DOCSLIB.ORG

This Paper Is the Third of a Series Dealing with Meteor Observations at Adelaide with the 27 Mc/S C.W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Paper Is the Third of a Series Dealing with Meteor Observations at Adelaide with the 27 Mc/S C.W THE INCIDENCE OF METEOR PARTICLES UPON THE EARTH By A. A. WEISS· [Manuscript received May 10, 1957] Summary R,adio echo rates for both shower and sporadic meteors, measured at Adelaide with the 27 Mcls C.W. equipment, are applied to the calculation of the incident flux of meteors above limiting brightnesses in the range M R < + 7·5. On the hypothesis of a strongly velocity.dependent ionizing probability, reached after a critical evaluation of the observational material, the meteor flux above prescribed limiting meteor particle masses, and the space densities of meteor particles, are also calculated. These fluxes and densities agree reasonably well with independent evaluations from visual meteor rates. The amount of meteoric matter falling on the whole Earth per day within particle mass limits 10-1 to 10-& g, for sporadic meteors and some showers, is also estimated. I. INTRODUCTION This paper is the third of a series dealing with meteor observations at Adelaide with the 27 Mc/s C.W. equipment. Paper I (Weiss 1957a) discusses the sporadic background. Paper II (Weiss 1957b) is concerned with shower meteors and presents an overall picture of the meteor activity. The present paper, based on the data of the preceding two, deals with the influx of meteor particles over the whole surface of the Earth, and with their density in space. Meteors are counted by radio equipments in terms of the line density or the equivalent radio brightness-an equipment will detect in a given direction all meteors which satisfy the geometrical conditions for specular reflection and whose line densities exceed the threshold appropriate to the equipment. Similarly, visual observers record all meteors above the visual threshold brightness which fall within a prescribed field of view. These brightness counts are not necessarily simply related to the total influx of meteors above a prescribed radio brightness (because of the influence of aerial aperture and polar diagram, and trail aspect) or a prescribed visual brightness (visual aperture and subjective factors), nor to the total influx of meteors above a prescribed limiting mass. Several estimates have been made (Kaiser -1955, p. 119; Levin 1955; Hawkins 1956b; Davies 1957) of the number of meteor particles, above a given limiting brightness,-radio or visual, falling on the whole Earth. Meteor brightness is directly measurable, and the above estimates of the numbers of incident particles and the flux found from the Adelaide counts are reasonably concordant. The extension of these results to the determination of the influx of meteors above a prescribed limiting mass, or of the density of meteor particles iIi space, can * Division of Radiophysics, C.S.I.R.O., at Department of Physics, University of Adelaide. 398 A. A. WEISS only be made if the ionizing probability and the luminous efficiency, i.e. the efficiencies of production of free electrons and radiation, are known. This further analysis has been made for the visual counts by Levin, who concluded that the maximum particle densities in shower orbits are considerably lower than the density of sporadic meteors. Although the question of the dependence of ionizing probability upon meteor velocity is not fully resolved, there is a growing body of evidence which suggests that this parameter is strongly dependent on meteor velocity. Interpretation of the Adelaide r:adio counts on this basis leads to the conclusion already reached by Levin from the visual data: above the liJniting mass corresponding to the visual threshold brightness for a meteor with a velocity of 60 km sec--:!, the sporadic meteor density is higher than th:tt in the most dense portions of all the major day-time and iught-time meteor streams. This agreement is, in itself, rather convincing evidence for the correctness of the forms of velocity dependence, weak for luminous efficiency and strong for ionizing probability, which emerge from the discussion of the relevant observa­ tional material in Section V. II. THE BRIGHTNESS AND MASS DISTRIBUTIONS The maximum value of the line density of electrons in the meteor trail is IXmax.