DOCSLIB.ORG

One Hundred Common Insects of New Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

One Hundred Common Insects of New Mexico Cooperative Extension Service • Circular 570 College of Agriculture and Home Economics CONTENTS Introduction ...............................................................1 Insect Identification List for Reference .....................2 Class Crustacea .........................................................3 Class Diplopoda ........................................................3 Class Chilopoda ........................................................3 Class Arachnida ........................................................3 Order Scorpiones .................................................4 Order Acari ..........................................................4 Order Araneae ......................................................4 Class Insecta ..............................................................4 Order Thysanura ..................................................5 Order Odonata .....................................................5 Order Orthoptera .................................................5 Order Mantodea ...................................................7 Order Phasmida ...................................................7 Order Blattaria ....................................................8 Order Isoptera ......................................................9 Order Dermaptera ................................................9 Order Anoplura ....................................................9 Order Hemiptera ................................................10 Order Homoptera ..............................................12 Order Neuroptera ...............................................14 Order Coleoptera ...............................................15 Order Lepidoptera .............................................22 Order Diptera .....................................................24 Order Siphonaptera ............................................27 Order Hymenoptera ...........................................27 Keys to Common Groups of Arthropods ................32 Keys to Selected Orders of Adult Insects ...............34 Keys to Selected Families .......................................41 Order Hemiptera ................................................41 Order Homoptera ...............................................42 Order Coleoptera ...............................................43 Order Lepidoptera .............................................48 Order Diptera .....................................................50 Order Hymenoptera ...........................................52 Glossary ..................................................................55 Index ......................................................................60 One Hundred Common Insects of New Mexico David B. Richman1, Carol A. Sutherland2, and Christian Y. Oseto3 Welcome to the third edition of “One Hundred Brief descriptions of taxonomic classes and orders are Common Insects of New Mexico!” This manual began introduced by boldface type, while common names are as a study guide for insect identification contests in noted in italics. New Mexico, although the illustrations and text make Descriptions and common names are based on those it handy for anyone with a basic interest in common included in A Field Guide to the Insects (970, 1st edition) arthropods in the state. The 100 species of insects and by D.J. Borror and R.E. White (Peterson Field Guide their relatives included in this manual were selected Series, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston). This and for their abundance, economic importance, diversity other introductory books about insects and their relatives of form and, sometimes, their peculiar appearance. are excellent references for beginners; the artwork and In the late 1970s, Ellis Huddleston, an entomologist photography in some volumes are spectacular. at New Mexico State University, started the first New While we wrote this manual to help students prepare Mexico state entomology contests with just 77 com- for identification contests, it also can be used to identify mon insects and their relatives. That list increased to insects and other arthropods that people commonly collect. 