DOCSLIB.ORG

Ethical Issues in Forensic Engineering

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ethical Issues in Forensic Engineering PDHonline Course R144 (2 PDH) Ethical Issues in Forensic Engineering J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A., Fellow ASCE, Fellow AEI 2012 PDH Online | PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-6658 Phone: 703-988-0088 Fax: 703-481-9535 www.PDHonline.com www.PDHcenter.com An Approved Continuing Education Provider www.PDHcenter.com PDHonline Course R144 www.PDHonline.org Ethical Issues in Forensic Engineering J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A., Fellow ASCE, Fellow AEI CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. WHAT IS FORNESIC ENGINEERING? 3. FRAMING THE ETHICAL ISSUES 4. SYSTEMS OF LAW 5. LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR THINKERS 6. MATERIALISM 7. THE ETHICAL ISSUES 8. RESOLVING THE ETHICAL ISSUES 9. THE ROAD FORWARD © J. Paul Guyer 2012 Page 2 of 23 www.PDHcenter.com PDHonline Course R144 www.PDHonline.org 1. INTRODUCTION Professional engineers who have reached mid-career may have heard the term “forensic engineer” but do not know much about what a forensic engineer does. That is because forensic engineering is not an engineering discipline but a business enterprise connected to the legal industry in the United States. It is an enterprise that challenges the public and practicing professional engineers. 2. WHAT IS FORENSIC ENGINEERING? Here are some definitions from different sources: • Forensic engineering is the investigation of materials, products, structures or components that fail or do not operate or function as intended, causing personal injury or damage to property. The consequences of failure are dealt with by the law of product liability. • The application of accepted engineering practices and principles for discussion, debate, argumentative, or legal purposes. • Application of engineering methods in determination and interpretation of causes of damage to, or failure of, equipment, machines, or structures. • Forensic engineering is defined as the application of the art and science of engineering in matters which are in, or may possibly relate to, the jurisprudence system, inclusive of alternative dispute resolution. • Forensic engineering is the application of the art and science of engineering in the jurisprudence system, requiring the services of legally qualified professional engineers. Forensic engineering may include the investigation of the physical causes of accidents and other sources of claims and litigation, preparation of © J. Paul Guyer 2012 Page 3 of 23 www.PDHcenter.com PDHonline Course R144 www.PDHonline.org engineering reports, testimony at hearings and trials in administrative or judicial proceedings, and the rendition of advisory opinion to assist in the resolution of disputes affecting life or property. • Forensic engineering is the application of engineering principles to the investigation of failures or other performance problems. Forensic engineering also involves testimony on the findings of these investigations before a court of law or other judicial forum, when required. From these and other sources it is reasonable to conclude that forensic engineering is (a) a business enterprise and not an engineering discipline and (b) it is ancillary to the legal system in the United States. 2.1 FORENSIC ENGINEERING IS NOT AN ENGINEERING DISCIPLINE. Engineering is the art and science of applied physics. Training and practice in engineering is, for obvious reasons, structured consistent with the principles of physics. For example electrical engineering is the art and science of application of the physical principles of electricity. Mechanical engineering is the application of the physical principles of mechanics. And so forth. But there are no physical principles of “forensics.” 2.2 FORENSIC ENGINEERING IS A BUSINESS ENTERPRISE. Forensic engineering is a business enterprise. The objective of its practitioners is mercantile, that is, to earn money with which to buy the goods and services that will allow them to lead a secure, comfortable and enriching life. This is the reason people seek out and pursue jobs and careers. This is all perfectly reasonable. 