Energy Focus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Energy Focus Volume 33 Number 2 SNP Energy policy – Callum McCaig MP July 2016 The abolition of DECC – Statement from Angus MacNeil The new department – Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy ENERGY FOCUS Didcot DECC demolished DBEIS rises from the ashes This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its committees. All-Party Parliamentary Groups are informal groups of Members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in Energy Focus are those of the individual organisations and contributors and do not necessarily represent the views held by the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies. The journal of The All-Party Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies Established in 1980, the Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies remains the only All-Party Parliamentary Group representing the entire energy industry. We champion cross-sector energy research and development. The Group’s membership is comprised of over 100 parliamentarians, 100 associate bodies from the private, public and CHAIRMAN’S charity sectors and a range of individual members. Published three times a year, Energy Focus records the Group’s activities, tracks key energy and environmental developments through parliament, presents articles from leading industry contributors and provides insight into the views and interests of both parliamentarians and officials. FOREWORD Executive Council Chairman Ian Liddell-Grainger MP Officers Rt Hon Lord Hunt of Kings Heath OBE | Ian Lavery MP | Lord O’Neill of Clackmannan Lord Oxburgh | Neil Parish MP | Lord Skelmersdale European Officer Ian Duncan MEP Membership Lead Robert Lane CBE Executive Council Christopher Chope OBE MP | Julie Elliott MP | Martin Fry | Ian Graves | Dr Simon Harrison | James Heappey MP Louise Kingham OBE | Joan MacNaughton CB | Paul Needley | Albert Owen MP | Chris Pincher MP | Michael Roberts OBE | Ruth Thompson OBE | Stephen Vaughan | Barbara Vest | Simon Virley | Graham Ward CBE | Dr Eilidh Whiteford MP | John Wybrew OBE Disclaimer: The views expressed in Energy Focus are those of individual organisations and contributors and do not necessarily represent the views held by members of the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies. Contents Every time I start this foreword, I write that we live in interesting times, but the past few months Foreword 3 have been like no other – and certainly interesting for both UK energy policy, and for PGES. Ian Liddell–Grainger MP, Chairman of PGES Decarbonising Heat: Green Gas 4 However, I must add a personal sad note to reflect on the loss of David Jefferies CBE, who died Mike Foster, Chief Executive – Energy & Utility Alliance (MARCH SPEAKER MEETING) earlier this year. It was with great sadness that we heard of the loss of David, who was a founding member of the group, was elected as a Life Member many years ago and served on Executive Decarbonising Heat: Supply of Renewable Gas 6 Council until his death in March. We will miss both him and his insight, charm and kindness. Tony Nixon, Strategy and Innovation Manager – National Grid (MARCH SPEAKER MEETING) Decarbonising Heat: What nest for the gas Grid? 8 This edition of Energy Focus is being published as the repercussions of the EU Referendum result Neil Schofield, Head of External Affairs – Worcester Bosch (MARCH SPEAKER MEETING) to leave Europe are still being felt. We have a new Prime Minister, will have elections for the Leader of the Opposition, a new leader of UKIP, a new leader of the Green Party. DECC has been Academic Review - the future for energy 10 dismantled and a new department created, the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Professor David Elmes, Warwick University (APRIL SPEAKER MEETING) Strategy. Academic Review - the energy trilemma 12 Professor Gavin Gillmore, Kingston University (APRIL SPEAKER MEETING) Energy is bound to be affected by at least some of this. Academic Review - Change Ahead: Energy for Transport 14 The Group is well placed to be at the heart of helping energy policy makers to access the Doctor Adam Chase, E4Tech (for Imperial College) (APRIL SPEAKER MEETING) knowledge and understanding that is in the energy industry and academia. Our programme for the SNP Energy Policy 16 remainder of the year includes some important speakers as well as our House of Lords Dinner, Callum McCaig MP, SNP Energy Spokesman (MAY SPEAKER MEETING) which will be preceded by a new PGES Energy Policy Workshop. PGES Summer Reception 18 That’s why, whatever the future may hold for UK energy with the UK separate from the EU, I am Obituary - David Jefferies, CBE, CCMI, FREng, FIEE 20 confident that the Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies, along with its members, will be at the forefront of the policy discussion. Statement from Angus McNeil MP 21 Chairman, Select Committee on Energy & Climate Change, on the abolition of DECC Ian