Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ...... 1...... I 1.2 PROGRESS OF EA ...... 2 1.3 PURPOSE OF EA ...... 2 Public Disclosure Authorized 1 .4BASIS OF ASSESSMENT ...... 3 1. 4.1 World Bank Requirements...... 3 1. 4. 2National laws and regulations...... 3...... :...3 1.4.3Project Stdy Document .4 1. 4. 4InternationalEnvironmental Agreements (where China is a signing party) .4 1.4.50ther Study Docwnents Related to the Project .4 1.5PROCEDURE OF A.4 1.6 SCOPE OF THE EA .6 1.7 METHODOLOGY OF EA .6 1.8APPLICABLE STANDARD FOR EA .6 1.8.AAbienttAir.7 1.8.2Acoustic environment .7 1.8.3Surface Wate .8 1. 8.4 Soil Erosion .8
Public Disclosure Authorized 1.9 EA TEAMS.9 CHAPTER 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW .11 2.1 GEOGRAPHICAL LocATION .11 2.2 AFFECTED AREA.].. 2.3 ALIGNMENT CORR IDDRR]. . 2.4 CONSTRUCTION SCALE AND TECHNICAL STANDARDS .12 2.4.1 Bridge .13 2.4. 2Tunnel. 1 4 2.4.3 Interchanges.15 2.4. 4Connecting Road .16 2.5 HIGHWAY FACILITIES.16 2.6 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL AND TRANSPORTATION .16 2.7 TRAFFIC VOLUUME PROJECTION ...... 17...... 17 Public Disclosure Authorized 2.8 COST ESTIMATE AND FNANCING PLAN. 18 2.9 CONSTRUCTION PLAN 18 CHAPTER 3 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS .19 3.1 NATURAL ENV I R O NMNTT. 19 3.1.l TopographicalCharacteristics .. 19 3.1.2Climatic and MeteorologicalCondition .. 19 3.1.3 Hydrology .. 21 3.1.4 Navigation Condition .. 23 3.2 ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT ...... 24 3.2.1. Forest Park...... : 24 3.2.2Soil .. 24 3.2.3Natural Habitats .. 24 3.2.4Flora and FaunaResources .. 24 3.2.SSoil Erosion. 31 Public Disclosure Authorized 3.3 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC BASELINE .. 32 3.3. lEconomic ndicOtors .. 32 3.3 . 2,gg r i cut.rr e.33 3.3.3Quality of Life .. 35 3.3. 4.7Vatural Resource.. 3 7 3.3.5 Cultural Properties .. 38 3.4 ENVIRONMENT QUALITY INVESTIGATION .. 40 3.4.1 Existing,Acoustic Environment Quality .. 43 3.4.2 Water Environment Quality ...... 44 3.4.3 AmbientAir Quality Assessment ...... 46 CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ...... 48
4.1 IDENTIFICATION OF IMPACT ...... 48 4.2 A SSESSM ENTOF EC O- ENVIRONMENTIMPACT ...... 49 4.2.1 Soil Erosion ...... 49 4.2.2Analysis of Borrow and Spoil Impact ...... 54 4.2.3Analysis of Geological Impact...... 61 4.2.4Analysis of Impact on Vegetation...... 68 4.2.5Analysis of Impact on Animal ...... 69 4.2. 6IntegratedAnalysis of Bio-environment Impact ...... 70 4.2.7 Impacts of the South Water Diverted to North Project on the Roadbed ...... 72 4.2.8 Impacts of River and Road Rerouting...... 72 4.3 ANALYSIS OF I7MPACT ON AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT ...... 74 4.3. 1Hydrology and Flood Discharge...... 74 4.3.2Impact in Construction Phase ...... 74 4.3.3 Wastewater Dischargefr-om Supporting Facilities...... 75 4.3.4 Impact of Road Surface Run-off ...... 77 4.3.SAnalysis ofAccidental Event ...... 79 4.4ANALYSIS OF ACOUSTIC ENVIRONMENT QUALITY ...... 8 1 4.4. 1Analysis ofAcoustic Environment Quality in Construction Phase...... 81 4.4.2Analysis ofAcoustic Environment Quality in Operation Phase ...... 83 4.5 AMBITENT AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT ...... 93 4.5.1 Ambient Air Quality in Construction Phase ...... 93 4.5.2 Ambient Air Quality in Operation Phase...... 96 4.5.3 Impact to Air Quality at Supporting Facilities...... 103 4.5.4 Impact to Air Quality at Viaduct...... 103 4. 5.5Impact on Global Climate ...... 103 4.6 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ...... 104 4.6. Analysis of Inipact on Community ...... 104 4.6. 2Impact on Agricultural Production...... 106 4.6.3Conmmunity severance ...... 111 4.6.4Impact of Construction Camp andAccess Roads ...... 112 4.6.51mpact On Navigation on Han River ...... 117 4.6.61mpact on Cultural Heritage and Nature Reserve A rea ...... 118 4.6. 7Health and Safety ...... 122 4.6.8 Tunnel Ventilation and Emergency Measures ...... 124 4.6.9Analysis of Viaduct Location ...... 131 4.7 INDIRECT IMPACTS ...... 132 4. 7. lImpact to Local Resource ...... 132 4.77. 2Impact to Tourism ...... 132 4. 7.3Impact by Viaduct ...... 135 4.8 RELOCATION OF PEOPLE ...... 136 4.8.1Scope and Quantity of Relocation ...... 136 4.8.2Legal Frame ...... 138 4.8.3lmplementing Agency and Host Community ...... 143 4.8.4Impact of Resettlement...... 145 4.8.5Cost Estimate ...... 146 4.9IMPACT OF CONNECTING ROADS ...... 148 4.10 SAFEGUARDS POLICIES COMPLIANCE ...... 148 CHAPTER 5 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS ...... 150
5.1 GENERAL ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT ...... 150 5.1.1 Comparison and Selection of Cor7idors...... 150 5.1.2AlignmentAlternatives...... 152 5.1.3 Comparison and Selection ofAlternazives ...... 157 5.1.4 Social Environment ...... 161 5.1.5 Result of Comprehensive Comparison...... 161 5.2 SECTTEC ALTERNATIVES...... R ATVSIONAL...... 162....16 5.2. 1. Section selection principles ...... 162 5.2.2 Alternative Sections...... 168 5.3 WITHOUT PROJECT SCENARIO0...... 189 55.4 CONCL...... SIONS...... 9...... CL S O S ...... 09 CHAPTER 6 MITIGATION MEASURES ...... 191 6.1 DESI...... STAGE...... 19]...... E IG T G ...... 9 6.1. iDetermination of Project Alignment ...... 191 6. 1.2Mitigation to Road Separation...... 191 6.1. 3Mitigation to River System Impact ...... 192 6.1. 4Protection of Cultural Site and Nature Reserve Area...... 192 6.1.5Mitigation to Soil Erosion...... 194 6.1. 6Mitigation to Noise Impact...... 203 6.1. 7Mitigation to Water Quality Impact...... 203 6.1. 8R ep...... ant...... ng...... 204...... la tn 0 6.1. 9Mitigation to A ir hinpact...... 204 6.1. RResett...... en...... ent...... 205..... s tte e t ...... 0 6. 1. ilMitigation to A esthetics,and Landscape Impact...... 205 66.1. ci1n.2Ac...... dent...... Risk...... 205...... 0 6.2 MITIGATION ME-ASURE IN CONSTRUCTION PHASE...... 205 6.2.1 Soil Conservation/RestorationofIrr-igation System...... 205 6.2.2Mitigation to Noise Impact ...... 207 6.2.3 Water Quality Protection ...... 207 6.2. 4Mitigation to Air Impact...... 207 6. 2. SProtection of Cultur-al Heritage ...... 208 6.2. 6Mitigation to Puiblic Interruption ...... 208 6.2. 7Health and Safety ...... 209 6.2. 8Monage7nent of Construction Camp...... 209 6.2.9Protection of Bio-diversity ...... 209 6.2. 1 OManagement of Contractor ...... 210 6.3MMITIGATIONTIN TIATO HA E...... MEAS...... RE...... N...O....ERATION...... PHASE...... 2102 66 .l N.o i. se ...... 2 ...... 10..1 6.3.2 Water...... Quality...... 211...... t r Qu lt ...... 1 6 3.3Accidental Event ...... 211 66. Pub...... Health...... 211...... u lc H e lh ...... 1 6.3. SAir Pollution ...... 2-11 66. P u lc H e lh...... Health...... 211.... :...... 1 6 376d ct...... 212.. 1 66 . 7 o.u is ...... 2 ...... 12...1 CHAPTER 7 ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN...... 214
