DOCSLIB.ORG

Predatorprey Interactions Between the South Polar Skua Catharacta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Predatorprey Interactions Between the South Polar Skua Catharacta Journal of Avian Biology 44: 089–095, 2013 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2012.05731.x © 2013 The Authors. Journal of Avian Biology © 2013 Nordic Society Oikos Subject Editor: Thomas Alerstam. Accepted 31 October 2012 Predator–prey interactions between the South Polar skua Catharacta maccormicki and Antarctic tern Sterna vittata Karel Weidinger and Václav Pavel K. Weidinger ([email protected]) and V. Pavel, Dept of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Faculty of Science, Palacky Univ., Tr Svobody 26, CZ-771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic . Antarctic terns have to co-exist in a limited space with their major nest predator, the skuas. We conducted artificial nest experiments to evaluate the roles of parental activity, nest location and nest and egg crypsis in this simple predator–prey system. Predation on artificial (inactive) nests was higher in traditional nesting sites than in sites previously not occupied by terns, which suggests that skuas memorized past tern breeding sites. Predation on artificial nests in inactive colonies was higher than in active (defended) colonies. Parental defense reduced predation in colonies to the level observed in artificial nests placed away from colonies. This suggests that communal defense can balance the costs of attracting preda- tors to active colonies. Within colonies, predation was marginally higher on experimental eggs put in real nests than on bare ground. Although it seems that the presence of a nest is costly in terms of increased predation, reductions in nest size might be constrained by the need for protective nest structures and/or balanced by opposing selection on nest size. Predation did not differ markedly between artificial (quail) and real tern eggs. A simultaneous prey choice experiment showed that the observed predation rates reflected egg/nest detectability, rather than discrimination of egg types. In sum- mary, nesting terns probably cannot avoid being detected, and they cannot defend their nest by attending them. Yet, by temporarily leaving the nest, they can defend it through communal predator mobbing, and at the same time, they can benefit from crypsis of unattended nest and eggs. The role of predation risk in the evolution and/or However, from the perspective of less abundant prey species, main tenance of avian coloniality is still controversial the impact of predation can be more detrimental than for (Wittenberger and Hunt 1985, Siegel-Causey and more abundant and/or large species, where predation is Kharitonov 1990, Clode 1993, Kenyon et al. 2007, Sachs diluted by prey numbers (Brooke et al. 1999, Votier et al. et al. 2007, Varela et al. 2007). Nevertheless, currently 2004) and may be further reduced through nest defense observed nest predation patterns often suggest an adaptive (penguins; Young 1994) or selection of protected nest sites significance of colonial nesting in terms of increased breed- (some petrels; Varpe and Tveraa 2005). ing success. Seabirds, because of their prevalent habit of The Antarctic tern Sterna vittata is a circumpolar species group living, are a traditional model in studies of costs and breeding on sub-Antarctic islands and the Antarctic benefits associated with colonial breeding (Clode 1993). Peninsula to 68°S, in loose colonies containing from a few to Seabirds inhabiting species-poor polar areas offer an addi- hundreds of pairs. Both eggs and chicks suffer from heavy tional advantage of being relatively simple predator–prey avian predation and inclement weather, the overall nest systems, in particular species breeding in the Antarctic area, success being generally low and highly variable among where they have never been exposed to terrestrial predators. geographical locations, years, as well as between colonies The largest avian breeding aggregations in the Antarctic within a year (Kaiser et al. 1988, Parmelee 1992, Jabłoński are formed by penguins and petrels, whose eggs and chicks 1995, Higgins and Davies 1996, Casaux et al. 2008). Here, are the major terrestrial prey available to the local avian we report on nest predation in the Antarctic tern at the predators – skuas (Catharacta spp.; Parmelee 1992, Young southern border of its breeding range, where the species 1994, Weidinger 1998, Brooke et al. 1999, Van Franeker breeds close to its ecological limits. Terns co-exist here in a et al. 2001). Yet, the comparatively smaller colonies of limited space with their major avian predator, the South other