Windrush Scandal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Briefing paper No 11 THE EMBEDDING OF STATE HOSTILITY A background paper on the Windrush Scandal FRANCES WEBBER Additional research by Anya Edmond-Pettitt The embedding of state hostility: A background paper on the Windrush Scandal The embedding of state hostility ‘The UK Home Office hostile environ- are some of the questions thrown up by the ment policy is a set of administrative and Windrush scandal. legislative measures designed to make staying in the United Kingdom as difficult On 17 April 2018, prime minister Theresa May as possible for people without leave to stood up in parliament and apologised for the remain, in the hope that they may “volun- treatment of Caribbean pensioners who had tarily leave”.’ Wikipedia been rendered jobless, homeless, destitute and unable to access hospital treatment for cancer ‘It is wilfully misleading to conflate the after a lifetime living, working and paying situation experienced by people from taxes in Britain. Some had been detained, some the Windrush generation with measures deported. Some had died without hearing her in force to tackle illegal immigration and apology. protect the UK taxpayer’. Home Office, June 2018 But there has been no apology for the policies which were directly responsible for their treat- ‘This is not a glitch in the system; it is the ment; quite the reverse. What had happened system. [They have] violated no law. It to this group, the ‘Windrush generation’, was is the law that is violating [them].’ Gary presented as a series of unfortunate mistakes Younge, April 2018 in the application of legitimate and neces- sary measures for the protection of the British What exactly is the hostile environment? How public from illegal immigration. did it happen that people who thought they were British were told they were illegal immi- Finally, though, the voices of those whose grants? Who are the illegal immigrants that the lives have been blighted by ‘hostile environ- hostile environment was designed to catch? ment’ policies are being heard – not only those How did a person’s immigration status become of the Windrush generation, but others who such a life-defining issue, and the term ‘illegal have been unheard until now: children born immigrant’ change from a regulatory issue into in the UK, entitled to citizenship but unable a badge of criminality? Who decides who is a to afford the fee to register; women married ‘good’ immigrant and who a ‘bad’ one – and to British men who have left after domestic are we, if we accept these distinctions, helping violence; people who have overstayed visas to to perpetuate the hostile environment? These care for sick relatives, or through inability to CONTENTS 1. The hostile environment 4 7. Who are the ‘illegals’? Slipping into 21 2. The Windrush scandal 6 illegality 3. The roots of the hostile environment 9 8. The new numbers game 25 5. The ‘bad immigrant’: race, class and 15 9. The retreat from universal human 26 immigration rights 6. The role of the media 19 10. Resistance 28 Institute of Race Relations | Briefing Paper No. 11 2 The embedding of state hostility: A background paper on the Windrush Scandal afford rocketing visa fees, or through sheer exclusion, surveillance and enforcement, have inadvertence – all these and others who turned all foreigners into a suspect population have found themselves denied and excluded, and our society into a nation of border guards, perhaps detained and deported as ‘bad immi- establishing state xeno-racism and nativism as grants’, ‘illegal immigrants’. central to government policy. This background paper takes a historical While the change of name, from ‘hostile’ to perspective, demonstrating how the good ‘compliant’, is a tacit acknowledgement of immigrant/ bad immigrant dichotomy, and the the state racism informing the policies, much term ‘illegal immigrant’, have been deployed more is needed to dismantle the edifice – but and weaponised by politicians at different a start has been made, as some of those tasked times. We show how the roots of some hostile with implementing the policies – doctors and environment policies can be traced back social workers, landlords, teachers and even several decades – but it is the Cameron and some Border Force officials – come forward to May governments which, by building up a denounce them. complete set of interlocking policies of denial, Global Justice Now Institute of Race Relations | Briefing Paper No. 11 3 The embedding of state hostility: A background paper on the Windrush Scandal 1. The hostile environment A number of policies came together to create produce evidence of their entitlement to be in the ‘hostile environment’: the UK, to work, etc.1 » making access to most of the necessities of life dependent on immigration status, and shifting the burden of proof to those Conscripted into immigration seeking jobs, benefits, housing and other enforcement services, who must prove entitlement, rather than requiring the Home Office to The following people must check (and in some disprove it; cases record) the immigration status of those » requiring providers of jobs, benefits, to whom they provide benefits or services: housing and other services to check immi- » employers, who can be fined £20,000 per gration status of all applicants, and data unauthorised worker, or imprisoned for up sharing between the Home Office and many to five years for employing such a worker other agencies; knowing or reasonably believing them to » aggressive immigration policing. be unauthorised; » civil servants dealing with benefits; » local authority housing and benefits Necessities of life officers and social workers, who have a duty to notify the Home Office of unau- Those without permission to be in the UK thorised applicants; cannot: » private landlords, who can be fined or » Work legally: they can be arrested, charged imprisoned for up to five years for accom- with illegal working and have their wages modating someone without permission to confiscated be in the UK; » access means-tested benefits » colleges and universities with interna- » access social housing or homeless tional staff or students, who can be fined persons housing etc as employers and have their sponsor- » legally rent private rented housing ship licence withdrawn for lax controls on » embark on further or higher education international students; » access non-emergency hospital treat- » NHS hospital staff; ment if they cannot pay the full fees (150 » Bank and building society managers percent of cost) » The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency » have a bank account, making renting (DVLA) property impossible » Marriage registrars, who have a duty to » legally drive: they can be arrested for notify the Home Office of ‘suspicious driving whilst unlawfully in the UK marriages’. » marry: marriage may be investigated, postponed or stopped on suspicion that it Additionally, the Home Office is entitled to is an ‘immigration marriage’ demand, and routinely receives, information It is for the person seeking employment, 1 Other groups apart from undocumented migrants welfare benefits, housing (social or private), are not entitled to work, eg, visitors, most asylum hospital treatment, enrolment on a course, a seekers, college students. University students may driving licence, marriage, a bank account – to work only ten hours per week in termtime. Institute of Race Relations | Briefing Paper No. 11 4 The embedding of state hostility: A background paper on the Windrush Scandal on suspected ‘immigration offenders’ from » Immigration officers have conducted con- other government agencies including the troversial immigration status checks at police, Department for Work and Pensions London tube stations; (DWP), Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC), NHS Digital and the Department for » Immigration officers have all thepowers Education. of arrest, search of persons, use of force, search of premises, seizure of potential Immigration officials are ‘embedded’ in the evidence, of vehicles and documents that DVLA, in a number of police custody suites and police have, without most of the safe- in some local authority housing and children’s guards against abuse. departments. » Although detention is ‘a last resort’ accord- ing to Home Office policy, around 27,000 Aggressive policing people, including thousands of survivors of torture or trafficking, vulnerable and The abject failure of Operation Vaken, the bill- mentally ill people, are detained annually board van hired by the Home Office in 2013 for immigration enforcement, most for to broadcast the message ‘Go Home! Or face days or weeks but some for months or arrest!’ to irregular migrants, has obscured years. At least half are released, lending the thousands of immigration raids routinely weight to the belief that detention is taking place all over the country: unnecessary, arbitrary and responds to Home Office targets rather than a real need From 1993 to 2009 the number of immigra- to detain. Despite strong campaigning and tion enforcement officers in the country parliamentary pressure, governments have grew from 120 to 7,500; consistently refused to introduce a time » Many thousands of enforcement visits limit for detention, opting out of the EU or raids, involving several officials, take maximum of 18 months. place annually; Institute of Race Relations | Briefing Paper No. 11 5 The embedding of state hostility: A background paper on the Windrush Scandal 2. The Windrush scandal Awareness of the ‘Hostile Environment’ only records – although shipping companies’ ledgers, became widespread when it was revealed, in recently found stored at the National Archive, April 2018, that over the past few years, thou- will help many prove their arrival date. sands of elderly British or ‘virtual British’ residents, mainly from the Caribbean, who Why did the Home Office reject the evidence they came to the UK as children before 1973 with presented? Officials demanded four pieces of or to join parents, were finding themselves documentary evidence for each year of claimed treated as ‘illegal immigrants’ and fired from residence. Some later claimed they were not jobs, denied welfare benefits, housing and allowed to accept other forms of evidence.
Recommended publications
  • Windrush, Shame and Scandal: Race, Class, Gender, and Immigration in a British Context

