UC Berkeley Physics |

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UC Berkeley Physics | Fall 2011 @BERKELEY INSIDE Calcium Qubits–Trapping Ions for Quantum Computing Duality and the Promise of String Theory Matter of Wonder Physics 111 Advanced Lab– Real-World Hands-On Physics for Undergraduates Undergraduate and Graduate News Alumni News and more! Cover: Top left, Professor Bob Jacobsen with student Guillermo Fong (p.11) and Alan Kubey’s sleep- directed alarm system eyeglass frames (p.13 ; Nobel ) top right, Physics at Berkeley 2011 Prize winner Saul Perlmutter Published annually by the (p.14); center, M.C. Escher Department of Physics Verbum 1942 (p.7) and Mina Aganagic with graduate student Frances Hellman: Chair Claudia Lopez: Kevin Schaeffer (p.6); bottom Director Carol Dudley: center, Sketch of two ions trapped Assistant Director below a wire which studies how Maria Hjelm, Development Officer quantum information can be Devi Mathieu: Editor, Senior Writer transmitted (p.5); bottom left, Tom Colton: Photography Sketch of a graphene-based Meg Coughlin: Design optical modulator (p.9) Department of Physics 366 Le Conte Hall #7300 University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-7300 Copyright 2011 by The Regents of the University of California FEATURES Table of Contents 4 Calcium Qubits–Trapping Ions for Quantum Computing A Berkeley physicist leads the way in quantum information science Assistant professor Hartmut Häffner’s inventive approaches to understanding and controlling quantum phenomena are bringing quantum computing closer to reality. 6 Duality and the Promise of String Theory Berkeley physicist Mina Aganagic probes synergies between string theory and mathematics Associate professor in math as well as physics, Aganagic’s expertise as a theorist opens up new avenues of inquiry in both fields. 8 Matter of Wonder Optical spectroscopy reveals graphene’s extraordinary properties Through novel experimental methods, assistant professor Feng Wang is making huge strides in understanding a material with unsurpassed potential for super-fast, super-small electronics. 11 Physics 111 Advanced Lab–Real-World Hands-On Physics for Undergraduates The Physics 111 course, required of every physics major, has become a lynchpin in the well-rounded physics education Berkeley offers its undergraduates. DEPARTMENTS 2 Notes from the Chair 14 Department News 25 Physics in the Media 31 Undergraduate Affairs 34 Graduate Affairs 39 Alumni Affairs NOTES FROM THE CHAIR October 5, 2011 DEAR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS, hat a perfect day to write this state budget shortfalls, tuition increases, and operating Wletter! Just yesterday, efficiencies affect us deeply, they should not eclipse all our department celebrated–with of the positive news that comes out of Cal and the champagne, standing ovations, and Department of Physics on a daily basis. loud cheers–the news that professor Physics has had yet another great year, filled with FRANCES HELLMAN Saul Perlmutter has received the remarkable discoveries and a new faculty hire–Gabriel 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics. The award is for the discovery Orebi Gann, a particle/nuclear experimentalist special- “of the accelerating expansion of the Universe through izing in neutrino physics–as well as searches for new observations of distant supernovae”. For more details on faculty in condensed matter theory, astrophysics experi- the award, turn to page 14. ment, biophysics theory, and quantum materials. Perlmutter, along with the other researchers who We’ve also had some successful fundraising share the prize, has caused all of us to view the universe, campaigns, including the Charles H. Townes Graduate its expansion, and its fate in radically new ways. The source Fellowship, which is ahead of schedule and nearly com- of the mysterious “dark energy”, a term coined to explain pletely funded. And our $1.5 million campaign for the this accelerating expansion, is currently generating Physics 111 Advanced Lab includes a $500,000 match approximately one theory paper every three days, and from the Chancellor. has had tens of millions of hits on Google. Perlmutter, along with the other researchers who Perlmutter’s research and Nobel Prize are testaments share the prize, has caused all of us to view the to the fact that the University of California, Berkeley and universe, its expansion, and its fate in radically the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory are great new ways. partners. Together they provide an incredible place to do paradigm-shifting research. THE NEXT TEN YEARS As Chancellor Birgeneau said, “One of the great Acknowledging the accomplishments of the past year aspects of Saul, of course, is that he’s a great researcher, leads me into planning the next 10 years for this depart- but he’s also a great teacher. And I, like all of you, feel ment. We have just started our decadal review, an academic blessed to have colleagues like Saul who cannot be bought tradition in which all aspects of the department are by rich, private universities.” To this I add “and a great assessed by both internal and external reviewers. “What colleague whom I feel privileged to know.” opportunities exist and what challenges face us in making MORE GOOD NEWS this department the best in the world?” is the question Exciting and happy news is most welcome, especially that frames this assessment. While the recent ranking when the hum of media coverage about UC’s precarious from the National Research Council suggests that we funding situation is the norm. While the realities of already are one of the top programs in the world, we know better than to rest on those laurels. 