then had four children together. After the death of Elizabeth Callander, Benjamin remairred Deborah J. Johnston and they had one child together. Benjamin lived in Grimsby and had a small fruit farm. 3

6.6.2 History of the Neal Family (Osric Neal – previous homeowner)

Osric G W Neal was born in 1859 in Grimsby, Ontario to George Neal and Hannah Neal. Osric went on to marry Marilla Alverta Roszel in 1886 in Grimsby. They went on to have 10 kids in 17 years. Osric owned the property at 141 Main St E in 1910 Osric was a fruit farmer and farmed this parcel of land he then went on to sell the property to his son George Neal in 1939. 4

6.6.3 History of Cole’s Family (Family of Norman Cole – previous homeowner)

In 1885 Albert Edward Cole returned to Grimsby, and fortunately for Albert he was able to trade his unsuccessful lots in Weston for a property in Grimsby. On horseback he set out for a new life, upon arriving here Albert opened a small business. Albert found his inspiration to start a greenhouse business after visiting Dale Estates in Brampton, one of the world’s largest operations. With a passion for growing vegetables and flowers, Albert started to grow an English garden and was able to sell his lettuce and tomatoes to the hotels at Grimsby Beach. Albert continued to grow his business with the addition of a 1000 sq. ft. green house, with the expansion of the greenhouse produce was able to be grown year-round indoors. 5

3 Ancestory.com – Benjamin Cook : Census, Birth, Marriage and Death Ceritificates 4 Ancestory.com – Orsic Neal : Census, Birth, Marriage and Death Ceritificates 5 Grimsby Archives – Anniversary Article

22 Page 103 of 198

In 1900 Albert married Annie Spiers, Annie Spiers was the granddaughter of a war veteran Trumpeter Blakely. Trumpeter gave his services during the Spanish war and proudly fought under General Brock at the battle of Queenston Heights.6 Albert and Annie met at a camera shop in Grimsby, owned by Albert’s uncle. Later the couple married and purchased a property with a brick house, the house was constructed in 1855 and had a unique brick pattern. The property consisted of five acers and was located on Main Street East. An additional greenhouse was added to the property in 1912 from a St. Catherine’s Company known as Lord and Burnham. With the additional green house the couple started to grow violets and vegetables. In 1914 the greenhouse was completely compromised by a major hailstorm, a new green house was added to the property in 1929. Over the years Coles became the largest florist operation between Toronto and Niagara Falls. 7 Cole’s florist and Grimsby beach had a unique connection during the early 1900’s, Albert sold his produce to the two largest hotels located in Grimsby beach. Later continuing to supply the community with fresh produce every Saturday at the Grimsby Beach Market. As Albert’s family continued to grow he expected and encouraged his young children to be actively involved in the family business, after a long week the boys would be encouraged to head down to the beach. They happily enjoyed the roller coaster and entertainment attractions along the midway strip. The Cole boys often found themselves at the beach selling bunches of radishes. The family was instrumental in the success of Cole’s, every family member participated in the business and played an important role. Having a greenhouse in these days was very difficult and exhausting, Norman the oldest son often stayed the night with his father while he heated the greenhouses with coal fed boilers. The hard work never seemed to end, when it came to deliveries in those days there was only three options, by foot, horse and buggy or street cars. Norman Cole often found himself riding the street car making deliveries for his parents and on many occasions Norman would deliver flowers for his father’s regular customer Senator Gibson. Norman was a young and creative child and often traded a carnation for his ride, keeping the street car fare for the midway or candy. In 1914 life would get a little easier as the family purchased their first delivery truck, the first delivery was to the Liddle family of Grimsby. The successful business continued to grow and by 1930 the Cole family owned more then 25,000 square feet of greenhouse. With such a large expansion and the passing of Annie it was time for A. E. Cole to bring his sons into the business full time, the sons were significant contributors supporting the demand for deliveries, floral arrangement and maintenance. The Coles boys showed great interest in the family business and by 1932 the three of them had purchased the business from their father. After the Coles boys married their spouses became instrumental in the success of the business, especially Norman’s wife Elizabeth.

6 Annie Cole (Nee Spiers) Obituary – Grimsby Public Library 7 Grimsby Archives – Anniversary Article

23 Page 104 of 198 Along with having an expanded greenhouse business, Albert had rental property at 91 Main Street East. The large brick home was divided into apartments and later sold to A.E’s daughter Mildred and her husband, with the agreement that Albert would always have a place to stay. 8

Coles Apartments 91 Main Street Grimsby Cole’s florist continued to expand, in 1957, a store front was constructed at the entrance of the property. Along with an expanding business the Cole’s family grew once again as Albert welcomed many grandchildren, the grandchildren were encouraged to help wherever things were lacking. In 1962 after the passing of John Cole, Norman and Elizabeth Cole bought out Gordon’s shares in the company. Norman and Elizabeth often spoke of their business trips to the American Carnation Societies Convention each year. In 1972 Norman purchased the home on 147 Main Street East now known as Cole’s Florist. Finally in 1975 the couple celebrated their 50th wedding anniversary with a trip around the world in 18 days. 11 years later Norman, 84 and Elizabeth, 78 were ready for retirement, and for the first time in 95 years the company was sold to someone outside the Coles Family.

Elizabeth and Norman working at Cole’s 1984- Grimsby Achieves

8 Grimsby Archives – Anniversary Article

24 Page 105 of 198 Elizabeth and Norman sold the business to the DeVries and entered into a well deserved retirement. The DeVries acknowledge and understood the long history of the Cole family and the significance of this landmark business over the last 100 years. Mr. DeVries once said “It is certainly one of the oldest existing businesses in Grimsby and along with that comes a lot of tradition”. The DeVries family had their fair share of experience already owning Lincoln Florist in Smithville. After the sale of Cole’s Florist the DeVries decided to move the business across the street from the original location, the Devries felt the success of the business was linked to the location of the business and its many dedicated customers, it was only smart to move the business to an adjacent property, they then moved the business to 147 Main St E. 9

Harry Devries at the new Grimsby and Stoney Creek locations – Grimsby Archives After the move the renovations started, the DeVries expanded the existing structure by 1200 sq. ft. The addition was made on an older existing home, the intention of this renovation was to mimic the original Cole’s style that many people had grown to love. With an effort to serve their customers more effectively, Harry tore down the yellow cottage next door and built a 3000 sq. ft. greenhouse. The business continued to flourish and required an addition 1200 sq. ft. for storage and deliveries along with additional space for floral design workshops, and finally in 1991 the renovations were completed with a new roof, siding, windows and landscaping just in time for the 100 anniversary celebration. 10

Grimsby Archives

9 Grimsby Archives – Anniversary Article 10 Grimsby Archives – Anniversary Article

25 Page 106 of 198 Over the years Cole’s Florist has evolved from the humble beginnings of horse and buggy delivery service to a national online purchasing company with the ability to ship all over North America. The DeVries continue to represent the Cole’s name with quality service and products in a building that represents the history displayed on this streetscape over the last 100 years.

History of Cole’s Florist (Normal Cole son of Albert Edward Cole lived in 147 Main St E)

Year Event Albert Edward returned to Grimsby and started growing flowers and vegetables. From his English 1885 garden, lettuce and tomatoes were sold to the hotels at Grimsby Park. 11

Albert Edward Cole established Cole’s Florist. Albert constructed a 1,000 sq. ft. greenhouse on the 1891 former sawmill and started growing violets and vegetables.12

The greenhouse is expanded to 25,000 sq. ft. 1930

1932 The business is purchased by Cole’s sons John, Gordon and Norman.

Norman and his wife Elizabeth become sole owners. 1957

1986 After 96 years of family ownership, Cole’s was sold to Harry and Nancy DeVries. After 10 days of the purchase, Coles was moved across the street to its current location. 13 1991 Stoney Creek location opened its doors. 1999 Parking Lot is expanded 2001 Coles under goes renovations to the flower shop and a second floor consultation area was added in addition to accessibility upgrades. 2002 Harry purchased the Brass and Wicker House. With the purchase of the neighboring property, Cole’s continued to expand.

2006 Cole’s Garden Décor opens across the street.

11 Niagara this week – Coles 12 Coles Website

26 Page 107 of 198

Original Location of Cole’s Florist at 150-152 Main St East– Grimsby Archives

Original Location of Cole’s Florist at 150-152 Main St East– Grimsby Archives

27 Page 108 of 198 6.6.4 History of Brass & Wicker House

The house was purchased by Luba Kinal in 1983, although the home was purchased as a dwelling Luba never expected the success that would come in the following years. Luba was happy to live on the top floor of the dwelling as her business demanded the main floor living space. Luba was well known for coating her products in a lacquer finish that gave the brass a longer life time. This property became known as the brass and wicker house. 14

14 Newspaper Article – Grimsby Achieves

28 Page 109 of 198 7.0 EVALUATION

7.1 Assessment of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest

A property may be designated under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act if it meets one or more of the following criteria for determining whether it is of cultural heritage value or interest

7.2 The property has design value or physical value because it:

Meets O. Reg. 9/06 Criteria Criteria Summary (Y/N)

1. The property has design value or physical value because it,

i) Is a rare, unique, representative or Yes The property located at 141 Main St East, is a early example of a style, type, representation of the architectural style and age that was expression, and material or found throughout the historic streetscape. With the construction method development of the strip malls many heritage structures were lost. 141 Main Street East acts as one of the few remaining of this age along the streetscape. The framed structure located at 141 Main Street East stands two storeys high with a stucco cladded exterior, the exterior is representative of the Queen Anne style architecture. The asphalt roof line is interrupted by a front facing gabled dormer, the dormer is divided by three flat topped windows. The exterior of the structure is dressed with a tower at the west end of the front façade, the tower is accented with a finial and flat topped windows. The structure is sitting on a cut stone foundation, the porch is supported by two turned columns. The rear of the structure has a shed dormer and an addition. ii) Displays a high degree of No Property does not display a high degree of craftsmanship craftsmanship or artistic merit or artistic merit

iii) Demonstrates a high degree of No Property does not demonstrate a high degree of technical technical or scientific or scientific achievement achievement

7.3 The property has historical value or associative value because it,

2. The property has historical value as of associative value because it,

i) Has direct associations with a theme, Yes The home at 141 Main St. E was built circa 1907 on the event, belief, person, activity, property originally owned by J.A Nelles originally owned organization or institution that is the land on which 147 Main St. E is situated. The Nelles significant to a community. family was a prominent family in the Grimsby Township and was among the first to come to the Forty.

The heritage home was owned by Benjamin Cook in the early 20th century, Benjamin was a local farmer from Scotland. Benjamin then sold the historic home to local Grimsby resident Osric G. W. Neal in 1910, Osric too was a local farmer. Osric and his family loved in the home for almost 30 years when the home was sold to his son local fruit farmer George Neal in 1939.

29 Page 110 of 198

The home’s first storefront use was known as the Brass and Wicker House. The Brass and Wicker House was established before 1985 and was know as a treasure trove to the citizen of Grimsby.

Norman Edward Cole purchased the home in 1971, Norman was the son of Albert Edward Cole founder of Coles Florist. Norman bought the company from his father over 88 years ago. In 1986 the floral company “Cole’s florist” moved into the historic dwelling, Cole’s florist has been a company since 1891. At one point Cole’s florist had became the largest floral operation from Toronto to Niagara Falls, often supplying the Grimsby Beach hotels and market with flowers. Normans great grandfather was war veteran Trumpeter Blakely, Trumpeter gave his services during the Spanish war and proudly fought under General Brock at the battle of Queenston Heights.

ii) Yields, or has the potential to yield, No Property does not yield, or have the potential to yield, information that contributes to an information that contributes to an understand of a understanding of a community or community or culture, or culture, or

iii) Demonstrates or reflects the work or No Property does not demonstrate or reflect the work or ideas of an architect, artist, ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist builder, designer or theorist who who sis significant to a community is significant to a community.

7.4 The property has contextual value because it,

3. The property has contextual value because it,

i) Is important in defining, maintaining Yes 141 Main Street is important in supporting the character or supporting the character of an of the Main Street corridor, with the removal of many area, wood frame structures, 141 Main Street East is representative of the vernacular architectural style that was historically found along this historic streetscape and is an important component of the Council identified Cultural Heritage Landscape.

ii) Is physically, functionally, visually or No Property is not physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its historically linked to its surroundings, or surroundings, or

iii) Is a landmark. No Property is not a landmark

7.5 CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST

“The statement of cultural heritage value or interest, including a description of the heritage attributes along with all other components of the Heritage Designation Brief constitute the "Reasons for the Designation" required under the Ontario Heritage Act. The Heritage Designation Brief is available for viewing in the Town Planning Department during regular business hours.”

30 Page 111 of 198 7.6 STATEMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST

The property located at 141 Main St East, is a representation of the architectural style that was found throughout the historic streetscape. With the development of the strip malls many heritage structures were lost. 141 Main Street East acts as one of the few remaining of this style along the streetscape. The frame structure located at 141 Main Street East stands two storeys high with a stucco cladded exterior, the exterior is representative of the Queen Anne style architecture. The asphalt roof line is interrupted by a front facing gabled dormer, the dormer is divided by three flat topped windows. The exterior of the structure is dressed with a tower at the west end of the front façade, the tower is accented with a finial and flat topped windows. The structure is sitting on a cut stone foundation, the porch is supported by two turned columns. The rear of the structure has a shed dormer and an addition.

The home at 141 Main St. E was built circa 1907 on the property originally owned by J.A Nelles originally owned the land on which 147 Main St. E is situated. The Nelles family was a prominent family in the Grimsby Township and was among the first to come to the Forty.

The heritage home was owned by Benjamin Cook in the early 20th century, Benjamin was a local farmer from Scotland. Benjamin then sold the historic home to local Grimsby resident Osric G. W. Neal in 1910, Osric too was a local farmer. Osric and his family loved in the home for almost 30 years when the home was sold to his son local fruit farmer George Neal in 1939.

The home’s first storefront use was known as the Brass and Wicker House. The Brass and Wicker House was established before 1985 and was know as a treasure trove to the citizen of Grimsby.

Norman Edward Cole purchased the home in 1971, Norman was the son of Albert Edward Cole founder of Coles Florist. Norman bought the company from his father over 88 years ago. In 1986 the floral company “Cole’s florist” moved into the historic dwelling, Cole’s florist has been a company since 1891. At one point Cole’s florist had became the largest floral operation from Toronto to Niagara Falls, often supplying the Grimsby Beach hotels and market with flowers. Normans great grandfather was war veteran Trumpeter Blakely, Trumpeter gave his services during the Spanish war and proudly fought under General Brock at the battle of Queenston Heights.

141 Main Street is important in supporting the character of the Main Street corridor, with the removal of many wood frame structures, 141 Main Street East is representative of the vernacular architectural style that was historically found along this historic streetscape and is an important component of the Council identified Cultural Heritage Landscape.

7.7 HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES TO BE DESIGNATED

The Heritage Attributes to be designated at 141 Main Street East include:

 Queen Anne Style Façade  Original wood windows and openings

31 Page 112 of 198  Tower with Finial  Porch and turned columns  Cut Stone Foundation  Stucco Cladded exterior  Front end gabled dormer

8.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

8.1 Summary

This report was prepared to assess the building at 141 Main Street East against the criteria for the Ontario Heritage Act for designation under Section 29, Part IV of the Act. Research was undertaken by consulting primary and secondary sources and site visits were undertaken to evaluate the dwelling and take photographs. The significant values of this structure have been determined in Section 7 of this report. The statement of cultural heritage value or interest is contained in Section 7.6. of this report, additionally the heritage attributes have been identified in Section 7.7. These attributes have been determined to merit designation as they contribute to the significance of the building, and as such should be outlined in the designation by-law as significant elements.