Liddell-Grainger MP Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy 22 The full list of ministerial responsibilities in the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Chairman, PGES An All-Party Parliamentary Group Departmental Statements 24 Written and oral statements Parliamentary Record 27 Select Committees, oral questions, debates and legislation ISSN 0265-1734 For non-members, annual subscription rate is £65.00, single copies £27.00 Members receive a complimentary copy as part of membership to the Group Copyright 2016 2 Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies. All rights reserved. None of the articles or addresses in this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval 3 system or transmitted in any form, by any means., electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the Copyright owner. Printed in Great Britain by First Colour Ltd, London. a range of green gases. Perhaps of waste gives the gas its “green” study into 100 per cent hydrogen “low carbon” gas is a better credentials. The Swindon plant through the gas grid. Their Leeds DECARBONISING description. First off the blocks envisages supplying gas for HGVs 21 study is arousing considerable is biomethane. This is the gas but there is nothing to stop it interest within the industry on the captured from waste processing, being fed into the gas grid for basis that it envisages using the typically anaerobic digestion. everyday use once it is blended to existing gas grid, conventional HEAT: GREEN GAS The technology is proven, it has reach the gas quality standards heating systems such as central worked for years. Companies required. heating in the home but in a like Severn Trent clean up the completely carbon free way. biomethane from their Minworth Another “green” gas is hydrogen, Mike Foster, Chief Executive – Energy & Utility Alliance sewerage works and inject the currently produced from natural This article is not designed to “green” gas into the grid. gas using Steam Methane reach the conclusion that one [email protected] Reforming, where the carbon can single option can solve the UK’s BioSNG is next; a “green” gas then be captured. The question energy trilemma, there is no that achieves its status because is how much hydrogen can be silver bullet. However, green MARCH SPEAKER MEETING: Address to the All-Party it uses waste materials, usually used and in what manner? It gas, whatever the source, offers sent to landfill or incineration, is possible, within existing gas a viable way forward using our Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies to create the gas. The process is quality guidelines, to mix up to existing gas infrastructure. It technically complex, it involves 2 per cent of hydrogen into the means not turning our back on Advanced Plasma technology. blend that flows through the gas but embracing it. Overall, Ofgem have recently awarded gas grid. Some studies suggest it could prove to be the most National Grid funding to develop that up to 20 per cent might be cost effective way of keeping a commercial scale plant in feasible – remember this makes people warm and meeting our Swindon, having seen the the overall mix of gas “greener”. international climate change success of smaller trials of the However, Northern Gas Networks obligations. technology. The alternative use are conducting a feasibility King Canute could not turn back As a result of natural gas that. Switching away from gas the tides; he acknowledged his abundance, the UK has the heating will mean households powers were limited. Similarly, world’s leading gas grid face considerable up-front costs, UK politicians must recognise infrastructure in place, directly which are simply unaffordable. that our geographic location, supplying the energy to heat 85 A recent study of Bridgend, climate and weather patterns per cent of UK homes. It would produced by Wales and West are major determinants of future be a travesty not to use this Utilities, suggest that 81 per cent energy policy and that they can existing infrastructure as part of of households simply do not have Half-hourly Heat and Electricity Demand try but will fail to alter them. The the solution to the trilemma, and the cash at their disposal to make energy trilemma, a phrase that “green” gas could be the key. that investment, without massive rightly suggests the difficulty subsidies. in balancing the competing Heat demand is seasonal, no demands of affordability, surprise there, but its peaks There is no definition of what reliability and sustainability, during the winter either need to “green” gas is; indeed this is part should be set against the UK’s be met by supply, or people will of the attraction in that there is no particular energy needs. go cold, and no politician wants winner or silver bullet but instead 4 5 biomass-rich waste-derived The journey to decarbonising heat capture and storage the hydrogen fuels, followed by cooling, produced under this process cleaning and polishing.
Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee ENERGY BILL [LORDS] Sixth Sitting Thursday 4 February 2016 (Morning) CONTENTS New clauses under consideration when the Committee adjourned till this day at Two o’clock. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED PBC (Bill 092) 2015 - 2016 No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Monday 8 February 2016 STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN GENERAL COMMITTEES © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2016 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 165 Public Bill Committee4 FEBRUARY 2016 Energy Bill [Lords] 166 The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chairs: †PHILIP DAVIES,MR ADRIAN BAILEY † Boswell, Philip (Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) † McCaig, Callum (Aberdeen South) (SNP) (SNP) † Maynard, Paul (Blackpool North and Cleveleys) † Cartlidge, James (South Suffolk) (Con) (Con) † Dowden, Oliver (Hertsmere) (Con) † Pennycook, Matthew (Greenwich and Woolwich) † Fernandes, Suella (Fareham) (Con) (Lab) † Hall, Luke (Thornbury and Yate) (Con) † Reynolds, Jonathan (Stalybridge and Hyde)
    [Show full text]
  • Open Research Online Oro.Open.Ac.Uk
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Application of the conditioned network concept in high frequency power line carrier Thesis How to cite: Nicholson, Peter J. (2002). Application of the conditioned network concept in high frequency power line carrier. PhD thesis The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2002 Peter J. Nicholson Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.0000fd3b Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk Application of the Conditioned Network concept in High Freqnency Power Line Carrier Peter J. Nicholson B.Eng. (Hons.) A thesis submitted to the Open University Faculty of Technology Discipline of Electronics For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy , ■ ^ r ; - bRTe "Dp 5 ' |Q 7^00 Z. bA-re OF AWARb. 17 MAX zooz. ProQuest Number: 27532770 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 27532770 Published by ProQuest LLO (2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • FDN-274688 Disclosure
    FDN-274688 Disclosure MP Total Adam Afriyie 5 Adam Holloway 4 Adrian Bailey 7 Alan Campbell 3 Alan Duncan 2 Alan Haselhurst 5 Alan Johnson 5 Alan Meale 2 Alan Whitehead 1 Alasdair McDonnell 1 Albert Owen 5 Alberto Costa 7 Alec Shelbrooke 3 Alex Chalk 6 Alex Cunningham 1 Alex Salmond 2 Alison McGovern 2 Alison Thewliss 1 Alistair Burt 6 Alistair Carmichael 1 Alok Sharma 4 Alun Cairns 3 Amanda Solloway 1 Amber Rudd 10 Andrea Jenkyns 9 Andrea Leadsom 3 Andrew Bingham 6 Andrew Bridgen 1 Andrew Griffiths 4 Andrew Gwynne 2 Andrew Jones 1 Andrew Mitchell 9 Andrew Murrison 4 Andrew Percy 4 Andrew Rosindell 4 Andrew Selous 10 Andrew Smith 5 Andrew Stephenson 4 Andrew Turner 3 Andrew Tyrie 8 Andy Burnham 1 Andy McDonald 2 Andy Slaughter 8 FDN-274688 Disclosure Angela Crawley 3 Angela Eagle 3 Angela Rayner 7 Angela Smith 3 Angela Watkinson 1 Angus MacNeil 1 Ann Clwyd 3 Ann Coffey 5 Anna Soubry 1 Anna Turley 6 Anne Main 4 Anne McLaughlin 3 Anne Milton 4 Anne-Marie Morris 1 Anne-Marie Trevelyan 3 Antoinette Sandbach 1 Barry Gardiner 9 Barry Sheerman 3 Ben Bradshaw 6 Ben Gummer 3 Ben Howlett 2 Ben Wallace 8 Bernard Jenkin 45 Bill Wiggin 4 Bob Blackman 3 Bob Stewart 4 Boris Johnson 5 Brandon Lewis 1 Brendan O'Hara 5 Bridget Phillipson 2 Byron Davies 1 Callum McCaig 6 Calum Kerr 3 Carol Monaghan 6 Caroline Ansell 4 Caroline Dinenage 4 Caroline Flint 2 Caroline Johnson 4 Caroline Lucas 7 Caroline Nokes 2 Caroline Spelman 3 Carolyn Harris 3 Cat Smith 4 Catherine McKinnell 1 FDN-274688 Disclosure Catherine West 7 Charles Walker 8 Charlie Elphicke 7 Charlotte
    [Show full text]
  • Qualifications - Advice to DFM on Higher and Advanced Higher Exams in 2021 – November 2020
    Enclosure 01 – Email: RE: Qualifications - Advice to DFM on Higher and Advanced Higher Exams in 2021 – November 2020 From: Pentland MK (Malcolm) <[email protected]> Sent: 17 November 2020 10:57 To: Director of Learning <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Qualifications - Advice to DFM on Higher and Advanced Higher Exams in 2021 - November 2020 Thanks Graeme. Just to be clear, Fiona is making time to look at the sub at 2pm. I’ve said I’ll make some further edits based on my discussions with her this morning and ask that she adds her contributions to that. I’ll send that to her before 2pm. I’ve stressed that we need to get this one up today. Malcolm From: Logan G (Graeme) <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Director of Learning Sent: 17 November 2020 10:51 To: Pentland MK (Malcolm) <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Qualifications - Advice to DFM on Higher and Advanced Higher Exams in 2021 - November 2020 Hi Malcolm Excellent submission setting out the current position and prompting DFM to consider the issues further. Please find attached a couple of tracked additions and one comment. If Fiona is providing comments at 2pm it may be better to hold the submission until then so that you can reflect SQA headline views in the sub. Thanks Graeme. From: Pentland MK (Malcolm) <[email protected]> Sent: 16 November 2020 19:20 To: Director of Learning <[email protected]>; Fiona Robertson ([email protected]) <[email protected]> Subject: Qualifications - Advice to DFM on Higher and Advanced Higher Exams in 2021 - November 2020 Hi Graeme, Fiona Given timeframes, I am sending to you simultaneously.