7.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS...... 214 7. 1. 1Management Organization ...... 214 7. 1.2Supervis ion Organization...... 214 7.2E VRO M NTMENVIRONMENT...... MANAGEMENT...... PLAN...... 215.... 2 7.3EENVIRONMENTALA VRO SUPERV...... SION...... PLAN...... 220..2 7.4EENVIRONMENTAL...... MONITOR...... G....PLAN...... VRO 221...2 7.4. O b e t ve...... b...... ec...... iv...... 221...... 2 7.4.2lmplementing Or-ganization ...... 221 7.4. 3Environmental Monitoring Plan...... 222 7.4. 4Monitoring Report ...... 224 7.4. SEquipmnent and Instrument ...... 224 7.5 PERSON...... EL...... TRAINING...... 22....5...... ER O N L R r 2 7.6 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND COST ESTIMATE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ...... 227 7.6. ]-Implementation Plan for Environment Protection...... 227 7.6. 2Cost Estimate for Environmental Protection...... 227 228 7.6.30perating Cost for Environmental Facilities...... 229 CHAPTER 8 PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 229 8.1 PURPOSE OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION ...... 229 8.2 INVESTIGATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ...... 229 8.2.lPhasing of Public Consultation Exercise ...... 230 8.2.2Methodology...... 231 8.2.3Survey Scope and Objects...... 231 THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ...... 8.3 OF I 231 8.3.1 Results of state ...... 232 8.3.2Survey Result ...... 232 8.3.3Public Meeting Reszult ...... 233 8.3.4Survey Result to Land Acquisition and Resettlement ...... 233 8.4 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION ...... 23 5 8.5 CONCLUSION OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION ...... 235...... 8.6 RECORD OF PLUBLIC OPINION ...... 243 8.7 INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ...... 246 CHAPTER 9 CONCLUSIONS ...... 24...... 6...I246 9.1 CURRENT ENVIRONMENT STATUS ...... 246 9.2ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES ...... ONCLUSIONOF ENVIRONMENT IMPACT PROJECTION ...... 247 9.3 C 247 9.3.lMajor Impacts and MitigationMeasures ...... 248 9.3.2Major Impacts In OperationPhase ...... 248 9.3.3Result of Public Consultation...... 248 9.4 GENERAL CONCLUSIONS .24......
LIST TABLE Table 1.6-1 Scopes of Environmental Assessment Table 1.8.1-1 Class 11 of Ambient Air Quality Standard (GB3095-1996) Table 1.8.1-2 Integrated Discharge Standard for Air Pollutant (GB6297-1996) Table 1.8.2-1 Standards of Environmental Noise in Urban Area (GB3096-93)) Table 1.8.2-2 Noise Limit for Construction Site Boundary (GB 12523-90) ) Table 1.8.3-1 Environmental Quality Standard for Surface Water (GB3838-2002) Table 1.8.3-2 Integrated Wastewater discharge Standard Table 1.8.4 Soil Corrosion Intensity Classification Table 2.4-1 Quantity of Major Works Table 2.4-2 Key Teclnical Parameters Table 2.4.1-1 Super Large Bridge alongAlternative K Table 2.4.1-2 Super Large Bridge of Alternative B Table 2.4.2-1 Super Large and Large Tunnel under Alternative K Table 2.4.2-1 Super Large and Large Tunnel under Alternative B Table 2.4.3-1 Interchange under Alternative K Table 2.4.3-2 Interchanges underAlternative B Table 2.4.4 Main Connecting Roads Table 2.5 Summary of Expressway Supporting Facilities Table 2.7-1 Traffic Volume Projection for Alternative K Table 2.7-2 Traffic Volume Projection for Alternative B Table 3.1.2-1 Averaged Value of Climatic Factors for three Years in Shiyan City (2000-2002) Table 3.1.2-2 Distribution of Atmospheric Stability of One Year Table 3.1.2-3 Average Wind Speed and Direction Frequency (2000-2003) Table 3.1.2-4 United Frequency of Wind Direction and Speed Stability Table 3.1.3-1 Hydrological Features in the Project Area Table 3.1.3-2 Hydrological Factors of Du and Tian Rivers Table 3.1.4 Navigation Conditions of Han River Table 3.2.4-1 List of Amphibian Animal in the Project Area Table 3.2.4-2 List of Reptile Animal in the Project Area Table 3.2.4-3 List of Birds in the Project Area Table 3.2.4-3 (continue) List of Birds in the Project Area Table 4.2.4-4 List of Mammals in the Project Area Table 3.2.4-5 Summary of Flora System in the Assessment Area Table 3.3.1-1 Statistics of Population Table 3.3.1-2 Land and Cultivated Land Table 3.3.1-3 Main Economic Indicators in ProjectArea Table 3.3.2-1 Summarizes the primary agricultural products in the project area. Table 3.3.2-2 Statistics for Cultivated Land of Counties Table 3.3.2-3 Statistics for Cultivated Land of Townships Table 3.3.2-4 Agricultural Structure in the Project Area4 Table 3.3.2-5 Proportion of Agricultural Output in Industrial and Agricultural Output Table 3.3.3-1 Personal Income in Project Area Table 3.3.3-2 Statistics of Cultural and Sanitation Sectors (Rear 2001) Table 3.3.3-3 Statistics of 16 Kinds of Diseases in Shiyan City Table 3.4-1 Sensitive Receptors to Noise and Ambient Air Impacts Table 3.4-2 Schools and Hospitals to be Affected Table 3.4-3 Sensitive Receptors along Shiyan Connecting Road Table 3.4-4 Sensitive receptors along Alternative B Table 3.4-5 Summary of Monitoring Points Table 3 .4-6 Result of Noise Monitoring Table 3.4-7 Monitoring Items and Analysis Method for Water Quality Table 3.4-8 Arrangement of Monitoring Points and Sampling Method Table 3.4-9 Water Quality Monitoring Result Unit: mg/l (except pH) Table 3.4-1 0 Standard Compliance Rate Table 3.4-11 Location and Items of Air Monitoring Exercise Table 3.4-12 Monitoring Items and Analysis Method for Air Quality Table 3.4-13 Air Quality Monitoring Result Table 3.4-14 Standard Compliance Rate Table 4.1-1 Identification of Environmental Impacts Table 4.1-2 Matrix for Environmental Impacts Table 4.2.1-1 Summary of Land Occupation Table 4.2.1-2 Projection result for Soil Erosion during Construction Phase Table 4.2.1-3 Effect of Vegetation Cover Table 4.2.1-4 Projection result of Soil Erosion Table 4.2.2-1 Summary of Deposit Sites Table 4.2.2-2 Summary of Borrow Pits Table 4.2.2-2 Summary of Spoil produced by Super and Large Tunnel Table 4.2.2-4 Summary of Construction Material Sources Table 4.2.2-4 Recommended Project Packaging Scheme (ICB) Table 