Intelligent Design" (ID) Creationisms, Which Was Recently Invented As a Way to Teach Creationism in the Public School System Without Mentioning the Word "God"

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Intelligent Design © 2009, Dustin J. Penn IV. Creationism: the Evolution of Genesis and Other Creation Myths "Creation myths have a place in education – but it's in the history lessons of secular schools, and nowhere else." - Anthony C. Grayling, 20081 Summary This section provides an overview of creationism, the belief that Genesis or other creation myths provide factual accounts for the origins and development of humans or other species (the word myth is used here to refer a traditional story or narrative explaining how the world and humankind came to be in their present form. The word myth need not imply a falsehood, contrary to its more popular usage). Creation myths include religious accounts of gods, miracles, and other supernatural phenomena. There are two separate accounts of creation in Genesis, and these stories originated historically from older myths of origin that have evolved over time. Today, there is a wide variety of creation myths, and many forms of creationism, and the various versions can be categorized according to the degree to which they accept scientific accounts of human origins (e.g., some creationists reject geology, paleontology, and biology, others only reject biology, whereas others only reject applying evolutionary biology to humans). This section also explains why Genesis and other creation myths should be taught in schools - but only as comparative religion or mythology and not as science. Science classrooms should not be used as a vehicle for promoting a particular creation myth, and whenever Genesis is taught, students should also be exposed to the diversity of creation myths that have evolved in different societies. Outline 1. Creation Myths 2. Genesis: the Origins of Creationism 3. The Varieties of Creationism 4. Equal Time for The Flying Spaghetti Monster "Myth"? 5. The Dangers of Teaching Creation Myths As Science 1. Creation Myths "In attempting to understand who we are, every human culture has invented a corpus of myth… We are cut off from our past, separated from our origins, not through some amnesia or lobotomy, but because of the brevity of our lives and the immense, unfathomed vistas of time that separate us from our coming to be… We humans are like a newborn baby left on a doorstep, with no note explaining who it is, where it came from… We long to see the orphan’s file." – Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan (1992)2 Creation myths are stories about how the universe, earth, humans, or other living things come into being, and they generally involve gods or other supernatural beings. Myths are traditional and religious stories that chronicle the activities of supernatural beings, ancestors or heroes. The gods may create the universe from nothing or work with materials that have always existed. Similarly, they may create humans or a group’s ancestors from nothing, shape them from clay, or give birth to them. The gods have human characteristics or they are spirits capable of taking human form. Creation myths may describe the origins of the gods themselves, adventures of their lives, and their activities in creating the universe. They also involve stories about heroes, conflict, revenge, treachery and other human intrigues. These stories are mostly oral, though many have been written down. For example, Hesiod’s Theogony (ca. 700 BC) describes the origins of the gods of ancient Greece. Ovid’s Metamorphoses is a narrative poem from 8 AD Rome that describes the creation and history of the world. The Rigveda (written between 1500-1000 BC) is an ancient collection of Sanskrit hymns, and one of the oldest texts in any Indo-European language. It is part of sacred Hindu mythology and describes the creation of the universe by the deity Brahma, and the propagation and destruction of life in the universe with two other deities, Vishnu and Shiva. There are many different creation myths around the world, and many share common themes, such as the following:3 Primordial Parents Creation Stories. "The universe was created by the first parents" (Cook Islanders, Egyptians, Greeks, Luiseño Indians, Tahitians, Zuni Indians) Spoken Edict Creation Stories. "The universe was created by commands given by a god or gods." (Egyptians, Greek, Sumerians, Hebrews, Maidu Indians, Mayans) Cosmic Egg Creation Stories. "The universe was created by the hatching of an egg" (Chinese, Finnish, Greek, Hindu, Japanese, Persians, Samoans). Sea Creation Stories. "The universe was created from out of the sea." (Burmese, Choctaw Indians, Egyptians, Icelanders, Maui Hawaiians) Slain Monster Creation Stories. "The universe was created from the parts of a slain monster" (Gilbert Islanders, Greeks, Indochinese, Kabyles of Africa, Koreans, Sumero- Babylonians) Endless Cycle Creation Stories. "The universe was never created and will never cease to exist; it is eternal though as it passes an endless