Fossils and Decapod Phylogeny

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fossils and Decapod Phylogeny Contributions to Zoology, 72 (2-3) 169-172 (2003) SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague Fossils and decapod phylogeny Frederick+R. Schram & Christopher Dixon Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University ofAmsterdam, Mauritskade 57, NL-1092 AD Amsterdam, the Netherlands Keywords:: Decapoda, phylogeny, cladistics Abstract closely related as Meiura. The analysis of Scholtz & Richter was based on the manual Method of for An expanded series ofmorphological characters developed Hennig, but Schram (2000, 2001) undertook a com- a cladistic analysis ofextant decapods has yielded a new hypo- puter-based cladistic study, which essentially con- for the ofthe this data- thesis phylogeny group. Application of firmed their results. selected fossil base to genera produces some interesting results Nevertheless, some differences occurred in and and demonstrates the feasibility of treating fossils as full in of Schram’s tree. Enoplometopus emerged separate equal partners the study decapod phylogeneticrelationships. In addition, it seems clear that rigorous cladistic methods can from the other clawed lobsters; Astacida was sepa- be used evaluate the of rather to phylogenetic positions fossils, rate from all the other fractostemalians; and Neogly- than ad hoc speculation. phea (the only living memberof the Glypheoidea), although previously classified with the achelates, emerged within the higher fractosterns. The con- Introduction sensus values within the paraphyletic “lobsteroids”, however, remained low. Our understanding of the phylogeny of the deca- A more comprehensive examination of decapod is in pod crustaceans a true work progress. Although morphology was undertaken with additional taxa the Bur- matter was thought settled for many years, and characters by Dixon et al. (in press) and a new kenroad (1963, 1981) reopened debate on the arrangement of higher taxa arose (Fig. 1). The frac- subject. Some consensus about the relationships tostern clade disappeared and the characteristic the lower around amongst decapods quickly emerged ofthat features group were suggested to be a mani- a paraphyletic of natantians, but most arrangement festation of burrowing life styles. In its place, the efforts were based on morphology Schram, (see old Astacidea (now including the glypheoids, and 2001, for a However, Scholtz & Rich- summary). subsuming Enoplometopus back into Homarida) re- ter (1995) undertooka new analysis based on exami- emerged alongside a new clade, the Sterropoda. nationof that focused on the morphology Reptantia Within the latter group, the Thalassinida occur along and a new scheme for these proposed phylogenetic with the Eurusternalia, a new grouping of achelates forms. They found polychelids to be a sister The group with meiurans. branching arrangements of this to Eureptantia, within which the achelate forms were remain stable under various alterna- new tree very a sister clade the Macrochelata. Within the lat- to tive options, and moreover present another posi- ter, the old Astacidea was broken up to separate tive result. The trees of Scholtz & Richter (1995) the clawed lobsters from the Fracto- a new group, and Schram (2001) are unbalanced, presenting es- sternalia. While there was uncertainty concerning sentially a phylogenetic comb of sequentially ar- the relationship of the fractostern crayfish and the ranged clades. The Dixon et al. tree is much more thalassinideans, the Anomala and Brachyura were balanced, at least with regard to the Reptantia. Downloaded from Brill.com10/01/2021 08:19:56AM via free access 170 F.R. Schram & C. Dixon - Fossils and decapod phylogeny Fig. L Simplified cladogram from Dixon et al. (in press) ofmajor relationships within Decapoda. The Dixon al. undertaken for two examined a selected of et project was we array well-preserved reasons. First, we wished to establish a morpho- replant forms from the fossil collections of the logical baseline for decapod phylogeny that could Teylers Museum (Haarlem). These included the be further and tested with both the of Jurassic Solnhofen explored use genera Eryma, Eryon, Glyphea, molecular and additional and which also added sequence data, expansion Mecochirus, to we scoring of the taxon sample. That project continues in col- for the earliest decapod fossil, the Devonian lob- laboration with our colleague Dr Shane Ahyong. ster Palaeopalaemon newberryi (cf. Schram et ah, added Second, we wanted to provide a starting point upon 1978). Taxa were individually and as a whole which the of extinct fossil the matrix to their individual and phylogenetic position to assess group be the forms could assessed. This paper is a progress effect on resulting tree. report of that second project. The results (Fig. 2) confirm the tree ofDixon et al. (in press). Furthermore, the lack