Antarctic flying seabirds have received little attention Polar skua Catharacta maccormicki. in this respect (Parmelee and Maxson 1974, Kaiser et al. We conducted artificial nest experiments to evaluate 1988), possibly because they are – from the perspective of the respective roles of nest site location, nest and egg crypsis the predator (and also researcher) – a negligible prey source and parental activity in the predator–prey interaction (for a review of skua diet see Higgins and Davies 1996). between skuas and terns. Nesting terns probably cannot 89 avoid detection by skuas because of their conspicuous behav- with Japanese quail Coturnix japonica eggs as a surrogate ior and the good visibility of incubating birds against the for real tern eggs. The quail eggs were hardboiled and X-ray nest background. Yet, frequent changing of nesting sites sterilized just before transportation to Antarctica, to prevent between years (Parmelee 1992, Peter et al. 2008) and possi- pathogen transmission. These procedures did not influence bly re-nesting at different sites within a year (Parmelee 1992) the external appearance of the eggs. Quail eggs are cryptic suggest some benefit from the abandonment of previous (to the human eye), but smaller than tern eggs (32 25 vs breeding sites. This is to be expected if skuas remember and 46 33 mm). In addition to quail eggs, we also used a lim- revisit tern nesting sites once they are discovered. We asked ited number of real tern eggs that we collected from nests 1) whether artificial nests – without parental activity that that were found already abandoned by the time of our may disclose them to skuas – would be preyed upon at a arrival to the study area. All artificial nests contained one higher rate if they are located in inactive tern colonies egg, completed natural tern clutches contained on average compared to sites not previously occupied by nesting terns. 1.2 eggs (Weidinger and Pavel in press). We expected 2) that this effect, if present, would increase We defined the following experimental treatments with distance between the colony and the unoccupied site. (Appendix 1). (T1) un-manipulated active tern nests. (T2) Contrary to attracting predators’ attention, breeding quail eggs placed in already inactive real tern nests in aban- terns can actively defend their nests by communally doned colonies. We used all discovered current-year nests mobbing predators to drive them away from the colony within a particular colony/nest cluster, regardless the size (Parmelee and Maxson 1974, Jabłoński 1995, Whittam and of nest structure. (T3) quail eggs placed on a suitable sub- Leonard 2000). We thus also asked 3) whether artificial nests strate within inactive colonies. The sites were chosen as to in inactive colonies – without parental defense – would form pairs with T2 nests, separated from each other by a experience higher predation rates than defended nests in distance of 10 m. (T4, T5) tern and quail eggs, respectively, active colonies. Because incubating parents temporarily placed on suitable substrate in an alternating sequence at leave their nest to participate in mobbing, the attacking 10 m intervals; the transects were located 100 m from predator has to search for individual unattended nests the edge of inactive colonies. (T6) quail eggs placed on suit- within a colony. In such cases, cryptic eggs would offer a able substrate in transect at 10 m intervals; the transects selective advantage (Blanco and Bertellotti 2002, Sanchez were located 1 km from the nearest tern breeding sites et al. 2004). Because egg coloration may be selectively neu- (active or abandoned) and about 50 m from an active skua tral if predators detect nests before detecting eggs (Götmark nest. Deployment of artificial nests (T4, T5, T6) in transects 1993), we first asked 4) whether within a colony, experi- was dictated by logistical constraints. Although this spatial mental eggs placed in real nests would experience higher pre- pattern differs from that of natural nests, we believe this dation rate than eggs placed on bare substrate. Finally, did not influence foraging behaviour of skuas to a degree we asked 5) whether experimental eggs (presumably less that might invalidate the results. We suppose that skuas cryptic) would experience higher predation rates than real detect artificial nests one at a time during overflights, not by tern eggs, if both egg types are exposed on bare substrate, to walking between neigbouring nests. The 10 m interval was exclude any effects of the nest per se. chosen as to simulate the inter-nest distance in the core areas of real colonies (for account of nesting densities see Kaiser 1996 and Weidinger and Pavel in