Determining the Cooling Age Using Luminescence-Thermochronology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Archaeological Tree-Ring Dating at the Millennium
P1: IAS Journal of Archaeological Research [jar] pp469-jare-369967 June 17, 2002 12:45 Style file version June 4th, 2002 Journal of Archaeological Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 2002 (C 2002) Archaeological Tree-Ring Dating at the Millennium Stephen E. Nash1 Tree-ring analysis provides chronological, environmental, and behavioral data to a wide variety of disciplines related to archaeology including architectural analysis, climatology, ecology, history, hydrology, resource economics, volcanology, and others. The pace of worldwide archaeological tree-ring research has accelerated in the last two decades, and significant contributions have recently been made in archaeological chronology and chronometry, paleoenvironmental reconstruction, and the study of human behavior in both the Old and New Worlds. This paper reviews a sample of recent contributions to tree-ring method, theory, and data, and makes some suggestions for future lines of research. KEY WORDS: dendrochronology; dendroclimatology; crossdating; tree-ring dating. INTRODUCTION Archaeology is a multidisciplinary social science that routinely adopts an- alytical techniques from disparate fields of inquiry to answer questions about human behavior and material culture in the prehistoric, historic, and recent past. Dendrochronology, literally “the study of tree time,” is a multidisciplinary sci- ence that provides chronological and environmental data to an astonishing vari- ety of archaeologically relevant fields of inquiry, including architectural analysis, biology, climatology, economics, -
Scientific Dating of Pleistocene Sites: Guidelines for Best Practice Contents
Consultation Draft Scientific Dating of Pleistocene Sites: Guidelines for Best Practice Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................. 3 PART 1 - OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 3 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 3 The Quaternary stratigraphical framework ........................................................................ 4 Palaeogeography ........................................................................................................... 6 Fitting the archaeological record into this dynamic landscape .............................................. 6 Shorter-timescale division of the Late Pleistocene .............................................................. 7 2. Scientific Dating methods for the Pleistocene ................................................................. 8 Radiometric methods ..................................................................................................... 8 Trapped Charge Methods................................................................................................ 9 Other scientific dating methods ......................................................................................10 Relative dating methods ................................................................................................10 -
Comparison of Detrital Zircon U-Pb and Muscovite 40Ar/39Ar Ages in the Yangtze Sediment: Implications for Provenance Studies
minerals Article Comparison of Detrital Zircon U-Pb and Muscovite 40Ar/39Ar Ages in the Yangtze Sediment: Implications for Provenance Studies Xilin Sun 1,2,* , Klaudia F. Kuiper 2, Yuntao Tian 1, Chang’an Li 3, Zengjie Zhang 1 and Jan R. Wijbrans 2 1 School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; [email protected] (Y.T.); [email protected] (Z.Z.) 2 Department of Earth Sciences, Cluster Geology and Geochemistry, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; [email protected] (K.F.K.); [email protected] (J.R.W.) 3 School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 June 2020; Accepted: 17 July 2020; Published: 20 July 2020 Abstract: Detrital zircon U-Pb and muscovite 40Ar/39Ar dating are useful tools for investigating sediment provenance and regional tectonic histories. However, the two types of data from same sample do not necessarily give consistent results. Here, we compare published detrital muscovite 40Ar/39Ar and zircon U-Pb ages of modern sands from the Yangtze River to reveal potential factors controlling differences in their provenance age signals. Detrital muscovite 40Ar/39Ar ages of the Major tributaries and Main trunk suggest that the Dadu River is a dominant sediment contributor to the lower Yangtze. However, detrital zircon data suggest that the Yalong, Dadu, and Min rivers are the most important sediment suppliers. This difference could be caused by combined effects of lower reaches dilution, laser spot location on zircons and difference in closure temperature and durability between muscovite and zircon. -
Luminescence Dating
