DOCSLIB.ORG

Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress (name redacted) Specialist in Naval Affairs January 9, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL34476 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement Summary The Navy’s proposed FY2012 budget requested funding for the procurement of an 11th and final San Antonio (LPD-17) class amphibious ship. The ship had received $184.0 million in prior-year advance procurement (AP) funding, and the Navy’s proposed FY2012 budget requested the remaining $1,847.4 million needed to complete the ship’s estimated procurement cost of $2,031.4 million. The Navy’s FY2012 30-year shipbuilding plan calls for the procurement of a new class of amphibious ship called the LSD(X) starting in FY2017. Some observers have suggested using the LPD-17 design as the basis for the LSD(X). Navy officials do not stress this option and instead appear more interested in developing an all-new design for the LSD(X). If a decision were made to use the LPD-17 design as the basis for the LSD(X), then procuring a 12th LPD-17 in FY2014 or FY2015 would help keep the LPD-17 production line open until the procurement of the first LSD(X) in FY2017, which in turn might help reduce LSD(X) production costs. Issues for Congress in 2011 included whether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy’s proposed funding request for the 11th LPD-17, whether to encourage or direct the Navy to use the LPD-17 design as the basis for the design of the LSD(X), and—particularly if the LPD-17 design is used as the basis for the LSD(X)—whether to fund the procurement of a 12th LPD-17 in FY2014 or FY2015. Congressional Research Service Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement Contents Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1 Background...................................................................................................................................... 1 Amphibious Ships in General.................................................................................................... 1 Roles and Missions of Amphibious Ships........................................................................... 1 Amphibious Lift Goal ......................................................................................................... 2 Current and Projected Force of Amphibious Ships............................................................. 3 LPD-17 Program ....................................................................................................................... 3 Program Origin.................................................................................................................... 3 Construction Shipyards ....................................................................................................... 4 Procurement History ........................................................................................................... 4 Cost Growth, Schedule Delays, and Construction Problems .............................................. 5 Option of Using LPD-17 Design as Basis for LSD(X)....................................................... 5 FY2012 Funding Request.................................................................................................... 5 Issues for Congress.......................................................................................................................... 5 Legislative Activity For FY2012 ..................................................................................................... 7 FY2012 Funding Request..........................................................................................................7 FY2012 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 1540/P.L. 112-81) .................................... 7 House................................................................................................................................... 7 Senate (S. 1867) .................................................................................................................. 8 Senate (S. 1253) .................................................................................................................. 8 Conference .......................................................................................................................... 8 FY2012 Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Appropriations Act (H.R. 2055/P.L. 112-74).......................................................................... 8 Conference .......................................................................................................................... 8 FY2012 DOD Appropriations Act (H.R. 2219)......................................................................... 8 House................................................................................................................................... 8 Senate .................................................................................................................................. 9 Conference .......................................................................................................................... 9 Figures Figure 1. LPD-17 Class Amphibious Ship....................................................................................... 4 Tables Table 1. Projected Number of Amphibious Ships, FY2012-FY2041 .............................................. 3 Table 2. LPD-17 Procurement, FY1996-FY2012............................................................................ 5 Table A-1. Amphibious Lift Goals Since 1980.............................................................................. 10 Table A-2. MEB AE Lift Elements................................................................................................ 12 Table A-3. Ships Required for Various Potential Lift Goals.......................................................... 13 Congressional Research Service Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement Appendixes Appendix A. Additional Information on Amphibious Lift Goal.................................................... 10 Appendix B. May 25, 2011, Navy Testimony on LPD-17 Program.............................................. 15 Appendix C. LPD-17 Cost Growth and Construction Problems ................................................... 