Water Quality Improvement Plan Douglas Shire Far North Queensland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Quality Improvement Plan Douglas Shire Far North Queensland Water Quality Improvement Plan Douglas Shire Far North Queensland December 2006 Prepared by Douglas Shire Council, Far North Queensland Funds provided by Natural Heritage Trust, an Australian Government Initiative Compiled by Richard Davis, 2006 This publication may be cited as Richard Davis (2006): Douglas Shire Water Quality Improvement Plan. Douglas Shire Council Executive Summary Background 1. In late 2003 the Queensland and Australian Governments agreed to the Reef Water Quality Protection Plan (RWQPP), the objective of which is to halt and reverse the decline in water quality entering the Reef within 10 years. The RWQPP identifies nutrients and sediment as pollutants impacting on the inner reefs and seagrass areas of the Reef. Under the auspices of the RWQPP, Water Quality Improvement Plans (WQIPs) are being developed and implemented as the primary management vehicle for achieving long-term ecologically sustainable pollutant loads to Reef waters. 2. Douglas Shire was chosen for the initial WQIP and associated projects, which commenced prior to release of the RWQPP, because of (a) the willingness of the Douglas community to accept and adopt change to protect its environment, and (b) the relative small size of the Douglas catchments and therefore likelihood of demonstrating effective water quality management over a shorter period. 3. WQIPs, prepared through the NHT Coastal Catchments Initiative (CCI), are environmental management plans that codify and implement Australia’s National Water Quality Management Strategy (NWQMS) and the National Principles for the Provision of Water for Ecosystems. 4. This WQIP: • identifies current status of pollutant loads; • identifies the Environmental Values (EVs) of water bodies in Douglas Shire, and the Water Quality Objectives (WQOs) that will protect the EVs; and • commits to a set of management actions to achieve and maintain those EVs and WQOs, and which will take the first steps to reducing the current pollutant loads towards the achievement of sustainable pollutant loads. • derives estimates of pre-European and current loads of nutrients and sediments from Douglas Shire; • develops modelling and monitoring systems, and adaptive implementation strategies. 5. Implementation of the WQIP will require sustained partnerships between the Douglas Shire Council, FNQ NRM Ltd, relevant Queensland Government agencies, and industry bodies such as Canegrowers and Agforce (see Table 1) 6. The Wet Tropics NRM Board (FNQ NRM Ltd) has developed a natural resource management plan for the region under the NHT’s regional NRM programme. The Australian Government considers implementation of WQIPs a core deliverable of the regional NRM programme. Therefore the Douglas Shire WQIP will be integrated into the Wet Tropics NRM Plan and its implementation accorded a priority for investment under the regional NRM arrangements. Environmental Values and Water Quality Objectives 1. Douglas Shire contains parts of two World Heritage Areas – the Wet Tropics and the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Areas (WHAs). The Environmental Values (EVs) of the freshwaters, estuaries and near-shore waters of Douglas Shire have been established by the Queensland Government, through consultation with the Shire community. These have now been scheduled under an amendment to the Queensland Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 1997. The EVs are the waterway values and uses to be protected for these areas. A census conducted by CSIRO found widespread community support for retention of the natural values of the Shire’s waterways. 2. Total suspended sediments (TSS), and the nutrients - total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) are the three parameters of concern in this WQIP. Water Quality Objectives (WQOs) were established for these parameters to protect the EVs. Subsequent work by QEPA has expanded the WQOs to other parameters and to the whole Shire. These added parameters and waterways have not been included in this plan. 3. Comparison of the WQOs with an ambient water quality monitoring program showed that water quality in the Daintree River and the upper Mossman River meets the water quality objectives for all pollutants of concern. Forms of nitrogen exceed the WQOs in the lower reaches of the Mossman River, while phosphate exceeds the WQO in the lowest reach of the Mossman River and Cassowary Creek. The turbidity WQO is also exceeded in Cassowary Creek. Lower Mowbray exceeded turbidity, total nitrogen and phosphorous. 4. The principal point sources of the three parameters of concern in this WQIP in the Shire include the sewerage treatment plant at Mossman, unsewered residential areas, tourist resorts, boat discharges (polluter can be isolated, but discharge is diffuse) and aquaculture. Principal diffuse sources include nitrogen losses from sugarcane production, sediment loss from shire’s modified drainage pattern, and streambank erosion. 5. There has been no long-term monitoring suitable for calculating pollutant loads, (the amount of pollutant eg suspended solids delivered over a period of time). Using CSIRO modelling and expert opinion, TSS, TN and TP loads are estimated to be 134,000 tonnes, 2,250 tonnes and 179 tonnes per annum. Uncleared land, principally in the WHA, is by far the major source of all three pollutants due to the dominant share in area within the catchments. 