Development Management Committee

DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE

Report by Development Management Manager

1 DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

Application for the approval of Matters Specified in Conditions of planning permission 1012/P/05 for a revision to the approved Winchburgh Master Plan for a variation of the Block J boundary, at Block J, Winchburgh.

2 DETAILS

Reference no. 0287/MSC/15 Owner of Winchburgh Developments Limited site Applicant Winchburgh Ward & local Broxburn, Uphall & Winchburgh Developments Limited members T. Boyle D. Calder J. Campbell A. Davidson Case officer Wendy McCorriston Contact Tel: 01506 282406 details Email: [email protected]

Reason for referral to Development Management Committee: Application continued for two cycles from committee of 12 August 2015 for the provision of additional information and for members to visit the site.

3 RECOMMENDATION

Approve the application for matters specified in conditions, subject to conditions.

4 BACKGROUND

4.1 At the Development Management Committee meeting of 12th August 2015 members agreed to continue this application for two cycles to allow the committee members to participate in a second site visit and to allow officers time to prepare a power point presentation, which was to include plans, so members could get a better understanding of all the technical aspects of the application.

4.2 A copy of the report to the August committee meeting accompanies this report.

5 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

5.1 The applicant has arranged for pegging out on the site and supplied a plan so that members can see the route of the original approved distributor road; the proposed route for a construction access and the position of the closest proposed houses in Block J2.

5.2 The applicant has supplied technical plans showing the gradients and height of road that would be required to safely cross the existing gas pipeline. These plans will be available in the power point presentation at the committee meeting. These show that a road would not meet technical standards coming off the junction with the B9080, as a road gradient of 10.5% would be required. The maximum permitted gradient to meet council standards is 8%, though the optimum maximum is 5%. However, regardless of whether technical standards can be met or not, the road is not required in terms of the overall road network and vehicle capacity requirements to facilitate the development of all the housing blocks in this part of the master plan.

5.3 The applicant has also supplied an additional statement in support of the application. This repeats much of the information in the original committee report (attached) so has not been included with this paper, but is available for members to view in the online casefile. Some points of clarification have been made in that statement and these are set out below.

5.4 The statement indicates that the approved road corridor could be up to 19m wide, rather than 14 to 16m wide as set out in the original report, as it would include highway verges and footpaths on either side. This is a matter for the detailed design process, so the information in the original report is appropriate for assessment of what is an amendment to the permission in principle only.

5.5 The statement also clarifies, as noted in the original committee report, that the two existing access points into Block K give a greater road network capacity, safely allowing for both the Stewart Milne development and the proposed 51 units in Blocks J1 and J2 to be accommodated within the local road network through Block K. It confirms that the proposed access to the south of Block K crossing the Glendevon Burn would be for emergency vehicle access only. As such, the maximum number of dwellings able to use the Block K B9080 access junctions as part of the proposals in the vicinity of Blocks K, J (as amended) and the Steading would not exceed 280 dwellings as set out in the agreed 2012 Block K Transport Statement.

5.6 The statement confirms again that the applicant is willing to construct a separate construction access to Block J to prevent construction traffic going through Block K and that the subsequent detailed applications for Block J will include enhanced areas of formal open space.

6 REPRESENTATIONS

6.1 Following the committee meeting in August, the applicant invited residents to walk over the site and view the pegging out of the original approved distributor road; the proposed route for a construction access and the position of the closest proposed houses in Block J2. Two of the objectors have subsequently withdrawn their objections (one of which has now moved from Winchburgh).

7 ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATION

7.1 Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 requires planning applications to be determined in accordance with the development plan, unless material considerations indicate otherwise.

7.2 The principle of residential development on this site is supported by the policies and provisions of the development plan. The concerns of the local residents have been taken into account in the submitted Design Statement, which illustrates that the small increase in housing by 24 units in total (17 in J2) can facilitate the formation of better planned and useable open space which will benefit the wider community, whilst protecting the open outlook and visual amenity of the area. The removal of the distributor road corridor will bring significant environmental improvements for the area.

7.3 It is recommended that this MSC application is approved, subject to the conditions attached to the August 2015 report, which require that the design and landscape principles of the Block J Design Statement to be adhered to at the subsequent detailed application stage and that the necessary technical reports be submitted at that time.

8 POWER POINT PLANS

• Approved master plan showing Block J • Approved road and proposed Blocks J1 and J2 • Site visit pegging out plan • Road gradient and section plan • Construction access plan

CHRIS NORMAN Development Management Manager Date: 21 October 2015

DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE

Report by Development Management Manager

1 DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

2 DETAILS

Reason for referral to Development Management Committee: Over 14 objections.

3 RECOMMENDATION

Approve the application for matters specified in conditions, subject to conditions

4 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL AND PLANNING HISTORY

4.1 This application is for an amendment to the boundaries of one of the development blocks (Block J), which is identified in the Winchburgh Master Plan, 2009, for the development of in the region of 27 houses, and the removal of a section of the proposed distributor road (which will link Winchburgh to Broxburn). The Master Plan was approved in April 2012 as part of the Permission in Principle for the expansion of Winchburgh (ref: 1012/P/05).

4.2 The site currently comprises agricultural land; a 22m wide fenced corridor through which a high pressure gas pipeline runs and a small area of mown grass and verge adjacent to the B9080 Winchburgh Main Street. There are new Barratt and Miller houses to the northwest in Church View (Block K); a woodland belt and older housing to the east in Tippet Knowes Road and the Glendevon Burn corridor to the south.

4.3 The proposal is to remove what would have been a 14m to 16m wide road corridor; expand the original approved Block J boundary by 0.5 Ha (shown as Block J1) and add in Block J2 (0.95 Ha). The vehicular access to these blocks is proposed from the existing

road end in the southeast corner of Block K. This road would have provided access onto the distributor road as part of the original master plan proposals. Following a residents meeting and a public exhibition, which neighbouring residents were invited to attend, a Block J Design Statement has been submitted with the application. This includes an indicative housing layout showing 51 houses in total, comprising 34 houses in Block J1 and 17 in Block J2.

4.4 The site is within the settlement boundary of Winchburgh and part of the allocated Core Development Area (CDA) in the adopted West Lothian Local Plan. It is shown as Development Block J and part of the strategic landscape and distributor road corridor in the approved master plan.

5 PLANNING POLICY ASSESSMENT Plan Policy Assessment Conform Southeast Policy 6 Each planning authority in the SESplan area is required to Scotland (Housing land maintain a five year effective housing land supply at all Yes Strategic flexibility) times. The scale of this supply is to be derived from the Development housing requirements for each Local Development Plan Plan area and identified through supplementary guidance. (SESplan) The application site forms part of the allocated CDA in the adopted local plan, where there is a general presumption in favour of residential development.

Approval of the amended boundaries would in effect be granting permission in principle for housing development on this site and detailed infrastructure and layout applications would still be required. Approval would, however, allow for additional flexibility in the supply of housing land within this SESplan area. SESplan Policy 9 The Strategic Development Plan identifies, through its (Infrastructure) Action Programme, infrastructure which is required to Yes deliver the development of the Strategy. Local Development Plans are required to: a. Safeguard land to accommodate the necessary infrastructure to deliver the Strategic Development Plan; b. Provide policy guidance that will require sufficient infrastructure to be available, or its provision to be committed, before development can proceed; and c. Pursue the delivery of infrastructure through developer contributions, funding from infrastructure providers or other appropriate means.

The key infrastructure constraint in Winchburgh is non- denominational secondary school capacity and to some extent primary school capacity. The site is within the Linlithgow Academy catchment area. There is a condition in place on the overall master plan permission (1012/P/05) that no more than 550 residential units (other than exempt units such as 1 bedroom units) shall be occupied until measures are put in place to ensure there is adequate capacity. There is a similar condition for primary school capacity.

Council officers and the main developer are currently in negotiation in respect of delivering the new school provision but, until such time that the details are finalised, this condition will also apply to any expanded areas within the approved master plan West Lothian HOU2 Within settlement envelopes this policy establishes a Local Plan (General guidance general presumption in favour of new development Yes (WLLP) for housing provided there is no adverse impact on adjacent uses and development within sites can be serviced without excessive resource settlement commitment. Development will be resisted where it will boundaries) exacerbate problems of infrastructure or traffic congestion.

The site lies within the settlement boundary for Winchburgh.The principle of development of the site with 27 units has already been established through the approved master plan. The increase of 7 units up to 34 units in J1 is within acceptable limits for compliance with the requirements in the original permission in principle. The main consideration is therefore the introduction of the 17 units in the proposed Block J2 in lieu of the removal of the distributor road and associated landscape. This matter is examined in more detail in Section 8, Assessment, below.

Transportation is satisfied that the proposed vehicular access from the existing road end in the Block K Barratt development is acceptable. A further emergency access would be proposed to the south, across the burn, once other development blocks (G, H and I) come forward. Transportation is satisfied with this approach.

Subject to compliance with the conditions on the main consent, the site can be serviced without excessive resource commitment from the council. WLLP COM2 This policy stipulates that proposals which will result in the (Open space) loss of urban sports and recreation facilities, or formal and Yes informal open space, will be resisted. Proposals to develop or change the use of open space should be assessed in terms of the following criteria: a) a locational justification for the development; b) the importance of the open space for recreation or amenity; c) disturbance and loss of trees, woodlands and wildlife habitats or green corridors; and d) the availability and accessibility of alternative suitable open space, including the suitability of any replacement provision proposed by a developer.

The application site is not a sports facility nor a formal area of open space identified in the local plan. Nevertheless, in the approved master plan this site includes an area of amenity landscape between the new cycle path that is in place and the distributor road. The loss of that amenity landscaping therefore requires to be assessed in terms of the criteria above.

With the removal of the distributor road corridor (as set out and justified under policy HOU8 below) the key issue is whether the addition of Block J2 in its place can be justified. The master plan shows Block K as providing 230 houses. Only 182 were actually consented within that Block and are occupied or under construction. The additional 24 units proposed with this application will therefore replace some of the unit numbers lost through building to a lower density in Block K.

The area in question is former farm land. Once developed on either side it will not be viable for agricultural use on its own. It would remain as a grass embankment. The master plan already sets out the locations proposed for formal neighbourhood and district parks. The nearest to this site is to the southwest, near Glendevon Farm House. The application site will therefore not be formal useable open space. The proposed housing will facilitate its regrading to allow for more useable areas of open space to be formed, which will have greater recreational and visual amenity value. The use for both housing and useable open space represents a sustainable use of urban land rather than leaving it as a large expanse of open space, which could potentially be a maintenance burden for surrounding residents.

There is a sound locational justification which will allow for the increase of the housing numbers back to the original planned level and facilitate the formation of open space of a greater recreational and visual amenity value. No trees will be affected by the development and a significant green corridor of between 37m to over 50m wide will be retained. WLLP HOU7 This policy requires developers to incorporate the highest (Design and layout) quality of design and layout within new housing Yes developments, having regard to energy efficiency principles in proposing layouts, housing designs and use of materials, and should conform to the guidance provided in the Residential Development Guide (WLC) and the design principles set out in the policy.

The submitted Design Statement illustrates that the site layout can be designed taking into account the above policy provisions. A series of key design and landscape principles that should be applied to any detailed layout are set out. Whilst there is an increase in the number of houses, the statement shows that the developable area of Block J2 can be reduced at either end to form level and more useable open space areas than would have been available as part of the road corridor landscape.

The initial submission indicated that an additional 30 houses were proposed over the approved 27. As amended through the Design Statement this has been reduced to 24, with the key change being the introduction of 17 in Block J2.

Subject to ensuring that the principles set out in the Design Statement are adhered to in any subsequent detailed application, which can be achieved through the imposition of appropriate conditions, a high quality housing layout can be achieved in this location. WLLP HOU8 To comply with this policy, new housing developments must (Access and be designed and laid out to help reduce vehicle speeds on Yes parking) local residential streets to 20 mph and include safe and direct footpath and cycle path routes to the existing footpath network.

The applicant’s engineers have advised that the provision of the original distributor road, where it joins the B9080 at the northern part of the site is not technically feasible as it would require a large bridge structure over the gas pipeline and the necessary road levels cannot be achieved. This technical detail had not been fully worked out at the time of the master plan approval. In terms of traffic generation the original master plan envisaged 230 units coming off one access into Block K. As approved and being built out there are only 182 units and there are two access points off the B9080. There are 38 units in the Stewart Milne development accessed through Block K. Transportation is satisfied that both the approved 182 units in Block K and the 51 now proposed in Blocks J1 and J2 can be readily accommodated off the existing road network. Transportation is also satisfied that the remaining blocks to the south (G, H and I) can be accessed through a local road network rather than a distributor standard road. The proposed north-south distributor road, located west of the Glendevon track, will remain.

Once the Block K developments are completed there will be traffic calming measures installed throughout the site. These can be continued through to Blocks J1 and J2 and will be submitted at the detailed layout stage.

Pedestrian and cycle connections have been shown in the Design Statement through and around the site and the final layout will require to be developed in accordance with Designing Streets policy provisions. Transportation is satisfied that these details can be made conditions of any consent. WLLP HOU9 The proposals set out in the Design Statement shown that (Residential and the existing woodland belt to the east of the site will be Yes visual amenity) retained and enhanced as part of the proposals. The development will not be detrimental to the residential or visual amenity of existing residents to the east in Tippet Knowes Road.

The removal of the distributor road and inclusion of more useable areas of open space in Block J2 will result in significant improvement of the planned level of residential and visual amenity for existing residents to the north and south ends of Church View. There will be some increase in traffic for the flats and two houses adjacent to the access

road but this would be similar to any through road onto the proposed distributor road. There will be a change in the planned outlook for some residents in Church View, however, there is no right to a view and an open space corridor of at least 37m will be retained. Window to window distances will be in excess of 50m, so privacy and overshadowing standards (18m minimum distance) will be met. There will be no detrimental impacts from the development on neighbouring properties and the character of the overall location is respected through the set back of the houses from the open space corridor. WLLP IMP2 All developers of housing sites will be required to (Denominational contribute to the cost of providing additional education Yes secondary school) infrastructure in West Lothian for the denominational secondary sector. Housing developments which will exacerbate capacity problems at existing denominational secondary schools will be resisted.

Developer contributions towards the denominational secondary school sector have been agreed to by the applicant as part of the overall permission in principle and are being collected through the terms of the existing legal agreement. WLLP IMP3 Where appropriate in considering proposals for housing (Education development, planning conditions and/or legal agreements Yes constraints) will be required to: a) secure the provision of new schools or extensions, and associated community facilities, from developers where this is directly attributable to serving their proposed housing development; and/or b) phase development, to manage demand on school places. The approach to assessing education implications of proposed housing are set out in specific SPG. Where education constraints cannot be overcome there will be a presumption against housing development. As set out above, in relation to SESplan policy 9 (Infrastructure), the applicant has already entered into a legal agreement to pay the required developer contributions and provide the necessary infrastructure at trigger points throughout the development. The triggers will be automatically extended to this area of land through the terms of the overall permission in principle and the existing legal agreement.

Other material considerations are: Scottish Planning Policy (SPP); PAN 83 Masterplanning WLC Supplementary Planning Guidance: Planning for Education; Developer Contributions and Residential Development Guide.

6 REPRESENTATIONS

6.1. Fifty one letters of material objection and comment have been received from local residents including those in Tippet Knowes Road, Church View and Church Place (Block K); the Glendevon Farm Road Residents Association, prospective house purchasers and

members of Winchburgh Community Council . A petition of 38 signatures against the application, the majority of whom have also objected individually, was also collected at a residents meeting about the application. The material issues are set out below. The full letters are attached to this report.

Representation Response Loss of green space, which should be used to As set out in Section 5 above, under COM2, the area develop useable open space where children can was not designated as formal open space in the play and people can walk and meet. master plan but rather amenity landscaping along the proposed road corridor. The master plan is not an The site is a public park in the development plan adopted master plan, but was approved by the which has been adopted by Scottish Ministers and Development Management Committee as part of the the proposal is contrary to the objectives of the permission in principle for the expansion of Scottish Government for the creation of healthier, Winchburgh. In the adopted local plan (which has greener, safer and stronger communities. been approved by Scottish Ministers) the whole area is identified for development as part of the Winchburgh Core Development Area.