18 Contacts Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 59 Congressional Research Service Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement Introduction This report provides background information and issues for Congress on the San Antonio (LPD- 17) class amphibious ship program. The Navy’s proposed FY2012 budget requested funding for the procurement of an 11th and final San Antonio (LPD-17) class amphibious ship. Issues for Congress in 2011 included whether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy’s proposed funding request for the 11th LPD-17, whether to encourage or direct the Navy to use the LPD-17 design as the basis for the design of the LSD(X) class of amphibious ships that the Navy wants to begin procuring in FY2017, and—particularly if the LPD-17 design is used as the basis for the LSD(X)—whether to fund the procurement of a 12th LPD-17 in FY2014 or FY2015. Congress’s decisions on these issues can affect, among other things, Navy and Marine Corps funding requirements and capabilities, and the shipbuilding industrial base. Background Amphibious Ships in General1 Roles and Missions of Amphibious Ships The primary function of Navy amphibious ships is to lift (i.e., transport) U.S. Marines and their equipment and supplies to distant operating areas, and enable Marines to conduct expeditionary operations ashore in those areas. Although amphibious ships are designed to support Marine landings against opposing military forces, they are also used for operations in permissive or benign situations where there are no opposing forces. Due to their large storage spaces and their ability to use helicopters and landing craft to transfer people, equipment, and supplies from ship to shore without need for port facilities,2 amphibious ships are potentially useful for a range of 3 non-combat and combat operations. 1 Navy amphibious ships can be divided into two main groups—the so-called “big-deck” amphibious assault ships, designated LHA and LHD, which look like medium-sized aircraft carriers, and the smaller (but still sizeable) amphibious ships designated LSD or LPD, which are sometimes called “small-deck” amphibious ships. U.S. Navy amphibious ships have designations starting with the letter L, as in amphibious landing. LHA can be translated as landing ship, helicopter-capable, assault. LHD can be translated as landing ship, helicopter-capable, well deck. LSD can be translated as landing ship, well deck. LPD can be translated as landing ship, helicopter platform, well deck. Whether noted in the designation or not, all these ships have well decks. The LHAs and LHDs have large flight decks and hangar decks for embarking and operating numerous helicopters and VTOL fixed-wing aircraft, while the LSDs and LPDs have much smaller flight decks and hangar decks for embarking and operating smaller numbers of helicopters. The LHAs and LHDs, as bigger ships, in general can individually embark more Marines and equipment than the LSDs and LPDs. 2 Amphibious ships
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Winter 2019 Full Issue the .SU
    Naval War College Review Volume 72 Article 1 Number 1 Winter 2019 2019 Winter 2019 Full Issue The .SU . Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Naval War College, The .SU . (2019) "Winter 2019 Full Issue," Naval War College Review: Vol. 72 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol72/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Naval War College: Winter 2019 Full Issue Winter 2019 Volume 72, Number 1 Winter 2019 Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2019 1 Naval War College Review, Vol. 72 [2019], No. 1, Art. 1 Cover Aerial view of an international container cargo ship. In “Ships of State?,” Christopher R. O’Dea describes how China COSCO Shipping Corporation Limited has come to control a rapidly expanding network of ports and terminals, ostensibly for commercial purposes, but has thereby gained the ability to project power through the increased physical presence of its naval vessels—turning the oceans that historically have protected the United States from foreign threats into a venue in which China can challenge U.S. interests. Credit: Getty Images https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol72/iss1/1 2 Naval War College: Winter 2019 Full Issue NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW Winter 2019 Volume 72, Number 1 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE PRESS 686 Cushing Road Newport, RI 02841-1207 Published by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jersey Bounce Fall 2009
    USS New Jersey Veterans, Inc. “THE JERSEY BOUNCE” Fall 2009 Issue Email - WWW.USSNEWJERSEY.ORG LPD 21 USS NEW YORK The 22nd reunion was held at the Crowne Plaza Riverfront Hotel in Jacksonville, Florida, October 7th through October 11th, 2009. The organization enjoyed a very successful reunion. The Memorial Service, St. Augustine and Jacksonville tours, Dinner Cruise, Welcome Aboard Dinner, and a Dinner Dance Banquet were well at- tended. We want to thank the reunion committee for a job well done. The reunion committee worked hard in providing this annual opportunity for our shipmates to become reacquainted with old friends and shipmates. These reunions are a great opportunity to make new friends, or just reminisce sea stories of bygone days. The days of the battleship, the most feared dreadnaught on the high seas, are long gone, but the battleship sailors live on and on. Newer and more deadly ships are joining the fleet providing firepower that we can- not imagine only conjecture. USS New Jersey Veterans Inc Officer & Directors President / Director Vice President / Director Joe DiMaria Ernest Dalton 645 Brisa Ct. 7143 Rolling Hill Lane Chesapeake, VA 23322 San Antonio, Texas 78227 757-549-2178 210-275-7886 [email protected] [email protected] Secretary/Director Treasurer/Director Membership/Director A.J. Smith John Pete Vance Steve Sheehan 538 Kiddsville Road 1541 Hayden Rd 1209 Cumberland RD Fishersville, VA 22939 Deland, FL 32724 Abington, PA 19001 540-943-2862 386-736-3231 215-887-7583 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Master at Arms Liaison/Director Small Stores/Director Joe Porambo Mark Babcock John Pete Vance 1503 Elder Ave 5231 El Monte St.