press). Material and methods The artificial nest treatments T2–T6 were designed to change a particular trait of real tern nests, while keeping Field work the other traits fixed. This allowed a comparison between pairs of treatments (referred to as contrasts C1–C5, here- The study was conducted at the James Ross Island, NE after; for definitions see the Appendix 1 and Fig. 1) to evalu- Antarctic Peninsula (JRI; within ca 13 km of the Johan ate the effect of each particular trait on predation rate. Gregor Mendel Station: 63°48′S, 57°53′W) during two To assess the effect of parental activity (C3), the T2 nests austral summers – from 1 January to 3 February 2009 and ideally should be compared with same artificial nests located from 3 to 27 January 2011. We mapped the distribution of within active tern colonies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BROWN SKUAS Stercorarius Antarcticus INCUBATE a MACARONI PENGUIN EUDYPTES CHRYSOLOPHUS EGG at MARION ISLAND
    Clokie & Cooper: Skuas incubate a Macaroni Penquin egg 59 BROWN SKUAS STERCORARIUS antarcticus INCUBATE A MACARONI PENGUIN EUDYPTES CHRYSOLOPHUS EGG AT MARION ISLAND LINDA CLOKIE1 & JOHN COOPER2,3 1Marine & Coastal Management Branch, Department of Environmental Affairs, Private Bag X2, Rogge Bay 8012, South Africa 2Animal Demography Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa 3DST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa ([email protected]) Received 3 October 2009, accepted 5 February 2010 Brown/Sub-antarctic Skua Stercorarius antarcticus are widely -sized for skua eggs, thus deemed to be the birds’ own clutch, but distributed at cool-temperate and sub-Antarctic islands in the the third was an all-white egg (Fig. 1). This egg was noticeably Southern Ocean, where their diet includes burrowing petrels caught larger than the two skua eggs, and was more rounded in shape. at night and eggs stolen from incubating birds, especially penguins, On 19 December when the nest was revisited one of the two skua during the day (Furness 1987, Higgins & Davies 1996, Shirihai eggs was no longer present. During visits on 21 December 2008 2007). At Marion Island, Prince Edward Islands in the southern and on 4 and 15 January 2009 only the white egg was present, and Indian Ocean, Brown Skua prey on eggs of crested penguins the displaced incubating bird was quick to defend its nest. On 9 Eudyptes sp. during summer months which they remove in their February 2009 the skua pair was still present at the nest, with one bills from the colonies by flying to nearby middens where the eggs’ bird in an incubating position, but the nest was empty of contents.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Primer
    Antarctic Primer By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller Designed by: Olivia Young, Aurora Expeditions October 2018 Cover image © I.Tortosa Morgan Suite 12, Level 2 35 Buckingham Street Surry Hills, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia To anyone who goes to the Antarctic, there is a tremendous appeal, an unparalleled combination of grandeur, beauty, vastness, loneliness, and malevolence —all of which sound terribly melodramatic — but which truly convey the actual feeling of Antarctica. Where else in the world are all of these descriptions really true? —Captain T.L.M. Sunter, ‘The Antarctic Century Newsletter ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 3 CONTENTS I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Guidance for Visitors to the Antarctic Antarctica’s Historic Heritage South Georgia Biosecurity II. THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Antarctica The Southern Ocean The Continent Climate Atmospheric Phenomena The Ozone Hole Climate Change Sea Ice The Antarctic Ice Cap Icebergs A Short Glossary of Ice Terms III. THE BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Life in Antarctica Adapting to the Cold The Kingdom of Krill IV. THE WILDLIFE Antarctic Squids Antarctic Fishes Antarctic Birds Antarctic Seals Antarctic Whales 4 AURORA EXPEDITIONS | Pioneering expedition travel to the heart of nature. CONTENTS V. EXPLORERS AND SCIENTISTS The Exploration of Antarctica The Antarctic Treaty VI. PLACES YOU MAY VISIT South Shetland Islands Antarctic Peninsula Weddell Sea South Orkney Islands South Georgia The Falkland Islands South Sandwich Islands The Historic Ross Sea Sector Commonwealth Bay VII. FURTHER READING VIII. WILDLIFE CHECKLISTS ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 5 Adélie penguins in the Antarctic Peninsula I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Antarctica is the largest wilderness area on earth, a place that must be preserved in its present, virtually pristine state.