6. The same models were used to calculate pre-European settlement loads as 72,800, 1,980 and 122 tonnes p.a. for TSS, TN and TP respectively. These values are used as the interim long-term Aspirational targets for the WQIP. These values will be reviewed with further information generated during the 7-year life of the WQIP. Pollutant Loads 1. Sugar cane is the principal crop grown in the Shire. There is some beef grazing in the mid- Daintree catchment and small pockets within the other catchments. Tourism, based on the two WHAs, is a major activity in the Shire with Port Douglas the centre of this activity. 2. The principal point sources of nutrients in the Shire include the sewerage treatment plant at Mossman, unsewered residential areas and tourist resorts, boat discharges and aquaculture. 3. Principal diffuse sources include nutrient and sediment losses from sugarcane production, cattle grazing, and streambank erosion. There has been no long-term monitoring suitable for measuring current pollutant loads. Using CSIRO modelling, TSS, TN and TP loads are estimated to be 134,000 tonnes, 2,258 tonnes and 179 tonnes per annum respectively. Land which is relatively undisturbed, principally in the World Heritage Area, is by far the major contributor to all three pollutants, due to its much higher area than other land uses. Further water monitoring data inputted into the modelling will improve these estimates. 4. Pre-European settlement loads of TSS, TN and TP are estimated from modelling to have been 73,000 tonnes, 1,980 tonnes, and 122 tonnes per annum respectively. These values are used as long term aspirational targets for the WQIP, as it is believed that achievement of these targets will protect the EVs of the Great Barrier Reef. These values equate to a reduction of 45% for TSS, 12% for TN, and 32% for TP. However, there are very high uncertainties associated with these modelled pre-European and current day loads. These uncertainties will be addressed through this WQIP’s adaptive management strategy. 5. In the absence of precise information on impacts of land based pollution from Douglas Shire on the Reef, it is proposed to set a 25 year load reduction target of half the Aspirational targets; that is, 22.5% reduction of TSS, 6% of TN and 16% of TP for protection of the GBR. These targets are effectively Resource Condition Targets (RCTs), and equate to half the anthropogenic (human-induced) loads of these pollutants. Both the Aspirational and Resource Condition Targets will be reviewed during the life of this WQIP. Environmental Flows 1. Aquatic life in the rivers and estuaries of Douglas Shire depends on the continuation of long term flow patterns as well as good water quality. Flow patterns can be modified through barriers across rivers; extractions of water; discharges of water; changes in land use; and climate change. 2. There are no barriers across Shire rivers, with none planned. There are some small irrigation and town water supply abstractions under licence to the Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Water. The abstractions may have local effects; water supply to Mossman and Port Douglas does not constitute a major component of river flows. 3. There have been major changes to land use, altering runoff patterns in the lowlands. Although there are no monitoring data available, runoff is believed to have become more immediate as a result of vegetation clearance, drainage works and wetland reclamation. The CSIRO modelling shows that 87% of runoff originates in the high rainfall coastal ranges where vegetation is relatively undisturbed. 4. The volumes and patterns of flows in the rivers are not believed to have changed significantly since pre-European times, although there may be some changes in the immediacy of runoff in the lowlands as a result of land use change. 5. The Douglas Shire Council and the Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Water have drafted an MoU containing draft flow objectives. This Plan recommends the following objectives, consistent with the MoU: • Maintain current flow volumes; • Maintain inter-annual and intra-annual natural flow variability; • Prevent barriers to wetland and floodplain inundation;
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Officer
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by GBRMPA eLibrary Sunfish Queensland Inc Freshwater Wetlands and Fish Importance of Freshwater Wetlands to Marine Fisheries Resources in the Great Barrier Reef Vern Veitch Bill Sawynok Report No: SQ200401 Freshwater Wetlands and Fish 1 Freshwater Wetlands and Fish Importance of Freshwater Wetlands to Marine Fisheries Resources in the Great Barrier Reef Vern Veitch1 and Bill Sawynok2 Sunfish Queensland Inc 1 Sunfish Queensland Inc 4 Stagpole Street West End Qld 4810 2 Infofish Services PO Box 9793 Frenchville Qld 4701 Published JANUARY 2005 Cover photographs: Two views of the same Gavial Creek lagoon at Rockhampton showing the extreme natural variability in wetlands depending on the weather. Information in this publication is provided as general advice only. For application to specific circumstances, professional advice should be sought. Sunfish Queensland Inc has taken all steps to ensure the information contained in this publication is accurate at the time of publication. Readers should ensure that they make the appropriate enquiries to determine whether new information is available on a particular subject matter. Report No: SQ200401 ISBN 1 876945 42 7 ¤ Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and Sunfish Queensland All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. Freshwater Wetlands and Fish 2 Table of Contents 1. Acronyms Used in the Report .......................................................................8 2. Definition of Terms Used in the Report.........................................................9 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Burnett Mary WQIP Ecologically Relevant Targets
    Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef TropWATER Report 14/32 Jon Brodie and Stephen Lewis 1 Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef TropWATER Report 14/32 Prepared by Jon Brodie and Stephen Lewis Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University Townsville Phone : (07) 4781 4262 Email: [email protected] Web: www.jcu.edu.au/tropwater/ 2 Information should be cited as: Brodie J., Lewis S. (2014) Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef. TropWATER Report No. 14/32, Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), James Cook University, Townsville, 41 pp. For further information contact: Catchment to Reef Research Group/Jon Brodie and Steven Lewis Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University ATSIP Building Townsville, QLD 4811 [email protected] © James Cook University, 2014. Except as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part of the work may in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or any other means be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or be broadcast or transmitted without the prior written permission of TropWATER. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The copyright owner shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information.
    [Show full text]
  • The Freshwater Crayfish (Family Parastacidae) of Queensland
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Riek, E. F., 1951. The freshwater crayfish (family Parastacidae) of Queensland. Records of the Australian Museum 22(4): 368–388. [30 June 1951]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.22.1951.615 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney nature culture discover Australian Museum science is freely accessible online at http://publications.australianmuseum.net.au 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia 11ft! FRESHWATER CRAYFISH (FAMILY PARASTACIDAE) OF QUEENSLAND WITH AN ApPENDIX DESORIBING OTHlm AV5'lHALIAN SPEClEf'. By E. F. HIEK. (;ommonwealth Scientific and Industrial l~csearch Organization - Divhdon of Entomology, Canberra, A.C.T. (Figures 1-13.) Freshwater crayfish occur in almost every body of fresh water from artificial damfl and natural billabongs (I>tanding water) to headwater creeks and large rivers (flowing water). Generally the species are of considerable size and therefore easily collected, but even so many of the larger forms are unknown scientifically. This paper deals with all the species that have been collected from Queensland. It also includes a few species from New South Wales and other States. No doubt additional species will be found and some of the mOre variable series, at present included under the one specific namc, will be further subdivided. From Queensland nine species are described as new, making a total of seventeen species (of three genera) recorded from that State. The type localities of all but two of these species are in Queensland but some are not restricted to the State. Clark's 1936 and subsequent papers have been used as the basis for further taxonomic studies of the Australian freshwater crayfish.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Days the Great Tropical Drive
    ITINERARY The Great Tropical Drive Queensland – Cairns Cairns – Cooktown – Mareeba – Undara – Charters Towers – Townsville – Ingham – Tully/Mission Beach – Innisfail – Cairns Drive from Cairns to Townsville, through World Heritage-listed reef and rainforests to golden outback savannah. On this journey you won’t miss an inch of Queensland’s tropical splendour. AT A GLANCE Cruise the Great Barrier Reef and trek the ancient Daintree Rainforest. Connect with Aboriginal culture as you travel north to the remote frontier of Cape Tribulation. Explore historic gold mining towns and the lush orchards and plantations of the Tropical Tablelands. Day trip to Magnetic, Dunk and Hinchinbrook Islands and relax in resort towns like Port Douglas and Mission Beach. This journey has a short 4WD section, with an alternative road for conventional vehicles. > Cairns – Port Douglas (1 hour) > Port Douglas – Cooktown (3 hours) > Cooktown – Mareeba (4.5 hours) DAY ONE > Mareeba – Ravenshoe (1 hour) > Ravenshoe – Undara Volcanic Beach. Continue along the Cook Highway, CAIRNS TO PORT DOUGLAS National Park (2.5 hours) Meander along the golden chain of stopping at Rex Lookout for magical views over the Coral Sea beaches. Drive into the > Undara Volcanic National Park – beaches stretching north from Cairns. Surf Charters Towers (5.5 hours) at Machans Beach and swim at Holloways sophisticated tropical oasis Port Douglas, and palm-fringed Yorkey’s Knob. Picnic which sits between World Heritage-listed > Charters Towers – Townsville (1.5 hours) beneath sea almond trees in Trinity rainforest and reef. Walk along the white Beach or lunch in the tropical village. sands of Four Mile Beach and climb > Townsville – Ingham (1.5 hours) Flagstaff Hill for striking views over Port Hang out with the locals on secluded > Ingham – Cardwell (0.5 hours) Douglas.