1. Introduction and Application 3. Field Supplies and Sampling Luminescence dating is utilized in a number of geologic and archaeologic studies to obtain a depositional (burial) age on alluvium, colluvium, eolian, glacial, marine, paleontological, biological and anthropogenic sediment or rock. Exposure to sufficient sunlight (290-3200nm) or heat (>500°C) will reset any previous luminescence signal to zero. After removal from the stimulation source, ionizing energy from radioactive decay in surrounding sediment/rock (15-30cm) and within the mineral grain will excite atomic orbital electrons- some will get trapped in mineral lattice defects. This trapping and storing effectively acts as a clock and accumulation of electrons will continue until the trap becomes saturated, or a stimulating source aids in their escape back to their original orbit. Upon trap departure, some electrons will Figure 1. Required gear used for tube-sample collection method produce a photon of light when the stored energy is released. in luminescence dating. (A) Measuring tape for burial depth, In the lab, this light energy (luminescence) is then calibrated to important for cosmic DR. (B) For DE sample, OSL sampling tube radiation doses for deriving a geologic radiation dose (metal or other opaque material) sharpened at one end and pre- equivalent, known as Equivalent Dose (DE) in grays (Gy) of loaded with a styrofoam plug on the sharpened end to limit radiation. The natural decay of radioelements in the sediment shaking during pounding. (C) Rubber end caps for tube sedimentary environment and from cosmogenic fall out (up to (tinfoil and duct tape can be substituted if not available). -
Apatite Thermochronology in Modern Geology
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 Apatite thermochronology in modern geology F. LISKER1*, B. VENTURA1 & U. A. GLASMACHER2 1Fachbereich Geowissenschaften, Universita¨t Bremen, PF 330440, 28334 Bremen, Germany 2Institut fu¨r Geowissenschaften, Ruprecht-Karls-Universita¨t Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 234, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany *Corresponding author (e-mail: fl[email protected]) Abstract: Fission-track and (U–Th–Sm)/He thermochronology on apatites are radiometric dating methods that refer to thermal histories of rocks within the temperature range of 408–125 8C. Their introduction into geological research contributed to the development of new concepts to interpreting time-temperature constraints and substantially improved the understanding of cooling processes within the uppermost crust. Present geological applications of apatite thermochronological methods include absolute dating of rocks and tectonic processes, investigation of denudation histories and long-term landscape evolution of various geological settings, and basin analysis. Thermochronology may be described as the the analysis of radiation damage trails (‘fission quantitative study of the thermal histories of rocks tracks’) in uranium-bearing, non-conductive using temperature-sensitive radiometric dating minerals and glasses. It is routinely applied on the methods such as 40Ar/39Ar and K–Ar, fission minerals apatite, zircon and titanite. Fission tracks track, and (U–Th)/He (Berger & York 1981). are produced continuously through geological time Amongst these different methods, apatite fission as a result of the spontaneous fission of 238U track (AFT) and apatite (U–Th–Sm)/He (AHe) atoms. They are submicroscopic features with an are now, perhaps, the most widely used thermo- initial width of approximately 10 nm and a length chronometers as they are the most sensitive to low of up to 20 mm (Paul & Fitzgerald 1992) that can temperatures (typically between 40 and c. -
List of North American Luminescence Labs
North American Laboratories for Luminescence Dating UNITED STATES California Sachiko Sakai Dept. of Anthropology, California State University, Long Beach 1250 Bellflower Blvd. Long Beach, CA 90840 Email: [email protected] - Specializes in archaeological applications. Colorado Shannon Mahan and Harrison Gray U.S.G.S Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, Denver, CO Email: [email protected]; [email protected] https://www.usgs.gov/centers/gecsc/labs/luminescence-dating-laboratory?qt- science_support_page_related_con=4#qt-science_support_page_related_con - Luminescence Dating Laboratory, specializes in geologic and archaeologic applications, and luminescence community leader. Illinois Sébastien Huot Geochronology Laboratory, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, IL Email: [email protected] http://www.isgs.illinois.edu/research/geochemistry/labs/osl - Specializes in feldspar IRSL and quartz OSL dating applications. Indiana Jose Luis Antinao Luminescence Geochronology Laboratory, Indiana Geological and Water Survey Email: [email protected] - Specializes in OSL applications in geomorphology. Updated 03-16-2021 North American Laboratories for Luminescence Dating Kansas Joel Spencer Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas Email: [email protected] - Specialized in geological and archaeological applications. Nebraska Paul Hanson and Richard Kettler University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE Email: [email protected] - Specializes in Nebraska sands, soils and loess and other Mid-West features or geological dating projects linked to -
Lesson Plan Assessment AFL, Activities, Exit Card Cross-Curricular