of information about some features in the fossils at hand did not result in of of The analysis collapse any many branching points the master analysis. The two fossil glypheoid gen- studied with The data set of Dixon et al. contains 70 characters, era we grouped the extant Neoglyphea form Asta- of which 52 are multistate. Of these, 60 characters and these together a sister group to the cidea. is within the clawed were retained for this study based on the likeli- Eryma placed lobsters could the sister taxon to and hood that they be found on well-preserved as Enoplometopus. Eryon fossils. Interestingly, the reduced database repli- the polychelids do not form a monophyletic group cated the but basal tree obtained from the full database, con- as previously thought, Eryon is instead the the The result firming stability of the new tree. In addition, to Eureptantia. most surprising Downloaded from Brill.com10/01/2021 08:19:56AM via free access Contributions to Zoology, 72 (2-3) - 2003 171 2. fossil and extant Pig. Cladogram of relationships among genera of replant decapods Was the placement of Palaeopalaemon, the earliest assessments ofphylogenetic relationships and Jenner known the unresolved Inclusion of fossils is thus decapod, high in tree at an (2002). a necessary com- with the Thalassinida and the of studies. Polytomy Euruster- ponent any phylogenetic Nevertheless, nalia. fossils afford distinct problems mainly related to It seems clear from these preliminary results that missing data (Schram, 1991; Schram& Hof, 1998). the evaluation of fossils directly in connection with Generally, one cannot overload an analysis with modern taxa to obtain a more comprehensive as- fossils without destabilizing the branching array of sessment of decapod phylogeny is feasible. a tree. The missing data tends to inject too much Any phylogenetic tree is only as good as the data uncertainty into the processing of data by the cur- that are included in the analysis. The resultant pat- rent algorithms. Thus it is encouraging to have a tern a of characters that character for that applies only to specific set set decapod crustaceans can pro- have been scored for a of taxa. Jenner duce stable and reasonable specific array trees provide assess- & Schram (1999) demonstrated the need for the ments concerning the phylogenetic affinities of ni °st comprehensive analyses possible in regard to fossilized forms. both character and taxon sets to obtain accurate The results obtained here for a selected set of Downloaded from Brill.com10/01/2021 08:19:56AM via free access 172 F.R. Schram & C. Dixon - Fossils and decapod phylogeny Jenncr R. 2002. Boolean and character taxa must be built upon. While it is reassuring to logic state identity: pitfalls ofcharacter coding in metazoan cladistics. Contrib. see that fossil decapod taxa are appearing in rea- Zool. 71: 67-91. sonable places on the tree, we nonetheless cannot Jenner Schram FR. 1999. The of R, grand game metazoan be complacent about past assumptions concerning phylogeny: rules and strategies. Biol. Rev. Cambr. Phil. the relationships among fossil and living decapods. Soc. 74: 121-142. Scholtz G, Richter S. 1995. Phylogenetic systematics ofthe reptantian Decapoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca). Zool. Jour. Linn. Soc. 113: 289-328. Acknowledgements Schram FR. 1991. Cladistic analysis of metazoan phyla and the of 35-46. In: Si- placement fossil problematica, pp. We wish to special thanks to Dr Shane Ahyong for his express monetta A, Conway Morris S (eds). The Early Evolution into our database of characters. Pro- continuing input evolving of Metazoa and the Significance of Problematic Taxa fessors Gerhard Scholtz and Rod Feldmann, and Dr Stefan Richter Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. have provided valuable insights and to further the of suggestions Schram FR. 2000. Phylogeny decapods. Studi e Ricerche, project along. Assoc. Amici Mus. civ. ‘G. ZannatoMontecchio Maggiore: 61. Schram FR. 2001. Phylogeny of decapods: moving towards a consensus. Hydrobiologia 449: 1-20. References Schram FR, Feldniann RM, Copeland MJ. 1978. The late Devonian Palaeopalaemonidae and the earliest decapod Burkenroad MD. 1963. The Evolution of the Eucarida crustaceans. Jour. Paleo. 52: 1375-1387. (Crustacea, Eumalacostraca), in Relation to the Fossil Schram FR, Hof CHJ. 1998. Fossil taxa and the relation- Record. Tulane Stud. Geol. 2: 1-17. of 273-302. ships major crustacean groups, pp. In: Edge- Riirkcnroad Ml). 1981. The Higher Taxonomy and Evolu- combe G (ed.). Arthropod Fossils and Phylogeny. New tion of Decapoda (Crustacea). Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. York: Columbia University Press. Hist. 19: 251-268. Dixon CJ, Ahyong ST, Schrani FR. in press. A new hy- Received 31 March 2003 pothesis of decapodphylogeny (Crustacea: Malacostraca). Crustaceana Downloaded from Brill.com10/01/2021 08:19:56AM via free access.