4.2.6-1 Integrated Analysis of Eco-environment Impact Table 4.2.6-2 Criteria for Eco-environment Impact Categorization Table 4.2.6-3 Result of Integrated Analysis of Eco-environment Impact of Shiyan city and Yun and Yunxi counties Table 4.3.3-1 Road Supporting Facilities Table 4.3.3-2 Wastewater Discharge from Jinyinshan Service Zone Table 4.3.4-1 Pollutant Concentration of Road Surface Run-off Table 4.3.4-2 Road Surface Run-off Flow Table 4.3.4-3 Modeling Result of Road Surface Run-off Impact Table 4.3.5-1 Statistical Information for Traffic Accident on Guang-Shan Road Table 4.3.5-2 Qi for Each Road Section Table 4.3.5-3 Likelihood of Traffic Accident on Each River Course Table 4.4.1-1 Monitored Noise Level from Construction Equipment Table 4.4.1-2 Predicted Noise Level from the Construction Equipment. Table 4.4.1-3 Projected Noise Level on Main Roads Table 4.4.2-1 Classification of Vehicles Table 4.4.2-2 Constant K-) Table 4.4.2-3 The amended noise level ALsujrface Table 4.4.2-4 Determination of AL2 hurst Table 4.4.2-5 Determination ofAL2 Table 4.4.2-6 Projected Noise Level for Operation Phase Table 4.4.2-7 Projected Noise Level at the Sensitive Receptors Table 4.4.2-8 Projected Noise Level at Sensitive Receptors (School and Hospital) Table 4.5.1-1 Monitoring Result for Air-borne Dust on Jing-Jin-Tang Expressway in Construction phase Table 4.5.1-2 Result of Water Spraying Table 4.5.1-3 The monitoring results of asphalt smoke discharge concentrations of asphalt blending stations along the South Section of the Beijing-Zlluhai Highway Table 4.5.2-1 Recommended Eijn Table 4.5.2-2 Emission Intensity Table 4.5.2-3 Calculation Conditions for Projection of Air Pollutant Concentration Table 4.5.2-4 projected concentration of Air Pollutant (NO2) Table 4.5.2-5 Projected Concentration of NO2 at Sensitive Receptor Table 4.5.5 Comparison of pollutant discharge between 209, Yun-Man road and the proposed road year 2028 Table 4.6.1-1 Economic Status of Roadside Areas in 2000 Table 4.6.2-1 Land Occupation in the Affected Area Table 4.6.2-2 Permanent Land Occupation (land acquisition range) Table 4.6.2-3 Permanent Land Occupation Table 4.6.2-4 Land resumption and creation plan Table 4.6.3 Parameters of Passage Table 4.6.4-1 Summary of the Construction Camps Table 4.6.4-2 Access Roads Table 4.6.4-3 Impacts of access roads on resident's areas, schools and hospitals Table 4.6.6 Cultural Heritage in the Affected Area Table 4.6.8 Design CO Content 6 Table 4.6.9 Summary of Viaducts Table 4.7.2-1 Tourists Volume Forecast Table 4.7.2-2 Projected Demand for Hotel Service Table 4.7.2-3 Projected Domestic Wastewater Flow Table 4.7.3 Record of Consultation for the Proposed Viaducts Table 4.8.1-1 Summary of House Demolition and Land Acquisition Table 4.8.1-2 Summary of House Demolition Table 4.8.1-3 Summary of Auxiliary Structures/Facilities Table 4.8.2-1 Summary of Compensation Standard Table 4.8.2-2 Compensation Standard for Infrastructure Table 4.8.2-3 Compensation Standard for Auxiliary Structures/Facilities Table 4.8.3-1 Staffing of the Implementing Agencies Table 4.8.3-2 Training Plan Table 4.8.5 Cost Estimate for Resettlement Table 5.1.1 Comparison of Three Possible Transportation Corridors Between Shiyan to Xian Table 5.1.2-1 Work Quantity and Cost Estimates Table 5.1.2-2 Permanent Acquisition of Land Table 5.1.3-1 Land Occupation and Soil Erosion Table 5.1.3-2 Permanent Occupation of Land Table 5.1.3-3 Wild Animals and Plants Table 5.1.3-4 Water Quality Impact Table 5.1.3-5 Safety Issue Table 5.1.3-6 Cultural Sites Table 5.1.3-7 Acoustic Environment Impact Table 5.1.4 Social Environment Impact Table 5.1.5 Result of Comprehensive Comparison Table 5.2.2-1 Engineering Features of AI and Corresponding K Section Table 5.2.2-2 Environmental and Socio-economic comparison of Options Al and K Table 5.2.2-3 Engineering Features of A2 and Corresponding K Section Table 5.2.2-4 Environmental and Socio-Economnic Comparison of Options A2 and K Table 5.2.2-5 Engineering Features of Options A3 and K Table 5.2.2-6 Environmental and Socio-Economic Comparison of Options A3 and K Table 5.2.2-7 Key Engineering Features of Options A3 and K Table 5.2.2-8 Environmental and Socio-Economic Comparison of Options A4 and K Table 5.2.2-9 Key En-gineering Features of Options AO and K Table 5.2.2-10 Environmental and Socio-Economic Comparison of Options AO and K Table 5.2.2-11 Key Engineering Features of Options B I and K Table 5.2.2-12 Environmental and Socio-Economic Comparison of Options BI and K Table 5.2.2-13 Key Engineering Features of Options B2 and K Table 5.2.2-14 Environmental and Socio-Economic Comparison of Options B32and K Table 5.2.2-13 Key Engineering Features of Options B3 and K Table 5.2.2-14 Environmental and Socio-Economic Comparison of Options B3 and K Table 5.2.2-15 Key Engineering Features of Options B4 and K Table 5.2.2-16 Environmental and Socio-Economic Comparison of Options B4 and K Table 5.3-1 Traffic Volume Projection for Without Project Scenario Table 5.3-2 With and Without Project Table 6.1.5-1 Access Roads and Main Mitigation Table 6.1.5-2 Summary of Restoration Measures at Large Construction Site Table 6.1.5-3 Summary of Deposit Sites and Restoration Measures Table 6.1.5-4 Locations of Borrow Pits and Restoration Measures Table 6.1.5-5 Locations of Material Sites and Restoration Measures Table 6.1.6-1 Mitigation Measure to Noise Impact (residential areas) Table 6.1.6-2 Mitigation Measures to Noise Impact (Schools) Table 7.1.1-1 Responsibilities for Environmental Management Organizations Table 7.1.2 Main Responsibilities for Supervision Organizations Table 7.2-1 Impact Mitigation Measures Table 7.2-2 Mannings of environment management & supervision organizations Table 7.4.3-1 Monitoring P]an forAAmbientAir Quality Table 7.4.3-2 Monitoring Plan forAcoustic Quality Table 7.4.3-3 Monitoring Plan for Surface Water Quality Table 7.5 Personnel Training Program Table 7.5-2 Training on site Table 7.6.2-1 Capital Cost for Environmental Protection Measures Table 7.6.2-2 Cost included in Main Engineering Table 7.6.3 Operating Cost for Environmental Facilities Table 8.2-1 Public Consultation Phasing and Goals Table 8.2-2 Questionnaire Used in the Public Consultation Table 8.3 Responses to the Questionnaire Table 8.6 Record of Public Opinion Table 8.7 Places for Information Disciosure Table 1 Result of Noise Projection under Alignment K Table 2 Result of Noise Projection under Alignment B Table 3 Mitigation Measure to Noise Impact (alternative K)