2 PHYSICS AT BERKELEY/FALL 2011 So, we will be looking at all sectors of the Department major, this course requires constant reassessment in order of Physics: research, teaching, students, staff, alumni, to stay current with modern times and keep up with state- facilities, and space. Over the past two years, the faculty of-the-art experiments. This is where students apply has made a big effort to consider the most exciting and their primarily classroom-based knowledge of physics to significant research directions for the department–in real-life experiments, get their hands dirty by making other words, defining the intellectual agenda. The prior- experiments work, design and create their own projects, ities of the department, in a very general sense, are and figure out that equations are not just mathematical determined by this agenda. abstractions but represent physical, measurable properties. At the heart of our strategic plan is attracting the For many students, the Advanced Lab sequence best young faculty in the burgeoning fields of physics, offers their first exposure to a wide variety of experiments, ranging from experimental astrophysics, particle physics, and it is in the Advanced Lab where many discover their and biophysics, to condensed matter physics and atomic, passion for physics. For more details, read the article molecular and optical (AMO) physics. And while strate- that begins on page 11. gically-determined research areas are important, we will State funding for this class has gradually evaporated, always keep our eyes open for excellent candidates who and we are now embarking on a campaign to add new may take us in unanticipated directions. experiments and make enhancements to the rooms, Other focus areas for the decadal review are, of desks, and learning areas. Chancellor Birgeneau has put course, teaching and students. Along with attracting the up a $500,000 match for this campaign, and we are best faculty, we must continue to attract the best graduate hoping to raise $1.5 million to make these significant and undergraduate students to the department. Endowed changes, all in line with the forward-looking decadal graduate student fellowships are key to the former, a review taking place right now. strong major program to the latter, and great research As a part of the decadal review, faculty , staff, and opportunities apply to both. students are also considering other areas of priority. I am excited to see where this review takes us and how we NEW APPROACHES TO THE PHYSICS MAJOR can make this department, YOUR department, even better. We have surveyed our graduate and undergraduate Nobel Prizes are one way to tell us that UC Berkeley’s students and learned that there is a need and desire for Department of Physics is thriving, and I consider it a more electives and a more diverse approach to the phys- great privilege as Chair to ensure that we continue to do ics major. How do we address these wishes while main- so, always aiming to be the best. ■ taining our tried and true classes and teaching methods? The Physics 111 Advanced Lab, both the Experimentation Frances Hellman has been a member of the physics faculty and Instrumentation sections, is a perfect example. A since 2004, and was named Chair in 2007. Her research is great Berkeley tradition, and the “capstone” class for the in experimental condensed matter and materials physics. 3 PHYSICS AT BERKELEY/FALL 2011 A Berkeley physicist leads the way in Calcium Qubits quantum information T RAPPING IONS FOR QUANTUM COMPUTING science would reach the point of storing information in single atoms.” At that scale, quantum effects take over and classical algo- rithms no longer work. New technologies will be required. A vast increase in the speed and volume of computa- tion and data storage could be achieved using quantum mechanical systems for information processing. Classical computer bits exist in either of two states, 1 or 0. Qubits, on the other hand, can exist in more than one state at a time. This
Recommended publications
  • The Nature Index Journals