The limitations of this report are based on missing information from the time this structure was constructed in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s. During the production of this report various information was required and unfortunately based on the age of the structure and lack of documentation we were unable to identify the following:

 Date of Construction  Name of Architect or Builder

Exterior analysis only

The analysis of this report was completed using resources within the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. During the analysis the following was prepared:

 Description of Property  Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.  Description of Heritage Attributes and  Legal Description

Policy framework has been created to ensure the conservation of heritage sites and architectural attributes. The following policies have been put in place from both the municipal and provincial level. These policies are as follows:

 Provincial Policy Statement  Regional Official Plan  Town of Grimsby Official Plan

8.2 Findings

During the analysis of this report the attributes and the architectural significance of this structure has been identified. 141 Main St East is one of the few remaining historic wood

32 Page 113 of 198 frame structures along this portion of Main Street, in the early 1990’s several of the historic structures were demolished and replaced with plazas, drugstores, dental offices, and a . Based on the removal of so many large wood famed dwellings the value of the remaining wood framed structures has increased. Based on the significant demolishment of the neighboring heritage buildings, this remaining structure is critical in order to help depict early development along this streetscape.

During the assessment of cultural heritage value or interest on this particular historic structure it was determined that this building meets 3 of the required criteria to be considered for designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

8.3 Recommendations

Based on the assessment of cultural heritage value or interest staff has recommended that this structure designated under Part IV, section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

33 Page 114 of 198 October 2020

HERITAGE Cole’s Florist RESEARCH 147 Main Street East October REPORT Grimsby, Ontario 2020

Page 115 of 198 INFORMATION SUMMARY

PROPERTY INFORMATION

Address: 147 Main Street East, Grimsby, ON, L3M 1P2

Roll Number: 261502001618300

Short Legal PT LT 6 CON 1, North Grimsby (FMLY PCLS 18 & 19, PT PCL Description: 17), as in RO635982 & RO693171; PT 1 30R-8135 ; GRIMSBY

Heritage Status: Listed Heritage Property

Name of Heritage Resource : Cole’s Florist Building

OWNER INFORMATION

Names of Owners: Losani Homes

Owners Address: 430 MCNEILLY RD , Unit 203 STONEY CREEK, ON, CAN, L8E5E3 Mailing Address: 430 MCNEILLY RD , Unit 203 STONEY CREEK, ON, CAN, L8E5E3 REPORT INFORMATION Report Purpose: Provide an evaluation of the potential cultural heritage value or interest of the property and provide recommendations on the actions for conservation.

Date: October 2020

Designation Brief Bianca Verrecchia, Assistant Heritage Planner Completed by: - Heritage Conservation Diploma– Williowbank School of Restoration Arts 2019 - Architectural Technologist Advanced Diploma – Mohawk College 2014

Antonietta Minichillo, MES, RPP, CAHP, Director of Planning, Building & By-Law

- Undergrad York University Geography and Urban Studies - Masters in Environmental Studies, Planning Stream, York University - Masters Thesis: The Economics of Heritage Preservation: A Case Study on the John Street Roundhouse

2 Page 116 of 198 Janice Hogg, MCIP, RPP, Senior Planner

- Master of Heritage Conservation – University of Sydney 2009 - Bachelor of Environmental Studies, Honours Planning – University of Waterloo 2005

Sources: Anniversary Article - Grimsby Archives, Obituary – Grimsby Public Library, Niagara this week – Coles, Coles Website, The New York Botanical Garden

3 Page 117 of 198 1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report was prepared to assess the building at 145-147 Main Street East (henceforth referred to as 147 Main St. E) against the criteria for the Ontario Heritage Act for designation under Section 29, Part IV of the Act. Research was undertaken by consulting primary and secondary sources, and site visits were undertaken to evaluate the dwelling and take photographs. Currently, this building is the site of Cole’s Florist.

1.1 REPORT LIMITATIONS

The limitations of this report are based on missing information from the time this structure was constructed in the late 1800s to early 1900s. During the production of this report various information was required and unfortunately based on the age of the structure and lack of documentation we were unable to identify the following:

1. Date of Construction; 2. Name of Architect or Builder; and 3. Based on the current placement of the home and the lack of building foundation relocation potentially occurred however no documentation of the relocation has been discovered.

Note: Exterior analysis only

2.0 STUDY APPROACH

The analysis of this report was completed using the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. During the analysis, the following was prepared:

1. Description of Property; 2. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest; 3. Description of Heritage Attributes; and 4. Legal Description.

2.1 DEFINITIONS & ABBREVATIONS

2.2.1 Abbreviations

CHL- Cultural Heritage Landscape

GPS- Global Positioning System

HG&B- Hamilton Grimsby and Beamsville Electric Railway

ICOMOS- International Council on Monuments and Sites

LPAT- Local Planning Appeal Tribunal

MHR- Municipal Heritage Register

MHSTCI- Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries

4 Page 118 of 198 NHSC- National Historic Site of Canada

NTS- National Topographic Systems

OBC- Ontario Building Code

OHA- Ontario Heritage Act

OP- Official Plan

O. Reg 9/06 – Ontario Regulation 9/06- Criteria for determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.

Section 29- Part IV- Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act is the designation of a heritage property.

Section 29- Part V- Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act is the designation of a heritage conservation district.

ZBL- Zoning Bylaw

2.2.2 Definitions

Adaptation: Modification of a heritage item to suit a proposed, compatible use.

Alter: “alter” means to change in any manner and includes to restore, renovate, repair or disturb and “alteration” has a corresponding meaning; (“transformer”, “transformation”)

Archaeology: A set of theories, methods and techniques for the study of human culture and civilization, using scientific investigation of physical remains of past activities. Archaeological Resource: All tangible evidence of human activity that is of historical, cultural or scientific interest. Examples include features, structures, archaeological objects or remains at or from an archaeological site, or an object recorded as an isolated archaeological find.

Archaeological Sites: A place or area where tangible evidence of human activity of historical, cultural or scientific interest is or was located on, above or below the ground, whether submerged or not. The identification, recovery and interpretation of this evidence can be carried out using archaeological research methods.

Artefacts: Any object manufactured, used, moved or otherwise modified by human beings, including all waste materials and by-products of these processes.

Attribute: A property or quality of any archaeological object such as the length of a projectile point, the hardness of a potsherd or the colour of a bottle fragment.

Built Heritage Resources: a building, structure, monument, installation or any manufactured remnant that contributes to a property's cultural heritage value or interest as identified by a community, including an Aboriginal Indigenous community.

5 Page 119 of 198 Built heritage resources are generally located on property that has been designated under Parts lV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act, or included on local, provincial and/or federal registers.

Character-defining elements: The materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings that contribute to the heritage value of a historic place, and which must be retained in order to preserve its heritage value.

Construction date: The date of construction of the historic place (may be approximate).

Conservation: All actions or processes that are aimed at safeguarding the fundamental characteristics of a cultural resource in order to preserve its heritage value and extend its physical life. This may involve “preservation,” “rehabilitation,” “restoration” or a combination of these actions or processes.

Consultation: The term public consultation refers to the two-way process of providing and seeking information and advice from the general public, governments, Aboriginal peoples, interest groups and others on the management of protected heritage places. Consultation is only one of the many aspects of the overall public engagement.

Culture: The concept of culture can be defined as the “set of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual and emotional features of society or a social group” encompassing,“ in addition to art and literature, lifestyles, ways of living together, value systems, traditions and beliefs.”

Cultural Heritage Landscapes; a defined geographical area that may have been modified by human activity and is identified as having cultural heritage value or interest by a community, including an Aboriginal indigenous community. The area may involve features such as structures, spaces, archaeological sites or natural elements that are valued together for their interrelationship, meaning or association. Examples may include, but are not limited to, heritage conservation districts designated under the Ontario Heritage Act; villages, parks, gardens, battlefields, main streets and neighbourhoods, cemeteries, trail ways, view sheds, natural areas and industrial complexes of heritage significance; and areas recognized by federal or international designation authorities (e.g. a National Historic Site or District designation, or a UNESCO World Heritage Site).

Demolition: The damaging, defacing, destroying or dismantling of a heritage item or a component of a heritage conservation area, in whole or in part.

Façade: The face of a building; an architectural drawing of the vertical projection of the face of a building.

Guidelines: Statements that provide practical guidance in applying the Standards for the conservation of historic places. They are presented here in a format that provides recommended and non-recommend actions.

6 Page 120 of 198 Heritage Attribute: “heritage attributes” means, in relation to real property, and to the buildings and structures on the real property, the attributes of the property, buildings and structures that contribute to their cultural heritage value or interest

Heritage Fabric: All the physical material of an item, including surroundings and contents which contribute to its heritage significance.

Historic Place: A structure, building, group of buildings, district, landscape, archaeological site or other place in Canada that has been formally recognized for its heritage value by an appropriate authority within a jurisdiction.

Heritage Resource: A Heritage Area or any natural or cultural features associated with heritage areas or potential Areas.

Historical Value: The aesthetic, historic, scientific, cultural, social or spiritual importance or significance for past, present or future generations. The heritage value of a historic place is embodied in its character-defining materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings.

Inspect: “inspect” includes to survey, photograph, measure and record

Microfilm: A length of film containing microphotographs of documents.

Owner: means the person registered on title in the proper land registry office as owner.

Place: A site, area or landscape or group of works, together with associated structures, contents and surrounds.

Preservation: The action or process of protecting, maintaining and/or stabilizing the existing materials, form and integrity of a historic place, or of an individual component, while protecting its heritage value.

Protected Heritage Property: property designated under Parts lV, V or Vl of the Ontario Heritage Act; property subject to a heritage conservation easement under Parts ll or lV of the Ontario Heritage Act; property identified by the Province and prescribed public bodies as provincial heritage property under the Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties; property protected under federal legislation, and UNESCO World Heritage Sites.

Rarity: An item having this value is significant because it represents a rare, endangered or unusual aspect of our history or cultural heritage.

Reconstruction: Returning a place as nearly as possible to a known earlier state by the introduction of new or old materials into the fabric.

Rehabilitation: The action or process of making possible a continuing or compatible contemporary use for a historic place, or of an individual component, through repair, alterations and/or additions, while protecting its heritage value.

7 Page 121 of 198 Restoration: The action or process of accurately revealing, recovering or representing the state of a historic place, or of an individual component, as it appeared at a particular period in its history, while protecting its heritage value.

Tribunal: means the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal

2.2 METHODOLOGY

This report follows a three-step approach to understanding and planning for cultural heritage resources:

•Understanding the heritage planning regulatory framework;

•Understanding the significance of heritage resource (known and potential); and,

•Understanding the existing conditions of the property.

This is consistent with the recommended methodology outlined by the Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries (MHSTCI) within its 2006 publication Heritage Property Evaluation. The MHSTCI identifies three key steps: Historical Research, Site Analysis, and Evaluation. This was augmented with a policy analysis to outline the provincial and local policy contexts.

2.3 LEGISLATIVE POLICY

In the Province of Ontario, the process for determining cultural heritage value is prescribed via O. Reg. 9/06 of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). Further, in order to better understand the local context for evaluation of cultural heritage value or interest under the OHA, it must be determined if there are any supplemental municipal approaches or priorities that augment the provincially established process. For example, a municipality can build on the criteria of O.Reg. 9/06 by using adopted thematic history; identifying specific views in its Official Plan; or by adopting an evaluative template. The legislative and policy framework for this report is presented in Section 3 below.

3.0 POLICY FRAMEWORK

The following provincial and municipal policy documents direct the conservation of heritage sites and architectural attributes:

1. Provincial Policy Statement (2020) 2. Regional Official Plan 3. Town of Grimsby Official Plan

3.1 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT (2020)

The following provisions from the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) pertain to Cultural Heritage:

8 Page 122 of 198 2.6.1 Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved.

2.6.3 Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.

2.6.5 Planning authorities shall consider the interests of Aboriginal communities in conserving cultural heritage and archaeological resources.

3.2 REGIONAL OFFICAL PLAN

The following provisions from the Regional Official Plan pertain to Cultural Heritage:

Policy 10.C.2.1.1 Significant built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved using the provisions of the Heritage Act, the Planning Act, the Environmental Assessment Act, the Funeral, Burial and Cremations Act and the Municipal Act.

Policy 10.C.2.1.2 The Region shares an interest in the protection and conservation of significant built heritage resources and encourages local municipalities to develop policies to protect and conserve locally significant built heritage resources and to utilize its authority under the Ontario Heritage Act to designate individual properties, cultural heritage landscapes and heritage conservation districts that are of cultural heritage value or interest.

Policy 10.C.2.1.3 Municipalities are encouraged to establish a Municipal Heritage Committee (MHC) to advise and assist Council on matters related to Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act. Local Councils may expand the role of this committee to advise and assist Local Councils on other matters of cultural heritage conservation.

Policy 10.C.2.1.4 Public works projects and plans undertaken or reviewed by the Region, where in the vicinity of significant built and/ or cultural heritage landscapes will be designed in a sensitive manner and will provide appropriate mitigation measures in both design and location to conserve, enhance and complement the existing significant built and/ or cultural heritage resources.

Policy 10.C.2.1.5 Where development, site alteration and/ or a public works project is proposed on or adjacent to a significant built heritage resource(s) or cultural heritage landscapes , a heritage impact assessment will be required. The findings of the assessment shall include recommendations for design alternatives and satisfactory measures to mitigate any negative impacts on identified significant heritage resources.

Policy 10.C.2.1.6 The Region encourages local municipalities to establish Cultural Heritage Landscapes policies in their official plans and identify Significant Cultural Heritage Landscapes for designation. The purpose of this designation is to conserve groupings of features (buildings, structures, spaces, archaeological sites and natural

9 Page 123 of 198 elements) with heritage attributes that, together form a significant type of heritage form, distinctive from that of its constituent elements or parts.

Policy 10.C.2.1.7 The local municipalities shall adopt official plan policies to conserve significant cultural heritage resources and ensure that development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected properties will conserve the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property.

Policy 10.C.2.1.8 The Region will assist local municipalities with the preparation of Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation Plans for Significant Cultural Heritage Landscapes that cross municipal boundaries or are of Regional interest.

Policy 10.C.2.1.9 The Region, in collaboration with local municipalities, will prepare and maintain a Regional Implementation Guideline for Significant Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation.

3.3 TOWN OF GRIMSBY OFFICAL PLAN

The following provisions from the Town of Grimsby Official Plan pertain to Cultural Heritage:

8.18 Development and site alteration may be permitted on in the vicinity of protected heritage property where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.

Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches may be required in order to conserve the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property affected by the adjacent development or site alteration.

10 Page 124 of 198 4.0 PROPERTY CONTEXT

4.1 Property Location

The subject site is located at 147 Main Street East seen in Figure 1 below highlighted in yellow. The property is situated on Main Street East between Nelles Road North and Wentworth Drive.

FIGURE 1: The subject site at 147 Main Street East, Grimsby, Ontario as indicated by the yellow outline. Source: GIMS 2019.