list Figure Figure 1.5 Technical procedure for EA Figure 2.1 Geographical Location Figure 2.3 The contracted Map of Prepared Alignments Project Figure 2.3.1 Locations of these three corridors Figure 3.1.3 the river system within the project area Figure 3.2.4 Main distribution of wild animals in the pro ject area Figure 3.2.5 Current Situation of soil Erosion drawing Figure 3.3.5 The locations of cultural property Figure 5.5.6 The geographical relations among alignment K and Option 3 and the Dinosaur Egg Fossils Nature Reserve Area in the Qinglong Mountain Figure 8.2.3 The locations of Public Consultation and Information Disclosure EnviionmntrllnipactAssessment For Shii toManchuanigan Section of Ymwu inter-Pmvincial HightayProject
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Project Background
Transportation infrastructure in western China has had a significant development since the Reform and Opening-up Policy was introduced in the 1980s. However constrained by the geograpliical location, lack of investment and slow social and economic growth, the gap in transportation development between the western and eastern Clhina lhas become increasingly noticeable. In the context of the national strategy to develop western China, thle infrastructure system will have a substantial expansion in the region within the next 10 years. Consistent with the strategy, the Ministry of Communication (MOC) has drawn up an initiative for transport sector development for this region. The proposed Yinwu Tnter-Provincial Highway Project is one of the comrponents to be carried out under this initiative. According to the strategic planning of the MOC, the proposed Yinwu Inter-Provincial Highway will cross Ningxia, Gansu, Shaanxi and Hubei provinces. The key cities to be linked by the proposed expressway will include Yinchuan and Guyuan of Ningxia Province, Pingliang of Gansu Province, Xianyang and Xi'an of Shaanxi Province, and Shiyan and Wuhan of Hubei Province. In 2002, a site reconnaissance team has been mobilized by the MOC to determine the alignment of the proposed expressway. Manchuanguan City has been determined as an inter-provincial bordering point of the highway between Hubei and Shaanxi Provinces.
The highway section within Ningxia and Gansu Provinces under the proposed project is totally 402 km. Of this length, the 217 km Yinchuan-Tongxin section has been constructed while the feasibility study report for the Tongxi-Yanzi section has been approved by the planning authority. The feasibility study report for the 296 kmr highway section within Gansu Province has been submitted for approval. Of the 341 km highway within Shaanxi Province, the 24 kin Xian-Lantian section has been built and become operational while the 64 kin Lantian-Shangluo section will be constructed soon and the remaining sections will be constructed within the period of the Tenth-Five year period (2001 -2005). Of the 485 kin highway within Hubei Province, the 378 km Shiyan-Wuhan section is being constructed and will become operational at the end of the Tenth-Five year period. For the entire inter-provincial highway, the section linking Shangluo and Shiyan, about 200 kin, is the only section yet to start preparation for construction. Of this section, Shangluo to Manchuanguan, a sectin about 94 km in the Shaanxi province is now under design and environmental assessment. The EA TOR has been submitted (end of March 2004) and the EA report is expected to be ocmpleted by the end of May 2004 and approved by SEPA buy the end of June. Under the current plan, this section of the expressway will start construction by the end of 2004. Therefore, it is apparently urgent to construct this last section of the expressway (Manchuanguan to Shiyan) so that the whole Xi'an-Wuhan expressway becomes operational to support the expected economic benefits to the region. In 2000, Hubei Provincial Communication Department (HPCD) listed the proposed Yinwu Inter-Provincial Highway project as a higlh priority project and designated Hubei Highway Bureau as the implementing agency. Contracted by Hubei Highway Bureau, Hubei Provincial Transport Planning and Design Institute has prepared the preliminary study report for the proposed Yinwu Inter-Provincial Highway project. In December 2000, the preliminiary study report passed the review panel jointly formed by members from Hubei Planning Committee and HPCD. In 2001, the same design institute conducted the feasibility study for this proposed project.
The proposed Shiyan to Manclhuanguan section of the Yinwu Inter-provincial Highway (the Shiman Expressway, or the Project) will start from Xujiapeng, and connect with the Hanshi expressway at Wuxu section which opened to traffic in December 2003. It will pass Shiyan City (Maojian District and Zhangwan District), Yun County and Yunxi County, and finally end at Manchuanguan Town of Shaanxi Province through a tunnel. The ending point of the proposed project is the tunnel (the Hubei and Shaanxi provincial border is the river where the tunnel is located). The total length of the expressway is 105.86 kin. For better construction management, following consultation with Shaalnxi Provincial Communication Department, the Shaanxi section of the Manchuanguan tunnel will be included into this project in the preliminary design, which started in May 2003. After this inclusion, the total length of the expressway will be 106.819 kim. Of this length, 105.099 kin will be financed by a World Bank loan
Second Navigation Survey and Design Institute, the Ministry of Communication Fini-rmntal ]patAsssinait For Shiyan toMandiuanguan Setion of YinwuIliter-Provincial Higiway Project while the 1.72 section within the Shaanxi province will not be included in the loan project.
The revised feasibility study report for the proposed project was prepared in November 2002 and submitted to the State Development and Planning Committee (now restructured as National Development and Reform Commission or NDRC) for approval whih was received on February 20, 2004. According to the comments from a World Bank mission, the preliminary design work was opened for bid and Hubei Provincial Communication Planning and Design Institute and Zhongjiao No.2 Highway Exploration, Design and Research Institute won the bid. The preliminary design started in May and the draft preliminary design has completed in September 2003, and was reviewed by a Spanish engineering firm, which had then been revised by the end of February 2004.
