Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Romania Lavinia Stan Frontmatter More Information
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cazul Gheorghe Ursu. Poziția Ministerului Public Și Martori
Cazul Gheorghe Ursu. Poziția Ministerului Public și martori Dosar nr.2500/2/2017; 1030/2017 Curtea de Apel Bucureşti - Secţia I Penală Încheiere Şedinţa publică din data de 18 septembrie 2019 Președinta Curții: Mihaela Niţă EXTRAS Poziția Ministerului Public - Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Bucureşti și martori Reprezentantul Ministerului Public arată că dispoziţiile art.358 din Codul penal din anul 1968, în vigoarea la data săvârşirii faptei, incriminează infracţiunea de tratamente neomenoase. Apreciază că în sarcina inculpaţilor se impune reţinerea alin.1, care prevede că supunerea la tratamente neomenoase, în general a oricărei alte persoane căzute sub puterea adversarului, se pedepseşte, precum şi forma agravată prevăzută la alin.3 teza I, conform căreia torturarea celor prevăzuţi în alin.1 se pedepseşte. Arată că această infracţiune se pedepseşte în noul Cod penal de dispoziţiile art.439, care reglementează infracţiuni contra umanităţii, activitatea infracţională desfăşurată de inculpaţi încadrându-se în variantele normative prevăzute de art.439 lit.e, g şi k din Codul penal. Astfel cum se menţionează în tezele prealabile ale proiectului Codului penal, aprobate prin Hotărârea de Guvern nr.1183/24.09.2008, publicată în Monitorul Oficial nr.686/08.10.2008, textul reia într-o formă adaptată prevederile art.7 din Statutul Curţii Penale Internaţionale, valorificând definiţiile anterioare promovate de art.6 lit. c din Statul Tribunalului Militar Internaţional de la Nürnberg, art. 2 nr.1 lit.c a Legii nr.10 a Consiliului de Control, art.5 lit. c din Statutul Tribunalului Penal Internaţional pentru Orientul Îndepărtat, respectiv art.5 din Statutul Tribunalului Penal Internaţional pentru fosta Iugoslavie şi art.3 din Statutul Tribunalului Penal Internaţional pentru Rwanda. -
Article Intelligence Sector Reforms in Romania: a Scorecard
Intelligence Sector Reforms in Romania: A Article Scorecard Lavinia Stan Marian Zulean St. Francis Xavier University, Canada University of Bucharest, Romania [email protected] Abstract Since 1989, reforms have sought to align the Romanian post-communist intelligence community with its counterparts in established democracies. Enacted reluctantly and belatedly at the pressure of civil society actors eager to curb the mass surveillance of communist times and international partners wishing to rein in Romania’s foreign espionage and cut its ties to intelligence services of non-NATO countries, these reforms have revamped legislation on state security, retrained secret agents, and allowed for participation in NATO operations, but paid less attention to oversight and respect for human rights. Drawing on democratization, transitional justice, and security studies, this article evaluates the capacity of the Romanian post-communist intelligence reforms to break with communist security practices of unchecked surveillance and repression and to adopt democratic values of oversight and respect for human rights. We discuss the presence of communist traits after 1989 (seen as continuity) and their absence (seen as discontinuity) by offering a wealth of examples. The article is the first to evaluate security reforms in post- communist Romania in terms of their capacity to not only overhaul the personnel and operations inherited from the Securitate and strengthen oversight by elected officials, but also make intelligence services respectful of basic human rights. Introduction Since transitioning away from communist dictatorship in 1989, Romania has become a liberal democracy and a member of the European Union (EU) and NATO. As elsewhere in Central and Eastern Europe where the communist secret police had conducted repression, in Romania the backbone of democratization was represented by reforms of the intelligence community, understood to comprise all of the intelligence services operating in the country. -
Religion and Politics in Post-Communist Romania RELIGION and GLOBAL POLITICS SERIES