4.2 Property Context

The heritage property is located along the Main Street historic corridor. This historic corridor is illustrated below based on the following contextual attributes:

The historic Main Street corridor was identified as a significant Cultural Heritage Landscape in 2015. The Main Street East corridor is of cultural heritage value as an intact historic 19th and early 20th Century agricultural landscape of the tender fruit farming industry. Situated midway between the Escarpment and Lake Ontario, Farms stretched both north and south. The shape of the farms was generally long and narrow as a result of landscape features and the original survey pattern. This resulted in farm dwellings being situated in relatively close proximity forming a near urban environment. The Quality and scale of the Architecture on this stretch of Main Street is testament to the prosperity of the tender fruit farming industry and the fertility of the land. The construction date of most of the houses is in the late 1800s and early 1900s an indication of the prosperity that came with the arrival of the Hamilton Grimsby and Beamsville Electric Railway in 1894. A defining feature of the landscape are the distinctive fruit barns. Many of the original fruit barns still survive to this day, located just

11 Page 125 of 198 to the rear of the houses. A landmark of the area is the Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates, a memorial to the local men and women who died in the First World War. The gate is constructed of local red limestone. It is a reminder of the significance of the conflict on the community which saw many local families affected.

Description of Heritage Attributes

Key attributes of the Main Street East corridor Cultural Heritage Landscape that reflect its value as an important link to the history of Grimsby include:

1. 19th and early 20th Century Residential Architecture; 2. Mature Trees; 3. Fruit Barns; 4. Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates; 5. Centennial Park (1967) view to the Niagara Escarpment; and 6. Backdrop view towards the Niagara Escarpment.

The property at 147 Main Street East contributes to the following of the above- mentioned attributes of the historic Main Street East corridor Cultural Heritage Landscape:

 This property contributes to the 19th and early 20th century residential architectural style that is historically found along the corridor.

 Unfortunately, over time, the mature trees and (potential) fruit barn have been removed from the site.

 The Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates, Centennial Park (view of escarpment) and backdrop view towards the Niagara Escarpment does not apply to this site, thus this property is not contributing to the significance of these particular attributes.

5.0 SITE ANALYSIS

5.1 Existing Condition

The site currently consists of the following structures:

1. Historic two-storey converted dwelling; and 2. Large greenhouse.

The site currently consists of the following landscaping:

1. Parking lot; and 2. Area surrounding parking lot is landscaped with gardens and trees

12 Page 126 of 198 6.0 HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY

6.1 Site Development

This property is identified as belonging to J.A Nelles on the 1862 Tremaine Map, and JWG Around 1876 Nelles in the 1876 Historic Atlas Map. The house is known as the Beamer House. J.E Beamer is identified as the owner of the northwest corner of Lot 6. Concession 2 in the 1876 country Atlas Map.1

1907 NTS map shows a building in this location2

1913 Benjamin Cook

1913 James S. Cook

1914 Jonathan A. Book

1918 Jane Pettit

Harriett Biggar 1918 1944 Jane Pettit 1946 Jeanne Hodson to Elise Rutherford 1971 Norman Cole to Boyd Prentice

3 Boyd Prentice to Norman Cole

1986 After 96 years of family ownership, Cole’s Florists was sold to Harry and Nancy DeVries. After 10 days of the purchase, Cole’s Florists was moved across the street to its current location on the subject property.4

1999 Parking lot is expanded 2001 Cole’s Florists undergoes renovations to the flower shop, and a second floor consultation area was added in addition to accessibility upgrades. 2002 Harry DeVries purchased the Brass and Wicker House at 141 Main Street East. With the purchase of this neighboring property, Cole’s Florists continued to expand. In October, the

Brass and Wicker House became the Cole’s Christmas cottage.

6.2 Development of Main Street East

Over the last 150 years the historic Main Street East corridor has seen substantial changes which are depicted below through several maps. The earliest map below depicts the street as early as 1862, and in the later maps it is evident that this streetscape has changed significantly, as the street has developed over time. Large brick and sided buildings began to fill vacant parcels, this precedent produced a substantial corridor which was developed using similar materials and in exchange created a cohesive streetscape. The 1975 map depicts the older structures that were prominent along the streetscape for over one-hundred years, however comparison of this

1 Atlas of Lincoln & Welland 2 NTS Map- Source: Department of Militia and Defense 3 Title Search – Land Registry Office 4 Grimsby Archives- Coles Florist

13 Page 127 of 198 historical mapping to the current condition indicates that several of the original homes have been replaced with strip malls with substantial demolition of historic structures within the last 50 years. The heritage structures that remain along this streetscape are important vestiges of this cultural heritage landscape.

Figure: 3 - 1871 Patent Plan for Grimsby Township Figure: 4 - 1862 Tremaine Map – Source: Tremaine 1862

Figure: 5 - 1876 County Atlas Map Source: McGill Figure: 6 - 1907 NTS Maps University Source: Department of Militia and Defense

14 Page 128 of 198

Figure: 7 - 1923 NTS Maps Figure: 8 - 1929 NTS Maps Source: Department of Militia and Defense Source: Department of Militia and Defense

Figure: 9 - 1934 NTS Maps Figure: 10 - 1938 NTS Maps Source: Department of Militia and Defense Source: Department of Militia and Defense

Figure: 11 - 1934 Aerial Photograph Source: Google Earth

15 Page 129 of 198 3 Contextual Photographs

Current Cole’s Florist

Original Location of Cole’s Florist

1975 Map showing demolished structures along Main Street East, outlined in yellow. Source: Grimsby Archives

Existing Cole’s Florist

2019 Map showing existing remaining historical structures along this section of Main Street East, circled in yellow. Source: Grimsby Archives

16 Page 130 of 198 .

Current Cole’s Florist Buildings (remaining in 2019, see below)

Pictured above are the demolished historical structures along Main Street East. The property currently occupied by Cole’s Florist located at 147 Main St E is representative of the vernacular architectural style that was historically found along this historic Main Street corridor. The below image depicts the current conditions (2019) to illustrate the contrast between the historical streetscape and the remaining components of this historical streetscape.

Source: Grimsby Archives

Current Cole’s Florist Buildings

Pictured above are the remaining historical structures along Main Street East (2019). The properties currently occupied by Cole’s Florist located at 147 Main St E are representative of the vernacular architectural style that was historically found along this historic Main Street corridor. This image is contrasted with the above image which illustrates the historical streetscape.

Source: Town of Grimsby - September 2019

17 Page 131 of 198 Pictured beside and below are contextual photographs of the Main Street East corridor. The first image taken in 1990 can be compared to the photographs of the same location on Main Street taken in 2019. Significant heritage structures have been demolished over the last 29 years with 147 Main Street East being one of the few remaining structures along this streetscape.

Pictured beside and below are contextual photographs of the Main Street East corridor. The first image taken in 1990 can be compared to the photographs of the same location on Main Street taken in 2019 (Grimsby Archives)

18 Page 132 of 198 6.4 Elevations of Site

South Side of Coles Florist – Google Maps 2018

West Side of Coles Florist – Google Maps 2018

19 Page 133 of 198 6.5 Site Description

Double Hung Sash Windows With shutters East Side of Coles Florist – Google Maps 2018

The timber frame structure located at 147 Main Street East stands two-storeys high with a flat deck hipped roof, the roof line is traced with bracketed eaves. The hipped roof is intersected by a single brick chimney on the west elevation. Bay windows can be found on both the East and South elevations. The window openings found throughout the structure are flat-topped, and currently have double hung sash windows with one over one pane division. Some of the windows feature awnings and louvered shutters. The structure is covered in a blue colored vinyl vertical siding.

20 Page 134 of 198 6.5. 1 Site Visit - 147 Main St East -

Awning

Bay Window

Bay Window

Bracketed Eaves

Original Window

Openings

Evidence of original wood siding under existing vinyl siding

During the site visit of 147 Main Street East, staff was able to identify original bracketed eaves, original openings, and under the vinyl siding, there is evidence of the original wood siding. The extent of the remaining wood siding is unknown without the removal of the vinyl siding; however, whatever portions of the wooden siding remain are considered to be a significant attribute.

21 Page 135 of 198 6.6 Historical Information

During the historical research of this structure the following information was collected. Some of this information is directly associated with the structure, as well additional historical information pertaining to the original Cole’s Florist and the family associated with Cole’s Florist.

6.6.1 History of Beamer Family (Owners of the Property - J.E Beamer)

J.E Beamer is identified as the owner of the northwest corner of Lot 6. Concession 2 in the 1876 country Atlas Map.5 The Beamer family came to Grimsby in 1790 from Philadelphia. John Beamer was the first descendant of the family to come to Grimsby. John purchased a large parcel of land on the escarpment next to a waterfall mill which is known today as Beamer Falls. John acquired a considerable amount of land which he gave to his sons John and William to farm. John married Anna Young and had a son William who served in the 4th Lincoln Regiment during the Rebellion of 1837 and was on the Grimsby Township Council for a number of years, beginning in 1834. J.E Beamer is a descendent of the Beamer family that came to Grimsby in 1790. 6

6.6.2 History of Book Family - (Owner of the property -Jonathon Ambrose Book)

The Book family can likely be traced back to Conrad Book. Conrad and his family came to Upper Canada in 1797. It appears that Conrad had been close acquaintances with the Larason and Pettit families in New Jersey before they had arrived in Canada. Upon arriving to Upper Canada, Conrad and his family had stayed with the Pettit family.

In 1798, Conrad bought a farm by the lake from Lawrence Larason. Lawrence Larason was the son-in-law of Nathaniel Pettit.

Conrad and his family were actively involved in the community. Conrad was the overseer of roads in the Township, and this was a role that was passed on to Conrad’s second son Mathias.

FIGURE 11: Book Family Homestead Source: Annals of the Forty – Book Family

5 Atlas of Lincoln & Welland 6 Annals of the Forty – Beamer Family

22 Page 136 of 198 Mathias inherited the family farm by the lake where he would later raise his family. Mathias served on the Grimsby Council for many years and built the Acacia Homestead for his son along Main Street. The Acacia homestead remained in the family for 166 years until 1972, when the homestead was demolished to make way for Bartlett Avenue.

Mathias Book had a son in 1821 named William Book. William inherited the north part of Lot 2 and the old homestead on the lakeshore. William married Sophia Stevenson (Anderson) in 1848. Sophia was the granddaughter of Charles Anderson.

Charles Anderson was a young Irishman that moved to Canada in 1788. Charles was married to the only daughter of Major Henry Nelles. Charles was always active in the affairs of “the Forty” (the original name for the settlement in Grimsby). His name first appears as a member of Township Council in 1793 as one of the two overseers of roads. In 1798 he was Collector and thereafter held various offices on the Council and many of the early meetings were held at his house 7. William and Sophia had six children one of which was named Jonathon Ambrose Book.

Jonathon Ambrose Book was born in 1854 in Grimsby. In 1879 he married Eliza Hart Kemp and they went on to have two children. Jonathon lived in both Lincoln and Grimsby until his death in 1932. During his life in Grimsby he was a local fruit farmer8 and owned the house at 147 Main St E from 1918 until 19239.

6.6.3 History of Pettit- (Owner of the Property – Jane Pettit)

Jane Pettit’s name appears on the title search of the property in 1918 and 1944. Jane Pettit then sold the historic home to Harriet Anna Mabel Pettit Biggar in 1918 making Harriet the second Pettit family member to live in the house. Harriet Biggar was known for her famous chocolate candy shop in the historic home during the early 20th Century.

The Pettit family were as significant as the Nelles Family in the Grimsby Township, and they too were United Empire Loyalists. Andrew and John Pettit came to Canada in 1787 and then eventually settled at “the Forty”. Andrew was a supporter of the Church of England, and was monumental in the establishment of St. Andrew’s Church in the Grimsby Township. The new stone church was erected after Andrew’s death and it is suggested in the Annals of the Forty that St. Andrew’s Church was most likely named in honour of him. Andrew was also the Clerk on the Grimsby Township Council from 1792 until his death in 1819. All Council meeting minutes are recorded in his handwriting. 10

6.6.4 History of Biggar (Owner of the property - Harriet Biggar)

Harriet Biggar ran a chocolate shop at 147 Main St E, Harriet’s Homemade Hand Dipped Chocolates, which brought customers from afar. Harriet used a portion of the large home

7 People and Places of Grimsby’s Past – Book & Annals of the Forty - No. 2 – Book 8 1921 Census of Canada 9 Title Search – 147 Main St W- Land registry office 10 The Streets of Grimsby from A-W

23 Page 137 of 198 for the production of her candy. Local people and tourists were her customers but she also sent away many pounds of her fine candy to fill mail orders.11

Harriet Anna Mabel Pettit Biggar was born is 1879 in Winona. Harriet married James David Biggar in 1904. James David Biggar was a descendant of the Biggar family. The Biggar family were early settlers to “the Forty” in the late 18th century.

James Biggar was born in Northern Ireland as his forefathers were forced out of Scotland for their religious beliefs. James then moved to Philadelphia in 1730. James married Martha Fleming and had three sons. Two of James and Martha’s sons married into the Pettit family. During the War of 1812 James and Martha’s son John Biggar served alongside his three sons in the West Lincoln Regiment. John then went on to remarry and have a total of twenty sons. Many of the Biggar family is buried at St. Andrew’s Church Cemetery.12

6.6.5 History of Cole’s Family (Family of Norman Cole – previous homeowner)

In 1885 Albert Edward Cole returned to Grimsby. He had previously owned several unsuccessful lots in Weston. Upon arriving in Grimsby, Albert opened a small garden nursery. Albert found his inspiration to start this business after visiting Dale Estates in Brampton, one of the world’s largest nursery operations. With a passion for growing vegetables and flowers, Albert started to grow an English garden and was able to sell his lettuce and tomatoes to the hotels at Grimsby Beach. Albert continued to grow his business with the addition of a 1000 sq. ft. greenhouse. With this greenhouse expansion, produce was able to be grown year-round indoors. 13

11 Once upon a Little Town – The Wheels of Industry 12 Annals of the Forty – Biggar Family 13 Grimsby Archives – Anniversary Article

24 Page 138 of 198

In 1900, Albert married Annie Spiers. Annie Spiers was the granddaughter of a Spanish War and War of 1812 veteran Trumpeter Blakely. Trumpeter fought under General Brock at the battle of Queenston Heights.14 Albert and Annie met at a camera shop in Grimsby, owned by Albert’s uncle. The couple purchased a property at 150-152 Main St E. The property had a brick house which was originally constructed in 1855 and had a unique brick pattern. The property consisted of five acres of land. An additional greenhouse was added to the property in 1912 from a St. Catherine’s company known as Lord and Burnham. With the additional greenhouse, the couple started to grow violets and vegetables. In 1914, this greenhouse was destroyed by a major hailstorm. A new greenhouse was added to the property in 1929. Over the years Cole’s became the largest florist operation between Toronto and Niagara Falls. 15 Cole’s Florist and Grimsby Beach had a unique connection during the early 1900’s. Albert sold his produce to the two largest hotels located in Grimsby Beach. He later continued supplying the community with fresh produce every Saturday at the Grimsby Beach Market. Albert expected and encouraged his young children to be actively involved in the family business, however after a long week the boys would be encouraged to head down to the beach. They happily enjoyed the roller coaster and entertainment attractions along the midway strip. The Cole boys often found themselves at the beach selling bunches of radishes. The family was instrumental in the success of Cole’s. Every family member participated in the business and played an important role. Having a greenhouse in these days was very difficult and exhausting. Norman, the oldest son, often stayed the night with his father while he heated the greenhouses with coal-fed boilers. The hard work never seemed to end. When it came to deliveries in those days there was only three options, by foot, horse and buggy or street cars. Norman Cole often found himself riding the street car, making deliveries for his parents and on many occasions, Norman would deliver flowers for his father’s regular customer Senator Gibson. Norman was a young and creative child and often traded a carnation for his ride, keeping the street car fare for the midway or candy. In 1914 life would get a little easier as the family purchased their first delivery truck. The first delivery was to the Liddle family of Grimsby. The successful business continued to grow, and by 1930 the Cole family owned more than 25,000 square feet of greenhouse. With such a large expansion and the passing of Annie, it was time for A. E. Cole to bring his sons into the business full time. The sons were significant contributors supporting the demand for deliveries, floral arrangement and maintenance. The Cole’s boys showed great interest in the family business and by 1932 the three of them had purchased the business from their father. After the Cole’s boys married, their spouses became instrumental in the success of the business, especially Norman’s wife Elizabeth.