2.3 FORENSIC ENGINEERING IS AN APPENDAGE OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES. © J. Paul Guyer 2012 Page 4 of 23 www.PDHcenter.com PDHonline Course R144 www.PDHonline.org Forensic engineers are participants in the legal system in the United States. This is clear from the quotations above and many other sources. For example…. • “the law of product liability” • “or legal purposes” • “interpretation of causes of damage” • “the jurisprudence system” • “application of the art and science of engineering in the jurisprudence system” • “of these investigations before a court of law or other judicial forum” 3. FRAMING THE ETHICAL ISSUES To address the ethical issues presented by a forensic engineer in a formal legal system (in the United States the “common law” system), it will be helpful to describe (a) the actors in a legal dispute generically and in customary common law terminology, and (b) the possible just and unjust outcomes that may result from the actions of a forensic engineer. Table 3-1 is a framework for the actors in a formal legal dispute. Table 3-2 is a framework for the possible just and unjust outcomes that may result from the actions of a forensic engineer. © J. Paul Guyer 2012 Page 5 of 23 www.PDHcenter.com PDHonline Course R144 www.PDHonline.org TABLE 3-1 DESCRIPTION OF PARTIES TO A DISPUTE IN A FORMAL LEGAL SYSTEM (COMMON LAW) GENERIC TERM AND DESCRIPTION LEGAL TERM JUDICIAL AUTHORITY – The person or JUDGE and/or JURY persons in a formal legal system who have the power to decide if a claim of damages is legitimate and compensation by the accused party of the accusing party is just. ACCUSING PARTY - The person or entity PLAINTIFF claiming to have been injured or damaged and to be entitled to compensation by the accused party. Accusing Party’s ADVOCATE – A person Plaintiff’s LAWYER hired by the accusing party to persuade the judicial authority to render a judgment favorable to the accusing party. Accusing Party’s FORENSIC ENGINEER – A Plaintiff’s EXPERT WITNESS professional engineer hired by the accusing party or the accusing party’s advocate to present technical evidence intended to persuade the judicial authority to render a judgment favorable to the accusing party. ACCUSED PARTY – The person or entity DEFENDANT accused of injuring or damaging the accusing party. Accused Party’s ADVOCATE – A person Defendant’s LAWYER hired by the accused party to persuade the judicial authority to render a judgment favorable to the accused party. Accused Party’s FORENSIC ENGINEER – A Defendant’s EXPERT WITNESS professional engineer hired by the accused party or the accused party’s advocate to present technical evidence intended to persuade the judicial authority to render a judgment finding the accusing party’s claim without merit. © J. Paul Guyer 2012 Page 6 of 23 www.PDHcenter.com PDHonline Course R144 www.PDHonline.org TABLE 3-2 POSSIBLE OUTCOMES THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE ACTIONS OF A FORENSIC ENGINEER IN A FORMAL LEGAL SYSTEM (COMMON LAW) JUST UNJUST JUDICIAL AUTHORITY may reach a just JUDICIAL AUTHORITY may reach an unjust conclusion and the accusing party is thereby conclusion and the accusing party is thereby justly compensated by the accused party unjustly enriched at the expense of the unjustly responsible for an injury or damages. accused party. FORENSIC ENGINEER may provide true, FORENSIC ENGINEER may provide false, complete, and unbiased technical testimony incomplete, and biased technical testimony and and evidence. evidence. FORENSIC ENGINEER has no pecuniary FORENSIC ENGINEER has a pecuniary interest in prevalence of the party upon whose interest in prevalence of the party upon whose behalf he provides testimony and evidence. behalf he provides testimony and evidence. Evidence provided by FORENSIC ENGINEER Evidence provided by FORENSIC ENGINEER does not influence or persuade unjustly influences or persuades unjustly accused party accused party to unjustly compensate accusing to unnecessarily compensate accusing party party because of prospective expense for because of prospective expense for accused accused party to seek just exoneration by the party to seek just exoneration by the judicial judicial authority. authority. A discussion of three social constructs will be helpful in understanding and addressing the ethical issues in forensic engineering. These are…. • Systems of Law: Civil/Common/Islamic • Linear and Non-Linear Thinkers: Rule driven versus goal driven • Materialism: The theory or attitude that physical well-being and worldly possessions constitute the greatest good and highest value in life. Let’s talk about these. Then we may better understand the ethical issues in © J. Paul Guyer 2012 Page 7 of 23 www.PDHcenter.com PDHonline Course R144 www.PDHonline.org forensic engineering and be better prepared to seek a resolution that is fair and reasonable to the public and the professional engineering community. The first is systems of law…. 