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Evidence That Both Ancient Vicariance and Dispersal Have Contributed to the Biogeographic Patterns of Anchialine Ca
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Phylogenetic evidence that both ancient vicariance and dispersal have contributed to Received: 6 December 2016 Accepted: 25 April 2017 the biogeographic patterns of Published: xx xx xxxx anchialine cave shrimps José A. Jurado-Rivera1, Joan Pons2, Fernando Alvarez3, Alejandro Botello4, William F. Humphreys5,6, Timothy J. Page 7,8, Thomas M. Iliffe9, Endre Willassen10, Kenneth Meland11, Carlos Juan1,2 & Damià Jaume2 Cave shrimps from the genera Typhlatya, Stygiocaris and Typhlopatsa (Atyidae) are restricted to specialised coastal subterranean habitats or nearby freshwaters and have a highly disconnected distribution (Eastern Pacific, Caribbean, Atlantic, Mediterranean, Madagascar, Australia). The combination of a wide distribution and a limited dispersal potential suggests a large-scale process has generated this geographic pattern. Tectonic plates that fragment ancestral ranges (vicariance) has often been assumed to cause this process, with the biota as passive passengers on continental blocks. The ancestors of these cave shrimps are believed to have inhabited the ancient Tethys Sea, with three particular geological events hypothesised to have led to their isolation and divergence; (1) the opening of the Atlantic Ocean, (2) the breakup of Gondwana, and (3) the closure of the Tethys Seaway. We test the relative contribution of vicariance and dispersal in the evolutionary history of this group using mitochondrial genomes to reconstruct phylogenetic and biogeographic scenarios with fossil- based calibrations. Given that the Australia/Madagascar shrimp divergence postdates the Gondwanan breakup, our results suggest both vicariance (the Atlantic opening) and dispersal. The Tethys closure appears not to have been influential, however we hypothesise that changing marine currents had an important early influence on their biogeography.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentology, Taphonomy, and Palaeoecology of a Laminated
    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 243 (2007) 92–117 www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Sedimentology, taphonomy, and palaeoecology of a laminated plattenkalk from the Kimmeridgian of the northern Franconian Alb (southern Germany) ⁎ Franz Theodor Fürsich a, , Winfried Werner b, Simon Schneider b, Matthias Mäuser c a Institut für Paläontologie, Universität Würzburg, Pleicherwall 1, 97070 Würzburg, Germany LMU b Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie and GeoBio-Center , Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, D-80333 München, Germany c Naturkunde-Museum Bamberg, Fleischstr. 2, D-96047 Bamberg, Germany Received 8 February 2006; received in revised form 3 July 2006; accepted 7 July 2006 Abstract At Wattendorf in the northern Franconian Alb, southern Germany, centimetre- to decimetre-thick packages of finely laminated limestones (plattenkalk) occur intercalated between well bedded graded grainstones and rudstones that blanket a relief produced by now dolomitized microbialite-sponge reefs. These beds reach their greatest thickness in depressions between topographic highs and thin towards, and finally disappear on, the crests. The early Late Kimmeridgian graded packstone–bindstone alternations represent the earliest plattenkalk occurrence in southern Germany. The undisturbed lamination of the sediment strongly points to oxygen-free conditions on the seafloor and within the sediment, inimical to higher forms of life. The plattenkalk contains a diverse biota of benthic and nektonic organisms. Excavation of a 13 cm thick plattenkalk unit across an area of 80 m2 produced 3500 fossils, which, with the exception of the bivalve Aulacomyella, exhibit a random stratigraphic distribution. Two-thirds of the individuals had a benthic mode of life attached to hard substrate. This seems to contradict the evidence of oxygen-free conditions on the sea floor, such as undisturbed lamination, presence of articulated skeletons, and preservation of soft parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Decapode.Pdf