    [Show full text]
  • Syndeck™ Ultra Lightweight Underlayment Used on the USS New York (LPD-21)
    For Release: Contact: NEWS Jill See Immediate Marketing Specialist T: 562-236-1175 F: 562-944-9958 SynDeck™ Ultra Lightweight Underlayment Used on the USS New York (LPD-21) PLACENTIA, CA (June 2009) – The military ship building/repair industry is highly focused on the efficiencies that come from ultra lightweight materials. However, most deck underlayments do not meet the lightweight requirements of the marine industry. California-based Epmar Corporation, with more than 20 years of experience providing the marine industry with primary deck coatings and underlayments, designed the SynDeck™ product line to meet the specific needs of surface materials, application and underlayment performance requirements for military and commercial marine vessels. SynDeck™ Ultra Lightweight Underlayment gives the highest possible performance with the lightest possible weight, and provides excellent corrosion resistance (MilSpec 3135). Northrop-Grumman Ship Systems, Avondale Operations, located in the greater New Orleans area, is currently building new LPD-class amphibious transport ships using Epmar’s SynDeck™ Ultra Lightweight Underlayment in all inhabited interior deck spaces. This new class of ship includes the LPD-21 USS New York, which was named to honor those that died in the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center. In fact, the bow stem of this particular ship was forged from reclaimed steel from World Trade Center buildings. When completed, the USS New York is slated to return to New York City to be commissioned into the US Navy, and will be operating out of the Norfolk Naval Shipyard. Gary Hayes, sales manager for the SynDeck™ line said, “Epmar Corporation is extremely proud to have SynDeck™ Ultra Lightweight Underlayment, SS1290, used for the deck underlayment on this class of ship, and on the USS New York in particular.” SynDeck™ is a complete line of deck underlayment products and systems used in the construction, overhaul and repair of decking and other surfaces in the marine environment.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2019 Whole No
    Dedicated to the Study of Naval and Maritime Covers Vol. 86 No. 7 July 2019 Whole No. 1028 July 2019 IN THIS ISSUE Feature Cover From the Editor’s Desk 2 Send for Your Own Covers 2 Out of the Past 3 Calendar of Events 3 Naval News 4 President’s Message 5 The Goat Locker 6 For Beginning Members 8 West Coast Navy News 9 Norfolk Navy News 10 Chapter News 11 Fleet Week New York 2019 11 USS ARKANSAS (BB 33) 12 2019-2020 Committees 13 Pictorial Cancellations 13 USS SCAMP (SS 277) 14 One Reason Why we Collect 15 Leonhard Venne provided the feature cover for this issue of the USCS Log. His cachet marks the 75th Anniversary of Author-Ship: the D-Day Operations and the cover was cancelled at LT Herman Wouk, USNR 16 Williamsburg, Virginia on 6 JUN 2019. USS NEW MEXICO (BB 40) 17 Story Behind the Cover… 18 Ships Named After USN and USMC Aviators 21 Fantail Forum –Part 8 22 The Chesapeake Raider 24 The Joy of Collecting 27 Auctions 28 Covers for Sale 30 Classified Ads 31 Secretary’s Report 32 Page 2 Universal Ship Cancellation Society Log July 2019 The Universal Ship Cancellation Society, Inc., (APS From the Editor's Desk Affiliate #98), a non-profit, tax exempt corporation, founded in 1932, promotes the study of the history of ships, their postal Midyear and operations at this end seem to markings and postal documentation of events involving the U.S. be back to normal as far as the Log is Navy and other maritime organizations of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SHIP BUILDER Vol. 56 Issue 1
