DOCSLIB.ORG

2000 CONTACT: Matthew Gabe (702) 486-3793

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Protecting Citizens, Solving Problems, Making Government Work FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 31, 2000 CONTACT: Matthew Gabe (702) 486-3793 INCLINE VILLAGE MAN ARRESTED FOR LAS VEGAS INVESTMENT SCAM Las Vegas - Attorney General Frankie Sue Del Papa has announced that Todd A. Surgeon, age 29, of Incline Village, Nevada, has been arrested on charges related to his involvement in a scheme that allegedly defrauded Las Vegas residents out of more than $425,000 in investments. Surgeon was taken into custody this past weekend by investigators from the Nevada Attorney General's Office and the Nevada Secretary of State, Securities Division. According to a seven-count felony Criminal Complaint filed by the Attorney General's Bureau of Consumer of Protection, Surgeon sold investors a limited number of common stock shares in Americana Corporation, a company that was purported to be a leisure equipment and spa distribution company. Surgeon allegedly falsely informed potential investors that he would personally buy back their shares of common stock for three times the purchase price within one year of the purchase date. The Criminal Complaint alleges the Defendant committed securities fraud by misrepresenting to investors that their investments in Americana Corporation were risk free and guaranteed. In addition, it is alleged that Surgeon failed to disclose to investors that the Vice President of Operations for Americana Corporation had previously been indicted in U.S. District Court for Conspiracy, Wire Fraud, and Aiding and Abetting. In convicted, Surgeon faces up to 35 years in state prison and a fine. He would also be ordered to pay restitution to the investors. A Criminal Complaint is merely an accusation. The Defendant should be presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty in a court of law. If you believe you have been have been a victim of Securities fraud, call the Nevada Securities Division in Las Vegas at (702) 486-2440, or in Reno at (775) 688-1855. Consumer protection information is always available on the Attorney General's Web site. STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Protecting Citizens, Solving Problems, Making Government Work FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 31, 2000 CONTACT: Victoria Oldenburg (775) 684-1100 ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE WILL CONDUCT STATEWIDE PRESENTATIONS ON NEVADA OPEN MEETING LAW Carson City---Attorney General Frankie Sue Del Papa announced today that her office will be conducting presentations across the state on Nevada's Open Meeting Law. The presentations will focus on how elected and appointed public officials are required to comply with the letter, spirit and intent of Nevada Open Meeting Law. The first presentation will take place in Las Vegas on February 3rd (from 1:00-4:0pm) and 4th (9:00am- 12:00pm), at the Grant Sawyer Building, located at 555 E. Washington Avenue. The presentation is free. Anyone interested in attending the presentation must pre-register with the Attorney General's office by calling (775) 684-1221. In addition to hearing an informative presentation on the subject, attendees will receive a newly created brochure outlining the Nevada Open Meeting Law, the Open Meeting Law Compliance Checklist, and the Nevada Open Meeting Law Manual. These publications will soon be available on the Attorney General's Web site at: http://ag.state.nv.us/. Open Meeting Law presentations will be conducted throughout the state during 2000. Forthcoming announcements will be made when a presentation will be taking place in a specific community. "Compliance with the Open Meeting Law is critical to open government," Del Papa said. "Through these presentations, we hope to better educate public officials on the fine points of the law, thereby reducing, if not eliminating, violations of the Nevada Open Meeting Law." The Nevada Open Meeting Law is considered one of the most stringent open meeting laws in the United States. When it was first enacted in 1960, it consisted of only four sections. It has since been amended sixteen times, and presently consists of eleven sections. Over the years, there have been eleven significant decisions by the Nevada Supreme Court or federal courts interpreting and applying the law. Two significant decisions are forthcoming from the Nevada Supreme Court. The Nevada Attorney General's office, which has jurisdiction to enforce the Nevada Open Meeting Law, has also issued several interpretive opinions regarding the statute. For more information on the presentations, or to pre-register for the Las Vegas presentation, please call Linda Deming (775) 684-1221. NOTE: Attorneys who attend one of the Nevada Open Meeting Law presentations may be eligible for CLE credit. STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Protecting Citizens, Solving Problems, Making Government Work FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 27, 2000 CONTACT: Grenville Pridham (702) 486-3788 TWO MEN SENTENCED FOR CRIMES COMMITTED WHILE TELEMARKETING Las Vegas - Attorney General Frankie Sue Del Papa announced that two men, who drove into two police officers while attempting to avoid arrest, were today sentenced by Clark County District Court Judge Kathy A. Hardcastle. John L. Campe, age 46, of Las Vegas, and Terry L. Ford, age 48, from Ukiah, California, were trying to evade officers who confronted them in the parking lot of a Las Vegas Supermarket because of their participation in a fraudulent telemarketing scheme. Campe was given five years probation with an underlying sentence of a maximum term of thirty-four (34) months in the Nevada State Prison. As a condition of probation, Campe must serve 120 days in the Clark County Detention Center; pay $2,450 in restitution and a $5,000 fine. Ford was also given probation with an underlying term of one year in the Clark County Detention Center for his role in the telemarketing scheme and subsequent vehicle pursuit. As a condition of his probation, Ford was ordered to spend 90 days on house arrest and pay a fine in the amount of $2,000. Campe pled guilty to a felony Resisting Public Officer with a Deadly Weapon, the vehicle. Ford pled guilty to a Gross Misdemeanor Offense of Conspiracy to Commit Battery with the Use of a Deadly Weapon, the vehicle. Their pleas arose out of their involvement in a fraudulent telemarketing scheme that defrauded elderly victims in October, 1996. On October 17, 1996, Campe drove Ford to a Lucky's Grocery Store at Bonanza Ave. and Lamb Blvd. Campe had recruited Ford to make phone calls to elderly victims, telling them they had won a sweepstakes. Ford would then tell the victim they needed to first send several thousand dollars to a woman in Las Vegas before collecting the prize money. Campe had also recruited a woman to collect the money from a Western Union office located in the Lucky's. The defendants then sent the woman into the store to collect a wire transfer from an elderly victim who had been targeted by Campe and Ford. After the woman was unsuccessful in collecting the money, she went out to a vehicle where Campe and Ford were waiting for her. When the investigators determined who the woman was meeting, they approached the defendants. When the agents identified themselves as police officers, Campe quickly accelerated, driving his Suzuki Sidekick automobile into two members of the Telemarketing Task Force, dragging one and knocking him down to the pavement. Campe then led officers on a high-speed chase east on Bonanza Road, speeding through school zones and running a red light at Nellis Ave. During the chase, the defendants threw large amounts of paper out of the car, which were subsequently retrieved and determined to be evidence of illegal telemarketing. Campe did not pull his vehicle over until he realized that Bonanza Road was going to stop and his car could not climb the mountain terrain. The convictions in this case are part of the Attorney General's ongoing effort to stop fraudulent telemarketers in the State of Nevada. The joint investigation was conducted by the Southern Nevada Telemarketing Task Force, which is comprised of the Office of the Nevada Attorney General, U.S. Attorney's Office, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the United States Postal Inspectors. "Someone should never send money to a telephone salesperson who claims you have won a prize, but tells you must first send money to cover shipping, taxes, or any other kind fee before you can collect your prize," Del Papa said. "You should immediately report the call to the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the Nevada Attorney General's Bureau of Consumer Protection. Legitimate businesses do not require up-front payments when a person has won a legitimate contest." For further information on this and other consumer matters, contact the Bureau of Consumer Protection Division at (702) 486-3786, or contact the Attorney General's office statewide by calling Nevada's toll free switchboard at 1-800-992-0900. Consumer protection information can be found on the Attorney General's Web site at: http://ag.state.nv.us/ STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Protecting Citizens, Solving Problems, Making Government Work FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 26, 2000 CONTACT: Leslie Nielsen (702) 486-3102 LAS VEGAS UNLICENSED REAL ESTATE APPRAISER ARRESTED Las Vegas---Joseph Saint Clair, age 53, of Las Vegas, was arrested today by investigators from the Attorney General's office on gross misdemeanor charges that he has continued to act as a real estate appraiser despite revocation of his license in July of 1999 by the Commission of Appraisers of Real Estate for unethical conduct and incompetence. In addition to the criminal charges, which have been referred to the Clark County District Attorney's office, the Attorney General's office filed a civil lawsuit late last week, on behalf of the Real Estate Division of the Department of Business and Industry, seeking an injunction to prohibit Saint Clair from further acting as a real estate appraiser.
Recommended publications
  • AG Alliance 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting Final Agenda * All Times EDT

