PIA SA 2008 STATE CONFERENCE

PLANNNINGPLANNNING ANDAND DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT

LEGISLATIONLEGISLATION && CASECASE LAWLAW UPDATEUPDATE

JULYJULY 20072007 –– JUNEJUNE 20082008

Presented by Mellor Olsson Lawyers

PIA SA 2008 STATE CONFERENCE

LEGISLATIONLEGISLATION UPDATEUPDATE JULYJULY 20072007 –– JUNEJUNE 20082008

Presented by Tim Mellor Partner, Mellor Olsson Lawyers

PIA SA 2008 STATE CONFERENCE

CASECASE LAWLAW UPDATEUPDATE JULYJULY 20072007 –– JUNEJUNE 20082008

Presented by Anthony Kelly Partner, Mellor Olsson Lawyers

1. How site area should be calculated

• v Terra Equities Pty Ltd [2007] SASC 244

2. Plan provisions not being mandatory in nature

• O’Connell Properties Pty Ltd v City Council [2007] SASC 456

• Town of Gawler v Impact Investments [2007] SASC 356

3. Whether land division should take place before or after an application for Development Plan consent

• City of Port Adelaide Enfield v Moseley [2008] SASC 88

• Kermode v City of Mitcham [2007] SAERDC 57

4. Council’s obligations when assessing a development application, particularly in relation to the question as to whether the proposal is seriously at variance with the development plan

• Mar Mina (SA) Pty Ltd v & Anor [2008] SASC 120 • Paradise Development (Investments) Pty Ltd v District Council of Yorke Peninsula & Anor [2008] SASC 139

5. Matters to consider when determining the nature of the development and its classification

• Paradise Development (Investments) Pty Ltd v District Council of Yorke Peninsula & Anor [2008] SASC 139

6. Joinder of third parties

• O’Neil & Anor v Kimhi & Ors [2008] SASC 109

7. Whether delegations extend to Acting Managers

• Paradise Development (Investments) Pty Ltd v District Council of Yorke Peninsula & Anor [2008] SASC 139

8. Whether a condition is valid

• District Council of Lower v Allen [2007] SASC 333

9. What should be considered when there is an attempt to amend a previously approved development

• Vincent v [2007] SAERDC 62