    We are pleased and honored to welcome at the Paléospace Museum of Villers-sur-Mer the “6th Symposium on Mesozoic and Cenozoic Decapod Crustaceans”. Villers-sur-Mer is a place universally known by specialists and amateurs of palaeontology due to its famous Vaches Noires cliffs. Villers-sur-Mer has also the distinction of being the only French seaside resort located on the Greenwich Meridian line. The Paléospace is a Museum funded in 2011 with the label Musée de France. Three main animations linked to the Time are presented: palaeontology, astronomy and nature with the neighbouring marsh. The museum is in a constant evolution. For instance, an exhibition specially dedicated to dinosaurs was opened two years ago and a planetarium will open next summer. Every year a very high quality temporary exhibition takes place during the summer period with very numerous animations during all the year. The Paléospace does not stop progressing in term of visitors (56 868 in 2015) and its notoriety is universally recognized both by the other museums as by the scientific community. We are very proud of these unexpected results. We thank the dynamism and the professionalism of the Paléospace team which is at the origin of this very great success. We wish you a very good stay at Villers-sur-Mer, a beautiful visit of the Paléospace and especially an excellent congress. Jean-Paul Durand, Mayor and President of Paléospace MOT DU MAIRE DE VILLERS-SUR-MER Nous sommes très heureux et très honorés d’accueillir à Villers-sur-Mer, le « 6e Symposium on Mesozoic and Cenozoic Decapod Crustaceans » dans le cadre du Paléospace.
    [Show full text]
  • Trace Fossils from the Baltoscandian Erratic Boulders in Sw Poland
    Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae (2017), vol. 87: 229–257 doi: https://doi.org/10.14241/asgp.2017.014 TRACE FOSSILS FROM THE BALTOSCANDIAN ERRATIC BOULDERS IN SW POLAND Alina CHRZĄSTEK & Kamil PLUTA Institute of Geological Sciences, Wrocław University; Maksa Borna 9, 50-204 Wrocław, Poland e-mails: [email protected], [email protected] Chrząstek, A. & Pluta, K, 2017. Trace fossils from the Baltoscandian erratic boulders in SW Poland. Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, 87: 229–257. Abstract: Many well preserved trace fossils were found in erratic boulders and the fossils preserved in them, occurring in the Pleistocene glacial deposits of the Fore-Sudetic Block (Mokrzeszów Quarry, Świebodzice outcrop). They include burrows (Arachnostega gastrochaenae, Balanoglossites isp., ?Balanoglossites isp., ?Chondrites isp., Diplocraterion isp., Phycodes isp., Planolites isp., ?Rosselia isp., Skolithos linearis, Thalassinoides isp., root traces) and borings ?Gastrochaenolites isp., Maeandropolydora isp., Oichnus isp., Osprioneides kamp- to, ?Palaeosabella isp., Talpina isp., Teredolites isp., Trypanites weisei, Trypanites isp., ?Trypanites isp., and an unidentified polychaete boring in corals. The boulders, Cambrian to Neogene (Miocene) in age, mainly came from Scandinavia and the Baltic region. The majority of the trace fossils come from the Ordovician Orthoceratite Limestone, which is exposed mainly in southern and central Sweden, western Russia and Estonia, and also in Norway (Oslo Region). The most interesting discovery in these deposits is the occurrence of Arachnostega gastrochaenae in the Ordovician trilobites (?Megistaspis sp. and Asaphus sp.), cephalopods and hyolithids. This is the first report ofArachnostega on a trilobite (?Megistaspis) from Sweden. So far, this ichnotaxon was described on trilobites from Baltoscandia only from the St.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Upper Triassic (Norian) of Northern Carnic Pre-Alps (Udine, Northeastern Italy)