~(4/9!J.H)m~(v) cos X, .............. (1) where X is the zenith angle of the-radiant, !J. the atomic weight of the (average) meteor atom, H the atmospheric scale height, and ~(v) the ionizing probability, i.e. the probability that a single evaporated meteor atom will produce a free electron. The analogous parameteI' in visual detection is the luminous intensity 1. According to Levin (1955) the brightness estimated by a visual observer may characterize some average luminous intensity loc(Imax.)z, !<x<1. However, Browne et al. (1956) find x,...."l and it is sufficient to put x=1. Then the maximum value of the luminous intensity is (2) where T(V) is the luminous efficiency, i.e. the fraction of the total energy dissipated which is emitted as visible radiation. The velocity-dependence of the parameters ~ and 't" is examined in Section V. In the meantime, attention may be drawn to the factor v3 which already appears in (2). The visual and radio brightnesses are now, as usual, taken to be M v=const. -2·5 loglOImax_ M R = const. -2 ·5 loglolXmax. The frequency distribution of both radio and visual magnitudes will be assumed to have the form vMocaM , ••••••••••••••••••••.•.• (3) INCIDENCE OF METEOR PARTICLES UPON THE EARTH 399 where v~M is the incident flux of meteors with magnitudes between M and M +dM. The corresponding flux of meteors with masses between m and m +dm is then assumed to be vmdm ocm -'dm, .................... (4) where8=1+2·510g10a=1+x, if X=2·510g10a. Detailed investigations of the structures of several showers by Browne et al. indicate that the distributions (3) and (4) do not hold exactly over extended ranges of brightness and mass. They do, however, form a useful first approxi­ mation, and in the present paper mass distributions are, with one exception, discussed with 8=constant over the range of interest. Values of 8 adopted for showers are listed in Table 1. For sporadic meteors 8=2 ·0. III. SHOWER METEOR FLUX ABOVE A PRESCRIBED RADIO BRIGHTNESS From equations (1) and (4), assuming ~ to be independent of the mass m, the incident flux of meteors, across unit area of a plane. normal to the meteor paths, with zenithal line densities greater than ocz=(Xa/cos X, is 0(ocz }={O/(8-1)}oc!-B. .••............ (5) The zenithal line density is the maximum number of electrons per unit length which the meteor would produce if it travelled vertically downwards. (Xa is the minimum detectable line density in the direction 6, which is the direction of the reflection point of the meteor trail in the echo plane, following the geometry and notation of Kaiser (1955, p.1l9). From (5) it follows that 0(oco/cos X)=0(oco/cos X)(OCo/(Xa)B-l, where 0C0 is the minimum detectable line density on the axis of the aerial beam, which for the Adelaide equipment is directed to the zenith. Kaiser (loc. cit.) has given expressions for the total radio echo rate in terms of the equipment geometry and parameters, and the incident flux. Shower fluxes have been computed using these expressions and the radio counts at zenith angles X=70° given in paper II. At this zenith angle collection is confined to the major lobe; the limiting sensitivity contours are given in paper I. A horizontal collecting surface for meteors, at a height of 90 km, has been assumed; this introduces an error of less than 1 per cent. The further approximation is mada that only short, decay type echoes are observed (oc<2 X 1012 cm-1); this is true over most of the major lobe. With these approximations, the echo rate integrated over the whole aperture of the major lobe is N x = 700 =0(3 ·5 X 1011) .15001(8), .......••••...•• (6a) 1(8)=:=(8-1·14)-1 I (OCo/(Xa),-l cos-26 d6. (6b) major lobe The integral (6b) is illustrated in Figure 1. For a given flux 0 the echo rate is evidently quite sensitive to the mass distribution within the stream. E ~ o o TABLE 1 SHOWER METEOR FLUXES AND STREAM DENSITIES --- Hourly Rates Fluxes above Fluxes above Observed Limiting Brightness Limiting Mass Stream Densities Shower Velocity Radio Visual (lon-2 sec-I) (km- 2 sec-I) (lon-3) v 8 x* Radio (lon sec-I) ------ Visual* 8(1012) 8(4·3) V(1012) I v(4'3) D(1012) D(4'3) -. J.B.R. A.W. X lOB X lOB X lOB X lOB X lOB X lOB Perseids · . 