    [Show full text]
  • Pirates of the Oceans 12 13 13 14 Skuas Are the Pirates of the Bird World
    1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 SKUAS 9 10 10 11 11 12 Pirates of the oceans 12 13 13 14 Skuas are the pirates of the bird world. Like gulls with a killer 14 15 15 16 instinct,instinct, skuasskuas shareshare manymany characterscharacters withwith terrestrialterrestrial birdsbirds ofof prey,prey, allow-allow- 16 17 17 18 inging interestinginteresting insightsinsights intointo thethe biologybiology ofof birdbird predators.predators. 18 19 19 20 InIn thisthis feature,feature, thethe FitzPatrickFitzPatrick Institute’sInstitute’s PeterPeter RyanRyan exploresexplores thethe 20 21 21 22 varied and often contradictory world of skuas. 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 35 35 36 36 37 37 38 38 39 A pair of Sub-Antarctic 39 40 Skuas giving the 40 41 characteristic long- 41 42 call display with 42 43 raisedraised wings.wings. 43 44 ONNO HUYSER 44 45 45 46 46 47 47 48 48 49 49 50 50 51 51 52 52 53 53 54 54 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 61 61 62 62 63 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 ONNO HUYSER WARWICK TARBOTON 18 18 19 Above A pair of Sub-Antarctic Skuas sitting peacefully next to a dozing Chinstrap Penguin Pygoscelis antarctica, but other birds 19 20 have to watch out when skuas are around, or they may find themselves losing a meal, their eggs and chicks, or even their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Washington and Silverfish Bay Are Located in Northern Terra Nova Bay, Victoria Land, Ross Sea
    Measure 17 (2013) Annex Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No. 173 Cape Washington & Silverfish Bay Northern Terra Nova Bay Ross Sea Introduction Cape Washington and Silverfish Bay are located in northern Terra Nova Bay, Victoria Land, Ross Sea. Approximate area and coordinates: 286 km2 (centered at 164° 57.6' E, 74° 37.1' S), of which 279.5 km2 is marine (98 %) and 6.5 km2 is terrestrial (2 %). The primary reasons for designation of the Area are the outstanding ecological and scientific values. One of the largest emperor penguin (Aptenodytes forsteri) colonies in Antarctica breeds on sea ice adjacent to Cape Washington, with around 20,000 breeding pairs comprising approximately eight percent of the global emperor population and ~21% of the population in the Ross Sea. Several factors, such as location, ice conditions, weather and accessibility provide relatively consistent and stable opportunities to observe emperor chick fledging reliably and the presence of a variety of other species make it an ideal place to study ecosystem interactions. The extended record of observations of the emperor colony at Cape Washington is of important scientific value. Approximately 20 km west of Cape Washington, the first documented ‘nursery’ and hatching area for Antarctic silverfish (Pleuragramma antarcticum) is located at Silverfish Bay. Recent research has shown that the concentration of spawning on occasions extends all the way across the embayment to Cape Washington. The first ground-breaking studies on the life-history of this species have been made at the site, and its relative accessibility to nearby research stations make the Area important for biological research.