The area proposed for development is not used in any formal way for recreational use, however, the existing cycle track and the area around the SUDS pond is well used by walkers. The Design Statement shows that the land proposed for housing in Block J2 can be reduced and useable areas of open space can be formed to enhance the planned formal provision for the area. A series of path links is also shown which can improve the walking, running and cycling routes in the area. These design principles can be made conditions of any future detailed proposals for the site. In this way the development will represent the best sustainable use of urban land and will facilitate the creation of more useable areas of open space and accessible housing developments. Additional traffic will now require access through The master plan identified Block K as suitable for 230 the new housing areas, to the detriment of road houses, using a single access from the B9080, with a and pedestrian safety. Traffic calming is required. further access through to 27 houses in Block J. Only 182 are approved in Block K and there are two access points from the B9080. The two access points give a greater road network capacity, safely allowing for both the Stewart Milne development and the proposed 51 units in Blocks J1 and J2 to be accommodated. Traffic calming will be installed throughout Block K and will carry through to Block J as part of any detailed application. The proposal will result in construction traffic The applicant has agreed that whilst an adopted coming through Block K with implications for child standard road cannot be built directly off the B9080 safety and damage to the road surface and house and over the pipeline, a construction access can be foundations. accommodated so that construction traffic does not require to go through Block K. This can be made a condition of any consent. There are safety issues of taking the new access The developer’s engineers liaise closely with over the gas pipeline and there will be increased Scotland Gas Networks (SGN) and the master plan traffic fumes for residents. shows that there are several points where the pipeline requires to be crossed. A pipeline safety

report was submitted as part of the original master plan and the working practices were agreed by SGN. This proposal will remove a distributor standard road which would have had greater potential for traffic fumes and road noise. With appropriate traffic calming through Block K, the current proposal offers a more localised and sustainable solution to accessing Block J. The site could potentially have unsafe deep mine As part of the submissions with the Winchburgh works and be unsuitable for housing development Master Plan an Environmental Statement was and also impact on the foundations of existing undertaken which included an assessment of the properties. risks from historic coal and shale mining. The areas for development were set out following this assessment. The original Block J, as with a number of the sites in the master plan, is partly within a Coal Authority high risk area. A detailed Coal Risk Assessment will need to be undertaken as part of any subsequent detailed planning application and this will determine whether mitigation works are required in terms of the ground conditions. The expanded J2 area is not within a high risk area. Any mitigation works that are required will need to be agreed with the Coal Authority and will need to ensure that there is no adverse impact on neighbouring properties. The area around the burn corridor is susceptible to The original Environmental Statement assessed flooding and may not be suitable for housing. potential flood risks and developed a drainage strategy in conjunction with SEPA and council Flood Management officers. The area adjacent to the burn is not part of the area proposed for housing development. SEPA and the council’s Flood Management team have raised no objections to the application, subject to the final layout tying into the overall approved drainage strategy and meeting standard SUDS requirements. Glendevon Farm Road Residents Association is The current proposal means that there will no longer concerned that this application does not consider be a distributor road crossing the track, which is the the future access proposals for the development position in the approved master plan. Instead there blocks G, H and I. An overall solution should be will be a local road crossing and that crossing will not found which avoids the need to cross the be a through road, but only access to Block H and Glendevon track with a new access road. Block I. There will only be emergency access to Block J and this will not be required for at least 4 or 5 years when the main north-south distributor road is constructed. At that time it may also be possible that other access solutions can be examined that will provide a better solution.

7 CONSULTATIONS

7.1 This is a summary of the consultations; the full documents are contained in the application file. Consultee Objection? Comments Planning Response WLC Transportation No No objections to the application. Noted.

WLC Education No No objections, subject to Noted. The site will be

developer contributions being covered by the existing paid, as per the existing legal legal agreement. agreement. WLC Contaminated No No objections, subject to site Noted. Conditions can be Land investigation, risk assessment imposed to require full and remediation, if required, details at the detailed being undertaken as part of the planning stage. detailed application stage, in line with the previous contaminated land reports for the Winchburgh Master Plan area WLC Flood No No comments on the Noted. Management application. SEPA No No objections, subject to a Noted. Conditions can be condition requiring that the imposed to require full surface water discharge is in details at the detailed accordance with the principles planning stage. of SUDS and the standard requirements of SEPA and Scottish Water, for obtaining the necessary connections, are met. Health and Safety No Does not advise, on safety Noted. Executive grounds, against granting permission. West of Scotland No No objections, subject to the Noted. An investigation Archaeology Service ongoing requirements for will be required to be (WoSAS) archaeological investigations, as undertaken as part of the part of the subsequent detailed reports for the detailed application phase, being application stage. adhered to.

8 ASSESSMENT

8.1 Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 requires planning applications to be determined in accordance with the development plan, unless material considerations indicate otherwise.

Development Plan

South East Scotland Strategic Development Plan and West Lothian Local Plan

8.2 The application has been assessed in terms of the development plan policies set out in Section 5 above and the comments and concerns raised by local residents.

8.3 Within the settlement envelope there is a general presumption in favour of new development, provided there is no adverse impact on adjacent uses and development will not exacerbate problems of infrastructure or traffic congestion. The principle of development of this site has already been established through the approved Winchburgh Master Plan which indicates Block J can accommodate in the region of 27 houses. The intention of a master plan, as set out in Planning Advice Note (PAN) 83 Masterplanning, is to guide the form of development rather than set out stringent requirements. Since its approval in 2012, approvals for over 500 houses and a retail development have all been

granted in accordance with the terms of the Winchburgh Master Plan. This is the first amendment of any scale and is essentially for the development of 24 additional houses (17 of which are in area J2) in place of a distributor road corridor.

8.4 The key issues are therefore whether the loss of the open space to accommodate these houses and the amended access proposals are acceptable. The increase in house numbers goes some way to make up the 48 units lost in Block K (which should have been developed for 230 units) but, because the sites are of a lower density than anticipated, there is a resultant loss of amenity open space. The applicant has advised that the removal of the road corridor does in fact leave a slightly greater area (894 sqm) of open space in this location than shown in the original master plan but in a more linear form.

8.5 As set out in Sections 5 and 6 above, the submitted Design Statement illustrates that the site layout can be designed such that the developable area of Block J2 is reduced at either end to form level and more useable open space areas than would have been available as part of the original road corridor landscape.

8.6 The proposed housing will facilitate the re-grading of the land to allow for more useable areas of open space to be formed, which will have greater recreational and visual amenity value. The use for both housing and useable open space represents a sustainable use of urban land.

8.7 The applicant has agreed to form a separate construction access directly off the B9080, in order to address the concerns of residents regarding construction access through the existing Block K housing. Transportation has confirmed that there is adequate capacity in the existing road network to safely accommodate the traffic from the expanded Block J. The requirement for traffic calming measures will be assessed more fully at the detailed application stage.

8.8 The amended access proposals, which will reduce the road network to a local road system, will remove the need for a distributor grade through road to cross the Glendevon track. This will improve the prospective level of residential and environmental amenity for those surrounding residents.

9 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

9.1 The principle of residential development on this site is supported by the policies and provisions of the development plan. The concerns of the local residents have been taken into account in the submitted Design Statement, which illustrates that the small increase in housing by 24 units in total (17 in J2) can facilitate the formation of better planned and useable open space which will benefit the wider community, whilst protecting the open outlook and visual amenity of the area. The removal of the distributor road corridor will bring significant environmental improvements for the area.

9.2 It is recommended that planning permission be granted, subject to conditions to ensure that the design and landscape principles of the Block J Design Statement are adhered to at the subsequent detailed application stage and the necessary technical reports are submitted at that time.

10 ATTACHMENTS

• Draft conditions • Location plan • Aerial plan • Approved master plan • Approved road and Block J • Proposed indicative layout plan • Representations

CHRIS NORMAN Development Management Manager Date: 12 August 2015

DRAFT CONDITIONS - APPLICATION 0287/MSC/15

1 The development hereby approved is granted as a material variation to the Final Master Plan, in terms of condition 1 of Planning Permission in Principle ref : 1012/P/05. In line with that permission all subsequent development of the site shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the approved amended master plan and all the extant conditions of Planning Permission in Principle ref : 1012/P/05.

Reason To ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved master plan and other submitted details.

2 The development of the site shall be carried out in accordance with the principles and provisions set out in the submitted Block J Design Statement, dated 6 July 2015. In particular the development shall take into account the design and landscape principles and shall include the provision of two amenity grass areas to provide for informal recreation and seating. Path links shall also be provided to connect into the existing and planned footpath and cycle network.

Reason In order to create a high quality landscaped setting for the development and provide useable open space for existing and new residents.

3 The following restrictions shall be adhered to during the construction of development on the site: Construction Traffic The construction traffic associated with the development of the expanded Block J sites shall be accessed using a separate access directly off the B9080 and shall not be routed through the existing housing areas. Full details of the construction access shall be submitted with the MSC infrastruction application for this site.

Construction vehicles shall not arrive or leave the site except between the hours of 0800 and 1800 Monday to Friday and 0900 and 1300 on Saturdays. No heavy goods vehicles shall arrive or leave the site on Sundays. Hours of Operation Construction works which cause noise that is audible in any noise sensitive premises beyond the boundary of the site shall take place between the hours of 0800 and 1800 Monday – Friday and 0900 and 1300 on Saturdays only. No work that is audible in any noise sensitive premises beyond the site boundary shall occur on a Sunday. Wheel Cleaning

All construction vehicles leaving the site shall do so in a manner that does not cause the deposition of mud or other deleterious material on the adjacent public highway. Such steps shall include the cleaning of the wheels and undercarriage of each vehicle where necessary and the provision of road sweeping equipment. Site Compound The location and dimensions of any site compound shall be agreed in writing with the planning authority prior to works commencing. All material not required for the construction of any building shall be immediately stored within this compound within sealed skips prior to its removal from site.

Soil Dumps The location and height of soil dumps shall be agreed in writing with the planning authority prior to works commencing.

Reason In the interests of visual and environmental amenity and in order to protect the residential amenity of neighbours. 88.3m

86.9m MP

B 9080

86.1m

82.2m

Lay by

23 2

21 19 22 20

18 17

TIPPE T KNO WES C

OURT

6 1

o t

1 9

0 1 5

1 Track 1

Glendevon 1

1 3

3 6

1 9

3 5 21 Hopper

5 3 3

3 2

4 5 62 185 60

187

6 1 8

Glendevon 7 3

4 6 2

8 6 7

4 A

Grieves 5 7 S

Cottage W

84 3 N 8

K 1 86 76

8 8

E 7

78 5 5

P 9

P I

7 9

1 9

2 4

6 6 9 5

7 5

5 1

9 7 67 6 9 71

1 9

9 1 9 4 5

1 5 1 5

El 1

0 1

5 1 0

3 Sub

Sta

1 1 9

2 0

1 7 1

0 9

0 1 1

1 3

1 1 1

1 Playground

6 1

1 1

1 1 1 7 2 9

1 1 1 3 5 1

o t

3 3

5 5

o t

7 5

0287/MSC/15

— Fw: of Address: To: Case SubjectObjectlon Commenter Address: Comments: Customer ApplicatiOn From Proposal: 9. 2. We email: Date: front Stance: 8. Name: 6. where Reasons shops, 7. 4. 10, 5. 1. 3. passing after and 11. As Object This A The There blodci Damage May Housing pIann1ng’westlothiaa.gov.uk; Unknown object What forced making Ongmal Officer: a development gate. Mon, Objection gas children leisure is new Mr affect Customer front for are Block a 2 to bounder other Approval details: for pipe and Church residential takes to access Summary 25 home comments: further this Type: already Wendy message—— door. market the risks the will May J, Mrs has can planning an wincliburgh less road following strongly owner not to point Neighbour View to are of k i always access 2015 play years a Mccorrlston Fallens is planning time value current matters area be number great ( well which grid Wincflburgh has arid to is we in 13:49 of to road objects been where in or underway place ion: already ref construction people were develop house is store p’an marketing specified consent through not 30B098 present before children unaware to that designed can taken foundations of the than fling and of houses in we would walk 749l1) and of more planning 0287/MSCJ1S access conditions place are people Infrastructure house. are of therefore for and the out consent people being increase not when going heavy possible admire are future playing application aware built. of In move the past why duty planning traffic situe. and plans the future of. on odlayout road We our propose traffic. in. bikes, beautiful the of and should to front subsidence 1012/P/OS overall develop ultimately scooters a door use was road surroundings. development the area especially changed. in due for etc place the land .1 revised which to first to these heavy

0 as develop instance of should we rnasterptan winchburgh children duty have be a construction and

tI6tt Mon better young actively at to then greater Including 25 reflect green hiidren change encouraged l4ay traffic risk. space variation schools, and plans 16:19 - no Sent To: Subject Dunn, From:

Thanks DATA

To:

Sent: Please Subject:

From:

Proposal:

reflect

Case

Customer Address E-mail: Name

Good that

We I remain plan

would

Planning

would

•

• •

the

Officer: is

morning, LABEL:

corn

: variation

Sutherland,

Wendy

already

Maureen

Scott

the

The when

environment no add this made

housing BuildIng will were

Building small Living land so :45

May

Block)

details:

Approval

doubt

much case,

area, to

plan, not

Church by

Sutherland

Wendy

2015

INTERNAL told

completed,

land

strongly in

directly

being

that

front

preserve

is - on other

houses

and

of make

also

which

Winchburgh

Scott this Block

the

based

11:10

the

every

the

View,

proposed

Mccorriston

this of

and not

understand

matters

Invested

was), across last

areas,

object

the

pollution the

habitat

(Risk

has

was

suitable the ONLY

animals

boundary

scan/redact

available this

Winchburgh.

thing

following

this

property

this

and

from creating

character

Infrastructure)

to backed

specified

(1012/P/05)

land

dangerous

this

the

land will

McCorriston, FW: PEDSupportServices

change,

expensive it,

for

such

this

green

lorries (grid

May

is above

birds

area contradicts

continue

objections: (block

Block

families

should

area,

creatures,

EH52 ‘concrete

when 2015

use

ref.

space,

needs.

and of

the

conditions

constantly

proposal. -

and

J),

new -

prey.

I remain Objection

Plot 308098

GSZ

can to

Wendy Winchburgh

historic to feel 12:28

would

thoughtless.

the

live will

transform

homes

jungle’. K

tell to

were

think

governments

in. destroy

ruin

674911)

remain

of We

you

passing

town

check

thoroughfare

shown

planning

the

recently

this

that

There have

the -

this ‘green

Objection There

aesthetics

the false

through

has

Winchburgh.

the

village,

been

for

unrestricted permission

policy bought

premise.

currently a

plans.

are

space’.

already

reasons

misled.

for

amending

0287/MSC/15

taken of

residentIal

number

building

the

We house

protection

a Children

1012/P/05

into

home are sprawl

large

‘village’,

profit

were

the

traffic

incredibly

account

area

number

young

for

Church

of specifically will

plan -

would

[INTERNAL

and

built

for and

green

range

?2’&T

families

when

well

revised

you View be disappointed

put

squeeze

houses

as belt

areas,

have

advised

travesty.

already

ONLY]

4e’T7tr*e the

wildlife,

unnecessary

masterplan

land

the

this

29/OS/IS

planned

new

building

mistakes

this

premise

(which destroying

area, that

from

houses

would

this

for

here who

Ct>1j

risk,

we On

Scott

The Regards,

the

Square, This Authorised message other this recipient does Whilst Scotland not give West http://webwest1.o,p. CLASSIFIED;

PROTECT: Link PUBLIC: INTERNAL

i.)