60 1·6 1·0 47 55 58 310 58 310 1·0 5·1 ~ Geminids · . 36 1·7 1·3 70 24 60 110 330 470 2500 13 68 ~ Quadrantids .. 40 1·8 1-0 92 40 78 220 290 760 7· 19 Arietids 38 2-5 - 61 24 100 1600 41 · . ~rn rn ~.Perseids · . 29 2·5 - 40 16 67 5200 180 2·0 81 1500 51 8.Aquarids · . 40 2·5 1·4 23 140 1600 41 2·0 150 780 20 1·75 150 500 13 7)-Aquarids · . 64 2·0 0·9 11 36 72 200 56 170 0·9 2·6 Orionids · . 66 2·5 1·5 14 10 86 56 49 37 0·7 0·6 2·0 95 1·0 I 65 - * After Levin. INCIDENCE OF METEOR PARTICLES UPON THE EARTH 401 Using (6) and the average echo rates at maximum. activity given in paper IIt the following fluxes are obtained: Geminids 0( IX) =3·6 X 102 IX-O. 7 km-2 sec-I June day-time showers =2·4 X 10I21X-I.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Meteor Shower Detection with Density-Based Clustering
    Meteor Shower Detection with Density-Based Clustering Glenn Sugar1*, Althea Moorhead2, Peter Brown3, and William Cooke2 1Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 2NASA Meteoroid Environment Office, Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, 35812 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Western Ontario, London N6A3K7, Canada *Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We present a new method to detect meteor showers using the Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise algorithm (DBSCAN; Ester et al. 1996). DBSCAN is a modern cluster detection algorithm that is well suited to the problem of extracting meteor showers from all-sky camera data because of its ability to efficiently extract clusters of different shapes and sizes from large datasets. We apply this shower detection algorithm on a dataset that contains 25,885 meteor trajectories and orbits obtained from the NASA All-Sky Fireball Network and the Southern Ontario Meteor Network (SOMN). Using a distance metric based on solar longitude, geocentric velocity, and Sun-centered ecliptic radiant, we find 25 strong cluster detections and 6 weak detections in the data, all of which are good matches to known showers. We include measurement errors in our analysis to quantify the reliability of cluster occurrence and the probability that each meteor belongs to a given cluster. We validate our method through false positive/negative analysis and with a comparison to an established shower detection algorithm. 1. Introduction A meteor shower and its stream is implicitly defined to be a group of meteoroids moving in similar orbits sharing a common parentage.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Contributions Astrophysics
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS to ASTROPHYSICS Number 14 Discrete Levels off Beginning Height off Meteors in Streams By A. F. Cook Number 15 Yet Another Stream Search Among 2401 Photographic Meteors By A. F. Cook, B.-A. Lindblad, B. G. Marsden, R. E. McCrosky, and A. Posen Smithsonian Institution Astrophysical Observatory Smithsonian Institution Press SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ASTROPHYSICS NUMBER 14 A. F. cook Discrete Levels of Beginning Height of Meteors in Streams SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS CITY OF WASHINGTON 1973 Publications of the Smithsonian Institution Astrophysical Observatory This series, Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics, was inaugurated in 1956 to provide a proper communication for the results of research conducted at the Astrophysical Observatory of the Smithsonian Institution. Its purpose is the "increase and diffusion of knowledge" in the field of astrophysics, with particular emphasis on problems of the sun, the earth, and the solar system. Its pages are open to a limited number of papers by other investigators with whom we have common interests. Another series, Annals of the Astrophysical Observatory, was started in 1900 by the Observa- tory's first director, Samuel P. Langley, and was published about every ten years. These quarto volumes, some of which are still available, record the history of the Observatory's researches and activities. The last volume (vol. 7) appeared in 1954. Many technical papers and volumes emanating from the Astrophysical Observatory have appeared in the Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections. Among these are Smithsonian Physical Tables, Smithsonian Meteorological Tables, and World Weather Records. Additional information concerning these publications can be obtained from the Smithsonian Institution Press, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 3D/Biela and the Andromedids: Fragmenting Versus Sublimating Comets P