Religion and Politics in Post-Communist Romania RELIGION AND GLOBAL POLITICS SERIES Series Editor John L. Esposito University Professor and Director Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding Georgetown University Islamic Leviathan Islam and the Making of State Power Seyyed Vali Reza Nasr Rachid Ghannouchi A Democrat within Islamism Azzam S. Tamimi Balkan Idols Religion and Nationalism in Yugoslav States Vjekoslav Perica Islamic Political Identity in Turkey M. Hakan Yavuz Religion and Politics in Post-Communist Romania lavinia stan lucian turcescu 1 2007 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright # 2007 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Stan, Lavinia. Religion and politics in post-communist Romania / Lavinia Stan, Lucian Turcescu. p. cm.—(Religion and global politics series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-530853-2 1. -
Étude Sur La Problématique De L'identité Dans La Période
Document généré le 30 sept. 2021 17:09 Ethnologies Les défis de l’identité Étude sur la problématique de l’identité dans la période post-communiste en Roumanie Gabriela Blebea Nicolae Négocier la transcendance / Negotiating Transcendence Résumé de l'article Volume 25, numéro 1, 2003 Le passé d’une personne est-il révélateur ? Les valeurs morales sont-elles indifférentes à l’identité personnelle ? Une personne peut-elle changer URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/007132ar radicalement si les circonstances changent ? Ce sont quelques-unes des DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/007132ar questions générales qui entourent l’interrogation spécifique aux pays postcommunistes, celle de la possibilité ou non d’ignorer le fait qu’un politicien Aller au sommaire du numéro qui déclare aujourd’hui « ses convictions démocratiques » a collaboré avec la police politique. Cette question, posée à travers la problématique de l’identité personnelle, porte sur une réalité difficile à imaginer pour un citoyen d’une société démocratique qui n’a connu ni la torture, ni l’intimidation provoquées Éditeur(s) par la police politique sous le communisme, du temps où il existait un délateur Association Canadienne d'Ethnologie et de Folklore pour vingt personnes. Cet article examine les possibles conséquences que pourrait avoir l’ouverture des archives de la police politique sur l’identité de ceux qui ont été « l’objet de la surveillance » et sur celle des anciens délateurs. ISSN En tenant compte du fait que l’identité personnelle se définit en termes de 1481-5974 (imprimé) continuité et d’une certaine unité, cet article analyse deux cas « exemplaires », 1708-0401 (numérique) même s’ils sont des cas limite : le premier porte sur la récupération de l’identité personnelle par l’aveu et le deuxième sur l’héroïsme de préserver la Découvrir la revue cohérence identitaire dans les cas exceptionnels. -
Romania Page 1 of 17
Romania Page 1 of 17 Romania Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor February 25, 2004 Romania is a constitutional democracy with a multiparty, bicameral parliamentary system. Prime Minister Adrian Nastase is the head of government, and President Ion Iliescu is the head of state. Nastase's Social Democratic Party (PSD) and Iliescu won elections in 2000 that were judged to be generally free and fair. The Constitution provides for an independent judiciary; however, in practice the judiciary remained subject to political influence. Widespread corruption remained a problem, although initial but only partial steps were taken to address the problem. The National Police are primarily responsible for law enforcement, the gendarmerie for preserving public order, and the Border Police for maintaining border security. The Ministry of Administration and Interior supervises these organizations. The military has primary responsibility for protection against external threats. An internal intelligence service assesses threats to national security, but has no law enforcement powers. Civilian authorities maintained effective control of security and intelligence organizations, although some concerns were expressed regarding the possible misuse of intelligence agencies for political purposes. Some members of security forces committed serious human rights abuses. The country was a middle-income developing country in transition from a centrally-planned to a market economy. Its population was approximately 21.7 million. Economic activity was primarily in the manufacturing, agriculture, and energy sectors. During the year, economic growth was estimated at 4.8 percent and inflation at 14.1 percent. The Government generally respected the human rights of its citizens; however, there were problems in some areas. -