    AG Alliance 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting Final Agenda * All Times EDT

    AG Alliance 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting Final Agenda * All times EDT THURSDAY 7/16: 11:30am – 2:30pm EDT (2 panels) • 11:30am – 12:30pm EDT: COVID-19 Impacts and Adaptations by Innovators and Industry, Consumer Warnings and State Government Oversight Roles (60 min) Moderator: Ellen Rosenblum, Attorney General, Oregon Attorney General’s Office o Lev Kubiak, Vice President and Deputy Chief Security Officer, Pfizer o Haley Schaffer, Senior Legal Counsel, 3M o Speaker TBD, Lowe’s Summary: Price gouging laws typically apply to prices of essential items needed in an emergency. Price gouging occurs when a seller increases the price of goods, services or commodities to a level much higher than is considered reasonable or fair. Hear how Attorneys General and industry continue working together to identify and stop this practice during the pandemic. The internet has driven a dramatic increase in the expansion of the counterfeit drug market. Learn about the low- risk/high-reward nature of this criminal industry, and how regulators are stepping up to combat it. • 1pm-2:30pm EDT: COVID-19 Price Gouging Issues (90 min) Moderator: William Tong, Attorney General, Connecticut o Clayton Friedman, Partner, Crowell & Moring LLP o Paul Singer, Senior Counsel for Public Protection, Texas AGO o Victoria Butler, Director, Consumer Protection Division, Florida AGO o Nicholas Trutanich, US Attorney, District of Nevada Summary: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, Attorneys General have been on the watch for price gouging. As a result, several large companies have become subject to Attorney General investigations, and others have been named defendants in class action lawsuits brought by unhappy consumers.
  • 173-14: Annual Report FY 2014, 7/1/2013 to June 30/2014

    173-14: Annual Report FY 2014, 7/1/2013 to June 30/2014

    173-14 Annual Report Fiscal Year 2014 July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014 State of Nevada Office of State Treasurer Kate Marshall OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER September 28, 2014 Dear Gov. Sandoval and Members of the Legislature: As required by NRS 226.120, it is my pleasure to present you with the State Treasurer’s Office Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2014 (FY14). As we began the process of updating what will be my final Annual Report as State Treasurer, I couldn’t help but think about what we have accomplished during my eight years in office. I am extremely proud of the many programs we have instituted that are and will continue to make a significant difference in the lives of Nevadans, as well as the vast improvements we have incorporated that save taxpayer dollars while at the same time increasing efficiency. When I was first elected to office in 2006, I ran on a platform I called the “Marshall Plan,” which included seven main points. The basic tenets were simple: improve and implement programs that would save taxpayer dollars; reduce spending by becoming more efficient; and identify innovative methods for increasing economic development in our state. It gives me a deep sense of satisfaction that with the help of my staff and many partners, we have been able to fulfill the basic tenets I laid out nearly eight years ago. As administrator of the Nevada College Savings Plans, I am enormously satisfied to report that during my term, the number of Nevadans saving for college through the establishment of 529 accounts has risen by 52%.
  • News Release