    The Astronomical Journal, 134:1037 Y 1045, 2007 September # 2007. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. 3D/BIELA AND THE ANDROMEDIDS: FRAGMENTING VERSUS SUBLIMATING COMETS P. Jenniskens1 and J. Vaubaillon2 Received 2007 January 3; accepted 2007 April 22 ABSTRACT Comet 3D/Biela broke up in 1842/1843 and continued to disintegrate in the returns of 1846 and 1852. When meteor storms were observed in November of 1872 and 1885, it was surmised that those showers were the debris from that breakup. This could have come from one of two sources: (1) the initial separation of fragments near aphelion or (2) the continued disintegration of the fragments afterward. Alternatively, the meteoroids could simply have come from water vapor drag when the fragments approached perihelion (option 3). We investigated the source of the Andromedid storms by calculating the dynamical evolution of dust ejected in a normal manner by water vapor drag in the returns from 1703 to 1866, assuming that the comet would have remained similarly active over each return. In addition, we simulated the isotropic ejection of dust during the initial fragmentation event at aphelion in December of 1842. We conclude that option 2 is the most likely source of meteoroids encountered during the 1872 and 1885 storms, but this accounts for only a relatively small amount of mass lost in a typical comet breakup. Key words: comets: individual (3D/Biela) — meteors, meteoroids — minor planets, asteroids 1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE COMET AND ITS SHOWER Ever since Whipple (1951) showed that water vapor can ac- 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Echo Observations of Meteors in the Southern Hemisphere
    RADIO ECHO OBSERVATIONS OF METEORS IN THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE By A. A. WEISS* [Manuscript received September 20, 1954] Summary The results of a radio survey of meteor activity at Adelaide are presented. The radiants and activities of six major meteor showers (Geminids, day-time Arietids, ~-Perseids, a-Aquarids, Corona Australids, Orionids) have been measured by methods which are described, and the mass distributions in three of these showers are discussed. Seasonal and diurnal variations in the background activity of sporadic meteors are examined in relation to the radiation patterns of the aerial systems_ Height distribut.ions for meteors of three showers (Geminids, day-time Arietids, ~-Perseids) are given. Diurnal variations in the height distribution of sporadic meteors do not conform to those expected from the motion of the apex of the Earth's way. I. INTRODUCTION The successful application, at the Jodrell Bank Experimental Station of the University of Manchester, of radio echo techniques to the continuous monitoring of meteor activity in the northern hemisphere, prompted the initiation ()f a complementary survey in the southern hemisphere. Up to the time of (lommencement of this survey lists of southern hemisphere visual observations had been published by McIntosh and by Hoffmeister, and McIntosh (1935) had compiled" An Index to Southern Meteor Showers" which lists 320 radiants visible at mid-southern latitudes. These visual observations have since been supplemented by radio echo observations on the a-Aquarid shower by Hawkins and Almond (1952) and by Lindblad (1952). Although it is certain that all major southern night-time showers have been detected by the visual workers, the cover in the months September to March is not altogether satisfactory (McIntosh 1935).