    [Show full text]
  • Skuas and Jaegers:A Guide to the Skuas and Jaegers of the World, Byklaus Mallingolsen and Hars Larsson.1997
    BOOK REVIEWS Peru.The distinctiveeastern Pacific race granti (a candidatefor speciesstatus!) of the MaskedBooby is ignoredin thetext butshown in Figure1, page115. The text implies that both sexesof the easternPacific race brewsteriof the Brown Boobyhave a whitishhood when only the maledoes, and sex-specific differences in bare-partcolors of BrownBoobies are overlooked(a pairof brewsteriis shown in Figure4, page116). I hope infomationfor otherareas of the worldis better. The unhelpfulword "jizz"is often usedas a convenientway to avoiddescribing featuresthat have a structuralbasis; indeed, these days jizz seemsincreasingly to be usedas a synonymfor structure.The continueduse of archaicterms such as "adult breeding"(arguably better than summer/winter) does little to helpan understandingof moltsand plumagesand can be inherentlymisleading. For example,contrast the "breeding"and "nonbreeding"plumages of Xantus' Murreletwith the photo of Craveri'sMurrelet, which lacksany seasonalmodifier. Fewphotographic bird guides are free from misidentified or mislabeledphotos, and thisone is no exception.I foundthe followingon a quickscan through, and I imagine thereare others:Figure 3 (page39) is a Southernnot NorthernGiant-Petrel; Figure 5 (page53) isa JuanFernandez Petrel not a De Filippi's(in fact, the same photo, with differentcropping, is usedon page59 for a JuanFernandez); Figure 12 (page117) isa Double-crestedCormorant, not a Brandt's;the upper(flying) bird in Figure8 (page 137) is an immatureGreat Frigatebird, not a Magnificent.Figure 3 (page33),
    [Show full text]
  • ANT 2014-2015 DBD with Maps 03-07-2013
    Day by Day Itinerary INTRODUCTION Antarctica Expedition Cruises 2014 / 2015 Antarctic Peninsula ‐ Falkland Islands ‐ South Georgia Atlantic Odyssey Itinerary All promoted itineraries are for general guidance only. Programs may vary depending on local ice and weather conditions and ad hoc decisions by the Expedition Leader to take advantage of opportunities to see wildlife. Flexibility is paramount for expedition cruises. Landings are always subJect to weather, local site availabilities and environmental regulations (IAATO). Official sailing plans and landing slots will be scheduled with IAATO approximately 5 months prior to the start of the season. The final sailing plan will be determined by the Expedition Leader on board. The implementation of the sailing plan is subject to the capability of the vessel and the discretion of the Master. Taking the exorbitant high fuel prices into account, it is agreed that Oceanwide Expeditions has the right to reduce the speed of the engines (including sailing on one engine) wherever possible, unless this affects the character of the intended voyage substantially and Jeopardizes the safety of the vessel, its crew, staff and passengers. Rubber Boots and Expedition Jackets Onboard Plancius & Ortelius all passengers are entitled to use a pair of sturdy rubber boots for free. Sizes need to be pre‐ ordered with our reservation departments at least 8 weeks prior to departure. A voucher will be sent with final travel documents approximately 4 weeks prior to departure. Laying claims on equipment items without pre‐order and voucher can not be accepted when boarding the vessel. Boots will need to be returned to the expedition team at the end of the voyage.
    [Show full text]
  • Skuasrefs V1.2.Pdf
    Introduction I have endeavoured to keep typos, errors, omissions etc in this list to a minimum, however when you find more I would be grateful if you could mail the details during 2017 to: [email protected]. Please note that this and other Reference Lists I have compiled are not exhaustive and are best employed in conjunction with other sources. Grateful thanks to Ashley Fisher (www.scillypelagics.com) and Kieran Fahy for the cover images. All images © the photographers. Joe Hobbs Index The general order of species follows the International Ornithologists' Union World Bird List (Gill, F. & Donsker, D. (eds.) 2017. IOC World Bird List. Available from: http://www.worldbirdnames.org/ [version 7.2 accessed April 2017]). Version Version 1.2 (May 2017). Cover Main Image: Pomarine Skua. At sea 6’ south of St. Mary’s, Isles of Scilly. 16th August 2008. Picture by Ashley Fisher. Vignette: Chilean Skua. At sea between Valparaiso and Puerto Montt, Chile. 3rd February 2009. Picture by Kieran Fahy. Species Page No. Arctic Skua [Stercorarius parasiticus] 16 Brown Skua [Stercorarius antarcticus] 8 Chilean Skua [Stercorarius chilensis] 4 Great Skua [Stercorarius skua] 10 Long-tailed Skua [Stercorarius longicaudus] 18 Pomarine Skua [Stercorarius pomarinus] 13 South Polar Skua [Stercorarius maccormicki] 5 1 Relevant Publications Bahr, N. 2011. The Bird Species / Die Vogelarten: systematics of the bird species and subspecies of the world. Volume 1: Charadriiformes. Media Nutur, Minden. Balmer, D. et al. 2013. Bird Atlas 2001-11: The breeding and wintering birds of Britain and Ireland. BTO Books, Thetford. Beaman, M. 1994. Palearctic birds: a checklist of the birds of Europe, North Africa and Asia north of the foothills of the Himalayas.
