Module AR3037 Britain in the Roman Empire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Module AR3037 Britain in the Roman Empire School of Archaeology & Ancient History Module AR3037 Britain in the Roman Empire Academic Year: 2009–10 Semester: 2 Time and location: Fri 10.00-12.00, Attenboro 206 Module coordinator: Professor David Mattingly e-mail: [email protected] Room: 021 Office hours: Mon 9-11 am document prepared by: David Mattingly 21.12.09 1 2 AR3037 Britain in the Roman Empire Module details Weighting: 20 credits Coordinator: David Mattingly Other tutors: Module outline: This module offers a detailed study of Roman provincial culture. The underlying theme of the course is the diversity of experience of life under Roman rule and case-studies will be drawn from all regions of Britain and from different levels in the social hierarchy. The study of Roman Britain is undergoing profound change at present as old assumptions are called into question and new more theoretical approaches are pioneered. This will be a course more about the experience of life under Roman rule than a straightforward historical narrative. It will also take a critical view of the nature of society in different parts of Britain and beyond the frontiers and assess how different groups of people were affected by contact with the empire. Aims: To build on the chronological and thematic awareness gained in AR 2033 To provide students with an advanced understanding of the culture of Roman Britain in the context of the archaeology and history of the Roman Empire To enable students to find independently new published evidence for subjects within Roman archaeology To further enhance critical skills in assessing both primary evidence and modern theories through group work and discussions Learning On completion of this module, students will be able to: outcomes: Demonstrate factual knowledge of the archaeology of Roman Britain Critically evaluate the evidence in a broader theoretical context Write concise summaries of scholarly works Undertake a piece of individual research and present the results in an oral presentation Method of One examination (Seen Paper), 2 hours (50% of mark) assessment One essay max. 3,000 words (40% of mark) One seminar presentation (10% of mark) 3 Teaching schedule Week 1 29/1/10 Roman Imperialism and the Historiography of Roman Britain Sources Pre-Roman Britain Week 2 5/2/10 The Military Community I: Conquest and garrisoning Week 3 12/2/10 The Military Community II: identity and culture Week 4 19/2/10 The Urban Community I: The Urban Experiment Week 5 26/2/10 The Urban Community II: identity and culture Week 6 5/3/10 No lecture Reading week Week 7 12/3/10 The Rural Communities I: Changing Landscapes of Britain Week 8 19/2/10 The Rural Communities II: identity and culture Week 9 Thur 25/3/10 Reconstructing Roman Leicester: seminar presentations Week 10 7/5/10 Different Economies and discrepant identities Final Review and exam preparation Note the different day for the seminar presentations. We shall also need to arrange an excursion early in term to De Montfort University to view a new computer model of Roman Leicester, which links with the seminar theme. 4 Assignments and deadlines Essay Assessment and deadlines: Regionalism in Roman Britain Each student will take a region of Britain (to be communicated to me for approval by e-mail – so as to avoid too many of you choosing the same area and chasing the same books). As an example of what I mean by a region, I would take a block of territory equivalent to 2 or more modern counties – the East Midlands, or South-western counties, or South Wales, etc.). The main theme of the essay should be either military deployment or rural settlement. The essay should be in two parts: first, write a brief synopsis of the region’s [military or rural] history from the first century BC to early fifth century AD. The second part should provide an analytical commentary on this picture, focussed on what the archaeology reveals about the relationship of the indigenous population with the Roman empire. I expect to see some commentary also on the extent to which your selected region shows conformity/non-conformity with other parts of Britain under Roman rule (and where you detect variability some discussion of why this may have been so). The key underlying question is how far it is safe to make broad generalisations about military garrison patterns (and functions) or rural settlement for Britain as a whole or whether these things need to be analysed at the regional level. For bibliography, use the full bibliography on the Blackboard site and your own library skills! Essay length: 3000 words maximum Essay deadline: Tue 9 March 2010 Seminar Assignments (to be presented in class on Thursday 25 March – session to be specially arranged) NB The seminar presentations class will need to be arranged on the Thursday of the last week of the Spring term and will