Arxiv:1107.4499V2 [Q-Bio.CB] 1 Dec 2011
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 Mitochondrial Variability as a Source nism, supported by a substantial number of recent and new ex- of Extrinsic Cellular Noise periments, by which cell-to-cell differences in both the number Iain G. Johnston1;2, Bernadett Gaal1;3, Ricardo Pires das and functionality of mitochondria { the organelles responsible Neves4;5, Tariq Enver3, Francisco J. Iborra6;∗, Nick S. for energy production in eukaryotes { leads to variability in Jones1;2;7;y transcription rate between cells and may hence be a significant 1 Department of Physics and CABDyN Complexity source of cellular noise in many downstream processes. We Centre, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford, illustrate the downstream effect of mitochondrial variability United Kingdom through simulated studies of protein expression and stem cell 2 Oxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, differentiation, and suggest possible experimental approaches Department of Biochemistry, South Parks Road, to further elucidate this mechanism. Oxford, United Kingdom 3 UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, Gower Street, London, United Kingdom Introduction 4 Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal Stochastic influences significantly affect a multitude of pro- 5 Biomaterials and Stem Cell-based Therapeutics cesses in cellular biology [1{5]. Understanding the sources of Group and Biocant { Center of Innovation and this randomness within and between cells is a central current Biotechnology, 3060-197 Cantanhede, Portugal challenge in quantitative biology. Noise has been found to af- 6 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, fect processes including stem cell fate decisions [6], bet-hedging Centro Nacional de Biotecnolog´ıa,Consejo Superior in bacterial phenotypes [7, 8], cancer development [9], and de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas,Madrid, Spain responses to apoptosis-inducing factors [10, 11]. In this pa- 7 Department of Mathematics, Imperial College per, we consider how mitochondria may constitute a significant London, Huxley Building, 180 Queen's Gate, source of this cellular noise. London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom Noise in cellular processes may result from sources intrinsic ∗ Email: [email protected] to the gene in question (those responsible for differences in the y Email: [email protected] expression levels of genes under identical regulation in the same cell) or extrinsic sources (those responsible for cell-to-cell varia- tion in genes under identical regulation in a population). Both Abstract intrinsic and extrinsic noise sources contribute to the overall noise observed in, for example, transcription rates and protein We present a study investigating the role of mitochondrial expression levels [12]. The interplay between intrinsic and ex- variability in generating noise in eukaryotic cells. Noise in trinsic noise can be characterised with elegant experimental cellular physiology plays an important role in many funda- techniques such as dual reporter measurements [3], in which mental cellular processes, including transcription, translation, the expression levels of two proteins are measured within cells stem cell differentiation and response to medication, but the and within a population, but subtleties exist in disambiguat- specific random influences that affect these processes have yet ing intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to noise levels [13]. to be clearly elucidated. Here we present a mechanism by Some studies have found the contribution of extrinsic factors which variability in mitochondrial volume and functionality, to overall noise levels to be stronger in eukaryotes [14, 15] than along with cell cycle dynamics, is linked to variability in tran- prokaryotes [3], although others debate this interpretation [16]. scription rate and hence has a profound effect on downstream To investigate these influences, several mathematical models cellular processes. Our model mechanism is supported by an for the emergence of intrinsic and extrinsic cellular noise have appreciable volume of recent experimental evidence, and we been introduced and explored [12, 17{24]. In addition, recent present the results of several new experiments with which our studies have investigated, both experimentally and theoreti- model is also consistent. We find that noise due to mitochon- cally, the architecture of extrinsic noise and its causal factors drialarXiv:1107.4499v2 [q-bio.CB] 1 Dec 2011 variability can sometimes dominate over other extrinsic [14{16, 19, 25{27], though substantial uncertainty surrounds noise sources (such as cell cycle asynchronicity) and can signifi- the importance of individual contributions (such as variability cantly affect large-scale