    GORTANIA. Geologia,GORTANIA Paleontologia, Paletnologia 35 (2013) Geologia, Paleontologia, Paletnologia 35 (2013) 11-18 Udine, 10.IX.2014 ISSN: 2038-0410 Alessandro Garassino ACANTHOCHIRANA TRIASSICA N. SP. Günter Schweigert Giuseppe Muscio AND ANTRIMPOS COLETTOI N. SP. (DECAPODA: AEGERIDAE, PENAEIDAE) FROM THE UPPER TRIASSIC (NORIAN) OF NORTHERN CARNIC PRE-ALPS (UDINE, NORTHEASTERN ITALY) Acanthochirana TRIASSICA N. SP. E AntrimPOS COLETTOI N. SP. (DECAPODA: AEGERIDAE, PENAEIDAE) DAL TRIASSICO SUPERIORE (NORICO) DELLA PREALPI CARNICHE SETTENTRIONALI (UDINE, ITALIA NORDORIENTALE) Riassunto breve - I crostacei decapodi del Triassico superiore (Norico) della Dolomia di Forni sono stati descritti da Ga- rassino et al. (1996). La recente scoperta di un piccolo campione, rivenuto nella Valle del Rio Seazza e in quella del Rio Rovadia, ha permesso un aggiornamento relativo ai crostacei decapodi delle Prealpi Carniche. Gli esemplari studiati sono stati assegnati a Acanthochirana triassica n. sp. (Aegeridae Burkenroad, 1963) e Antrimpos colettoi n. sp. (Penaeidae Rafinesque, 1815). Acanthochirana triassica n. sp. estende il range stratigrafico di questo genere nel Triassico superiore, mentre Antrimpos colettoi n. sp. rappresenta la seconda specie di questo genere segnalata nel Triassico superiore d’Italia. La scoperta di queste due nuove specie incrementa il numero delle specie di peneidi conosciuti nel Norico dell’alta Val Ta- gliamento (Prealpi Carniche settentrionali). Parole chiave: Crustacea, Decapoda, Aegeridae, Penaeidae, Triassico superiore, Prealpi Carniche. Abstract - The decapod crustaceans from the Upper Triassic (Norian) of the Dolomia di Forni Formation were reported by Garassino et al. (1996). The recent discovery of a small sample from this Formation between Seazza and Rovadia brooks allowed updating the decapod assemblages from the Norian of Carnic Pre-Alps.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Crustaceans in Cold Seep Ecosystems: Fossil Record, Geographic Distribution, Taxonomic Composition, 2 and Biology 3 4 Adiël A
    1 Crustaceans in cold seep ecosystems: fossil record, geographic distribution, taxonomic composition, 2 and biology 3 4 Adiël A. Klompmaker1, Torrey Nyborg2, Jamie Brezina3 & Yusuke Ando4 5 6 1Department of Integrative Biology & Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, 1005 7 Valley Life Sciences Building #3140, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Email: [email protected] 8 9 2Department of Earth and Biological Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. 10 Email: [email protected] 11 12 3South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701, USA. Email: 13 [email protected] 14 15 4Mizunami Fossil Museum, 1-47, Yamanouchi, Akeyo-cho, Mizunami, Gifu, 509-6132, Japan. 16 Email: [email protected] 17 18 This preprint has been submitted for publication in the Topics in Geobiology volume “Ancient Methane 19 Seeps and Cognate Communities”. Specimen figures are excluded in this preprint because permissions 20 were only received for the peer-reviewed publication. 21 22 Introduction 23 24 Crustaceans are abundant inhabitants of today’s cold seep environments (Chevaldonné and Olu 1996; 25 Martin and Haney 2005; Karanovic and Brandão 2015), and could play an important role in structuring 26 seep ecosystems. Cold seeps fluids provide an additional source of energy for various sulfide- and 27 hydrocarbon-harvesting bacteria, often in symbiosis with invertebrates, attracting a variety of other 28 organisms including crustaceans (e.g., Levin 2005; Vanreusel et al. 2009; Vrijenhoek 2013). The 29 percentage of crustaceans of all macrofaunal specimens is highly variable locally in modern seeps, from 30 0–>50% (Dando et al. 1991; Levin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Decapod Crustaceans from the Middle Jurassic Opalinus Clay of Northern Switzerland, with Comments on Crustacean Taphonomy