International Conference Crimes of the Communist Regimes, Prague, 24–25 February 2010
International conference Crimes of the Communist Regimes an assessment by historians and legal experts proceedings Th e conference took place at the Main Hall of the Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic (24–25 February 2010), and at the Offi ce of the Government of the Czech Republic (26 February 2010) Th e publication of this book was kindly supported by the European Commission Representation in the Czech Republic. Th e European Commission Representation in the Czech Republic bears no responsibility for the content of the publication. © Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes, 2011 ISBN 978-80-87211-51-9 Th e conference was hosted by Jiří Liška, Vice-chairman of the Senate, Parliament of the Czech Republic and the Offi ce of the Government of the Czech Republic and organized by the Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes together with partner institutions from the working group on the Platform of European Memory and Conscience under the kind patronage of Jan Fischer Prime minister of the Czech Republic Miroslava Němcová First deputy chairwoman of the Chamber of Deputies, Parliament of the Czech Republic Heidi Hautala (Finland) Chairwoman of the Human Rights Subcommittee of the European Parliament Göran Lindblad (Sweden) President of the Political Aff airs Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and chairman of the Swedish delegation to PACE Sandra Kalniete (Latvia) former dissident, Member of the European Parliament Tunne Kelam (Estonia) former dissident, Member of the European Parliament -
Lavinia Stan
Lavinia Stan Departmental Address: Department of Political Science Phone: (902) 867-5084 St. Francis Xavier University Fax: (902) 867-3243 Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada Email: [email protected] ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lavinia_Stan Web of Science/Publons ResearcherID: A-1337-2008 Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=OZN8mWAAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao ORCID Identifier: https://orcid.org/00 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY Program Coordinator, Public Policy and Governance (PGOV), Brian Mulroney Institute of Government, St. Francis Xavier University, 2019-2020. Jules Leger Research Chair, St. Francis Xavier University, July 2018 – June 2020 Professor, Department of Political Science, St. Francis Xavier University, 2017 - present Chair, Department of Political Science, St. Francis Xavier University, May 2015 - May 2017 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, St. Francis Xavier University, 2009 - 2017 Member, Centre canadien d'études allemandes et européennes, Universite de Montreal, 2014 - present Visiting Professor, Centre canadien d'études allemandes et européennes, Université de Montréal, 2013-14 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, StFX, January 2004-2009 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Concordia University, 2006-2008 Killam Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Political Science, Dalhousie University, 2001-2003 EDUCATION Ph. D., Political Science, University of Toronto, 2001 M.A., Political Science, University of Toronto, 1996 B.Com. (Honors Thesis), Academy of Economic -
Dan Perjovschi