    [Show full text]
  • With Its Unique Location Deep Within the Magnificent Daintree Rainforest, There’S an Abundance of Things to Do Both in and Around the Daintree Ecolodge
    With its unique location deep within the magnificent Daintree Rainforest, there’s an abundance of things to do both in and around the Daintree Ecolodge. The region has some beautiful landmarks that are a must see during your time in the region. We have listed the top places to visit and experience to ensure you get the most out of your stay. Explore the beauty of the Daintree Rainforest on a guided ‘A Walk Through Time’ rainforest walk on the grounds of the Daintree Ecolodge. On a leisurely 1.5 hour stroll through the enchanted rainforest, discover the lodge’s private onsite waterfall. The waterfall and swimming hole is sacred to the Kuku Yalanji women who for thousands of years have bathed in its crystal-clear waters for healing and spiritual beliefs. Learn about the unique and amazing plants, insects, birds and other wildlife that surround us. Much of the wildlife you will see here cannot be found anywhere else in the world, with some species dating back 135 million years. The local Kuku Yalanji people have named the land on which the Daintree Ecolodge sits ‘Wawu-karrba’ which means ‘healing of the spirit.’ With approval from the local Indigenous tribe elders, each of the Daintree Wellness Spa treatments combine the wisdom of their culture, healing, medicines and spirituality. Using the pure waters of the pristine onsite waterfall and the powerful properties of nourishing botanical products, many found in the Daintree Rainforest, guests can experience a renewed sense of wellbeing with each unique treatment. The treatment rooms are open roofed opening up to the rainforest canopy above and the sounds and smells of the wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Daintree Catchment
    WET TROPICS REGION Daintree catchment water quality targets r e v Catchment profile i Ruby R n Reef a st n Under the Reef 2050 Water Quality Improvement Plan, water quality E a Norm n a A Endeavour nby R Reef i targets have been set for each catchment that drains to the Great v e Barrier Reef. These targets (given over the page) consider land use and r pollutant loads from each catchment. E n d e a v o u r C a t c h m e n t r 2 Rive The Daintree catchment covers 2107 km (10% of the Wet Tropics y b an m region). Rainfall averages 2521 mm a year, which results in river r o N Pickersgill discharges to the coast of about 2887 GL each year. st e Reef Escape W Reef Weary Evening The Daintree catchment is the northernmost catchment in the Wet N o r m a n b y C a t c h m e n t Bay Reef Tropics region. The catchment is divided by two major waterways, the Daintree River in the south and the Bloomfield River in the north, and a number of smaller waterways that flow from the mountain ranges to the coast. The majority of the catchment is covered by mountain Morning Reef ranges with a narrow lowland coastal plain. The highland section is mostly reserved for conservation and is included in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area. Agriculture and urban areas are primarily located in the lowland coastal section. Mackay Reef Cape Tribulation .