14 Annie Cole (Nee Spiers) Obituary – Grimsby Public Library 15 Grimsby Archives – Anniversary Article

25 Page 139 of 198 Along with having an expanded greenhouse business, Albert had rental property at 91 Main Street East. The large brick home was divided into apartments and later sold to A.E’s daughter Mildred and her husband, with the agreement that Albert would always have a place to stay. 16

Cole’s Apartments 91 Main Street Grimsby Cole’s Florist continued to expand. In 1957, a store front was constructed at the entrance of the property. Along with an expanding business the Cole’s family grew once again as Albert welcomed many grandchildren. The grandchildren were encouraged to help wherever things were lacking. In 1962 after the passing of John Cole, Norman and Elizabeth Cole bought out Gordon’s shares in the company. Norman and Elizabeth often spoke of their business trips to the American Carnation Societies Convention each year. In 1972 Norman purchased the home at 147 Main Street East now known as Cole’s Florist (the subject property). In 1986 Norman, 84 and Elizabeth, 78 retired and the company was sold to someone outside the Cole’s family; Harry and Nancy DeVries.

Elizabeth and Norman working at Cole’s 1984- Grimsby Achieves

16 Grimsby Archives – Anniversary Article

26 Page 140 of 198 The DeVries acknowledge and understand the long history of the Cole family and the significance of this landmark business over the last 100 years. Mr. DeVries once said “It is certainly one of the oldest existing businesses in Grimsby and along with that comes a lot of tradition”. The DeVries family had their fair share of experience in the greenhouses and nursery business already owning Lincoln Florist in Smithville. After the sale of Cole’s Florist to them, the DeVries decided to move the business across the street from its original location at 150-152 Main Street East to 147 Main St E (the subject property). 17

Harry Devries at the new Grimsby and Stoney Creek locations – Grimsby Archives After this move, the DeVries’ renovated 147 Main Street E. The existing structure was expanded by 1200 sq. ft. The addition was made to the older existing home. The intention of this design choice was to mimic the original Cole’s style that many people had grown to love. With an effort to serve their customers more effectively, the DeVries’ tore down the yellow cottage next door and built a 3000 sq. ft. greenhouse structure. The business continued to flourish and required an addition 1200 sq. ft. addition for storage and deliveries along with additional space for floral design workshops. Finally in 1991 the renovations were completed with a new roof, siding, windows and landscaping added to the site in time for the 100 anniversary celebration of Cole’s Florists. 18

17 Grimsby Archives – Anniversary Article 18 Grimsby Archives – Anniversary Article

27 Page 141 of 198 Grimsby Archives

Over the years, Cole’s Florist has evolved from the humble beginnings of horse and buggy delivery service to a national online purchasing company with the ability to ship all over North America.

History of Cole’s Florist (Normal Cole son of Albert Edward Cole lived in 147 Main St E)

Year Event Albert Edward Cole returned to Grimsby and started growing flowers and vegetables. From his 1885 English garden, lettuce and tomatoes were sold to the hotels at Grimsby Beach Park. 19

Albert Edward Cole established Cole’s Florist. Albert constructed a 1,000 sq. ft. greenhouse on the 1891 former sawmill and started growing violets and vegetables.20

The greenhouse is expanded to 25,000 sq. ft. 1930

1932 The business is purchased by Cole’s sons John, Gordon and Norman.

Norman and his wife Elizabeth become sole owners. 1957

1986 After 96 years of family ownership, Cole’s was sold to Harry and Nancy DeVries. 10 days after the purchase, Coles was moved across the street to its current location. 21 1991 Cole’s Florist’s Stoney Creek location opens. 1999 Parking lot is expanded 2001 Coles under goes renovations to the flower shop and a second floor consultation area was added in addition to accessibility upgrades. 2002 Harry purchased the Brass and Wicker House next door at 141 Main Street East. With the purchase of the neighboring property, Cole’s continued to expand.

2006 Cole’s Garden Décor opens across the street.

19 Niagara this week – Coles 20 Coles Website

28 Page 142 of 198

Original Location of Cole’s Florist at 150-152 Main St East– Grimsby Archives

Original Location of Cole’s Florist at 150-152 Main St East– Grimsby Archives

29 Page 143 of 198 7.0 EVALUATION

7.1 Assessment of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest

A property may be designated under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act if it meets one or more of the following criteria for determining whether it is of cultural heritage value or interest

7.2 The property has design value or physical value because it:

Meets O. Reg. 9/06 Criteria Criteria Summary (Y/N)

1. The property has design value or physical value because it,

i) Is a rare, unique, representative or Yes The property located at 147 Main Street East, is a early example of a style, type, representation of the Italianate architectural style that was expression, and material or prevalent within the historic Grimsby Landscape. With the construction method substantial demolition of many historic structures and the development of plazas, 147 Main St E acts as one of the few remaining buildings of this scale, mass and form along this streetscape. The timber frame structure located at 147 Main Street East stands two storeys high with a flat deck hipped roof traced with ornate bracketed eaves. The hipped roof is intersected by a single brick chimney on the west elevation. Bay windows can be found on both the East and South elevations. The window openings found throughout the structure are flat topped, and currently have double hung sash windows with one over one pane division. 147 Main Street East is covered in a blue colored vinyl vertical siding with evidence of the original wood siding underneath.

ii) Displays a high degree of No Property does not display a high degree of craftsmanship craftsmanship or artistic merit or artistic merit

iii) Demonstrates a high degree of No Property does not demonstrate a high degree of technical technical or scientific or scientific achievement achievement

7.3 The property has historical value or associative value because it,

2. The property has historical value as of associative value because it,

i) Has direct associations with a theme, Yes The home at 147 Main St. E was built circa 1907 on the event, belief, person, activity, property originally owned by J.A Nelles. The building has organization or institution that is significance for its association with prominent historical significant to a community. individuals associated with significant families in Grimsby’s history including the Nelles, Beamer, Biggar, Book, Pettit and Cole families.

J.A Nelles originally owned the land on which 147 Main St. E is situated. The Nelles family was a prominent family in the Grimsby Township and was among the first to come to the Forty. J.E Beamer is identified as the owner of the northwest corner of Lot 6. Concession 2 as well as owner of the home at 147 Main St E identified in

30 Page 144 of 198 the 1876 country Atlas Map. J.E Beamer is a descendent of the Beamer family that came to Grimsby in 1790.

Jane Pettit’s name appears on the title search of the property in 1918 and 1944. The Pettit family were just as significant as the Nelles Family in the Grimsby Township; they too were United Empire Loyalists. Andrew and John Pettit came to Canada in 1787 and then eventually settled at the Forty. Jane Pettit then sold the historic home to Harriet Anna Mabel Pettit Biggar in 1918 making Harriet the second Pettit family member to live in the house at 147 Main Street East. Harriet married James David Biggar in 1904, James David Biggar was a descendant of the Biggar family. The Biggar family were early settlers to the Forty in the late 18th century.

In 1918 the home was purchased by Jonathon Ambrose Book, Jonathon Book is a direct descendant of Conrad Book. Conrad Book and his family came to Upper Canada in 1797. Upon arriving in Upper Canada, Conrad and his family had stayed with the Pettit family.

Norman Edward Cole purchased the home in 1971. Norman was the son of Albert Edward Cole founder of Coles Florist. Norman bought the company from his father over 88 years ago. In 1986 the floral company “Cole’s Florist” moved into the historic dwelling, Cole’s Florist has been a company since 1891. At one point Cole’s florist had became the largest floral operation from Toronto to Niagara Falls, often supplying the Grimsby Beach hotels and market with flowers. Norman’s great grandfather was war veteran Trumpeter Blakely. Trumpeter served during the Spanish War and fought under General Brock at the battle of Queenston Heights in the War of 1812. ii) Yields, or has the potential to yield, No information that contributes to an Property does not yield, or have the potential to yield understanding of a community or information that contributes to an understanding of a culture, or community or culture, or iii) Demonstrates or reflects the work or No Property does not demonstrate or reflect the work or ideas of an architect, artist, ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist builder, designer or theorist who who sis significant to a community is significant to a community.

7.4 The property has contextual value because it,

3. The property has contextual value because it, i) Is important in defining, maintaining Yes 147 Main Street East is important in supporting the or supporting the character of an character of the historic Main Street corridor. With the area, removal of many wood frame structures, 147 Main Street East is one of the few remaining structures that is representative of the vernacular architectural style that was historically found along this historic streetscape. ii) Is physically, functionally, visually or No Property is not physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its historically linked to its surroundings, or surroundings, or

31 Page 145 of 198 iii) Is a landmark. No Property is not a landmark.

7.5 CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST

“The statement of cultural heritage value or interest, including a description of the heritage attributes along with all other components of the Heritage Designation Brief constitute the "Reasons for the Designation" required under the Ontario Heritage Act. The Heritage Designation Brief is available for viewing in the Town Planning Department during regular business hours.”

7.6 STATEMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST

The property located at 147 Main Street East, is a representation of the Italianate architectural style that was prevalent within the historic Grimsby Landscape. With the substantial demolition of many historic structures and the development of plazas, 147 Main St E acts as one of the few remaining buildings of this scale, mass and form along this streetscape. The timber frame structure located at 147 Main Street East stands two storeys high with a flat deck hipped roof traced with ornate bracketed eaves. The hipped roof is intersected by a single brick chimney on the west elevation. Bay windows can be found on both the East and South elevations. The window openings found throughout the structure are flat topped, and currently have double hung sash windows with one over one pane division. 147 Main Street East is covered in a blue colored vinyl vertical siding with evidence of the original wood siding underneath.

The home at 147 Main St. E was built circa 1907 on the property originally owned by J.A Nelles. The building has significance for its association with prominent historical individuals associated with significant families in Grimsby’s history including the Nelles, Beamer, Biggar, Book, Pettit and Cole families.

J.A Nelles originally owned the land on which 147 Main St. E is situated. The Nelles family was a prominent family in the Grimsby Township and was among the first to come to the Forty. J.E Beamer is identified as the owner of the northwest corner of Lot 6. Concession 2 as well as owner of the home at 147 Main St E identified in the 1876 country Atlas Map. J.E Beamer is a descendent of the Beamer family that came to Grimsby in 1790.

Jane Pettit’s name appears on the title search of the property in 1918 and 1944. The Pettit family were just as significant as the Nelles Family in the Grimsby Township, they too were United Empire Loyalists. Andrew and John Pettit came to Canada in 1787 and then eventually settled at the Forty. Jane Pettit then sold the historic home to Harriet Anna Mabel Pettit Biggar in 1918 making Harriet the second Pettit family member to live in the house at 147 Main Street East. Harriet married James David Biggar in 1904, James David Biggar was a descendant of the Biggar family. The Biggar family were early settlers to the Forty in the late 18th century.

In 1918 the home was purchased by Jonathon Ambrose Book. Jonathon Book is a direct descendant of Conrad Book. Conrad Book and his family came to Upper Canada in 1797. Upon arriving to Upper Canada Conrad and his family had stayed with the Pettit family.

Norman Edward Cole purchased the home in 1971. Norman was the son of Albert Edward Cole, founder of Cole’s Florist, established in 1891. Norman bought the company from his father in the early 20th century. In 1986, “Cole’s Florist” moved into the historic dwelling. At one point Cole’s florist had became the largest floral operation from Toronto to Niagara Falls, often supplying the Grimsby Beach hotels and market with flowers. Norman’s great grandfather was war veteran

32 Page 146 of 198 Trumpeter Blakely. Trumpeter served during the War of 1812, under General Brock at the battle of Queenston Heights, and the Spanish War.

147 Main Street East is important in supporting the character of the historic Main Street corridor. With the removal of many wood frame structures, 147 Main Street East is one of the few remaining structures that is representative of the vernacular architectural style that was historically found along this historic streetscape.

7.7 HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES TO BE DESIGNATED

The Heritage Attributes to be designated at 147 Main Street East include:

 Flat deck hipped roof  Bracketed eaves  Flat top window openings  Bay windows  Wood siding (under the current blue vinyl siding which was discovered during a site visit)

8.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

8.1 Summary

This report was prepared to assess the building at 147 Main Street East against the criteria for the Ontario Heritage Act for designation under Section 29, Part IV of the Act. Research was undertaken by consulting primary and secondary sources and site visits were undertaken to evaluate the dwelling and take photographs. The significant values of this structure have been determined in Section 7 of this report. The statement of cultural heritage value or interest is contained in Section 7.6. of this report, additionally the heritage attributes have been identified in Section 7.7. These attributes have been determined to merit designation as they contribute to the significance of the building, and as such should be outlined in the designation by-law as significant elements.

The limitations of this report are based on missing information from the time this structure was constructed in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s. During the production of this report various information was required and unfortunately based on the age of the structure the following was unable to be identified:

 Date of Construction;  Name of Architect or Builder;  Based on the current placement of the home and the lack of building foundation relocation potentially occurred however no documentation of the relocation has been discovered; and  Exterior analysis only.

The analysis of this report was completed in conjunction with the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. During the analysis the following was prepared:

 Description of Property;  Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest;  Description of Heritage Attributes; and

33 Page 147 of 198  Legal Description.

Policy framework has been created to ensure the conservation of heritage sites and architectural attributes. The following policies have been put in place from both the municipal and provincial level. These policies are as follows:

 Provincial Policy Statement (2020);  Regional Official Plan; and  Town of Grimsby Official Plan.

8.2 Findings

During the analysis of this report, the attributes and the architectural significance of this structure were identified. The evaluation determined that the strongest significance comes from the contextual value of the structure along the historic Main Street corridor. 147 Main St West is one of the few remaining historic wood frame structures along this portion of Main Street. In the early 1990’s several of the historic structures were demolished and replaced with a plaza, drugstore, dental office, Tim Hortons and bank. Based on the removal of so many large wood famed dwellings, the value of the remaining wood framed structures has increased. Based on the significant demolition of neighboring structures the remaining heritage buildings are critical in order to help depict early development along this streetscape. Additionally, through the analysis of this report it was discovered that significant families lived and owned this historic building during the last two centuries.

During the assessment of cultural heritage value or interest on this particular historic structure it was determined that this building meets 3 of the required criteria to be considered for designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

8.3 Recommendations

Based on the assessment of cultural heritage value or interest staff has recommended that this structure be designated under Part IV, section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

34 Page 148 of 198

HERITAGE Udell House RESEARCH 224 Main Street East October REPORT Grimsby, Ontario 2020

Page 149 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

INFORMATION SUMMARY

PROPERTY INFORMATION

Address: 224 Main Street East, Grimsby, ON, L3M 1P6

Roll Number: 261502001505800

Short Legal PT LT 4 CON 2, North Grimsby as in RO495389 ; GRIMSBY Description:

Heritage Status: Designated Under the Ontario Heritage Act

Name of Heritage Ice House Item: OWNER INFORMATION

Names of Owners: MARY PAULA COUTURIER

Owners Address: 224 MAIN ST E GRIMSBY, ON, CAN, L3M1P6

224 MAIN ST E GRIMSBY, ON, CAN, L3M1P6 Mailing Address:

REPORT INFORMATION

Report Purpose: Provide an evaluation of the potential cultural heritage value or interest of the property and provide recommendations on the actions for conservation.