series of cycles" (Jainism in India) Creation myths can be fascinating, entertaining stories, yet creationists take these tales literally and accept them as historical and scientific facts. Creationists do not accept all myths of origin as factual, but instead accept only a particular myth, and usually the one held by their family, society or religious group. Myths of origin are among the most common stories told about gods, and therefore, they also have particular religious importance. Creationists hold their creation myth to be true, but moreover, they usually consider it to be sacred, i.e., holy, worthy of special veneration, and sacrilege to question its validity. It is not completely clear why people adopt and promote creation myths. It is often suggested that these stories are attempts to understand the world, told to satisfy children’s curiosity and provide moral lessons. Creation myths seem to be much more, however. Such myths are central aspects of the world’s religious institutions, and are used to represent a religious group’s worldview, societal norms, and moral values. As one anthropologist noted: "Origin myths provide answers to questions about how things began; equally important, they also serve to establish order among values and to justify, by reference to these values, the major customs and institutions of society." Thus, creation myths are used to explain, and to justify the status quo and provide legitimacy for certain norms and institutions within a society. This later aspect of creation myths helps understand the conflicts between creationists, who embrace the Judeo-Christian creation myth, versus scientists who attack it as false, and also why evolution is often misunderstood as a political attempt to justify the status quo.4 The term creationism is generally used in a narrow sense to refer to acceptance of the creation myth contained in the book of Genesis, the first of book of the Jewish Torah and the Old Testament of the Christian Bible. Creationists hold Genesis to be an Figure 1. Where Do We Come From? accurate account of the origins of the universe, and many aim to also have this creation myth taught in public schools as the basis for chemistry, physics, geology, biology and other sciences. Such religious intrusions into science have lead to major disputes between science versus religion. To understand why such proposals are preposterous, it is necessary to consider what creationists’ believe and are seeking to have taught in science classrooms. 2. Genesis: the Origins and Evolution of Creationism Genesis contains a creation myth, which like all myths, has changed over time. The origins of the stories in Genesis are unclear, as there are no Hebrew versions older than the 2nd century BC (except for the fragments among the Dead Sea scrolls). Most scholars agree that different authors made different contributions at different times between 950 and 500 BC. Some of the changes in Genesis have been historically documented, as it has undergone several translations. It was translated into Greek from Hebrew in the 3rd century BC, and later into Latin, which was then translated into English (King James version in 1611), and other languages, which has resulted in many alterations (e.g., "Genesis" means "birth" or "origin," and it was a Greek name given to the book that had previously been called "B’reshith," which is Hebrew for "in the beginning" following the opening sentence). These different versions of Genesis are part of the reason that there is no consensus among creationists about what this book actually states.5 In the beginning, Genesis explains how Elohim (meaning "God" or "Gods" in Hebrew) created the heavens, earth, humans and all living things, though it actually contains two separate accounts of the creation. In the first account, Genesis 1:1, Elohim made the heavens and earth in six days, vegetation on the second, and humans on the last day. Elohim created both adam (which means "mankind" in Hebrew and adam is not used as proper name until chapter 5), and woman simultaneously, and Elohim says "Let us make man in our own image…." In the second account, Genesis 2:4, Yahweh Elohim (Yahweh is often translated as "Lord," although it is actually the proper name of the Hebrew God) forms Man from the dust of earth, places him in a garden a place called "Eden," and then later forms Woman, from a rib he takes from Adam, to provide him with a companion (Figure 2). In this version, "no shrub of the field had yet appeared on earth and no plant of the field had yet sprung up" Figure 2. Bosch's when God made Adam out of the dust. Due to such inconsistencies and painting: The Garden changes in style, the accounts in Genesis are thought to have come from two of Earthly Delights. separate creation myths written by different authors at different times. According to Genesis, Adam and Eve had three sons, Cain, Abel (who is murdered by Cain), and Seth, and it lists their decedents from Cain and then Seth, through eight generations, as they lead to the Israelites, the presumed audience of the narrative.
