efused, returned for frauds w/e dishonor via 1" elass Certificate of Mailin ,
Bupreme Court of 40 asofpe
TICdBfg%&yggpdipaR4Yo2R, 2020 SHAM PROCEEDINGS CASE NO.: SC2 03 AlteredFRAUD; "FICTITIOUS PERSONS" Lower Tribunal .: captio 5D19-3465; 352018CA001906 our na eŸ,t us, living Melvin and Juanita style, vs. LAKE COUNTY, F A, T . headings... AL. Altered, DSC
Petitioner(s) Respondent
This case is hereby dismissed. This Court lac iction to review an unelaborated decision from a district court of app 1 is issued without opinion ce or explanation or that merely cites to an authori is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. See v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014); Jackson v. State, 926 So. 2d 1262 006); Gandy v. State, 846 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2003); Stallworth v. Moore, 0. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Harrison v. & Hyster Co., 515 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 1 di Publ'g Co. v. EditorialAm. S.A., 385 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1980); Jen . State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980). No motion for rehearin instatement will be entertained by the Court.
A True Copy Test: .
JonnA. T ino Clerk, e Court td
WESLEY HAROLD HEIDT FRAUD; "FI HON. GARY J. COONEY, CLERK Not us, living Melvin.and Juanita HON. SANDRA B. WILLIAMS, CLERK HON. LARRY EDWARD METZ
CONSENT NOT GRANTED; JURISDICTION DISPUTED FOR FRAUDS AND WANT OF JURISDICTION )0 South Duval Street Q O USoPOSTAGEO a $00 .502 E a
0ttice of tlje Clerk Hasler FIRST-CLASS MAIL ébupreme Court offloriba 01/23/2020 0 500 South Duval Street . US POSTAGE $000.50- Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1927
01 167 64
SC2 -103
O. BOX 922 o ELAND, FL 32736
3479ssos22 acce ilhI•IhlhillnNllini nilulhMuhtNh ull
Hasler FIRST ..ASS MAIL upreme Court offloriba 01/23/2020 3llahassee, Florida 3239 19 2 Z ZIP 32399 O m .. 011E11672564 Z Q
TD CTiflÛ 9 . SC20-103
P.O. BOX 922 * 9 GROVELAND, FL 32736
a47assoe22 sooe LIill!Nun•dlLinnhhvihNilhhlhIn) j;ln war powers h ag o eac Supreme Court offlortha Office ofthe Clerk 500 SOuth Duval Street Tallahassee, Florida32399-1927 JOHN A. TOMASINO PHONE 50) 488-0125 CLERK , WWW.fl emecOurt.Org MARK CLAYTON CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK JULIA BREEDING Contraband paperwork, STAFF.ATTORNEY- SHAM PROCEEDINGS . . . .
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW CA FRAUD; "FICTITIOUS PERSÒNS anuary 23, 2020 Altere s livi Melvin and Juanit captio , : vs. COUNTY, FLORIDA, AL. our names, style, CASE . 20-100 . headin ye rib iial G e umber(s) 3465; 352018CAO ns-
The Florida Supreme Court ceived the following documents reflecting a filing date of 1/21/2020.
Petition for Writ ()ffzj77
The Florida S Court's case number must be utilized on all pleadings and correspon led in this cause.
tr c EY HARO HEIDT FRAUD; "FICTITIOUS PERSONS" ME . HON. SAND . WILLIAMS, CLËfÎdis, living Melvin and-Jyuanita /
CONSENT NOT GRANTED; JURISDICTION DISPUTED FOR FRAUDS AND WANT OF JURISDICTION e o o
Office of tlje Clerk FIRST-CLASS MAIL &upreme Court offloriba 500 South Duval Street 1/23/202 as $000.502 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1927 -n .n
01 16 64
Sc20-100
BOX 922 G , FL 32736 -1 o-
347sásoe22 ecce inn-Pulilninnhnnllul•1h I nunnll•hj Igjs
ffice of tije Clerk gas FIRS LASS MAIL upreme Court offloriba a 01/23/2020 0 0 South Duval Street Q O agrazyma$0C .50- e a llahassee, Florida 323 -19 z Z ZIP 32399 O 011E11672564 E a
TR SC20-100 , * O O
* e P.O. BOX 922 GROVELAND 32 36
s47sss0s22 acce inililin-lishililliblilliln mal½Inn•l•l•nninnln Supreme Courtatglar ha ? ConThTb%hbYpd)1ârWd+17,, 2020 SHAM PROCEEDINGS 7 CASE NO.: SC20-100 . Lower Tribun (s).: Altered: 5D19-3465; 352018CA0019 XX captionFRAUD; "FICTITIOUS PERSONS" our names, style, Nob 4Wg hhfWncEJT.1:44ta vs. LAKE COUNTY, RIDA, ET headings... Akitered, omis 9 fL
pg;po P r(s) Respon
Because petit-ienprs have failed to show a right to the relief requested, they are not entitled to mandamus reli rdingly, the petition for writ ofmandamus is hereby denied. See Hu \v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). No motion for rehearing will b e ne , by this Court.
A6ENTsCANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, L GA, L WSON, and MUÑIZ, JJ. concur.
A True Copy Test:
JofinA. T sino Clerk, e Coult ....- k :
WESLEY HEIDT FRAUD; "FICTITIOUS PERSONS" N , living Melvin and Juanita e HON. GARY J. COONEY, CLERK HON. SANDRA B. WILLIAMS, CLERK
CONSENT NOT GRANTED; JURISDICTION DISPUTED . FOR FRAUDS AND WANT OF JURISDICTION a c - m Ottice of tfje Clerk §upreme Court offlor(ba Hasier FIRST-CLASS MAIL 500 South Duval Street 03/04/2020 AAA A0 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1927 POSTAGE UUv. U- 0. C ZIP32399 011E11685015
s 0 0
- P O. BOX 922 O GROVELAND, FL 32736
3 0922 B009 H n ijjlill Ingjlqj filyl fil ] ljjjjjjpy
0,ttite tije Clerlo ster FIRS L MAIL spre Court of oriba as 0 S th Duval treet a 42020 lah see, Flo a 323993927
Ot1 1 015
P.O. BOX 922 . ... GROVELAND, FL 32736
s473ss0922 eOOs lilvlilenshininivil•ll n•nnlilln!Irilliklluluin Via USPS Certified RRRMail Tracking No. 701811a0000D54996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D;C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF E I
REGISTERED WARRANTCLAIM --
co a er a peace I Melvin-C ;Lewis, Juanita-L :Lewis, sui Juris, v.c., prisoners ofwars, byspecial appearance publish Counter Cross Tort Claim Appellants
From 11th Cir. USCA 18-10107-CC; From USDC MDFL 5:17-CV-505-OC-JSM-PRL From USDC.MDFL 5:15-MC-10-DC-10-PRL; From FL SUP. CT. SC20-100,. SC20-103; From LT 5DCA 5D19-3465; From LT 35-2018-CA-1906. v.
MUN. CORP. D.O.C., its U.S., its STATE OF FL; its LAKE COUNTY SUBD. ACTORS; GARY J. COONEY, ESQ .- ''CLERK/ COMP." (then NElL KELLY), CAREY L. BAKER, MICHAEL PRESTRIDGE (then ED HAVILL) - "TAX ASSESSORS" and "TAX COLLECTORS DAVID W. JORDAN (then ROBERT K. McKEE) and its LAKE COUNTYTRIBUNAL, SHERIFF [LSCO] and LAKE COUNTY B.A.R. ATTORNEY PARTNER / ACTORS Plaintiff in error,.COUÑTER CROSS DEFENDANT/APPELLEES
Proclamation vacating all void judgments and orders for frauds and want ofjurisdiction,abinitio. Via USPS Certified RRR.Mail Tracking No. 70181130000054996422, May S, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSIONSTATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
"... a Rule 60(4)(b) motion challenge is warranted because a district court's failure to vacate a void judgment is pe,r se abuse of discretion." Burke v. Smith, 252 F.3d 1260, 1263 (11th (11th Cir, 2003).