    News Release

    Attorney General Doug Peterson News Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 5, 2019 Attorney General Peterson Urges Congress to Take Action Against Robocalls Lincoln – Today, Attorney General Peterson urged the U.S. Senate to enact the Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence (TRACED) Act, legislation to curb illegal robocalls and spoofing. A coalition of 51 attorneys general, led by Nebraska Attorney General Doug Peterson, North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein, New Hampshire Attorney General Gordon J. MacDonald, and Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, sent a letter to the U. S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation supporting the TRACED Act. The legislation is sponsored by Sens. John Thune and Ed Markey. Attorney General Peterson said, “State attorneys general are on the front lines of helping consumers who are harassed and scammed by unwanted calls. For years, we have worked with both our federal counterparts and industry participants to encourage the adoption of technological solutions in the fight against these calls. I am proud to support this legislation.” In their letter, the attorneys general state that the TRACED Act enables states, federal regulators, and telecom providers to take steps to combat these illegal calls. The legislation will require voice service providers to participate in a call authentication framework to help block unwanted calls and creates an interagency working group to take additional actions to reduce robocalls and hold telemarketers and robocallers accountable. More than 48 billion robocalls were made in 2018, making them the number one source of consumer complaints to the FTC and the FCC and resulting in millions in consumer losses.
  • The Common Law Powers of the Nevada Attorney General: Ryan V

    The Common Law Powers of the Nevada Attorney General: Ryan V

    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NVJ\14-3\NVJ315.txt unknown Seq: 1 21-MAY-14 10:00 THE COMMON LAW POWERS OF THE NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL: RYAN V. EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT Robert Stewart* The office of the attorney general derived from thirteenth-century England and voyaged with the American settlers across the Atlantic, ultimately taking root in each of the thirteen original colonies.1 There, the colonial attorneys general took on a wide variety of duties,2 many of which originated from the common law, such as being “intrusted with the management of all legal affairs and the prosecution of all suits, civil and criminal, in which the crown was interested.”3 Time passed, the nation expanded, and now every state wields an attorney general.4 The majority of states uphold their attorneys general’s com- mon law powers5—while simultaneously authorizing legislatures to withdraw * Juris Doctorate Candidate, May 2014, William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Articles Editor, Nevada Law Journal Volume 14. 1 See William P. Marshall, Break Up the Presidency? Governors, State Attorneys General, and Lessons from the Divided Executive, 115 YALE L.J. 2446, 2449–50 (2006). 2 For example, in 1708, the duties of the South Carolina Attorney General were specified as follows: [T]o Act, Plead, Implead, Sue and Prosecute all and every Person & Persons whatsoever, for all Debts, Fines, Amerciaments, Forfeitures, Escheats Claims and Demands whatsoever which now is or may or Shall be Due and in Arrears to Us upon any Account whatsoever whither Rents, Revenues or otherwise howsoever, And to Prosecute all Matters Criminall as well as Civill Giv- ing and hereby Granting unto You full Power and authority and the Premises therein to Deal Doe Execute and Performe in as large and Ample manner to all Intents and Purposes as to the Said office of Attorney Generall doth in any way Appertaine & bellong .
  • HOUSE COMMITTEES 2019 - 2020 Legislative Session