    [Show full text]
  • SKUA IDENTIFICATION by Simon Perkins Thus Far, the Only Two Skua
    SKUA IDENTIFICATION by Simon Perkins Thus far, the only two skua species that have been positively identified in the North Atlantic are Great Skua (Catharacta skua) and South Polar Skua (C. macormickii). These two species present one of the more difficult identification problems of any species pair. The reasons relate, in part, to their oceanic habits and to the fact that even to seagoers skuas rarely offer themselves to close scrutiny. Below, I review methods by which Great and South Polar skuas may be separated at sea, and report on two recent skua sightings in New England waters. Great Skua nests from April to August in the British Isles and Iceland and winters throughout the North Atlantic. South Polar Skua nests throughout coastal Antarctica from September to March and winters in our summer, primarily north of the equator in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. Therefore, most skuas that occur in New England waters in winter are probably Greats, while those in summer are probably South Polars. During spring and autumn, at a time when one species is returning to its breeding ground as the other is returning from its breeding grounds, the potential is greatest for seeing either skua species, and birders may be faced with the problem of distinguishing between the two. South Polar Skua is a polymorphic species that exhibits at least three distinct morphs, while Great Skua possesses only one known color morph. Light morph South Polar Skuas are essentially unmistakable being pale gray from the head and nape through the underparts. The darker morphs of South Polar more closely resemble the wholly brown plumage of the Great Skua, with the darkest morph being most similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Attemped Kleptoparasitism by a South Polar Skua on a Laysan Albatross Steve N
    FEATURED PHOTO ATTEMPED KLeptoparaSITISM BY A SOUTH POLAR SKUA ON A LAYSAN ALBatroSS STEVE N. G. HOWELL, P. O. Box 423, Bolinas, California 94924 DEBRA L. SHEARWATER, Shearwater Journeys, P. O. Box 190, Hollister, Cali- fornia 95024 As a group, the skuas and jaegers are well known as kleptoparasites, i.e., species that pirate food from other species. In general, the victimized species are smaller than the kleptoparasites, but sometimes victims are larger, the best-known instance of this being the Northern Gannet (Morus bassanus) relative to the Great Skua (Catharacta skua) (Furness 1987, Spear et al. 1999). Attacks by skuas on albatrosses have been reported on only a few occasions, but such attacks are rarely successful, and those noted to date have involved the relatively large Brown (or Subantarctic) Skua (C. antarctica) (Spear et al. 1999). At 12:50 on 30 September 2007, during an organized pelagic trip to Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary, we were watching birds flying at the stern of the boat when Howell noted an apparent South Polar Skua (C. maccormicki) ap- proaching the wake. (The specific identity of skuas off California remains uncertain, although most appear to be the South Polar; Howell 2005.) Birds in the wake of the boat included numerous Western Gulls (Larus occidentalis) and California Gulls (L. californicus), a few Pink-footed Shearwaters (Puffinus creatopus) and Black-footed Albatrosses (Phoebastria nigripes), and a single juvenile (aged by its uniformly fresh plumage and lack of smoky-gray auriculars) Laysan Albatross (P. immutabilis). We had already seen several skuas that day, some of which had made attacks on gulls and Pink-footed Shearwaters, the skua’s two commonest targets off central California in fall (pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to Seabirds: a Global Assessment 2 3 4 Authors: Maria P