SAVE

• •

Prudential

adversely

regard

slightly Royal

your e-mail M.

not

than

Lothlan

Information

This

At We again, change site, detriment location sufficiently. subsequent We enraged closed,

All

all

Edinburgh Sutherland

PRIVATE/CONFIDENTIAL accept from

PAPER

ONLY:

plc

the

information

consent

reasonable

the were

were

Contains

Bank

area

and followed

separate

message ensure

may we

Town

affect

addressee, by

Regulation Council

your

the

Contains

makes

the

responsibility never is

also - never

apologies

of large

Handling

Please also

monitor

to Prudential

town

information neighbour.

west!othion.gov.

Hall that recipient EH2

the

Scotland

computer.

by note

its

Informed

has

our

care

informed

used number

received -

information

housing

health

meeting

confidential easily

systems

the

hall been

Data

2YB

monitoring

please

Procedure:

Authority. would

c-mails has

not

for

onward

earlier

this

approved should

plc,

accessIble

that Regulation that

and

Labels:

for

dog-walkers,

been

Internet -

would

any

Contains

is or

return

also

residents,

tik]jtsJpoIicies/itsecurity/WLC%2Olnformation%2OHondIinp%2Qprocedure.pdf

Registered

this

wellbeing for

attended

changes

late.

the this

for

correspondence

data.

subject

this

transmission,

taken

carry and

council

of like

remove had

for

proposal,

business

11th

week.

the

e-mail e-mails

for

your

Personal

for public

Authority

until

to out

new existing

message

made

children

May, staff

highlight

responsibility use

11MG

‘town avoid in

this

unless

such the

disclosure this

there

and

are

and Scotland only

benefit

Classifications

community.

opening

Business

Friday

residents

hail’

post

not

existing. the virus the communications and

absoLutely

this

were and

operational

the

was

the

necessarily

transmission

addressee

meeting

adults this

following:

message

regulated

for (30th),

no and

No. given

Sensitive

sender

meeting,

and current

correspondence,

did

accepted

necessary. other use

903

of as

very

new

purposes.

not

Restricted

after

object,

by 12..Registered

only.

place

tnformation

the

secure.

checks

and

little

feel

this

of and residents

with

replying

the

11th

viruses,

future

that

Information,

message

was as but

Financial

The

the

us.

exercise

and

The as

such May

the

any

for

sent.

it message

alike.

above replying residents to

Royal

considers

where were

website

could authorised

questions

Office:

and

The and

and

Conduct

Turning

the

despite

Bank

only

not

any

Bank

this

to then Royal

and

responsibility

suggests

received get

attend

this advised

appropriate. personnel

were

attachments

was

lead

this

delete

the

Authority

fresh

Bank

Scotland

message

Andrew

discussed,

Scotland

into answered

fact

the

this

air,

the

only

this

period

building the anyone

and will

you

plc

had

plc

but,

the

Is 9May2Ol5

West Mr CivicCentre Development

Livingston EH54 Howden Dear Re:

The I in •

•

write

order

The This development.

when assumes full West

and as

did speaker of Last would

(looks being Lothian land Planning order master

reasons

to Building safer Norman in

Mr Lothian

6FF

the

with

the

mine

three

not Scotland

land

is to

was

Norman South

year

behind

Lothian

this fact

not surveyor

and like vary

purchased

seem regards

plan

Council

and

maintain works

discussed given for

of Council

the Management on

suitable

would Application

that

block

stronger which Road

the Block

my our for

land to officials

received land pleased Council

there

that

survey.

achieve. five to

Winchburgh in

opposition

officials house

Planning

which you

J the

the

this

immediately his

for

this on in

Scottish at for

returned

was

attending

ambience and

report above

any seek this

property a

the

has This 02871MSC11

Manager communities had

is full

letter at

land

not housing housing plan.

earmarked

plan)

Services a I just

mentioned community

showed

stated

outline

Government would planning

public to

clear grant

from

being

behind this

been agricultural I

wish

2000

a developers

development

“this

incorporate West meeting it

meeting

below:

planning 5

village.

returned

unsafe

was

left

any for application ..%MY\C

our

this

Scotland

the

meeting

land

oppose

Lothian a

strategic found

documentation

house

fact public

purchase

go land.

were

deep

and

is permission

open

unsuitable publicly.

its I . I

either which

this subsequent

attendance.

This

seed.

become Council which

attended

unaware

park

mine

Repbednmon.a.nns.,nnnn

objectives

former ‘;‘..*

green planning

unsuitable

piece

,.•.

and now cxric

lays

works

the

seeks

‘,t.ihttrn

Planning

for

use

of with

order

green

quote public

property or

public

of not

marketing

this

of any

which

application. in to

reminded land

obligation

M6fl&Qflh4V4

senior

fit

healthier,

the for

isçts

to revise

Tippet

the significant space part

significant ois spaces

Ci11xk;iI for

park.

Services

at build

housing

future”. were

was ,., -

senior

housing

officials

the

materials,

For Knowes

the the

has housing

subject West

and

flooded

greener rvl Winchburgh

masterplan

EH52

West the

The advising detail

all plans

and building speaker

opposition

but

parks

from La C

Lothian

Councils

time

Road to I the it

one

and

the

6UL

and

ccij

13 S S

• Looking to change the master plan so early in the process does not bode well for the residents of Wirichburgh and one now wonders ifthere is going to be any green space or parks left in the plan.

• Scottish Ministers signed offthe master plan and West Lothian Council ifthey grant planningpermission for this revision could find that they willbe in the situation of the plan being called in by the reporters. The reporters on behalf of Scottish Ministers have a legal obligation to do so in order to review the master plan ifthere are going to be significant deviations which were signed off and ifthis is in opposition to clear Scottish Government policy. This would therefore jeopardise the redevelopment as until Scottish Ministers were satisfied with the master plan no more development work would be allowed to continue.

• I am concerned for the stability of my property. When the ground works for the Barratt development was taking place our house was shaking when pile drivers were being used. Granting planning to build on unstable land is going to require significant grouridworks and there would be a significant risk of undermining the foundations of our properties, along with the risk of subsidence.

of • I can find no reference to the number of houses proposed for this land and the types dwelling that are being proposed. Building up to the boundary willmean the upper storey of any development willoverlook our property. I have tried to access this online

• and can find no records other than a Companies House registration for Winchburgh Developments Limited.

• There are issues with the drainage of water as ifthe mine works are significantly flooded then one asks where is the water going to go. We are therefore concerned of the risk of significant flooding to our properties ifthis process is not properly managed.

• I am concerned ifsignificant problems are discovered when doing the significant ground works this could have a serious detrimental impact on our properties ifplanning permission is granted to build housing on this piece of land.

I would be grateful ifthis letter of opposition to this planning application is considered along with the reasons for my opposition.

Robert A Boyter

cc. Ms Fiona Hyslop MSP 0Dunn Maureen From: P’anning Sent: 22 May 2015 11:12 To: McCarriston,Wendy Subject: Comments for PlanningApplkation LIVE/0287/MSC/15

Planning Application comments have been made. A summary of the comments is provided below.

Comments were submitted at 11:12 AMon 22 May 2015 from Mrs Linda Monaghan. Application Summary Address; Block), Winchburgh Approval of matters specified in conditions of planning Proposal: permission 1012/Pf05 for revised masterplan to reflect variation of Block J boundary (grid ref. 308098 674911) Case Officer: Wendy McCorriston çlick for further information

Customer Details Name: Mrs Linda Monaghan Email: Address: 37 tippet knowes road Winchburgh West Lothian

Comments Details Commenter Neighbour Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Application Reasons for comment; Comments As a long term resident in the Barratts housing estate in Winchburgh I stronqly object to the changes to block) proposed - last year residents received a letter from west Lothian council plannng services advising us of the fact land was being returned to its former use as part of the plans (what appears to be block j on the plans) as it was found unsuitable for housing and that the land to the rear of my neighbours properties would become a public park. This was so well received in the community as a public park would be of so much benefit to all - and a critical assistance in merging current established residents of winchburgh with New residents - essential for success of future winchburgh village

The piece of land would for the time being be used as agricultural land. This piece of land at j2 has but the adjacent piece of land ji has been left to go to seed I quote WLCofficials ‘wburgh would incorporate green public spaces and parks to maintain ambience of a viilage

1 McCorriston, Wendy

From: McCorriston, Wendy Sent: 04 August 2015 14:51 To: McCorriston, Wendy Subject: FW:BlockJ, Winchburgh - (grid ref. 308098 674911)

From: Sent: 19 May 2015 17:19 To: McCorriston,Wendy Subject: Block), Winchburgh - (grid ref. 308098 674911)

With reference to the above Application to build on this plot, we object on the grounds that this area was deemed unsuitable previously because of the flooded mines underneath and also because of the gas piping in the area.

It was agreed that this area would be parkiand.

This is a complete change of use and should go back to the appropriate Minister.

Alice Deighton Thomas Deighton 34 Tippet Knowes Road Winchburgh

1 ___

McCorriston, Wendy

From: McCorriston,Wendy Sent: 04 August 2015 14:51 To: McCorriston, Wendy Subject: FW:0287/MSC/15

Con From: Sent: 29 May 2015 13:18 LC( To: McCorriston, Wendy Cc’rvi Subject: RE: 0287/MSC/15 - [INTERNALONLY]

Wendy,

Iwould liketo submit the following comment regarding 0287/MSC/15:

Currently and also once the Master plan is completed; it is closer for myself and daughter (from Tippet

Knowes Court) to walk in the direction of the ‘oldWinchburgh’ to find any green space to utilise. Ithink to best encourage the old and new parts of the development to integrate, the area which had been foreseen to be a road, should be now used for the community; combining areas for children and anyone wanting to participate in outdoor activity.

Also, I have not received the updated plan which you mentioned in your earlier email.

Regards,

Louise Purdy

1 To: Dunn, Subject Sent From:

Comments Planning Address: Application

CllckfoLibJflfrmLjQfl Case

Proposal: Customer

Address: Name: Type: Email: Comments Stance: Commenter

comment: Reasons

Comments:

Officer:

Maureen

Appcation

for

were

Details

Approval Mr variation Block Wendy 37 permission Details

Summary

Customer Neighbour and to converted

madterplan. My

their new Also What Its green (eeIy Winchburgh housing This process

new terms submitted

tippet Christopher

everyone

wife

used

comments

residents

Winchburgh looking

chidren

strongly

good

McCorriston

space

Winchburgh

the

and

of of

does

would knowes

children daily

parkiand

objects

1012/P/05

Block matters

perfect

does

I In

This

and to

pdrkland

Comments

22 McCorriston, Pla

not

11:19

lovely

have

Monaghan

object

the

have

change

parks

nrñng

May

road

meet

piece to

bode

dog

to should.

simply

boundary wonder

spot

village

offer

specified

lived

scenic

the 2015

been

for

left Winchburgh

walkers,

This

well

something the of

for

your

Planning

revised

wrong Wendy

11:18

and land

and

green

made.

Planning

Winchburgh

walks

master 22 green

Winchburgh

for

the

there

(grid

destroy in

revised

enjoy

May

should

parents

the

conditions

believe

plan for

land

masterplan

and

space Application

ref.

wonderful West

Application

plan

residents

2015

summary

all

going

life

this

plans

between

children

308098

bar

and

will

for will

Lothian

from

kept

the

early

Winch to

many

allow carers

further

planning

of with to

LIVE/0287/MSCI15

be the

playing

developers Mr

674911)

reflect

the

any

burgh

is aid

Christopher years

asset

and

taking

the

and

build

comments

and

Monaghan.

provided

c1$1,5

below.

I:: cd- 15r

FAO:- Wendy McCorriston West LothianCMc Centre t-lowdenSouth Road Howden Livingston EH548FF

ApplicationNumber: LIVEIO2B7/MSC/15 Address: BlockJ Winchburgh Proposal: Approvalofmatters specifiedin conditionsof planningpermission 1012/P/05 for revised masterplan to reflectvariationof BlockJ boundary (gridref. 308098 874911) Case Officer:Wendy McCorriston Customer Details Name: 4EmLf czEcc14E Address:q4TlppetKnowes Road, Wlnchburgh EH52 Cornmentar Type: Neighbour Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Application

I strongly abject to the proposal for block J on the Master Plan Wlnchburgh Development especially forthe residents of the existing Barrett housing due to Health and Safety issues:

HEALThANDSAFETY

• EXISTINGGAS MAINThe removal of the existingpossible road brings intoplay the dangerous problemof the proposed new carriage especially over an existing gas main in a builtup area. As there is a safer waywithoutthis, using the existingproposed roacLthis proposal should not be accepted. Increased fumes from trafficwould increase health problems previous suffered with shale mining.

* SAFETYNat sufficientconsideration has been given to construction trafficaccess; especially due to the number of children Inthe area, The access road wouldbecome a rat run, withdanger forchildren and residents alike

ENVIRONMENTALFinallythe proposed new development willdestroy one of the very few green spaces available to encourage wildlifein this area and the applicationshould be dismissed on this criterionalone. Wildlifehabitat would be destroyed and the character of the area affected as less green spaces survive.The area requires to retain trees and grass covered spaces to enhance the environment.

Yoursfaithfully Howden Howden Livingston West Application Address FAO EH54 Case masterplan Address Commenter Proposal Name: especially Customer I Stance:

HEALTh

•

Yours

strongly

there

shale problem for due SAFETY accepted. EXISTING

this enhance spaces ENVIRONMENTAL less

children

Lothian

Officer:

6FF

criterion

faithfully

green Wendy

Customer

mining.

South

AILs1 p.jippet

the

Block

AND

object

available Approval

Details for

Number: the

Not to

safer

Type

Increased

number

GAS

spaces the

Civic

Wendy

the

and

reflect

McCorriston

alone

SAFETY Road

environment.

sufficient

proposed

way residents

Wlnchburgh

Knowes

residents

Neighbour

objects

MAIN

the

Centre

of £tG’t to

UVE10287/MSC/1

variation

survive of

McCorrlston

Wildlife

encourage matters

without

Finally

proposal

fumes

children

The

consideration

Road,

new

alike

the

The

removal

habitat from

the

this,

specified of

carriage, for

Block

Planning

proposed wildlife

Wlnchburgh

existing

area

the

using

traffic

block

would

area of

requires

has

boundary

the the

would

especially J

Application

conditions

Barrett

this

new

been

The

existing existing

the

EH52

destroyed

area

increase

development

access

given

housing

Master

retain

(grid

over

and

possible

proposed of

planning

ref.

road

trees

the health

and

Plan

construction

due

308098

existing

application

would

will

the

road

to and

Winchburgh

road!

problems

permission

Health

destroy

character

grass

brings

674911)

become

gas

this

traffic

and should

main

covered proposal

one

into

Development

101

a Safety

access;

play the

In CI%Ck:—

rat

2/P/05

the

spaces

run,

area

should

built

dismissed

suffered the

issues

very

especially

with

dangerous

affected

for

few

not

area

revised -

danger

with

green

w c&c)4

FAO : Wendy McCorriston West Lothian CivicCentre Howden South Road Howden LIvingston EH546FF

Application Number: LIVE102871MSCI15 Address: BlockJ, Wlnchburgh Proposal: Approval of matters specified in conditions of planning permission 1012)P/05 for revised masterptan to reflect vanation of BlockJ boundary (grid ref. 308098 6741 1> Case Officer:Wendy McCornston Customer Details Name: aeiZ pi1/”I Address1ippet Knowes Road, Winchburgh EH52 Commenter type: Neighbour Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Application

Istrongly object to the proposal for blockJ on the Master Plan Winchburgh Development especially for the residents of the existing Barrett housing due to Health and Safety issues:

HEALThANDSAFETY

EXISTINGGAS MAINThe removal of the existing possible road brings into play the dangerous problem of the proposed new carnage, especially over an existing gas main in a builtup area. As there is a safer way without this, using the existing proposed road, this proposal should not be accepted. Increased fumes from trafficwould increase health problems previous suffered with shale mining.

SAFETY Not sufficient consideration has been given to construction trafficaccess; especially due to the number of children in the area The access road would become a rat run, with danger for children and residents alike.

ENVIRONMENTALFinallythe proposed new development willdestroy one of the very fewgreen spaces available to encourage wildlifein this area and the application should be dismissed on this criterion alone. Wildlifehabitat would be destroyed and the character of the area affected as less green spaces survive. The area requires to retain trees and grass covered spaces to enhance the environment.