    The Nature Index journals The current 12-month window on natureindex.com includes data from 57,681 primary research articles from the following science journals: Advanced Materials (1028 articles) American Journal of Human Genetics (173 articles) Analytical Chemistry (1633 articles) Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2709 articles) Applied Physics Letters (3609 articles) Astronomy & Astrophysics (1780 articles) Cancer Cell (109 articles) Cell (380 articles) Cell Host & Microbe (95 articles) Cell Metabolism (137 articles) Cell Stem Cell (100 articles) Chemical Communications (4389 articles) Chemical Science (995 articles) Current Biology (440 articles) Developmental Cell (204 articles) Earth and Planetary Science Letters (608 articles) Ecology (259 articles) Ecology Letters (120 articles) European Physical Journal C (588 articles) Genes & Development (193 articles) Genome Research (184 articles) Geology (270 articles) Immunity (159 articles) Inorganic Chemistry (1345 articles) Journal of Biological Chemistry (2639 articles) Journal of Cell Biology (229 articles) Journal of Clinical Investigation (298 articles) Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (829 articles) Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (493 articles) Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (520 articles) Journal of High Energy Physics (2142 articles) Journal of Neuroscience (1337 articles) Journal of the American Chemical Society (2384 articles) Molecular Cell (302 articles) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2946 articles) Nano Letters
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman of the Opening Session
    The Universe had (probably) an origin: on singularity theorems & quantum fluctuations Emilio Elizalde ICE/CSIC & IEEC Campus UAB, Barcelona Cosmology and the Quantum Vacuum III, Benasque, Sep 4-10, 2016 Some facts (a few rather surprising...) • Adam Riess, NP 2011, at Starmus (Tenerife), about Hubble: • “Hubble obtained the distances and redshifts of distant nebulae…” • “Hubble discovered that the Universe was expanding…” • No mention to Vesto Slipher, an extraordinary astronomer • Brian Schmidt, NP 2011, at Starmus (Tenerife) & Lisa Randall, Harvard U, in Barcelona, about Einstein: SHOES- • “Einstein was the first to think about the possibility of a ‘dark energy’…” Supernovae • No mention to Fritz Zwicky, another extraordinary astronomer • Fritz Zwicky discovered dark matter in the early 1930s while studying how galaxies move within the Coma Cluster • He was also the first to postulate and use nebulae as gravitational lenses (1937) • How easily* brilliant astronomers get dismissed • How easily* scientific myths arise *in few decades How did the “Big Bang” get its name ? http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/space/universe/scientists/fred_hoyle • Sir Fred Hoyle (1915–2001) English astronomer noted primarily for the theory of stellar nucleosynthesis (1946,54 groundbreaking papers) • Work on Britain's radar project with Hermann Bondi and Thomas Gold • William Fowler NP’83: “The concept of nucleosynthesis in stars was first established by Hoyle in 1946” • He found the idea universe had a beginning to be pseudoscience, also arguments for a creator, “…for it's an irrational process, and can't be described in scientific terms”; “…belief in the first page of Genesis” • Hoyle-Gold-Bondi 1948 steady state theory, “creation or C-field” • BBC radio's Third Programme broadcast on 28 Mar 1949: “… for this to happen you would need such a Big Bang!” Thus: Big Bang = Impossible blow!! But now: Big Bang ≈ Inflation ! • Same underlying physics as in steady state theory, “creation or C-field” • Richard C.
    [Show full text]
  • Saul Perlmutter Receives Nobel Prize in Physics 27 October 2011
    Saul Perlmutter receives Nobel Prize in physics 27 October 2011 wonderful that the Nobel Prize is being awarded for results which reflect humanity's long quest to understand our world and how we got here. The ideas and discoveries that led to our ability to measure the expansion history of the universe have a truly international heritage, with key contributions from almost every continent and culture. And quite appropriately, our result - the acceleration of the universe - was the product of two teams of scientists from around the world. These are the kinds of discoveries that the whole world can feel a part of and celebrate, as humanity advances its knowledge of our universe." Saul Perlmutter addresses reporters and Berkeley Lab "I offer my congratulations to Dr. Perlmutter and the staff at a press conference on the morning of October 4 entire Berkeley Lab team for their extraordinary following the announcement of his Nobel Prize in contributions to science, which are being Physics. Credit: Roy Kaltschmidt, Lawrence Berkeley recognized with the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics," National Laboratory said Energy Secretary Steven Chu, former director of Berkeley Lab and himself a winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1997. "His groundbreaking work showed us that the expansion of the universe is Saul Perlmutter, an astrophysicist at the U.S. actually speeding up rather than slowing down. Dr. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley Perlmutter's award is another reminder of the National Laboratory and a professor of physics at incredible talent and world-leading expertise the University of California at Berkeley, has won America has at our National Laboratories.