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportfinaletcait.Pdf
    1 Autori: Jan Czarzasty (capitoli 1, 4, 9, 10, 11), Łukasz Pisarczyk (capitolo 8), Barbara Surdykowska (capitoli 2, 3, 5, 6, 7) Editore: Komisja Krajowa NSZZ „Solidarność” Wały Piastowskie 24, 80-855 Gdańsk Composizione, impaginazione: Przedsiębiorstwo Prywatne WIB Piotr Winczewski, tel. 58 341 99 89 ISBN: 978-83-85610-28-1 Pubblicazione gratuita: Pubblicazione finanziata dall’Unione europea nell’ambito del progetto n. VS/2015/0405 “Comitati Aziendali Europei come piattaforma di sostegno per gli accordi aziendali transnazionali (TCA)” La pubblicazione presenta esclusivamente le opinioni dei suoi autori e la Commissione Europea non si assume alcuna responsabilità per il suo contenuto. 2 INDICE Introduzione ..................................................................................................................... 4 Capitolo 1. Imprese multinazionali in Europa: situazione attuale, prospettive.................................................................................................. 6 Capitolo 2. Le multinazionali nel diritto internazionale............................................... 11 Capitolo 3. Comitati Aziendali Europei: regolamentazioni.......................................... 16 Capitolo 4. Comitati Aziendali Europei e relazioni industriali nazionali....................... 21 Capitolo 5. I CAE e il ruolo dei sindacati....................................................................... 25 Capitolo 6. Sviluppo dei TCA e il meccanismo del dialogo sociale europeo.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster Infrastructure Plan: Technical Assessment 2006– 2026
    Westminster Infrastructure Plan: Technical Assessment 2006– 2026 Prepared for: l Westminster City Council Prepared by: URS Corporation Limited November 2009 44935320 Westminster Infrastructure Plan: Technical Assessment 2006– 2026 November 2009 Issue No 3 44935320 Westminster Infrastructure Plan: Technical Assessment 2006– 2026 Final Report Project Title: Westminster Infrastructure Study and Plan Report Title: Westminster Infrastructure Plan: Technical Assessment 2006– 2026 Project No: 44935320 Report Ref: Status: Final Client Contact Name: Mike Fairmaner, Sara Dilmamode Client Company Name: Westminster City Council Issued By: Document Production / Approval Record Issue No: Name Signature Date Position 1 Anthony Batten Prepared 09/11/09 Project Managers by Esther Howe Elena Di Biase 09/11/09 Research Consultant Natalie Thomas 09/11/09 Research Consultant Checked and Project Director Rory Brooke 09/11/09 approved by Document Revision Record Issue No Date Details of Revisions 1 March 2009 Original issue 2 October 2009 Revised draft 3 November 2009 Final report November 2009 Westminster Infrastructure Plan: Technical Assessment 2006– 2026 Final Report November 2009 Westminster Infrastructure Plan: Technical Assessment 2006– 2026 Final Report LIMITATION URS Corporation Limited (URS) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Westminster City Council in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by us. This Report may not be relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS. Unless otherwise stated in this Report, the assessments made assume that the sites and facilities will continue to be used for their current purpose without significant change.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Background
    Appendix 2.2: Industry background Contents Page Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Evolution of major market participants ....................................................................... 1 The Six Large Energy Firms ....................................................................................... 3 Gas producers other than Centrica .......................................................................... 35 Mid-tier independent generator company profiles .................................................... 35 The mid-tier energy suppliers ................................................................................... 40 Introduction 1. This appendix contains information about the following participants in the energy market in Great Britain (GB): (a) The Six Large Energy Firms – Centrica, EDF Energy, E.ON, RWE, Scottish Power (Iberdrola), and SSE. (b) The mid-tier electricity generators – Drax, ENGIE (formerly GDF Suez), Intergen and ESB International. (c) The mid-tier energy suppliers – Co-operative (Co-op) Energy, First Utility, Ovo Energy and Utility Warehouse. Evolution of major market participants 2. Below is a chart showing the development of retail supply businesses of the Six Large Energy Firms: A2.2-1 Figure 1: Development of the UK retail supply businesses of the Six Large Energy Firms Pre-liberalisation Liberalisation 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