4. SYSTEMS OF LAW There are three substantive legal systems in the world: • Civil Law • Common Law • Islamic Law A fourth system of law, observed in a limited number of countries, can be characterized as “bijuridical”, that is, a combination of Civil and Common Law. Figure 3-1 shows the distribution of these principal legal systems globally. Civil Law Common Law Bijuridical Law (a combination of Civil and Common Law) Islamic Law Figure 3-1 Systems of Law © J. Paul Guyer 2012 Page 8 of 23 www.PDHcenter.com PDHonline Course R144 www.PDHonline.org 4.1 CIVIL LAW. Civil law is the most widespread system of law in the world. Under Civil Law, the law-of-the-land is enunciated and approved by a duly constituted governmental body of appropriate authority (a parliament, congress, legislature, etc.) and thereupon codified (written-down and published in print or, in this day and age, in digital format). There are two important distinguishing characteristics of Civil Law: • The law is established and enunciated (written down) by an appropriately established governmental body (a parliament, congress, legislature, etc.), not by the exercise of the prerogative of individual judges.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae Traci K. Campbell, P.E., CXLT, Senior Engineer (850) 583-5513 · [email protected]
    Curriculum Vitae Traci K. Campbell, P.E., CXLT, Senior Engineer (850) 583-5513 · [email protected] Industrial Engineer with specialties in Industrial accident reconstruction, including Slip, trip and fall investigation and analysis; OSHA standards; ANSI and ASTM standards; building codes; workplace safety related issues; forklifts, construction machinery, appliances, and manufacturing equipment; product failure analysis ; vehicular accident reconstruction including automobile, trucks, tractor-trailers, and recreational vehicles. Special interests include amusement park and theme park accidents and safety related issues. Ms. Campbell is also a CXLT - Certified XL Tribometrist (slip index evaluation) and a certified counter balance forklift operator. EDUCATION 1993 Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering Florida State University PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2019 to present Quality Forensic Engineering, LLC, Tallahassee, FL Senior Engineer 2001 to 2019 BEC Consulting, LLC, Tallahassee, FL (Formerly Benedict Engineering Company, Tallahassee, FL) Senior Consulting Engineer 1999 to 2001 General Motors Corporation, Warren, MI Senior Industrial Engineer 1998 to 1999 General Motors Corporation, Shanghai, China Lean Manufacturing International Service Assignment 1998 to 1998 General Motors Corporation, Lake Orion, MI Industrial Engineer 1996 to 1998 General Motors Corporation, Atlanta, GA Industrial Engineer 1993 to 1996 Stanadyne Automotive Corp., Tallahassee, FL Industrial Engineer/Buyer LICENSES, REGISTRATIONS, and CERTIFICATIONS No.
    [Show full text]
  • Project-Based Learning in a Forensic Engineering Course
    Paper ID #17245 Project-based Learning in a Forensic Engineering Course Dr. Mansoor Nasir, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Mansoor Nasir received his B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of California-Berkeley. He worked as a research scientist at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C. before joining the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He has several publications in the areas of microflu- idics, chemical and biological sensors, and MEMS technology. He is also passionate about engineering pedagogy. He has not only published articles on engineering education but has also led several workshops on using instructional methodologies that make classroom instruction more engaging and effective. Dr. Eric G Meyer, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Meyer directs the Experimental Biomechanics Laboratory (EBL) at LTU with the goal of advanc- ing experimental biomechanics understanding. Dr. Meyer teaches Introduction to Biomechanics, Tissue Mechanics, Engineering Applications in Orthopedics, and Foundations