The Role of Air Transport Development in Adriatic- Ionian Macroregion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Role of Air Transport Development in Adriatic- Ionian Macroregion International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 2015, 5(4): 344 - 359 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7708/ijtte.2015.5(4).01 UDC: 656.7(262.3) THE ROLE OF AIR TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT IN ADRIATIC- IONIAN MACROREGION Olja Čokorilo1, Ivana Čavka2 1, 2 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia Received 22 July 2015; accepted 9 September 2015 Abstract: The main objective of the proposed research is to improve the accessibility and the mobility of passengers across the Adriatic area and its hinterland, through the development of new sustainable and integrated transport services and the improvement of physical infrastructures related to those new services, particulary in the air transport connectivity and accesability. Analysis is oriented on existing infrastructure, connections and available aircraft fleet capacities based on three possible scenarios which are identified on the recommendations of renominated statistical data (Eurocontrol, Boeing, Airbus). Microregional improvements could be the key drivers for the macro economical issues where air transport plays significant role. Aircraft fleet, load factor and tourist destination atractivnes significantly improve hinterlend connectivities within Adriatic ports for both ferry and cruise passengers. Keywords: air transport, hinterland, Adriatic region. 1. Introduction modern transport demands have enabled the largest share of road transport at the Hinterland connections in Adriatic-Ionian level of the whole transport market. Rapid macroregion that covers coastal areas in six road transport development can lead to different countries (Italy, Slovenia, Croatia, congestions on the main routes in ports as Montenegro, Albania and Greece) are a well, and it may have a negative influence precondicion of ports development in this on the environment and the health of the region. The paper provides the evaluation population and decrease of traffic safety of the integration among Adriatic ports and level. Therefore, it is necessary to make their hinterland enabled with air transport conditions for redirection of the demand network that allows identifying needs to other transport modes with the aim of and priorities, bottlenecks, potentials for controlling the excessive development of passenger transport services/lines and their the road transport. possible future integrations (Čokorilo et al., 2015). Railways are important part of European transport system and significant contributor It is important to notice at this point, road to achieving the sustainable transport in the transport which is of the utmost importance future. Road and railway traffic networks for the functioning of ferry and cruiser traffic are an indispensable prerequisite for the flows in Adriatic-Ionian region. Expressed development and competitiveness of the flexibility and ability to quickly respond to ports in the Adriatic-Ionian region. 1 Corresponding author: [email protected] 344 Čokorilo O. et al. The Role of Air Transport Development in Adriatic-Ionian Macroregion New air links within the Adriatic region divided in two main subchapters. The first could also considerably improve mobility subchapter provides assessment of the and accelerate economic integration and Adriatic national airlines while the second cooperation processes. However, the problem is focused on the Adriatic basin airports of intraregional connectivity prevails, where network analysing them through the majority of destinations from and to the following topics: a) ownership structures; b) Adriatic airports are in the Western Europe geostrategic valorisation; c) transportation and minor of all air transport operations in connectivity; d) infrastructure assessment the region are realised within the Adriatic and e) traffic performance. Additional network. Underdeveloped connections attention within this chapter is dedicated to between the Adriatic ports and major cities historical overview of the global air transport represent a barrier for fast and convenient main figures. travel within the region. 