100 species when this manual was first printed in the Compare your specimen to descriptions or illustrations of early 1980s. The second edition included the key to all the orders or classes and then go through family descrip- orders, including several not covered in this manual, as tions, comparing specimens to illustrations. Remember well as an artificial key to all families included in the that only 00 common arthropods are included here. manual. In this third edition, we have five classes, 21 The key will be “artificial,” because it will lead you orders, two superfamilies, one multifamily group and correctly, or otherwise, to just those species. Consult the 84 separate families of arthropods represented. Between Field Guide listed above for unknowns that don’t fit our the second and third editions, the Order Orthoptera was descriptions. revised, such that mantids (Mantodea), cockroaches For those who are making arthropod collections, help- (Blattaria) and stick insects (Phasmida) were placed ful notes on where to look for various species and their into their own orders. This update, plus improvements feeding habits are included in the text. A handy glossary in the artwork by Carol Sutherland and Christian Oseto, of technical terms is at the end. Instructions on collect- justified preparation of the third edition. ing and preserving arthropods are summarized in Borror To simplify arthropod systematics for beginners, we and White and other beginning texts, including the 4-H are using only common names for the family or super- Entomology (project) Manual. family levels. Often, these names include all members of a family, with a few exceptions noted in the text. Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico; 2Department of Extension Plant Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico; 3Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. Insect Identification List for Reference COMMON NAMES 50. * Long-horned grasshopper CLASSES . * Ambush bug 51. Louse fly A. Arachnida 2. * American cockroach 52. * Mantid B. Chilopoda 3. * Ant 53. Metallic wood-boring beetle C. Crustacea 4. Antlion 54. Millipede D. Diplopoda 5. * Aphid 55. * Mosquito E. Insecta 6. * Assassin bug 56. Muscid fly 7. Backswimmer 57. * Noctuid moth ORDERS 8. * Bark beetle 58. Oriental cockroach F. Acari (= Acarina) 9. Bee fly 59. Picture-winged fly G. Araneae (= Araneida) 10. Black fly 60. Plant or leafbug H. Anoplura 11. * Blister beetle 6. * Plant hopper I. Blattaria 12. Blow fly 62. Pyralid moth J. Coleoptera 3. * Braconid wasp 63. * Robber fly K. Dermaptera 14. Brush-footed butterfly 64. Rove beetle L. Diptera 5. * Camel cricket 65. Sap beetle M. Hemiptera 6. Carrion beetle 66. Scale insect N. Homoptera 7. * Centipede 67. * Scarab beetle O. Hymenoptera 8. Chalcidid wasp 68. Scoliid wasp P. Isopoda 9. Checkered beetle 69. Scorpion Q. Isoptera 20. Cicada 70. Seed bug R. Lepidoptera 21. * Click beetle 7. Short-horned grasshopper S. Mantodea 22. Cricket 72. * Silverfish T. Neuroptera 23. Damsel bug 73. Skipper U. Odonata 24. Damselfly 74. Snout beetle V. Orthoptera 25. * Darkling beetle 75. Soft-winged flower beetle W. Phasmida 26. * Dermestid beetle 76. Soldier beetle X. Scorpiones (= Scorpionida) 27. Diving beetle 77. * Sowbug Y. Siphonaptera 28. * Dragonfly 78. Sphecid wasp Z. Thysanura 29. * Earwig 79. * Sphinx moth 30. * Flea 80. * Spider METAMORPHOSIS 31. * Flesh fly 8. Spider wasp None 32. Geometer moth 82. * Stink bug Simple 33. * German cockroach 83. * Sucking louse Complete 34. Giant silkworm moth 84. Sulfur Butterfly 35. * Gossamer-winged 85. * Swallowtail MOUTHPARTS butterfly 86. Syrphid fly Chewing 36. * Green lacewing 87. Tachinid fly Sucking 37. Ground beetle 88. * Termite 38. Halictid bee 89. Tick NOTE: The novice age group in 39. Hister beetle 90. Tiger beetle 4-H is responsible for knowing only 40. * Honey bee 9. Tiger moth 50 of the 100 common insects of New 41. * Horse fly 92. Tiphiid wasp Mexico. These are marked with an 42. Ichneumon wasp 93. * Treehopper 43. * Jerusalem cricket 94. Twig borer asterisk. 44. * Ladybird beetle 95. * Velvet ant 45. Leaf beetle 96. * Vespid wasp 46. Leafcutting bee 97. * Walkingstick 47. * Leaf-footed plant bug 98. Water boatman 48. * Leafhopper 99. Water scavenger beetle 49. * Long-horned beetle 00. Waterstrider 2 *CLASS CRUSTACEA, Order Isopoda: Sowbug. Terrestrial crus- taceans, related to crabs and shrimp. With seven pairs of legs and strongly segmented bodies. True antennae present, usually bending at several points. Body usually gray or black and 10 mm long or less. Common in gardens, under boards, damp areas, etc. Occasional pests; sometimes eat seedlings, developing strawberries. Nuisances in damp places. Metamorphosis none. Mouthparts chewing. CLASS DIPLOPODA: Millipede. Wormlike, cylindrical arthropods with many-segmented bodies. Most segments with two pairs of walking legs (only one pair per segment found in centipedes). Does not have venomous bite as some centipedes do but can produce foul smelling, defensive chemicals. Primarily plant feeders and scavengers. Occa- sional nuisances in flower beds rich in organic matter. Bodies black gray or brown; length variable, from a few mm to more than 100 mm (Orthoporus). Usually under rocks or boards; crawl on surface after summer
Recommended publications
  • Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E