    HOUSE COMMITTEES 2019 - 2020 Legislative Session

    HOUSE COMMITTEES 2019 - 2020 Legislative Session Agriculture & Forestry Education Health Care Rep. Carolyn W. Partridge, Chair Rep. Kathryn Webb, Chair Rep. William J. Lippert Jr., Chair Rep. Rodney Graham, Vice Chair Rep. Lawrence Cupoli, Vice Chair Rep. Anne B. Donahue, Vice Chair Rep. John L. Bartholomew, Ranking Mbr Rep. Peter Conlon, Ranking Member Rep. Lori Houghton, Ranking Member Rep. Thomas Bock Rep. Sarita Austin Rep. Annmarie Christensen Rep. Charen Fegard Rep. Lynn Batchelor Rep. Brian Cina Rep. Terry Norris Rep. Caleb Elder Rep. Mari Cordes Rep. John O'Brien Rep. Dylan Giambatista Rep. David Durfee Rep. Vicki Strong Rep. Kathleen James Rep. Benjamin Jickling Rep. Philip Jay Hooper Rep. Woodman Page Appropriations Rep. Christopher Mattos Rep. Lucy Rogers Rep. Catherine Toll, Chair Rep. Casey Toof Rep. Brian Smith Rep. Mary S. Hooper, Vice Chair Rep. Peter J. Fagan, Ranking Member Energy & Technology Human Services Rep. Charles Conquest Rep. Timothy Briglin, Chair Rep. Ann Pugh, Chair Rep. Martha Feltus Rep. Laura Sibilia, Vice Chair Rep. Sandy Haas, Vice Chair Rep. Robert Helm Rep. Robin Chesnut-Tangerman, Rep. Francis McFaun, Ranking Member Rep. Diane Lanpher Ranking Member Rep. Jessica Brumsted Rep. Linda K. Myers Rep. R. Scott Campbell Rep. James Gregoire Rep. Maida Townsend Rep. Seth Chase Rep. Logan Nicoll Rep. Matthew Trieber Rep. Mark Higley Rep. Daniel Noyes Rep. David Yacovone Rep. Avram Patt Rep. Kelly Pajala Rep. Heidi E. Scheuermann Rep. Marybeth Redmond Commerce & Rep. Michael Yantachka Rep. Carl Rosenquist Rep. Theresa Wood Economic Development General, Housing, & Military Affairs Rep. Michael Marcotte, Chair Judiciary Rep. Thomas Stevens, Chair Rep. Jean O'Sullivan, Vice Chair Rep.
  • June 18, 2021 Honorable Merrick B. Garland Attorney General of The

    June 18, 2021 Honorable Merrick B. Garland Attorney General of The

    DANA NESSEL MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL June 18, 2021 Honorable Merrick B. Garland Attorney General of the United States U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Lisa O. Monaco Deputy Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Department of Justice’s interpretation of Wire Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1084 Dear Attorney General Garland and Deputy Attorney General Monaco: We, the undersigned State Attorneys General, are seeking clarity and finality from the Department of Justice regarding its interpretation of the Wire Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1084. As you may be aware, 25 State Attorneys General wrote to your predecessors on March 21, 2019 to express our strong objection to the Office of Legal Counsel’s (OLC’s) Opinion “Reconsidering Whether the Wire Act Applies to Non- Sports Gambling,” which reversed the Department’s seven-year-old position that the Wire Act applied only to sports betting. Many States relied on that former position to allow online gaming to proceed. Since that letter, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld a challenge to the new OLC Opinion, holding that the Wire Act applies only to sports betting. After the First Circuit decision, it is vital that States get clarity on the Department’s position going forward. States and industry participants need to understand what their rights are under the law without having to file suit in every federal circuit, and finality is needed so the industry may confidently invest in new products and features without fear of criminal prosecution.
  • Current House Journal

    Current House Journal

    Journal of the House of the STATE OF VERMONT BIENNIAL SESSION, 2021 ________________ Wednesday, January 6, 2021 Pursuant to the provisions of the Constitution and Laws of the State of Vermont, the members-elect of the House of Representatives convened in the State House in Montpelier on the first Wednesday after the first Monday, being the sixth day of January, in the year of our Lord, two thousand and twenty-one. At ten o’clock in the forenoon, the Honorable James C. Condos, Secretary of State, called the House to order for the seventy-sixth biennial session. Devotional Exercises Devotional exercises were conducted by The Rt. Rev. Dr. Shannon McVean-Brown, Episcopal Bishop of Vermont, Burlington. Pledge of Allegiance Secretary of State James C. Condos, led the House in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Secretary of State, James C. Condos, called the roll for the seventy-sixth biennial session: Addison-1 Robin Scheu Addison-1 Amy D. Sheldon Addison-2 Peter Conlon Addison-3 Matthew Birong Addison-3 Diane M. Lanpher Addison-4 Mari Cordes Addison-4 Caleb Elder 1 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 2 Addison-5 Harvey T. Smith Addison-Rutland Terry E. Norris Bennington-1 Nelson Brownell Bennington-2-1 Timothy R. Corcoran II Bennington-2-1 Dane Whitman Bennington-2-2 Mary A. Morrissey Bennington-2-2 Michael Nigro Bennington-3 David K. Durfee Bennington-4 Seth Bongartz Bennington-4 Kathleen James Bennington-Rutland Linda Joy Sullivan Caledonia-1 Marcia Robinson Martel Caledonia-2 Joseph “Chip” J. Troiano Caledonia-3 Scott L. Beck Caledonia-3 R.
  • Letters to the U.S. House and U.S. Senate