3.1. Assessment of the Adriatic-Ionian 2. Literature Review National Airlines Air transport development is a multi The break-up of Yugoslavia and associated functional process which mostly depends confrontations caused geopolitical and on aviation market in terms of regional economic changes in the SEE region, economic development and liberalization which resulted in fragmentation of once (Graham, 1997; Graham, 1998; Graham unified transport market and accordingly and Guyer, 1999; Thompson, 2002). reduction of air transport volumes. Each Contemporary regional studies and research country independently established their are focused mostly on economical aspects national airlines as well as the hub airports due to the touristic development within which are situated in the countries capital particular zones (Yamaguchi, 2007; Brooke cities. Due to the unstable political situation et al., 1994; Prideaux, 2000). Moreover, within the region supported by the lack of some authors are oriented on modeling bilateral agreements between the countries, environmental issues within the certain each country established their route network region (Abeyratne, 1999; Houyoux et al., mainly towards the Western Europe 2000) or climate change problems (Mickley countries while intraregional connectivity et al., 2004). Decision makers are more was neglected. oriented in creating policies which will anable air transport market defragmentation After signing the ECAA agreement, the and connectivity improvements (Button et air services were liberalised and the route al., 1998; Steiner et al., 2008; Šimecki et network has grown rapidly. New established al., 2013). routes are connecting European destinations within the Adriatic region serving 3. Airports and Air Connections in the neighbouring hub airports as feeders while Region regional main airport, which could compare to European hubs, have been established The following chapter elaborates current mainly in Italy. It implicates the lack of state of air transport within and outside the domestic traffic, with exception in Italy and Adriatic region through separate analysis Croatia, which highlights the importance of 345 International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 2015, 5(4): 344 - 359 cross border international traffic on regional list of national airlines in the Adriatic Ionian level. Table 1 provides overview of the current basin (Čavka and Čokorilo, 2015). Table 1 List of National Airlines and Related Indicators of Air Transport in the Adriatic-Ionian Basin Former Number of Aircraft Number of Country National аirline Ownership ownership aircraft types destinations Albanian Airlines, Albania - - ceased - - - operation in 2011 Bosnia and Government 2 B&H Airlines - 2 ATR 72-212 4 Herzegovina 99.93% Government 4 A319 2 Croatia Croatia Airlines - 12 27 96.22% A320 6 Q400 22 A319 Fully private 47 A320 company Italy Alitalia - 103 12 A321 83 with 24 12 A330 shareholders 10 B777 1 E-190LR Montenegro Government Montenegro - 6 3 E-195LR 13 Airlines 100% 2 Fokker 100 2 A319 Government Slovenia Adria Airways - 10 2 CRJ200LR 23 69.9% 6 CRJ900LR Main indicators of current state of air Austrian Airlines traffic volume (10.9 transport in the Adriatic region are million passengers). It reflects enormous modes traffic flows that represent 2% of change considering a pre-war period (1989) passenger transportation in the world when Yugoslavian JAT alone carried double schedule traffic and 1.5% of the number of passengers than Austrian Airlines. international airports in the world as well as underdeveloped intra-regional connectivity Due to low performance of national airlines, and lack of intercontinental flights (Čavka private sector incursion started in 1997 and Čokorilo, 2015). transposing Albanian Airlines shares to M.A. Kharafi & Sons group. The process Recent territorial fragmentation of the continued in 2008 by its further transposing SEE region resulted in the creation of to Advanced Construction Group (ACG3) new independent States from which each and soon after in 2009 to Azerbaijan based has established its national flag carrier. Turkish Evsen Group of Companies (93%) Cumulative traffic volume of the SEE while 7% remained in ACG. However, it airlines2 (4.4 million passengers) in the year could be stated that mentioned privatisation 2010 was 1.5 times lower than neighbouring was not successful as Albania’s Civil Aviation 2 BH Airlines, Croatia Airlines, Montenegro Аirlines, 3 ACG - Advanced Construction Group Air Serbia (ex. JAT Airways) 346 Čokorilo O. et al. The Role of Air Transport Development in Adriatic-Ionian Macroregion Authority took the decision in November continued in 2008 by Turkish Airlines 2011 to revoke the operating license of acquiring 49 percent of the BH airlines from Albanian Airlines leading to a suspension the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina of flights operated by the company. that lasted until mid 2012 when Turkish Airlines cancelled the agreement with BH Unsuccessful privatisation of public Airlines due to inability of BH Government transport companies in the SEE region to invest in the joint venture. Fig. 1. Indicators of Passenger Traffic Carried by National Airlines in the Adriatic Basin Fig. 1 shows that Alitalia is the leading airline growing market of Middle East. The Adriatic (in terms of passengers) in the Adriatic region has a favourable geo-strategic position region. Albanian Airlines recorded the for attracting