require a 3 hour slot. All the seminar presentations will focus on issues of reconstructing Roman Britain. The assignments are linked to the Virtual Roman Leicester project being conducted between De Montfort University (DMU) and the University of Leicester. This involves creating a highly detailed computer model of the cityscape of Leicester in the Roman period, which will then be populated by avatars with distinct identities, representing different groups and strata in society. There are currently problems with the computer reconstructions of buildings (DMU have raced ahead to get a first version of the environment up and running). The class will visit the DMU lab for a demonstration of the existing model and will then undertake research to suggest improved ideas for the reconstruction of individual buildings and decorative elements. What I am looking for in the presentations is as follows: a) a critique of the existing state of the model/reconstruction at DMU b) a comparison with other reconstruction drawings of this type of building in Britain (parallels with other parts of the Roman empire can also be considered, but you need to show awareness that Britain was not necessarily the same as Italy!) c) propositions concerning scale, materials and finish of the building/decorative media in Leicester Each member of the class will be assigned a specific building type or decorative medium, drawing on the detailed bibliography below and on individual bibliographic research. These topics must be agreed with me well in advance, with only one person allowed to do each topic. Presentations will be short (c.5 minutes each), but will be expected to be well presented, with accompanying visual aids and handouts. I will be available for consultation regarding both content and presentation style. The following are suggested topics: Reconstructions of specific building types in Romano-British context Forum and basilica complexes Public baths Small baths Urban Defences and Gates Theatres Amphitheatres Markets Aqueducts and wells 5 Elite house (2nd century) Elite house (4th century) Shops and workshops Classical temples and precincts Romano-Celtic temples and precincts Mithraea Cemetery areas and funerary rites (1st-2nd centuries) Cemetery areas and funerary rites (3rd-4th centuries) Streets (widths, paving, drains, sewers, etc.) Half-timbered buildings and timber buildings Round houses Architectural elements and internal decoration Columns and Classical orders Mosaics Wall-paintings Roofing materials and chimneys Sculpture Furniture You are welcome to suggest your own ideas for broad themes or (better) focused sub-topics within these general areas. Bibliography for reconstructing Roman Britain Many general books on Roman Britain contain images offering reconstruction views of individual buildings and cityscapes. The following may also be useful starting points: De la Bedoyere, G. 1992. The Towns of Roman Britain. Batsford, London. De la Bedoyere, G. 1991. The Buildings of Roman Britain. Batsford, London. Drury, P.J. 1982. Structural Reconstruction. Oxford. Johnson, P. and Haynes, I. 1996. Architecture in Roman Britain. London. Sorrell, A. 1976. Roman Towns in Britain. London BLACKBOARD Some course resources and materials have been mounted on Blackboard and it is hoped to develop other aspects of the Blackboard VLE as the semester progresses. Please be aware that Blackboard development is still comparatively young at Leicester. Your comments and suggestions are welcome! 6 Reading list A good deal of reading will be required of you in taking this course. The course is built around the structure of my book An Imperial Possession Britain in the Roman Empire (2006) and I recommend that you try to keep up with the relevant chapters of that ahead of each lecture. We shall also be using James and Millett, Britons and Romans and P. Salway (ed.). Short Oxford History of the British Isles. The Roman era. There should be copies of these and a range of other recommended books covering parts of the course in the University Bookshop and I suggest you purchase at least one or two of those titles. The bibliography below is designed to provide a broad range of reading options for each lecture on the course, as well as some advice about general works and reference materials, useful for essays, seminar presentations and dissertations! An even fuller bibliography is provided in the WEB and BLACKBOARD versions of this course handbook – please consult the fuller resource. NOTE: this bibliography is intended to help you to find publications on a wide range of topics. You are not expected (and you cannot possibly) look at all of them. It is a directory and a not a list of what you should read. But you will be expected to do some additional reading each week on the topic of that week’s class. INTRODUCTORY AND KEY BACKGROUND Key reading: Imperial Possession, pp 3-84. General studies and important syntheses Creighton, J.