of Medical Imaging. He has been an active member of the engineering faculty committee that has redesigned the Foundations of Engi- neering Design Projects course that is required for all freshmen in the College of Engineering at LTU. This committee is currently designing a new sophomore-level Engineering Entrepreneurship Studio that will also be required for all students as a continuation of the ”Foundations Studio.” He has published 33 peer-reviewed journal and conference proceeding articles. At LTU, Meyer offers a number of outreach programs for high school students and advises many projects for undergraduate students. Brian Thomas Weaver PE, Explico Engineering Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Engineering
    Forensic Engineering Committed to Technical Excellence Only the most highly skilled and well renowned engineers are selected to be a part of Stress Engineering Services’ forensic engineering practice. FROM EVENT TO TESTIMONY Tackling complex and technical subject matters and presenting them in a clear and conclusive manner is what we do best. We have unrivaled experience in evidence collection and documentation, failure analysis, materials testing, full-scale incident recreation and litigation support and our forensic engineering services cover accident investigations, fire origins and cause, intellectual property, product liability and personal injury. BACKED BY COMPREHENSIVE TESTING SERVICES The foundation of our forensic services rests on our full-scale laboratory and field testing capabilities. Quite simply, our extensive testing capabilities combined with our design and analysis experience are unsurpassed. We enable a wide cross-section of industries, along with the legal community, to reliably replicate environments and conditions to re-create situations of choice. Tests for motions, temperature, force, vibration, pressure, torque, aging, etc. can be performed under reliable, controllable conditions. With such high quality facilities, technical expertise and knowledge of industry equipment to hand, our forensic engineering practice serves as a valuable resource for today’s most pressing forensic engineering issues. INDEPENDENCE IS POWER By operating as an independent engineering consulting company, not owned by or affiliated with any other corporations, insurance companies or legal entities, Stress Engineering Services is free to rapidly deliver the most objective and reliable results available to its customers. Our priority is to truly listen to our customers’ needs, effectively assess their individual problems and combine the right skills and resources to solve challenges in a timely manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Forensic Engineering
    Overview of Forensic Engineering Prof. Dr. Azlan Ab. Rahman Forensic Engineering Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Definition Forensic (fo ren' sik) - the application of knowledge to questions of civil and criminal law. Forensic engineering is the application of engineering principles and methodologies to answer questions of fact. Forensic engineering is essentially a failure analysis program for litigation support. The goal of such a program is to positively identify the sequence of events leading to ultimate failure. Forensic Engineering Definition • From Latin : forensis meaning “public” – Belonging to courts of law – Pertaining to or fitted for legal or public argumentation • Forensic Engineering – a science concerned with relations between engineering and the law Floor Slab Collapse Collapse of third floor slab under construction at KL Central. Tuesday 11am, October 11th, 2011. Two workers injured. Bungalow Renovation Work October 19th, 2012. Section 7, Shah Alam. One worker died and 5 critically injured when the concrete slab collapsed. The owner is facing the risk of legal action for not having the renovation permit from Shah Alam City Council as per Section 70(1) of the Akta Parit, Jalan dan Bangunan 1974. Collapse of Scaffolding in Stadium Repair Work Collapse of Stadium Sultan Mizan, Collapse of the scaffolding of repair Terengganu in 2008 work on the same stadium in 2013, February 20th, 11.30am. Two workers injured (broken legs). Collapse of Supermarket Upgrading Construction May 29th, 2009. Collapse of ne-third section of renovation and upgrading work on 35-year old Jaya Supermarket building, Section SS14 PJ. Three workers died and two critically injured.