    [Show full text]
  • Spectra and Physical Properties of Taurid Meteoroids
    Spectra and physical properties of Taurid meteoroids Pavol Matloviˇca, Juraj T´otha, Regina Rudawskab, Leonard Kornoˇsa aFaculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia bESA European Space Research and Technology Centre, Noordwijk, Netherlands Abstract Taurids are an extensive stream of particles produced by comet 2P/Encke, which can be observed mainly in October and November as a series of me- teor showers rich in bright fireballs. Several near-Earth asteroids have also been linked with the meteoroid complex, and recently the orbits of two car- bonaceous meteorites were proposed to be related to the stream, raising interesting questions about the origin of the complex and the composition of 2P/Encke. Our aim is to investigate the nature and diversity of Taurid mete- oroids by studying their spectral, orbital, and physical properties determined from video meteor observations. Here we analyze 33 Taurid meteor spectra captured during the predicted outburst in November 2015 by stations in Slo- vakia and Chile, including 14 multi-station observations for which the orbital elements, material strength parameters, dynamic pressures, and mineralog- ical densities were determined. It was found that while orbits of the 2015 Taurids show similarities with several associated asteroids, the obtained spec- tral and physical characteristics point towards cometary origin with highly heterogeneous content. Observed spectra exhibited large dispersion of iron content and significant Na intensity in all cases. The determined material strengths are typically cometary in the KB classification, while PE criterion is on average close to values characteristic for carbonaceous bodies. The studied meteoroids were found to break up under low dynamic pressures of 0.02 - 0.10 MPa, and were characterized by low mineralogical densities of 1.3 arXiv:1704.06482v1 [astro-ph.EP] 21 Apr 2017 - 2.5 g cm-3.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence and Altitude of the Non-Specular Long-Lived Meteor Trails During Meteor Showers at High Latitudes
    EGU2020-1543 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-1543 EGU General Assembly 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Occurrence and altitude of the non-specular long-lived meteor trails during meteor showers at high latitudes Alexander Kozlovsky1, Renata Lukianova2, and Mark Lester3 1University of Oulu, Sodankyla Geophysical Observatory, Sodankyla, Finland ([email protected]) 2Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK Meteoroids entering the Earth’s atmosphere produce ionized trails, which are detectable by radio sounding. Majority of such radar detections are the echoes from cylindrical ionized trails, which occur if the radar beam is perpendicular to the trail, i.e., the reflection is specular. Typically such echoes detected by VHF radars last less than one second. However, sometimes meteor radars (MR) observe unusually long-lived meteor echoes and these echoes are non-specular (LLNS echoes). The LLNS echoes last up to several tens of seconds and show highly variable amplitude of the radar return. The LLNS echoes are received from the non-field-aligned irregularities of ionization generated along trails of bright meteors and it is believed that key role in their generation belongs to the aerosol particles arising due to fragmentation and burning of large meteoroids. The occurrence and height distributions of LLNS are studied using MR observations at Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory (SGO, 67° 22' N, 26° 38' E, Finland) during 2008-2019. Two parameters are analyzed: the percentage and height distribution of LLNS echoes. These LLNS echoes constitute about 2% of all MR detections.
    [Show full text]
  • EPSC2017-270-2, 2017 European Planetary Science Congress 2017 Eeuropeapn Planetarsy Science Ccongress C Author(S) 2017
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 11, EPSC2017-270-2, 2017 European Planetary Science Congress 2017 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2017 GR Precession and Kozai Mechanism in Asteroid-Comet Continuum A. Sekhar (1,2), D. J. Asher (2), A. Morbidelli (3), S. C. Werner (1), J. Vaubaillon (4), G. Li (5) (1) Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway (2) Armagh Observatory and Planetarium, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, (3) Laboratoire Lagrange, Universite de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, CNRS, Observatoire de la Cote d’Azur, Nice, France (4) IMCCE Observatory of Paris, France (5) Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, United States ([email protected]) Abstract the eccentricity, inclination and argument of pericen- tre in Kozai cycles are closely correlated. In this work, 1. Introduction we find real examples of solar system bodies which show rapid enhancement in GR precession rates due Two well known phenomena associated with low peri- to Kozai-like oscillations and there are cases where helion distance bodies in orbital dynamics are general GR precession rate peaks to about 60 times that of the relativistic (GR) precession and Kozai oscillations. GR precession of Mercury thus showing the strength The accurate prediction of the perihelion shift [17] and complementary nature between these two dynam- of Mercury in accord with real observations is one of ical phenomena. Comet 96P/Machholz 1 stands as a the signicant triumphs of the general theory of relativ- unique example in many of these aspects especially ity [3]. Past works have looked into the GR precession because its orbital connection [10][11] with two sun- in perihelion in different types of solar system bod- grazing comet families (Marsden and Kracht) and low ies like planets, asteroids [14][13], comets [15][13] perihelion distance meteoroid streams like Daytime and meteoroid streams [4][12][5].