Date: October 2020

Designation Brief Bianca Verrecchia, Assistant Heritage Planner Completed by: - Heritage Conservation Diploma– Williowbank School of Restoration Arts 2019 - Architectural Technologist Advanced Diploma – Mohawk College 2014

Antonietta Minichillo, MES, RPP, CAHP, Director of Planning, Building & By-Law

- Undergrad York University Geography and Urban Studies - Masters in Environmental Studies, Planning Stream, York University - Masters Thesis: The Economics of Heritage Preservation: A Case Study on the John Street Roundhouse

2 Page 150 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

Janice Hogg, MCIP, RPP, Senior Planner

- Bachelor of Environmental Studies, Honors Planning – University of Waterloo 2005 - Masters of Heritage Conservation – University of Sydney 2009

- Resources: Grimsby Archives,1791 Patent Plan Grimsby Township Land, 1862 Tremaine Map Lincoln and Welland County Map, Designation Report – Nelles Manor The streets of Grimsby – A-W, Barns, Sheds and Outbuildings: A practical Guide 1881, Virtual listings, GIMS

3 Page 151 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report was prepared to assess the buildings at 224 Main Street East against the criteria for the Ontario Heritage Act for designation under Section 29, Part IV of the Act. Research was undertaken by consulting primary and secondary sources and site visits were undertaken to evaluate the dwelling and take photographs. The Property at 224 Main Street East is currently designated under Section 29, Part IV of the Act.

1.1 REPORT LIMITATIONS

The limitations of this report are based on missing information from the time this structure was constructed in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s. During the production of this report various information was required and unfortunately based on the age of the structure and lack of documentation we were unable to identify the following:

1. Additional information about the house between 1855-1875.

Note: Exterior analysis only

2.0 STUDY APPROACH

The analysis of this report was completed with the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. During the analysis the following was prepared:

1. Description of Property 2. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest. 3. Description of Heritage Attributes and 4. Legal Description

3.0 POLICY FRAMEWORK

Policy framework has been created to ensure the conservation of heritage sites and architectural attributes. The following policies have been put in place from both the municipal and provincial level. These policies are as follows:

1. Provincial Policy Statement 2. Regional Official Plan 3. Town of Grimsby Official Plan

4 Page 152 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

3.1 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT

The following provisions are from the Provincial Policy Statement and pertains to Cultural Heritage.

2.6 Cultural heritage and archaeology

2.6.1 Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved.

2.6.3 Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.

2.6.5 Planning authorities shall engage with Indigenous communities and consider their interests when identifying, protecting and managing cultural heritage and archaeological resources.

3.2 REGIONAL OFFICAL PLAN

The following provisions are from the Regional Official Plan and pertains to Cultural Heritage.

10. C.2 Policies

10. C.2.1 -Built Heritage Resources, Cultural Heritage Landscapes and Archaeological Resources

Policy 10.C.2.1.1 Significant built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved using the provisions of the Heritage Act, the Planning Act, the Environmental Assessment Act, the Funeral, Burial and Cremations Act and the Municipal Act.

Policy 10.C.2.1.2 The Region shares an interest in the protection and conservation of significant built heritage resources and encourages local municipalities to develop policies to protect and conserve locally significant built heritage resources and to utilize its authority under the Ontario Heritage Act to designate individual properties, cultural heritage landscapes and heritage conservation districts that are of cultural heritage value or interest.

Policy 10.C.2.1.3 Municipalities are encouraged to establish a Municipal Heritage Committee (MHC) to advise and assist Council on matters related to Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act. Local Councils may expand the role of this committee to advise and assist Local Councils on other matters of cultural heritage conservation.

Policy 10.C.2.1.4 Public works projects and plans undertaken or reviewed by the Region, where in the vicinity of significant built and/ or cultural heritage landscapes will be designed in a sensitive manner and will provide appropriate mitigation

5 Page 153 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

measures in both design and location to conserve, enhance and complement the existing significant built and/ or cultural heritage resources.

Policy 10.C.2.1.5 Where development, site alteration and/ or a public works project is proposed on or adjacent to a significant built heritage resource(s) or cultural heritage landscapes , a heritage impact assessment will be required. The findings of the assessment shall include recommendations for design alternatives and satisfactory measures to mitigate any negative impacts on identified significant heritage resources.

Policy 10.C.2.1.6 The Region encourages local municipalities to establish Cultural Heritage Landscapes policies in their official plans and identify Significant Cultural Heritage Landscapes for designation. The purpose of this designation is to conserve groupings of features (buildings, structures, spaces, archaeological sites and natural elements) with heritage attributes that, together form a significant type of heritage form, distinctive from that of its constituent elements or parts.

Policy 10.C.2.1.7 The local municipalities shall adopt official plan policies to conserve significant cultural heritage resources and ensure that development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected properties will conserve the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property.

Policy 10.C.2.1.8 The Region will assist local municipalities with the preparation of Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation Plans for Significant Cultural Heritage Landscapes that cross municipal boundaries or are of Regional interest.

Policy 10.C.2.1.9 The Region, in collaboration with local municipalities, will prepare and maintain a Regional Implementation Guideline for Significant Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation.

3.3 TOWN OF GRIMSBY OFFICAL PLAN

The following provisions are from the Town of Grimsby Official Plan and pertains to Cultural Heritage.

8.0 CULTURAL HERITAGE AND ARCHAEOLOGY

8.18 Development and site alteration may be permitted on in the vicinity of protected heritage property where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.

Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches may be required in order to conserve the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property affected by the adjacent development or site alteration.

6 Page 154 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

4.0 PROPERTY CONTEXT

4.1 Property Location

The subject site is located at 224 Main Street East can be seen in Figure 1 below highlighted in yellow. The property is situated on Main Street East between Dorchester Drive and Baker Road South.

FIGURE 1: The subject site at 224 Main Street East, Grimsby, Ontario as indicated by the yellow outline. Source: GIMS

7 Page 155 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

4.2 Property Context

The heritage property is located along the Main Street historic corridor. This historic corridor is illustrated below based on the following contextual attributes:

The historic Main Street corridor is a Council identified significant Cultural Heritage Landscape. The Main Street East District is of cultural heritage value as an intact historic 19th and early 20th Century agricultural landscape of the tender fruit farming industry. Situated midway between the Escarpment and Lake Ontario, Farms stretched both north and south. The shape of the farms was generally long and narrow as a result of landscape features and the original survey pattern. This resulted in Farm dwellings being situated in relatively close proximity forming a near urban environment. The Quality and scale of the Architecture on this stretch of Main Street is testament to the prosperity of the tender fruit farming industry and the fertility of the land. The construction date of most of the houses is in the late 1800s and early 1900s an indication of the prosperity that came with the arrival of the Hamilton Grimsby and Beamsville Electric Railway in1894. A defining feature of the landscape are the distinctive fruit barns. Many of the original fruit barns still survive to this day, located just to the rear of the houses. A landmark of the area is the Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates. A memorial to the local men and women who fell in the First World War. The gate is constructed of local red limestone. It is a reminder of the significance of the conflict on the community which saw many local families impacted.

Description of Heritage Attributes

Key attributes of the Main Street East District that reflect its value as an important link to the history of Grimsby include:

1. 19th and early 20th Century Residential Architecture 2. Mature Trees 3. Fruit Barns 4. Queen’s Lawn Cemetery Gates 5. Centennial Park (1967) view to the escarpment 6. Backdrop view towards the Niagara Escarpment

The property at 224 Main Street E contributes to the following of the above mentioned attributes of the historic Main Street Cultural Heritage Landscape. This property contributes to the 19th and early 20th century residential architectural style that is historically found along this corridor. This property is situated on a large sized property with a backdrop of the escarpment framing the historic dwelling. The property is covered by a lush canopy with a variety of large mature trees including a large historic beech wood tree.

8 Page 156 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

5.0 SITE ANALYSIS

5.1 Site Development

5.2 Existing Condition

The site currently consists of the following structures:

1. Historic two storey dwelling 2. Ice House

The site currently consists of the following landscaping:

3. Large Mature trees and shrubs 4. Carriage Step 5. Large Beech Tree

9 Page 157 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

5.3 Architectural Details of the Dwelling

Pictured below is the dwelling on the property at 224 Main Street East. This dwelling was constructed in 1888 in the Italianate architectural style. The historical dwelling stands two storeys tall and is surrounded by a lush greenspace. This home is dressed with soft kiln fired red clay bricks laid in a running bond and paired with a soft lime based mortar. The original clay brick running bond is interrupted in the corners with elaborate brick quoins on both the exterior corners of the dwelling and the exterior corners of the frontispiece. The historic clay bricks frame the openings of the original double hung segmentally arched wood windows. These windows are capped with segmental clay brick arches laid in a soldier formation which is finished with an ornate keystone which has a beveled top and a carving of an iris flower. The windows feature historic wooden shutters which meet at the center with segmental tops to fit comfortably in front of the original wooden windows The dwelling is then topped with an ornate roof line featuring bracketed eaves and brick tracing along the base of the eaves, this roof line is interrupted by two clay brick chimneys, one of which features the original clay brick decorative cap. The dwelling has an overwhelmingly welcoming front entrance with its ornate portico and double segmentally arched wood carved doors. The frontispiece is dressed from top to bottom with its decorative brackets, bull’s eye window, and its welcoming two storey portico which features turned wood railings and the second storey original wood door. The bull’s eye window at the center of the frontispiece is surrounded by a boarder of header clay bricks which are interrupted by symmetrically placed tooled key stones at each quarter.

Bull’s Eye Window Bracket Eaves

Brick Quoins Ornate Keystone FIGURE 2: Udell House at 224 Main Street East Source: Virtual listings

10 Page 158 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

5.4 Pictures of the Property

FIGURE 3 & 4: Udell House at 224 Main Street East Source: Virtual listings

11 Page 159 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

FIGURE 5 & 6: Udell House at 224 Main Street East Source: Virtual listings

12 Page 160 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

FIGURE 7: Large beech tree on the Udell House property at 224 Main Street East Source: Virtual listings

FIGURE 8: Beech tree & Ice house on the Udell House property at 224 Main Street East Source: Virtual listings

13 Page 161 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

5.5 Early Ice House Technology

Historically ice houses were used to provide homesteads with ice all year round to help with the preservation of fresh local goods. This advancement in technology had the ability to preserve cold products only a few feet below the rays of the strong summer sun. This early technology showed great advancements for its time, the complex construction of the ice house was extremely important to ensure the proper ventilation and the preservation of the ice blocks. The construction of these buildings were a precise science to ensure that the ice could maintain its solid form even on the hottest of days.

X2

FIGURE 9: Ice House section filled with ice. Source: Barns, Sheds and Outbuildings: A practical Guide 1881

These buildings were constructed on top of foundation pits eighteen inches to two feet deep in a dry, gravelly or sandy soil. If the building was constructed on a clay soil the foundations must be dug two feet deeper and filled with coarse gravel or broken bricks to help drain beneath the ice. To create a drain would be extremely risky, the coarse material would allow for the drainage to occur without installation of a substantial drain. It was imperative that there was no admission of air underneath the structure.

FIGURE 10: Ice House section showing roof ventilation. Source: Barns, Sheds and Outbuildings: A practical Guide 1881

14 Page 162 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

The floor of the ice house is typically an inch thick with pine wood floor boards spread across the exposed earth or in some cases on a rubble stoned floor. The ice would then be stacked on top of each other and covered with the sawdust from either a pine or hardwood tree. Alternative materials included charcoal powder, oat/wheat/buckwheat chaff or marsh hay. Once the type of material was selected the insulation would then be applied a foot thick on the sides between the ice and the wall and then on the bottom between the ice and the floor and then two feet deep on the top between the roof and the ice. The ice would then be laid out inside the structure, the ice would be spaced out using hay or alternative insulation materials between, above and below each cube to help prevent the fusing of the ice units. It was noted in the historic building manual that the separation of ice had been proven to preserve the ice best during the entire summer season. Typically the roof structure would be wood rafters secured forming the roof peak. Inch thick pine boards would then be laid vertically covering the internal roof construction and then battens would be laid on top to close the gaps where the boards meet. The center most rafters would be attached to a venting tower or venting cap this would be added to the roof structure to help with ventilation within the structure.

FIGURE 11: Ice House floorplan showing ice placement. Source: Barns, Sheds and Outbuildings: A practical Guide 1881

The outside of the structure is then covered with inch thick knotty pine boards covering the interior frame of the ice house, the spaces between the boards may be filled in using a thin batten. It was noted in the historic construction manual that climbing vines were encouraged to be used to help with the appearance and picturesque landscape of the ice house as well act as a barrier between the façade of the ice house and the forceful rays of the hot summer sun.

15 Page 163 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

5.6 Photographs of the Historic Ice House

The following photographs are of the historic ice house located on the property at 224 Main Street East. The historic ice house has an exterior wood siding with a venting tower and a front door as well as a sliding wood door at the rear. The rear sliding door was likely used to load the ice house with ice.

FIGURE 12 & 13: Ice house on the Udell House property at 224 Main Street East Source: 3

16 Page 164 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

FIGURE 14 & 15: Ice house on the Udell House property at 224 Main Street East Source: Virtual listings

17 Page 165 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

6.0 HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY

6.1 Site Development

Before The Neutral peoples inhabited the base of the lush escarpment and used the surrounding lands 1790 for settlement.

1790 Robert Nelles received the Lots 3 & 4 Concession 2, granted from the Crown in Upper Canada 1 as compensation and a reward for their effort during the American Revolution. 1827 Robert Nelles sells the property to Edward Pilkington.2

1833 Edward Pilkington sold the property to Henry Nelles

1855 The southeast portion of the lot was sold to Jacob Kitchen and west half was sold to George Maybe. The 1862 Tremaine Map shows George Maybe, William Kitchen, Jacob Kitchen owning Lot 4 Concession 2. 3

1855- Unkown 1875

Eugene Udell identified on the 1876 County Atlas 1876 1888 Eugene and Catharine Udell constructed the home at 224 Main St E

Farm Land was Sold 1945 1979 Remaining property sold outside the Udell family for the first time.

6.2 History: Nelles Family (Original Owner of the Land – Robert Nelles)

The property at 224 Main Street East was originally owned Robert Nelles. Robert Nelles took up permanent residence at the forty in 1787, he served as Township warden from 1791 to 1802. In 1803 he was elected a member of parliament and prior to this was appointed Justice of the Peace. In 1794, he was commissioned as an officer in the 4th Lincoln Militia and by the end of the war of 1812 was the commanding officer of the 4th Lincoln Regiment having served in all the important battles at the frontier. Colonel Nelles also served during the Mackenzie rebellion and the Finnian Raids. Colonel Nelles amassed a great deal of property at the forty, two acres of which he deeded to the church of England where St. Andrew’s Church and the cemetery now stand, he also owned one sawmill, one store and 3 homes including Nelles Manor. 4

1 1791 Patent Plan Grimsby Township 2 Land 3 1862 Tremaine Map Lincoln and Welland County Map 4 Designation Report – Nelles Manor

18 Page 166 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

6.3 History: Kitchen Family (Original Owner of the Land – William & Jacob Kitchen)

The property at 224 Main Street East was owned William Kitchen. William Kitchen was a loyalist from New Jersey, who came into the Niagara District as early at 1792. Upon arrival William built a saw and grist mill on a creek in Clinton Township. William was eventually granted land in the Grimsby Township as well as lots A & B in the Grimsby Gore. In 1791 William was a member of the Grimsby Township Council, serving as one of the two overseers of roads. In 1796 he was appointed Assessor. William was born in 1761 in New Jersey, William married Alice the daughter of Jacob and Catherine Beam of Clinton Township. William and Alice went on to have 13 children.