    [Show full text]
  • ASTM Volume 14.02, July 2017
    ASTM Volume 14.02, July 2017 Particle and Spray Characterization; Forensic Sciences; Accreditation & Certifcation; Forensic Psychophysiology; Nanotechnology; Forensic Engineering Table of Contents E11-17 Standard Specification for Woven Wire Test Sieve Cloth and Test Sieves E161-12 Standard Specification for Precision Electroformed Sieves E323-11(2016) Standard Specification for Perforated-Plate Sieves for Testing Purposes E444-09 Standard Guide for Scope of Work of Forensic Document Examiners E454-12(2016) Standard Specification for Industrial Perforated Plate and Screens (Square Opening Series) E541-10 Standard Specification for Agencies Engaged in System Analysis and Compliance Assurance for Manufactured Building E620-11 Standard Practice for Reporting Opinions of Scientific or Technical Experts E674-12(2016) Standard Specification for Industrial Perforated Plate and Screens (Round Opening Series) E678-07(2013) Standard Practice for Evaluation of Scientific or Technical Data E699-16 Standard Specification for Agencies Involved in Testing, Quality Assurance, and Evaluating of Manufactured Building Components E799-03(2015) Standard Practice for Determining Data Criteria and Processing for Liquid Drop Size Analysis E860-07(2013)e1 Standard Practice for Examining And Preparing Items That Are Or May Become Involved In Criminal or Civil Litigation E1020-13e1 Standard Practice for Reporting Incidents that May Involve Criminal or Civil Litigation E1188-11(2017) Standard Practice for Collection and Preservation of Information and Physical Items
    [Show full text]
  • Uncompromising Forensic Engineering Finding Solutions Since 1959 Trident – Your Trusted Resource for Forensic Engineering Solutions
    RESPONDING DELIVERING SATISFYING Uncompromising Forensic Engineering Finding Solutions Since 1959 Trident – Your Trusted Resource for Forensic Engineering Solutions When you need answers to what, why, when and how things went When needed, our experts will offer recommendations to solve the problem. wrong, our team at Trident Engineering Associates, Inc., is ready to serve In addition, we’re highly experienced in providing accurate, authoritative legal your individual needs. Our reliable, professional experts uncover the facts testimony and will support you from beginning to end if long-term litigation and secure the answers you require, delivering them accurately, rapidly, and is required. in an easy-to-understand report. You will benefit from our vast technical PROVIDING UNEQUALLED SERVICE knowledge and strong commitment to objectivity and professional service. Client needs are our highest priority, and We want you to achieve the highest level of comfort, security and success we ensure you efficient, quality service working with our team. Let us be your trusted resource. through three guiding principles: SATISFYING BUILDING FROM A STRONG FOUNDATION RESPONDING ▲ With one Professionally Ethically Founded in 1959 by several senior U.S. Naval Academy scientific faculty simple call or click, we match our members, our company is named Trident top-caliber experts to your Engineering to reflect the sea, our naval roots, and requirements. We respond our collective wisdom, strength, and leadership. quickly to our insurance, legal, We initially focused on product research and and government client inquiries. RESPONDING DELIVERING Quickly Reliably development for government agencies and private And, we investigate your cases Efficiently Convincingly industry; however, as occupational safety, product immediately and efficiently, liability, and consumer protection issues surfaced, our saving you time and money.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 ETLI Speakers Biographies
    1 Engineering Technology Leaders Institute (ETLI) 2019 “Engineering Technology Leaders: Taking the Next Steps” Speakers Biographies Miriam Quintal, Lewis-Burke Associates LLC Miriam Quintal, a senior Consultant at Lewis-Burke Associates, boasts a decade of advocacy and client success at Lewis-Burke, managing the federal relations portfolios for large academic institutions, scientific societies, and facility management organizations. Miriam fiercely protects client priorities, leveraging her unique combination of scientific training with political insight. Her wealth of knowledge and federal research enterprise acumen provides value to all components of client interests: supporting university leadership, shepherding research initiatives, and shaping policy across a range of issues. Recent advocacy efforts include successfully guiding large-scale science projects through the appropriations process, restoring funding for key programs proposed to be eliminated in the President’s budget request, establishing new agency funding for research infrastructure, and creating opportunities for clients to showcase research and