    Windrush, Shame and Scandal: Race, Class, Gender, and Immigration in a British Context

    Windrush, Shame and Scandal: Race, Class, Gender, and Immigration in a British Context “I have learnt silence from the talkative, toleration from the intolerant, and kindness from the unkind; yet strange, I am ungrateful to these teachers”.i This paper explores the issues of race, class and gender at the epicenter of British immigration policy, with particular reference to the lived experiences and reality of the Caribbean “Windrush generation” an estimated 500,000 – 700,000 people in the UK, who arrived from the Caribbean between 1948 and 1971 and their descendants.ii This entails exploring the socio-historical context of the migration of the ”Windrush” Caribbean people to Britain and the experiences of themselves and their descendants in British society. Of necessity, we also review the history of immigration patterns control in the UK. This is a critical exercise in view of the current “Windrush crisis” occasioned by the discriminatory implementation and abuse of Immigration law to deport and disadvantage many of the Windrush generation and their descendants.iii In our review parallel streams or race, class and gender are seen to turbulently converge in the everyday lived experiences of Black people in Britain, giving rise to fractures and fault lines in the fabric and landscape of British society. It is crucial that we begin our review and place this crisis in a socio-legal historical context to ensure analytical veracity. In this regard, it is important to consider that the internecine European tribal conflict, known as “World War
  • Anthony Joseph & Friends Windrush: a Celebration

    Anthony Joseph & Friends Windrush: a Celebration

    Anthony Joseph & Friends Windrush: A Celebration Start time: 7.30pm Running time: 2 hours 50 minutes including interval Please note all timings are approximate and subject to change Arwa Haider talks to Anthony Joseph and Jason Yarde about putting together a concert to mark the seismic contribution the Caribbean diaspora has made to British culture. On 22 June 1948, passengers disembarked from the HMT Empire Windrush at Tilbury Dock in Essex. Several hundred of these passengers had boarded the ship in Kingston, Jamaica, and many had travelled from around the Caribbean to Britain: a country inviting immigration from Commonwealth nations as it sought to rebuild itself after WWII. The Windrush generation and its legacy marked a vital sea change for British culture. Tonight, British-Trinidadian poet, novelist, musician and academic Anthony Joseph celebrates the far-reaching impact of the Windrush and the Caribbean diaspora in Britain, with a line-up that is evocative, inspirational and multi-generational. ‘How do we look at 70 years of musical and cultural impact?’ reflects Joseph, when asked about his starting point for the show. ‘Caribbean people have been coming to Britain since the 1800s, but since the 1940s, the diaspora has gone through a series of waves of consciousness. The Windrush generation was coming to what they considered the mother country, trying to fit in and find a place, yet experiencing rejection and denial. We need to address the fact that that the Caribbean is not just Jamaica; I wanted to look at the influence of Trinidad in the 1950s, and how calypso merged into jazz.
  • Legitimacy and Citizenships Anna Waldstein

    Legitimacy and Citizenships Anna Waldstein

    Special Issue — Edited by I. Pardo and G. B. Prato Urbanities, Vol. 9 · Supplement 2 · April 2019 On Legitimacy: Multidisciplinary Reflections © 2019 Urbanities Legitimacy and Citizenships Anna Waldstein (University of Kent, U. K.) [email protected] Pardo and Prato’s edited volume on Legitimacy: Ethnographic and Theoretical Insights (2019) raises important questions about the relationships between authority, power and trust, especially (though not exclusively) in the realm of governance. As a medical anthropologist with long-term interests in the use of hand-made, botanically-based remedies (including cannabis), issues related to the legitimacy of these medicines have been implicit (if not explicitly addressed) in my research. However, after reading several of the chapters in Pardo and Prato (2019), I realized that the relationship between legitimacy and citizenship is actually of greatest significance for (and has the most resonance with) my work. As they explain in the introduction to the book, governance and law fail when they do not meet the challenge of establishing a working relationship between formal law and people’s cultural requirements. Thus, ethnographic studies of legitimacy at different levels of power raise fundamental questions about citizenship. This brief essay focuses on issues of legitimacy in relation to three anthropological conceptualizations of citizenship: biological citizenship (Rose and Novas 2003), cultural citizenship (Ong 1995; Goldade 2011) and spiritual citizenship (Guzman Garcia 2016). It takes inspiration from various chapters in Pardo and Prato (2019) and other related literature on citizenship, and draws on some of my own ethnographic work with Jamaican migrants in the United Kingdom.1 I show that while legitimate claims to biological citizenship are defined by both government and medical institutions, they must compete with the grassroots legitimacy that underpins cultural and spiritual citizenship.
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard Record of the Entire Day in PDF Format. PDF File, 1

    Whole Day Download the Hansard Record of the Entire Day in PDF Format. PDF File, 1