• -

. 10sf

West Application

Address: Howden Livingston Commenter EH54 1-lowden Proposal: FAO especially Address:iaçflppet Case Customer Stance: Name; masterpian

I HEALTh

Yours

strongly

for due shale This there SAFETY accepted. enhance problem EXISTING

spaces less ENVIRONMENTAL :-

children

Lothian

Officer:

6FF

criterion

faithfully

green

Wendy

mining.

Customer

4oA4e

South

the

Block

AND

object

available Approval

9etails

for

the

Not Number:

safer

Type:

Increased

number

GAS

spaces

the

Civic

Wendy the and

reflect

McCorriston

alone.

SAFETY

environment.

Road

sufficient

proposed

way residents

Winchburgh

Knowes residents

Neighbour

MAIN objects

the

Centre

survive. LIVE/0287/MSC!1 variation of

McCorrlston

Wildlife

encourage

matters

without

Finally

proposal

fumes

children

The

consideration

TAy/o

Road

new

alike,

the

The

the

removal

habitat from

the

this,

specified f

carriage,

for in

Block

Planning

wildlife proposed

Winchburgh

existing

area

the

using

traffic

block

would

of area.

requires

has

boundary

in the

the

would

‘J

especially

Barren Application conditions

this on

new

been

The

existing existing

the

EHS2

destroyed

area

increase

development

access

given

housing

Master

retain

(gild

over

and

possible proposed of

planning

ret.

road

trees

the health

and

Plan

construction

due

308098

existing

application

would

will

the

road

and

Wlnchburgh

road,

problems

permission

Health

destroy

character

grass

brings

become 674911)

gas

this

Q%thL

traffic

should

and

main

covered proposal

one

into

Development of

101

Safety a

access;

the play

rat

2/P/05

the

a i(5

spaces

run1

area

should

dismissed built

suffered

the

issues;

very

especially

with

dangerous

affected

for

few

not

area.

revised

danger

with

green

As West Address El-fM Howden Application Livingston Howden

FAQ masterpian Proposal Customer Case Commenter Address Name; especially Stance I HEALTh

•

strongly

there SAFETY shale accepted EXISTING problem this [or due enhance less ENVIRONMENTAL spaces ;-

children

Lothian

Officer

6FF

critenon to

green

Wendy

mining.

Customer

South

the

iiLppet

Block

4-IELCa

AND

object

available Approval

Details

for

the

Number: Not

safer

Type;

increased

number

spaces GAS

the

Ciic

Wendy

and the

reflect

McConistori

alone

SAFETY environment.

Road

sufficient

proposed

way

residents

Winchburgh

Knowes

residents

Neighbour objects MAIN

the

Centre

to of

LIVE/0287/MSCI1 survive. variation of

McCorriston

Wildlife

CkEiRLt

encourage matters

without

Finally

proposal

fumes

children

The

consideration

Road1

new

alike.

the

The

the

removal

habitat from

this, the

specified

carriage,

for

in —

Block

Planning

proposed

wildlife

Winchburgh

existing

area

the

using

traffic

block

would

area.

requires

has

boundary

the in the

would

J especially

conditions Application Ban-ett

this

new

been

The

existing

the

El-152

destroyed

area

increase

development

access

given

housing

Master

retain

(grid

over

and

possible

proposed

planning

ref

road

trees

the an

health

and

Plan

construction

due

308098

existing

application

would

will

the

road

and to

Winchburgh

road,

problems

permission

Health

destroy

character

grass

brings

ci.Ck

become

874911)

gas

this

traffic

should and

main

covered proposal

one

Into

Development

101

a Safety

access;

play the

rat

21P105

the

spaces

run,

area

should

built

dismissed

suffered the

issues:

very

especially

with

dangerous

affected

for

few

not

area

revised

danger

with

green

As (1J4 0za7/msc//s

FAO:- Wendy McCorriston West LothianCivicCentre Howden South Road Howden Livingston EH54 6FF

Application Number:L1VE10287/MSC/15 Address: BlockJ, Winchburgh Proposal: Approvalof matters specified InconditiDnsof planning permission 10121P105for revised masterplan to reflectvariationof BlockJ boundary (gridret. 308098 674911) Case Officer:Wendy McCorriston Customer Details Name: LouisE HAbJLC Address:%Tippet Knowes Road, Wlnchburgh EH52 Comrnenter Type;Neighbour Stance: Customer objects to the PlanningApplication

Istronglyobject to the proposal for blockJ on the Master Plan WinchburghDevelopment especially forthe residents of the existing Barrett housingdue to Health and Safety issues:-

HEALTH ANDSAFETY

EXISTINGGAS MAINThe removal of the existing possIble road brings into playthe dangerous problem of the proposed new carriage, especially over an existInggas main in a buIltup area. As there is a safer way without this,using the existing proposed road, this proposal should not be accepted. Increased fumes from trafficwould Increase health problems previoussufferedwith shale mining.

• SAFETYNotsufficientconsideration has been given to construction trafficaccess; especially due to the number of children in the area. The access road would become a rat run, withdanger for childrenand residents alike.

• ENVIRONMENTALFinallythe proposed new development willdestroy one of the very few green spaces available to encourage wildlifein this area and the applicationshould be dismissed on this criterionalone. Wildlifehabitat wouldbe destroyed and the character of the area affected as less green spaces survIve.The area requIres to retain trees and grass covered spaces to enhance the environment.

Yoursfaithfully •

•

West FAO Customer Howden Appcation Address: Howden especially AddressTippet Case Commenter Proposal: masterp EHS4 Livingston I Stance: Name:

HEALTH *

• •

Yours

strongly

enhance problem accepted. there for due SAFETY shale this EXISTING spaces ENVIRONMENTAL Tess :-

children

Lothian

Officer:

criterion 6FF

faithfully

green

Wendy

mining.

Ian Customer

South

the

Block AND

object

available

Approval

a fl’

Details for

the

Not

Number:

safer

Type:

Increased

number

spaces GAS the

CMc

the Wendy

and

reflect

McCornston

alone.

environment. SAFETY

Road

sufficient

proposed

way

residents

Winchburgh

Knowes

residents

Neighbour

objects

MAIN

the

Centre

LIVEJO2S7/MSC/1 survive. variation

McCorriston

Wildlife

encourage

without matters

Finally

proposal

fumes

children

The

consideration

Road,

new

alike.

the

The

the

removal

habitat

from

the

this,

specified

carrIage,

for in

Block

Planning

wildlife proposed

Wlnchburgh

existing

area

the

using

traffic

block

would

of area.

requires 5

has

in the boundary the

would

J especially

Barrett Application conditions

this

new

been be

The

existing existing

the

EH52

destroyed

area

increase

development

access

cck—

given

housing

Master

retain

(grid

over

and

possible

proposed of

planning

ref.

road

trees

the

health

arid

Plan

construction

due

308098

existing

application

would

will

the

road

and

Winchburgh

road,

problems

permission

Health

destroy

character

grass

bnngs

become 674911)

gas

this

traffic

should

and

main

covered proposal

one

into

Development

101

Safety a

access;

play

the

rat

2/P/05

the

spaces

run, area

should

built

dismissed

suffered

the

issues:

very

especially

with

dangerous

affected

for

few

not

area.

revised

danger

with

green

As ctc1’ 11{

FAO :- Wendy McCorriston West LothianCivic Centre Howden South Road Howden . Livingston EH54 6FF

ApplicationNumber:LIVE/0287/MSC/15 Address: BlockJ, Wlnchburgh Proposal: Approvalof matters specified in conditions of planning permission 1012/P/05 forrevised masterpian to reflectvariationof BlockJ boundary (gridreL 308098 674911) Case Officer:Wendy McCorristan Customer Details Name: -j Address: tIflppef Knawes Road, WinchburghEH52 Commenter Type:Neighbour Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Appilcatlon

Istronglyobject to the proposal for blockJ on the Master Plan WinchburghDevelopment especially forthe residents of the existing Barrett housing due to Healthand Safety issues:

HEALThANDSAFETY

EXISTINGGAS MAINThe removal of the existing possible road brings intoplay the dangerous problem of the proposed new carriage, especially over an existinggas main Ina builtup area. As there Is a safer way withoutthis, using the existing proposed road, this proposal should not be accepted. Increased fumes fromtrafficwould increase health problems previous sufferedwith shale mining,

• SAFETYNotsufficientconsideration has been given to constructiontrafficaccess; especially due to the number of children in the area. The access road wouldbecome a rat runewithdanger forchildrenand residents alike,

• ENVIRONMENTALFinallythe proposed new development willdestroy one ofthe very fewgreen spaces available to encourage wildlifein this area and the application should be dismissed on this criterionalone. Wildlifehabitat wouldbe destroyed and the character of the area affected as less green spaces survive.The area requires to retain trees and grass covered spaces to enhance the environment.

Yoursfaithfully

£IIIIIIII i.Iiww o4

FAQ : Wendy McCorriston West Lothian CivicCentre Howden South Road Howden Livingston EH646FF

ApplicationNumber: UVEIO287IMSCI15 Address: BlockJ, Winchburgh Proposal: Approval of matters specified in conditions of planning permission 10I2JP/05 for revised masterplan to reflectvariationof BlockJ boundary (gridret. 308098 674911) Case Officer:Wendy McCorriston Customer Details Name: keJ*.s LI4C’j Address:flppet Knowes Road, WlnchburghEH52 Commenter Type: Neighbour Stance: Customer objects to the PlanningApplication

Istronglyobject to the proposal for blockJ on the Master Plan WinchburghDevelopment especially for the residents of the existing Barrett housingdue to Health and Safety issues:-

HEALTHANDSAFETY

EXISTINGGAS MAINThe removal of the existingpossible road brings intoplaythe dangerous problem at the proposed new carriage, especiallyaver an existing gas main In a builtup area, As there is a safer way withoutthis, using the existing proposed road this proposal should not be accepted. Increased fumes fromtrafficwouldincrease health problems previous sufferedwith shale mining.

SAFETY Notsufficientconsideration has been given to construction trafficaccess; especially due to the number of children in the area. The access road wouldbecome a rat runswithdanger for childrenand residents alike.

ENVIRONMENTALFinallythe proposed new development willdestroy one of the very fewgreen spaces available to encourage wildlifeinthis area and the applicationshould be dismissed on this criterionalone. Wildlifehabitat would be destroyed arid the character of the area affected as less green spaces survive. The area requires to retain trees and grass covered spaces to enhance the nuronment.

Yoursfaithfully FAO:- Wendy MoCorriston West LothianCivicCentre Howden South Road Howden Livingston EH546FF

ApplicationNumber:LIVE/0287/M$C115 Address: BlockJ Winchburgh Proposal:Approvalof matters specified in conditionsat planningpermission 1012/P/05 for revised masterplan to reflectvariationof BlockJ boundary (gridref. 308098 674911) Case Officer:Wendy MaCorriston Customeretails Name:4-4k €ikc’ Address%Tippet Knowes Road, WinchburghEH52 Commenter Type: Neighbour Stance; Customer objects to the PlanningApplication

Istrongly otject to the proposal for blockJ on the Master Plan WinchburghDevelopment especially for the residents of the existing Barrett housing due to Health and Safety lssues:

HEALTHAND SAFETY

EXISTINGGAS MAINThe removal of the existing possible road brings into play the dangerous problem ofthe proposed new carriage, especially over an existinggas main in a builtup area. As there is a safer way withoutthis, using the existingproposed road, this proposal should not be accepted. Increased fumes fromtrafficwouldIncrease health problems previous suffered with shale mining.

SAFETYNot sufficientconsideration has been given to construction trafficaccess; especially due to the number of children in the area. The access road would become a rat runtwithdanger forchildren and residents alike.

ENVIRONMENTALFinallythe proposed new development willdestroy one of the very few green spaces available to encourage wildlifein this area and the applicationshould be dismissed on this criterion alone. Wildlifehabitat would be destroyed and the character of the area affected as less green spaces survive. The area requires to retain trees and grass covered spaces to enhance the environment.

: FAO :- Wendy McCarriston West LothianCivicCentre Howden South Road Howden Livingston EN54 6FF

Application Number:LIVE/02871MS0/15 Address: BlockJ, Winchburgh Proposal: Approvalof matters specified in conditionsof planning permission 1012/P/05for revised rnasterplan to reflectvariationof BlockJ boundary (gridret 308098 674911) Case Officer:Wendy McCorrston Customer Details Name: ANN Address:1ippet Knowes Road,WirrchburghEH52 GommenterType:Neighbour Stance: Customer objects to the PlanningApplication

Istronglyobject to the proposal for blockJ on the Master Plan WinchburghDevelopment especiallyfor the residents at the existing Barretthousingdue to Health and Safety Issues:

HEALThANDSAFETY

EXISTINGGAS MAINThe ramaval of the existingpossible road brings into play the dangerous problemof the proposed new carriage, especially over an existinggas main in a builtup area. As there is a safer way withoutthis, using the existingproposedroad, thisproposalshould notbe aocepted Increased fumes from trafficwould increase health problems previous sufferedwith shale mining.

SAFETY Nat sufficientconsideration has been given to construction trafficaccess; especially due to the number of children in the area. The access road wouldbecome a rat run, withdanger for children and residents alike.

ENVIRONMENTALFinallythe proposed new development willdestroy one ofthe very fewgreen spaces available to encourage wildlifein this area and the application should be dismissed on this criterion alone. Wildlifehabitat would be destroyed and the character of the area affected as less green spaces survive. The area requires to retain trees and grass covered spaces to enhance the environment.

Yoursfaithfully Application Howden Howden Address: Livingston West FAO El-tM AddressvaTippet especially Stance: Commenter Case Name: Customer I masterplan Proposal: HEALTh • • • Yours strongly shale accepted. there EXISTING this for due problem enhance spaces SAFETY less ENVIRONMENTAL :- children Lothian Officer; 6FF criterion to faithfully green Wendy is Customer mining,

Aw¼jir South the Block AND object available Approval a Details for of the Number: Not to safer Type: increased number spaces GAS the Civic Wendy and the reflect McCorriston alone. SAFETY environment. Road J, sufficient to proposed way residents Wlrichburgh Knowes residents

Rm Neighbour objects MAIN the Centre to of LIV variation survive. of McCon’iston Wildlife encourage matters without Finally proposal fumes children E/0287/MSC/1 The consideration to Road, new of alike. the The the removal habitat from the this, ot specified carriage, for in BlockJ Planning proposed wildlife Wlnchburgh existing area the using traffic block would of area. 5 requires has in the in boundary the would J especially Application Barrett conditions on this new been be The existing existing the EH52 destroyed area Increase to development access given housing Master retain (grid over and possible proposed of to planning ret road trees the health an and Plan construction due 308098 existing application would will the road and to Winchburgh

ca..ckj road, problems permission Health destroy character grass brings become 674911) gas this traffic should and main

i(tS covered proposal one previous into Development of 101 Safety a access; of play the in rat be 2/P/OS the a spaces run, area should built dismissed suffered the Issues: very especially with dangerous affected for up few to not area. revised danger with on green be as As Howden Livingston Howden West FAQ Address: Application EH54 Address;5hippet masterplan Commente.r Proposal;

Case Customer Name: especially Stance:

HEALTh

•

Yours

strongly

there

shale EXISTING problem accepted, for SAFETY due spaces

enhance this ENVIRONMENTAL

less

Lothian

children

Officer;

6FF

criterion

Wendy

faithfully

green

mining.