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Meteor Shower Calendar Edited by J¨Urgen Rendtel 1
    IMO INFO(2-19) 1 International Meteor Organization 2020 Meteor Shower Calendar edited by J¨urgen Rendtel 1 1 Introduction This is the thirtieth edition of the International Meteor Organization (IMO) Meteor Shower Calendar, a series which was started by Alastair McBeath. Over all the years, we want to draw the attention of observers to both regularly returning meteor showers and to events which may be possible according to model calculations. We may experience additional peaks and/or enhanced rates but also the observational evidence of no rate or density enhancement. The position of peaks constitutes further important information. All data may help to improve our knowledge about the numerous effects occurring between the meteoroid release from their parent object and the currently observable structure of the related streams. Hopefully, the Calendar continues to be a useful tool to plan your meteor observing activities during periods of high rates or periods of specific interest for projects or open issues which need good coverage and attention. Video meteor camera networks are collecting data throughout the year. Nevertheless, visual observations comprise an important data sample for many showers. Because visual observers are more affected by moonlit skies than video cameras, we consider the moonlight circumstances when describing the visibility of meteor showers. For the three strongest annual shower peaks in 2020 we find the first quarter Moon for the Quadrantids, a waning crescent Moon for the Perseids and new Moon for the Geminids. Conditions for the maxima of other well-known showers are good: the Lyrids are centred around new Moon, the Draconids occur close to the last quarter Moon and the Orionids as well as the Leonids see a crescent only in the evenings.
    [Show full text]
  • Specular Long-Lived Meteor Trails During Meteor Showers at High Latitudes
    Occurrence and altitude of the non- specular long-lived meteor trails during meteor showers at high latitudes EGU2020-1543 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-1543 Alexander Kozlovsky1, Renata Lukianova2, and Mark Lester3 (1) Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, Finland (2) Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia (3) University of Leicester, UK Abstract Meteoroids entering the Earth’s atmosphere produce ionized trails, which are detectable by radio sounding. Majority of such radar detections are the echoes froM cylindrical ionized trails, which occur if the radar beam is perpendicular to the trail, i.e., the reflection is specular. Typically such echoes detected by VHF radars last less than one second. However, soMetiMes Meteor radars (MR) observe unusually long-lived Meteor echoes and these echoes are non-specular (LLNS echoes). The LLNS echoes last up to several tens of seconds and show highly variable amplitude of the radar return. The LLNS echoes at high latitudes are received froM the non-field- aligned irregularities of ionization generated along trails of bright Meteors and it is believed that key role in their generation belongs to the aerosol particles arising due to fragMentation and burning of large Meteoroids. The occurrence and height distributions of LLNS are studied using MR observations at Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory (SGO, 67° 22' N, 26° 38' E, Finland) during 2008-2019. Two parameters are analyzed: the percentage and height distribution of LLNS echoes. These LLNS echoes constitute about 2% of all MR detections. However during certain Meteor showers (GeMinids, Perseids, Quadrantids, Arietids or/and DaytiMe ζ-Perseids, and Lyrids) the percentage of LLNS echoes is noticeably higher (about 10, 8, 7, 7, and 4%, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Craters and Airbursts
    Craters and Airbursts • Most asteroids and comets fragments explode in the air as fireballs or airbursts; only the largest ones make craters. • Evidence indicates that the YDB impact into the Canadian ice sheet made ice-walled craters that melted away long ago. • The YDB impact also possibly created rocky craters, most likely along the edge of the ice sheet in Canada or underwater in the oceans. • Our group is planning expeditions to search for impact evidence and hidden craters, for example to North Dakota, Montana, Quebec, and Nova Scotia. The following pages show what could happen during an impact NOTE: this website is a brief, non-technical introduction to the YDB impact hypothesis. For in-depth information, go to “Publications” to