    Wednesday Volume 662 19 June 2019 No. 316 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 19 June 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 219 19 JUNE 2019 220 Drew Hendry: According to every piece of the Secretary House of Commons of State’s own Government’s analysis, there is no version of Brexit that fails to harm Scotland. New YouGov Wednesday 19 June 2019 polling shows that Tory members would prefer Scotland to be an independent country, rather than stopping Brexit. Which choice should the Scottish Secretary make: The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock a devastating no-deal Brexit Britain, or giving the people of Scotland the choice to be an independent European nation? PRAYERS David Mundell: Mr Speaker, it will not surprise you to hear me say that Scotland has already made its [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] choice on whether to be independent or part of the United Kingdom. The poll to which the hon. Gentleman referred was based on a false premise. This Government are about delivering Brexit and keeping Scotland at the Oral Answers to Questions heart of the United Kingdom. John Lamont (Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) (Con): Will the Secretary of State tell us how much SCOTLAND money the Scottish Government have given to local authorities in Scotland to prepare for our exit from the The Secretary of State was asked— European Union? Leaving the EU David Mundell: As far as I understand it, the UK Government have made more than £100 million available to the Scottish Government to help to prepare for 1.
  • The Windrush Generation

    The Windrush Generation

    The Windrush Generation London, United Kingdom 07/06/2018 Sara Maryniak and Cathal Charker This portfolio encompasses every possible aspect of the Windrush generation. There is a specific focus on the history of the generation which gives a solid understanding of who these people are before moving onto the current scandal that has been at the forefront of UK media for the most of early 2018. We included a vast history of the Windrush generation, personal stories and responses from both the government and the public in regards to the current situation while also looking at what this all means for immigration and the cultural impact on a much broader scale. Sara Maryniak and Cathal Charker 1 Contents Page 1. Introduction ……………………………………………. 3 2. Stories a. History of the Windrush Generation ……………. 5 b. Notting Hill and Brixton Riots …………………. 10 c. The Windrush Scandal - What is it …………….. 16 d. Public Response - Windrush scandal attempts to push out generation, only brings Londoners closer together …………………………………... 20 e. Stories Through Portraits: Windrushers 70th Anniversary………………………………………. 24 f. From Jamaica to London: the Story of Alfred …... 28 3. Website a. Website Design …………………………………… 31 4. Reflection a. Reflection Report ………………………………….. 33 5. Sources a. Oral Sources ……………………………………….. 40 b. Written/Literature Sources ………………………... 43 6. Miscellaneous a. Print out of electronic timeline …………………….. 46 Sara Maryniak and Cathal Charker 2 Introduction As a result of the losses during the Second World War, the British government began to encourage mass immigration from the colonies of the British Empire and Commonwealth to fill shortages in the labour market. The Windrush generation became those who migrated from the Caribbean between 1948 and the 1970’s.
  • VOL 36, ISSUE 3 on Race and Colonialism WELCOME to THIS EDITION of ANVIL

    VOL 36, ISSUE 3 on Race and Colonialism WELCOME to THIS EDITION of ANVIL

    ANVIL Journal of Theology and Mission Faultlines in Mission: Reflections VOL 36, ISSUE 3 on Race and Colonialism WELCOME TO THIS EDITION OF ANVIL ANVIL: Journal of Theology and Mission Lusa Nsenga-Ngoy VOL 36, ISSUE 3 2 ANVIL: JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY AND MISSION – VOLUME 36: ISSUE 3 THE EDITORIAL While it is premature to assess the legacy of this year in history, we can certainly agree that 2020 has brought to the fore the imperative need to revisit the past, paying particular attention to societal and systemic fractures adversely impacting the lives of many around the globe. In the wake of George Floyd’s murder, millions of people took to the streets of our cities demanding radical change, and calling for the toppling of an old order and its symbols of power, objectification and commodification. This issue of Anvil is inspired by a willingness to Harvey Kwiyani’s article offers us a crystal-clear view of offer an introspective response to this global wave how white privilege and white supremacy have provided of protest calling for racial justice and asking with the buttresses for empire and have made mission in insistence whether black lives do indeed matter in our their own image. To illustrate this, he movingly weaves societies and institutions. It felt imperative to ask the his own story from his childhood in Malawi to living in question of Church Mission Society and its particular George Floyd’s city of Minneapolis to now forming part contribution to the subject both in its distant and more of the tiny minority of black and brown people who contemporary history.
  • Windrush Generation