    Vol. 56 Issue 1 Vol. THE SHIPBUILDER THE SHIP BUILDER Vol. 56 Issue 1 THE SHIPBUILDER ▶ Contents CONNECT WITH NASSCO 04 08 10 12 16 Messages NASSCO PDP PROFILES PERFORM CONTINUOUSLY From NEWS EVERY DAY IMPROVE The Helm BRIEFS The Shipbuilder Manager of Public and Government Relations: Dennis DuBard Senior Communications Specialist: Staci Ignell Communications Specialist: Xenon Alidag Content Layout: Jacqueline Ruiz 18 28 30 32 COVER Published by General Dynamics NASSCO Communications Department, P.O. Box 85278, San Diego, CA 92186-5278. Spring 2016. Direct comments to Dennis DuBard at [email protected] or Staci Ignell at [email protected] EMPLOYEE NASSCO In The SHIPYARD NASSCO- NASSCO SHIPBUILDERS Contributors: Nydia Ortiz-Avendano, Greyson Bailey, Hugo Bermudez, Lila Casora, Keith Cobb, Allyson Darroch, Lary Duby, Sandi Dunkel, Sherry CORNER community VISITORS NORFOLK INSTALL NON-SKID ABOARD Eberling, Larry Ehmer, Valerie Fusco, Dave Hastings, Samantha Huerta, Anthony Jemison, Beth Korkuch, Mark Lendy, Bob Liddell, Keith Londot, Megan THE USS AMERICA McLaughlin, Zach McWaters, Tony Muniz, Steve Murray, Petia Pavlova, Allison Pierson, James Pope, Lisa Root, Bryan Ruiz, John Russell, Steve Severs, Zach NEWS Sharpe, Clint Spivey, Katie Urbas, Duke Vuong, Mike Wagoner. 2 3 THE SHIPBUILDER ▶ MESSAGES FROM THE HELM Message From The PresidentFrederick J. Harris Message From The GeneralKevin manager M. Graney Our workload has largely stabilized Quality In February, the Navy’s Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral John Richardson, stopped by our following the historic delivery of In 2015, while we were working hard to deliver three lead shipyard in San Diego to learn more about our current work in both new construction and repair.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTACT: David W. Pijor Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 703-436-3802
    CONTACT: David W. Pijor Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 703-436-3802 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – February 21, 2013 First Virginia Community Bank Donates Funds for USS Arlington FAIRFAX, Va. – First Virginia Community Bank (FVCbank) has donated $10,000 in support of the USS Arlington, a ship named for the Pentagon’s home city to commemorate the September 11, 2001 attacks. The contribution will go towards the USS Arlington’s commissioning, the ceremony marking a ship’s placement in active service, which is planned for early April at Naval Station Norfolk. The donation will also help fund construction of a Tribute Room on the ship to honor the heroes of 9/11. Steel taken from the Pentagon after the attacks will be displayed aboard as a commemorative symbol. “Our involvement with the USS Arlington is a manifestation of our core belief in supporting the communities in which we do business,” said David W. Pijor, chairman and chief executive officer of the Fairfax-based bank, which opened an Arlington office in October. “The occasion allows us to recognize the deep and meaningful bonds between the military and the civilian population of the Arlington area, which are so important to us all.” FVCbank was recognized for its support at a reception on January 31 at the Army Navy Country Club in Arlington. The commissioning committee and the Navy League of Hampton Roads, a nonprofit organization that is raising funds for the ship’s enhancements, presented a plaque to Pijor, bank president Burwell Gunn, and Sid Simmons, who sits on FVCbank’s board of directors.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Commissioners of the Massachusetts Nautical School
    Public Document No. 42 THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION I ASS. III! ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS NAUTICAL SCHOOL FOR THE Year Ending November 30, 1938 Massachusetts Nautical School 100 Nashua Street, Boston Publication of this Document Approved by the Commission on Administration and Finance. 800. 2-'39. Order 6481. THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION James G. Reardon, Commissioner of Education COMMISSIONERS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS NAUTICAL SCHOOL 100 Nashua Street, Boston Clarence E. Perkins, Chairman Theodore L. Storer Walter K. Queen William H. Dimick, Secretary REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONERS To the Commissioner of Education: The Commissioners of the Massachusetts Nautical School have the honor to submit their report for the year ending November 30, 1938, the forty-seventh annual report. School Calendar, 1938 Spring entrance examinations March 31, April 1, 2 Spring graduation April 5 Winter term ended April 5 New class reported April 21 Leave, 1st Section April 6 to 20 Leave, 2nd Section April 20 to May 4 Summer term commenced May 4 "Nantucket" sailed from Boston .... May 14 "Nantucket" arrived at Boston September 20 Autumn entrance examinations .... September 22, 