Recommended publications
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY July 2014 EDITION
    WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY July 2014 EDITION CONTENTS I. REGULATORY NEWS .............................................................................................. 1 II. AIRPORTS ................................................................................................................ 4 III. SECURITY AND DATA PRIVACY ……………………..................................................7 IV. E-COMMERCE AND TECHNOLOGY ....................................................................... 9 V. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................. 11 VI. U.S. CONGRESS .................................................................................................... 12 VII. BILATERAL AND STATE DEPARTMENT NEWS ................................................... 14 VIII. EUROPE/AFRICA ................................................................................................... 15 IX. ASIA/PACIFIC/MIDDLE EAST ................................................................................ 17 X. AMERICAS ............................................................................................................. 20 For further information, including documents referenced, contact: Joanne W. Young Kirstein & Young PLLC 1750 K Street NW Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 331-3348 Fax: (202) 331-3933 Email: [email protected] http://www.yklaw.com The Kirstein & Young law firm specializes in representing U.S. and foreign airlines, airports, leasing companies, financial institutions
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment F – Participants in the Agreement
    Revenue Accounting Manual B16 ATTACHMENT F – PARTICIPANTS IN THE AGREEMENT 1. TABULATION OF PARTICIPANTS 0B 475 BLUE AIR AIRLINE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS S.R.L. 1A A79 AMADEUS IT GROUP SA 1B A76 SABRE ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD. 1G A73 Travelport International Operations Limited 1S A01 SABRE INC. 2D 54 EASTERN AIRLINES, LLC 2I 156 STAR UP S.A. 2I 681 21 AIR LLC 2J 226 AIR BURKINA 2K 547 AEROLINEAS GALAPAGOS S.A. AEROGAL 2T 212 TIMBIS AIR SERVICES 2V 554 AMTRAK 3B 383 Transportes Interilhas de Cabo Verde, Sociedade Unipessoal, SA 3E 122 MULTI-AERO, INC. DBA AIR CHOICE ONE 3J 535 Jubba Airways Limited 3K 375 JETSTAR ASIA AIRWAYS PTE LTD 3L 049 AIR ARABIA ABDU DHABI 3M 449 SILVER AIRWAYS CORP. 3S 875 CAIRE DBA AIR ANTILLES EXPRESS 3U 876 SICHUAN AIRLINES CO. LTD. 3V 756 TNT AIRWAYS S.A. 3X 435 PREMIER TRANS AIRE INC. 4B 184 BOUTIQUE AIR, INC. 4C 035 AEROVIAS DE INTEGRACION REGIONAL 4L 174 LINEAS AEREAS SURAMERICANAS S.A. 4M 469 LAN ARGENTINA S.A. 4N 287 AIR NORTH CHARTER AND TRAINING LTD. 4O 837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. 4S 644 SOLAR CARGO, C.A. 4U 051 GERMANWINGS GMBH 4X 805 MERCURY AIR CARGO, INC. 4Z 749 SA AIRLINK 5C 700 C.A.L. CARGO AIRLINES LTD. 5J 203 CEBU PACIFIC AIR 5N 316 JOINT-STOCK COMPANY NORDAVIA - REGIONAL AIRLINES 5O 558 ASL AIRLINES FRANCE 5T 518 CANADIAN NORTH INC. 5U 911 TRANSPORTES AEREOS GUATEMALTECOS S.A. 5X 406 UPS 5Y 369 ATLAS AIR, INC. 50 Standard Agreement For SIS Participation – B16 5Z 225 CEMAIR (PTY) LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • LOT Polish Airlines – ET Policy