    Windrush Generation

    What? Why ? Take a moment to see if you can answer the 4 Ws Where? When? Genevieve Bent THE WINDRUSH GENERATION WHO ARE THEY, WHY ARE THEY IMPORTANT, WHY DO THEY MATTER? WHO ARE THE WINDRUSH GENERATION? The Windrush Generation were a group of people, from the Caribbean, who were called by the British Government to work and live in the UK. They arrived in Tilbury, Essex, aboard the Empire Windrush, on 22nd June 1948. There were around 800 young Caribbean men and women; who all arrived with dreams and goals for their ‘Mother Country’. Genevieve Bent Genevieve Bent WHY DID THEY COME OVER? Up until the early 1960s, many of the Caribbean Islands (and countries in Africa, Asia and around the world) were under British Colonial rule. They were a part of the British Empire. The Caribbean was known as the British West Indies – which is where the term West Indian comes from. The Queen was the ‘Head of State’ for all these countries and in 1948, the 1948 British Nationality Act was passed, granting all members of the British Empire citizenship and the right to live in the UK. After two wars, and the recent end of WW2 in 1945, the UK needed to rebuild its country and economy. The British Government advertised opportunities for employment which attracted many people to leave the Caribbean for the UK. Genevieve Bent Genevieve Bent EMPIRE WINDRUSH HMT Empire Windrush was originally a cruise ship (called Monte-Rosa) used in Germany, in the 1930s and was also used as a transportation vessel in WW2.
  • Dear We Write to You Following Confirmation That the Home

    Dear We Write to You Following Confirmation That the Home

    Thursday 26 November 2020 (by email and post) Dear Andrew Flintham, Managing Director, TUI UK and Ireland Antonio Mota, CEO, Evelop Airlines Gene Willson, Managing Director, Titan Airways Kurt Ekert, President and CEO, Carlson Wagonlit Travel (CWT) Paulo Mirpuri, CEO, Hi Fly Phill Blundell, CEO, Air Tanker We write to you following confirmation that the Home Secretary Priti Patel is planning a mass deportation of Black British residents to Jamaica on the 2nd December 2020. We understand that your companies have recently worked with the UK Government to operate and facilitate charter flight removals from the UK and we have grounds to believe that one of your firms may be planning to operate the flight planned for 2nd December. We are writing to ask you to decline to operate the flight on the 2nd December and to pause the operation of deportation flights to Commonwealth countries for the foreseeable future. There are a number of important reasons why such flights are wholly inappropriate at this time and risk the unlawful and wrongful removal of people who have the right to remain in the UK. The Windrush scandal has not been resolved, and yesterday the Equality and Human Rights Commission concluded that the Government’s hostile environment policies breach equality laws and discriminate against Black people.1 Additionally, it has recently been revealed that Alexandra Ankrah, the most senior Black civil servant working on the Home Office’s Windrush compensation scheme has resigned, describing the scheme as systemically racist and unfit for purpose.2 These developments call into question the Home Office’s competency to deal with the continuing injustices it has created.
  • Brexit for BAME Britain Rabia Mirza Investigating the Impact Dr Irum Shehreen Ali

    Brexit for BAME Britain Rabia Mirza Investigating the Impact Dr Irum Shehreen Ali

    November 2018 Kimberly McIntosh Brexit for BAME Britain Rabia Mirza Investigating the impact Dr Irum Shehreen Ali • BAME families are less likely to have savings, spend Summary and recommendations a greater share of their income overall and are less • The overall impact of Brexit on Black, Asian and able to weather economic hardships than white Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities will be families in the UK. This makes them sensitive to negative, both economically and for community changes to the price of goods post-Brexit. relations. • Despite assurances that ‘austerity is coming to • The government has a responsibility to lead by an end’, this is not the case. A further increase example. If British values include tolerance and of the personal tax allowance proposed in the fairness, then we expect to see a forward-looking, 2018 Budget will continue to benefit the richest positive and inclusive vision of Britain being the most. Overall public spending will remain at presented by our political leaders. This includes historic lows and proposed reforms will not undo economic policies that work for everyone and a public spending cuts since 2010. concerted stand against hate and division. • This will hit BAME people on low incomes and • BAME communities are in a triple bind: disabled people harder than any other groups. socioeconomically worse off than their white Now more than ever, working-age benefits need counterparts; blamed for economic insecurity and to be increased in line with the cost of living. ‘cultural change’; and, as a result, the main targets The government has not published its own of hate crime as visible minorities.
  • Windrush Scandal: Albert Thompson Still in Dark About Cancer Treatment Despite May's Promise | UK News | the Guardian