1.2 Progress of EA
In March 2002, the Second Navigation Engineering Reconnaissance and Design Institute (NERDI) was retained by the Hubei Transport Bureau to undertake Environmental Assessment (EA) for this project.
An EA team was formed in November 2001. The EA team conduLcted the first-round site investigation, initial data collection and the various forms of consultation with affected public, non-government organizations and local governments in December 2001 along the proposed project alignment. A Terms of Reference (TOR) for the EA was then prepared in August 2002. Based on the revised feasibility study, the EA team carried out the second round of site investigation in December 2002. An environmental baseline monitoring program was then initiated to cover the project area. On the basis of the site investigation, information collection and analysis, and baseline monitoring, the TOR was revised and submitted to the SEPA and the World Bank for review in December 2002. The TOR for the EA has been approved by the SEPA on1December 16, 2002.
Following comments of the Aide-Memorie of the Bank mission in February 17-Macrh 8, the EA covers the affected area (as related to two proposed alignments), connection roads (less than 10 krn), temporary access roads, construction camps, borrow pits and spoil disposal sites. On such basis, the EA team then conducted additional site investigation during March 20-27 2003 and further public consultation including related agencies for the preparation of the EA documentation. A draft EA report was submitted to the World Bank in June 2003.
During the preliminary design stage, the EA team provided requirements to the alignment determination from the environmental perspective, including minimizing the occupation of agricultural land and resettlement, balancing wher-e possible the excavation and filling in order to minimizinig the amounlt of spoil soils requiring disposal, selecting waste land for spoil soil disposal, avoiding environmentally sensitive areas, etc. The EA team further participated in the alignment selection and.determination, providing environmental input in the process.
On July 15, the HPCD held a tele-conference with the World Bank representatives for review of the draft EA report. Additional field investigation was conducted following the conference, in August 11-16. This document is a revised EA report incorporating the World Bank and other reviewers' comments from the conference. Through the review of the World Bank Delegation from October 5 to 25, 2003, EIA of the third version is prepared according to the Memorandum of the World Bank Delegation. In March 7-14, 2004, the World Bank appraised the EIA report and provided additional comments. The current version has incorporated those comments as well as those from SEPA review.
The EA for connection roads, which are more than I0 kin, and the rural roads will be separately carried out by another institute contracted to Shanghai Ship and Shpping Research Instistue by Hubei Transport Bureau.
1.3 Purpose of EA
The EA predicts various environimental and socio-economic impacts of the Project, and analyzes the impacts quantitatively or qualitatively through investigation or monitoring of the physical, biological,
Second Navigation Survey and Design Institute, the Ministry of Communication 2 EnvimnmentalEThdAs-fseltForShiyantoManchuanguan Secoa ofYinwu Inter-Provincial HighwayProjnct and socio-economic environment, and through public consultation along the project area. More specifically, the purposes of the EA are:
To improve the decision-making process by introducing environmental criteria and assessment to design engineers and decision makers and to ensure the Project is environmentally sound and sustainable; To ensure adverse environmental impacts be identified and evaluated in the earlier stage of the Project development so as to develop appropriate measures including alternative alignments and designs to avoid, mitigate, reduce or othervise minimize the adverse impacts to acceptable levels; To develop measures of compensation for the impacts which could not be avoided or mitigated; and; To provide a basis for Project executing agency and relevant government agencies to develop and implement plans for environmnental management and monitoring.
1.4Basis of Assessment
1.4.lWorld Bank Requirements
The World Bank requirements include primarily the Bank's ten safeguards policies, including Operational Policies (OP), Best Procedure (BP), Good Practice (GP) and Operational Directives (OD). They are:
* Environmental Assessment (OP/BP/GP4.01); * Forestry (OP/GP4.3 6); * Natural Habitats (OP/BP4.04); * Safety of Dams (OP/BP4.37); * Pest Management (OP4.09); * Involuntary Resettlement (OP4. 12); * Indigenous People (OD4.20); * Cultural Propertv (OP4. 11); * Projects in Disputed Areas (OP/BP/GP7.60); and * Projects on International Waterways (OP/BP/GP7.50).
Among these safeguards policies, Environmental Assessment (OP 4.0 ) is the primary requiremenits and thus the focus of this report. In addition, policies on1 Natural Habitat (OP4.04), Pest Management (OP4.09, Indigenous People (OD4.20) and Forest (OP4.36) are also applied in the EA at least in the screening stage or in the full process if triggered.
In addition, a professional archaeological team is contracted to carry out the assessment on cultural property, and a resettlement team is responsible for the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP). Major findings and conclusions of these two reports will be included in this EA.
Since no project componenits will involve international waterways, dam construction or disputed areas as defined in OP7.60 and indigenous people, policies related to these subjects are not applied in the EA.
1.4.2National laws and regulations
(1)Environmental Protection Law of PRC, December 26, 1989; (2)Enviroiunental Impact Assessment Law of the PRC, October 28, 2002 (3)Land Management Law of PRC of August, August 29, 1998; (4)Noise Pollution Preventioni Law of PRC, October 29, 1996;
Second Navigation Survey and Design Institute, the Ministry of Communication 3 Enviionmenal irpactAsssmwntForShlyantoMancduaniguani SectionofYmiwLilIter-P ovincialHigllauyProject
(5)Air Pollution Prevention Law of PRC, April 29, 2000; (6)Water Pollution Prevention Law of PRC, May 15, 1996; (7)Highway Law of PRC, January 1, 1998; (8)Water and Soil Conservation Law of PRC, June 29, 1991; (9)Rules of Environmental Protection Managemnent for Construction Projects, issued by the State Council of PRC, November 29, 1998; (1O)Classification Inventory for Environment Protection of Engineering Project issued by the SEPA, January 1, 2003; (11) Measures Concerning Environmental Protection and Management for Transportation Construction Projects, issued by MOC, May 22, 1990; and (1ONotice to Strengthein the Environmental Impact Assessment and Management of Construction Projects Financed by Loan from Intermational Financial Organizations, jointly issued by SEPA, the State Planning Commission, the Ministry of Finance and the People's Bank of China, June 21, 1993. (13)Approval Document for the TOR for Environmental Impact Assessmenet for the proposed Slhiyan to Manchuanguan Section of Yinwu Inter-Provincial Highway Project, issued by SEPA on 16 December 2002. Review Comments for Shiyan to Manchuanguan EIA report, SEPA, December 26, 2003.
1.4.3Project Study Document
* Feasibility Study Report for the Shiyan to Manchuanguan Section of Yinwu Inter-Provincial Highway Project, prepared by Hubei Provincial Transport Planning and Design Institute, Jan. 2003. * Preliminary Designs of Two Stages for the Shiyan to Manchuanguan Section of Yinwu Inter-Provincial Highway Project, prepared by Hubei Provincial Transport Planning and Design Institute, and Zhongjiao No.2 Highway Exploration and Design Institute, Oct. 2003
1.4.41nternational Environmental Agreements (where China is a signing party)
* UN Framework Confer on Climate Change, May 9, 1992; and Biologic diversity Agreement, signed on December 29, 1993.