Relative vs. Absolute Dating Grade 12 – Recording Earth’s Geological History Lesson Plan Assessment AFL, Activities, Exit Card Cross-curricular Big Ideas Specific Expectations • Earth is very old, and its atmosphere, D3. demonstrate an understanding of how changes hydrosphere, and lithosphere have to Earth’s surface have been recorded and undergone many changes over time. preserved throughout geological time and how they contribute to our knowledge of Earth’s history Learning Goals: D3.4 compare and contrast relative and absolute • I understand that geologists rely on two dating principles and techniques as they apply to main types of dating: relative and natural systems (e.g., the law of superposition; the absolute. law of cross-cutting relationships; varve counts; carbon-14 or uranium-lead dating) • I know the 6 Relative Dating Principles. • I can describe how layers of sedimentary rock demonstrate the Principle of Superposition, the Principle of Horizontality, and can demonstrate the Principle of Inclusion. Description In this lesson students will understand that geologists rely on two main types of dating: relative and absolute using some hands on models. This lesson is intended for the university level. Materials Edible Rocks: ½ a Bite Sized Snickers Bar Relative Dating Visuals Definitions Handout Jigsaw Answers and Rubric Relative Dating Lab and Edible Rocks Activity Relative Dating Lab: Sand (different sizes if Discussion Questions Answers available), Gravel (different sizes if available), Safety Notes Shell fragments, Wide-mouth jar with a screw Edible Rocks activity contains nuts. cap Sciencenorth.ca/schools Science North is an agency of the Government of Ontario 1 Introduction Jigsaw Activity – Relative Dating Visuals (See Link) Make groups of 3-5, selecting an expert for the group. -
Closure Temperature of (U-Th)/He System in Apatite Obtained from Natural Drillhole Samples in the Tarim Basin and Its Geological Significance
Article Geology September 2012 Vol.57 No.26: 34823490 doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5176-1 SPECIAL TOPICS: Closure temperature of (U-Th)/He system in apatite obtained from natural drillhole samples in the Tarim basin and its geological significance CHANG Jian1,2 & QIU NanSheng1,2* 1 State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China; 2 Basin and Reservoir Research Center, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China Received February 27, 2012; accepted March 27, 2012; published online May 15, 2012 The apatite (U-Th)/He thermochronometry has been used to study the tectono-thermal evolution of mountains and sedimentary basins for over ten years. The closure temperature of helium is important for the apatite (U-Th)/He thermochronometry and has been widely studied by thermal simulation experiments. In this paper, the apatite He closure temperature was studied by estab- lishing the evolutionary pattern between apatite He ages and apatite burial depth based on examined apatite He ages of natural samples obtained from drillholes in the Tarim basin, China. The study showed that the apatite He closure temperature of natural samples in the Tarim basin is approximately 88±5°C, higher than the result (~75°C) obtained from the thermal simulation exper- iments. The high He closure temperature resulted from high effective uranium concentration, long-term radiation damage accu- mulation, and sufficient particle radii. This study is a reevaluation of the conventional apatite He closure temperature and has a great significance in studying the uplifting events in the late period of the basin-mountain tectonic evolution, of which the uplift- ing time and rates can be determined accurately. -
Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dating Supports Central Arctic Ocean CM-Scale Sedimentation Rates
University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping 2-15-2003 Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dating Supports Central Arctic Ocean CM-scale Sedimentation Rates Martin Jakobsson University of New Hampshire, Durham Jan Backman Stockholm University Andrew Murray University of Aarhus Reidar Lovlie Institute of Solid Earth Physics, Bergen, Norway Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/ccom Part of the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Jakobsson, M., J. Backman, A. Murray, and R. Løvlie (2003), Optically Stimulated Luminescence dating supports central Arctic Ocean cm-scale sedimentation rates, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 4, 1016, doi:10.1029/2002GC000423, 2. This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Article Geochemistry 3 Volume 4, Number 2 Geophysics 15 February 2003 1016, doi:10.1029/2002GC000423 GeosystemsG G ISSN: 1525-2027 AN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF THE EARTH SCIENCES Published by AGU and the Geochemical Society Optically Stimulated Luminescence dating supports central Arctic Ocean cm-scale sedimentation rates Martin Jakobsson Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping/Joint Hydrographic Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA Jan Backman Department of Geology and Geochemistry, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Andrew Murray The Nordic Laboratory for Luminescence Dating, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Aarhus, Risø National Laboratory, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark Reidar Løvlie Institute of Solid Earth Physics, Alle´gt. -
Abstract Luminescence Dating of Ceramics From