    Windrush Scandal: Albert Thompson Still in Dark About Cancer Treatment Despite May's Promise | UK News | the Guardian

    20/04/2018 Windrush scandal: Albert Thompson still in dark about cancer treatment despite May's promise | UK news | The Guardian Windrush scandal: Albert Thompson still in dark about cancer treatment despite May's promise Londoner still has not received any appointment date for radiotherapy – or an apology Amelia Gentleman Thu 19 Apr 2018 20.44 BST Albert Thompson, the Londoner whose case has come to epitomise the Windrush scandal, has spoken of his anguish as he remains uncertain about whether he is to get radiotherapy for his cancer a day after he heard Theresa May announce on television that he would “be receiving the treatment he needs”. As the fallout from the scandal continued to emerge, Thompson told the Guardian he was distressed to have no clarity, and upset that he had had no apology from the Royal Marsden hospital for the ongoing interruption to his cancer treatment. Thompson (not his real name) received a brief call on Wednesday night from a consultant at the Royal Marsden telling him that he would receive an appointment letter in “two or three weeks’ time,” and asking him in to come in so he could have some blood tests. He was despondent about the cursory nature of the contact. “He didn’t mention anything about radiotherapy,” Thompson said, noting that the hospital did not appear to be treating his case as particularly urgent. He remains concerned that despite the https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/19/windrush-albert-thompson-cancer-treatment-theresa-may 1/3 20/04/2018 Windrush scandal: Albert Thompson still in dark about cancer treatment despite May's promise | UK news | The Guardian commitment from May that he was to receive treatment, the hospital seemed in no hurry to reschedule the 12-week series of daily radiotherapy sessions he was due to start last November, before he was told that he was not eligible for free treatment without proof that he was in the UK legally.
  • Framing Immigration During the Brexit Campaign

    Framing Immigration During the Brexit Campaign

    Unsustainable and Uncontrolled: Framing Immigration During the Brexit Campaign Jessica Van Horne A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Studies University of Washington 2018 Committee: Kathie Friedman, Chair Scott Fritzen Program Authorized to Offer Degree: International Studies – Jackson School © Copyright 2018 Jessica Van Horne University of Washington Abstract Unsustainable and Uncontrolled: Framing Immigration During the Brexit Campaign Jessica Marie Van Horne Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Kathie Friedman, Associate Professor International Studies The British vote to leave the European Union in 2016 came as a major surprise to politicians and scholars. Pre-referendum scholarship indicated that while British voters had concerns about cultural issues, such as identity and immigration, they would ultimately decide based on economic considerations. However, post-referendum voter surveys and scholarship showed that immigration was a key issue for many Leave and Undecided voters. This paper addresses why immigration was such a significant issue, and why it was so closely tied to leaving the EU, by discussing how the official campaigns and print media sources prioritized and characterized the issue. I argue that the relative prominence of immigration in media coverage, and the increased likelihood that newspapers would use Leave-associated frames, which also corresponded with pre-existing negative attitudes towards immigrants, contributed to immigration’s overall
  • Submission to the Windrush Lessons Learned Review

    Submission to the Windrush Lessons Learned Review

    Submission to the Windrush Lessons Learned Review October 2018 Amnesty International UK is a national section of a global movement of over three million supporters, members and activists. We represent more than 600,000 members, supporters, activists, and active groups across the UK. Collectively, our vision is of a world in which every person enjoys all of the human rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights instruments. Our mission is to undertake research and action focused on preventing and ending grave abuses of these rights. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion. 1. Amnesty International UK (“AIUK”) welcomes the opportunity to make this submission to the review. 2. The review is urgently needed. The treatment of members of the Windrush generation that has been exposed is appalling; and that this has persisted for so long, affecting so many people, so dramatically, is more than sufficient to justify this review. 3. However, as we explain in response to the specific questions raised (under discrete subheadings below), there is a real risk that lessons will not be learned and any corrective measures will prove inadequate if the review or the Home Office response to it are too narrowly focused in either understanding of the relevant chronology or recognition of whom has been and continues to be wrongly affected. 4. The Government was, for example, right not to restrict the remit of its Windrush taskforce and guidance to either people who came from the Caribbean or other Commonwealth countries.1 5.