Stipulations Of frautls and want of jurisdiction
1. Once again, Juanita-L :Lewis and Melvin-C :Lewis, "we", "our", "us", are undeniably
'here' solely by specialappearance in these corporate military tribunals to nullify,
vacate and reverse above PERSONS' void judgments and orders due to collective, joint
and several frauds and want ofjurisdiction, froni inception.
2. All above foreign corporatePERSONS admit tite real (your) Rule 17(a) DEFENDANTS:
THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DISTRICT OF COLUMBiA, "D.O.C.", its (ACT OF 1871
created 'government') UNITED STATES, "U.S.", its TERRITORY POSSESSION FLORIDA,
"t/p" - [STATE to.o.c.1 OF FLORIDA],"FL" and its LAKE COUNTY SUBDIVISION also U.s.
beholden TAX SCHEME ACTORS', "LCT"; "they", "their"; joint and severally admit, per
your D.O.C. - F.R.C.P. Rule 8 - failure to deny is admission; 1) their your/ repulsive;
physical, psychological, past and active WAR CRIMES against us, America, all other ,
foreign American Sovereigns withoutsubjects including all other Sovereign World
Nations, by your/their ultra vires wars, threats, duress and coercion: treasonous
frauds, misrepresentations, kidnappings, thefts, deceptions, illusions, all under color
2 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF ELORIDA TRIBUNALS
of law; 2) all foreign B.A.R PERSONS' confession of illusionary, deceitful, fraud and
false accusations we are their corporate fictional PERSONS, residents, Citizens, drivers,
agents, voters, officers, agents, individuals, taxpayers, employees, and they are not
our dejure government nor Law ofthe Land co.urts, 3) they are. NOT lawful judges-or
courts upon our Foreign Sovern American soil, but n1erely bankrupt and de facto
corporate D.O.C., U.S. tentacles masquerading as such3 4).their physical.coupd'etat
of our guaranteed republican form of government and their warlike occupation of our
land, the theft of our gold and silver -forcing nonconsensual insolvency upon us, 5) to
these vacated, reversed and set aside all of foreign B.A.R. beholden USDC and dues
paying members PH.1LIP R.LAMMENS,ESQUIRE and JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., ESQUIRE's
"he", him", "his", "their" protection of his other B.A2R. members and sister tribunals'
void "JUDGMENTS" and "ORDERS" profferedby elicit; frauds, continuous and
. repugnant wars, terrorism, slavery and involuntarysérvitude and peonage bý
admitted trickery and deceit, by false (im)personations, misrepresentations, and their
seditious and rebellion andpeonage; hereby confessingtheir seditious conspiracies
and deprivations of our unwaived, inherent, creator endowed, Law ofthe Land
protected and guaranteed Rights.
3. It is also stipulated that we have repeatedly requested contradictory evidence we
were incorrect in our sworn declarations, but all above DEFENDANTS refused to
respond and cho[olse to remain silent and again adniit their default and dishonor. Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 7018113D000054996422, May S, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
A default judgment nihil dicitis, once.again, entered in our favor.
4. We are also in recent receipt of yet another contraband propaganda unsworn rubber
.stamped commentary from foreign B.A.R. beholden actor JAMES S. MOODY, Jr. ,
ESQUIRE of DEFENEDANT USDC MDFL OCALA, DIVISION dated 4-8-20, as another void
order/judgment denying our petition to vacate his prior voidand-impermissible and
unsworn: commentaries, assumptions, presumptive conclusions, suppositions,
inference stackings, findings, "orders" and "judgments" for frauds, want of
jurisdiction, refusals to respond to our jurisdictional inquiries.and willful and deceptive
failures to prove he/ they ever had proper authority, from inception "ab initio"to
reach merits. We have not, do not and will never consent, and this additional unsworn
intrusive contraband and propaganda paper writing is also hereby vacated and
attached "Refused, returned for frauds without dishonor", ''Consent not granted" as
Exhibit 1.
5. Upon further review of our records above tribunal never sent us the required 1) index
on appeal to the 11th USCA, nor USCA requested documents 2) #25 and 3) #28, as
needed for the 11th Cir. USCA appeal appendix. Please remit those documents so that
we can reactivate our attempted 11th Cir. USCA'appeal'.
4 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking.No. 70181130000054996422, May5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY PQSSESSIONSTATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
6. All above foreign corporate B.A.R. beholden sub ect members tacitly stipulate by
fraudulerit and willful nonresponse, that we again nullify (t)his and other's reality
inverted fraud and false clairns that: 1) we are legal fictions like him, them and his
othernonresponsive respondeatsuperiorco business partners; as all void "order" and
"judgments" are nonconsensuallydirected to fictitious persons JUANITA LEWIS and
MELVIN LEWIS, WE ARE NOT; we have unrebutted and unchallenged priority, first
position and unchallenged common law copyrights to, 2) we did not respond to
DEFENDANT'S COUNSEl'S non pleading MOTION TO DISMISS for T.I.A. claim defense,
when in fact we did hand deliver it directly to his USDC OCALA on 11-28-17 and is
stamped received. It is hereby attached (page one only) as Exhibit2, S) our sworn
42 USC §§ 1983 -1986 - under penalty of perjury affidavit depositions, declarations,
statements and counter cross tort claim,18 USC violations "informations" are "nearly
incomprehensible", "nonsensical" and "frivolous",. yet he fails to similarly swear under
penalty of perjury oath and prove his obnoxious and despicably angryfraud and false
claims under oath, so that his offensive, hateful, vile and childlike commentary -
perjury can reach him... Per maximin law: "In commerce truth is sovereign" and "An
unrebutted affidavit stands as truth and Judgment" and 4) we "squandered
opportunity", when in fact evidenced records show we - as admitted breathing, flesh
and blood living peaceful In Iteneres and foreign Sovereign American inhabitants upon
Sovereign North American soil -did and have undeniably performed with truth, clean
5 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 701811300000S4996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
hands, diligence, and honor to seek our expressed, entitled and yet purposefully
denied remedy, recourse, redress, and relief - in three of his other shielded lower
sister FL's LAKE COUNTY, 5DCA and SUPREME COURT tribunals which are all in
admitted and repulsive conflict with Constitutional and legislative intent by- per
curium 'standard' abuse ofdiscretion employed by biasedforeign B.A.R. SUBJECTS-
beholden corporate and militarytribunals to test all DEFENDANTS and COUNSEL's
T.I.A. and U.S. t/p FL suppositions that FL has a plain, speedy and efficient remedy ...
that may be had in its state to.o.c.1[courts]. It is stipulated these are nullities hereby
vacated and reversed.
7. All above foreign B.A.R. PERSONS stipulate we have proven, without doubt, that FL
has no such plain, speedy, and efficient remedy in its corporate tribunals.