    BULLETIN 19/2008 For: All IATA Agents in BSP Italy Date: 16 Maggio 2008 Subject: LOT Polish Airlines – ET Policy Egregi Agenti, Si prega voler prendere giusta nota che IATA non-è in alcun modo responsabile del contenuto della comunicazione. Per qualsiasi dubbio o chiarimento vi preghiamo voler contattare direttamente la Compagnia Aerea Distinti Saluti, Service Centre Europe International Air Transport Association Service Centre Europe Torre Europa Paseo de la Castellana, 95 28046 Madrid, Spain www.iata.org/europe/cs LOT Polish Airlines S.A. 12 May 2008 Sale of LO (080) documents by IATA Agents on/after 1 June 2008 Dear IATA Agent, We would like to inform you that on/after 1 June 2008 issuance of etix will be possible on the whole LOT network and routes of LOT Interline Electronic Ticketing /IET/ Partner Airlines participating in the carriage. Until today LOT has implemented IET with 69 carriers and further agreements are planned for implementation. Sale of etix is possible in the following GDSs: Amadeus, Galileo, Worldspan, Apollo and Sabre. Current list of LOT Interline Electronic Ticketing Partner Airlines: Adria Airways JP Finnair AY Aeroflot SU Hahn Air HR Air Astana KC Iberia IB Air Baltic BT Icelandair FI Air Berlin AB Japan Airlines Intl JL Air Canada AC Jat Airways JU Air China CA KLM Royal Dutch Airlines KL Air France AF Korean Airlines KE Air Malta KM Lan Airlines LA Air Mauritius MK Lanargentina 4M Air Namibia SW Lanecuador Aerolane SA XL Air New Zealand NZ Lanperu LP Air One AP LTU Intl Airways LT Alitalia AZ Luxair LG All Nippon Airways NH Malev Hungarian Airlines MA American Airlines AA Nacil Air India AI Asiana Airlines OZ Northwest Airlines NW Austrian Airlines OS Qantas Airways QF Belavia B2 Qatar Airways QR Blue1 KF SAS Scandinavian Airlines SK bmi BD Shanghai Airlines FM British Airways BA Singapore Airlines SQ Brussels Airlines SN South African Airways SA Cabo Verde Airlines VR Spanair JK LOT Polish Airlines S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronological History
    A Chronological History December 2016 Pedro Heilbron, CEO of Copa Airlines, elected as new Chairman of the Star Alliance Chief Executive Board November 2016 Star Alliance Gold Track launched in Frankfurt, Star Alliance’s busiest hub October 2016 Juneyao Airlines announced as future Connecting Partner of Star Allianceseal partnership August 2016 Star Alliance adds themed itineraries to its Round the World product portfolio July 2016 Star Alliance Los Angeles lounge wins Skytrax Award for second year running Star Alliance takes ‘Best Alliance’ title at Skytrax World Airline Awards June 2016 New self-service check-in processes launched in Tokyo-Narita Star Alliance announces Jeffrey Goh will take over as Star Alliance CEO from 2017, on the retirement of Mark Schwab Swiss hosts Star Alliance Chief Executive Board meeting in Zurich. The CEOs arrive on the first passenger flight of the Bombardier C Series. Page 1 of 1 Page 2 of 2 April 2016 Star Alliance: Global travel solutions for conventions and meetings at IMEX March 2016 Star Alliance invites lounge guests to share tips via #irecommend February 2016 Star Alliance airlines launch new check-in processes at Los Angeles’ Tom Bradley International Terminal (TBIT) Star Alliance Gold Card holders enjoy free upgrades on Heathrow Express trains Star Alliance supports Ramsar’s Youth Photo Contest – Alliance’s Biosphere Connections initiative now in its ninth year January 2016 Gold Track priority at security added as a Star Alliance Gold Status benefit December 2015 Star Alliance launches Connecting
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Paul Stephen Dempsey
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2008 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Before Alliances, there was Pan American World Airways . and Trans World Airlines. Before the mega- Alliances, there was interlining, facilitated by IATA Like dogs marking territory, airlines around the world are sniffing each other's tail fins looking for partners." Daniel Riordan “The hardest thing in working on an alliance is to coordinate the activities of people who have different instincts and a different language, and maybe worship slightly different travel gods, to get them to work together in a culture that allows them to respect each other’s habits and convictions, and yet work productively together in an environment in which you can’t specify everything in advance.” Michael E. Levine “Beware a pact with the devil.” Martin Shugrue Airline Motivations For Alliances • the desire to achieve greater economies of scale, scope, and density; • the desire to reduce costs by consolidating redundant operations; • the need to improve revenue by reducing the level of competition wherever possible as markets are liberalized; and • the desire to skirt around the nationality rules which prohibit multinational ownership and cabotage. Intercarrier Agreements · Ticketing-and-Baggage Agreements · Joint-Fare Agreements · Reciprocal Airport Agreements · Blocked Space Relationships · Computer Reservations Systems Joint Ventures · Joint Sales Offices and Telephone Centers · E-Commerce Joint Ventures · Frequent Flyer Program Alliances · Pooling Traffic & Revenue · Code-Sharing Code Sharing The term "code" refers to the identifier used in flight schedule, generally the 2-character IATA carrier designator code and flight number. Thus, XX123, flight 123 operated by the airline XX, might also be sold by airline YY as YY456 and by ZZ as ZZ9876.