kaufmann repetto DAN PERJOVSCHI Born in 1961, Sibiu (RO). Lives and works in Bucharest. Illustrator, 22 Magazine Bucharest. Contributing editor Idea-Art and Society Cluj. Prizes 2016 Rosa Schapire Art Prize, Hamburger Kunsthalle, Hamburg 2012 Princess Margriett Award 2006 Vincent Prize shortlist, Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam 2004 George Maciunas Prize 2002 Henkel CEE Prize for Contemporary Drawing, Wien 1999 ‘Gheorghe Ursu’ Human Rights Foundation Award, Bucharest Public collections Ludwig Museum, Budapest, Hungary Museum of Modern Art, New York City, USA Fonds Municipal d’art contemporain de Paris, Paris, France Artium, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain Nomas Foundation, Roma, Italy Centre Pompidou – Musée national d’art moderne, Paris, France Centre national des arts plastiques, Paris, France LiMAC Museo de Arte Contemporaneo de Lima, Lima, Perú Tate Collection, London, United Kingdom Nasher Museum of Art at Duke University, Durham, NC, USA The Modern Museum in Sweden – Moderna Museet, Stockholm, Sweden FRAC Rhône-Alpes, Villerubanne, France Art Collection Telekom, Germany Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, USA Selected solo exhibitions 2017 Magnet Me, Sandwich Art Space, Bucharest, Romania 2016 The Hard Drawing, HMKV, Dortmund Rosa Schapire Art Prize, Hamburger Kunsthalle, Hamburg Dan Perjovschi, Art Gallery Kula, Split The Dakar Drawing, Raw Material Company, Zone B, Dakar, Senegal Meanwhile what about socialism?, NewBridge Project Space, Newcastle, UK 2015 Faces-faces, Karte Gallery Targu Mures Romania Pression Liberté Expression, -
The Haunting Past
The Haunting Past The Afterlife of the Communist Secret Services The Haunting Past The Afterlife of the Communist Secret Services International Conferences in the Hamvas Institute Hamvas Institute, 2010 Contents Ágnes Hankiss Introductory Thoughts 7 László Kövér Opening Speech 18 Amy Knight The Legacy of Secret Police in Post-Communist States 24 Jörn Mothes The Political Injustices Committed in the German Democratic Republic (GDR) 34 Wojciech Roszkowszki The Oleksy Case and the Role of Secret Services in Polish Politics 45 Vitalij Sentalinszkij Crime Without Punishment, Russia in the 20th Century 53 Sándor Őze State Security Control in Hungarian Historiography from 1956 to the Change of Regime 61 Alex Standish Russian Intelligence Strategy Towards Post-Communist Europe Under Vladimir Putin: Partners or Predators? 83 Marius Oprea The Fifth Power: Transition of the Romanian Securitate from Communism to NATO 102 Piotr Naimski Poland Fifteen Years After the Round Table: Where is the End of the Transition? 121 György Schöpflin The Right and Post-Communism 135 Notes 146 Biographies 153 Ágnes Hankiss Introductory Thoughts Culture, if the term is not restricted unnecessarily to matters of intellec- tual education or arts, is actually nothing else but the embodiment of the zeitgeist that permeates, and even creates, either furtively or stentoriously people’s actual character, behaviour, attitude, daily life and the complete social institutional system they are part of. Regime change of 1989 is change of culture. Have we succeeded in ful- filling it? Have we done it in depth or just superficially? It seems to be a fair question as changes in spirit and mind are significantly slower than transfor- mations of the economy or of institutional, legal systems. -
2016-2017 Research & Scholarship Report
2016-2017 RESEARCH & SCHOLARSHIP REPORT StFX l 2016-2017 Research and Scholarship Report 3 About the University 1 Message From The Academic Vice-President & Provost and the Associate Vice-President, Research & Graduate Studies 2 Researcher Profiles 3 FACULTY OF ARTS Anthropology 9 Economics 11 English 13 History 14 Modern Languages (French, German, Spanish) 15 Philosophy 15 Political Science 19 Psychology 22 Religious Studies 27 Sociology 27 FACULTY OF BUSINESS Accounting and Finance 28 Management 29 Marketing and Enterprise Systems 29 FACULTY OF EDUCATION Adult Education 30 Education 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS FACULTY OF SCIENCE Biology 35 Chemistry 39 Earth Sciences 41 Human Kinetics 51 Human Nutrition 55 Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science 56 Nursing 57 Physics 61 OTHER ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Climate & Environment Program 63 Development Studies 63 Public Policy & Governance Program 64 Women’s and Gender Studies 66 Coady International Institute 67 Extension Department 68 National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health 69 ACADEMIC ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS Vice-President’s Office 69 Research Services Group 70 StFX RESEARCH STATISTICS 72 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 75 StFX l 2016-2017 Research and Scholarship Report 5 ABOUT THE UNIVERSITY Founded in 1853, St. Francis Xavier University (StFX) in Antigonish, Nova Scotia, began as a small school of higher studies established by the Catholic Church. Today, StFX is widely recognized as one of Canada’s leading undergraduate universities with a longstanding tradition of academic excellence, innovation in teaching, research and service to society. It brings together over 4,500 students for studies in arts, sciences, business, education and applied professional programs. The University is known for its strong traditions of social engagement and service to humanity, as well as for the numerous communities with which it engages. -