8. All concurring foreign B.A.R. behoiden U.S. STATE OF FL SUP. CT. PERSONS: CANADAY,
CJ, POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON and MUNEZ, JJ ESQUIRES and its FL 5DCA B.A.R.
actor ESQUIRES: EVANDER, COHEN and GROSSHANS which admit 1) they wrongfully
dismissed on a technicality claim we didn't attach requested appeal documents that.
we never received and 2) that they are mere FOREIGN ultra vires corporate and
military remunerated officers and that their §§ 1983-1986 conspiracies and
deprivations of our entitled Rights of remedy and relief are also in egregious
6 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No., 70181130000054996422,.May 5,.2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSIONSTATE OF FLORIDA TRIBU.NALS
conflict with its State Constitution, framers' legislative intent and their inherent
corporate and military nature also further proves LCT, Fl 's T.I.A. defense and fraud
and false claims were erroneously and fraudulently proffered to protect its co
business partners' vast (debt based FRN'S) 18 USC § 1957 acquired coffers, to our
detriment and compounded injuries.
9. These foreign B..A.R. ACTORS and their agents admit to their deliberate deprivational
"policies and customs" m.o. failures to 1) co.mply with theirown appellate statutes
and 2) provide us with the proper documents required for our appeal appendix.
10. All above foreign and biased PERSONS admitwe rebutted all their want ofjurisdiction
and unsubstantiated claims they are our dejure guaranteed Republican government
and STIPULATE that we have provided direct irrefutable evidence they are merely one
bankrupt and defacto corporation acting outside oftheir corporate military charters
and far beyond their 10 mile squares borders, boundaries and confines "ultra vires",
under color of law and by their unconscionable militarized war crimes, terrorism and
treasonous occupation by sheer force and through its other also beholden
subdivisions and affiliate corporate PERSONS, agencies, offices, departments, boards,
commissions, and instrumentalities also operating ULTRA VIRES and unlawfully on our
foreign Sovern American soil. No repeatedly requested contradictory evidence exists.
7 Via USPS Certified RRR MailTracking No. 7018113Q000054996422, May S, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C.U.S.'sD.C. TERRITORYPOSSESSIONSTATE QF FLOBlDA TRIBUNALS
11. All above CORPORATE AND MILITARY B.A.R. PERSON dues paying members confess
that we; with truth, merit, clean hands, and good cause; and by special appearance,
rebut, refute, deny and dispute his and all other foreign B.A.R. beholden dues paying
member's: silence to our inquiries, want ofjurisdiction, frauds,unsworn:
contraband, propaganda rubber stamped writings, incessant and insidious 18 USC §
1957 profits and coffers, and their collectively confessed: treason, frauds, lack of
Jurisdiction and due process of law violations; especially their criminally
choreographed mischaracterization, misidentification and misclassification of us,
Juanita-L :Lewis and Melvin-C:Lewis, "we", "us", "our(s)" as non-living and paper;
plaintiffs, defendants, litigants, parties, their slaves, their subjects, commercial
entities, corporate legal fictions / fictitious: D.O.C. residents, individuals, U.S. citizens,
PERSONS, drivers, voters, taxpayers, 14* Amendment Citizens, officers, agents,
instrumentalities, franchises/franchisees, employers, their traded chattel, sureties
for our copyrighted fictions, accommodation parties, and fiction trade names
JUANITA LEWIS and MELVIN C. LEWIS. Once again, we are not and do not consent.
TACIT PROCURATION FACTS AND STIPULATIONS.
12. Above foreign B.A.R. beholden dues paying member PERSONS stipulate they are not
lawful judges, but are merely bankrupt and de facto corporate officers, acting as
8 Via USPS.Certified RRR Mail Tracking No..70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN.AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE.OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
dejure judges in direct violation áf 18 USCC § 912 and otherwise appropriate and
applicable.
13. Above PERSONS and TRIBUNALS stipulate they are not lawful courts,.but are
unlicensed debt collecting and persons trading - corporations that have been
"struck off'' Dun and Bradstreet, Inc's register..
14. Above PERSON D.O.C.'S U.S. [ACT OF 1871 government] admits it is a certified
corporation having the D.U.N.S. No. 052714196.
15. Above PERSONS of STATE t o.o.c.1 OF FL fictional territorial possession admit they are
D.O.C., U.S. SUB CORPORATIONS also registered with D.U.N.S. No. 004078374.
16. Above corporate military 15ERSONS and tribunal actor PERSONNEL admit they have
illogically and capriciously ignored all pertinent, appropriate and applicable
precedented standards of review memorandums of law, points, authorities and
citations; particularlythose holding their standard of review on a "...motion to
dismiss must be construed in light most favorable to -us- the side opposing the
motion. ZENITH RADIO CORP. v. MATSUSHITA ELEC. IND. CO., 494 F. Supp. 1161 D.C.
Pa. 1980); yet, detrimentallyto us, he did not comply with any precedented standard.
9 Via USPS Certified RRR MailTracking No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE.OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
17. All above PERONS stipulate to theirwell sett.led precedent holding " a Rule 60(b)(4)
motion challenge is warranted because a district court's failure to.vacate a void
judgment ... for lack ofjurisdiction is per se abuse of discretion." Burke v. Smith, 252
F.3d 1260, 1263.(11th Cir. 2001), Burda Media, Inc. v. Viertel, 417 F.3d 292, 298 (2nd
Cir. 2005), quoting STATE ST.iBANK & TRUST CO. v. inversiones Errazuriz timitada, 374
F.3d 158, 178 (2nd 2004), and In.Re: WORLDWIDE WEB SYSTEMS, INC.328 F.3d
1291 (11™ Cir. 2003).
18. All above foreign B.A.R. beholden PERSONS involved agree and stipulate to their well-
established precedent holding "... a claim brought under Rule 60(b.)(4) challenging the
judgment as void for lack ofjurisdiction is a question of law." Oldfield v. Pueblo De
Bahia Lora, S.A., 558 F.3d 1210, 1217 (11th Cir. 2009); which to date remains ignored.
19. All above PERSONS hereby stipulate to tacit agreement and confess to our (your Rule
13(a) counter cross tort claim charges and informations, particularly their repulsive
wars, terrorismand all peace treaty violations, and all gross 18 U.S. Criminal Code
violations of- including but not limited to: §§ 4, 225, 241, 242, 513, 514, 872, 912,
1201, 1202, 1341, 1342, 1511, 1001- 3, 1622, 1961- 8 R.i.C.O., 2381- 2385.
20. All above PERSONS, including all foreign B.A.R. beholden actors, stipulate and confess
to their ultra vires: vast joint and several D.O.C. and U.S. conspiratorial and
10 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 7018113000R054996422,.M.ay 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE. OF FLORIÖA TRIBUNALS
unconscionable schemes to enslave: us, other foreign Sovereign Americans, America,
mankind, and humanity; per COl-ONEL EDWARD MENDELL H.OUSE and WOODROW
WILSON'S plans to create fictions in our IIving likeness to force PERSON-hood upon us.
21. All above and below D.O.C. and U.S. PERSONS and its/ their unclean hands corporate
militarytribunal officers, agents, actors and other beholden created instrumentalities
confess they are not a nation, not a land and not the/ our dejure republic union
government created for, by us and other Foreign Sovereign American people.
22. All above PERSONS stipulate that they are all one and the same and are not
sovereign, not immune, yet are entities that have "... descend(ed) to the level of mere
private corporations and take(n) on the characteristics of a mere private
[citizen]...where private commercial paper [FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES] and securities
[checks] is concerned. As such, like any other corporation, must be the holder-in-due-
course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon
who demands specific performance are made. For the purpose of suit, such individuals .
and corporations are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." per
CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. v. UNITED STATES. 318 U.S. 363 (1943).