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 1 Analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 EUROPEAN COMMISSION EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 2 Air Transport and Airport Research Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 German Aerospace Center Deutsches Zentrum German Aerospace für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Center in the Helmholtz-Association Air Transport and Airport Research December 2008 Linder Hoehe 51147 Cologne Germany Head: Prof. Dr. Johannes Reichmuth Authors: Erik Grunewald, Amir Ayazkhani, Dr. Peter Berster, Gregor Bischoff, Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer, Dr. Marc Gelhausen, Wolfgang Grimme, Michael Hepting, Hermann Keimel, Petra Kokus, Dr. Peter Meincke, Holger Pabst, Dr. Janina Scheelhaase web: http://www.dlr.de/fw Annual Report 2007 2008-12-02 Release: 2.2 Page 1 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 Document Control Information Responsible project manager: DG Energy and Transport Project task: Annual analyses of the European air transport market 2007 EC contract number: TREN/05/MD/S07.74176 Release: 2.2 Save date: 2008-12-02 Total pages: 222 Change Log Release Date Changed Pages or Chapters Comments 1.2 2008-06-20 Final Report 2.0 2008-10-10 chapters 1,2,3 Final Report - full year 2007 draft 2.1 2008-11-20 chapters 1,2,3,5 Final updated Report 2.2 2008-12-02 all Layout items Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate-General for Energy and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract TREN/05/MD/S07.74176.
    [Show full text]
  • STAR ALLIANCE to ESTABLISH CENTRE of EXCELLENCE in SINGAPORE New Setup Reflects Global Character of the Alliance
    STAR ALLIANCE TO ESTABLISH CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE IN SINGAPORE New setup reflects global character of the Alliance FRANKFURT – March 22, 2021 – Star Alliance will establish a management office in the city state of Singapore later this year. This was a decision taken by its Chief Executive Board, comprising the Chief Executive Officers of its 26 member airlines, who considered a new centre of excellence to be an important dimension of positioning the Alliance to deliver on its post-Coronavirus strategy, and for it to remain innovative, resilient and nimble. All businesses are reimagining a post-pandemic world fundamentally changed by COVID-19, and the associated disruption to global networks, economies, and the livelihoods of many. A consequence of the world’s reaction to COVID-19 has been the destabilizing effect it has had on aviation. This decision to future-proof the Alliance was made against this backdrop. Effectively, Star Alliance will maintain two centres of excellence internationally, in keeping with the global character of the Alliance. The Singapore office will complement the long-standing office in Frankfurt, Germany and will focus on progressing its strategy in digital customer experience. Two members of the Alliance, Lufthansa and Singapore Airlines, have established innovation hubs in the City, another benefit as the Alliance continues its ground-breaking digital customer experience innovations. Singapore was selected based on considered criteria, such as access to innovation and global competitiveness. Singapore has also been ranked highly for the ease of doing business by the World Bank on a consistent basis and has been ranked the most competitive country in the world on several occasions.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly OTP July 2019
    Monthly OTP July 2019 ON-TIME PERFORMANCE AIRLINES Contents On-Time is percentage of flights that depart or arrive within 15 minutes of schedule. Global OTP rankings are only assigned to all Airlines/Airports where OAG has status coverage for at least 80% of the scheduled flights. Regional Airlines Status coverage will only be based on actual gate times rather than estimated times. This July result in some airlines / airports being excluded from this report. If you would like to review your flight status feed with OAG pleas [email protected] MAKE SMARTER MOVES Airline Monthly OTP – July 2019 Page 1 of 1 Home GLOBAL AIRLINES – TOP 50 AND BOTTOM 50 TOP AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance BOTTOM AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size SATA International-Azores GA Garuda Indonesia 93.9% 1 13,798 52 S4 30.8% 160 833 253 Airlines S.A. XL LATAM Airlines Ecuador 92.0% 2 954 246 ZI Aigle Azur 47.8% 159 1,431 215 HD AirDo 90.2% 3 1,806 200 OA Olympic Air 50.6% 158 7,338 92 3K Jetstar Asia 90.0% 4 2,514 168 JU Air Serbia 51.6% 157 3,302 152 CM Copa Airlines 90.0% 5 10,869 66 SP SATA Air Acores 51.8% 156 1,876 196 7G Star Flyer 89.8% 6 1,987 193 A3 Aegean Airlines 52.1% 155 5,446 114 BC Skymark Airlines 88.9% 7 4,917 122 WG Sunwing Airlines Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2050 – the Future of Air Transport the Association of European Airlines (AEA) Welcomes the European Commission's Initiative