23, 24 Autumn graduation September 27 Summer term ended September 27 New class reported October 13 Leave, 1st Section September 30 to October 14 Leave, 2nd Section October 14 to 28 Winter term commenced October 28 Objects and Requirements of the School The Massachusetts Nautical School was established forty-seven years ago for the purpose of giving the young men of the State, who desired to enter upon a seafaring career, an opportunity to obtain in a public school a theoretical and practical knowledge of seamanship, navigation, and marine engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Queueing Theory and Architecturally-Oriented Early Stage Ship Design to the Concept of a Vessel Deploying a Fleet of Un
    Applying Queueing Theory and Architecturally-Oriented Early Stage Ship Design to the Concept of a Vessel Deploying a Fleet of Uninhabited Vehicles by Nikolaos Kouriampalis A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering) Department of Mechanical Engineering University College London 2019 1 "Ἐὰν ταῖς γλώσσαις τῶν ἀνθρώπων λαλῶ καὶ τῶν ἀγγέλων, ἀγάπην δὲ μὴ ἔχω, γέγονα χαλκὸς ἠχῶν ἢ κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον" Προς Κορινθίους Α' 13 επιστολή Παύλου "If I speak in the tongues of men or of angels, but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal" 1 Corinthians 13:1 Paul’s Epistle 2 Declaration I, Nikolaos Kouriampalis, declare that except where explicit reference is made to other sources, this thesis is the result of my own work. I confirm that this thesis has not been submitted for any other degree at University College London or any other institution. Print Name: Signature: 3 Abstract Uninhabited vehicles technology is becoming important in naval warfare, providing an entirely new capability. By projecting power through the deployment of such vehicles, the exposure of humans to military threats is reduced. Although the Royal Navy is pursuing the employment of uninhabited vehicles for a variety of applications, the concept of a substantial fleet of such vehicles, operated from a mothership, able to host and support their operations during a mission scenario, is still a novel design challenge. In the initial design stages, when little of design effort has been committed, ship design details will be far from fully defined and are still amenable to change without significant implications on the programme budget, or schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime and Transportation Resource Manual and Career Guide
    Maritime and Transportation Resource Manual and Career Guide Ship Maintenance & Modernization Vessel Operations Port Operations & Marine Logistics Emerging Technologies About the SMART Center The Southeast Maritime and Transportation (SMART) Center is one of 42 National Science Foundation academicSapiet a Scredentialsinciet aS asperci well as industry-valued certifications and credentials. The pathway has proven to Advanced Technology Education (NSF ATE) Centers in the United States and the only ATE center solely increaseperci atectem enrollments oluptaspedi and nis ipid completions eumquatur autafor targeted nossimollaut populations et eosapicitium including quasperae first-generation num ut omnis ut collegemosantur stu- max- imen ectotatiasit aut ant et liqui nossit quatus rempore nimaionseque omniend itatur? Litas rem ut re rae modit ped que focused on increasing the number of middle-skill technicians in the maritime and transportation industry. dents, minorities, women, and veterans and is being scaled nationwide through the center’s renewal. volenimil excestium arcit, alicide velentio quid exera con exerum qui nitis ea cum eariasi ulparum re pa velique sunt ene officim The NSF ATE program endeavors to strengthen the skills of technicians, whose work is vitally important Theagnimaiorepe SMART Centermodiatur, and comnis its Executive dus as dolorrum Director ut et andfacersperum PI Barbara quo est,Murray seque has etureptae been recognizedveligene non pedby leadersmagname at eari- the to the nation’s prosperity and security. In ATE centers and projects, community colleges have a leadership tium qui consequatios magnit rendaepro moluptam, venimil iducienti omnim et liatia nulpa coreperione dolor reperi bea sunt national, regional and state level for: role and work with universities, secondary schools, businesses and industry, and government agencies to incilic iduntibus am ut odis nectem lab inis dolo mi, abor reped quias miliqui ut accaborit endit, suntur maximporita volorer design and carry out model workforce development initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California