Recommended publications
  • Truth Behind Noah's Deluge
    Geography within a Historical Myth – Truth behind Noah’s Deluge Dr. Saswati Roy Assistant Professor, Sarsuna College, Calcutta University Prof. Malay Mukhopadhyay Former Head of the Geography Department Visva Bharati, Santiniketan Myths about great floods Mexico • There are a large number of Mesoamerican flood myths like the Nahua (central Mexico), Tarahumara (Northern Mexico), Michoacan (Mexico), Cora (east of the Huichols), Totonac (east of Mexico), Aztec Flood Myth and others. The great Maya civilization also have documentation of such a mythical flood. India • Satyavrata, the 7th Manu considered the first king to rule this earth, who saved mankind from the great flood — after being warned of it by the Matsya avatar of Vishnu, who had also advised him to build a giant boat. China • We can see those elements in the Chinese myth where Gong Gong, so ordered by the head of the gods, created a flood as a punishment for human misbehavior. It lasted 22 years, until the hero started to dam the waters. The hero was killed for this act, but from his corpse sprang a son who finished his father's project. Rome • The Greco-Roman story, recounted by Ovid, is another tale of collusion among the gods to punish evil humanity. Jupiter persuaded Neptune to flood all the earth except for the summit of Mt. Parnassus. THE MYTHICAL NOAH’S FLOOD The story most familiar to many people is the biblical account of Noah and his ark. Genesis (A chapter in Old Testament) tells how “God saw that the wickedness of man was great” and decided to destroy all of creation.
    [Show full text]
  • Archons (Commanders) [NOTICE: They Are NOT Anlien Parasites], and Then, in a Mirror Image of the Great Emanations of the Pleroma, Hundreds of Lesser Angels
    A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES WATCH THIS IMPORTANT VIDEO UFOs, Aliens, and the Question of Contact MUST-SEE THE OCCULT REASON FOR PSYCHOPATHY Organic Portals: Aliens and Psychopaths KNOWLEDGE THROUGH GNOSIS Boris Mouravieff - GNOSIS IN THE BEGINNING ...1 The Gnostic core belief was a strong dualism: that the world of matter was deadening and inferior to a remote nonphysical home, to which an interior divine spark in most humans aspired to return after death. This led them to an absorption with the Jewish creation myths in Genesis, which they obsessively reinterpreted to formulate allegorical explanations of how humans ended up trapped in the world of matter. The basic Gnostic story, which varied in details from teacher to teacher, was this: In the beginning there was an unknowable, immaterial, and invisible God, sometimes called the Father of All and sometimes by other names. “He” was neither male nor female, and was composed of an implicitly finite amount of a living nonphysical substance. Surrounding this God was a great empty region called the Pleroma (the fullness). Beyond the Pleroma lay empty space. The God acted to fill the Pleroma through a series of emanations, a squeezing off of small portions of his/its nonphysical energetic divine material. In most accounts there are thirty emanations in fifteen complementary pairs, each getting slightly less of the divine material and therefore being slightly weaker. The emanations are called Aeons (eternities) and are mostly named personifications in Greek of abstract ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Darren Aronofsky's Noah (2014) As an Environmental Cinematic Midrash Lila Moore Zefat Academic College & Cybernetic Futures Institute, [email protected]
    Journal of Religion & Film Volume 22 Article 35 Issue 1 April 2018 3-30-2018 Humanity's Second Chance: Darren Aronofsky's Noah (2014) as an Environmental Cinematic Midrash Lila Moore Zefat Academic College & Cybernetic Futures Institute, [email protected] Marianna Ruah-Midbar Shapiro Zefat Academic College & Schechter Institute of Jewish Studies, [email protected] Recommended Citation Moore, Lila and Ruah-Midbar Shapiro, Marianna (2018) "Humanity's Second Chance: Darren Aronofsky's Noah (2014) as an Environmental Cinematic Midrash," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 22 : Iss. 1 , Article 35. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol22/iss1/35 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Humanity's Second Chance: Darren Aronofsky's Noah (2014) as an Environmental Cinematic Midrash Abstract This article proposes an interpretative study of Daren Aronofsky and Ari Handel's film Noah (2014). Our main assertion is that the film attempts to present a contemporary interpretation of the biblical flood ts ory by incorporating values and urgent issues of the 21st century Western society, such as environmentalism, fundamentalism and eco-feminism. The ap per details various traditions that serve as inspirations to the filmmakers in the re-telling of the flood ym th, and elaborates on the midrashic traditions that were intertwined – or else omitted – in the process of creating the innovative cinematic midrash. It also points to the psychologization of God in the film and its theological implications.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Creation and Flood Myths Found World Wide Have a Common Origin?