Customer

South

the

Block

AND

object Approval

available a

Details

tor

5.ctnjorj of

Number;

the Not to

safer

Type:Neighbour

Increased

number

GAS

spaces the

Civic

Wendy

the

and

reflect

Mccorrlston

Road alone. SAFETY

environment.

sufficient

proposed

way

residents

Winchburgh

Knowes

residents

objects

MAIN

the Centre

LIVEIO2B7!MSC/1

variation

survive. of

McCorriston

Wildlife

matters

encourage

without

Finally

proposal

fumes

children

The

consideration

Road,

new

alike.

the

the The

removal

from

habitat the

specified this1 of

carriage,

for

Block

Planning

proposed wildlife

Wlnchburgh

existing

area

the

using

traffic

block

would

area.

requires

has

boundary

the the

would

especially

conditions

Application Barrett

this

new

been

The

existing existing

the

EH52

destroyed

area

increase

development

access

given

housing

Master

retain (grid

over

and

possible

proposed

planning

ref.

road

trees

health an the

and Plan

construction due

308098

existing

application

would

will

the

road

and

Winchburgh

road,

problems

permission

Health

destroy

character

grass

brings

674911)

become

gas

this ctcv

traffic

and

should

main

proposal covered

one previous

into

Development

1012/Pit5

Safety

access;

of play

the in

n(s(s

rat

the

spaces

run,

area

should

built

dismissed

the suffered

Issues:

very

especially

with

dangerous

for

affected

few

not

area.

revised

danger

with

on green

As Sent McCorriston, To: From:

Subject

DATA To: Sent:2SMay2OtStS:01 From: Subject

Appli Application

Address: Proposal: masterplan Case Address: Name: Customer

Comment Commenter Comment Stance: residents

HEALTH without of traffic EXISTING

SAFETY

residents number

available ENVIRONMENTAL area Wildlife

strongly

the

Planning

Officer: cation

LABEL:

requires

Muriel

proposed

Muriel would

Customer

OB)ECION this,

BlockS,

Approval of

habitat

Details alike.

Details object Reasons: to

Not

AND children

Number: Summary

Gilligan

Type:

the Tippet

INTERNAL encourage

GAS

using

Wendy reflect

increase

to Gilligan Wendy

sufficient

existing

new

retain

would

SAFETY

Wincbburgh

objects

Neighbour

MAIN

h existing the Knowes I of the

variation

carriage, LIVEIO287IMSC/ McCoriiston

matters

health

the

Planning

trees

proposal

ONLY

wildlife

Finally

Barrett

consideration

area.

destroyed The

Road,

the

and

problems

specified

Christie, especially 25

FW; McCorriston,

Application

removal proposed

the

The housing

Planning

for

grass

Block

May

OBJECTION

this Winchburgh,

proposed

block

access

and

2015

Linda

oee spaces covered

area

J has previous

due

boundary

over

road,

Application the

conditions

Wendy

15:59

the

road been

on on and

new character

existing behalf

the

this

Health

the

would

suffered Planning

given

existing EH52

development

Master

(grid

proposal

application

and

of to 1

possible

become

6UL Planning

planning

ref.

enhance

Application

with

construction the

gas

Plan

Safety

308098 should

area

main

shale

Winchburgh

should will

jL road

the rat permission

issues:-

affected

not

destroy

mining.

674911) run,

brings

environment.

[INTERNAL

traffic

built

with

dismissed

accepted.

into one a-TLS(5

Development

access;

101

less

danger

area. ONLY]

play

2/P/05

green

the

FYI

Increased

especially

As the

for

very

this

for spaces

there

dangerous

children

especially

‘f

criterion revised

few

‘3Y

fumes

survive.

due

green

and

safer

problem

alone.

for

from

the spaces

The way

the cx&- tj(S

FAO :- Wendy McCorriston West Lothian Civic Centre Howderi South Road Howder, Livingston EH54 6FF

Application Number: LIVE/02871MSC115 Address BlockJ, Winchburgh Proposal:Approval of matters specified in conditionsof planning permission 1012/P)5 for revised masterplan to reflect variation of BlockJ boundary (grid ref. 308098 674911) Case Officer:Wendy McComston Customer Details A Name: dv%4 11 Addres Tip at Knowes Road,4-J Winchburgh EH52 Commenter Type:Neighbour Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Application

I strongly object to the proposal for block J on the Master Plan Winchburgh Development especially for the residents of the existing Barrett housing due to Health and Safety issues:

HEALThANDSAFETY

* EXISTINGGAS MAINThe removal of the existing possible road brings intoplaythe dangerous problem of the proposed new caniage especially over an existing gas main in a builtup area. As there Is a safer way without this, using the existing proposed road, this proposal should not be accepted. Increased fumes fromtrafficwouldincrease health problems previous suffered with shale minrng.

• SAFETYNot sufficient consideration has been given to construction trafficaccess; especially due to the number of children in the area. The access road would become a rat run, withdanger forchildrenand residents alike.

• ENVIRONMENTALFinallythe proposed new development willdestroy one of the very few green spaces available to encourage wildlifein this area and the application should be dismissed on this criterionalone. Wildlifehabitat would be destroyed and the character of the area affected as less green spaces survive. The area requires to retain trees and grass covered spaces to enhance the environment.

Yours faithfully ck X7(5( t

FAG :- Wendy McCorrlstan West Lothian Civic Centre Howden South Road Howden Livingston EHS4 6FF

Application Number: L1VE10287/MSC115 Address: BlockJ, Winchburgh Proposal: Approval of matters specified in conditions of planning permission 10121P/05 for revised masterplan to reflect variation of BlockJ boundary (grid ref. 308098 674911) Case Officer:Wendy McCorriston Customer Details Name; SiJ5iW KIV4fl Addressflppet Knowes Road, Winchburgh EH52 Commenter Type: Neighbour Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Application

I strongly object to the proposal for block J on the Master Plan Winchburgh Development especially tar the residents of the existing Barrett housing due to Health and Safety Issues:

HEALTHAND SAFETY

EXISTINGGAS MAINThe removal of the existing possible road brings into play the dangerous problem of the proposed new carriage, especially over an existinggas main in a built up area. As there is a safer way without this, using the existing proposed road, this proposalshould not be accepted Increased fumes fromtrafficwould increase health problems previous suffered with shale mining

SAFETY Not sufficient consideration has been given to construction trafficaccess; especially due to the number of children in the area. The access road would become a rat run, withdanger for children and residents alike.

ENVIRONMENTALFinallythe proposed new development willdestroy one 01the very few green spaces available to encourage wildlifein this area and the application should be dismissed on this criterion alone, Wildlifehabitat would be destroyed and the character of the area affected as less green spaces survive The area requires to retain trees and grass covered spaces to enhance the environment.

Yours faithfully J

Sent To; Dunn, Subject From:

DATA Sent: From: To:

Subject:

As Oblection Dear

and seeks I area. right or infrastructure revised

the low I area assumption. number

and the route structure certainly runs

plans

proposed plans I It

Regards, Matthew

have

recently

understand

scaling

Planning

development

estimated

enough the

for

will

resident

past

to where

LABEL:

into

Mcilwaine,

for will

recently

Maureen

well these plan

site

will

was be May Norman,

Objection

remove

seems

the to

Mcllwaine my attended

have back

Broxbruri

amendments

built.

for

then

many

traverse that in

2015 is

They

INTERNAL

planning door.

road, of

the

reasons

number,

excess

approved

moved

the

of be

Winchburgh

Matthew

support

diverting to

While

not the

company revised

15:49

the

children

quoted

accurate,

their

sound This proposed which a

and

planning

provide proposed the

local

proposed

into

that

the

given

notice

wellbeing. ONLY

will

the

(HR

main

200-330 with

plan

even

traffic

numbers

completely

council

the

now

proposed were

have

building

surrounding

request

Control

I notice I the

road

the

would wish

it,

has

gas

Christie, new 01

McCorriston, FW: 02871MSC11

road

live

road through

necessary

present.

built existing

June

a addition

cars.

meeting

under

been

Objection line

0287/MSC/15

far

Barratt

in and

and

submit

that of

network road

would formally

Assurance) unacceptable. the

2015

Linda

greater

would

play

drawn Representatives

instead

the

area

permission

size

They 3000

region

will

at development Wendy

08:11

infrastructure

that

Street

stifl

more original,

which

be NN;

risks

and not of

lodge

detriment

planning

behalf

attempted new

be it

divert

costly.

the of

be daily

is revisions

was

so housing

diverting

further 2OO300

representatives

homes

still

village

is The

the

approved

will

all

deemed not

result

notice

basis.

Are Planning

far objections

main

from

initial be

to traffic

granted from

Winchburgh

too and in

access

traffic cars

used advise

of 028?/MSC/15

block

However the

the

route

quality

plan

much

now masterplan.

the

through

their residents

the

making

area

development by

through

for

masterplan

that

large

Broxbum

from provided

sacrificing

into

houses

the

traffic

acceptable.

the

Any

these —

immediately

the the

Edinburgh

life

which have

entire,

use

both

above number

near

revision

what

The street

traffic in

changes

than

the of

and

West direct

serious

Winchburgh

plans

will

(INTERNAL

company

extended the

noted for

proposed

changes

Devon

mine.

the

volumes

now

only completely

City,

street.

Wlncbburah

Lothian

houses through adjacent

which

over

the

surrounding

reservations

planning

increase

the

aeopposing lake

infrastructure

residential

contend

also

village

ONLY)

pounds?

will necessary

revised

Even

than

were

masterplan.

Council

live,

that

noted

residential refute

notice.

block

the

have —

sufficiently

indeed

the

that

this

area. plan

which

this

about

original

and

that

this

main

been

the

plan

the

a Dunn, From: Subject Sent

To: DATA

To: Sent: From:

Subject:

Qbjectlon Dear As

for I proposed c. completely housing access diverting

development They enough I

accurate. will existing now so

the on amendments I

tis It have Regards,

The Rebecca

Square,

recently

understand

3000

the

wifl

Planning

their

resident

not road,

for

live

quoted

29 LABEL:

Royal

recently Brodie,

Maureen

Broxburn

proposed

new

that Norman, in these be

size

May

wellbeing. Objection

and traffic

road to

Brodie Edinburgh attended

used .vhh

block

would

the unacceptable.

homes

planning

diverting of Bank

numbers

2015 play

the INTERNAL

Rebecca company

reasons will

moved and

main the

Winchburgh by

through

and even

road

revised

submit

have

Any

the

of to village 15:45 instead

a in

route the

a local

E112 planning

the notice

if Scotland traffic into under

entire,

that

in (Controls,

revision

daily

were a

built

what

surrounding

the

that far plan ONLY

area The

and

council

the

Into

divert

2YB

basis. I

request the greater

through 0287/M$C/15

region would

present.

wish

extended

initial

has

the

new

—

notice

Edinburgh

pie, now

original, which Christie, 01 McCarriston,

FW:

CPB

all

the

still

meeting been

large

However to

Barratt

June

still

plan traffic

detriment Registered that

Objection

my formally

area. 0287/MSC/15

infrastructure Services)

They

far

200-300

residential

will

village

drawn be

number

2015 street

provided approved Linda

too permission

City,

further at through

development only

attempted

NN:

have

much which

Wendy

lodge

— 08:11

It to

cars to

was

increase

revisions

which

will

area. as my

planning

behalf

from serious the

houses

masterpian.

the

traffic

Scotland NN

making deemed

representatives plan my

quality

result

changes

runs

not

street

objections

their It

the

or if in of

advise

to will

reservations

that

this

granted

Winchburgh notice

to Planning scaling use

main

the

of to

direct

houses

No.

In then

well

revised

residents have necessary be

life

of The

which that

masterplan

route

0287/MSC/15

90312. h street. the acceptable.

back

In through

in not for

from proposed

been

the than

excess the Winchburgh

these I

plan

about provide

into

live,

of immediately

traffic

near

above

both

mine.

and

Registered

the

infrastructure Broxbrun

indeed for

changes

residential Even

the

approved

revised

will I

West proposed

200-330

volumes the

completely

noted Wlnchburgh. I NN

Devon

contend estimated

than

necessary

right

this Lothian

adjacent

built.

fINTERNAL

and plan

Office:

planning

the

lake cars. with

the

were

area

number road

past

that the

seeks

While refute original

masterplan. number,

opposing

Council

the

support

where

infrastructure

sufficiently network

surrounding to

the

notice.

addition

ONLY)

block

was

the door.

this St

proposed

plans

remove

many and

Andrew

given

the

proposed to

the

assumption.

3 risks

This

and

the

will

building low of

IiL/s

plans

children

area the

the

is more

the

have

road for

and

site

A of

: To: Subject: Sent: From: McCorriston,

The DATA This Comment Winchburgh From:

considerations should Access access for Alan decided increased Farm West

PROTECT: CLASSIFIED: INTERNAL PUBLIC: http://webwestl.

Link

SAVE

local

Glendevon

indicates

Russell

Road

Lothian

LABEL:

)nformation onto

Subject:

use

All

access

PRIVATE/CONFIDENTIAL

PAPER

Block ONLY:

traffic from

information

the

Contains

the

1/6/15 EH52

the

that

INTERNAL

Council Alan

basis Glendevon Farm and

Contains Linlithgow

app.

Wendy

through

Planning access -

could

traffic

6PX

vehicles Handling

Please

maintain

information

westlothian.pov.uk/its/policies/itsecurity/WLC%2Olnformation%2OHar,rJIing%2oprocedure.pdf

Russell,

Road

has

the

road -

information

flow,

their

do been

Data

Application

ONLY

from Residents’ Road distributor

from

Procedure:

future

not

Chairman,

stopped the

this

streets

approved

that

Labels:

the

for

Block -

safety

McCorriston,

FW: McCorriston,

Contains

detailed

could

for

vehicles

west

August

subject 0287/MSC/15

Association this

short and

Planning

road J

council

Glendevon

would of for

have

e-mail distributor

there

the

Personal

public planning

which

2015

to from

staff

the

numerous

use

Wendy Wendy

HMG Application

reduced

unless

would

disclosure

wish

12:50 already

Blocks

farm

the

only

Farm

Classifications applications

road.

Block

Business

existing

absolutely

road.

local

J, Road

walkers

object

has

Emergency

0287/MSC/15 H ,

and

That need

Sensitive

road

approved Winchburgh

Residents’

streets

necessary. for

and I.

would

for or

the The

‘Restricted’

those

street

cyclists

through

vehicle

Information a

outline

residents

outline

street

Association. :

help

Block

blocks.

status.

that

access

keep

and

planning

Block

planning

of ,

for

road

use

above Winchburgh

This

the

Block

authorised K. to

the

crossing

farm

Blocks

application

arrangement

Glendevon

permission.

road

feel

would

road

as personnel

that -

the

[INTERNAL

and not

0287/MSC/15.

recreation Cottages,

these

Glendevon

With

would

have

quiet

only

could

vehicles

recent

route

allow ONLY)

route.

be We The to Although indicative shown Block access There Distributor (The A Block additional advice process houses most distributor give access for eliminating Alan We passing Chairman, If a previous Block the wish temporary feel residents the residents Russell houses Comments J H is for on access but to will accessing (from very through of H. access an to the the our Block Block vehicular road Road both Glendevon option object no the Discussions only emergency indicative strongly have option of Block rights conclusion road and have extra but to limit J2 H the meeting was block and to was the and Block a Glendevon development would stopping is routes and G) Glendevon a the maintenance of traffic the agreed that Objections required Linlithgow right to K Farm I. plans using across vehicle have increase — responsibilities other H. with bring has remove decisions then through in of This short Road as for this the been Transport access been options the Farm for a only that Farm unnecessary the would Site of local road to outline area in options construction of responsibility farm Residents’ the held Blocks 28 reached Outline the route route outline on Road the J, both Road via road, for to May2015 existing also Block Winchburgh road. number with regarding Services farm planning provide the access could envisaged for H Residents’ north Planning planning following were give at the and access streets J but track. Association this vehicles at Block for be houses and developers vehicular construction would I to to pleased application this roads at enhanced point the This H. discuss application through south Application in to a the K Association stage future In road). Block Blocks streets. to for not crossing as would line particular, when access access on Block wish the should options on or J of date. K, to the and H but allow the residents the indicated the no show local 0287/MSC/1 vehicular and Jas the farm to Block vehicular the consideration matter not Glendevon main building and the vehicular farm well road I the increase in road limit J J getting due are Glendevon otherwise. traffic — as Blocks, of access status road. to options access and the Block 5 in course. avoid the in from legal to is to H Thanks To: Sent: Subject Corn To: Dunlevle, -——Original DATA From: Subject: Sent: From:

Hi 1 The due attached application 2.