    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E

    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers

    Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers

    732 _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 7, No. 2, June 2012__________ STRUCTURE OF LEPIDOPTEROCENOSES ON OAKS QUERCUS DALECHAMPII AND Q. CERRIS IN CENTRAL EUROPE AND ESTIMATION OF THE MOST IMPORTANT SPECIES Miroslav Kulfan* * Department of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina B-1, SK-84215 Bratislava, SLOVAKIA. E-mail: [email protected] [Kulfan, M. 2012. Structure of lepidopterocenoses on oaks Quercus dalechampii and Q. cerris in Central Europe and estimation of the most important species. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 7 (2): 732-741] ABSTRACT: On the basis of lepidopterous larvae a total of 96 species on Quercus dalechampii and 58 species on Q. cerris were recorded in 10 study plots of Malé Karpaty and Trnavská pahorkatina hills. The families Geometridae, Noctuidae and Tortricidae encompassed the highest number of found species. The most recorded species belonged to the trophic group of generalists. On the basis of total abundance of lepidopterous larvae found on Q. dalechampii from all the study plots the most abundant species was evidently Operophtera brumata. The most abundant species on Q. cerris was Cyclophora ruficiliaria. Based on estimated oak leaf area consumed by a larva it is shown that Lymantria dispar was the most important leaf-chewing species of both Q. dalechampii and Q. cerris. KEY WORDS: Slovakia, Quercus dalechampii, Q. cerris, the most important species. About 300 Lepidoptera species are known to damage the assimilation tissue of oaks in Central Europe (Patočka, 1954, 1980; Patočka et al.1999; Reiprich, 2001). Lepidoptera larvae are shown to be the most important group of oak defoliators (Patočka et al., 1962, 1999).
  • Plant Mobility in the Mesozoic Disseminule Dispersal Strategies Of

    Plant Mobility in the Mesozoic Disseminule Dispersal Strategies Of

    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 515 (2019) 47–69 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Plant mobility in the Mesozoic: Disseminule dispersal strategies of Chinese and Australian Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous plants T ⁎ Stephen McLoughlina, , Christian Potta,b a Palaeobiology Department, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden b LWL - Museum für Naturkunde, Westfälisches Landesmuseum mit Planetarium, Sentruper Straße 285, D-48161 Münster, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Four upper Middle Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous lacustrine Lagerstätten in China and Australia (the Daohugou, Seed dispersal Talbragar, Jehol, and Koonwarra biotas) offer glimpses into the representation of plant disseminule strategies Zoochory during that phase of Earth history in which flowering plants, birds, mammals, and modern insect faunas began to Anemochory diversify. No seed or foliage species is shared between the Northern and Southern Hemisphere fossil sites and Hydrochory only a few species are shared between the Jurassic and Cretaceous assemblages in the respective regions. Free- Angiosperms sporing plants, including a broad range of bryophytes, are major components of the studied assemblages and Conifers attest to similar moist growth habitats adjacent to all four preservational sites. Both simple unadorned seeds and winged seeds constitute significant proportions of the disseminule diversity in each assemblage. Anemochory, evidenced by the development of seed wings or a pappus, remained a key seed dispersal strategy through the studied interval. Despite the rise of feathered birds and fur-covered mammals, evidence for epizoochory is minimal in the studied assemblages. Those Early Cretaceous seeds or detached reproductive structures bearing spines were probably adapted for anchoring to aquatic debris or to soft lacustrine substrates.
  • Insecta: Phasmatodea) and Their Phylogeny