observable properties such as cell cycle in cell cycle stage and cellular volume) to extrinsic noise [28]. length and gene expression levels. We also explore two recent Huh and Paulsson recently argued that uneven segregration regulatory network-based models for stem cell differentiation, of cellular constituents at mitosis can contribute significantly and find that extrinsic noise in transcription rate causes ap- to cell-to-cell differences in levels of cellular components and preciable variability in the behaviour of these model systems. proteins in a population, focusing on stochasticity in protein These results suggest that mitochondrial and transcriptional inheritance between sister cells [29, 30]. We focus on a spe- variability may be an important mechanism influencing a large cific instance of this phenomenon: cell-to-cell variability in the variety of cellular processes and properties. mitochondrial content of cells. An experimental study per- formed by das Neves et al. identified uneven partitioning of mitochondria at mitosis as being a possibly significant source Author Summary of extrinsic noise in eukaryotes [31], supporting recent theo- retical ideas [30]. Mitochondria have been found to display Cellular variability has been found to play a major role in remarkably complex behaviour interwoven with cellular pro- diverse and important phenomena, including stem cell differ- cesses [32{34] and to display significant heterogeneity within entiation and drug resistance, but the sources of this variability cells [31, 35{37]. Mitochondrial influences on processes in- have yet to be satisfactorily explained. We propose a mecha- cluding stem cell differentation [38] and cell cycle progression 2 [39{41] have recently been observed. more refined models. das Neves et al. [31] observe a wide spread of mitochon- drial masses in a population of cells, illustrating extrinsic vari- ability in organelle distribution. Mitochondrial functionality Model has also been observed to vary between cells [34, 35, 42{44]. das Neves et al. also observed a link between mitochondrial While the heterogeneity of mitochondria has been observed mass and membrane potential and cellular ATP levels, and experimentally and connected to variability in processes like found transcription rate to be a function of ATP concentra- transcription [31] and stem cell differentiation [38], the mecha- tion. In addition, the modulation of mitochondrial function- nisms by which mitochondrial variability influences other cel- ality, through anti- and pro-oxidant treatments, was found to lular processes has not been elucidated clearly. Here, we de- alter cell-to-cell variability in transcription rates, with anti- scribe a simple model which formalises these links, and note oxidants significantly reducing variability and pro-oxidants in- that it reproduces recent experimental results concerning mi- creasing variability. These results suggest that cell-to-cell het- tochondrial heterogeneity (and variability in connected cellular erogeneity in mitochondrial mass and functionality may prop- features) [31]. The simplicity of our model means that ana- agate into extrinsic noise in transcription rate, and thenceforth lytic expressions can be derived for many quantities of inter- processes further downstream, but the quantitative links be- est, facilitating a more complete and intuitive understanding hind these processes remain unclear. We introduce a simple of the modelled biological connections. We will then use this approach, consistent with a range of experimental observa- model to investigate more specific questions regarding the links tions, that quantitatively connects all these features and pre- between mitochondrial variability and transcription rate and dicts the downstream physiological influence of mitochondrial stem cell differentiation. variability. The central concept behind our model is illustrated in Fig. Shahrezaei et al. [45] have recently shown that extrinsic 1. Individual cells are characterised by three key variables: the noise can influence levels of intrinsic noise, as cell-to-cell vari- volume of the cell (v); the amount of mitochondrial mass in ability in the rates of processes such as transcription and trans- the cell (n); and the degree of mitochondrial functionality (f). lation affect the intrinsic dynamics of gene expression. In ad- This last quantity, f, represents a coarse-grained measure of dition, they provided an extension to standard stochastic sim- the efficiency of mitochondria within a cell { a factor which ulation techniques to allow this variability in the production may be affected, for example, by the levels of reactive oxygen rates of chemical species to be accurately simulated { a prob- species (ROS), mitochondrial membrane potential, variability lem that has been approached using different techniques in pre- in mitochondrial