This table of sites relates to options discussed in the ‘Mendip’ section of the Consultation Document. It is recommended you read this section to gain a wider understanding of the issues and options relating to the district as a whole.

PLEASE NOTE: The sites listed below are NOT proposals for development put forward by the Council. They are simply a range of options that we need to consider should any additional development be needed.

Sites around /Radstock Sites put forward by Landowners for Consideration*

Ref and Area Key Site Constraints and Initial Potential Location (ha) Characteristics Considerations Assessment Development Option IF Needed? Local Plan part I indicates that meeting district housing need on the fringe of Midsomer Norton remains an option to be explored in Local Plan Part II (see para 4.7). Allocation of land would need to be in agreement with Bath on the infrastructure impacts and requirements of any development. NRAD001M Arable field on the  Peripheral location Land is Potentially southern fringe of to the town centre potentially Land at White Midsomer Norton.  Landscape Impacts suitable subject Post, Between Residential  Infrastructure to landscape the Fosseway development (in impacts outside mitigation and and Silver BANES) has been the District. highways/ Street, approved on land to  Neither the Bath infrastructure Midsomer the north. adopted Local Plan issues. Norton and emerging Promoter has Neighbourhood Development indicated that a Plan envisage would require school site could be greenfield consultation and provided on this land extensions to the a co-operative alongside residential. settlement or that approach with additional housing the adjoining allocations are local authority sustainable

NRAD003 Land on the western  Peripheral location Land around the Potentially edge of Midsomer to the town centre farm is potentially Norton enclosed by  Underhill Wood is suitable but Land at Underhill Wood a Local Wildlife access and Underhill Farm Site developable are and north of Promoter has  Infrastructure constrained by Underhill Lane indicated a much impacts outside possible loss of more substantial the District. woodland and area of land to the  Woodland wildlife impacts. west is also available contributes to for development setting of the town Land to the north  Local highway of Underhill Lane Existing access to capacity is less Underhill Farm  Floodrisk constrained (though wildlife site) (northern parcel of land) Development  Neither Bath would require adopted Local Plan consultation and and emerging a co-operative Neighbourhood approach with Plan envisage the adjoining greenfield local authority extensions to the settlement or that additional housing allocations are sustainable NRAD004 Land promoted as a  Peripheral location Small site suitable Potentially 'rounding off' on an to the town centre in principle as an Land at adjacent extension to Road development site consented () outside the District scheme which has outline permission for 53 dwellings.

Application at appeal (2014/1587) NRAD005 6.7 Site promoted  Significant Potentially Potentially through a planning infrastructure suitable although Land west of application for 151 impacts outside recent planning the A367 at dwellings the District. application has Westfield (2014/0093/OTA)  Landscape Impact highlighted  Peripheral location significant local to the town centre infrastructure  Neither Bath issues to be adopted Local Plan addressed and emerging including Neighbourhood drainage, Plan envisage highways, greenfield education etc. extensions to the Development settlement or that would require additional housing consultation and allocations are a co-operative sustainable approach with the adjoining local authority