    Insecta: Phasmatodea) and Their Phylogeny

    insects Article Three Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Orestes guangxiensis, Peruphasma schultei, and Phryganistria guangxiensis (Insecta: Phasmatodea) and Their Phylogeny Ke-Ke Xu 1, Qing-Ping Chen 1, Sam Pedro Galilee Ayivi 1 , Jia-Yin Guan 1, Kenneth B. Storey 2, Dan-Na Yu 1,3 and Jia-Yong Zhang 1,3,* 1 College of Chemistry and Life Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China; [email protected] (K.-K.X.); [email protected] (Q.-P.C.); [email protected] (S.P.G.A.); [email protected] (J.-Y.G.); [email protected] (D.-N.Y.) 2 Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; [email protected] 3 Key Lab of Wildlife Biotechnology, Conservation and Utilization of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Simple Summary: Twenty-seven complete mitochondrial genomes of Phasmatodea have been published in the NCBI. To shed light on the intra-ordinal and inter-ordinal relationships among Phas- matodea, more mitochondrial genomes of stick insects are used to explore mitogenome structures and clarify the disputes regarding the phylogenetic relationships among Phasmatodea. We sequence and annotate the first acquired complete mitochondrial genome from the family Pseudophasmati- dae (Peruphasma schultei), the first reported mitochondrial genome from the genus Phryganistria Citation: Xu, K.-K.; Chen, Q.-P.; Ayivi, of Phasmatidae (P. guangxiensis), and the complete mitochondrial genome of Orestes guangxiensis S.P.G.; Guan, J.-Y.; Storey, K.B.; Yu, belonging to the family Heteropterygidae. We analyze the gene composition and the structure D.-N.; Zhang, J.-Y.
  • Electromagnetic Field and TGF-Β Enhance the Compensatory

    Electromagnetic Field and TGF-Β Enhance the Compensatory

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Electromagnetic feld and TGF‑β enhance the compensatory plasticity after sensory nerve injury in cockroach Periplaneta americana Milena Jankowska1, Angelika Klimek1, Chiara Valsecchi2, Maria Stankiewicz1, Joanna Wyszkowska1* & Justyna Rogalska1 Recovery of function after sensory nerves injury involves compensatory plasticity, which can be observed in invertebrates. The aim of the study was the evaluation of compensatory plasticity in the cockroach (Periplaneta americana) nervous system after the sensory nerve injury and assessment of the efect of electromagnetic feld exposure (EMF, 50 Hz, 7 mT) and TGF‑β on this process. The bioelectrical activities of nerves (pre‑and post‑synaptic parts of the sensory path) were recorded under wind stimulation of the cerci before and after right cercus ablation and in insects exposed to EMF and treated with TGF‑β. Ablation of the right cercus caused an increase of activity of the left presynaptic part of the sensory path. Exposure to EMF and TGF‑β induced an increase of activity in both parts of the sensory path. This suggests strengthening efects of EMF and TGF‑β on the insect ability to recognize stimuli after one cercus ablation. Data from locomotor tests proved electrophysiological results. The takeover of the function of one cercus by the second one proves the existence of compensatory plasticity in the cockroach escape system, which makes it a good model for studying compensatory plasticity. We recommend further research on EMF as a useful factor in neurorehabilitation. Injuries in the nervous system caused by acute trauma, neurodegenerative diseases or even old age are hard to reverse and represent an enormous challenge for modern medicine.
  • Camp Chiricahua July 16–28, 2019

    Camp Chiricahua July 16–28, 2019

    CAMP CHIRICAHUA JULY 16–28, 2019 An adult Spotted Owl watched us as we admired it and its family in the Chiricahuas © Brian Gibbons LEADERS: BRIAN GIBBONS, WILLY HUTCHESON, & ZENA CASTEEL LIST COMPILED BY: BRIAN GIBBONS VICTOR EMANUEL NATURE TOURS, INC. 2525 WALLINGWOOD DRIVE, SUITE 1003 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746 WWW.VENTBIRD.COM By Brian Gibbons Gathering in the Sonoran Desert under the baking sun didn’t deter the campers from finding a few life birds in the parking lot at the Tucson Airport. Vermilion Flycatcher, Verdin, and a stunning male Broad-billed Hummingbird were some of the first birds tallied on Camp Chiricahua 2019 Session 2. This was more than thirty years after Willy and I had similar experiences at Camp Chiricahua as teenagers—our enthusiasm for birds and the natural world still vigorous and growing all these years later, as I hope yours will. The summer monsoon, which brings revitalizing rains to the deserts, mountains, and canyons of southeast Arizona, was tardy this year, but we would see it come to life later in our trip. Rufous-winged Sparrow at Arizona Sonora Desert Museum © Brian Gibbons On our first evening we were lucky that a shower passed and cooled down the city from a baking 104 to a tolerable 90 degrees for our outing to Sweetwater Wetlands, a reclaimed wastewater treatment area where birds abound. We found twittering Tropical Kingbirds and a few Abert’s Towhees in the bushes surrounding the ponds. Mexican Duck, Common Gallinule, and American Coot were some of the birds that we could find on the duckweed-choked ponds.
  • Aquatic Critters Aquatic Critters (Pictures Not to Scale) (Pictures Not to Scale)