find links to detailed scientific papers. NAME OF SHOWER NAME OF SHOWER Alpha Aurigids Leo Minorids Meteor Showers Alpha Bootids Leonids Alpha Capricornids Librids Alpha Carinids Lyrids Comet impacts are common, Alpha Centaurids Monocerotids Alpha Crucids Mu Virginids but usually, they are harmless Alpha Cygnids Northern Delta Aquariids Alpha Hydrids Northern Iota Aquariids Alpha Monocerotids Northern Taurids Alpha Scorpiids October Arietids • Earth is hit by 109 meteor Aries-triangulids Omega Capricornids Arietids Omega Scorpiids showers every year (listed at Beta Corona Austrinids Omicron Centaurids right), averaging 2 collisions Chi Orionids Orionids Coma Berenicids Perseids with streams each week Delta Aurigids Phoenicids Delta Cancrids Pi Eridanids Delta Eridanids Pi Puppids • Oddly, most “meteor showers”
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the 34 International Meteor Conference
    Program & abstracts of the IMC, Mistelbach, 2015 1 Program of the 34th International Meteor Conference Mistelbach , 27–30 August, 2015 Thursday, 27 August, 2015 14:00 – 19:00 Arrival and registration IMC participants at the Fachschule in Mistelbach, (for the residents of hotel Klaus the registration desk is at the hotel in Wolkersdorf). 19:00 – 19:30 Opening and welcome speeches. Opening of the 34th IMC by Cis Verbeeck; Welcome speech by Thomas Weiland, Chairman of the IMC-LOC; Welcome speech by Alexander Pikhard, President of the Wiener Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Astronomie; Practical announcements by Anneliese Haika. 20:00 – 21:00 Dinner (MAMUZ Museum - M-Zone). 21:00 – 22:00 Galina Ryabova. “MetLib Workshop” (Fachschule Mistelbach). 21:00 – … Informal socializing (IMC bar – Fachschule Mistelbach). A shuttle service is available for residents of hotel Klaus, departure see at the entrance IMC-bar. Friday, 28 August, 2015 07:30 – 08:30 Breakfast. Session 1 Observing and analyzing techniques (MAMUZ Museum - Kapelle). (Chair: Megan Argo). 09:00 – 09:25 Sirko Molau. “Population index reloaded”. 09:25 – 09:45 Pete Gural. “The American Meteor Society's filter bank spectroscopy project”. 09:45 – 10:00 Denis Vida. “Video meteor detection filtering using soft computing methods”. 10:00 – 10:15 Kristina Veljković. “Improvement of software for analysis of visual meteor data ”. 10:15 – 10:30 Richard Fleet. “Correlating video meteors with GRAVES radio detections from the UK”. 10:30 – 10:45 Debora Pavela & Miroslav Živanović. “The effective number of shower meteors in a reduced field of view”. 10:45 – 11:15 Coffee break & Poster Session. Session 2 Status of meteor camera networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Meteor Showers Associated with Near-Earth Asteroids
    A&A 373, 329–335 (2001) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010583 & c ESO 2001 Astrophysics Search for meteor showers associated with Near-Earth Asteroids I. Taurid Complex P. B. Babadzhanov? Institute of Astrophysics, Tajik Academy of Sciences, Dushanbe 734042, Tajikistan and Isaac Newton Institute of Chile, Tajikistan Branch Received 26 December 2000 / Accepted 20 March 2001 Abstract. Observed meteor showers associated with some Near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) is one of the few criteria that such asteroids may be considered to be candidate extinct cometary nuclei. In order to reveal new NEA- meteor shower associations, we calculated the secular variations of the orbital elements of 17 Taurid Complex asteroids with allowance for perturbations from six planets (Mercury-Saturn) over one cycle of variation of perihelia arguments. The Earth-crossing class of these NEAs and theoretical geocentric radiants and velocities of their meteor showers were determined and compared with available observational data. It turns out that each Taurid Complex asteroid is associated with four meteor showers. This is evidence for the cometary origin of these asteroids. Key words. comets – meteoroids; meteors – minor planets, asteroids 1. Introduction theoretical radiants suggested by Hasegawa (1990) and known as the ω-method is more appropriate and takes into It is generally accepted that meteoroid streams are formed account the fact that a meteoroid stream can give rise to as a result of the disintegration of cometary nuclei. The a meteor shower only when the orbits of the stream mete- presence of meteor showers associated with some near- oroids cross the Earth’s orbit. However, this method also Earth asteroids (NEAs) is evidence that such asteroids does not predict the radiants of all possible meteor showers have a cometary origin, i.e.
    [Show full text]