11 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
23. All above PERSONS stipulate these corporations masqueradingas "government" must
then be willingto enter that contract or commercial agreement into evidence before
trying to get its o/so corporate and beholden tribunals to enforce its corporate
demands called: act$, statute$, rule$, regulation$, ordinance$, code$, fine$, fee$,
penaltie$, punishment$, taxe$, charge$, etc..Clearfield; yet, they have seditiously and
repugnantly not complied which constitutes admitted war crimes and slavery
24. All above. DEFENDANT PERSONS also confess and stipulate to established.precedent
Bond v. UNITED STATES, 529 U.S. 334 (2000) holding that "Enforcement ofthese
corporate statutes by local, state and federal [1ew policy enforcement] officers are
unlawful actions being committed against the Sovereign pul#ie people and these
officers are liable for their actions." Countersuits are admittedlyestopped in these
beholden nongovernmental, corporate military tribunals.
25. All above foreign B.A.R. PERSONS and actors, officers and agents confess and stipulate
we have thus found all above DEFENDANT PERSO.NS and their corporate and military
tribunals "civilly" and "criminally" liable, as counter charged, and although we are
Rightfully entitled to all.demanded redress, recourse, remedy and relief, they
protect(ed) their co business partners from our counter cross actions and placed
repugnantlyvoid ab initio, bias and prejudiced presumptive nullity "orders" and
"judgments", all herein proclaimed and decreed nullified, vacated and reversed.
12 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 70181130000054996422,.May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
26. All above PERSONS stipulate and confess that no such required (lawful) contract has
ever been produced into evidence by any PERSON, t/p, LTC, FL, U.S., D.O.C. that would
compel our performance in any way whatsoever.
27. All above CORPORATE PERSONS, tribunals and their hired armed policy enforcers~
confess their violations of 18 USC§ 1957coffersunjustlyenriched, condoned and
shielded by their repulsive wars, terror, slavery, t/d/c and 18 USC 872 extortions and
18 USC §§ 1961-1968 racketeering profit impermissiblytolerated for mere profit and
control of trusting and misled foreign American Sovereigns, like ourselves. ~ Sapp v.
. Reiff v. CITY OF PHIL. 477 F. 1262 and Lynch v.
N.C. DEPT OF JUSTICE, 367 S.E. 2nd 247.
28. All above PERSO.NS admit they refused to present the agreement, contract or situs
which would bind us to perform to their corporate statutes, codes, ordinances, rules,
regulations - into evidence before asking its tribunals to enforce its corporate statutes,
which are not laws. Clearfield. They are all unilaterally and admittedly condoning the
criminal enforcement of nonexistent contracts.
29. All above foreign B.A.R. and other beholden agent/ actor PERSONS stipulate they act
solely by fraud, intimidation, trickery, deceit; by ACTS which are not laws, and thus
13 Via USPS Certified RRR Ñlail Tracking No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE.0F FLORIDATRIBUNA1.S
operate under admitted m.o.'palicyand customof color of lawwhich,then require
lawfully and fully linowledgeable binding contracts includingbut not limited to; two or
more competent people, valid offer 8t acceptance, full. disclosure of all terms and
conditions, adequate consideration and remedy AKA "meeting of the minds" in order
to compel performance.
30. All above PERSONS in their corporate.miiitarytribunals stipulate we have, without
rebuttal, common law copyrighted these fictional trade names JUANITA LEWIS and
MELVIN LEWIS which have been undeniably recorded as evidence; these unrebutted
and unchallenged "Common Law Copyright Agreement" documents are already
recorded in evidence and remain as true and correct, all DEFENDANT usage
constitutes admitted unconscionableprofit by unauthorized copyright infringements.
31. We, Juanita-L and Melvin- C of the family :Lewis; herein "we", "us", "our(s)"; as
stipulated secured party creditors; as unrebutted: breathing, flesh.and blood, living
souls, neutral and peaceful In Itenere free inhabitants upon Sovereign North American
soil; have at all times explicitly reserved all of our creator endowed, inherent,
un[a]lienable Law ofthe Land protected and guaranteed Rights which "existed long
antecedentto the organization ofthe state / STATE", Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43
(1906), our unwaived Rights to contract and rescind uponfraud, are limitless and
those Rights still exists today even in light of U.S. bankruptcies AKA emergencies we
14 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 70181130000054996422, May 5,.2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
are not 'parties' to and cannot be compelled to..perfo.rm to fraudulently induced,
unilateral, quasi:/ adhesion agreements, contracts or bankruptcies we did not
knowingly and willingly enter into withoutfull disclosure, meetings ofthe minds
(obviously corporations do not have minds) of all terms and conditions required to
make any contract valid and lawfully binding.
32. We, meritoriously, truthfully, with clean hands and.under necessity, initiated,_inquired
into, and challenged their willful silence misrepresentingjurisdiction of our sworn and
unrebutted USDC miscellaneous filings, our 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 -1986 (your) Rule 13(a)
counter cross complaints, appeals, mandamus and certiorari writs by sworn affidavits;
solely by - non submission - "special appearance" to acquire justice, relief, to inquire of
and to test their "Tax Injunction ACT" DEFENSE theory and that its territorial
possession [D.o.c. based] allegations that its STATE [o. o.c.i OF FL has/ had a plain, speedy
and efficient remedy ... which may be had in its [courts], to test nonexistent due
process of law and their failed and flawed jurisfiction; permitted abuse of discretion
PCA's, dismissals, denials, extortions, kidnapping, ransom, subornation of perjury and
racketeering in order to ultimately steal our private home and iand if we don't keep
paying "discharging" their t/d/c violative 18 U.S.C.C. § 872 extortion fees. We have
proven it does not and their orders were biased, deliberately protective and flawed.
15 -Via USPS Certified BRR Mail Tracking.No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRiTORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA.TRIBUNALS
33. All above PERSONS and their corporate militarytribunals admit their extortion
schemes without its/ their corporate fictitious ultra vires territoryjurisfiction, void of a
required contract, situs, nexus and profitable "taxable privileges and callings" and
stipulate further we are not parties to it/ their "want ofjurisdiction" - corporate tax rolls.
34. All. above PERSONS and militarytribunals' presumptive, denials, opinions, findings,
conclusions, judgments, orders and other contraband papers impermissibly placed in
the record are wrongfully applied and directed to legal fictions/ fictitious persons
which.we are obviously not; all unsworn orders, judgments and opinions are also void
ab initio because a suit must be brought in your FRCP Rule.17(a) name of the "real
parties in/ of interests"; THE D.O.C. and its U.S. created and maintained corporate
"government".
35. All above B.A.R. subjects, persons and.actors confess there is no such truth to their
28 USC § 1341-T.i.A. claims of there being any FI's LAKE COUNTY TAX SCHEMERS
"plain, speedy and efficient remedy" especially in nonexistent 'courts' and that
DEFENDANTS have avoided all required onusprobandiburden ofproof protocol and
standards of review requiring sworn "court" petitions, warrants, and alleged "court"
objection hearings, prior to attempted levy and sale of our private owned home.
16 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.0.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
36. All PERSONS stipulate we have effectively rescinded all mistaken "authority"
. signatures on all documents, proceedings and filing fees which all DEFENDANT
PERSONS wrongfullymislead and induced us into, to our detriment and injury.