1.4.50ther Study Documents Related to the Project
* Resettlement Action Plan for the Shiman Highway Project, prepared by Hubei Provincial Communication Department, March 2004; * Cultural Property Survey Report for the Shiman Highway Project, prepared by the Archeological and Relic Survey Institute of Hubei, June 2003.
1.5Procedure of EA
Key EA steps and procedures, as well as their inter-relationiships are schematically illustrated in Figure 1.5-1.
Second Navigation Survey and Design Institute, the Ministry of Communication 4 EF xlvmitiita tAssmtFo! ShitoManchutnguan SectioI ofYinw-u Ptr-PovitcialHiAyProject
Figure 1.5 Technical procedure for EA
=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Contract
| ~~EA team SEA PC
Site investigation
S. Public Submission CD
Development of TOR
> ~~Appro val to TOR
Collection of baseline data Environmental Baseline monitoring Analysis of baseline
Assessment of environment baseline
EA
Public consultation D Mitigation measure
EMP | Integrated analysis ,
/ 1 | ~~~~~~~~~~~imnqntc
| Alternative comparison | Preparation of EA | Submission | rinr:i impritptinn
Preparation of EMP Sbiso Review
Second Navigation Survey anid Design Tristitute, the MinIStbY of Commiunicationi EirnienetallsnpactAssessentFor SiiantoMandLklgua Seion ofY-mwuiliteioPrvincialHig[I'AyP'ojet
1.6 Scope of the EA
The EA determined the scope of assessment following the requirements on the scope of work stipulated in the Scope of Work for Highway Construction Environmental Impact Assessmenit (Interim) and the past experience on similar expressway projects. The actual assessment was conducted in three stages. First, the assessment focused on corridor identification and selection among the three possible corridors between Shiyall to Xi'an. Once the optimal corridor was selected, two possible alignments within the corridor were identified, evaluated and determined. On this basis, an environmentally optimal alignment (the Alternative K based on the Alternative A) was selected. In the tlhird stage, a detailed assessment on Alternative K was conducted including comparison of 9 sections on this alternative alignment in greater details. Following the above three stages, an optimal alignment is identified and a comprehensive environmenital assessment has been conducted on this selected alignment.
The EA coverage for this project is presented in the following Table 1.6-1.
Table 1.6-1 Scopes of Environmental Assessment Items EA Coverage Socio-economic/cultural Areas within 200 m from the road, and tliose to be directly impacted by enviromnent the projbect. Biological environment Areas within 300 m from the road. Borrow and deposit area and land for temporary occupation Acoustic environment Areas within 200 m from the road's central line. Ambient air environment Areas within 200 m from the i-oad's central line. Water enviromnent Areas within 200 m upper stream and 1000 m downstream from bridges; within 200 m upper stream and dowvnstream from bridges in normal water area, 1000 m downstream from the outfall of service zone Scenic spot The scenic spot area to attract more tourists after the project Cultural property Areas within 200 m from the road's central line, and borrow pit and deposit site
1.7 Methodology of EA
The EA applies as its principle for the methodology of focusing on kVey (sensitive) sites, cover selected sections and reflecting the entire project area.
Site investigation and collected data analysis are the primary methods for the assessment of social and economic impacts, as well as ecosystem impacts assessment. Mathematical models are is applied for assessinig acoustic environmenit and ambient air impacts. Analogy analysis method is applied for assessing soil corrosioni and water environment.
1.8Applicable Standard for EA
Second Navigation Survey and Design institute, the Ministry of Communication 6 Environental ImpactAssess-ent For Shiyan to Manchuangian Setion ofYinwulintei-Piuvincial Higlvway Project
According to the Technical Guideline for EA and EA Specifications for Road Proj-ect (pilot edition), the following standards are applied for the EA.
1.8.lAmbient Air
According to the Ambient Air Quality Standard (GB3095-1996), the air quality for the mixed area is evaluated against Class II, which is listed in Table 1.8.1-1.
3 Table 1.8.1-1 Class II of Ambient Air Quality Standard (GB3095-1996) unit: mg/Nm Pollutant _ Measure NO2 TSP PM,0 Daily average 0.12 0.3 0.15 Hourly average 0.24 /
The air pollutant discharge will be evaluated against Class II of Integrated Discharge StandardforAirPollutant (GB6297-1996), which is listed in Table 1.8.1-2 beloW.
Table 1.8.1-2 Integrated Discharge Standard for Air Pollutant (GB6297-1996) Pollutant Max. Max. Discharge velocity (kg/h) Concenitration Concentration Height of chimney Class 1I limits (mg/m3 ) limit (mg/mn3) (m) TSP 15 3.5 1.0 for the 120 20 5.9 boundary of site 30 23 3 Benzoapyr 15 0.05 x ]0-3 0.008[Lg/rn for ene 0.3 x I 0- 20 0.085 x Io-, the site 30 0.29 X IO- bOLlundary Asphalt 15 0o18 smoke* 75 20 0.30 30 . 1.3 *Asphalt smoke refers to liquid hydrocarboni organic particles and a small amount of gaseous hydrocarbons under atmospheric temperature vented and discharged during production of petroleum asphalt and asphalt products. 1.8.2Acoustic environment
Noise Limits for Construction Site (GB12523-90) are applied in the assessment for noise impacts in construction phase. For residential areas, Class IV of Standardof Environmental Noise of Urban Area (GB3096-93) is applied for assessment of noise impact in the operation phase. For sensitive receptors such as schools, hospitals senior houses and kindergartens, the more stringent standards, Class I, in GB3096-93 is applied. Detailed standards are given in Table 1.8.2-1 and 1.8.2-2. Class 11 of Standardl of Environmental Noise of UrbanArea (GB3096-93) is applied for evii-onirnment baseline assessment.
Second Navigation Survey and Design Institute, the Ministry of Communication 7 Envimnjnn lpactAssessmentFor ShiyantoMaNchuanguan Secioni ofYinwulntei-PrvincialHigh'xayProject
Table 1.8.2-1 Standards of Environmental Noise in Urban Area (GB3096-93) unit: dB(A) Classification Daytime Nighttime Applicable zone 1 55 45 Zones of education, health recovery, etc. 2 60 55 4 70 55 Both sides of trunk roads
Table 1.8.2-2 Noise Limit for Construction Site Boundary (GB12523-90) Unit: dB(A) Construction stage Major source of noise Noise limit Daytime Night time Earth & stone work Bulldozer, excavator, loader, etc. 75 55 Piling Pile driver, etc. 85 Forbidden Structuring Concrete mixer, etc. 70 55 Finishing Crane, elevator 65 55
1.8.3Surface Water
Han River (K30+249), Tian River (K62+398) and Du River (BK28+455) will be evaluated using Class II of Environmental Quality StandardforSurface Water (GB33838-2002) based on the applicable EA guidelines and quality classification of these surface wvater bodies. Class III of the standard is applied to assess the water body receiving wastewater from the service zone, details are presented in Table 1.8.3-1.