    [Show full text]
  • A Time of Great Growth
    Newsletter | Spring 2019 A Time of Great Growth Heartfelt greetings from the UC Riverside Department of Physics and Astronomy. This is our annual newsletter, sent out each Spring to stay connected with our former students, retired faculty, and friends in the wider community. The Department continues to grow, not merely in size but also in stature and reputation. For the 2018-2019 academic year, we were pleased to welcome two new faculty: Professors Thomas Kuhlman and Barry Barish. Professor Kuhlman was previously on the faculty at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He joins our efforts in the emerging field of biophysics. His research lies in the quantitative imaging and theoretical modeling of biological systems. He works on genome dynamics, quantification of the activity of transposable elements in living cells, and applications to the engineering of genome editing. Professor Barry Barish, who joins us from Caltech, is the winner of the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics. He brings great prestige to our Department. Along with Professor Richard Schrock of the Department of Chemistry, who also joined UCR in 2018, UCR now has two Nobel Prize winners on its faculty. Professor Barish is an expert on the detection and physics of gravitational waves. He has been one of the key figures in the conception, construction, and operation of the LIGO detector, where gravitational waves were first discovered in 2015, and which led to his Nobel Prize. He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the winner of many other prestigious awards. The discovery of gravitational waves is one of the most exciting developments in physics so far this century.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Universe Made Of? How Old Is the Universe?
    What is the Universe made of? How old is it? Charles H. Lineweaver University of New South Wales ABSTRACT For the past 15 years most astronomers have assumed that 95% of the Universe was in some mysterious form of cold dark matter. They also assumed that the cosmo- logical constant, ΩΛ, was Einstein’s biggest blunder and could be ignored. However, recent measurements of the cosmic microwave background combined with other cos- mological observations strongly suggest that 75% of the Universe is made of cosmo- logical constant (vacuum energy), while only 20% is made of non-baryonic cold dark matter. Normal baryonic matter, the stuff most physicists study, makes up about 5% of the Universe. If these results are correct, an unknown 75% of the Universe has been identified. Estimates of the age of the Universe depend upon what it is made of. Thus, our new inventory gives us a new age for the Universe: 13.4 ± 1.6 Gyr. “The history of cosmology shows us that in every age devout people believe that they have at last discovered the true nature of the Universe.” (E. Harrison in Cosmology: The Science of the Universe 1981) 1 Progress A few decades ago cosmology was laughed at for being the only science with no data. Cosmology was theory-rich but data-poor. It attracted armchair enthusiasts spouting speculations without data to test them. It was the only science where the errors could be kept in the exponents – where you could set the speed of light c =1, not for dimensionless convenience, but because the observations were so poor that it didn’t matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates Endorse Joe Biden
    Nobel Laureates endorse Joe Biden 81 American Nobel Laureates in Physics, Chemistry, and Medicine have signed this letter to express their support for former Vice President Joe Biden in the 2020 election for President of the United States. At no time in our nation’s history has there been a greater need for our leaders to appreciate the value of science in formulating public policy. During his long record of public service, Joe Biden has consistently demonstrated his willingness to listen to experts, his understanding of the value of international collaboration in research, and his respect for the contribution that immigrants make to the intellectual life of our country. As American citizens and as scientists, we wholeheartedly endorse Joe Biden for President. Name Category Prize Year Peter Agre Chemistry 2003 Sidney Altman Chemistry 1989 Frances H. Arnold Chemistry 2018 Paul Berg Chemistry 1980 Thomas R. Cech Chemistry 1989 Martin Chalfie Chemistry 2008 Elias James Corey Chemistry 1990 Joachim Frank Chemistry 2017 Walter Gilbert Chemistry 1980 John B. Goodenough Chemistry 2019 Alan Heeger Chemistry 2000 Dudley R. Herschbach Chemistry 1986 Roald Hoffmann Chemistry 1981 Brian K. Kobilka Chemistry 2012 Roger D. Kornberg Chemistry 2006 Robert J. Lefkowitz Chemistry 2012 Roderick MacKinnon Chemistry 2003 Paul L. Modrich Chemistry 2015 William E. Moerner Chemistry 2014 Mario J. Molina Chemistry 1995 Richard R. Schrock Chemistry 2005 K. Barry Sharpless Chemistry 2001 Sir James Fraser Stoddart Chemistry 2016 M. Stanley Whittingham Chemistry 2019 James P. Allison Medicine 2018 Richard Axel Medicine 2004 David Baltimore Medicine 1975 J. Michael Bishop Medicine 1989 Elizabeth H. Blackburn Medicine 2009 Michael S.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter and Dark Energy