Recommended publications
  • Roman Lead Sealings
    Roman Lead Sealings VOLUME I MICHAEL CHARLES WILLIAM STILL SUBMITTED FOR TIlE DEGREE OF PILD. SEPTEMBER 1995 UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY (L n") '3 1. ABSTRACT This thesis is based on a catalogue of c. 1800 records, covering over 2000 examples of Roman lead sealings, many previously unpublished. The catalogue is provided with indices of inscriptions and of anepigraphic designs, and subsidiary indices of places, military units, private individuals and emperors mentioned on the scalings. The main part of the thesis commences with a history of the use of lead sealings outside of the Roman period, which is followed by a new typology (the first since c.1900) which puts special emphasis on the use of form as a guide to dating. The next group of chapters examine the evidence for use of the different categories of scalings, i.e. Imperial, Official, Taxation, Provincial, Civic, Military and Miscellaneous. This includes evidence from impressions, form, texture of reverse, association with findspot and any literary references which may help. The next chapter compares distances travelled by similar scalings and looks at the widespread distribution of identical scalings of which the origin is unknown. The first statistical chapter covers imperial sealings. These can be assigned to certain periods and can thus be subjected to the type of analysis usually reserved for coins. The second statistical chapter looks at the division of categories of scalings within each province. The scalings in each category within each province are calculated as percentages of the provincial total and are then compared with an adjusted percentage for that category in the whole of the empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of Volume 2
    Contents of Volume 2 Introduction 1 I Adiutrix 3 I Italica 14 I Minervia 24 Adiutrix 38 II Augusta 52 II Italica 68 In Italica 72 BIT Flavia 77 IV Macedonica 87 V Alaudae 92 V Macedonica 95 VI Victrix 109 VII Claudia 124 VIII Augusta 137 VIIII Hispana 147 X Gemina 153 XI Claudia 169 XIII Gemina 187 XIV Getnina 199 XV Apollinaris 216 XV Primigenia 228 XX Valeria Victrix 231 XXI Rap ax 247 XXII Primigenia 251 XXX Ulpia Victrix 271 Bibliography 276 2 1 MAR 1991 Introduction to Legionary Lists The following section lists the attested centurions of twenty four legions. In each list there is an account of each attested centurion which concentrates on the date and the context of the inscription. Multiple centurionate careers are cross-referenced into the relevant chapters of Volume one. At the end of each chronological list there is a chronologically ordered spread-sheet giving name, reference, date, origin, findspot and any further noteworthy information. At the end of the chronologically ordered spread-sheet there is an alphabetically ordered spread-sheet giving the same information. Centurions named on lead seals and graffiti- are only mentioned if the name is confirmed on a stone inscription from another place. I hope in the future to produce a complete list of centurions from sources other than stone. The legions omitted from the lists are those from the Greek speaking area of the Empire, plus III Augusta and VII Gemina which have both had lists of their centurions published in recent years. Again, I hope to produce a complete list of legionary centurions in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome, Inc. Campaign Game Replay 27 BCE Scenario
    Rome, Inc. Campaign Game Replay Caesar. Quiet turn, relatively speaking. Only one Barbarian leader arrives and with no matching War just sits in his With the rules for Rome, Inc. pretty much complete, I figured homeland. Money is low, so I don’t purchase new units, and I’d do a replay of the four-scenario campaign game. The keep my legions and Auxilia in place to put down empire starts out with Augustus as Caesar, and his friend insurgencies. I pick up Paulinus, who has a high military Agrippa as Consul. Only one War is on the map, an 8/1 (8 ability of 4. Paulinus takes over Hispania, but he can only land strength, 1 naval strength) Cantabrian War in Hispania. muster a -1 advantage over the War that had kicked Numerous provinces across the empire are in insurgency Claudius’ ass, and I don’t want to risk a repeat (negative die status, but legions and auxilia are stacked up against some roll modifiers benefit the player). of them, using the stick approach to make the provinces Turn 3 (9-1 BCE) loyal. As the game moves along, more barbarian wars and leaders will appear along the frontier, and statesmen will More Inflation, leaving the Treasury with just 12 Gold, and show up, some welcome, others not. Let the games begin! Plague. Legions have two levels – ordinary legions with one shield icon on its counter, and veteran legions with two shield icons on their reverse. The Plague Event flips one veteran in each command to its ordinary side, halving their 27 BCE Scenario strength, though they can be promoted back to veteran later, usually in a Triumph.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMANS Knowledge Organiser