    0012-9402/04/030381-12 Eclogae geol. Helv. 97 (2004) 381–392 DOI 10.1007/s00015-004-1137-2 Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2004 Decapod crustaceans from the Middle Jurassic Opalinus Clay of northern Switzerland, with comments on crustacean taphonomy WALTER ETTER Key words: Decapoda, Peracarida, Jurassic, Switzerland, ecology, crustacean taphonomy ABSTRACT ZUSAMMENFASSUNG Four species of decapod crustaceans from the Middle Jurassic Opalinus Clay Aus dem Opalinuston (Mittlerer Jura, Aalenian) der Nordschweiz werden vier (Aalenian) of Northern Switzerland are described. Of these, Mecochirus cf. Arten von decapoden Krebsen beschrieben. Von Aeger sp., Eryma cf. bedelta eckerti is the most common one, while Eryma cf. bedelta, Glyphea sp. and und Glyphaea sp. wurden nur ganz wenige Exemplaren gefunden, während Aeger sp. were present as individuals, or only a few specimens. The preserva- Mecochirus cf. eckerti etwas häufiger ist. Die Erhaltungsbedingungen waren tion of these crustaceans ranges from moderate to excellent, reflecting the während der Ablagerung des Opalinustones günstig, was sich in einer geringen favourable taphonomic conditions of the depositional environment. An inter- Disartikulations- und Fragmentationsrate der Krebse widerspiegelt. Ein in- esting aspect of the taphocoenosis in the Opalinus Clay is that the decapod teressanter Aspekt der Taphocoenose ist die deutliche Dominanz der Klein- crustaceans are by far outnumbered by small peracarid crustaceans (isopods krebse (Peracarida: Isopoden und Tanaidaceen). Dies dürfte die Zahlenver- and tanaids). This is interpreted as reflecting the original differences in abun- hältnisse der ehemaligen Lebensgemeinschaft widerspiegeln. In den meisten dance. Yet this distribution is not frequently encountered in sedimentary se- Ablagerungen dominieren jedoch die decapoden Krebse, wogegen Peracarida quences where decapods (although rare) are far more common than isopods äusserst selten sind.
    [Show full text]
  • Galicia Marianae N. Gen., N. Sp. (Crustacea, Decapoda, Astacidea) from the Oxfordian (Upper Jurassic) of the Southern Polish Uplands
    Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, no. 29 (2002), p. 51-59, 8 figs. Galicia marianae n. gen., n. sp. (Crustacea, Decapoda, Astacidea) from the Oxfordian (Upper Jurassic) of the Southern Polish Uplands Alessandro Garassino* and Michal Krobicki** *Invertebrate Palaeontology Department, Natural History Museum, Corso Venezia, 55, 20121 Milano, Italy <[email protected]> **Department of Stratigraphy and Regional Geology, University of Mining and Metallurgy, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland <[email protected]> Abstract Galicia marianae n. gen., n. sp. is described from the Middle Oxfordian limestones of the Southern Polish Uplands, in vicinity of Kraców. Glyphea (Glyphea) muensteri (Voltz), together with numerous dromiacean prosopid crabs, are associated with the decapod lobster described in this study. The decapod fauna occupied sponge megafacies, well known from throughout Europe, from Portugal, Spain, France, Germany, Poland and Romania. The decapods prefer inter- and/or peri (or extra)- bioherm environments surrounding the cyanobacteria-sponge bioherms. Streszczenie Z utworów wapieni plytowych s´rodkowego oksfordu okolic Krakowa opisano nowy gatunek (nalez˙ a˛cy do nowego rodzaju) dziesie˛cionogiego homara Galicia marianae, oraz gatunek Glyphea (Glyphea) muensteri (Voltz, 1835), znany wczes´niej z obszaru Polski centralnej. Zilustrowano równiez˙ zespól krabów (z rodziny Prosopidae) który dominuje w obre˛bie malych bioherm wapieni ga˛bkowych, znajduja˛cych sie˛ w obre˛bie wapieni plytowych tych samych stanowisk (np. dolina Szklarki). Opisana fauna homarów preferowala paleos´rodowiska s´ródbiohermowe lub peryferycznych cze˛s´ci bioherm cjanobakteryjno-ga˛bkowych, szeroko rozprzestrzenionej w Europie oksfordzkiej megafacji ga˛bkowej znanej w calej Europie (od Portugali, poprzez Hiszpanie˛, Francje˛, Niemcy, Polske˛ az˙ do Rumunii).