    Letters to the U.S. House and U.S. Senate

    April 29, 2021 Senator Patrick Leahy Senator Richard Shelby Chair Ranking Member U.S. Senate Committee U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations on Appropriations 437 Russell Building 304 Russell Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Senator Jeanne Shaheen Senator Jerry Moran Chair Ranking Member U.S. Senate Committee on U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations Appropriations Subcommittee on Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, Commerce, Justice, Science, & Related Agencies & Related Agencies 506 Hart Building 521 Dirksen Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Re: State Attorneys General Support the Legal Services Corporation Dear Chair DeLauro, Ranking Member Granger, Chair Cartwright, and Ranking Member Aderholt, As state attorneys general, we respectfully request that you consider robust funding for the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) in the Fiscal Year 2022 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations bill. Since 1974, LSC funding has provided vital and diverse legal assistance to low-income Americans including victims of natural disasters, survivors of domestic violence, families facing foreclosure, and veterans accessing earned benefits. Today, LSC also provides essential support for struggling families affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. As the single largest funder of civil legal aid in the United States, LSC-funded programs touch every corner of our country with more than 800 offices and a presence in every congressional district. LSC funding has also fostered public-private partnerships between legal aid organizations and private firms and attorneys across the country which donate their time and skills to assist residents in need. Nationwide, 132 independent nonprofit legal aid programs rely on this federal funding to provide services to nearly two million of our constituents on an annual basis.
  • Bi-State Primary Care Association, January 2020

    Bi-State Primary Care Association, January 2020

    Vermont 2020January 2020 Primary Care Sourcebook Bi-State Primary Care Association 61 Elm Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05602 (802) 229-0002 www.bistatepca.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to Bi-State Page 3 Overcoming Transpiration Barriers Page 18 Bi-State PCA Vermont Members Page 4 Helping Patients Experiencing Homelessness Page 19 Key Elements of Bi-State’s Work Page 5 Accessing Nutritious Food Page 19 FQHC’s, AHEC, PPNNE, and VCCU Page 7 Reducing Isolation for Farmworkers Page 20 Member Map Page 8 Other Elements of Comprehensive Care Page 21 Payer Mix Page 9 Vermont Rural Health Alliance (VRHA) Page 24 Bi-States 2019-2020 Vermont Public Policy 1 in 3 Vermonters in over 88 Sites Page 10 Page 27 Principles Investing in Primary Care Page 11 FQHC Funding Page 28 Workforce Development Supports Primary Care Page 13 FQHC and ACO Participation Page 28 Bi-State Workforce Recruitment Center Page 14 FQHC Federal Requirements Page 29 Workforce & Area Health Education Centers (AHEC) Page 15 Member Sites by Organization Page 30 Addressing All the Factors of Wellness Page 17 Member Sites by County Page 31 Legislative Representation List Biennium 2019 – Tracking Social Determinants of Health Page 18 Page 33 2020 2 What is a Primary Care Association? Each of the 50 states (or in Bi-State’s case, a pair of states) has one nonprofit Primary Care Association (PCA) to serve as the voice for Community Health Centers. These health centers were born out of the civil rights and social justice movements of the 1960’s with a clear mission that prevails today: to provide health care to communities with a scarcity of providers and services.
  • Attorney General/1997 News Release