    [Show full text]
  • Ofgem Section 23 Determination RBA-TR-A-DET-159 (PDF)
    Determination No. RBA/TR/A/DET/159 DETERMINATION OF DISPUTES UNDER SECTION 23 OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT 1989 BETWEEN CITY OF WESTMINSTER, LONDON BOROUGH OF CAM DEN, LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON AND EDF ENERGY NETWORKS (LPN) PLC 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. On 3 December 2007, EDF Energy Networks (LPN) pic ("EDF") referred to the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority (""the Authority") a dispute with the City of Westminster ("Westminster"), and a separate dispute with the London Borough of Camden ("Camden"), for determination by the Authority under section 23 of the Electricity Act 1989 (as amended) (the "Act"). On 24 January 2008, EDF referred an additional dispute with the London Borough of Islington ("Islington") to the Authority for determination. In this document, Camden, Westminster and Islington are, where appropriate, collectively referred to as "the Councils". 1.2. The principal point for determination in these disputes is who bears responsibility in law for renewing the rising and lateral mains ("R&Ls") inside the common parts of particular mufti-occupancy apartment blocks under the freehold ownership of the Councils1, and who bears the cost of such renewal. In very broad summary, EDF maintains that the relevant Council is responsible for the R&Ls at the block under its freehold ownership and therefore it (rather than EDF) should in each case bear the costs of replacing the R&Ls. The three Councils maintain that EDF is obliged to replace the R&Ls and to bear the costs of the replacement. 1.3. The parties to the disputes have confirmed in writing that they are content for their identities to be disclosed in this document and its Appendix and the accompanying parties' Submission Documents.
    [Show full text]
  • !! Report TCA- RO FINAL Net.Pdf
    1 Echipa de autori: Jan Czarzasty (capitolele 1, 4, 9, 10, 11), Łukasz Pisarczyk (capitolul 8), Barbara Surdykowska (capitolele 2, 3, 5, 6, 7), Corectură: Diana Chelaru Editor: Comisia Naţională NSZZ „Solidarność” Wały Piastowskie 24, 80-855 Gdańsk Compoziţie, așezare în pagină: Przedsiębiorstwo Prywatne WIB Piotr Winczewski, tel. 58.341 99 89 ISBN: 978-83-85610-28-1 Publicație gratuită: Publicația finanţată de Uniunea Europeană în cadrul Proiectului nr. VS/2015/0405 „Comitetele Europene de Întreprindere ca o platformă de sprijin pentru acordurile-cadru transnaționale (ACT)” Publicaţia reflectă doar punctul de vedere al autorilor şi Comisia Europeană nu este responsabilă pentru conţinutul acesteia. 2 CUPRINS Introducere ...................................................................................................................... 4 Capitolul 1. Întreprinderile transnaţionale în Europa: situaţia actuală, perspective..................................................................... 6 Capitolul 2. Întreprinderile transnaţionale în dreptul internaţional..................... 11 Capitolul 3. Comitetele Europene de Întreprindere (CEÎ): reglementări................. 16 Capitolul 4. Comitetele Europene de Întreprindere (CEÎ) şi relaţiile industriale naţionale............................................................... 21 Capitolul 5. Comitetele Europene de Întreprindere(CEÎ) și rolul sindicatelor............ 25 Capitolul 6. Dezvoltarea ACT şi mecanismul de dialogul social european.................... 29 Capitolul 7. ACT ca instrument
    [Show full text]
  • Bankside Power Station: Planning, Politics and Pollution