    Aquatic Critters Aquatic Critters (Pictures Not to Scale) (Pictures Not to Scale)

    Aquatic Critters Aquatic Critters (pictures not to scale) (pictures not to scale) dragonfly naiad↑ ↑ mayfly adult dragonfly adult↓ whirligig beetle larva (fairly common look ↑ water scavenger for beetle larvae) ↑ predaceous diving beetle mayfly naiad No apparent gills ↑ whirligig beetle adult beetle - short, clubbed antenna - 3 “tails” (breathes thru butt) - looks like it has 4 - thread-like antennae - surface head first - abdominal gills Lower jaw to grab prey eyes! (see above) longer than the head - swim by moving hind - surface for air with legs alternately tip of abdomen first water penny -row bklback legs (fbll(type of beetle larva together found under rocks damselfly naiad ↑ in streams - 3 leaf’-like posterior gills - lower jaw to grab prey damselfly adult↓ ←larva ↑adult backswimmer (& head) ↑ giant water bug↑ (toe dobsonfly - swims on back biter) female glues eggs water boatman↑(&head) - pointy, longer beak to back of male - swims on front -predator - rounded, smaller beak stonefly ↑naiad & adult ↑ -herbivore - 2 “tails” - thoracic gills ↑mosquito larva (wiggler) water - find in streams strider ↑mosquito pupa mosquito adult caddisfly adult ↑ & ↑midge larva (males with feather antennae) larva (bloodworm) ↑ hydra ↓ 4 small crustaceans ↓ crane fly ←larva phantom midge larva ↑ adult→ - translucent with silvery bflbuoyancy floats ↑ daphnia ↑ ostracod ↑ scud (amphipod) (water flea) ↑ copepod (seed shrimp) References: Aquatic Entomology by W. Patrick McCafferty ↑ rotifer prepared by Gwen Heistand for ACR Education midge adult ↑ Guide to Microlife by Kenneth G. Rainis and Bruce J. Russel 28 How do Aquatic Critters Get Their Air? Creeks are a lotic (flowing) systems as opposed to lentic (standing, i.e, pond) system. Look for … BREATHING IN AN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT 1.
  • Prairie Ridge Species Checklist 2018

    Prairie Ridge Species Checklist 2018

    Prairie Ridge Species Checklist Genus species Common Name Snails Philomycus carolinianus Carolina Mantleslug Gastrocopta contracta Bottleneck Snaggletooth Glyphalinia wheatleyi Bright Glyph Triodopsis hopetonensis Magnolia Threetooth Triodopsis juxtidens Atlantic Threetooth Triodopsis fallax Mimic Threetooth Ventridens cerinoideus Wax Dome Ventridens gularis Throaty Dome Anguispira fergusoni Tiger Snail Zonitoides arboreus Quick Gloss Deroceras reticulatum Gray Garden Slug Mesodon thyroidus White-lip Globe Slug Stenotrema stenotrema Inland Stiltmouth Melanoides tuberculatus Red-rim Melania Spiders Argiope aurantia Garden Spider Peucetia viridans Green Lynx Spider Phidippus putnami Jumping Spider Phidippus audax Jumping Spider Phidippus otiosus Jumping Spider Centipedes Hemiscolopendra marginata Scolopocryptops sexspinosus Scutigera coleoptrata Geophilomorpha Millipedes Pseudopolydesmus serratus Narceus americanus Oxidus gracilis Greenhouse Millipede Polydesmidae Crayfishes Cambarus “acuminatus complex” (= “species C”) Cambarus (Depressicambarus) latimanus Cambarus (Puncticambarus) (="species C) Damselflies Calopteryx maculata Ebony Jewelwing Lestes australis Southern Spreadwing Lestes rectangularis Slender Spreadwing Lestes vigilax Swamp Spreadwing Lestes inaequalis Elegant Spreadwing Enallagma doubledayi Atlantic Bluet Enallagma civile Familiar Bluet Enallagma aspersum Azure Bluet Enallagma exsulans Stream Bluet Enallegma signatum Orange Bluet Ischnura verticalis Eastern Forktail Ischnura posita Fragile Forktail Ischnura hastata Citrine
  • Lista Monografii I Publikacji Z Listy Filadelfijskiej Z Lat 2016–2019 Monographs and Publications from the ISI Databases from 2016 Till 2019