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 5 Print Reference: Pages 517-528 Article 47 2003 Do Creation and Flood Myths Found World Wide Have a Common Origin? Jerry Bergman Northwest State College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Bergman, Jerry (2003) "Do Creation and Flood Myths Found World Wide Have a Common Origin?," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 5 , Article 47. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol5/iss1/47 DO CREATION AND FLOOD MYTHS FOUND WORLD WIDE HAVE A COMMON ORIGIN? Jerry Bergman, Ph.D. Northwest State College Archbold, OH 43543 KEYWORDS: Creation myths, the Genesis account of creation, Noah’s flood ABSTRACT An extensive review of both creation and flood myths reveals that there is a basic core of themes in all of the extant creation and flood myths. This fact gives strong evidence of a common origin of the myths based on actual historical events.
    [Show full text]
  • How the World Was Made a Cheyenne Creation Myth
    How the World Was Made A Cheyenne Creation Myth At the beginning of time, there was nothing but darkness. Maheo the All Spirit lived alone in this darkness. He was tired of the dark—there was nothing to see and nothing to hear. Maheo was very powerful and he decided to use his power to create the world. Maheo created water in the form of a great salty lake and decided that all life would come from this water. At first, he made animals that swim in the water like fish. Next, Maheo created the sand at the bottom of the giant salty lake. Then he created bottom-feeding creatures like snails, lobsters, and mussels to live on that sand. 1 © 2018 Reading Is Fundamental • Content and art created by Simone Ribke How the World Was Made Next, Maheo made animals that live on the water. These included many types of birds such as geese, terns, loons, and ducks. Maheo delighted to hear their wings flapping and their feet splashing on the water. But Maheo could only hear them, he could not see them. “I would like to see the things I created,” Maheo said to himself. So Maheo created light and delighted in seeing all the fish swimming in the water and all the birds swimming on the water. “How beautiful,” Maheo said to himself, for he was truly amazed by his creations. Soon, a goose called out to Maheo: “Great Maheo, thank you for making this wonderful world. We are so happy, but the birds are not fish.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Noah and Other Flood Narratives
    The Story of Noah and Other Flood Narratives The biblical story of Noah and the Great Flood (see Genesis 6:5—8:22) offers one of the best biblical examples of modern scholarly analysis put to use. Because many other ancient Middle East cultures had flood stories, scholars can easily use source criticism to evaluate the similarities and differences of the biblical Flood story with the flood stories of Israel’s neighbors. And because the biblical Flood story has clear signs of the redacting (combining) of the Yahwist (J) and Priestly (P) sources, scholars can use redaction criticism to separate these two sources and learn about the peculiarities of each original source and the motives of the Israelite editor who combined them. The Biblical Flood Story Versus Other Ancient Flood Stories The two flood stories of the ancient Middle East that most resemble the biblical Flood story are the Babylonian flood myth, Atrahasis, and the Sumerian flood myth on Tablet XI of the Epic of Gilgamesh. In Atrahasis, the flood is the result of a quarrel among the gods. This leads to the god Enlil proposing to destroy all humans with a flood (because they were too noisy). The god Enki arranges for the man Atrahasis to overhear him talk about the flood, so Atrahasis builds an ark and escapes the flood with his family and animals. The gods are later sorry they destroyed humanity, because they lost their source of free labor! The Epic of Gilgamesh is similar to the flood story in Atrahasis, probably because the two stories have a common ancestry.