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 8 Original Research The building blocks of the universe Author: I review the state of knowledge of the composition of the universe for a non-specialist audience. 1,2 Anslyn J. John The universe is built up of four components. These are radiation, baryonic (ordinary) matter, Affiliation: dark matter and dark energy. In this article, a quick outline of the theory of Big Bang 1Department of Physics, nucleosynthesis is presented, and the origin of the elements is explained. Cosmology requires Faculty of Science, the presence of dark matter, which forms most of the mass of the universe, and dark energy, Stellenbosch University, which drives the acceleration of the expansion. The dark sector is motivated, and possible Stellenbosch, South Africa explanations are stated. 2National Institute for Contribution: As part of this special collection on building blocks, the building blocks of the Theoretical and Computational Sciences universe are discussed and unsolved problems and proposed solutions are highlighted. (NITheCS), South Africa Keywords: cosmology; nucleosynthesis; dark matter; dark energy; cosmological constant; Corresponding author: general relativity; galaxies; particle physics. Anslyn John, [email protected] Dates: Introduction Received: 10 May 2021 Cosmology is the scientific study of the origin and development of the universe on the largest Accepted: 12 July 2021 Published: 25 Aug. 2021 scales. Today, the standard model of cosmology is a cornerstone of physics and astronomy. This is attested to by the award of four Nobel Prizes for research in cosmology. These awards, in How to cite this article: chronological order, are: John, A.J., 2021, ‘The building blocks of the universe’, 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ripples in Spacetime
    editorial Ripples in spacetime The 2017 Nobel prize in Physics has been awarded to Rainer Weiss, Barry C. Barish and Kip S. Thorne “for decisive contributions to the LIGO detector and the observation of gravitational waves”. It is, frankly, difficult to find something original to say about the detection of gravitational waves that hasn’t been said already. The technological feat of measuring fluctuations in the fabric of spacetime less than one-thousandth the width of an atomic nucleus is quite simply astonishing. The scientific achievement represented by the confirmation of a century-old prediction by Albert Einstein is unique. And the collaborative effort that made the discovery possible — the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) — is inspiring. Adapted from Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), under Creative Commons Licence. Rainer Weiss and Kip Thorne were, along with the late Ronald Drever, founders of the project that eventually became known Barry Barish, who was the director Last month we received a spectacular as LIGO. In the 1960s, Thorne, a black hole of LIGO from 1997 to 2005, is widely demonstration that talk of a new era expert, had come to believe that his objects of credited with transforming it into a ‘big of gravitational astronomy was no interest should be detectable as gravitational physics’ collaboration, and providing the exaggeration. Cued by detections at LIGO waves. Separately, and inspired by previous organizational structure required to ensure and Virgo, an interferometer based in Pisa, proposals, Weiss came up with the first it worked. Of course, the passion, skill and Italy, more than 70 teams of researchers calculations detailing how an interferometer dedication of the thousand or so scientists working at different telescopes around could be used to detect them in 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Peeling of Impacting Droplets
    LETTERS PUBLISHED ONLINE: 11 SEPTEMBER 2017 | DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS4252 Self-peeling of impacting droplets Jolet de Ruiter†, Dan Soto† and Kripa K. Varanasi* Whether an impacting droplet1 sticks or not to a solid formation, 10 µs, is much faster than the typical time for the droplet surface has been conventionally controlled by functionalizing to completely crash22, 2R=v ∼1ms. These observations suggest that the target surface2–8 or by using additives in the drop9,10. the number of ridges is set by a local competition between heat Here we report on an unexpected self-peeling phenomenon extraction—leading to solidification—and fluid motion—opposing that can happen even on smooth untreated surfaces by it through local shear, mixing, and convection (see first stage of taking advantage of the solidification of the impacting drop sketch in Fig. 2c). We propose that at short timescales (<1 ms, and the thermal properties of the substrate. We control top row sketch of Fig. 2c), while the contact line of molten tin this phenomenon by tuning the coupling of the short- spreads outwards, a thin liquid layer in the immediate vicinity of timescale fluid dynamics—leading to interfacial defects upon the surface cools down until it forms a solid crust. At that moment, local freezing—and the longer-timescale thermo-mechanical the contact line pins, while the liquid above keeps spreading on a stresses—leading to global deformation. We establish a regime thin air film squeezed underneath. Upon renewed touchdown of map that predicts whether a molten metal drop impacting the liquid, a small air ridge remains trapped, forming the above- onto a colder substrate11–14 will bounce, stick or self-peel.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Lasers at Stanford Group