    Lista Monografii I Publikacji Z Listy Filadelfijskiej Z Lat 2016–2019 Monographs and Publications from the ISI Databases from 2016 Till 2019

    Lista monografii i publikacji z Listy Filadelfijskiej z lat 2016–2019 Monographs and publications from the ISI databases from 2016 till 2019 2019 Artykuły/Articles 1. Bocheński Z.M., Wertz, K., Tomek, T., Gorobets, L., 2019. A new species of the late Miocene charadriiform bird (Aves: Charadriiformes), with a summary of all Paleogene and Miocene Charadrii remains. Zootaxa, 4624(1):41-58. 2. Chmolowska D., Nobis M., Nowak A., Maślak M., Kojs P., Rutkowska J., Zubek Sz. 2019. Rapid change in forms of inorganic nitrogen in soil and moderate weed invasion following translocation of wet meadows to reclaimed post-industrial land. Land Degradation and Development, 30(8): 964– 978. 3. Zubek Sz., Chmolowska D., Jamrozek D., Ciechanowska A., Nobis M., Błaszkowski J., Rożek K., Rutkowska J. 2019. Monitoring of fungal root colonisation, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi diversity and soil microbial processes to assess the success of ecosystem translocation. Journal of Environmental Management, 246: 538–546. 4. Gurgul A., Miksza-Cybulska A., Szmatoła T., Jasielczuk I., Semik-Gurgul E., Bugno-Poniewierska M., Figarski T., Kajtoch Ł.2019. Evaluation of genotyping by sequencing for population genetics of sibling and hybridizing birds: an example using Syrian and Great Spotted Woodpeckers. Journal of Ornithology, 160(1): 287–294. 5. Grzędzicka E. 2019. Is the existing urban greenery enough to cope with current concentrations of PM2.5, PM10 and CO2? Atmospheric Pollution Research, 10(1): 219-233. 6. Grzywacz B., Tatsuta H., Bugrov A.G., Warchałowska-Śliwa E. 2019. Cytogenetic markers reveal a reinforcemenet of variation in the tension zone between chromosome races in the brachypterous grasshopper Podisma sapporensis Shir.
  • Order Ephemeroptera

    Order Ephemeroptera

    Glossary 1. Abdomen: the third main division of the body; behind the head and thorax 2. Accessory flagellum: a small fingerlike projection or sub-antenna of the antenna, especially of amphipods 3. Anterior: in front; before 4. Apical: near or pertaining to the end of any structure, part of the structure that is farthest from the body; distal 5. Apicolateral: located apical and to the side 6. Basal: pertaining to the end of any structure that is nearest to the body; proximal 7. Bilobed: divided into two rounded parts (lobes) 8. Calcareous: resembling chalk or bone in texture; containing calcium 9. Carapace: the hardened part of some arthropods that spreads like a shield over several segments of the head and thorax 10. Carinae: elevated ridges or keels, often on a shell or exoskeleton 11. Caudal filament: threadlike projection at the end of the abdomen; like a tail 12. Cercus (pl. cerci): a paired appendage of the last abdominal segment 13. Concentric: a growth pattern on the opercula of some gastropods, marked by a series of circles that lie entirely within each other; compare multi-spiral and pauci-spiral 14. Corneus: resembling horn in texture, slightly hardened but still pliable 15. Coxa: the basal segment of an arthropod leg 16. Creeping welt: a slightly raised, often darkened structure on dipteran larvae 17. Crochet: a small hook-like organ 18. Cupule: a cup shaped organ, as on the antennae of some beetles (Coleoptera) 19. Detritus: disintegrated or broken up mineral or organic material 20. Dextral: the curvature of a gastropod shell where the opening is visible on the right when the spire is pointed up 21.
  • Ag. Ento. 3.1 Fundamentals of Entomology Credit Ours: (2+1=3) THEORY Part – I 1