37. All above foreign corporate officer B.A.R. beholden PERSONS fully stipulate to their
willful violations of (our protected Rights) including but not limited 18 U.S.C.C.: § 4
Misprision of Felony, § 225 continuingfinancial crimes..., § 241conspiracy against
Rights..., § 242 Deprivat.ions of Rights under color of law, § S14 fictitious obligations...,
872extortion..., § 912 false (im)personation..., § 1001fraud and false claims..., § 1002
possession of false papers to defraud the United States...., § 1003 demands against the
United States..., Mail Frauds by § 1341frauds and swindles..., § 1342 fictitious name
and address..., § 1622 subornation of perjury; Const. Amend XIII criminal conversion
ofpeople into legalfictions; slavery and involuntary servitude/ peonage, §§ 1961-
1968 RACKETEER INFLUENCED and CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS..., § 1957 engaging in
monetary transactions derived from specified unlawful activity... and § 2384 sedition
and insurrection and otherwise appropriate and applicable.
38. All PERSONS and corporate militarytribunalfictions also tacitly admit they never had
jurisdiction to reach merits and unlawfully did so with reckless disregard warranting a
change of venue outside of its/ their municipal corporate militarytribunal D.O.C., its
17 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking Now 70181130000054996422,.May 5, 2020
IN AND FORTHE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA IRIBUNALS
U.S. and territory possessions masquerading as lawful republic of our dejure union
states.
39. We hereby proclaim and deem all void orders and judgments stricken, vacated,
reversed and/ set aside, ab initio, nuncpro tune.
40. All above foreign actor.B.A.R. beholden PERSONS.and militarytribunal persons fail to
deny we do not need a foreign non F.A.R.A compliant corporate and military tribunal
officer B.A.R. beholden actorto vacate and set aside his own or other B.A.R.
negotiorum jester's fraudulent, want ofjurisdiction - void ob initio orders and
judgments.
41. All above foreign corporate B.A.R. officers STIPULATE to their ignored U.S. SUPREME
COURT precedent holding " the availability of a state remedy may be so uncertain,
unclear, or speculative that it does not constitute a "plain" remedy within the meaning
of 28 U.S.C. § 1341." per Franchise Tax Bd. v. Alcan Aluminum Ltd., 493 U.S. 331, 110
S.Ct. 661, 666-67, 107 LEd. 2d 696 (1990), Rosewell, 450 U.S. at 517, 101 S.Ct. at
1231; Tully v. griffin, Inc. 429 U.S. 68, 76, 97 S.Ct. 219, 224, 50 L.Ed. 2d 227 (1976);
Hillsborough Township v. Cromwell, 326 U.S. 620, 66 S.Ct. 445, 90 L.Ed. 358 (1946).
18 Via USPS Certified RRR Mall Tractiing No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN. AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSIONSTATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
42..All B.A.R. and TRIBUNALS RERSONS stipulate we have shown their T.I.A. defense claims
to our 1983-1986 actions, are nuRities herein deemed vacated also pursuantto your
well settled precedent holding "Thus, absent a showing by sornplainant that the state
law does not provide a sufficient remedy for his constitutional claims, a federal
district court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a challenge to a state's scheme of -
taxation." See California v. Grace Brethren Church, 457 U.S. 393, 407-11, 102 S. Ct.
2498, 2507-09, 73 LEd. 2d 93 (1982) (applying the Act to declaratory relief); Rosewell,
supra. (applying Act to injunctive relief); Moss v..Georgia, 655 F.2d 668, 669 (5th
Unit B 1981)( applying Act to action for refund and damages). It is forever stipulated
that impermissible and yet comfortable frauds are systematically permitted to protect
their other ultra vires co business partners and tribunals.
43. All above foreign to America B.A.R. and tribunal actor PERSONS stipulate that we have
conspiratorial been deprived ofthose standard of review Rights of an opportunityto
raise Constitutional and other objections. AII yoid orders are proclaimed vacated and
reversed.
44. All above DEFENDANT B.A.R. beholden collective, joint and several DEFENDANTS also
admit they have NONCONSENSUALLY, unlawfully and unconstitutionally kidnapped
our lawful identities into your/ their 10-mile square corporate borders and chartered
D.O.C. and U.S. confines in direct violation of your res judicata precedents of 26 U.S.C.
19 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
.IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
§ 7701 Definitions and also. stipulatethatthere exists no evidence we ever appeared
or swore any allegiance to corporate DEFENDANTS before any court or tribunal to:
1) requestto have our bodies, minds and souls stolen and kidnapped for ransom,
converted into legal fictions, corporate U.S. 14th Amd. CITIZENS and PROPERTY of the
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION D.O.C. nor its corporate created, funded and maintained
government called the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC, THE U.S., etc., nor to
2).waive, renounce, relinquish, surrender or abandon our dejure living In Itenere
Sovereign American National allegiance - status and standing, nor 3) to somehow
become D.O.C. paper res-idents. (defined as "things-identified"), 14th Amendment
statutory paper U.S. CITlZENS, U.S. contracted legal persons, fictitious persons,
licensees, corporations, franchisees, licensees,1parties, employees, voters, drivers,
taxpayers agents, officers, nor sureties or accommodation parties for their unlawfully
and nonconsensually 'createdfrom ourstolen afterbirth'- legal fictions JUANITA
LEWiS and MELVIN 1.EWIS; (or any other fictional derivations). We, again, for the
record, do not consent and rescind any fraudulently induced signatures on all
contraband propaganda "applications" proffered by active and constructive frauds.
45. All above DEFENDANT PERSONS stipulate this counter cross tort " ... claim brought
under Rule 60(b)(4) challengingthe judgment as void for lack ofjurisdiction is a
question of law". Oldfield v. Pueblo De Bahia Lora, S.A., 558 F.3d 1210, 1217 (11th Cir.
20 . . Via USPS Certified RRR Mail.Tracking No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
2009)... yet ignored, avoided and still unanswered!
46. All above PERSONS agree and confessto well settled precedentthat "... a Rule 60(b)(4)
motion challenges is warranted because a district court's failure to vacate a void
judgment is perse abuse of discretion. See Burke v. Smith,.252 F.3d 1260, 1263 (11th
Cir. 2001), BURDA MEDIA, INC. v. Viertel, 417 F.3d 292, 298 2nd Cir. 2005 auoting
STATE ST. BANK & TRUST CO. v..Inversiones Errazuriz Limitada, 374 F.3d 158, 178 (2nd
Cir. 2004) and see In Re: Worldwide Web Systems, Inc., 328 F.3d 1291( 11th Cir 2003.).
47. AII above.foreign B.A.R. subject and beholden actors stipulate to that their Rule 60(b)
allows reliefto a party from a final judgment due to: (2) newly discovered evidence;
(3) fraud; and (4) the judgment is void; and (6) any other reason thatjustifies relief
and 60(d)(3) set aside a judgment for fraud on the court.
48. AII above PERSONS and military tribunals accept and admit their well settled
precedent "... that relief under Rule 60(b)(6) is an exceptional remedy which may be
invoked only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances. Griffin v. Swim-Tech Corp.,
. 722 F.2d 667, 680 (11th C 1984
49. All above PERSONS agree that ** " [One} affected by void judicial action NEED NOT
APPEAL." State ex rel. Latty, 907 S.W. 2d.at 486. "It is entitled to no respect
21 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 7018113D000D54996422, May 5,2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
whatsoever because it does not affect, impair, or create legal rights." Per your Ex
parte Spaulding, 687 S.W. 2d at 745, and that "A void judgment is a nullity from the
beginning and is attended by none ofthe consequences of a valid judgment.".Ex parte
, and see.Iaffe and Asher v. Van Brunt,
S.D.N.Y. 1994, 158 F.R.D. 278 ..."... Since the trial court's dismissal "with prejudice"
was void, it may be attacked either by direct appeall?] or collateral attack." Ex parte
Williams, No. 73, 845 (TEX. CRIM. APP. 4/11/2001).