leadership in Administration initiative areas. Miriam co-leads the firm’s National Science Foundation practice and works closely with the higher education and research advocacy community to champion the Foundation. Bill Ruch, Lewis-Burke Associates LLC Bill Ruch works closely with clients to develop and carry out targeted federal relations strategies across a diverse range of issue sets. Bill’s portfolio covers federal interests across the research and development 2 spectrum, from the social and behavioral sciences and STEM education models to the transition of applied technologies and advancement of workforce development strategies. His day-to-day can include providing in- depth analysis on federal trends, targeted advocacy on Capitol Hill and at federal agencies, and coalition building with relevant stakeholders to bolster messaging.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation of Forensic Science and Bioengineering; Forensic Engineering
    International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science (IJRES) ISSN (Online): 2320-9364, ISSN (Print): 2320-9356 www.ijres.org Volume 9 Issue 8 ǁ 2021 ǁ PP. 61-64 Correlation of Forensic Science and Bioengineering; Forensic Engineering Abhijith Abhilash, Varappallil Department of forensic science, Jain university, Kochi, Kerala, India. Abstract The aim of this paper is to analyse the relationship between forensic science and bioengineering. Forensic engineering can be confidential as a technical discipline or more precisely as one of applied technical sciences where the main focus is on investigating the causes, the course and costs of negative technical phenomena in various fields. These phenomena are quantitatively analysed, interpreted and clarified for the proceeding’s purposes before the state authorities, most often in criminal and civil proceedings. In terms of current development, the interdisciplinarity is becoming progressively important. Basically, here combine seemingly disparate scientific fields that have good hypothetical basis. The main task of the forensic engineering scientific development now is mainly the building of new specific disciplines while maintaining the quality the theoretical foundations of the original disciplines. Keywords: Bioengineering, Forensic engineering, relationship between forensic science and engineering. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Submission: 23-07-2021 Date of acceptance:
    [Show full text]
  • Steven P. Hotaling, Ph.D. Curriculum Vitae
    Dr. S.P. Hotaling Erdős number 4 Einstein number 5 Academic CV April 2018 1 43947 Cheltenham Circle, Ashburn VA 20147 703-220-4605 [email protected] Steven P. Hotaling, Ph.D. Curriculum Vitae Senior consultant to the U.S. government and industry. Big Data Analytics, Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence. Focus: Large, Complex Systems including those exhibiting multidimensional, stochastic, nonlinear behaviors. Effective communicator of complex mathematics, physics, engineering and data science to the c-suite. Leads interdisciplinary/multinational teams as well as performing in-depth individual analysis. Deep background in Data Analysis, Mathematical Physics and Strategic Research & Development, Program Design, Implementation and Operational Support. Hyperlinked Table of Contents Core Competencies Professional Experience Recent Cyber Security Sampling of selected analytical toolsets used Senior Scientist, Stellar Solutions National Intelligence Community Support through DOD and NRO (Aerospace, TASC, USAF) Selected Senior Leadership Consultation Satellite Systems Engineering TECH SIGINT Interdisciplinary Science and Technology Programs Regional Studies: Analysis, and Operational Support Asia Pacific Eurasia, including South West Asia (SWA) Middle East-North Africa (MENA), Sub-Saharan Africa and the Levant USAF, Chief, Non-Traditional Sciences Nuclear and Condensed Matter Physics Nuclear, Chemical, Biological, Radiological, RF, Laser and WMD Studies Counter Proliferation Analysis, CBRN+missiles – Crisis Leadership and geopolitical
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Sciences; Accreditation Certification; Forensic Psychophysiology; Nanotechnology; Forensic Engineering Table of Contents