    [Show full text]
  • Every Creation Story
    Every Creation Story Creation from chaos Chaos (cosmogony) Enûma Eliš (Babylonian creation myth) Genesis creation myth (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) Greek cosmogonical myth Jamshid Korean creation narratives Kumulipo Leviathan (Book of Job 38–41 creation myth) Mandé creation myth Pangu Raven in Creation Serer creation myth Sumerian creation myth Tungusic creation myth Unkulunkulu Väinämöinen Viracocha Earth diver Earth-diver Ainu creation myth Cherokee creation myth Iroquois creation myth Väinämöinen Yoruba creation myth Ob-Ugric creation myth Emergence Emergence Hopi creation myth Maya creation of the world myth Diné Bahaneʼ (Navajo) Zuni creation myth ( creation of self ) Ex nihilo Debate between sheep and grain Barton cylinder Ancient Egyptian creation myths Kabezya-Mpungu Māori myths Mbombo Ngai Popol Vuh World parent World parent Coatlicue Enûma Eliš Greek cosmogonical myth Greek cosmogonical myth Heliopolis creation myth Hiranyagarbha creation myth Kumulipo Rangi and Papa Völuspá Divine twins Divine twins Proto-Indo-European creation myths Regional Africa Ancient Egyptian creation myths Fon creation myth Kaang creation story (Bushmen) Kintu myth (Bugandan) Mandé creation myth Mbombo (Kuba, Bakuba or Bushongo/Boshongo) Ngai (Kamba, Kikuyu and Maasai ) Serer creation myth (cosmogony of the Serer people of Senegal, the Gambia and Mauritania) Unkulunkulu (Zulu) Yoruba creation Americas Mesoamerica Coatlicue (Aztec) Maya creation of the world myth Popol Vuh (Quiché Mayan) Mid North America Anishinaabeg creation stories Cherokee creation
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative World Mythology
    Comparative World Mythology Harriet Schlueter INTRODUCTION The high school where I teach is in the process of a transformation. It was once a predominantly white school with a high number of graduates going to four-year colleges on academic scholarships. In the past fifteen years, the focus has changed. Discipline relegates academics to the back seat. Many of our students come from lower income families and must work to make ends meet at home. They are happy to get the 70 they need for passing rather than strive for a higher grade because they do not have the time to do their homework. Many of the parents do not encourage the students in the way that is a teacher's dream. Most of the motivation comes from the students themselves or from the teachers. Few students have access to computers, books, magazines, or encyclopedias. The school also does not have adequate facilities to accommodate an entire classroom set aside to have one computer per student with a working printer. The only classrooms with a "class set" of computers are the computer labs. This makes it difficult to use the Internet as the powerful teaching and research tool it could be. Also, the library in my school has very few recent books on mythology. Some of the books even date back to the 1930's. Because the students do not have much time once they leave school to work on their projects, I have set up a unit that takes place in the classroom. It combines both group work and individual work.