    BANKSIDE POWER STATION: PLANNING, POLITICS AND POLLUTION Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Stephen Andrew Murray Centre for Urban History University of Leicester 2014 Bankside Power Station ii Bankside Power Station: Planning, Politics and Pollution Stephen Andrew Murray Abstract Electricity has been a feature of the British urban landscape since the 1890s. Yet there are few accounts of urban electricity undertakings or their generating stations. This history of Bankside power station uses government and company records to analyse the supply, development and use of electricity in the City of London, and the political, economic and social contexts in which the power station was planned, designed and operated. The close-focus adopted reveals issues that are not identified in, or are qualifying or counter-examples to, the existing macro-scale accounts of the wider electricity industry. Contrary to the perceived backwardness of the industry in the inter-war period this study demonstrates that Bankside was part of an efficient and profitable private company which was increasingly subject to bureaucratic centralised control. Significant decision-making processes are examined including post-war urban planning by local and central government and technological decision-making in the electricity industry. The study contributes to the history of technology and the environment through an analysis of the technologies that were proposed or deployed at the post-war power station, including those intended to mitigate its impact, together with an examination of their long-term effectiveness. Bankside made a valuable contribution to electricity supplies in London until the 1973 Middle East oil crisis compromised its economic viability.
    [Show full text]
  • Torts ● the Course Starts by Looking at Negligence and How It Works in Practice
    SAMPLE SYLLABUS – SUBJECT TO CHANGE LAW-UH2501L01, Tort Law NYU London Instructor Information Dr Jeremy Pilcher Lecturer in Law Director LLM QLD Programme & Deputy Director of Studies Solicitor (England & Wales) and Barrister and Solicitor (New Zealand) Course Information ● LAW-UH 2501 ● Torts ● The course starts by looking at negligence and how it works in practice. The course then goes on to examine separate torts – nuisance, occupiers’ liability, and defamation before concluding with vicarious liability and an review of the course overall. ● Tuesdays & Thursdays 10:45 a.m.-12 p.m. Course Overview and Goals The course aims to examine the effectiveness of the tort system in compensating individuals suffering personal injury, injury to reputation, psychological damage, economic loss or incursions on private property as a result of accidents, disease or intentional acts. Focusing on the tort of negligence, the course explores the social, economic and political contexts in which the rules and principles of tort are applied. Upon Completion of this Course, students will be able to: • Demonstrate understanding of the basic rules and principles relating to tort law • Demonstrate familiarity with various theories pertaining to the nature and functions of tort law • Write critically and analytically about key concepts of tort law • Display knowledge and understanding of key cases in tort law • Display knowledge and understanding of academic literature relating to tort law • Demonstrate an ability to apply the law to analyse legal problems Course Requirements SAMPLE SYLLABUS – SUBJECT TO CHANGE Page 1 SAMPLE SYLLABUS – SUBJECT TO CHANGE Class Participation • The module will be taught through lectures and are intended to provide a broad overview, or map of a subject area which will then be developed through independent study.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Hansard
    House of Commons Hansard The Government's Plan for Brexit 07 December 2016 Volume 618 Mr Speaker I inform the House that I have selected amendment (a) in the name of the Prime Minister. 12:51:00 Keir Starmer (Holborn and St Pancras) (Lab) I beg to move, That this House recognises that leaving the EU is the defining issue facing the UK; notes the resolution on parliamentary scrutiny of the UK leaving the EU agreed by the House on 12 October 2016; recognises that it is Parliament’s responsibility to properly scrutinise the Government while respecting the decision of the British people to leave the European Union; confirms that there should be no disclosure of material that could be reasonably judged to damage the UK in any negotiations to depart from the European Union after Article 50 has been triggered; and calls on the Prime Minister to commit to publishing the Government’s plan for leaving the EU before Article 50 is invoked. For months, Labour has been pressing the Prime Minister and the Government to set out their plan for Brexit. For months, the Prime Minister and a succession of Ministers have refused to do so, either in writing or from this Dispatch Box. Facing defeat on today’s motion, the Government have now caved in—last-minute amendments tell their own story and everybody knows it. This is a victory for common sense. I thank those from various Opposition parties who backed putting pressure on the Government to disclose their plan, and I thank the Conservative Members who, rightly, want to see far more detail about the approach their Front Benchers are intending to take.
    [Show full text]