50. **All above B.A.R. beholdeo subjects and its corporate military war tribunals confess
and stipulate that "when appeal.is taken from a void judgment, the .appellate 'court'
must declare the judgment void, because the appellate 'court' may not address the
m.erits, it must set aside the trial court's judgment and dismiss the appeal..."A void
. judgment may be attacked at any time by one whose rights are affected." El-Kareh v.
TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMM'N., 874 S.W. 2d 192, 194( TEX. APP. HOUSTON
[14™ DIST.1 1994; see also Evans v. C. WOODS, INC., No. 12-99-00153-CV, 1999 WL
787399, at *1 (TEX.APP. -Tyler Aug. 3D 1999).
. 51. AII above foreign corporate PERSONS stipulate to established precedent holding
all COU.rtS are diSSOlved 2008 - UK LTD. Jan. 2011 company house... No.
05853448; 12-2-2008 struck off and dissolved from the register of DUN & BRADSTREET
incorporated 24 June 2008 No. 515721152; per Clearfield Doctrine.
22 Via USPS Certified RRR A/lail Tracking.N.o. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY BOSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
52. It is well settled precedentthat "The [judge] is not the [court]." People v. Zajic, 8.8 Ill.
App. 3d 477 410 N.E, 2d 626 (1980); ifthere were anyjudges or courts!
53. All above corporate and mil.itary B..A.R. PERSONS stipulate that their 7th Cir. ruled that
"a decision produced by fraud [] is not in essence a decision at all, and never becomes
final." Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7 Moore's Federal practice, 2d Ed.
p. 512, pp 60.23.
54.. All above PERSONS-stipulate that at least one 'court' has held that no time limit
applies to a motion under the Rule 60(b)(4) because a void judgment can never
acquire validity... Crosby v. Bradstreet Co., 312 F.2d 483 ( 2nd Cir.) cert. denied, 373
U.S. 911, 83 S.Ct. 1300, 10 LEd. 412 (1963),
55. It is stipulated that "Time limitation does not apply where the judgment is based on a
fraudulent return." Washko v. Stewart, 20 Cal. App. 2d 311, 345, 347 (1937) and
Richert v. Benson Lbr. Co. 139 Cal. 671, 674 [34 Pa Cal 2d 840].
56. It is hereby also stipulated and verified precedent that "It is also well settled that a
judgment which is void on its face, and which requires only an inspection ofthe
judgment- roll or record to show its invalidity, may be set aside on motion, at any time
after its entry." Plotitsa v. Superior Court, 140 Cal. App. 3d 755. 761 (1983).
23 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FQR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSIONSTATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
57. All above DEFENDANT PERSONS confess we have rebutted any and all unsubstantiated
assumptions we are D.O.C. res- idents, U.S. persons,.14th Amendment citizens, U.S.
employees, franchises/franchisees, corporations, partnerships, property, CITIZENS nor
trusts per 26 USC § 7701 (30). (31) nor are we involved in trade or business including
performance of the functions of "public officer" and admit their collective wrongful
classifications of as fictitious U.S. Citizens, juristic persons and D.O.C.,resident
persons...51and that forever dispute being unlawfully 'treated as D.O.C. residents
and that we were never born, naturalized and.are not now "subjectto the jurisfiction thereof".
58. All ABOVE B.A.R. PERSONS and their corporate militarytribunals and actors confess
that " ... a Sovereign is not a person." United Mine Workers v. UNITED STATES, 330
U.S. 258 (1947); and that "The word "person" in legal terminology is perceived as a
general word which normally includes in its scope a variety of [entities1 other than
human beings." 1 U.S.C. § 1, CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY v. U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE, 612
F.2d 417, 425 (1979) and see.Kawananokoa v. Polyblank, 205 U.S. 349, 27 S.Ct. 526, 51
L.Ed. 834, (1907). The term "person" excludes the Sovereign." It is also stipulated we
are unrebutted Foreign Sovereigns without subjects." Wilson v. Omaha Tribe, 442 U.S.
653, 667 (1979) quoting UNITED STATES v. COOPER CORP.., 312 U.S. 600, 604 ( 1941).
Per maxim in law: "The expression of one thing is the exclusion of the other."
24 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSlQN STATE QF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
59. All above PERSONS and tribunals/ actors stipulate.thatthere exists no evidence
whatsoever that we have at any time or any place ever willfully or knowingly
'appeared' before any military tribunal, competent nor corporate court nor
commercial venue to swore under oath we intend(ed) intentionallywaive, relinquish,
renounce no.r surrender our living dejure American allegiance/ status, in order to
become a fictitious U.S. 14th AMENDMENT PERSON, a legal fiction, a fictitious PERSON,
citizen, chattel, or property of THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC., its ten mile square
borders, nor its unlawfully created "government" [ by THE ACT OF 1871] U.S. "... ond
not otherwise..." per your precedents: CITY OF MiNNEAPOLIS v. Reum, 56 F. 576 (8th
C.C.A. 1.893), Lanz v. Randall, 4 Dill. 425, Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162. 167; M
Law Nat. p. 101; Morse, Nat, 125, and Kitchens v. Steel, 112 F.. Supp. 383; (WD Mo.
1953) Id. At 268, 87 S.Ct. at 1668, .2 stat. 153, c. 28, § 1;
Rev. St. § 2165, 4 Stat. 69, c. 186, § 1; Rev. St. § 2167, and Boyd v. NEBRASKA, 143 U.S.
135, 160, 12 S.Ct. Rep. 375, UNITED STATES v. Anthony, 829.24 FED. CAS.- 53 (1874),
24 Fed. Cas. 829 (No. 14, 459), 830, held: Prior to the XIVAmendnient" ... there was/is
no such thing (no specific definition) as a citizen of the United States...it is inconsistent
with proper construction and common misunderstandingofthe expression as used in
the Constitution..." Affroyim v. Rusk,
(8 U.S.C. § 1481 and Cruden v. Neale, 2
N.C. 338 (1796) S.E. 70.
25 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNAl.S
60..All above PERSONS and its/ their corporate military tribunals admit established
precedents: Schware v. Board of [B.A.R.1 Examiners,353 U.S. 232 (1957), Sims v.
Ahrens, 271 U.S. S.W. 720 (1925), Dent v. Westyirginia, 129 U.S. 114. Cf. Slochower v.
Board of Education, 350 U.Š. 551, Wieman v. Upedgraff, 344 U.S. 183 ; holding that
foreign B.A.R. licensing is a fraud; "no state can ficense the practice of law."; also see
Douglas v. Nobler.261 U.S. 165, Cummings v. Missouri, 4 Wall 277, 319 - 320, Cf.
Nebbia v. New York, 291U.S. 502.
61.. All above persons admit ignoring our first FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT, 'EOlA"
5 U.S.C. § 552, 80.Stat. 250 requests and we request this second demand of all USDC
tribunal B.A.R. beholden corporate officer subjects, particularly: JAMES S. MOODY, Jr.,
ESQUIRE, PHILLIP R. LAMMENS, ESQUIRE's sworn and s.ubscribed oaths of offices and
their licenses to; trade, collect debts and practice law -including B.A.R. allegiant
PERSON actor LARRY EDWARD METZ, ESO.UIRE, DIANA MASTERS JOHNSON, ESQUIRE,
GARY J COONEY, ESQUIRE and all 5DCA B.A.R. co business partner beholden ESQUIRES
including all FL S.Ct. panel B.A.R. agents; including all of their B.A.R. member numbers,
hazard insurance bonding informations including their insurance companies, their
policy numbers, their address and phone numbers, policy- contract numbers, liability
amounts, dates and any and all proofoftheir individual / alleged B.A.R. licenses to
circumvent charges of unlicensed practice of law, a.k.a. "UPL".