6.4 History: Udell Family (Lived and built the home)

The Udell family originally came from Holland and travelled to England, later the family came to American and settled in New Jersey. Morris Udell an United Empire Loyalist then moved to Canada and settled in the Grimsby Township. It was in Grimsby that he married his wife Harriet Tiffany in 1825. Morris bought lot 11 concession 2 from Robert Nelles. This parcel of land bordered Cypress creek, Morris Udell went on to build the Cypress Inn, as well as a carriage shop on Main Street5. The Cypress Inn was a stagecoach stop for many years. Morris and Harriet had a son name Eugene. Eugene married Catherine and the two went on to build the house at 224 Main Street East in 1888. Eugene built this house for his son George and his new wife Annie. They lived in the house and ran a successful nursery stock and fruit farming operation as will as raising horses and cattle. Although the farmland was sold off in 1945, the house remained in the Udell family until 1979.

6.5 History: Shafer Brothers (Renovated the historic home during the 1940s)

During the 1940’s the safer brothers did extensive renovations on the historic home at 224 Main Street East which included replacing the original picket railing with new railings turned by the safer brothers. The Shafter family first came to Grimsby at the turn of the century. Conrad and Emma Shafer moved to Grimsby in 1900, Conrad worked with Daniel Marsh at the local planning mill. Conrad and Emma has six children, two of which went on to start a construction business known as the Shafer Bros General Contractors in 1922. The Shafer Bros become well known in the Township and quickly became very popular. They went on to build several custom homes in Grimsby and completed numerous commercial and renovation projects throughout the Town of Grimsby. Nelles Boulevard, St Andrews Avenue and Park Road North have serval custom homes built by the Shafer Brothers. The brothers had a very unique style incorporating craftsmen’s style with traditional building styles. Today many of these custom Shafer homes are admired and celebrated by the Grimsby Community.

5 The streets of Grimsby – A-W

19 Page 167 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

7.0 EVALUATION

7.1 Assessment of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest

A property may be designated under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act if it meets one or more of the following criteria for determining whether it is of cultural heritage value or interest

7.2 The property has design value or physical value because it:

Meets O. Reg. 9/06 Criteria Criteria Summary (Y/N)

1. The property has design value or physical value because it,

i) Is a rare, unique, representative or Yes The historic dwelling at 224 Main Street East is a strong early example of a style, type, representation of the Italianate architectural style that expression, and material or was prevalent along historic streetscapes during the construction method mid to late 19th century. The historic dwelling stands two storeys high and has many elements of the Italianate architectural style these elements include frontispiece, bracketed eaves, a bullseye window, brick quoins, bay windows, and flat decked roof.

The historical ice house located on the property at 224 Main Street East is both a rare and unique method of construction to find in today’s landscapes. ii) Displays a high degree of Yes The historic dwelling displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit craftsmanship and artistic merit. The Italianate style dwelling is ornately crafted with carved keystones, carved corbels, turned spindles, original wooden shutters with segmentally arched tops, decorative brick coins and elaborate frontispiece. The historic home is a true testament to the traditional craftspeople of the past generations. iii) Demonstrates a high degree of Yes The construction of ice houses during the 19th century technical or scientific achievement was a significant technical advancement. This advancement allowed for homesteads to preserve perishable food. The construction of ice houses were a precise science to ensure proper ventilation and proper moisture control.

7.3 The property has historical value or associative value because it,

2. The property has historical value as of associative value because it,

i) Has direct associations with a theme, Yes The land was originally owned by Robert Nelles. Robert event, belief, person, activity, Nelles was permanent resident at the forty in 1787, he organization or institution that is served as Township warden and Justice of the Peace. significant to a community. Robert was commissioned as in officer in the 4th Lincoln Militia and by the end of the War of 1812 Robert was the commanding officer. Robert received the Lots 3 & 4 Concession 2, granted from the Crown in Upper Canada as compensation and a reward for their effort during the American Revolution. Robert Nelles then sold the property to Edward Pilkington in 1827. Edward Pilkington then sold the property to Henry Nelles in 1833. Later the southeast portion of the lot was sold to Jacob Kitchen and western half was sold to George Maybe in 1855.

20 Page 168 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

The 1862 Tremaine Map shows George Maybe, William Kitchen, Jacob Kitchen owning Lot 4 Concession 2. By 1876 the County Atlas showed the owner of property to be Eugene Udell. The dwelling at 224 Main St E has direct connections to the significant Udell family. Eugene and Catharine Udell built the house in 1888. Eugene was the son of Morris and Harriet Udell who, as United Empire Loyalists immigrated to Canada from the United States in the early 1800’s. The Udells were early settlers to the Grimsby Township. Eugene built this house for his son George and his new wife Annie. They lived in the house and ran a successful nursery stock and fruit farming operation as well as raising horses and cattle. Although the farmland was sold off in 1945, the house remained in the Udell family until 1979.

During the 1940’s the safer brothers did extensive renovations on the historic home which included replacing the original picket railing with new railings turned by the safer brothers. The Shafter family first came to Grimsby at the turn of the century in 1900. The Shafer brothers had a very unique style incorporating craftsmen’s influences with traditional building styles. Many of these custom Shafer homes are admired and celebrated by the Grimsby Community.

ii) Yields, or has the potential to yield, No Property does not yield, or have the potential to yield information that contributes to an information that contributes to an understanding of a understanding of a community or community or culture, or culture, or

iii) Demonstrates or reflects the work or No Property does not demonstrate or reflect the work or ideas of an architect, artist, ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist builder, designer or theorist who who sis significant to a community is significant to a community.

7.4 The property has contextual value because it,

3. The property has contextual value because it,

i) Is important in defining, maintaining Yes The historic dwelling at 224 Main St E is representative or supporting the character of an of the age and architectural style that historically was area, found along the historic Main Street corridor.

ii) Is physically, functionally, visually or Yes The dwelling at 224 Main Street East is physically, historically linked to its functionally, visually and historically linked to its surroundings, or surroundings as it contributes to the Council identified Cultural Heritage Landscape along the historic Main Street corridor. The scale, mass and form of the historic dwelling contributes to the cohesive collection of traditional farm house estates that continued to fill the significant streetscape as the Main Street developed. The remaining farm house estates act as vestiges of the past as they depict the successful tender fruit industry that contributed the prosperity of the Town. iii) Is a landmark. No Property is not a landmark.

21 Page 169 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

7.5 CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST

“The statement of cultural heritage value or interest, including a description of the heritage attributes along with all other components of the Heritage Designation Brief constitute the "Reasons for the Designation" required under the Ontario Heritage Act. The Heritage Designation Brief is available for viewing in the Town Planning Department during regular business hours.”

7.6 STATEMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST

The historic dwelling at 224 Main Street East is a strong representation of the Italianate architectural style that was prevalent along historic streetscapes during the mid to late 19th century. The historic dwelling stands two storeys high and has many elements of the Italianate architectural style these elements include frontispiece, bracketed eaves, a bullseye window, brick quoins, bay windows, and flat decked roof.

The historical ice house located on the property at 224 Main Street East is both a rare and unique method of construction to find in today’s landscapes.

The historic dwelling displays a high degree of craftsmanship and artistic merit. The Italianate style dwelling is ornately crafted with carved keystones, carved corbels, turned spindles, original wooden shutters with segmentally arched tops, decorative brick coins and elaborate frontispiece. The historic home is a true testament to the traditional craftspeople of the past generations.

The construction of ice houses during the 19th century was a significant technical advancement. This advancement allowed for homesteads to preserve perishable food. The construction of ice houses were a precise science to ensure proper ventilation and proper moisture control.

The land was originally owned by Robert Nelles. Robert Nelles was permanent resident at the forty in 1787, he served as Township warden and Justice of the Peace. Robert was commissioned as in officer in the 4th Lincoln Militia and by the end of the War of 1812 Robert was the commanding officer. Robert received the Lots 3 & 4 Concession 2, granted from the Crown in Upper Canada as compensation and a reward for their effort during the American Revolution. Robert Nelles then sold the property to Edward Pilkington in 1827. Edward Pilkington then sold the property to Henry Nelles in 1833. Later the southeast portion of the lot was sold to Jacob Kitchen and western half was sold to George Maybe in 1855. The 1862 Tremaine Map shows George Maybe, William Kitchen, Jacob Kitchen owning Lot 4 Concession 2. By 1876 the County Atlas showed the owner of property to be Eugene Udell.

The dwelling at 224 Main St E has direct connections to the significant Udell family. Eugene and Catharine Udell built the house in 1888. Eugene was the son of Morris and Harriet Udell who, as United Empire Loyalists immigrated to Canada from the United States in the early 1800’s. The Udells were early settlers to the Grimsby Township. Eugene built this house for his son George and his new wife Annie. They lived in the house and ran a successful nursery stock and fruit farming operation as well

22 Page 170 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020 as raising horses and cattle. Although the farmland was sold off in 1945, the house remained in the Udell family until 1979.

During the 1940’s the safer brothers did extensive renovations on the historic home which included replacing the original picket railing with new railings turned by the safer brothers. The Shafter family first came to Grimsby at the turn of the century in 1900. The Shafer brothers had a very unique style incorporating craftsmen’s influences with traditional building styles. Many of these custom Shafer homes are admired and celebrated by the Grimsby Community.

The historic dwelling at 224 Main St E is representative of the age and architectural style that historically was found along the historic Main Street corridor.

The dwelling at 224 Main Street East is physically, functionally, visually and historically linked to its surroundings as it contributes to the Council identified Cultural Heritage Landscape along the historic Main Street corridor. The scale, mass and form of the historic dwelling contributes to the cohesive collection of traditional farm house estates that continued to fill the significant streetscape as the Main Street developed. The remaining farm house estates act as vestiges of the past as they depict the successful tender fruit industry that contributed the prosperity of the Town.

7.7 HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES TO BE DESIGNATED

The Heritage Attributes to be designated at 224 Main Street East include:

 Hipped roof with flat deck top roof intersected by a front facing gable and clay brick chimney  Exterior Facades of the historic home constructed with clay brick construction paired with a soft lime based mortar  Cornice with intercut bracketed eaves  Original openings with tooled stone sills and topped with segmentally arched clay bricks laid in soldier bond formation secured with tooled keystone featuring stone carved iris flowers  Bulls eye window with circular clay header brick bond tracing the window divided quarterly with four tooled keystones  Segmentally arched double hung restored wood windows with original wood segmentally arched restored louvered shutters  Double stacked porch with wood picket railing  Segmentally arched Wood double doors surrounded by original old growth wood framing topped with a segmental solider bonded clay brick arch affixed with a large keystone featuring an iris flower.  Brick Quoins  Cut stone foundation – regular coursed layout with a beaded mortar joint and paired with a soft lime based mortar  Bay windows with bracketed eaves and upper picket railing  Ice house with wood siding and ventilation tower  Beech Tree  Carriage Step

23 Page 171 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

8.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

8.1 Summary

This report was prepared to assess the building at 224 Main Street East against the criteria for the Ontario Heritage Act for designation under Section 29, Part IV of the Act. Research was undertaken by consulting primary and secondary sources and site visits were undertaken to evaluate the dwelling and take photographs. The significant values of this structure have been determined in Section 7 of this report. The statement of cultural heritage value or interest is contained in Section 7.6. of this report, additionally the heritage attributes have been identified in Section 7.7. These attributes have been determined to merit designation as they contribute to the significance of the building, and as such should be outlined in the designation by-law as significant elements.

The limitations of this report are based on missing information from the time this structure was constructed in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s. During the production of this report various information was required and unfortunately based on the age of the structure and lack of documentation we were unable to identify the following:

1. Additional information about the house between 1855-1875.

Note: Exterior analysis only

The analysis of this report was completed with the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. During the analysis the following was prepared:

 Description of Property  Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.  Description of Heritage Attributes and  Legal Description

Policy framework has been created to ensure the conservation of heritage sites and architectural attributes. The following policies have been put in place from both the municipal and provincial level. These policies are as follows:

 Provincial Policy Statement  Regional Official Plan  Town of Grimsby Official Plan

24 Page 172 of 198 Heritage Research Report 224 Main Street East October 2020

8.2 Findings

During the analysis of this report the attributes and the architectural significance of this structure were identified. This historic structure contains many of the original architectural elements from its construction in the 1880s. In addition this historic structure contributes to the architectural style, massing and scale that was traditionally found along this streetscape. The historic structure was built by an established family who moved to Grimsby in the 1820s. This property is situated on a large sized property with a backdrop of the escarpment. The large property features an original ice house, historic beech tree and an original carriage step. The original ice house is a significant and rare find. This structure, surrounding trees and ice house building contribute to the cultural heritage landscape that can be found along the historic Main Street corridor.

During the assessment of cultural heritage value or interest on this particular historic structure it was determined that this building meets 7 of the required criteria to be considered for designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

8.3 Recommendations

Based on the assessment of cultural heritage value or interest staff has recommended that the designated structure’s bylaw be amended to include additional significant attributes including the carriage step and rare ice house under Part IV, section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

25 Page 173 of 198 Updated Status & Activity Report Heritage Advisory Committee – Active Projects

Resolution/ Date Project/Item Description Status Additional Notes

Designation Reports & Research Designation report is being completed.

GH-19-15 (Designation) Additional information provided GH-19-16 prior to Covid-19. Confirmation of (Requested Peer Review) 141 Main St E Christmas Cottage information requires additional Initial Review was Submitted May 7 2019 research.

Report Completed.

Report Completed with Bill 108 Changes and will be brought to Peer reviewer making future Heritage Meeting. recommendations on recent Bill GH-19-15 (Designation) 108 changes and these will be GH-19-16 Additional information provided incorporated into all reports that 147 Main St E (Requested Peer Review) Coles Florist prior to Covid-19. Confirmation of are currently complete and

May 7 2019 information requires additional waiting on the peer review research. New History has been provided Report Completed. from the coles family.

Page 174 of198 Report is being updated per peer reviewer’s recommendations.

8-10 Ontario (Requested a heritage research Peer reviewer had agreed with our Street Purpose Built Duplex Owner has been updated. report) May 7,2019 recommendation for designation.

Homeowner has been notified that the town will be designating the property. Updated Status & Activity Report Heritage Advisory Committee – Active Projects

Resolution/ Date Project/Item Description Status Additional Notes

Report Completed with Bill 108 Changes and was brought to the February Heritage Meeting. The Planning and Development Committee discussed the designation and requested staff to GH-19-23 (Requested a evaluate the boundaries of the Heritage Research Report) July designation. Staff is working on Committee Requested evaluating boundaries of heritage homeowners be notified after 2, 2019 122 Main St E GH -19-26 Heritage Dwelling property/ attributes. The owner designation report is complete.

(That this property be has been notified of the Designated) July 31 2019 designation and has indicated they Homeowner has been notified. will object to the designation.

Property Owners require consultation. Pending due to Covid Closures (Meetings at Town Hall).

Report Completed with Bill 108 Changes and will be brought to Committee Requested (Requested a Heritage 130 Main St E the Heritage Meeting. homeowners be notified after Research Report) June 4 2019 Danish Lutheran Church designation report is completed Page 175 of198 Report Completed. on September 3 2019

Report Completed with Bill 108 Changes and will be brought to (Requested a Heritage 104 Main St E the Heritage Meeting Heritage Dwelling Research Report) June 4 2019 Report Completed.