    ASTM Volume 14.02, July 2019 Particle and Spray Characterization; Forensic Sciences; Accreditation Certification; Forensic Psychophysiology; Nanotechnology; Forensic Engineering Table of Contents Standard Number Title 1 E11-17 Standard Specification for Woven Wire Test Sieve Cloth and Test Sieves 2 E161-17 Standard Specification for Electroformed Material and Test Sieves 3 E323-11(2016) Standard Specification for Perforated-Plate Sieves for Testing Purposes 4 E454-12(2016) Standard Specification for Industrial Perforated Plate and Screens (Square Opening Series) 5 E620-18 Standard Practice for Reporting Opinions of Scientific or Technical Experts 6 E674-12(2016) Standard Specification for Industrial Perforated Plate and Screens (Round Opening Series) 7 E678-07(2013) Standard Practice for Evaluation of Scientific or Technical Data Standard Specification for Agencies Involved in Testing, Quality Assurance, and Evaluating of 8 E699-16 Manufactured Building Components 9 E799-03(2015) Standard Practice for Determining Data Criteria and Processing for Liquid Drop Size Analysis Standard Practice for Examining And Preparing Items That Are Or May Become Involved In 10 E860-07(2013)e2 Criminal or Civil Litigation 11 E1020-13e1 Standard Practice for Reporting Incidents that May Involve Criminal or Civil Litigation Standard Practice for Collection and Preservation of Information and Physical Items by a 12 E1188-11(2017) Technical Investigator Standard Test Method for Determining Liquid Drop Size Characteristics in a Spray Using Optical 13 E1260-03(2015)
    [Show full text]
  • Lino CV I One Page
    MR. ADELINO YUNG, P.E. Board-Certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering by the National Academy of Forensic Engineers Board-Licensed Professional Engineer (Tennessee, New Mexico, Texas) BIOMECHANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LLC 5090 RICHMOND AVENUE, PMB 99 n HOUSTON, TX 77056 n 713.650.8200 (VOICE) n 713.650.8210 (FAX) ________________________ FORMAL PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION · CORNELL UNIVERSITY, ITHACA, NY (1995-1996) Graduate studies in Biological Engineering · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, COLLEGE STATION, TX (1993-1995) Master of Science in Bioengineering Master’s Thesis - Effect of Football Helmet Energy Absorption Mechanisms on the Mitigation of Cervical Spinal Injuries: A Mathematical Model · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, EAST LANSING, MI (1987-1992) Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering ACADEMIC HONORS · Cornell-Whitaker Foundation Fellowship (1996) · Cornell Biological Engineering Research Assistantship (1995-1996) · Texas A&M Board of Regents Fellowship (1993-1994) · Texas A&M Bioengineering Teaching Assistantship (1993-1995) · State of Michigan Competitive Scholarship (1987-1991) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE · BIOMECHANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LLC; HOUSTON, TX Biomechanical Engineer (March 1998 - present) · BILLY COX & ASSOCIATES - ACCIDENT ANALYSIS ENGINEERS; HOUSTON, TX Manager, Biomedical Engineering Department (July 1996 - March 1998) · CORNELL UNIVERSITY – BIOLOGICAL & AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING DEPT.; ITHACA, NY Graduate Research Assistant (August 1995 - August 1996) · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY – BIOENGINEERING DEPT.; COLLEGE STATION, TX
    [Show full text]
  • RUHI ARSLANOGLU, PH.D. Biomedical Engineer / Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering
    RUHI ARSLANOGLU, PH.D. Biomedical Engineer / Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Investigates and analyzes injuries from a biomechanical and biomedical perspective; determines how injuries were caused; evaluates design and use of medical equipment, devices and implants. Assesses Injuries: Applies physics, anatomy and physiology principals to assess: • traumatic brain injuries and skull fractures; • neck, back and spinal cord injuries; • orthopedic and neurologic injuries; • vascular ruptures; • abdominal organs; • heart, lungs, skin (including burns) and other organs; • musculo-skeletal injuries including joints (i.e., shoulders, knees, ankles and elbows), soft tissues (i.e., rotator cuff, tendons and ligaments), and fracture patterns (torso, long bone, hand, foot or skull). Determines Cause: Applies engineering principles to determine: • the manner in which tissue failed: the type of loading, the direction of loading and magnitude or size of the load that caused the injury; • if injury patterns are causally related or consistent with the hazardous condition or circumstances claimed; • whether there was sufficient force in the right direction to cause an injury; • the presence of pre-existing conditions and how they affect the injury; • who and/or what action contributed to the injuries; • what could have been done to prevent the injuries. Typical Personal Injury Cases Involve: • motor vehicle collisions; • slips, trips and falls; • medical malpractice or device failures; • occupational and work place injuries; • sports and recreational injuries. 03/16/20 1 www.robsonforensic.com RUHI ARSLANOGLU, PH.D. Biomedical Engineer / Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2011 to Robson Forensic, Inc. present Associate Provide technical investigations, analysis, reports, and testimony toward the resolution of personal injury litigation involving injury analysis and causation, medical equipment, medical devices, and procedures.
    [Show full text]