    Association of European Airlines Avenue Louise 350 B - 1050 Brussels Tel. +32 (0)2 639 89 89 Fax 639 89 99 Adria Airways E-mail [email protected] Web www.aea.be Aer Lingus AeroSvit Air France 2050 – The future of air transport Air Malta Air One The Association of European Airlines (AEA) welcomes the European Commission’s Alitalia initiative to draft a Communication on the Future of Transport, and wishes to contribute the following comments: Austrian bmi This paper is based on two assumptions: • There is currently no practical alternative to air travel for mid- to long- British Airways distance journeys (>1,000km), although high-speed trains (HST) can Brussels Airlines efficiently replace, or compete with, air transport for journeys of less than 1,000km. This situation will probably continue for the next few decades. Cargolux • Demand for air travel, especially long-distance freight and passenger Croatia Airlines transport demand, will continue to grow, as it has almost continually since the 1960s; Cyprus Airways This scenario must however be refined by the addition of elements that will almost Czech Airlines certainly affect air transport in the future, and more especially in Europe, i.e.: • Aviation’s dependency on fossil fuels; DHL • Capacity crunch. Finnair Iberia A demand for more efficiency Icelandair Jat Airways Demand for air transport will not subside, just the contrary, but its nature will progressively evolve following the line of the population trends (ageing and more KLM eclectic due to immigration) and business (ever more “global”). Passengers, freight LOT forwarders, etc. will want to be able to simply tap into their mobile phone, internet, i- pod or similar devices to enter their departure address and required destination Lufthansa address, their required level of service, number of people and amount of freight to be Luxair transported, dates of requested travel, commercial options, method of payment, and other special requirements, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Alliances
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State .
    [Show full text]
  • Lottery Registration for 2020 Empire State Building Run-Up Presented by Turkish Airlines Powered by the Challenged Athletes Foundation Opens on January 7, 2020
    Lottery Registration for 2020 Empire State Building Run-Up Presented by Turkish Airlines Powered by the Challenged Athletes Foundation Opens on January 7, 2020 The 43rd Annual Event is Scheduled for Tuesday, May 12, 2020 New York, NY – December 18, 2019— Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE: ESRT) today announced that lottery registration for the 2020 Empire State Building Run-Up (ESBRU) Presented by Turkish Airlines and Powered by the Challenged Athletes Foundation, will open on Tuesday, January 7, 2020, at 12:00 p.m. EST and close on Sunday, February 9, 2020, at 11:59 p.m. EST. The 43rd annual ESBRU will be held on Tuesday, May 12, 2020, at 8:00 p.m. EST. Runners who apply to climb the 1,576 steps and 86 floors of the World’s Most Famous Building will be notified of their race status on February 12, 2020. Interested runners can register online at http://www.nycruns.com/esb. Of the thousands of runners from around the world who enter the ESBRU lottery, a select few will have the opportunity to participate. Race entry is $125 per applicant and will only be charged if the applicant is randomly selected to participate. “The Empire State Building Run-Up is the world’s most iconic tower race and the only athletic challenge that takes place at the World’s Most Famous Building,” said Anthony E. Malkin, Chairman and CEO of ESRT. “We invite athletes from across the globe to compete in this bucket-list competition.” Turkish Airlines, Turkey's national flag carrier and the airline that flies to more countries and international destinations than any other airline, returns for its third year as presenting sponsor of the Run-Up.
    [Show full text]