I is 1. 3.

West Deryck Leeann Sent

CLASSIFIED: PROTECT: only

Link PUBliC: P

hear

proposed. SAVE

The There

bought McCorriston,

to reasons

therefore

to 1,

from INTERNAL

LABEL

Lothian

by Leeann

notice

the

Barnes

Information Jacove

PAPER

Objection

May2015 All are

object

local)

my PRIVATE/CONFIDENTIAL

gas

goes

information Message—---

show

Dorothy

several are

Contains

INTERNAL

Jacovelli

Council

iPhone

lii

mains.

house - strongly

ONLY:

and

the

Please

ahead.

Wendy

the

for

22:39

planning

scan/redact Handling children

plot -

information proposed

planning Contains

proposed

do Data

ONLY

against

has

not

been

Labels:

including

block

application

Procedure: print

any Winchburgh

information

plan

planning

approved

22 PEoSupportServices FW: McCorriston,

that

k -

approval

this

under

Contains

was June

Objection

send

subject Pci&

all

application

2015

own

the

for

blacked

Personal

unless Wendy

who understanding

public

12:58 council this

for

our

HMS

proposed planning A\GJ

play

out

home

for

absolutely

disclosure staff

and

the

Classifications

Business 1

the was

only

in variation

Winchburgh

application

that

Street

necessary.

wayreadable rio

Sensitive

way

and

houses

black

I informative

Restricted#

0287/MSC/15

fear

Information

would

for

the

their

way

and

Winchburgh

build

safety

clear

for to

above [INTERNAL

understand

authorised

front

the

this

master

drawing

planning

ONLY]

our

what

personnel

plan.

house

exactly

N Dunn, Maureen

From: Planning Sent: 17 May2015 20:41 To: McCorriston,Wendy Subject: Comments for Planning Application LIVE/0287/MSC/15

Planning Application comments have been made. A summary of the comments is provided below.

Comments were submitted at 8:41 PM on 17 May 2015 from Mr Kevin Thornley. Application Summary Address; Block 3, Winchburgh Approval of matters specified in conditions of plannIng Proposal: permission 1012/P/OS for revised masterplan to reflect variation of Block J boundary (grid ref. 308098 674911) Case Officer: Wendy McCorriston Click for further information

Customer Details Name: Mr Kevin Thornley Email: Address: 12 River Gore Road Gorebridge

Comments Details Commenter Neighbour Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Application Reasons for comment: Comments: I strongly object to the proposal for Block 3. The increased traffic in Church Hill Brae would be a problem as the road was not designed for the amount of traffic that would be generated if houses were to be built In Block 3. The access road would become a rat run, with danger for children and residents here alike. Increased fumes from traffic could cause health problems and as the road would cross a gas pipe there is the potential for a real disaster if damage was caused to the pipe. Heavy traffic connected to house building would also cross the pipe line. The loss of green space between Church View and Tippet Knowes would be awful. Wildlife would be chased away as habitat was destroyed and the character of the area affected as less and less green spaces survive. The area already has lots of buildings going up and it is important to retain pockets of green as refuges for wildlife in an increasing urbanised landscape. The area needs to retain its trees and grass covered spaces.

1 a’(3,13

Dunn, Maureen

From: Planning Sent: 17 May2015 15:18 To: McCorriston,Wendy Subject Comments for Planning ApplicationLIVE/0287/MSC/15

Planning Application comments have been made. A summary of the comments is provided below.

Comments were submitted at 3:17 PM on 17 May 2015 from Mr Alan Brown. Application Summary Address: BlockJ, Winchburgh Approval of matters specified in conditions of planning Proposal: permission 1012/Pf05 for revised masterplan to reflect variation of Block J boundary (grid ref. 308098 674911) Case Officer: Wendy McCorriston Click for further information

Customer Details Name: Mr Alan Brown Email: Address: 51 Church View, Wlnchburgh EHS2 GSZ

Comments Details Commenter Neighbour Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Application Reasons for comment: Comments: I strongly object to the proposal for block J for the following reasons The removal of the existing possible road (Glendevon Link Road?) with access through Block K brings Into play the dangerous problem of putting a carriage way over an existing gas main in a built up area. As there is a safer way without this, using the existing proposed road, this proposal should not be accepted. As there Is no detail of the number of properties being built it is not possible to conclude the traffic flow but it can be assumed that the number of properties will increase and the access to these should not be through Block K which has only sufficient roads for the present estates. There is the possibility of Emergency access through to block H. How would this built to ensure that it could only be used In Emergency as we do not want additional Fr’n#Ir c.....n C i_i nnA 7 I inn,, klnrl, 1/ aeti erncc i Sill i ‘(‘Jill 4_i, II 44 444 & Si.Jl I l.ii%’i4 % 44.Je 4111n ‘44_i7 41 route. Alternatively put in two access roads which would do away with access required through K Not sufficient consideration has been given to

I Construction traffic access; this cannot be through block K especially due to the number of children on the estate. Finally the proposed new development will destroy one of the very few green spaces available to encourage wildlife In this area and the application should be dismissed on this criterion alone.

2 Subject To: Sent

Application Comments Dunn, Planning From: Address

Case Address Ciick Proposal: Customer

Name: Email: Stance Type: Commenter Comments Comments: comment:

Reasons

for

Officer:

Maureen

further

Application

for

were

Details

Mrs

Details 51 Approval variation

permission Block Wendy

Summary

I Customer Neighbour the that The danger traffic fumes as increased to as already affected a Block).

increasing pipe its Knowes

information

submitted

strongly

real

Church

the retain

habitat

Janet

trees

road

comments loss

would

line.

disaster

connected

McCorriston

ftom

road

Winchburgh

for

The

has

would of of

and

would

Brown

pockets

View

traffic objects

object

was 1012/P/05

urbanised

children

Block matters be

green

less

was

traffic

lots

access

grass

Comments 1:17 11 McCorriston, Planning

generated

If be

destroyed

Winchburgh

have cross

and

of not

May2OlS

damage

space

awful.

couid

boundary

Church

buildings

covered

specified

the and

road

house

green

designed

less the

been

landscape.

for

gas

proposai

for

residents

between

cause

Planning Wildlife

green wouid

was revised

Wendy

and

13:18

building made

Hill

houses Planning

pipe

spaces.

going

(grid

May refuges

caused for the

Brae

health

spaces

conditions

become

there

The

would

for

masterplan

Church

the A

Application

here

character

2015

ref.

were

Application

would 1

summary

wouid

Block

area

amount

for to

problems

and

308098

survive.

alike.

from a

the

wildlife

View

also

rat

needs

chased of

pipe.

The is

potential

Increased

planning

Mrs

run,

UVE/O287/MSC/15

built

and cross

the

important 674911)

The

probiem

and

reflect

traffic

the

Janet

Heavy

away

with

area

Tippet

an in

retain

area

the

comments

for

Brown.

provided

below

fs/i

S To:

Subject From Dunn, Sent:

Application

Comments

Planning Address:

Click Case Proposal Customer Address: Name Email

Commenter Comments Type: comment: Stance:

Comments: Reasons

for

Officer:

Maureen

further

Application

for

were

Details

Approval Mr variation Block 53 Wendy permission Details

Summary

Customer Neighbour We the children dangerous. -Like because day. -Access limited Block existing and It additional -The the -The houses information

proposed. In

submitted

Craig

Church

plain

strongly countryside,

notice

comments

the

hard J,

Increased

planning Masterplan

many

McCorriston

Winchburgh

are

McLachlan

and

not English. streets

of of

and

residents

View,

the

objects

traffic.

1012/P/05

The

was

Block matters at

the

not of The

suitable.

children object see

the

Comments Planning 17 2:21 McCorriston,

Masterplan

our

notice

number

open clear

have

traffic

being

of Wirichburgh

proposed

May

why

green

J already natural

but neighbours, Block

boundary

specified

the

and outlook. 2015

been

play

There does

for

built

rather

the

space

for

Planning habitat

provides

easily these

revised

Wendy

and

14:21

17 access objections

following

made.

are

not

Planning

houses

are

EH52

(grid

the

for

May

the

is Green

when

clearly unsuitable

roads

conditions

understandable.

many

very

streets

masterplan

best would A

ApplIcation

2015

for

ref.

developers

bought

6SZ

are wildlife. Application

summary

buIlding grounds:

space

would

important

would

over

explain

families

interests

308098

required.

from

create

for

our

3000 Is

all

planning

the already

LIVE/0287/MSC/15 of

what

Interests.

house

times

town living

greater

674911)

for

reflect

the

Craig

The

houses.

rat

the

comments

run of in

not

McLachlan.

provided

below.

/s/Ls Sent: Dunn, Subject To: Address: Comments From:

Application Planning

Case Address: Click Proposal: Customer Name: comment: Commenter

Stance: Comments Email: Reasons Comments: for

Officer:

Maureen further Application for were

Details 74 Ms Approval variation

Details Wendy Block permission

Summary Neighbour set-up their We vehicles, amenities green that Customer

complete traffic reduce houses having particular, housing impact information submitted Church Ann object comments It 3,, long volume belt will McCorriston & is greatly a very WInch built development of of and such home Madge disaster View objects term already. to severely children area 1012/P/05 Block matters at heavily in this the burgh 9:54 Comments Planning 11 McCorriston, on that the this Winchburgh in ‘home’ have beyond MacDonald/Spence May general a block such to to ability boundary there in road particular impact PM specified on the the 2015 been the block for thus a on the J our for Planning not area. development beautiful is of revised health neighbourhood. Wendy 21:55 11 made. in utter enough Planning J general taking West wildlife at (grid In a proposed part May There all way conditIons & beauty masterplari Lothian Application A designed of 2015 area.

ref.

safety away Application strain I habitats summary housing that Winchburgh are on 308098 would from Ascetically, of the will already of the on It of the for all will area making appeal increase all planning to Ms grounds be of LIVE/0287/MSC/15 bit 674911) people, heavy

reflect also the Ann a enough and and of of the comments it & the In Madge

Aa Macoonald/Spence. Is provided below. to: COM Subject From: Sent Dunn. -----Original To: Sent: DATA Subject: From: with few Construction young Good We Harry proposed Council. Gloria attend. only CLASSIFIED: West Winchburgh 38 Link PROTECT: Regards http://webwestl.a PUBLIC: P EHS26SZ SAVE Church McCorriston, are weeks. to us INTERNAL 1. 27 LABEL: Lothian and Morning Gloria and families (0, Information PAPER as away

Maureen All Planning May road I PRIVATE/CONFIDENTIAL being View Local) Harry wish information Are Message----- Contains Gibson INTERNAL Traffic on 2015 Council - who Wendy and ONLY: the Please the to holiday Gibson Wendy by Application 07:33 pp.westlothian.gov,uk/its/policies/ftsecurity/WLC%2Olnformatipn%2oHandhng%2QProcedure.odf object diverting estate have Handling email and route

I information - Contains do Data ONLY has from will moved - to not roads into then been Labels: It the all Procedure: 0287/MSC/15 8th print fall Plot information Construction constructed following redact/scan here. approved to 28 FW: PEDSupportServices McCorriston, to that - .1 hse-mail this Contains 29th the when May Planning Although is residents subject June 2015 application we for for Traffic please to Personal purchased unless 2015 Wendy public council Application 12:23 a the to standard to HMG road through but maintain absolutely disclosure on staff or would Classifications exit Health our Business I. that 0287/MSC/15 only the has properties. them, like will necessary. and New always Sensitive our cope Safety or Barratt views of will been with This * ‘Restricted’ [INTERNAL Grounds they Information Estate noted has the on be the only length in adopted will as plans, and ONLY] any come doing create for and above future it authorised to immediately weight away was a light danger meetings never with over of all personnel

i1iS7o2- to the discussed the by

ic we all C..i the last the can’t

/s/is / To Dunn,

Subject Sent: From:

Application Comments

Planning

Address:

Case

Proposal:

Customer Click

Name:

Address: Email:

Type: Commenter Comments comment: Stance:

Comments: Reasons

for

Officer:

Maureen

further Application

for

were

Details

Approval

BlockJ, 44 variation Mr

permission Wendy

Details

Summary

Customer

N I traffic,

will moment of cars. information

I narrow children would

submitted

eig

would

Robert

Church

Block

cause

comments

This,

McCorriston

our

Winchburgh

running

roads

object

also of of

who

Fiannigan

View

objects

taiibacks

1012/P/05

and

at coupled matters Block)

already

great

Planning play Comments

McCornston, 3:35

and

Winchburgh

Block have

through

May

the

risk

parking In

boundary

specified having

with

bring

the 2015

the been

current

for

rush on

for

Block the

them.

streets, Planning

revised

Wendy

15:35

made.

Issues

traffic

Planning

hour

main

a (grid

May

plan

safety

conditions

This

times

the

masterplan

issues arising A

Application

2015

road

ref.

due

Application

summary

increased

issue

estate

308098

due as

from

due

from

the

due

planning

increase

UVE/0287/MSC/15 of

only

too

the

674911)

the

the traffic

reflect

the

Robert

many

layout the

exit

small,

comments

Flannigan.

Aan

provided

below.

/s/s

kC I • ‘

Sent To:

Dunevie, Subject: From:

Thanks Scan/redact DATA

Please

—-Original Sent: To: From:

Subject:

Wendy Chruch I

Main amount Also possibly away

Jonathan nothing My proposed 68 Winchbu This Kind the EH52

Neither

For please

Chruch

McCorristan,

wife

address transmission

writing

that

transmission

28 Regards

LABEL:

reason

seems

6SZ

Brown,

COM

View visit

May Reference could

travel Tata

rgh

particular

Brown

development

View kids

Dorothy Message--

1 stay

http://www.tatasteeleurope.com/entities

and

INTERNAL like for

2015

Steel Jonathan

(0,

you

daily

Tippet

that

the

@ Wendy

company

Local)

built

crazy

18:03

no to Europe

plot

play past objection

confidential

anyone.

advise

0287/is

Knowe.

Chruch on

ONLY

idea.

that

meant

Umited land registration

the

household. that

View

would

land

street

proposed

and

01 I McCorriston,

FW [INTERNAL PEDSupportServices

already

would

nor

due

and

take

June

must

Reference

any

details

the risk.

place.

house

appose

2015

busy

the

not

bought

fact

Also ONLYI

its

gas

Wendy

with

10:03

development

the subsidiaries

certain

the

all

used

mains

were the

0287/IS

dog

influx

the

%ac

proposed

house

entities

walkers

extra

pipe.

advised

disclosed

proposed

can

new

hassle

housing

Winchburgh within

and

the

when

0o”S

traffic

basis &

house

anyone

another the

enquiring

problems

development

any

which

that

Tata

responsibility

development

other

would

area

Steel

caused

into

look

than where

Europe in

put

that

out

Winchburgh

the

for

particular

on the

the

Winchburgh

group

any

ever

intended

47,

O$ the

kids

site

use

expanding field

traffic

play

plot

between

)7c

companies,

L-rnit

recipient.

where

misuse

that -

having

taking

the

it — F

Dunn, Maureen 4c1c £bjSllS From Planning Sent 22 May 2015 16:02 To: Mccorriston, Wendy Subject: Comments for Planning Application UVE/0287/MSc/15

Planning Application comments have been made. A summary of the comments is provided below.

Comments were submitted at 4:02 PM on 22 May 2015 from Mr Craig Hutchison. Application Summary Address: Block 3, Winchburgh Approval of matters specified in conditions of planning Proposal’ permission 1012/P/OS for revised masterplan to reflect variation of Block) boundary (grid ref. 30808 674911) case Officer: Wendy McCorriston Click for further information

Customer Details Name: Mr Craig Hutchison Email Address: 47 Church View Winchburgh ctta (0S

Comments Details Commenter Neighbour Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Application Reasons for comment: Comments: I am writing to object to the alterations of the original plan, which will reduce the amount of greenspace available in the viiiage and will lead to the roads from Church View being used as access, increasing noise and reducing safety for our small residentiai street. We understood when buying our property that the greenspace was to be retained? which Informed our decision to locate to the village Building properties wiii impede our view and impact detrimentally on the safety and quiet of our street.