Updated Status & Activity Report Heritage Advisory Committee – Active Projects

Resolution/ Date Project/Item Description Status Additional Notes

(Requested a Heritage Report Completed with Bill 108 Research Report & Designation Changes and will be brought to Committee Requested and By-law amendment) September 224 Main St E Ice House the Heritage Meeting. Update on October 15, 2019 3 2019 Report Completed.

Outstanding Designation Plaques

Designation by-law was passed 133 Main Street James Willison Grout 18” Designation Plaque – July 16 2012 East Nelles House

Designation by-law was passed – July 15 2013 16 Ontario Street Doctors’ House 18” Designation Plaque Staff to bring a report forward with Corner of Thirty Designation by-law was passed Thirty Mountain Methodist a compiled list of the Road and Elm Standing Plaque – April 7 2014 Cemetery recommendations for the plaque Tree Road East text for each plaque Designation by-law was passed 5-11 Main Street Whittaker Block 9” Downtown Plaque – November 18 2013 East Staff to order new plaques and to present them at annual Page 176 of198 designation plaque presentation Designation by-law was passed night. – April 7 2014 Fair Avenue Bell Park Standing Plaque

35-37 Main Designation by-law was passed Canadian Bank of Street West 9” Downtown Plaque – January 20 2014 Commerce Building

Designation by-law was passed Phelps Avenue Grimsby Park Gate 18” Designation Plaque – October 5 2015 Updated Status & Activity Report Heritage Advisory Committee – Active Projects

Resolution/ Date Project/Item Description Status Additional Notes

Designation by-law was passed 15 Main Street Old Fire Hall 9” Downtown Plaque – April 7 2014 East

Designation by-law was passed 5 Boulton Grimsby Secondary School 18” Designation Plaque – May 15 2017 Avenue

Designation by-law was passed 1 Main Street Old 9” Downtown Plaque – January 15 2018 East

Designation by-law was passed – October 5 2015 Staff to order new plaque and to 270 Main St Avonlea present it at annual designation 18” Designation Plaque West G.H-19-31(New Plaque plaque presentation night. Selected) -October 15 2019

Other Plaques

(The Committee agreed to move Queen’s Lawn Grimsby Remembers Drafts being updated with To be installed with this year’s forward with 5 plaques and Cemetery Gates Plaque Committee’s revisions plaque 2019 budget Page 177 of198 requested proofs be reviewed before finalized) – July 2 2019 (The Committee agreed to move forward with 5 plaques and Grimsby Remembers Drafts being updated with To be installed with this year’s Grimsby Arena requested proofs be reviewed Plaque Committee’s revisions plaque 2019 budget before finalized) – July 2 2019 (The Committee agreed to move forward with 5 plaques and Grimsby Remembers Drafts being updated with To be installed with this year’s Place Polonaise requested proofs be reviewed Plaque Committee’s revisions plaque 2019 budget before finalized) – July 2 2019 Updated Status & Activity Report Heritage Advisory Committee – Active Projects

Resolution/ Date Project/Item Description Status Additional Notes

(The Committee agreed to move In the process of arranging To be installed at the same time forward with 5 plaques and installation. as Queen’s Lawn Cemetery, Microclimate Grimsby Waterfront Plaque requested proofs be reviewed Grimsby Arena, Place before finalized) – July 2 2019 (Delay due to Covid Closures.) Polonaise (The Committee agreed to move In the process of arranging To be installed at the same time forward with 5 plaques and installation. as Queen’s Lawn Cemetery, Lake Iroquois Grimsby Waterfront Plaque requested proofs be reviewed Grimsby Arena, Place before finalized) – July 2 2019 (Delay due to Covid Closures.) Polonaise (The Committee agreed to move forward with 5 plaques. Carnegie Library and the Old Grimsby Remembers Drafts being updated with Carnegie Library Future Plaque Installation stone shop would be proposed Plaque Committee’s revisions for future plaque budgets) – July 2 2019 (The Committee agreed to move forward with 5 plaques. Carnegie Library and the Old The Old Stone Grimsby Remembers Drafts being updated with Future Plaque Installation stone shop would be proposed Shop Plaque Committee’s revisions for future plaque budgets) – July 2 2019 Other Projects Staff are reviewing heritage Consultant Selection Interview Land Use component as part of selection July 29, 2020 Page 178 of198 (The committee selected Planning Study – Committee Grimsby Beach as the CHL) Grimsby Beach -September 3, 2019 With Heritage Consultant Selection Component Staff has provided Consultant with September, 2020 information request. Older designation reports are (The Committee requested an Town Website Heritage Tool being digitalized for installation on update) September 3 2019 the Town’s Website. Updated Status & Activity Report Heritage Advisory Committee – Active Projects

Resolution/ Date Project/Item Description Status Additional Notes

Designation By-laws have been added to the website.

(Heritage Register update was Staff has requested more Notification letters are being Heritage submitted) October 1 2019 Currently being Updated properties to be submitted by the sent to homeowners after Register Committee. council approval.

Zoning Amendment application for proposed mixed use development (commercial/ residential) The dwelling and largest mature tree are designated (Staff provided reports to the Heritage Committee has provided under the OHA peer reviewer)- October 31 2019 Heritage Impact 133 Main St E comments on both HIA and Peer Assessment The Heritage Committee has (Committee Reviewed Reports) Reviewed HIA -February 27 2020 provided comments. Applicant has indicated the application will be revised. The Committee will review any future Heritage Impact

Page 179 of198 Assessment Report addendum materials.

The dwelling and largest (Staff provided reports to the mature tree are designated peer reviewer)- November 1 Heritage Committee has provided under the OHA 2019 133 Main St E Arborist Report comments on both Arborist Report (Committee Reviewed Reports) and Peer Reviewed Arborist Applicant has indicated the -February 27 2020 application will be revised. The Committee will review any Updated Status & Activity Report Heritage Advisory Committee – Active Projects

Resolution/ Date Project/Item Description Status Additional Notes

future Arbourtist Report addendum materials.

Preliminary Research has been Located near the proposed (Staff was requested to look into Building listed on heritage started. development at the NE Corner the history of 78 Livingston) July 78 Livingston 31 2019 register Pending due to Covid Closures of Slessor Boulevard and (Archives, Land Registry Office). Livingston Avenue.

Update and adopt terms of Terms of Heritage Committee’s reference Reference Terms of Reference Bylaw has been passed

Working with CAO to complete Young Canada Heritage Planning Intern application. Pending Budget Works approval. Heritage Register

GH-19-3 (Notification process was received and adopted)- March 5 Notification of addition to the 2019 register letter was approved on Page 180 of198 Staff completed acknowledgement March 2019 and Removal from (Committee Discusses changes letter for the requests for removal Updated as directed by the with OHA through Bill 108) – Heritage Procedure for removal which will specify the requirements committee July 2 2019 May 7, 2019 Register for completing the removal Requests GH-19-22 submission Letters indicating the removal (Committee Passed Resolution processes outlined in the OHA to Update Notification Process was completed on November to be in conformity with Bill 108) 7th 2019 July 2 2019

Updated Status & Activity Report Heritage Advisory Committee – Active Projects

Resolution/ Date Project/Item Description Status Additional Notes

Heritage Report has been requested by the committee. Added to the Heritage Register Report is being Updated with Bill in 2008

8-10 Ontario 108 Changes. (Requested a heritage research Homeowners have inquired and Street Purpose Built Duplex report) May 7,2019 have been notified of the peer Peer reviewer had agreed with our recommendation for designation. view and that an updated report Homeowner has been notified that would be completed. the town will be designating the property.

Notification Letter was sent on Homeowner has requested July 26, 2019 removal on October 15 2019 GH-19-17 (36 Ontario were Heritage Dwelling on added to Municipal 36 Ontario Street Municipal Register Letters outlining the removal Register)May 7, 2019 Waiting on documentation stating processes was submitted for 36 the reasons for removal to be Ontario on Nov 7 th 2019 submitted by the homeowner

Homeowner has requested Notification Letter was sent on removal on September 10 2019 July 26, 2019 GH-19-17 (38 Ontario were

Page 181 of198 Heritage Dwelling on added to Municipal 38 Ontario Street Register)May 7, 2019 Municipal Register Waiting on documentation stating Letters outlining the removal the reasons for removal to be processes was submitted for 38 submitted by the homeowner Ontario on Nov 7 th 2019 Updated Status & Activity Report Heritage Advisory Committee – Active Projects

Resolution/ Date Project/Item Description Status Additional Notes

Homeowner has requested removal on March 5 2020.

Designation Report has been started the report has to be Notification Letter was sent on 33 Livingston Heritage Dwelling on completed within 90 days or February 19, 2020 Avenue Municipal Register removal request under the Ontario Heritage Act.

Pending due to Covid Closures (Archives, Land Registry Office).

Page 182 of198 Tribunaux Ontario Land Tribunals de I'aménagement du territoire Ontario Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Tribunal d'appel de I'aménagement local

655 Bay Street, Suite 1500 655 rue Bay, su¡te 1500 Toronto ON MsG 1E5 Toronto ON MsG 1E5 Telephone: (416)212-6349 Téléphone: (416) 212-6349 Toll Free: 1-866-448-2248 Sans Frais: 1-866-448-2248 Ontario Website: www.olt.gov.on.ca Site Web: www.olt.gov.on. ca

PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended

Applicant and Appellant Burgess Heritage Group lnc. Subject: Request to amend the Official Plan - Failure of Town of Grimsby to adopt the requested amendment Existing Designation: Neighbourhood Commercial Areas Proposed Designated: Site Specific (To be determined) Purpose: To permit a S-storey mixed use building Property Address/Description 133 & 137 Main Street East Municipality: Town of Grimsby Approval Authority File No.: 260-1 6-1 901 LPAT Case No.: PL200201 LPAT File No.: PL200201 LPAT Case Name: Burgess Heritage Group lnc. v. Grimsby (Town)

PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the PlanningAcf, R.S.O. 1990, c. P,13, as amended

Applicant and Appellant: Burgess Heritage Group lnc. Subject: Application to amend Zoning By-law No. 14-45 - Refusal or neglect of Town of Grimsby to make a decision Existing Zoning: Neighbourhood Commercial Proposed Zoning: Site Specific (To be determined) Purpose: To permit a S-storey mixed use building Property Address/Description 133 & 137 Main Street East Municipality: Town of Grimsby Municipality File No.: 26Z-16-1904 LPAT Case No.: PL200201 LPAT File No.: PL200202

NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY VIDEO

The Local Planning AppealTribunal ("Tribunal") will conduct a Case Management Conference (.CMC') by video for this matter.

This CMC will be held:

AT: 9:00 AM

ON: Thursday, October 29,2020

AT: https://global.gotomeetinq.com/join/185891 173

The Tribunal has set aside 1 day for this CMC.

Page 183 of 198 should attend the CMC and ask to be added as a party. Groups, whether incorporated or not, who wish to become parties should name a representative Parties do not need to be represented by lawyers or agents.

a ldentification of participants - persons who do not wish to participate throughout the hearing may attend the hearing and provide a written statement to the Tribunal

a ldentification of issues

a Possibility of settlement and/or mediation of any or all of the issues - the panel will explore with the parties whether the case before the Tribunal and the issues in dispute are matters that may benefit from mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process that encourages all sides in a dispute to get a better understanding of each other's positions and fully explore and negotiate options for a mutually acceptable settlement of all or some of the issues in dispute. The panel may direct, upon consent of the parties, that some or all of the issues in dispute proceed to mediation.

a Start date of the hearing.

o Duration of the hearing.

a Directions for prefiling of witness lists, expert witness statements and written evidence.

o The hearing of motions.

o Draft Procedural Order - parties are expected to meet (remotely, if needed) before the CMC to consider a draft Procedural Order, as per Rule 19.2. An electronic version of a Sample Procedural Order for Video Hearings is available on the Tribunal's website.

o Such further matters as the Tribunal considers appropriate.

Everyone should come prepared to consider specific dates for proceedings in this matter

AII persons who wish to participate in this matter are expected to be prepared should the Tribunal convert the CMC to a settlement conference, a motion for procedural directions, or a preliminary hearing, where evidence or formal statements or submissions may be heard. Even when no settlement is reached, the Tribunal may proceed to make a final decision on any evidence received during the conference.

PARTY OR PARTICIPANT STATUS REQUEST:

Persons other than the appellant(s), applicant, municipality or approval authority who wish to participate in the proceeding, either as a party or as a participant, are required to file a Party Status Request Form or Participant Status RequesVParticipant Statement Form with the assigned Tribunal Case Coordinator to outline their interest in the proceeding.

The Party Status Request Form and Participant Status RequesVParticipant Statement Form are available on the Tribunal's website (https://olt,qov.on.caltribunals/lpat/forms/) and are to be used to assist with the preparation of the request. lf you are requesting status, this form must be provided at least l0 days in advance of the CMC to: n Page 184 of 198 Registrar

n Page 185 of 198 SCHEDULE B

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ELECTRONIC PRE-FILING SUBMISSIONS

Submission requirements to organize the video hearing lf a person intends to refer to a document at the video hearing (for clarity, any document that is not in the Tribunal's case file), it is expected to be pre-filed, where possible, in paper copy and electronically with the Tribunal at least 10 davs before the date of the video hearing and provided to all parties. The deadline applies unless otherwise specified in the Rules.

Submission emails under 1OMB in size may be emailed directly to the assigned Tribunal Case Coordinator. Emails larger than 1OMB must be transferred to the Tribunal's Case Coordinator using an electronic file sharing link/service to avoid sending documents across multiple email parts. Where appropriate, documents are to be submitted in .pdf format.

Naming convention

To assist the Tribunal and the adjudicator during the event, it is important that all submissions are paginated and labelled appropriately to clearly identify the content of each document. Where a document contains numerous sections, each section is to be indexed to a table of contents.

Parties are asked to adhere to the following naming convention: case number_party role_ document type_date of hearing event. For example: PL123456_Applicant_Notice of Motion_Jan 1, 2020

Please see Rules 7 .1 and 7 .2lor the standard document submission requirements

n Page 186 of 198 The expert's complete report may be filed instead of this statement if it contains the required information.

An expert may not be permitted to testify if this statement or report is not served on all parties and filed with the clerk of the municipality when so directed by the Tribunal.

7.5 Dutv of the Exoert Witness lt is the duty of every expert engaged by or on behalf of a party who is to provide opinion evidence at a proceeding under these Rules to acknowledge, either prior to (by signing the acknowledgment form attached to the Rules) or at the proceeding, that they are to:

(a) provide opinion evidence that is fair, objective and non-partisan; (b) provide opinion evidence that is related only to the matters that are within the expert's area of expertise; (c) provide such additionalassistance as the Tribunal may reasonably require to determine a matfer in issue; and (d) acknowledge that these duties prevail over any obligation owed by the expert to the party by whom or on whose behalf he or she is engaged.

7.6 Other Witnesses The Tribunal may also require that a witness who is not presenting expert evidence provide a witness statement. A witness statement should contain (a) a short written outline of the person's background experience, and interest in the matter, (b) a list of the issues that they will discuss, and (c) a list of reports that they will rely on at the hearing. The Tribunal may decline to allow the witness to testify if this statement is required by the Tribunal and has not been provided to the other parties.