    [Show full text]
  • Creation Myth Pathfinder English 9 Mrs. Golden Academic Year 2006-2007
    CREATION MYTH PATHFINDER ENGLISH 9 MRS. GOLDEN ACADEMIC YEAR 2006-2007 Quite a bit of information about the creation myths of many cultures was found by searching Facts on File, Ancient History Database and The American Indian Database. The Following websites have been identified as ones that should be helpful in your search for information on the various Creation Myths. Some annotation has been included to assist you. Remember to ask Mrs. Pennell for the location of print sources when you visit the library. International Association of Intercultural Education: The mythic journeys sites that follow are from a collection by the above association. They are described as follows: A Flash-animated exploration of the culture’s beliefs about how the world and human life were created. Includes overviews of the particular culture and the pantheon of gods, along with a list of suggested exercises. Part of a larger site that examines stories about creation told by living faith traditions as well as those that have passed into history. An excellent site for learning how people from different cultures view their origins or for any comparative study of world religions. Norse Creation http://mythicjourneys.org/bigmyth/myths/english/2_norse_full.htm Chinese Creation http://mythicjourneys.org/bigmyth/myths/english/2_chinese_full.htm And also for China: http://www.windows.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/tour.cgi?link=/mythology/china_culture.html Mayan Creation http://mythicjourneys.org/bigmyth/myths/english/2_maya_full.htm Egyptian Creation http://mythicjourneys.org/bigmyth/myths/english/2_egyptian_full.htm
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of the Origin and Divine Causation of Death in Ancient Near Eastern Literature and in the Old Testament Lazarus Castang Andrews University
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2011 A Comparative Analysis of the Origin and Divine Causation of Death in Ancient Near Eastern Literature and in the Old Testament Lazarus Castang Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Analysis Commons, Biblical Studies Commons, and the Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons Recommended Citation Castang, Lazarus, "A Comparative Analysis of the Origin and Divine Causation of Death in Ancient Near Eastern Literature and in the Old Testament" (2011). Dissertations. 23. http://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/23 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ORIGIN AND DIVINE CAUSATION OF DEATH IN ANCIENT NEAR EASTERN LITERATURE AND IN THE OLD TESTAMENT by Lazarus Castang Adviser: Randall W. Younker ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ORIGIN AND DIVINE CAUSATION OF DEATH IN ANCIENT NEAR EASTERN LITERATURE AND IN THE OLD TESTAMENT Name of researcher: Lazarus Castang Name and degree of faculty adviser: Randall W. Younker, Ph.D. Date completed: September 2011 The present dissertation attempts a comparative analysis of both the origin of death in the creation accounts and the divine causation of death in the main flood accounts in the ancient Near Eastern (ANE) literature and the Hebrew Old Testament (OT).
    [Show full text]
  • Austen Aquino Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Prerequisite For
    "IN NOVA FERT ANIMUS MUTATAS DICERE FORMAS CORPORA": A COMPARISON OF THREE THEMES IN OVID AND ANCIENT NEAR EASTERN MYTHOLOGY Austen Aquino Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Prerequisite for Honors in Comparative Literature under the advisement of Edward Silver April 2017 © 2017 Austen Aquino 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are so many people that I need to thank without whom this beast of a thesis would merely be a pipe dream. First and foremost, I have to thank my parents for everything they've done to help me during my time at Wellesley, and for letting me run away to go to a school on the East Coast that they'd never heard of before. Mom and Dad, thank you for trusting me, believing in me, raising me so that I felt I had the ability to take on a project like this one, and not letting me come home after my first week here when I called you crying because I accidentally shrank all my clothes in the school dryers. Also, thanks Mom for sending me pictures of the dog almost everyday this year for emotional support. I also need to thank the myriad of wonderful friends in my life for their undying support. Vickey, Willow, Emily, Maya, Zaynah, Bridget, Clara, Kaylie, Jeanette, Clarissa, Ryan, Lisa, Vianna, and Ethan — thank you all so much for making sure that I was eating, drinking water, and sleeping, for sending me encouraging Snapchats and animal videos at 3 AM, for leaving me notes on my thesis carrel, for staying late to have Domino's delivered to the library with me, and for listening to me complain over the course of my year-long self-indulgent pity-party.
    [Show full text]
  • Theology of Judgment in Genesis 6-9
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2005 Theology of Judgment in Genesis 6-9 Chun Sik Park Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Park, Chun Sik, "Theology of Judgment in Genesis 6-9" (2005). Dissertations. 121. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/121 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary THEOLOGY OF JUDGMENT IN GENESIS 6-9 A Disseration Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Chun Sik Park July 2005 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3182013 Copyright 2005 by Park, Chun Sik All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]