ABSTRACT LUMINESCENCE DATING OF CERAMICS FROM ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IN THE SODA LAKE REGION OF THE MOJAVE DESERT By Andrea C. Bardsley August 2009 Ceramic studies in the Mojave Desert of California have long been plagued with vague and imprecise chronological data and have relied heavily on relative dating methods in discussing the antiquity of ceramics from this region. Luminescence dating offers an excellent means of generating a ceramic chronology directly from the ceramic samples found in the archaeological record. Soda Lake has a long and well established history of human occupation and is an excellent location to study the earliest forms of pottery in the Mojave Desert. This study successfully uses Optically Stimulated Luminescence dating techniques to date the manufacture event of each ceramic sherd and generate an approximate age for the occupation of sites along the Soda Lake playa. LUMINESCENCE DATING OF CERAMICS FROM ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IN THE SODA LAKE REGION OF THE MOJAVE DESERT A THESIS Presented to the Department of Anthropology California State University, Long Beach In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Anthropology Committee Members: Carl P. Lipo, Ph.D. (Chair) Hector Neff, Ph.D. Daniel O. Larson, Ph.D. College Designee: Mark Wiley, Ph.D. By Andrea C. Bardsley B.A., 2006, University of California, Santa Barbara August 2009 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE, HAVE APPROVED THIS THESIS LUMINESCENCE DATING OF CERAMICS FROM ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IN THE SODA LAKE REGION OF THE MOJAVE DESERT By Andrea Bardsley COMMITTEE MEMBERS _____________________________________________________________________ Carl P. Lipo, Ph.D. (Chair) Anthropology _____________________________________________________________________ Hector Neff, Ph.D. -
Development of a Multi-Method Chronology Spanning the Last Glacial Interval from Orakei Maar Lake, Auckland, New Zealand” by Leonie Peti Et Al
Geochronology Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2020-23-RC2, 2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Interactive comment on “Development of a multi-method chronology spanning the Last Glacial Interval from Orakei maar lake, Auckland, New Zealand” by Leonie Peti et al. Anonymous Referee #2 Received and published: 9 September 2020 Review for Peti et al. Development of a multi-method chronology spanning the Last Glacial Interval from Orakei maar lake, Auckland, New Zealand In review at Geochronology Discussions Peti and colleagues present a multi-proxy age model for an exceptional sedimentary sequence spanning the last glacial cycle from the Auckland Volcanic Field. To develop the ago model, they integrate radiocarbon, tephra stratigraphy, luminescence dating, paleomagnetism, and cosmogenic Be. To treat their data objectively and to quan- tify uncertainty, they employ Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) and Bayesian Age Depth C1 modeling methods. Overall, the paper is well written, and the data are clearly pre- sented. I was interested in reading more about the archive and the author’s approach and perspectives on building their multi-proxy age model. Studies like this are essential for all of us that work on sedimentary sequences and the chronology will likely form the backbone for many future studies that will work on the Orakei (and other regional) maar lake. I feel this study is certainly suitable for publication in Geochronology with some revision. I am not an expert in the luminescence dating methods, and while they seem properly documented and presented in a way I can follow, hopefully another reviewer can evaluate them in more detail. -
4. Thermochronology – Techniques and Methods
4. Thermochronology – Techniques and Methods 4.1 Introduction to thermochronology Thermochronology is the study of dating the cooling of rocks through exhumation. In its simplest form, thermochronology can be considered to date the moment when a mineral passes through a specific closure temperature (Tc) (Dodson, 1973). Minerals have different closure temperatures and so by using a suite of thermochronometers on a single sample, its cooling path through the crust can be reconstructed. The minerals and closure temperatures available for use are illustrated in figure 4.1. The highest temperature chronometers have closure temperatures in excess of 750oC (U-Pb in zircon). These higher temperature chronometers such as the U-Pb system in zircon are used to date, for example, Archean gneiss terrains, due to the unlikely nature of them having been reset, with depths required for reset at ~30 km (assuming a 25oCkm-1 geothermal gradient). This study focuses on the low temperature thermochronometers which may allow the geomorphic signature of the landscape to become etched into the thermochronometric record. Two principal low temperature thermochronometers are used in this study, apatite fission track analysis (AFT) and apatite (U-Th)/He analysis (AHe). These are the lowest temperature chronometers that are known about in sufficient detail and calibrated well enough to make them usable. The low temperature thermochronometers may be used in a variety of ways, but one of their principal uses and that used in this study is to determine the temperature-time history of samples. As an extension to this they may also be used to determine exhumation rates by making some assumptions and for the higher temperature chronometers, to date the timing of formation of the rock/mineral in question.