Table 1.8.3-1 Environmental Quality Standard for Surface Water (GB3838-2002) mg/I Item pH Permalganate Oil TP SS
Class 11 6-9 4 0.05 0.1 Class III 6-9 6 0.05 0.2
Class I of the Integrated Wastewater discharge Standard (GB8978-1996) is aipplied for wastewater discharge, detailed standards are presented in Table 1.8.3-2. Table 1.8.3-2 Integrated Wastewater discharge Standard (unit: mg/I)
Pollutant Ss COD cr BOD5 Oils Class I 70 100 20 10
1.8.4 Soil Erosion
EA Specifications for Road Project (interim edition) has been applied to assess soil corrosion conditions of the project area, the indicators for classification are presented in Table 1.8.3-4 below.
Second Navigation Survey and Design Tnstitute, the Ministry of Communuication 8 EnvitnnrrailIntactA.sssnentFor Shiry toManchmiguan Secion ofYinvwu Inter-Provincial HighvvayPoject
Table 1.8.4 Soil Corrosion Intensity Classification Class Corrosion ratio (t/kn2 .year) I Weak corrosion (with apparent trace) 1000 II minor corrosion 1000-2500 III moderate corrosion 2500-5000 IV strong corrosion 5000-8000 V Significant corrosion 8000-15000 VI Severe corrosion >15000
1.9 EA Teams
(1) EA Team
The Second Navigation Engineering Reconnaissance and Design Institute is the heading unit of the EA team. This institute has the Class A license for EA tas]k issued by the SEPA. Professionals covering every aspects have formed the rich resource of the institute. There are many specialized entities under the institute, such as design company, site reconnaissance company, construction company, construction design company, construction supervision company and EA division.
This institute, with EA certificate of the institute of National Class A, 2603, has completed dozens of EA tasks for road anid large bridge projects also it is experienced on several projects financed by World Bank or Asian Development Banik. * Key members of the lead EA team Director Luo Xianqing senior engineer License No. A2603 0002 Chief engineer Fang Jianzhanig senior engineer License No. A26030003 Project manager Yu Jinbiao senior enginieer License No. A26030005 * Key Members of cooperating EA team Life Science College of Huazhong Normal University is responsible for the eco-environment assessment Liu Shengxiang Professor Ecology Wang Kehua Master Ecology Zhang Hongxia Master Ecology Yang Shaozong Lecturer Ecology * Key members of envir-onmental monitoring team EnvirQnmental Monitoring Center of Shiyan City is responisible for the envi.ronmental baseline monitoring Yang Zufa senior enginieer (director) Enviro-nmenital monitoring Liu Gang seniior engineer Environmiiienital monitoring Wang Jian senior engineer Environlmenital monitoring * Other teams involved in the project development stage Hubei provincial Archeological Research Institute is responisible for the assessment of cultural property Huang Wenxi deputy researcher cultural relic protection Zhu Hengfu deputy researcher cultural relic protection Wu Xianzhu deputy researcher cultural relic protection Huang Yuhong deputy researcher cultural relic protection Economic Research College of Wuhan University is responsible for the RAP Zhong Shuiying Professor Social economist Cheng Dening Professor Social economist
Second Navigation Survey and Design Institute, the Ministry of Communication 9 Envionmienal InptAsAssnent Fo- Shiyan to Marhonguan Section of Yinwu inter-Povincial Highway Ptject
Wei Shan Lecturer Social economiiist
(2) Reviewer and Independent EA Consultant
This EA report has been reviewed by HPCD and DLEX Enterprises Corp., of Canada that is an environmental consulting firm and engaged as an independent consultant for the EA for this project.
(3) Declaration
The EA teams ensure the Chinese and English versions of the EA documenits be basically the same. Except the minior discrepancies in English translation due to the different expressions of the languages, there is no difference of substanice in the two versions of the documents.
The TOR for this EA was submitted to SEPA oni December- 16, 2003 and has subsequently received its approval. The final EIA report was submitted to SEPA and was reviewed and approved by SEPA on December 26, 2003.
Second Navigation Survey and Design Institute, the Ministry of Communicationi 10 EnvitnnhipdAssessTetFor SliyantoManchuanguan Section of Yinwilhiter-Pfovi-cial HighayPioject
Chapter 2 Project Overview
2.1 Geographical Location Hubei province is located in central China, about the middle section of the Yangtze River. The province is bordered by Henan province to the north, Hulnan and Jiangxi provinces to the south, Anhui province to the east, and Sichuan and Shaanxi province to the west. The Yangtze River crosses the province from west to east while Beijing to Gualngzhou and Beijing to Jiulong railways cross the province from north to sotuth. Geographical Location are show future 2. 1.
This proposed Shiyan to Manchuanguan section of the Yinwu intra-provincial higlhway is located in the central area of Qin-Ba mountainous region in the northwest of Hubei province. Ground elevations are ranged from 1200 in in nor-tlhwest to 200 m towards southeast. The entire highway is within the Shiyan Municipality and the alignment is roughly orientated from northiwest to southeast. The highway will start from Xujiapeng, which is the end of the Xiangfan to Shiyan highway, througlh Maojian District, Zhangwan District, Yun County, Yunxi County and end at Manchuanguan at the Hubei-Shaanxi provincial border.
2.2 Affected Area The proposed road will pass thirouglh Maojian District, Zhiangwan District, YL,n Counlty and Yunxi County under the jurisdiction of Shiyan municipality. The area to be directly affected by the project covers Maojian and Zlhangwan Districts, Yun and Yunxi Counties.
2.3 Alignment Corridor
Two alternative alignments, i.e. Alternative A and Alternative B, have been screelned for detailed analysis and comparison in view of the geographical, topography and geological constraints. Alternative A has been optimized at the stage of preliminary design, in the following text of this report, Alternative A is referred as Alternative K.
The proposed highway section will start from Xujiapeng and connects at the WLu-Xu section with Hanshi expressway, which is currently under construction. From tllere it will extend along Tongshugou before reaching Caijiagou through a channiiel. The lhighway section will then cross the Dongfeng Tire Plant railway at Tumeen and the 209 national highway (G209) before reaching Shuangloumen along the G209
From Shuanigloumen, the higlhway section will turn north and extend along G209 to Hejiaya before getting into Yun County. From Yun County, it continues to go to Mulongzui. Then the road is aligned to the northwest and get to Zhangj iawo where it crosses Han River.
After crossing Han River, the highway section turn northwest again and runs to Yanwan at which it crosses Quyuan River. Crossing Jiebaiguan through a tunnel, the highway section gets into Yunxi County and extends along Yun-Man road to Tianheping after crossing Tian River.
Along the south bank of Tian River, the highway section extends to Jiucaiya. And it cross the Yun-Man road and Tian-River, continues to go to Kejiawani through Guandimiao and
Second Navigation Survey anid Design Institute, the Ministry of Communication 11 EnIvirmlental rnpctAssessne t For SlhiyantoManchuangun SeLfon ofYimwuInier-Pomncial Highwvay Projet
Tumen Town. Then it arrives at Bamnudi (the confluence of Alternative A and B) through a tunnel. Through Xiangkou, Shangxianigkou, Lishiguan anid Erdaoya, the highway section arrives at the end of section at Manchuanguan Town through1 a tunnel (the provincial bounder of Hubei and Shaanxi is at the watershed of the tunnel).