    [Show full text]
  • New Studies of Decapod Crustaceans from the Upper Jurassic Lithographic Limestones of Southern Germany
    Contributions to Zoology, 72 (2-3) 173-179 (2003) SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague New studies of decapod crustaceans from the Upper Jurassic lithographic limestones of southern Germany Günter Schweigert¹ & Alessandro Garassino² 2 1 Staatliches Museum fiir Naturkunde, Rosenstein I, D-70I91 Stuttgart, Germany; Museo civico di Storia naturale, Corso Venezia 55, 1-20121 Milano, Italy Keywords:: Crustacea, Decapoda, lithographic limestones, Upper Jurassic, Solnhofen, fossil record, diversity Abstract Introduction The Upper Jurassic lithographic limestones ofsouthern Germany TheUpper Jurassic lithographic limestones in south- have long been known for their exceptional preservation of ern Germany outcrop at numerous localities are of decapod crustaceans (Glaessner, 1965), similar to the Upper and differentage setting and span an area of sev- Cretaceous of Lebanon (Hakel, Hadjoula) and the still poorly eral hundreds of kilometers (Fig. 1, Table 1) with known Callovian strataat La Voulte-sur-Rhône (France). In these localities in the Frankische Alb often summarized non-bioturbatedlimestones, the decay of decapod skeletons is that mineralized and reduced, so besides the heavily chelae as ‘Solnhofen Lithographic Limestones’. Many fos- often even delicate structures such as pleopods and carapace sils, both in old and new collections (fossil traders), antennae are preserved. Recently, new decapod material has which is are labeled ‘Solnhofen’, highly mislead- been obtained from both scientific and commercial excavations, ing and precludes recognition of evolutionary trends in part in reopened lithographic limestone quarries. I. Fossiliferous lithographic limestones in southern Germany. Downloaded from Brill.com09/24/2021 08:25:23AM via free access 174 G. Schweigert & A. Garassino - New studies of Jurassic limestones from Germany Table I.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics, Phylogeny, and Taphonomy of Ghost Shrimps (Decapoda): a Perspective from the Fossil Record
    73 (3): 401 – 437 23.12.2015 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2015. Systematics, phylogeny, and taphonomy of ghost shrimps (Decapoda): a perspective from the fossil record Matúš Hyžný *, 1, 2 & Adiël A. Klompmaker 3 1 Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria; Matúš Hyžný [hyzny.matus@ gmail.com] — 2 Department of Geology and Paleontology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6, SVK-842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia — 3 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, PO Box 117800, Gaines- ville, FL 32611, USA; Adiël A. Klompmaker [[email protected]] — * Correspond ing author Accepted 06.viii.2015. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 14.xii.2015. Editor in charge: Stefan Richter. Abstract Ghost shrimps of Callianassidae and Ctenochelidae are soft-bodied, usually heterochelous decapods representing major bioturbators of muddy and sandy (sub)marine substrates. Ghost shrimps have a robust fossil record spanning from the Early Cretaceous (~ 133 Ma) to the Holocene and their remains are present in most assemblages of Cenozoic decapod crustaceans. Their taxonomic interpretation is in flux, mainly because the generic assignment is hindered by their insufficient preservation and disagreement in the biological classification. Fur- thermore, numerous taxa are incorrectly classified within the catch-all taxonCallianassa . To show the historical patterns in describing fos- sil ghost shrimps and to evaluate taphonomic aspects influencing the attribution of ghost shrimp remains to higher level taxa, a database of all fossil species treated at some time as belonging to the group has been compiled: 250 / 274 species are considered valid ghost shrimp taxa herein.
    [Show full text]
  • On Unreported Historical Specimens of Marine Arthropods from The
    On unreported historical specimens of marine arthropods from the Solnhofen and Nusplingen Lithographic Limestones (Late Jurassic, Germany) housed at the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris Giliane P. Odin, Sylvain Charbonnier, Julien Devillez, Günter Schweigert To cite this version: Giliane P. Odin, Sylvain Charbonnier, Julien Devillez, Günter Schweigert. On unreported historical specimens of marine arthropods from the Solnhofen and Nusplingen Lithographic Limestones (Late Jurassic, Germany) housed at the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. Geodiversitas, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle Paris, 2019, 41 (1), pp.643. 10.5252/geodiversitas2019v41a17. hal- 02332523 HAL Id: hal-02332523 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02332523 Submitted on 24 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. On unreported historical specimens of marine arthropods from the Solnhofen and Nusplingen Lithographic Limestones (Late Jurassic, Germany) housed at the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris Sur des spécimens historiques inédits d’arthropodes marins des Calcaires Lithographiques de Solnhofen et Nusplingen (Jurassique supérieur, Allemagne) conservés au Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris Unreported specimens of marine arthropods from Solnhofen Giliane P. ODIN Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie – Paris (CR2P, UMR 7207), Sorbonne Université, MNHN, CNRS, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Origines & Evolution (CP38), 8 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris (France).
    [Show full text]