    Lasers at 50: Byer The History of Lasers at Stanford Group Robert L. Byer Applied Physics Stanford University [email protected] Abstract In the fifty years since the demonstration of the laser, coherent light has changed the way we work, communicate and play. The generation and control of light is critical for meeting important challenges of the 21st century from fundamental science to the generation of energy. A look back at the early days of the laser at Stanford will be contrasted to the recent breakthroughs in solid state lasers and the applications to fundamental science of gravitational wave detection, remote sensing, and laser induced fusion for energy production. Stanford Historical Society 34th Annual Meeting & Reception May 25, 2010 The History of Lasers at Stanford May 25 2010 Cubberley Auditorium, Staford Byer California – Leader in advanced telescopes for astronomy Group Lick 36 inch refractor The Mount Wilson 100 inch The Palomar 200 inch 1888 1917 1948 The History of Lasers at Stanford May 25 2010 Cubberley Auditorium, Staford From Maser to Laser – stimulated emission at optical frequencies Byer proposed in 1958 – A. Schawlow and C. H. Townes Group The History of Lasers at Stanford May 25 2010 Cubberley Auditorium, Staford Early advances in lasers --- Byer 2009 a Special Year Group Concept of Optical Maser Schawlow & Townes 1958 Ruby Laser Ted Maiman 1960 Nobel Prize awarded in 1964 Townes, Prokhorov and Basov Hg+ Ion Laser Earl Bell 1965 Argon Ion Laser Bill Bridges Tunable cw parametric Laser Harris 1968 Diode bar 1Watt
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter
    Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter March 2016 Volume 5 • Number 1 worldscinet.com/appn Takaaki Kajita 2015 Physics Nobel Laureate published by Institute of Advanced Studies, Nanyang Technological University (IAS@NTU) and South East Asia Theoretical Physics Association (SEATPA) South East Asia Theoretical Physics Association Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter March 2016 • Volume 5 • Number 1 A publication of the IAS@NTU Singapore and SEATPA Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter publishes articles reporting frontier discoveries in EDITORIAL physics, research highlights, and news to facilitate interaction, collaboration and 3 cooperation among physicists in Asia Pacific physics community. PEOPLE Editor-in-Chief 4 “Observing the Distant Supernova” — Interview with Kok Khoo Phua Nobel Laureate Prof Brian Schmidt Associate Editor-in-Chief “Discovering the W and Z Bosons” — Interview with Swee Cheng Lim Nobel Laureate Prof Carlo Rubbia SEATPA Committee Christopher C Bernido Phil Chan Leong Chuan Kwek Choy Heng Lai Swee Cheng Lim Ren Bao Liu Hwee Boon Low Anh Ký Nguyên Choo Hiap Oh OPINION AND COMMENTARY Kok Khoo Phua 10 China’s Great Scientific Leap Forward: Completion of a Roh Suan Tung Preecha Yupapin planned ‘Great Collider’ would transform particle physics Hishamuddin Zainuddin Freddy Zen Editorial Team NEWS Sen Mu 12 CityU’s Institute for Advanced Study will Champion Bold New Han Sun Chi Xiong Research Initiatives Case made for 'Ninth Planet' Graphic Designers Chuan Ming Loo Erin Ong Cover Photo: "Takaaki Kajita 5171- 2015" by Bengt Nyman - Own work.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Wrong
    Einstein’s wrong way: from STR to GTR Adrian Ferent I discovered a new Gravitation theory which breaks the wall of Planck scale! Abstract My Nobel Prize - Discoveries “Starting from STR, it is not possible to find a Quantum Gravity theory” Adrian Ferent “Einstein was on the wrong way: from STR to GTR” Adrian Ferent “Starting from STR, Einstein was not able to explain Gravitation” Adrian Ferent “Starting from STR, Einstein was not able to explain Gravitation, he calculated Gravitation” Adrian Ferent “Einstein's equivalence principle is wrong because the gravitational force experienced locally is caused by a negative energy, gravitons energy and the force experienced by an observer in a non-inertial (accelerated) frame of reference is caused by a positive energy.” Adrian Ferent “Because Einstein's equivalence principle is wrong, Einstein’s gravitation theory is wrong.” Adrian Ferent “Because Einstein’s gravitation theory is wrong, LQG, String theory… are wrong theories” Adrian Ferent “Einstein bent the space, Ferent unbent the space” Adrian Ferent 1 “Einstein bent the time, Ferent unbent the time” Adrian Ferent “I am the first who Quantized the Gravitational Field!” Adrian Ferent “I quantized the gravitational field with gravitons” Adrian Ferent “Gravitational field is a discrete function” Adrian Ferent “Gravitational waves are carried by gravitons” Adrian Ferent In STR and GTR there are continuous functions. This is another proof that LIGO is a fraud. The 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded for a project, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) not for a scientific discovery; they did not detect anything because Einstein’s gravitational waves do not exist.
    [Show full text]