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-20 Budget Estimates Volume of Additional Information
    2019-20 Budget Estimates Volume of Additional Information Reports No. 30 and 31, 56th Parliament Economics and Governance Committee August 2019 Table of Contents Correspondence regarding leave to participate in the hearing Questions on notice and responses Speaker of the Legislative Assembly Questions on notice and responses Premier and Minister for the Trade Questions on notice and responses Deputy Premier, Treasurer and Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships Questions on notice and responses Minister for Local Government, Minister for Racing and Minister for Multicultural Affairs Answers to questions taken on notice at the hearing 23 July 2019 Responses to requests for additional information taken at the hearing 23 July 2019 Documents tabled at the hearing 23 July 2019 Correspondence regarding leave to participate in the hearing Correspondence 1. 25 June 2019 – Letter from Deb Frecklingon MP, Leader of the Opposition and Shadow Minister for Trade 2. 4 July 2019 – Letter from Sandy Bolton MP, Member for Noosa 3. 16 July 2019 – Letter from Jon Krause MP, Member for Scenic Rim 4. 16 July 2019 – Email from Michael Berkman MP, Member for Maiwar 25 June 2019 Economics and Governance Committee Attention: Mr Linus Power MP, Chair By email: [email protected] Dear Mr Power Reference is made to the consideration of 2019/2020 portfolio budget estimates. Pursuant to section 181(e) of the Standing Rules and Orders of the Legislative Assembly, I seek leave for the following Members to attend the public estimates hearings of the Committee, scheduled for Tuesday 23 July 2019: • Deb Frecklington MP, Member for Nanango • Tim Mander MP, Member for Everton • Jarrod Bleijie MP, Member for Kawana • Dr Christian Rowan MP, Member for Moggill • Ann Leahy MP, Member for Warrego • John-Paul Langbroek MP, Member for Surfers Paradise Should you have any queries, please contact Peter Coulson of my office.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclone Sadie Flood Plumes in the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: Composition and Consequences
    WORKSHOP SERIES No 22 Cyclone Sadie Flood Plumes in the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: Composition and Consequences Proceedings of a workshop held in Townsville Queensland, Australia, 10 November 1994, at the Australian Institute of Marine Science. Edited by Andrew Steven GREAT BARRIERREEF MARINEPARKAUTHORMY 0 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 1997 ISSN 0156 5842 ISBN 0 642 23014 5 Published February 1997 by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority The opinions expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data: Cyclone Sadie flood plumes in the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon : composition and consequences: proceedings of a workshop held in Townsville, Queensland, Australia, 10 November 1994, at the Australian Institute of Marine Science. Bibliography.’ ISBN 0 642 23014 5. 1. Sediment transport - Queensland - Great Barrier Reef - Congresses. 2. Reef ecology - Queensland - Great Barrier Reef - Congresses. 3. Great Barrier Reef (Qld.) - Congresses. I. Steven, A. D. L. (Andrew David Leslie), 1962 - II. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (Australia). (Series : Workshop series (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (Australia)) ; no. 22). 574.52636709943 COVER PHOTOGRAPH Maria Creek, Kurramine in flood, 2 February 1994 Photograph by Andrew Elliott Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority GREATBARRIERREEF MARmEPARKAuTH0RITY PO Box 1379 Townsville Qld 4810 Telephone (077) 500 700 I Table of Contents Preface Workshop Program Contributed Papers Nutrients and suspended sediment discharge from the Johnstone River catchment during cyclone Sadie HM Hunter .. : . ............................................................. 1 Export of nutrients and suspended sediment from the Herbert River catchment during a flood event associated with cyclone Sadie AW Mitchell and RGV Bramley .