The key control points of Alternative K are: Shiyan East Interchlange at start, the interchange crossing the Hanjiang Road of Shiyan urban area, Shuangloumllen (Shiyan Interchange), Maoping, Mulongzui (Yun County Interclhange), Zhangjiagou (Han River Bridge), Qingqu (Qingqu Interchange), Jiebeiguan, Jianliupu, Hejiadian, Huocheling, Hongyanzi, Yunxi County Seat planned area, Wangj iataizi (Yunxi Inferchange), Huanglongdong, Badouzhuang, Erdaoya, Jiaochangguani, Luomnadian (Shaiigjin Interchange), and Manchuanguani (Yunling Tunnel).
The total length of this alignmenit is 106.819 km, incltiding 1 05.099 km in Hubei province to be financed partially by a World Bank loan and 1.72 kill in Shaanlxi province.
Figure 2.3 shows the proposed alignments of the project, Alternative K and Alternative B.
2.4 Construction Scale and Technical Standards
According to the Technical Stanidards for Road Works issued by the MOC, this highway section will be a 4-lane, controlled access expressway with the designed motor vehicle speed of 80 km/h. Tables 2.4-1 anid 2.4-2 show the quantity of major works and the key technical parameters.
Table 2.4-1 Quantity of Major Works
Item Unit Parameter Alternative K Alternative B Constructed length of road Km 105.099 108.965 Designed traffic speed km/h 80 80 Designed traffic volume (car) Vehicle/d 4194 9 38537 Land occupation Mu 12,605.5 105338.91 House to be demolislhed m2 189041.7 185653.9 Width of road base M 24.5 24.5 3 Earth work of road base X IO"m 5225 2967.08 Rock work of road base X 103m3 9142 15733.38 2 Asphalt and concrete road surface X I 03n 1633.8 1446.25 Drain and guard system X 103M3 864.3 886.543 Super bridge M/set 9372.25/16 8666/13 Large bridge M/set 17,614.75/74 13598/54 Small-medium bridge M/set 249.7/2 663/9 Super and long tunnel M/set 7948/5 10790/5 Medium and small tunnel M/set 5731/25 8010/22 Culvert Set 126 79 Inter-change interchange Set 6 6 Separate interchange Set 21 2 Passage Set 20 27 Platform bridge Set 4 5 Length of bridge against tunnel °0 39.26 38.27
Service zone and parkinlg zone I Service zolne anld I Servlce zolle and I larking 2 paorkig zones zonie Cost estimated RMB I OS 42.07 47.03 Unit rate per km RMB 104 4002 4316.14
Second Navigation Survey and Design Institute, the Ministry of Communication 12 Legend
-1 .;s\i 0t T1., C. 314r Tw,Tow~~~~ Shyr to Vzncrtaw 0
*s >r,,.r r Di .i,tL<1s;1.s;(itX@_
o PI,sitTie Th8 kz ProvinceL R
Ri~~~~~~~ ..0. 0~~~~~aHeCo
oll Rzekl.r PI TI R. -i z1R- skt 4 4;°t Province hi 'n-
,--';diikI(ii k ^° ",S EzpeessswaCtU0i Dr#(tIgt Sh,itt))D l612&it4 7 F
A1170 nSh E resssuytariFan to It r 0
Sjj D j hollnr.'.-d"W) j-,",ne t I Jt t *'1 '4 t r 0-'-8
.,...... >m.l-...-funi\ °°',_ ¢Gl
0 15 30 45 SOK. o 32 - F e
0 ~~~~~~~3052 i*°Tllt1- \ I K_XiXiangJing ., < .
ChongQing City
*iStsa ^ gtTN ( ~~~~* ''il U.... a '-,l
/ g -4-' ?° 'A'* Z - J S Ift A I i C *0 01 4> '.L r
0 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1
_0 _ . aw - .n rice
161041 am<
I lacl 04 ft Figure 2.1 The Sketch Map of Location of Shiyan to Manchuanguan Project
_-,r-k A HeNan Province
Ex ressway M 0 IF 42 o 0 ei 'A WO)0 OAA. 0 OtA A O AA O 77 0raw. 0 HanShi Expressway gFir, C ti OM06 Iwo ob,I 0 asoi f 40 AJL '' ` **a ' A IO..' *,aO . 0 0- -::.., 0 OVA a SILK* Aim Wit r*-iW* r* t kt 0 WI O P...... \. j 0 1 AnHul :01ma rklom O t 40 Province Is ng u Expre O J Iq O TI,O -vx :-Oft" 4 0 125044W.-O 0 0 1 pressway 0 AO 15 NI T AT
'A 0 V6 .- . Ot Fm. a x ILLU AA IIX) a-'O 0 O uRong Expiressway uplan .0
0
z_ /1- AEA. IL 13 O. in 0 O 0 ;0" V N, T 4 R OsI
Oa* OE -O 0 O 201, .-AKkltA* 0
FF 00
OA& -A OpLbci
Aw YLa
0 IA%I w ki :064 --O MP a AX ngXi Provin e V
A" 4 , -47,
.;4. IL .4,
>K b, a lq
'v,
kx A or) 4:.. co 'r" 4
SO ea
4" Y
A e
4"-,7 1. Z. x
V,
A'. N \,(k
A
V
X e! It4 01
4, arcmaqr ;L.", -X The Extend of Layout V\ Huo In the Prospective Urbai P v L,1,.er xiabeiyu' of*, %4YunXi 7 ngiiaping umen Reseryotr .)- 4, iuc eki an V, f N "Th S,See. n dB Sh
Z Scherre Bl Wmjiapo Tunnel - IZ,
inNinshan y B d 'en Ice Z ndge
Jiaochangpo ceme --1 . . \i. BK iou 4 n n- 1 #;6 A a
iagou Twml' p 4.:: A
R V. A-41 Maintaini W. -N- V. 61 iver
Z. P. A + X, ,<> :,A,
N 10 .yN 14- -.O-.X
0 + ti "rS 64 P ' %I" u )tk_
N
VN
U The In th, 7. of it "k L 'Z r gg Foss is ingsi u 'nosaa E kin., inthe Qirg
lang' av'o cu tp m A iepatgu c eme NHe ,adia T- 4
Tnno' 4 ilu'Kiver- qV iia N Ch F117e E -W- A.
it If 3%,
c^1 anjiang N& Lai- N4 'Aian te gyuan :As; C et
NO W T S n 101
v, X .10 V0. E
lp
X 1W I
_w j _4 1 V lgure 2.3 The Con q Extend of Layout 'p w V" toe Prospecteive Urban Plan " 10- 'A ,, ,rkan 6 vt ncl of La t ,-ospective Urban Plan 4 4 P FY 20. v ';Helia a "'I 1% X _'J.-an
V
I terc N 4. -Scheme Al, " 1*1 -maoping, AN Yinghuaz ,uanyuan A -qiI;agcu T"ngs u cue,
V",, -- 'I 5V, T d N ' : , I ujtapen Duwli: c M.
S-hiNanh lnterc liciiago A T.
0. eiiagounai he Extend of Layout of Shiyan Connecting goa The Cityzone of ShiYan A, Future
V A