    Attorney General/1997 News Release

    STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Protecting Citizens, Solving Problems, Making Government Work June 25, 1997 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Bob Harmon (702) 687-3512 DEL PAPA CALLS SUPREME COURT RULING VICTORY FOR NEVADA'S PRISONS Attorney General Frankie Sue Del Papa said she is extremely pleased with this morning's United States Supreme Court ruling on the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). "I feel this ruling is a victory in the battle which Senator Reid and I have fought for more than five years due to the statute's adverse impact on our prison system," Del Papa said. "Since RFRA was passed by Congress in 1993, our prison systems have been inundated with often unreasonable, frivolous demands and lawsuits from inmates who claim they are entitled to special privileges for religious purposes." The Court's ruling in support of the Petitioners in City of Boerne v. Texas, finds that RFRA is far too sweeping in its requirements. RFRA, as it was enacted by Congress, allowed virtually any law to be subject to challenge by any person at any time who claimed an entitlement to special treatment on religious grounds. As a result state prisons could be improperly compelled to accede to unreasonable requests from inmates. By a 6-3 vote, the Court concluded that RFRA exceeded Congress' power under Section 5 of the 14th amendment. Attorney General Del Papa and Sen. Harry Reid are recognized as leaders in the nationwide effort to exempt prison inmates from the requirements of RFRA. "In our own prison system inmates have demanded the state provide them with such items as hate literature, pornographic materials and the right to hold secret group ceremonies.
  • 1 in the Circuit Court of The

    1 in the Circuit Court of The

    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Court Case Number: ) UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) FINAL JUDGMENT AND CONSENT DECREE Plaintiff Office of Attorney General, State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs, by Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as the “State of Florida”) has filed a Complaint for a permanent injunction and other relief in this matter pursuant to the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Chapter 501, Part II, Florida Statutes (2018) (“FDUTPA”) and the Florida Information Protection Act, Section 501.171, Florida Statutes (2018) (“FIPA”), alleging Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (“UBER”) committed violations of FDUTPA and FIPA. Plaintiff and UBER have agreed to the Court’s entry of this Final Judgment and Consent Decree without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and without admission of any facts alleged or liability of any kind. Preamble The Attorneys General of the states and commonwealths of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, 1 Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii1, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland2, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah3, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, and the District of Columbia (collectively, the “Attorneys General,” or the “States”) conducted an investigation under their respective State Consumer Protection Acts and Personal Information Protection Acts4 regarding the data breach involving UBER that occurred in 2016 and that UBER announced in 2017.
  • Journal of the House ______Wednesday, May 22, 2019 at Ten O'clock in the Forenoon the Speaker Called the House to Order

    Journal of the House ______Wednesday, May 22, 2019 at Ten O'clock in the Forenoon the Speaker Called the House to Order

    Journal of the House ________________ Wednesday, May 22, 2019 At ten o'clock in the forenoon the Speaker called the House to order. Devotional Exercises Devotional exercises were conducted by Rep. Curt Taylor of Colchester. Pledge of Allegiance The Speaker led the House in the Pledge of Allegiance. Message from the Senate No. 64 A message was received from the Senate by Mr. Marshall, its Assistant Secretary, as follows: Madam Speaker: I am directed to inform the House that: The Senate has considered House proposal of amendment to Senate bill of the following title: S. 96. An act relating to the provision of water quality services. And has concurred therein with an amendment in the passage of which the concurrence of the House is requested. The Senate has considered a bill originating in the House of the following title: H. 547. An act relating to approval of an amendment to the charter of the City of Montpelier. And has passed the same in concurrence. The Senate has considered House proposals of amendment to Senate bills of the following titles: S. 30. An act relating to the regulation of hydrofluorocarbons. S. 31. An act relating to informed health care financial decision making. S. 37. An act relating to medical monitoring. S. 105. An act relating to miscellaneous judiciary procedures. And has concurred therein. 1817 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 1818 The Senate has considered the report of the Committee of Conference upon the disagreeing votes of the two Houses upon Senate bill of the following title: S. 95. An act relating to municipal utility capital investment.