I would appreciate reconsideration.

Yours sincerely,

Craig i-lutchison and Kevin McPhee McCorriston, Wendy

From: McCorriston, Wendy Sent: 04 August 2015 14:51 To: McCorriston, Wendy Subject: FW:Winchburgh Planning Application - BlockJ

From: Craig Hutchison Sent: 13 July 2015 12:40 Subject: Winchburgh Planning Application - BlockJ

Dear Wendy, 2rd I attended the recent consultation meeting regarding proposed changes to Blocki in Winchburgh (Thursday July), which gave me the opportunity to review the revised plan in advance of it being submitted to the planning committee. I have previously written to you regarding my objections to the changes in Blocki, and have followed this up with additional information by email. Followingthe consultation meeting I have a number of concerns which

Iwould like to register. I am copying my local councillors in and consequently will include some additional background information. Apologies for the consequent length of this email.

My partner and myself are new residents, having bought a detached home in BlockKwhich faces onto the proposed new development. When we purchased our property we were specifically and categorically told by the Barratt’s representative that “nothing can be built in front of you because of the gas main” and that there would only be a landscaped area in front of our houses, although “maybe” there would be a road going in on the far side, near Tippetknowes, to give access to the new homes in Blocki, but the landscaping would be in front of this. I know that several of my neighbours were similarly told this. Iattach the plan of the site which we were given by Barratts, indicating the site of the original road. Ialso consulted the masterplan for the Winchburgh Village development which showed an area of landscaping in front of our houses, and Blocki at the bottom of the plan, accessed by the proposed road (also attached). When we bought our property we therefore understood from Barratts and from the development plan that we were moving into a quiet development and that there would be landscaped space in front of us and, potentially, an access road in the distance between the main road and BlockJ.

The development company has since requested significant expansion of housebuilding capacity on Blocki, facilitated by removal of the original access road. We understand that this new proposal means there is no direct access for Blockito the main road, except through our development (BlockK).There is avery significant increase in the number of houses planned for BlockJ, and consequently a significant increase in traffic coming through our development, which was originally intended to be a quiet neighbourhood. BlockKhas attracted a number of young families and one of the great features of the area is that children are free to play outside on what are currently quiet nd neighbourhood streets. The development company told me at the consultation on the 2 iuly that they had undertaken traffic modelling on their new proposal, and that the traffic from the new BlockI coming through our streets would be within acceptable limits but pretty much at the capacity of what is permitted. This raises several objections and concerns: apart from the fact that this is not what myself and my neighbours had understood when we had bought our properties, there are concerns about the increased residential and construction traffic coming through our streets, increasing dangers to children playing in the area and detracting significantly from the quiet

residential nature of our Block.I noted while at the consultation that there is also a connecting street through from the new Stewart Milne development next door to our Blockand when Iasked what would stop people from Stewart

Milne using our Blockas a ratrun to access the main road Iwas told ‘nothing’. This means that there is potential for even more traffic to access the main road through BlockK,increasing both safety concerns and further detracting

from the quiet residential nature of our Block. I know that many of my neighbours are extremely unhappy about the proposals, with some families with young children livingright next to what will be the only access to BlockJ, making their road a busy throughway rather than a quiet residential area. This is extremely disappointing and not what we had been given to understand. We understand the development company is proposing a temporary road for construction traffic, on the site of the originally planned access road, to reduce the impact of construction traffic

1 coming through our Block,but this will not address the issue of significantly increased residential traffic, noise, and safety concerns. In addition, the pedestrian path which runs in front of our house between blocks J and Kand which is regularly and well-used by dog-walkers, playing children and others will now be crossed at the bottom by the sole access road to block J, making it less safe for children.

The original plan was for a much smaller BlockJ with its own access to the main road. This is what I had understood and I believe that the new proposals are severely problematic, reducing the amount of pleasant public greenspace in the area and replacing it with a heavily built-up environment and turning BlockKfrom a quiet residential area into a thoroughfare, with an attendant increase in traffic safety concerns and noise. Consequently I hope that the planning committee will reject the new revised proposal as unacceptable and retain the original plan for a smaller BlockJ accessed by its own road. Our concerns have also been raised with the residents association and the community council. Iwould note that Block Kis still being completed and is not yet fully occupied, but a very large number of objections have been received regarding the proposed changes to BlockJ which means that the majority of BlockK’s current residents is opposed to the changes.

Iwould appreciate your attention to this matter.

Yours sincerely,

Craig Hutchison 47 Church View Winchburgh West Lothian EH426SZ

2 To: Sent Prom: Dunn, Subject Address: Comments Application

Planning

Case

Click Proposal Address Customer

Name Email: Stance:

Comments Commenter

comment: Reasons

comments:

for

Officer:

Maureen

further

Application

for

were

Details

47 Approval

Mr variation permission Block

Wendy Details

Summary

Customer information

Neighbour

affect In thedisruption following. submitted lack Wlnchburgh sadly care space appreciation While these new result

Kevin ChurErView

addition

comments

and

been McCorriston

to our spaces

has

Winchburgh

clarity

through

McPhee of of

the local

old,

objects

cultural 1012/P/05

become Block matters

forgotten

ongoing

McCorristcn, 22 Comments Planning

11:05 to

the in

wildlife,

Winchburgh

undergoing

have

our

The May

use

encourage

the 3

these

to objections

boundary

interests

specified an

local

safety 2015 and

been

the Big

for

redevelopment

adopted

the

plans

for

this

Planning

enjoy

environment. revised

Wendy

23:05

made.

loss Planning

of public

community

are

process

(grid

in I

significant

made

our

would May

on space

conditions

seemingly

Gkcsa

masterplan

green

art

Application

neighborhood,

ref.

Application

2015

summary

daily

project and

for

regards

308098

the

spirit

change

space

from

to our

basis. this

being

ability

add

planning

to what

community,

and

UVE10287/MSC/15 of

green to

and

674911)

refiect as

the

taken

the

Kevin

has

the

comments

McPhee.

provided

tic

£1b1511S

below.

t6vc&j McCorriston, Wendy

From: McCorriston,Wendy Sent: 04 August2015 14:51 To: McCorriston,Wendy Subject: FW:AcolaidCase LIVE/0287/MSC/15- [INTERNALONLY]

From: KevinMcPhee Sent: 29 May 2015 23:59 To: McCorriston,Wendy Subject: RE:Acolaid Case LIVE/0287/MSC/15

In addition to my objection raised on Friday 22nd May 2015 I would like to add the following:

Winchburgh is at risk of losing all sense of rural identity with further amendments to the redevelopment plans.

I am aware that there has been community consultation at various stages throughout this process and with the arrival of new residents to the village we need further and continued consultation. This needs to happen again and soon.

Block J and the surrounding area is an opportunity not to build houses at all but to develop a green space which can be used by both new and existing residents of our village. It is currently used by many people and to lose this would be detrimental to how this growing community integrates organically and successfully.

Winchburgh is undergoing a public art strategy. In my opinion the community consolation component of this project is not effective and is not best serving the interests of the residents of this village. The involved artists need to better respond to the concerns of the residents and be involved in this discussion regarding Block J.

With the objections being raised against Block J this provides an opportunity for the developers, Dallas, Pierce and Quintero and West Lothian Council to respond to the community’ s concerns to loss of this greenspace and re—examinehow this land can best used to serve the people in the village. For example, this greenspace would be enhanced with the addition of a series of public art commissions by contemporary artists, very much like a mini—JupiterArtland (to my knowledge this site as not been considered at present). In doing so could create a multi—purpose cultural, social and green space that has been shaped by the concerns and needs of the village and its residents.

KevinMcPhee 47 Church View Winchburgh EH526SZ

9 ,i4,O

Dunlevie, Dorothy CVT mi!

From: McCorristan, Wendy Sent 01 June 2015 10:03 To: PEDSupportServices Subject FW:Objections for plot 1: 0287/MSC/15 [INTERNALONLYJ

DATALABEL:INTERNALONLY

P’ease corn 1 (0, Local)for above ref

Scan/redact please ; ‘ From; Laura Wales Seat: 28 May2015 15:34 To: McCorriston,Wendy Cc: Dave Wales Subject: Objections for plot)

Dear Wendy,

Following the meeting on Monday 25th May 2015 at Winehburgh Community Centre we would like to formally submit our objections regarding the proposed plans for housing on Plot J in the Winchburgh Developmentsite. Details of our objections are as follows.

(I) When we bought our property which looks out onto Plot .1,we were assured nothing would be built In front of the house (Plot J) and that we would have the country view. We were told by the Barratt sales advisor that there was a proposed plan for a road going parallel with the high pressure gas pipe but this would not go through therefore we would always have a nice view from our home.

Had we known about any plans to build houses on the land in front of our house, we would not have purchased the property. One of the main reasons we purchased our house was far the beautiful countryside views,

(2) The through4raffic is of great concern to us. There are many children already living on Church View and the way the street is now is very safe and there is no concern for a cMd’s safety in terms of traffic. We would have serious concerns If there was a through-road to housing from Church View.

This was also a major influencing factor to purchase our property was the fact that It was a quiet road and street i hich would be safe far children. We purchased our house with the view of bringing up a family in the near future and specifically wanted a quiet street like it is now

(3) We feel by building houses on Plot 4, it would not allow for a decent green area between the old and new Barratt houses. It would look toe built up and by almost joining the two estates, it would ruin the character of Winchburgh as a whole and the two housing estates.

Surely a better plan would be create a park area, not just a play park but one with walks as this would create a mutual area in the community, retain the charm of Wlnchbnrgh and promote health since many people go running or cycling.

(4)

1. All In all, getting rid of the view, creating a busier street with a through-road and making it less safe for children will decrease the value of the hc looking out onto Plot J. Alt the above were selling points and building houses on Plot J will destroy the favourable attributes many residents purchased their homes for.

We would also like to make a complaint about the way in which this matter was handled. We found out about these plans from a neighbour on Sunday th24 May2015, who went door-to-door asking the neighbours if they were going to the meeting at the Community Centre on Monday th25 May 2015. You can imagine our anger when it was a neighbour who told us about the plans. We did not receive rnything through the door to allow us to submit objections to the proposed plans, for which the deadline date was the previous Friday. It turns out that several other neighbours did not receive the notification either. Those who did receive notification felt that information was not properly disclosed due to the ‘black triangle” offering no details.

We saw the list of houses that the notification went to and our house was on the list but we can assure you that we did not receive it. For something like this, it is vital that residents receive the information. We are not at all convinced that any attempt was made to notify residents in each house which would be affected, Moreover, it seems that theseplans to build houses has been kept ‘ cry quiet in a deceitful manner. It is also suspicious that the meeting at the Community Centre was held on a bank holiday when some people may be away and at 5pm when most people would be working. \Ve were also not notified of the meeting — a leatlet should have gone round the houses. When we found out about the planning application, we found a link on the council website but strangely when we tried to open the link, the page was blank stating “Forbidden Access”.

We sincerely hope that objections from 44 out of the 53 occupied homes (as stated on Monday’s meeting) will have some influence — an.83% rate for objection is not to be taken lightly.

We would be grateful for acknowledgement of receipt of our objections.

Regards David and Laura Wales

49 Church View Winchburgh EH52 6SZ

West Lothian Council - Eata Labels:

PROTECt:PRIVATE/CONFIDENTIAl.- ContainsPersonal or BusinessSensitiveInformationfor autharised personnel only INTERNALONLYContains information for councilstaff only PUBLIC:Allinformation has been approved for publicdisclosure CLASSIFIED:Containsinformation that is subject to HMGClassificationsof ‘Restricted’and above

Linkto Information HandlingProcedure: http://webwestl aDp,westIathiangov, uk/its/øollcie/itsecurfty/WLC%2Otnformation%2O/1anWina%2Ocedureoq’f

.) SAVEPAPER - Please do not print this e-mailunless absolutely necessary.

4 •

2 To: Subject: To: Sent: Sent: changes Subject: From: From: McCorriston, ofor to being cancelled to My Dear constantly caused development recently offering Obviously the seriously the Many single directly. extremely concems also I Gordon I Kind obviously will be name construction streets. be aim Mrs regards decreasing McCorriston, this the of current damage contacted a been the 17 are It to Gordon put McCorrlston is main development. with and safe this angry having was vehemently attend Gordon residents, correct, May Proposed that when informed (and objections is access and access only traffic to and extremely as Into to or the the 2015 secure future) access Keogh the because be h creation the disappointed doubt now Wendy n has including mono to Wendy of object iiatto vigilant site Are obviously site changes Winchburgh resident place 22:03 finished coming was alarming and cofljmj.glity and nears these blocked one J, to I blocked I ourselves are the for live am of make of completion. that assumptions via to resulting of for a our proposed our likely to - with assuming area the the you’d new the the meeting my I children sure from was neighbours planned Church my to entrance day family road as of Road prefer in destroy not our wife h road the the 04 lye McCorriston, FW: McCorriston, changes or a We that at between correct? to change Informed son B9080 and at Hill August already and Winchburgh road to Change play do Proposed this to the had any call doesnt Brae myself. and Church young not infrastructure weekend. and and road and to been me. community Church mentioned, of expect even development the 2015 grow I the with will get son would Concerns Our View sent deadline Community Wendy Wendy last proposed outside be Winchburgh View at all it up. This house details to 14:51 and appreciate supporting 1 week the we modifications have be Church Children and is you hoped had heavy using should our increasing! sits the one of changes Tlppetknowes Centre young have garden. the on type View the of machinery if have access be the changes you these children currently existing Road to of informed urudn our surrounding in to by entrance started environment discuss could We Winchburgh, build yourself for vehicles have passing n thought and and Change all road and tell set due of playing of this to traffic these me already of purchased andlor which the to damaged Church in 1 through I the how currently want necessary development. more on now June changes Concerns navigates sheer your this had the I View can to passing detail 2015 our a and is streets to department help sign Barratts volume make something and suffer and property machinery connecting but I through build right believe. by we given within If these until changes of my our Church are for outside traffic on especially understanding I then appropriate our house the my would objections and fully the development development. son. development Hill I to I construction our basis expecting expect look and want access Brae back when These forward back of formal? time to to development. the of gate. to know. site they be the new garden. h proposed the oput to our development especially vehicles passing to Based J volume I affect We proposals has own reply. am I forward believe are also This been on us required through of I wtien I this can so have traffic has their every McCorriston, Wendy

From: McCorriston, Wendy Sent: 04 August 2015 14:51 To: McCorriston, Wendy Subject: FW:FW:Planning Application 0287/MSC/15 : BlockJ , Winchburgh - [INTERNAL ONLVI

From: Sent: 15 May 2015 17:01 C0 To: McCorriston,Wendy Subject: Re: FW: Planning Application 0287/MSC/15 : BlockJ , Winchburgh 0

Dear Ms McCorriston, thank you for your prompt response to my questions on the above planning application.

the I remain concerned over the volume of traffic that will use the existing entrance to the Barratt’s site after proposed expansion of BlockJ and the completion of the houses adjacent to block Kon the Stuart Milne site and at the Steadings. The map on your enclosure to the e-mail below appears to show that because of the tortuous route to the entrance to the Miller site, it is the Barratt entrance that will be predominantly used both during construction and after completion.

Apart from potential safety issues within the residential area this will result in exceptional wear at that point. As the council have lost the cost of upkeep on the link road and will be gaining more income from Council Tax it would seem a matter of import that the roads along the access route are adopted for upkeep by West Lothian council.

It is understood that the volume of traffic and the winding and congested roads within the residential area could necessitate an Emergency Access between BlockJ and BlocksG and H but the “Emergeny Only access across the proposed bridge will required to be strictly enforced if it is not to add to the traffic problem within Block K.Ifa quicker short cut is available it is human nature to try and take it!

Thak you for your efforts Regards Nicolas Knox

Mr Knox

Further to your recent email regarding the above, the developer has set out replies to your points in the attachment. For information, where it refers to the council agreeing to the removal of the link road, what was agreed was that the road could be downgraded from a “distributo’ road to a “local” road . No new line of such a road was agreed and this is something that has now to be considered as part of this current application.