    1 Threats to seabirds: a global assessment 2 3 4 Authors: Maria P. Dias1*, Rob Martin1, Elizabeth J. Pearmain1, Ian J. Burfield1, Cleo Small2, Richard A. 5 Phillips3, Oliver Yates4, Ben Lascelles1, Pablo Garcia Borboroglu5, John P. Croxall1 6 7 8 Affiliations: 9 1 - BirdLife International. The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street Cambridge CB2 3QZ UK 10 2 - BirdLife International Marine Programme, RSPB, The Lodge, Sandy, SG19 2DL 11 3 – British Antarctic Survey. Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, 12 Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK 13 4 – Centre for the Environment, Fishery and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33, UK 14 5 - Global Penguin Society, University of Washington and CONICET Argentina. Puerto Madryn U9120, 15 Chubut, Argentina 16 * Corresponding author: Maria Dias, [email protected]. BirdLife International. The David 17 Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street Cambridge CB2 3QZ UK. Phone: +44 (0)1223 747540 18 19 20 Acknowledgements 21 We are very grateful to Bartek Arendarczyk, Sophie Bennett, Ricky Hibble, Eleanor Miller and Amy 22 Palmer-Newton for assisting with the bibliographic review. We thank Rachael Alderman, Pep Arcos, 23 Jonathon Barrington, Igor Debski, Peter Hodum, Gustavo Jimenez, Jeff Mangel, Ken Morgan, Paul Sagar, 24 Peter Ryan, and other members of the ACAP PaCSWG, and the members of IUCN SSC Penguin Specialist 25 Group (Alejandro Simeone, Andre Chiaradia, Barbara Wienecke, Charles-André Bost, Lauren Waller, Phil 26 Trathan, Philip Seddon, Susie Ellis, Tom Schneider and Dee Boersma) for reviewing threats to selected 27 species. We thank also Andy Symes, Rocio Moreno, Stuart Butchart, Paul Donald, Rory Crawford, 28 Tammy Davies, Ana Carneiro and Tris Allinson for fruitful discussions and helpful comments on earlier 29 versions of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • South Polar Skua Breeding Populations in the Ross Sea Assessed from Demonstrated Relationship with Adélie Penguin Numbers
    South Polar Skua breeding populations in the Ross Sea assessed from demonstrated relationship with Adélie Penguin numbers Deborah J. Wilson, Philip O’B. Lyver, Terry C. Greene, Amy L. Whitehead, Katie M. Dugger, Brian J. Karl, James R. F. Barringer, et al. Polar Biology ISSN 0722-4060 Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-016-1980-4 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-016-1980-4 ORIGINAL PAPER South Polar Skua breeding populations in the Ross Sea assessed from demonstrated relationship with Ade´lie Penguin numbers 1 2 3 4 Deborah J. Wilson • Philip O’B. Lyver • Terry C. Greene • Amy L. Whitehead • 5 2 2 6 Katie M. Dugger • Brian J. Karl • James R. F. Barringer • Roger McGarry • 7 8 Annie M. Pollard • David G. Ainley Received: 20 October 2015 / Revised: 25 April 2016 / Accepted: 25 May 2016 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract In the Ross Sea region, most South Polar Skuas penguin pairs; 45 skua pairs).
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRIBUTION and LIFE HISTORY STUDIES of the SOUTH-POLAR SKUA by CARLR
    BIRD-BANDING A JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION VOL. XXXII OCTOBER,1961 No. 4 DISTRIBUTION AND LIFE HISTORY STUDIES OF THE SOUTH-POLAR SKUA By CARLR. EKLUND INTRODUCTION Skuasare in the Order Charadriiformes,and togetherwith jaegers of the genusStercorarius constitute the Family Stercorariidae.Taxon- omists disagree as to whether the skua comprisesa single bipolar speciesor whether it consistsof several speciesand sub-species.In this study four speciesare recognizedand all are classifiedin the bipolar genus Catharacta,with one speciesnormally inhabitifig the Northern Hemisphereand the other three the Southern. Theseinclude Catharactaskua, the great skuaof the NorthernHemisphere; 'C. chilen- sis t Saunders), the Chilean skua found generally in the temperate regions of South America; C. lonnbergi t Mathews), the brown skua which primarily inhabitsthe subantarcticareas; and C. maccormicki f Saunders},the south-polarskua which is confinedto Antarctica. This latter species,which is the subjectfor this study, has been commonly calledthe Antarcticskua as well as McCormick'sskua, but south-polar skua is the more common name and this term is followed. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This study was used as basis for a doctoral disserta- tion at the University of Maryland. Funds were initially provided by •he United Sta,tes National Committee--IGY of the National Academy of Sciences, and sub- sequent banding work was done through a grant provided by the National Science Foundati,on. Without this aid the study could never have been carried ont. Banding records are being kept by the United States ,Fish and Wildlife Service and this is gratefully acknowledged.Special thanks are due many personsfrom the United States as well as ot,her countries who so ably cooperatedin this interna- tional program with their banding and observationwork.
    [Show full text]