7.7 Participant Statements A person who wishes to participate in a proceeding as a participant, shall file a written participant statement that sets out their position on the matter and issues of the proceeding, together with an explanation of their reasons in support of their position. A participant may only make submissions to the Tribunal in writing unless participant status was conferred by the Tribunal in a procedural order that was issued prior to September 3,2019. ln that case, the person conferred participant status may make an oral submission to the Tribunal and be cross- examined by parties on the content of their oral submission or the content of their written participant statement pursuant to the procedural order. ln all circumstances, the Tribunal may direct a participant to pre-file their statement in advance of a hearing event with the Tribunal and all of the parties to the proceeding.

7.8 Amendment of Documents Documents filed with the Tribunal can only be amended with the consent of the parties or by a Tribunal Order. The Tribunal may require that the person requesting an amendment do so by way of a motion under Rule 10.

7.9 Copies of Tribunal Documents A person may examine any document filed with the Tribunal and copy it after paying the Tribunal's fee, unless a statute, a Court Order, aTribunal Order or these Rules provide othen¡vise. Persons, including participants in the proceedlng wishing to review expert witness statements and reports, may also do so at the Clerk's office when the Tribunal directs that witness statements or reports are to be filed at the municipality.

7.10 Return of Exhibits Exhibits of all types introduced at a hearing will be kept for 180days after the Tribunaldecision issues. The person introducing an exhibit may ask

H Page 187 of 198 RULE 8

ROLE AND OBLIGATIONS OF A PARTY

8.1 Role and Oblioations of a Party Subject to Rule 8.2 below, a person conferred party status to a proceeding before the Tribunal may participate fully in the proceeding, and by way of example may: (a) ldentify issues raised in a notice of appeal for the approval of the Tribunal; (b) Bring or respond to any motion in the proceeding; (c) Receive copies of all documents and supporting information exchanged, relied upon orfiled in connection with any hearing event conducted in the proceeding; (d) Present opening and closing submissions at the hearing; (e) Present and examine witnesses and cross-examine witnesses not of like interest; (f) Claim costs or be subject to a costs award when ordered by the Tribunal; and (g) Request a review of a Tribunal decision or order as set out in Rule 25.

8.2 Power of the Tribunal to Add or Substitute Parties The Tribunal may add or substitute a party to a proceeding when that person satisfies any applicable legislativetests necessary to be a party and their presence is necessary to enable the Tribunal to adjudicate effectively and completely on the issues in the proceeding.

8.3 Non-Apoellant Partv A party to a proceeding which arises under any of Subsections 17(24) or (36), Subsection 34(19) or Subsection 51(39) of the Planning Acf who is not an Appellant of the municipal decision or enactment may not raise or introduce a new issue in the proceeding. The non-Appellant party may only participate in these appeals of municipal decisions by sheltering under an issue raised in an appeal by an Appellant party and may participate fully in the proceeding to the extent that the issue remains in dispute. A non-Appellant party has no independent status to continue an appeal should that appeal be withdrawn by an Appellant party.

8.4 Common lnterest Class Where the Tribunal is of the opinion that more than one party is of common interest with another party or other parties, the Tribunal may, on its own initiative or on the request of any party, appoint a person of that class of parties to represent the classin the proceeding.

x Page 188 of 198 RULE 19

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES

19.1 Gase Management Conference At the request of a party, on its own initiative or as may be required by LPATA, the Tribunal may direct parties to participate in a case managementconference conducted by a Member, which can include settlement conferences, motions orpreliminary hearing matters, in order to:

(a) identify the parties and participants and determine the issues raised by the appeal; (b) identify facts or evidence the parties may agree upon or on which the Tribunal may makea binding decision; (c) obtain admissions that may simplify the hearing, which may include the examination of persons by the Tribunal as part of the conference; (d) provide directions for exchange of witness lists, witness statements, expert witness statements and reports, for meetings of experts to address the disclosure of information, including the disclosure of the information that was not provided to the Municipality before Council made its decision that is the subject of the appeal, and for further disclosure where necessary; (e) provide directions to the parties to file a hearing plan to outline how the hearing will proceed, the order of witnesses, or the anticipated time for submissions to ensure that the Tribunal sets aside sufficient time in its hearing calendar to dispose of the issues; (f) discuss opportunities for settlement, including possible use of mediation or otherdispute resolution processes; (g) fix a date and place for the hearing and estimate its length, and encourage the partiesto agree upon the dates for any procedural steps; (h) discuss issues of confidentiality, including any need to hold a part of the hearing in the absence of the public or to seal documents; (i) address the production and cost sharing of joint document books; and fi) deal with any other matter that may assist in a fair, cost-effective, and expeditious resolution of the issues.

19.2 Sample Procedural Order and Meetinq Before Case Management Conference The Tribunal may provide a sample procedural order to the parties before the case management conference. The parties are expected to meet before the case management conference to consider the matters set out in Rule 19.1 and present recommendations to the Tribunal for the conduct of the hearing. A sample procedural order is listed in the index of forms on the final page of these Rules.

19.3 Serving Notice of a Conference The Tribunal will issue directions to serve a Notice of Case Management Conference that provides the time and place of the conference. The person or municipality who is issued the direction must serve this notice on those persons entitled to notice of the conference and provide an affidavit to the Tribunal, at or prior to the conference, to prove service of the notice.

19.4 Tribunal Member Presides The Associate Chair will assign at least one Tribunal Member to conduct the conference.

19.5 Public Attendance at a Case Management Gonference A case

XX Page 189 of 198 20.4 Procedure When Obiection is Received lf the Tribunal receives an objection to hold a hearing event by electronic hearing, it may:

(a) accept the objection, cancel the electronic hearing, and schedule an oral or written hearing; or, (b) if the Tribunal is satisfied, after considering any responding submissions and the factors included in Rule 20.5, that no significant prejudice will result to a party, then the Tribunal will reject the objection and proceed with the electronic hearing.

20.5 Factors the Tribunal Mav Consider The Tribunal may consider any relevant factors in deciding to hold a hearing event by electronic hearing, such as, (a) the convenience to the parties and the Tribunal; (b) the likelihood of the process being less costly, faster, and more efficient; (c) whether it is a fair and accessible process for the parties; (d) the desirability or necessity of public participation in or public access to the Tribunal's process; (e) whether the evidence or legal issues are suitable for an electronic hearing; (f) whether credibility may be an issue and the extent to which facts are in dispute; or (g) whether an electronic hearing is likely to cause significant prejudice to any party or participant.

20.6 Directions for the Electronic Hearing The Tribunal may direct the arrangements for the electronic hearing or designate an approved location for videoconference to protect the integrity of the hearing process, including the security and confidentiality of evidence.

20.7 Videoconferences The Tribunal shall pre-approve all arrangements for conducting a hearing event by videoconference, lncluding the pre-filing and exchange of motion materials, documents, written submissions or any visual and written evidence, and the locations for the conference. lf a party or participant intends to request that the Tribunal accept any information, statement or material as an exhibit at a videoconference, such information, statement or material shall be prefiled with the Tribunal and provided to all padies or participants in accordance with the Tribunal's directions for conducting a hearing event by videoconference.

20.8 The View of the Camera A party's representative or a witness in a videoconference shall be in view of the camera, with minimal visual obstructions, in the course of their presentations or submissions to the Tribunal. Where a witness is being examined or crossexamined, there shall be a split screen view of both the witness and the person conducting the examination or cross-examination. Any document that may be referred to by parties or their witnesses shall be visible and legible to the Tribunal and all other parties to the conference, either by the camera or by referring to a copy of the document exchanged in accordance with the Tribunal's directions.

20.9 Photographic. Audio or Video Recordino No person shall take or attempt to take a photograph, motion picture, video recording, or other recording capable of producing audio or visual representations by electronic means, or othen¡rise, at any proceedings of the Tribunal othenryise open to the public, unless the presiding Tribunal Member authorizes the recording and the following conditions have to be satisfied by the person making the request: (a) the Tribunal Member determines that the proceedings will not be disrupted or delayed if approval is given; (b) the Tribunal u Page 190 of 198 PL20020UPL200202

EXPLANATORY NOTE

133 & 137 MAIN STREET EAST, GRIMSBY MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE TOWN OF GRIMSBY OFFICIAL PLAN AND THE TO\ilN OF GRIMSBY COMPREHENSIVE ZONING BY-LA\il 14.45

Description of the Subject Land

Burgess Heritage Group Inc. ("Burgess") has made applications to amend the Town of Grimsby Official Plan and Zoning By-law 14-45 as those instruments apply to the property municipally known as 133 &. 137 Main Street East in the Town of Grimsby and legally described as Part of Lot 6, Concession I in the Town of Grimsby, Regional Municipality of Niagara (the "Subject Lands"). A portion of the Subject Lands is designated pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. The Subject Lands are currently occupied by a vacant two and a half storey house and a one-storey outbuilding. A key map showing the location of the Subject Lands is below.

t

3 35 35 g!C

e,t ù g *

141

ûîah *Îf¡eel fos¡

Page 191 of 198 -2-

The Proposed Development

Burgess proposes to redevelop the Subject Lands with a five-storey mixed-use multi-unit residential building with commercial space at grade and to convert the existing vacant two and a half storey house into commercial space.

Purpose and Effect of the Proposed Official Plan Amendment

The Town of Grimsby Offrcial Plan currently designates the Subject Lands Neighbourhood Commercial Area, which permits a broad range of commercial uses to serve convenience shopping needs of surrounding residents. The purpose of the proposed amendment is to introduce a site specific policy for the Subject Lands that will permit a mixed-use residential and commercial building as described above, in accordance with certain site specific performance standards, including a minimum lot size, a maximum height, the number of permitted units, and urban design criteria.

Purpose and Effect of the Proposed By-law

The Town of Grimsby Zoning By-law 14-45 currently zones the Subject Lands Neighbourhood Commercial ("NC") which permits a broad range of commercial uses and dwelling units at or above the second storey. Site specific exception 126 applies to the Subject Lands, which permits additional uses and amends a series of performance standards for the Subject Lands. The purpose of the proposed amendment is to modifu the NC zone as it applies to the Subject Lands to permit the proposed development described above, with respect to permitted uses and performance standards.

Page 192 of 198 Motion

WHEREAS Section 40.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.18 authorizes the council of a municipality to undertake a study of any area of the municipality for the purpose of designating one or more heritage conservation districts;

AND WHEREAS on February 18, 2020 Council of the Town of Grimsby approved the "Main Street East Cultural Heritage Landscape or Heritage Conservation District Study" in its 2020 budget;

AND WHEREAS the Heritage Grimsby Advisory Committee provides Council with advice on identifying, conserving and promoting heritage within the Town of Grimsby;

AND WHEREAS the Heritage Grimsby Advisory Committee deems it desirable and expedient to initiate a Heritage Conservation District Study;

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Heritage Grimsby Advisory Committee formally submits to the Committee of the Whole the attached draft By-law, recommended for approval, designating the Main Street East Heritage Conservation District Study Area in accordance with Section 40.1 of the Heritage Act;

AND THAT the attached draft By-law be circulated to Staff for comments to be considered concurrently by the Committee of the Whole in the consideration of this Committee’s recommendations.

Page 193 of 198 The Corporation of the Town of Grimsby By-law No. 20-XX

A By-law to designate Main Street East between Robinson Street to the west and the municipal boundary to the east as a Heritage Conservation District Study Area.

WHEREAS Section 40.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.18 authorizes the council of a municipality to undertake a study of any area of the municipality for the purpose of designating one or more heritage conservation districts;

AND WHEREAS Council of the Corporation of the Town of Grimsby approved the “Main Street East Cultural Heritage Landscape or Heritage Conservation District Study” in the 2020 budget;

AND WHEREAS the area known locally as Main Street East and identified on Schedule ‘A’ attached to this By-law includes a collection of residential, commercial and open space properties that together represent a significant cultural heritage landscape in Grimsby;

AND WHEREAS the Ontario Heritage Act provides that if the council of a municipality undertakes a study of a heritage conservation district, the council may, by By-law, designate the area specified in the By-law as a heritage conservation study area for a period of up to one year;

AND WHEREAS the Ontario Heritage Act provides that a heritage conservation district study area By-law may prohibit or set limitations with respect to the alteration of property and the construction, demolition or removal of buildings or structures, or classes of buildings or structures within the heritage conservation district study area;

Page 194 of 198 AND WHEREAS the purpose of a heritage conservation district study is to examine the character and appearance of an area to determine if the area should be preserved as a heritage conservation district and to consider and make recommendations with regard to the establishment of a district plan to guide changes to properties located within the district;

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Grimsby hereby enacts as follows:

1. The area identified on Schedule ‘A’ attached to this By-law, the Main Street East Heritage Conservation District Study Area, is designated as a heritage conservation district study area (the “Study Area”) for a period of one year from the date of enactment of this By-law.

2. The Town shall undertake a heritage conservation district study of the Main Street East Heritage Conservation District Study Area (the “Study”) in accordance with the requirements of the Ontario Heritage Act, for the purpose of examining the character and appearance of the area to determine if the area, or any part of the area should be preserved as a heritage conservation district and to make recommendations with respect to the content of a heritage conservation district plan.

3. During the period of one year from the date of enactment of this By-law (the “Study Period”) no person shall construct, demolish or remove or permit the demolition or removal of any of the buildings and structures located on the lands and residential, commercial and institutional properties within the Study Area identified in Schedule ‘A’ to this By-law.

4. Notwithstanding Section 3 of this By-law:

A. Any properties within the area identified in Schedule ‘A’ that have prior to the date of enactment of this By-law, obtained approval to construct, demolish or remove buildings or structures located thereon, in accordance with a final Zoning By-law Amendment or Minor Variance

Page 195 of 198 approval, shall be permitted to proceed with any such construction, demolition or removal in accordance with the approval granted.

B. The properties municipally known as 167 Main Street East and 150 Central Avenue, upon which the current West Lincoln Memorial Hospital (WLMH) is jointly situated shall be excluded from the Study Area and requirements of this By-law. Any works, projects or undertakings in relation to the rebuild of the hospital on those lands and premises shall be subject to existing approval processes, as required.

5. And that the formal tendering process to select consultant(s) (the “Consultants”) to undertake the Study, shall be conducted in accordance with the Corporation of the Town of Grimsby By-law No. 04-119 (“A By-law Respecting Purchasing”).

6. And that the Terms of Reference for the above tender contractually require the completion and submission of final recommendations and options arising from the Study to Council before the expiry of this By-Law.

7. And that the Consultants, once approved by Council, shall immediately initiate the Main Street East Heritage District Conservation Study for the area identified on Schedule ‘A’.

8. This By-law shall come into force and take effect immediately upon its passing by Council and shall be in effect for a period of one year from the date of passage of this By-law.

9. The Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the giving of notice of the passing of this By-law to be served upon the owners of all of the properties within the Study Area and upon the Ontario Heritage Trust within 30 days of the passage of this By-law in accordance with the notice requirements under the Ontario Heritage Act and other applicable legislation.

Page 196 of 198 Schedule A

The proposed study area is comprised of all lands and properties with frontage onto Main Street East between Robinson Street to the west and Town's eastern limit (as shown in Attachment 1), and that are within the Cultural Heritage Landscapes identified along Main Street East in "Grimsby's Special Places" Town's document and endorsed by Council in 2015:

- Queen’s Lawn - Area of Heritage Resources and Scenic Character

- Neutral Indian Burial Ground

- Grimsby Main Street East / Park School Scenic Highway Heritage Route

- Grimsby Main Street Scenic Highway Heritage Route

- Hamilton Grimsby and Beamsville Electric Railway

- Old #8 Highway - First Nation's Trail - HG and B Railway

Page 197 of 198 Attachment 1

Main Street East Heritage District Conservation Study Area

Proposed Study Area Page 198 of