The key issue is that Block K, which is being developed by Millers and Barrett, was shown as being suitable for up to 214 houses in the master plan and Block] for 27 houses (241 total). t was always planned that there would be a ink from the Millers site (a road end has been left) towards BiockJ — but at the time of the Master plan the two ihJLT kJ U UU ULUI JØL1 JCC.

Block Kis actually being developed for 182 houses, so this application is essentially for in the region of 60 houses over BlockJi and BlockJ2 to take the total number of the two blocks back up to the circa 240. The traffic impacts wiflbe reviewed by Transportation (Chris Nicol) as part of the assessment of the planning application.

1 Wendy touch. Regards f you have McCorriston any further comments, or wish to put in a formal 8 representation, please do not hesitate to get back in To: Sent: McCorriston, Subject: From:

To:

Subject: Sent: From: Dear

application:

Devon

suitability my the On

process.

Yours

Nicolas

1. 4.

Thank

McCorriston,

a straight

front

Where confirmation

Has

Does

Ms Can

“my 01

tafflc

faithfully

Burn

Knox May

McCorriston, Planning

the

room,

the

you

back

look

the

approach will

through

Master 2015

those present

very

changed

Wendy

forward

Wendy

yard”

paticularly

the

be Application

of 10:08

much

streets

traffic

displaced

Plan

junctions our

block

to point

Master

the

telephone

for

been

for

hearing

that

“J”

sharp 0287/MSC/15

your

the

icy

through

Plan

fully

from for

McCorriston,

McCorriston, was FW:

concerned

volume

conditions.

bend August

help

instance?

the

conversation Planning

show

updated

block

have result

the

during

2015

the

front

residential

“K”

Wendy

that

used

Application

traffic

access

our 14:51

accommodate

your

show

the

telephone have the

been

to investigations

road

where

streets

eastern

property,

1 0287/MSC/15

blocks

the

assessed?

through

following

traffic

call of

branch

increased

“H”

block

and

section

and

Church

into

of the

the

questions

“K”,

“G”?

this

Church

traffic

confidence

proposed

“J”

where

View,

planning

flow

there

View

about

displaced

children

will

Primary

onto

you

still

application.

becomes

the

result

gave

the

above

play,

to?

bridge

school

B9080?

vehicles

has

planning

“rat

across

will

the

run”

go?

the To: Subject: Sent: From: McCorriston,

Sent: To: Subject:

From: Tomasz

Hi I Sent Church

have

Wendy,

Original

McCorriston,

from

Tomasz

missed

View

Stabla

road

May

Message

2015

plotj

this

iPad

Stabla

Wendy

big

20:43

access

meeting.

road

McCorriston, McCorristori, FW:

against

August

road

plotj

road

2015

Wendy

which

access

15:04

has

road

not

been

the

plans

before.

this

regardingj

plot

I I

cmr

—[J

-Ic)

\Pv

_r3

-2J1

Dcac 1

LAkOJ

‘ouJ/c

S?c_

‘1

\AaA

ri:

;Jiw/Lazo

-YT’)

1::I?:x

7H9

c2:v7

-vD

‘r-1D

xuu

cr6fl

I I Address: Subject Application Sent: Address: To: Type: Comments Planning comment: Proposal: From: Click Case Dunn, Email: Customer Comments: Comments Stance: Commenter Reasons Name: for Officer: Maureen ftirther Application for were Details 7 Details Mr Wendy variation Approval Block permission The I to significant and traffic. with at traffic. the Neighbour approved. Customer having the of and Plots Block recreation, practicality Summary II Information submitted Church would i[ the Erling l like all this, family centre proposed mortar. It IVI4J increased comments J, K,M,J1 J will very These McCorriston a needs this Wlnchburgh like of Binns of Place dedicated the objects be streets of number 1012/P/05 wildlife few and matters Block at will to UII4 & substantially Winchburgh, originally streets its new Comments 5:04 McCorristori, 12 Planning strongly J2 Winchburgh traffic green for cause have own May J as to of development and of boundary those main fII.1L PM specified .... well the plot are flow 2015 children been road spaces congestion for cover n12 on proposed object for Planning i.. 4JL1IIJI not road K as reasons revised Wendy onto 17:05 this ..i....-’.. more as made. for Planning the designed (grid the that in May per for to In construction will the conditions proposed of dangerous the this design. whole masterplan issues “Plot Application alone, TMMasterPlan A will 2015 ref. leave “J2” only 1. Application summary estate. proposal. be o thIs for 308098 Ji” will area main from at It 1JV less Instead left new should It of peak for destroy and In plans in nearer space planning to Mr road of UVE/0287/MSC/15 purpose Block schools the addition 674911) It bricks through reflect times the Erllng of Is not to from for one not to J”. QI comments use be 14.1 Binns.

A. is provided zW below. Sent: To: Dunn,

From: Subject

Planning Comments Address: Application

Case ClIck!LfurU],JnfmtiQn Proposal:

Customer Address: Name: Type: Email:

Commenter Comments comment: Stance:

Comments: Reasons

Officer:

Maureen

Application

for

were

Details

Mrs Approval

Block variation Wendy permission 59 Details

Summary

Customer Neighbour

was I for for There areas move

than and the this but Traffic

the deed impact residents

submitted

moved

church

Cheryl

my green

the

strong

young

also comments

space

dog advised

further

unsafe

was

are

McCorriston

children

Wirichburgh

further

open

of of

walkers to

let

not

already

view

parkiand

objects

Monaghan so

1012/P/05

already beautiful.

children

matters benefit Block at

this

that

housing.

only

mines

many

aspect

22 Planntng Comments

McCorriston,

11:37

Winchburgh

believe

housing

have

housing

May

(and

the

would to

boundary

problem

young specified

playing

located

views the

2015 main

offers

been

green

area

brought

for

general

issues

would

for

estate on

Planning ;pr

revised

Wendy

11:37

children

factor

be in made.

Planning of

here open

(grid

question in

with

the

fantastic

that

much hope

have,

walkers/Joggers)

May

from

our

conditions

for -

masterplan space in village

Application

ref. drainage

area

Application ,

street

summary 2015

the

more me Plus babies

Glasgow

flooding

village

was

308098

for

for council

agreeing

and

from the

and

to the of

nicely.

being

the

the setting.

surrounding

planning

safety

LIVE/0287/MSC/15

buggies

children

water I

Mrs

674911)

village

can

worry reflect

using

the

wished

village

retained

Cheryl

see

comments

the

all

Monaghan.

,42C1(

provided

s/4

below. properties is a huge rush also

Overall I strongly object to these changes

2 Subject Sent To:

Comments Dunn, Planning From: Application Address

Case

Address Click Proposal: Email: Customer Name: Stance Commenter Type: Comments Comments: comment:

Reasons

for

Officer:

Maureen

further

Application

for

were

Details

Mr 102 variation Details Approval Block), permission Wendy

Summary

Customer Other

It these

housing of plan proposals Winchburgh

information

submitted

peter is

their

n,idhope

with

comments

for

safety

McCorriston

Winchburgh

access

nisbet

some

quite

of of

regret

to objects

1012)P/05

Block)

matters

at ,

place the

issues,

the

20 Comments

Planning McCorriston, rightly

12:34

very

road

have

May

Master

find

residents

wlnchburgh

boundary

reasonable

specified

plus

the

2015

do been

for

objection

reach

for

pian on

not

Planning

revised

Wendy

12:33

made

Planning

wish

(grid

for in

Biock

the

May

safety broxburn

ioss

conditions

development

masterplan

this

Application

existing

ref.

the

Application

2015 of

summary 1

which

issues, variation

countryside

variation 308098

from

Barrett

would

planning

L1VE10287/MSC/15

674911)

reflect

the the

create

master peter

areas.

comments use

nisbet.

provided

below To: Sent: Dunn, Subject: From:

Comments Planning

Application

Address:

Proposal: Case cli

Customer

Address: Name: Email:

Comments Type: Commantar Stance: comment: Reasons Comments:

ckJ

Officer:

Maureen

Application

ftirtheifrti.n

for

were

Details

Approval

variation Block

permission Wendy Mrs 40

Details Summary

Other Customer

changes barrets and - and Government

lays what properties estate. beautiful

space neighbouring - n. mums

building avontoun

with

this

Diane

comments

Not

safer green

an prospective

little McCorriston

land

Winchburgh

the

for

dog

development

of of

to obl;gatton

Cartwright

village

objects 10121P/05 and on

dog matters at Block

current mention

space

green already

the

park here

Planning Comments 22 McCorriston, strategic

10:57

the

frequent

pet

stronger

walkers, have

master

May

several Linlithgow into buyer

land space is

boundary cats

master

specified

why

the In

2015

been

the

for

what .1

all

opposition

which

objectives

and strong for

plan.

and

breathtaking on

communities is children

the

Councils Planning

revised Wendy times

10:57

animal

made.

left Planning

plan

wiid)ife

West with

requirement

(grid

simply

objective ultimately May

earmarked conditions

allowing

and main

masterplan A

life week Family

Lothian

Application ref.

Application

2015 summary seen

Scotland

1 just

wth

families

views

healthier, 308098 objections

and

Scotland. living

for

daily. the

from

turning

another

rabbits,

for the

eradicate

3000

S planning

UVE/0287/MSC/1S

offers. Is to

public Mrs

Scottish 674911)

I proposed

reflect

the

have w&k achieve. greener the

are

housing lovely

This

Diane

comments

old

park

my fun

Cartwrlght.

provided

,25/5//5

below. ______

AaziIsAs 4k Dunn, Maureen

From: Planning Sent; 17 May2015 21:02 To: McCorriston,Wendy Subject: Comments for PlanningApplication UVEfO2B7JMSC/15

Planning Application comments have been made. A summary of the comments is provided below.

Comments were submitted at 9:02 PM on 17 May 2015 from Miss Rachaei Thomas. Application Summary Address: Block], Winchburgh Approval of matters specified In conditions of planning Proposal: permission 1012/P/OS for revised masterplan to reflect variation of Block) boundary (grid ref. 308098 674911) Case Officer; Wendy McCorrlston Click for furtherinformation

Customer Details Name: Miss Rachaei Thomas Email: Address: 51 Niven Road Inverkeithing

Comments Details Commenter Neighbour T e Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Application Reasons for comment: Comments: I object to the proposal for Block J.

As a new homeowner in a neighbouring site I’m deeply disappointed at the prospect of increased traffic In Church Hill Brae. This would cause increased noise pollution and danger to the children on the estate, ruining the quiet intentions of the development. The road running through church hill brae is far too enclosed by many houses to be used as an access road to further homes.

Biock J should have its own access road as to not impose on Church Hill Brae with increase noise and traffic.

For aN residents, especially dog waikers, the loss of nearby green spaces would be a significant loss. This would chase away local wildlife and again dent the intended idyilic design of the residentiai area.

1 4

To Sent From: Dunn, Subject

Application Comments Planning Address:

Case Proposal: Customer Address: Name: Email: Comments Stance:

Commenter comment: Comments: Reasons

Officer:

Maureen

Application

for

were

Details

______

Dr Approval

Wendy Block variation Details

permission

Summary

submitted

Customer Neighbour

I strongly development. preserved

Claire

Bennet

wish

comments

McCorriston

Winchburgh

McKechriie-Mason

of of

Wood

that

1012/P/05

object

matters Block at

objects

and

20 Comments Planning McCorriston,

7:33

the

have

Terrace

not

May

boundary

green

specified to

this

exploited

2015

been

for

the

for

Wlnchburgh

planning

spaces revised

Wendy

19:32

Planning

made.

Planning

(grid

May

for

conditions

masterplan

the

application.

2015

ref.

Application

the

Application

summary

purposes

308098

village

from

planning

L1VE10287/MSC/15

should

674911)

feel

reflect

the

Claire

comments

McKechnle-Mason.

provided

rL<

5/5/Ls

below.

A Subject Sent l’o: From: Dunn

Comments Application

Planning Address:

Click Case Proposal:

Customer Address: Emai’: Name: Commenter Comments Type: comment: Stance:

Comments: Reasons

far

Officer:

Maureen

further

Application

for

were

Details

Approval

Mr variation Block

Details 10 Wendy permission

Summary

information

submitted

Customer

Neighbour

spaces park not

Craig

Bennet

wish

comments

McCorriston

alone!

Winchburgh

McKechnie-Mason

of of

built

Wood

1012/P/OS

object

Block matters at

this

objects

upon, 20 Comments Planning

7:37 McCorriston,

have

village

Terrace

May

boundary

speafied to

Once

this

2015

been

for

the

on are

for

Winchburgh

planning

revIsed

Wendy

19:37

it’s

Planning

made.

very

Planning

(grid

gone May

conditions

precious

masterplan

application. 2015

ref.

Application

it’s

Application

summary

gone. 308098

from

and

Leave planning

this

LIVE/0287/MSC/1S

Green

674911)

reflect

the

Craig

should

our

comments

McKechnie-Mason.

provided

ki51/

below,

IIFI’

: Dunn, Sent To: Subject: From:

Application Comments Planning

Address:

Case Proposal:

Name: Address: Customer

Type: Comments Email: Stance: Commenter Comments: comment:

Reasons

Officer:

Maureen

Application

fw1JirJnformit1Qn

for

were

Details

Approval

Mr 8lock

Wendy variation

59 permission

Details

Summary

Customer Neighbour

View. I

outrageous advised moved be Traffic already feel

space Furthermore its playing would already per

submitted large

rhis

have

Sean

church

used

occupants

household

of comments

green We

that

McCorriston

the be

lived

Winchburgh is

from

Monaghan

I that

busy of

housing

already view

count

dangerous purchased

objects

1012/P/05

village.

Block

matters at

their the

parkiand

and

space

Glasgow

the

our

street Comments Planning as

McCorriston, 11:30

village Winchburgh

developers plus

have

May

bikes

several

3 green

street

busy

estate

strongly

boundary

for

average

specified

visitors

partially

the

2015

this

- been

for

find to

far

parkland and

thus

with

space

terms just

for

the strongly

of Planning

house revised

many Wendy

11:30

this

made.

object.

intend scooters

Planning

the

22 retaining

and

most

now

new

(grid

occupied.

opposite

May is

houses

conditions

years

specifically

far

now is

masterpian development

attracting

houses

on feel young

Application

critical

ref.

Application

2015 summary -

heavier

building

the

freely

and

the

where

308098

our are

be children

lovely

from

for having

development

recently of

vacant

house

built

families

traffic

both

planning

near

on.

IJVE/0287/MSC/15

the

was

674911)

scenic

reflect

the

two

upon

out

was

Church

Sean current

open and

full

comments

cars

Monaghan.

provided

L) 4

25ich

below. I

and new residents kids to play together

2 Commevut-

LJt

C RAr

UStontQr fl -Wcq--c a4cL Oct cl-tb Q&e,rc

* hJ&wj fV7rs -

pwp, C DQ7tT4IS

USItYflO

jacck Vek)

lYj C

hoymi ed,

-Ji ad -Acpprcvaj It

F 4 LVbn ova (cjr’cA VL-t’v’

J1Jxw. ncktt-tvçL vat&

-t44J0 9

31YonL Ovu1r OtAv (frJku 1

rop. c&c± &.Jd j -J--kQ

MaM-y oç et* hd}1&e Cu.-’d Lg f-rt}1t oo°is

ci 3 JeLJS csj kis

Vt-QkJ Mc\,{124’s

ie-o Thu L4Q-fla

pocscbL4? vL cwd kcnws -f1A 1 s ri9ii) CsbOY.

to)tJ b

pL&civu.n vt kot -frtu cwtci

cJL pc’ss&1 js2i€ V-4L.dC (Qtv

CCYllflCh 023

yianI’-L

9r 14 ’ loot uc+’- ovrd Qk.Z&yQ I,3 7/rL4sc//5 tiA & N?pb2 (AttEst 9 p

0 -- I

e ‘3 -s VV, p-fl) Q&-,

- c

V V

%2. p 4- I

() 0

V . C A -ç I ‘1 V 7k 2’ V