26 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s.D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIB.UNALS
62. All above foreign corporate B.A.R. beholden subjects also stipulate our 11th
amendment protection guarante.eing "The judicial power of the UNITED STATES shall
not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted
against ... Citizens or Subjects of any.Foreign State."
63. All involved foreign B.A.R. PERSONS stipulate their precedent holding that "Denying a
motion to vacate a void judgment is-per se abuse of discretion." Burrell v. Henderson,
et al., 434 F. 3d, 826, 831 (6th Cir 2006).**, PREWITT ENTERS., INC. v. ORG. OF
PETROLEUM EXPORTING COUNTRIES, 353 F.3d 916, 920 (11™ Cir. 2011)
Notice offull disclosure:
We, Juanita and Melvin ofthe family :Lewis, again affirm under GOD's laws, the
foregoing sworn under penalty of perjury without the United States of proclaim the foregoing affidavit and declaration vacating, reversing and set aside of all void orders and judgments are true, correct and not meant to mislead, deceive, nor be
incomprehensible, nonsensical, incoherent, moot, vexatious or frivolous.
Encl. Exhibits 1 and 2
Our word of truth is our bond.
27 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 70181130D00054996422, May 512020
IN.AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESS.ION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
All Rights Reserved, without
prejudice UCC 1-308 as/ by
Authorized representative of fiction
"MELVIN LEWIS"; per common law
copyright agreement duly filed.
vicoactus;byspecial"appearance"
bprint
Non war powers American Flag of peace
Melvin-C :Lewis,
As authorized representative of
fiction ".IUANITA LEWIS"; per
common law copyright agreement
duly filed.
. int
Non war powers American flag of peace
Juanita Lewis,
28 Via USPS Certified RRR Mail Tracking No. 70181130000054996422, May 5, 2020
IN AND FOR THE D.O.C. U.S.'s D.C. TERRITORY POSSESSION STATE OF FLORIDA TRIBUNALS
Send all sworrr rebuttals to /By;
Temporary Postal Mailing location
c/o PO Box 992
Groveland, Florida RFD
nondomestic, noncommercial
Certification of service
We, as unrebutted flesh and blood, breathing and In Itenere living souls, certify on this 6th day of May
2020, that copies of this affidavit and proclamation vacating, reversing and set aside of all void judgments and orders, were served upon related PERSONS /LOWER / UPPER TRIBUNAL AGENTS and
OFFICERS B.A.R. actor - agents and their 1) USDC at.207 NW 2"8 ST OCALA, FL 34475 USA and also to their 2) USCA 11™ CIR. at 56 FORSYTH ST NW, ATLANTA, GA 30303 USA, their 3) THE U.S. STATE OF FL and B.A.R/ OFFICER'S SUP. CT. at 500 S D.UVAL ST, TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399 USA, 4) THE U.S. STATE OF FL
B.A.R. OFFICERS' 5DCA at 300 S BEACH ST, DAYTONABEACH, FL 32114 and 5) LAKE COUNTY S™ JUD. CIR.
B.A.R. AGENTS LARRY EDWARD METZ, ESQUIRE and GARY J. COONEY, ESQUIRE at550 W. MAIN ST
TAVARES, FL 32778 USA, AND 6) LAKE CO.UNTY B.A.R. AGENT DIANA MASTERS JOHNSON, ESQUIRE at
315 W. MAIN ST, TAVARES FL 32778 USA by USPS first class certified mail and certificates of mailings.
All Rights reserved without prejudice;
Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent.
29 refused,returned forfrauds w/o dishonorvia Certified Mail.No.70181130000064996422, 5/5/20 Case 5:17-cv4050525M-PRL Document 36 Piled 04/08/2020 Page 1 of 4 PagelD 669
UNITED STATES DISTRICT 60UiR@owersJmdcan MIDDLEDISTRICT OF FLORIDA ARe ech - OCALADIVISION hea® AUFple'§@BT OUS PERSONS" . Nm }¼v724;r N not living Melvin or Ju i v. : 5:17-cv-505 O Con d paper NIEL LY, CAREY L..BAKER, S PROCEED MICHAEL P GE and ROBERT AkeredKENNE KEE, omissions- Defendants.
ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the Court Juanita Lewis and Melvin
Lewis's construedmotionto setasidejudgmqnt 90c. 35), titled"Deniedwrits & 42 U.S.C.
§§ 1983-1986; conspiracies and deprivafs fRights under color oflaw and 18 USC §§
225, 241, 242, 872,875-876, 9k22, ý37, 1961-1968...." As far as this_Úourt can. tell,
Plaintiffs are seeking an ord t g aside this Court's order dismissing this case for lack of jurisdiction be ors made by this Court and the Eleventh Circuit Court of
Appeals based olynew evidence.1 The Court concludes the motion-aterm the Co'urtuses
loosely gi nearl incomprehensible hature ofthe filing-must be denied. O
As the Court explainedwhen denying Plaintiffs' motion for recons.ideration (Doc. 27) of its d der dismissingthis case more than two years ago,
Plaintiffs sued to challenge Defendants' attempts to collect taxes on Plaintiffs' property. (Doc. 1, ¶ 2). Plaintiffs argued that Defendants lack the ability to tax Plaintiffs' property, which is essentially an argument challenging Lake County, Florida'spropertytax scheme.Defendantsmovedto dismiss the actionarguingthat this Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over the claim pursuant to the Tax
CONSENT NOT GRANTED; void order - jurisdiction chaBlenged refused, retumed forfrauds w/o dishonorviaCertified Mail No. 70181130000064996422, 5/5/20 Case 5:17-cv-00505 JSM-PRL Document 36 Filed 04108/2020 Page 2 of 4 PagelD 670
Under e of Civil Procedure 603 a Court can set aside a final judgment for the following reasons:
(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in timeto move for a newtrial under Rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or . extrins misrepresentation, or misconductby an opposing party; . (4) thejudgment is void; . (5) thejudgment has been.satisfied, released, or dischargedpiti hased on an earlier judgment that has been. reversed or vacatpcf; r applying it prospectively is no longer equitable; or (6) atiy other reason thatjustifies relief. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). As far as the Court cantell, Blfi s allege errors by this Court and errors by theEleventh Circuitthat areevident e ofnewlydiscovered.evidence. (Doc.
35, p. 7). But a plaintiff seeking to h gment set aside based on newly discovered
evidence must seek to have the c se aside within one year of the entry of the
judgment. Fed. R. Civ. ). Here, assuining that is the basis ofPlaintiffs' motion,
Inju t òn Act 28 U.S.C. § 1341. (Doc. 16). Rather than respondingto the motion, ldintiffs filed frivolous motions arguing that Defendants defaulted by failing to a spond to the Complaint and attempting to strike the motion to dismiss. (Docs. 18 d21). AftertellingPlaintiffstwiceto respondto themotionto dismiss to no avail, and sua sponte extending the time for them to do so, the Court considered the motion to dismiss without a response from Plaintiffs. (Doc. 25). The Court agreed with Defendants' argument and concluded the Court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' claim. The Courtdismissed the case with prejudice...." (Doc. 28).
CONSENT. NOT GRANTED; 92oid order - jurisdiction chaBBenged refused, returned for frauds w/o dishonorvia Certified Mall No. 70181130000064996422, 5/5/20 Case 5:17-cv-00505-JSM-PRL Document 36 Filed 04/08/2020 Page 3 of 4PagelD 671
it is untimely because the Court entered its final order dismissing this case on December .