    Ag. Ento. 3.1 Fundamentals of Entomology Credit Ours: (2+1=3) THEORY Part – I 1

    Ag. Ento. 3.1 Fundamentals of Entomology Ag. Ento. 3.1 Fundamentals of Entomology Credit ours: (2+1=3) THEORY Part – I 1. History of Entomology in India. 2. Factors for insect‘s abundance. Major points related to dominance of Insecta in Animal kingdom. 3. Classification of phylum Arthropoda up to classes. Relationship of class Insecta with other classes of Arthropoda. Harmful and useful insects. Part – II 4. Morphology: Structure and functions of insect cuticle, moulting and body segmentation. 5. Structure of Head, thorax and abdomen. 6. Structure and modifications of insect antennae 7. Structure and modifications of insect mouth parts 8. Structure and modifications of insect legs, wing venation, modifications and wing coupling apparatus. 9. Metamorphosis and diapause in insects. Types of larvae and pupae. Part – III 10. Structure of male and female genital organs 11. Structure and functions of digestive system 12. Excretory system 13. Circulatory system 14. Respiratory system 15. Nervous system, secretary (Endocrine) and Major sensory organs 16. Reproductive systems in insects. Types of reproduction in insects. MID TERM EXAMINATION Part – IV 17. Systematics: Taxonomy –importance, history and development and binomial nomenclature. 18. Definitions of Biotype, Sub-species, Species, Genus, Family and Order. Classification of class Insecta up to Orders. Major characteristics of orders. Basic groups of present day insects with special emphasis to orders and families of Agricultural importance like 19. Orthoptera: Acrididae, Tettigonidae, Gryllidae, Gryllotalpidae; 20. Dictyoptera: Mantidae, Blattidae; Odonata; Neuroptera: Chrysopidae; 21. Isoptera: Termitidae; Thysanoptera: Thripidae; 22. Hemiptera: Pentatomidae, Coreidae, Cimicidae, Pyrrhocoridae, Lygaeidae, Cicadellidae, Delphacidae, Aphididae, Coccidae, Lophophidae, Aleurodidae, Pseudococcidae; 23. Lepidoptera: Pieridae, Papiloinidae, Noctuidae, Sphingidae, Pyralidae, Gelechiidae, Arctiidae, Saturnidae, Bombycidae; 24.
  • Flesh Flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) of Sandy and Marshy Habitats of the Polish Baltic Coast

    Flesh Flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) of Sandy and Marshy Habitats of the Polish Baltic Coast

    © Entomologica Fennica. 30 March 2009 Flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) of sandy and marshy habitats of the Polish Baltic coast Elibieta Kaczorowska Kaczorowska, E. 2009: Flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) of sandy and marshy habitats of the Polish Baltic coast. — Entomol. Fennica 20: 61—64. The results ofa seven-year study on flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) in sandy and marshy habitats ofthe Polish Baltic coast are presented. During this research, carried out in 20 localities, 25 species of Sarcophagidae were collected, ofwhich 24 were new for the study areas. Based on these results, flesh fly abundance and trophic groups are described. E. Kaczorowska, Department ofInvertebrate Zoology, University ofGdansk, Al. Marszalka Pilsadskiego 46, 81—3 78 Gdynia, Poland; E—mail.‘ saline@ocean. aniv.gda.pl, telephone: 0048 58 5236642 Received 1 1 December 200 7, accepted 19 March 2008 1. Introduction menoptera, while others are predators or para- sitoids on insects and snails (Povolny & Verves Sarcophagidae is a species-rich family, distri- 1997). Therefore, flesh flies occur in various buted worldwide and comprising over 2500 de- kinds of biotopes, including coastal marshy and scribed species. At present more than 150 species sandy habitats. On the Polish Baltic coast, species of flesh flies are known from central Europe of Sarcophagidae have been found in low abun- (Povolny & Verves 1997) and 129 from Poland. dance, and only one species, Sarcophaga (Myo— The Polish fauna of Sarcophagidae is relatively rlzina) nigriventris Meigen, has so far been re- well known, but the state of knowledge about corded (Draber—Monko 1973). Szadziewski these flies is uneven for particular regions of the (1983), carrying out research on Diptera ofthe sa- country.