De Ce a Fost Torturat Gheorghe Ursu De Securitate
De ce a fost torturat Gheorghe Ursu de Securitate Instanta de fond a retinut ca anchetarea lui Gheorghe Ursu a inceput in momentul cand i-au fost gasite “inscrisuri au caracter profund dusmanos” la adresa “conducerii de Partid si de Stat”. De asemenea, instanta arata ca in raportul DSS din 30.01.1989 “s-a apreciat că victima Ursu Gheorghe Emil a desfășurat o intensă activitate de propagandă dușmănoasă prin acțiuni directe, prin intermediul unor oficine de propagandă reacționară din străinătate […] precizându-se că impotriva acestuia urmeaza a se începe urmărirea penală, continuarea cercetărilor sub stare de arest și trimiterea sa în judecată pentru săvârșirea infracțiunilor prevăzute de art.166 alin. 2 Cod Penal și art. 37 alin. 1 și 3 din Decretul nr. 210/1960, precum și clarificarea relațiilor pe care victima le avea cu unii scriitori care se aflau în intenția organelor de securitate pentru conceptiile dușmănoase”. In continuare, instanta consemneaza nota sefului Securitatii interne, Generalul Iulian Vlad, care i- a cerut sefului inculpatilor, colonelul Vasile Gheorghe (seful Directiei a VI-a Cercetari Penale a Securitatii), sa afle “unde și în ce mod au proliferat acțiunile celui în cauză”, sa aprofundeze “legăturile în lumea scriitorilor” si sa afle “despre ce este vorba mai în concret”. Mentioneaza si nota din actul de desfacere contractului de muncă al lui Gheorghe Ursu din 04.10.1985 (in timp ce era arestat si torturat de inculpati) conform careia victima “a dus o activitate de defăimare a orânduirii socialiste la locul de muncă, a întreținut relații clandestine cu posturi de radio străine care prin activitatea lor duc o propagandă împotriva țării”. -
2015 Conference Program
2015 International Conference Linking Past, Present and Future: The 25th Anniversary of Regime Change in Romania and Moldova (1989/1991) PROGRAM 17-19 iunie / 17-19 June 2015 Faculty of Political Science, University of Bucharest Co-organizers: The Society for Romanian Studies is an international interdisciplinary academic organization based in the United States of America and dedicated to promoting the professional study, criticism, and research of all aspects of Romanian culture and civilization, particularly concerning the countries of Romania and Moldova. Established in 1973 by a group of enthusiasts, the Society has become the premier Romanian Studies organization in the world, gathering scholars, students and government officials from a variety of countries. SRS Board: Lavinia Stan (President) James Koranyi (President Elect) Irina Livezeanu (Past President) Paul Michelson (Secretary) William Crowther (Treasurer) Roland Clark (Newsletter Editor) Emilian Ghelase (Webmaster) Margaret Beissinger (contact person with the Romanian Studies Association of America) Jennifer Cash Monica Ciobanu Jill Massino Bruce O’Neill Paul E. Sum Andrei Terian Roxana Cazan (student representative) Jonathan Stillo (student representative) Information on the Society is listed on its website, http://www.society4romanianstudies.org. The Society runs a number of programs and activities relevant for scholars, students, and governmental officials. Every year, it offers a prize for the best graduate student essay written in English on a Romanian Studies topic. The Society also awards a biennial prize for the best monograph published in English on a Romanian Studies theme, with an internationally recognized press. In partnership with Polirom, the Society also publishes a book collection. Its annual general meeting takes place every year in November in conjunction with the conference of the Association for Slavic, East European & Eurasian Studies (ASEEES).