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management in Australia Building Flood Resilience in a Changing Climate
    Flood Risk Management in Australia Building flood resilience in a changing climate December 2020 Flood Risk Management in Australia Building flood resilience in a changing climate Neil Dufty, Molino Stewart Pty Ltd Andrew Dyer, IAG Maryam Golnaraghi (lead investigator of the flood risk management report series and coordinating author), The Geneva Association Flood Risk Management in Australia 1 The Geneva Association The Geneva Association was created in 1973 and is the only global association of insurance companies; our members are insurance and reinsurance Chief Executive Officers (CEOs). Based on rigorous research conducted in collaboration with our members, academic institutions and multilateral organisations, our mission is to identify and investigate key trends that are likely to shape or impact the insurance industry in the future, highlighting what is at stake for the industry; develop recommendations for the industry and for policymakers; provide a platform to our members, policymakers, academics, multilateral and non-governmental organisations to discuss these trends and recommendations; reach out to global opinion leaders and influential organisations to highlight the positive contributions of insurance to better understanding risks and to building resilient and prosperous economies and societies, and thus a more sustainable world. The Geneva Association—International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics Talstrasse 70, CH-8001 Zurich Email: [email protected] | Tel: +41 44 200 49 00 | Fax: +41 44 200 49 99 Photo credits: Cover page—Markus Gebauer / Shutterstock.com December 2020 Flood Risk Management in Australia © The Geneva Association Published by The Geneva Association—International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics, Zurich. 2 www.genevaassociation.org Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Douglas Services
    1 | P a g e Click on the topic you are looking for – All information is correct as at Friday 28/08/2020. If you would like to change your listing at any time please email [email protected] Who is the NDIA and Mission Australia? Douglas Shire Council Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Services Accessible Facilities Access and Inclusion Allied Health – Dietitian Allied Health – Exercise Physiology Allied Health – Life Coaching Allied Health – Occupational Therapy Allied Health – Physiotherapy Allied Health – Podiatry Allied Health – Psychology Allied Health – Speech Pathology Assistance Animals Assistive Technology – Equipment, Medical Supplies and Consumables Business and Industry Carer Support Groups Churches and Faith-based Centres Community Centres, Groups and Programs Community Support Counselling, Mental Health and Wellbeing Services Culturally and Linguistically Diverse/Multicultural Information and Services Disability Employment Disability Peak Bodies Disability Plan Managers and Support Coordinators Disability Services and Supports Domestic and Family Violence Services Drug and Alcohol Related Services Early Childhood Services Including Early Learning and Resources Education Including Before and After School Care and Higher Education Services Emergency Services Environment, Land, Water and Animal Welfare Financial Services General Health Services Including General Practitioners, Medical Centres and Paediatricians Hearing Related Services Including Audiology Housing Services Justice, Rights and the Law LGBTIQ+ Services
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Waste Committee 21 October 2009
    1 WATER AND WASTE COMMITTEE 1 21 OCTOBER 2009 WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND, PORT DOUGLAS/MOSSMAN WATER SUPPLY SCHEME Eric Zesers : 24/22/212-03: #2339446 RECOMMENDATION: That Council notes the report. INTRODUCTION: The water supply for Mossman, Port Douglas, Craiglie, Mowbray, Newell Beach, Cooya Beach and Cassowary is sourced directly from Rex Creek which is a tributary of the Mossman River. Due to unprecedented dry conditions, water levels in Rex Creek have fallen to levels that have required the following actions be undertaken: • Implementation of Level 1 Water restrictions for Port Douglas, Mossman, Craiglie, Mowbray, Newell Beach, Cooya Beach and Cassowary, on 2 October 2009. • Progression to Level 2 Water Restrictions on 12 October 2009. • Application to the Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) for a temporary emergency extraction permit for water from the Mossman River. • Application to DERM for an internal review of the original decision relating to the licence limit to extract water from Rex Creek to supply water to Port Douglas and Mossman. • Application to DERM to exceed license limits for water extraction during periods of low flow. This report provides details of the above matters. BACKGROUND: The winter of 2009 has seen the lowest winter rainfall on record at the Low Isles Light House – 25.7 mm (average is 136.4 mm) and at the Cairns Airport – 17.2 mm (average is 102mm). As a result of the unprecedented dry conditions, run of river water supplies such as Rex Creek can also be expected to reach record lows or potentially could dry up completely.
    [Show full text]
  • Daintreep Daintreepedia
    Generously Sponsored by Daintreep June 2019 Daintreepedia Table of Contents Community Facilities.........................................................................................................................................3 Ferry..................................................................................................................................................................5 Distances – driving (approx.)............................................................................................................................7 Dining Out / Groceries / Picnic Areas...............................................................................................................8 Tours & Activities............................................................................................................................................11 Walks...............................................................................................................................................................16 Swimming........................................................................................................................................................17 Arts & Crafts....................................................................................................................................................18 Special Needs.................................................................................................................................................19 Accommodation..............................................................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]