15, 2017, and the motionto set aside was filed April 6, 2020-well after the deadline.
But even considering the merits, Plaintiffs are ong. This Court didnot err when
it concluded it lacked subject-matterjurisdiction over Plaintiffs' claim.2 But even ifit diÈd,y Plaintiffs had the opportunity to challenge that ruling when it appealed the di .
Plaintiffs, though, d eir opportunity to have the appellate copi iew the dismissal because lamtiffs had their appeal dismissed for failing e by appellate
procedural requirements. (Doc. 34). So even if this Court ha , Plaintiffs lost the
ability to challenge that error, andthe interest offinality wel ainst allowing Plaintiffs to challenge the dismissal yet again. Cana v. Baker,. .3d 1337, 1340 (11th Cir. 2006) ?
(explaining, "need for finality ofjudgments" c igh equitable circumstances raised
by movant in Rule 60(b) motion, especiall here equitable circumstances are caused by the movant's actions).
In sum, Plaintiffs' motio pustbe deniedforseveral reasons. First, ipifno
Second, giving Plaint ee, b t ofthe doubt and assuming their ar ts are based
on newly discover vidence, the motion would be untimely. Third, Plaintiffs' have had o . 7 ...... several opp , . s at having thi 's order dismissing their case reviewed-both by
this a motion for reconsideration and in an appeal before the Eleventh Circuit-
. 2 The Court also notesthat is lacksjurisdictionto review alleged errors committed by the Eleventh Circuit during their prior appeal. 7
CONSENT NOT GRANTED;. sold order - jurisdictdon chaBDenged refused,.returned for frauds w/o dishonor via Certified Mall No. 70181130000064996422, 5/5/20 Case 5:17-cv-00505fM-R8 Document 36 Filed 04108/2020 Page 4 of 4 PagelD 672
all a 10 furtherance offinality, the Comt concludesPlaintiffs shouldnotbegiven yetpother hance.
Accordingly, it is ORDEREDAND ADJUDGED that Plainti JuanitaLewis andA
Melvm Lewis) construed motionto set asidejudgment (Doc. 35) is DENIED. , ży
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 8th day ofApril, 2020.
JA31ES S.3IO I^ATTEB STATEf STRICTJUDGE Copies furnished to: Counsel/Parties ofRecord
-...... - - .. . - -
CON$ENT NOT GRANTED; t4oid order - jurisdicti©ñ chaHenged refused, repeci-f. uds w/o dishonorviaCertifiedMail NO. 70181130000064996422, 5/5/20
MIME-Vhysion:1. 0 From:cmec _ [email protected] To:cmecf_flmd [email protected] Bcc: --Case Participants: --Non Case Participants: --No Notice Sent:
Message-Id:[email protected]> Subject:Activity in Case. 5:17-cv-00505-JSM-PRL Lewis et al v. Kelly et al Order on Motion to Set Aside Judgment Content-Type: text/plain This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO. PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** .Judicial Conference of. the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all döcuments filed electronically, If receipt is required by law or directed by the fi3.er. PACÈR access fees apply to .all other users. To avoid later charges, döwnload aeci5pÎ of each document during this first viewing. Nowever, if the referenced. do eàt is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do, not apply. U.S. District Court . Middle District of Florida
Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 4/8/2020 11:01 and filed on 4/8/2020
Case Name: Lewis et al v. Kelly et al
Case Number: 5r17-cv-00505-JSM-PRL https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktR t plŸ342895 Filer:
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 12/18/2017
Document Number: 36 copy the URL address from e ÎLine below into the location bar of your Web browser to the document: https://ecf.f1md.usc^ .s.gov/doc1/047121414436?caseid=342895&de setnum·=124&mag ac num=MAGIC o
Docket Text: Î.h° ORDER: Pla fs and Melvin s' onstrued, motion to set aside judgment (Doc. [351) . ed By ames S. Mood iTr. on 4/S/2020. (SNB)
5:17-cv-00505-JSM-PRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: Diana Masters Johnson [email protected]
5:17--cv-00505-JSM-PRL Notice has been delivered by other means to: Juanita Lewis ox-992 Groveland, FL 34736 M ew P ex-992 CONSENT NOT GFANTED; woid order - jurisdection cha0Henged refused, returned forfrauds w/o dishonor via Certified Mail No. 70181130000054996422, 5/5/20
Groveland, FL 34736
The following document (s) are associated with this transaction: Document description: Main Document Original filename: n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1069447731 [Date=4/8/2020] [FileNuntber=19521146-0] [3757ffe000fdb3a65eb46c351019a5f759aed81â785cd6e246Sc178618dd5f7eafd7c97fe02alle 837a26ed0.65cbc6d6e001b71bee354.edle6bfbedc14cc9ecd]]
CONSENT NOT GRANTED; void order - jurisdiction chaB2enged UNITED 5TATES DISTRICT COURT OFFICE OF THE CLERK GOLDEN-COLLUMMEMORIALFEDERAL BUILDING & US COURTHOUSE 207 NW SECOND STREET, RoOM337 OCALA, FLORIDA 84475-6666 02 iP OFFICIAL BUSINESS 07)009lft 83a APR n96020a f lLElQRO IP CODE Q47
C
Melvin Lewis PQox 992 Groveland, FL 34736
m
O O. 34735$0092 E!otO 'l'ff'''Jfhfl/'t O O Q 5. na
Eli UNITED STATES DISTRI COURT 'b!!u!"".k5:::f",$JWTl I OFFICE OF THE CLERIC 2 , , FL 320 GOLDEN-COLLUM SpMOÎlAL FEDE L BUlLD e & US COURTHOUSE 207 NW SECOND TRCgT, ROOM 7 o OCALA, FLORIDA 44716666 FM 2 1, 02 iP oFFICIALBUSINESS 0000077163 APR 00 2020 CO
19|AILED FROMZIP CODIE 34475 (O O
m affit Lewis e PO 02 42 Grosel d, FL 73 00 60 . M c a
. In the United States Court
- ewis, Melvin - Lewis; Sui Juris, In propria persona
Petitioners Case No. 5:17-cv-505-oc-30PRL
Jury Demand - Yes - THE STATE OF FLORIDA's i.AKE COUNTY, .INC. and OFFICERS: NEIL KELLY- CLERK, t& CAREY L BAKER; MICHAEL PRESTRIDGE, (then ED HAVIL) - TAX ASSESSORS and ROBERT KENNETH McKEE -TAX COLLECTOR.
RESPONDENTS
MOTION TO STRIKE ANTS' COUNSEL'S MOTION TO DISMISS
For Declaratory, Emergency Injunctive Relief, by 42 USC §§ 1982, 1983, 1985, 1986, 1988 Deprivations and 18 USC §§ 225, 241, 241, 872, 1951, 1957, 1963, 1964 and including R.I.C.0. Violations
1 U OSTA E PAID EN o O LAND, FL uanitaPL :Lewis, and Melvin÷C lewis v.c., all Rights reseked W & MAY3473611 20 AMOUNT Temp ry Rbstal Mailing Locatioh $2.40 ...... ------Reso4w120ses-o4 c/o PABN992 Groveland/ Florida RI 4 nondomestic noncommercial
p DN/llN B@R$4%BI IISACANADAfrCJ I?ØLSTO§liLABARG . N and MUNEZ; J. E SQUIRES /o 500 5.)DUVAL ST TALLAHASSEE FL32399CUSA9 .