    University of California Report on Audit of Financial Statements and on Federal Awards Programs in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133 For the Year Ended June 30, 2009 Location EIN Office of the President 94-3067788 Berkeley 94-6002123 Davis 94-6036494 Irvine 95-2226406 Los Angeles 95-6006143 Merced 27-0093858 Riverside 95-6006142 San Diego 95-6006144 San Francisco 94-6036493 Santa Barbara 95-6006145 Santa Cruz 94-1539563 University of California Table of Contents June 30, 2009 Page Report of Independent Auditors ................................................................................................................ 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis ................................................................................................... 3 Audited Financial Statements University of California: Statements of Net Assets at June 30, 2009 and 2008 ................................................................... 45 Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets for the Years Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 ............................................................................ 46 Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 ..................................... 47 University of California Retirement System and Retiree Health Benefit Trust: Statements of Plans’ and Trust’s Fiduciary Net Assets at June 30, 2009 and 2008 ...................... 49 Statements of Changes in Plans’ and Trust’s Fiduciary Net Assets For the Years Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Act Ends Controversial Personnel System NYC Guests Visit PCU New
    ® Serving the Hampton Roads Navy Family Vol. 17, No. 44, Norfolk, VA FLAGSHIPNEWS.COM November 5, 2009 More than 97 percent selected from Continuation Board President BY MCC (SW) MARIA YAGER Chief of Naval Personnel Public Affairs proclaims MILLINGTON, Tenn. — More than 97 percent of candidates reviewed by the Navy’s military Senior Enlisted Continuation Board were se- lected to continue naval service according to a Navy message released Oct. 30. family “The overwhelming continuance of our se- nior enlisted demonstrates the extraordinary month quality of the chief petty offi cer mess. The re- cords of eligible master chiefs, senior chiefs PRESS RELEASE and chiefs were reviewed and given full con- American Forces Press Service sideration,” said Vice Adm. Mark Ferguson, chief of naval personnel. WASHINGTON — President After complete review of 5,686 eligible ac- Barack Obama pledged his sup- tive duty and full-time-support candidates, the port of military members and board selected 5,528 members for continua- Photo by MC1 Jennifer A. Villalovos their families and said Ameri- tion. Senior Chief Mass Communication Specialist Bill Houlihan interviews Master Chief Petty Offi cer cans have a “solemn obligation” of the Navy (MCPON) Rick West and Navy Total Force Fleet Master Chief Scott Benning for a According to the precept, which outlines Continuations Boards podcast. to preserve their well-being in his what information board members may or may proclamation declaring Novem- not consider from a record, documented mis- “There were chiefs with adverse informa- notifi ed prior to the results posting in BUPERS ber as Military Family Month.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress Updated December 17, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS22373 Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations Summary In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, as well as the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden. During these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established “a community of interest” (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010. The Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Navy operated the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS), which were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S.
    [Show full text]