    Timeline Sticky Knowledge 800BC- Iron Age about 43AD the Romans 54BC Julius Caesar visits British shores Julius Caesar was probably the best 43AD Roman Invasion- beginning of Roman Britain known Roman leader. He extended the empire by 60-61 Boudiccan rebellion invading other lands. AD Boudicca was a queen of the 73 AD Romans conquer Wales British Celtic Iceni Tribe who led an uprising 112- Under the rule of Emperor Hadrian, work on Hadrian’s Wall against the occupying forc- 129 AD begins. In addition to being a military device it also served as a es of the Roman Empire. way to control trade across the border. It is a common miscon- This was the Roman name for London. A legend tells that Rome ception that the wall marks the Scottish border it lies, in fact, Londinium was created by totally within England two brothers, Romulus and conquer To overcome and take control of people or land using 216 AD In order to better control Britain, the Romans divided the coun- military force. Remus who were aban- try in two. The South became know as Britannia Superior and doned after they were born. conquer To overcome and take control of people or land using the North as Britannia Inferior. military force. Romans used to eat food like dormice dipped A commander of a group of 100 Roman soldiers. 306 AD Constantine ‘the Great’ is declared Emperor in York. Having centurion in honey. fought a civil war he believes his victory was aided by God and Romans occasionally used a emperor The Roman leader of the Roman Empire during spoon, but they would never in thanks, he becomes a Christian.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability and ‘The Fall of the Western Roman Empire’: Grain, Labor Markets, and Military Policies
    Sustainability and ‘The Fall of the Western Roman Empire’: Grain, Labor Markets, and Military Policies Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Graduate Program in Ancient Greek and Roman Studies Dr. Cheryl Walker, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Ancient Greek and Roman Studies by Hunter M. Bruno May 2018 Copyright by Hunter Bruno © 2018 ABSTRACT Sustainability and ‘The Fall of the Western Roman Empire’: Grain, Labor Markets, and Military Policies A thesis presented to the Graduate Program in Ancient Greek and Roman Studies Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By Hunter M. Bruno The issue of societal sustainability is relevant to both modern and ancient civilizations. Ancient Rome was defined and influenced by the issue of sustainability because it was integral to the fundamental structure of the Roman society. In the 5th Century CE, the fall of the Western Roman Empire took place because of consequences that resulted from the issue of sustainability. The societal factors of grain production, military policy, and labor markets all served to influence the sustainability of the Roman West. Roman military policy defined the nature of the Roman economy and established the type of labor system that it employed. Free and unfree labor markets structured the agrarian economy and formed the Roman system of internal taxation and rent collection. Local and commercial grain producers were relied upon to maintain the populations of the Roman West, uphold the Roman military, and sustain the growing servile populations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Britons in Late Antiquity: Power, Identity And
    THE BRITONS IN LATE ANTIQUITY: POWER, IDENTITY AND ETHNICITY EDWIN R. HUSTWIT Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Bangor University 2014 Summary This study focuses on the creation of both British ethnic or ‘national’ identity and Brittonic regional/dynastic identities in the Roman and early medieval periods. It is divided into two interrelated sections which deal with a broad range of textual and archaeological evidence. Its starting point is an examination of Roman views of the inhabitants of the island of Britain and how ethnographic images were created in order to define the population of Britain as 1 barbarians who required the civilising influence of imperial conquest. The discussion here seeks to elucidate, as far as possible, the extent to which the Britons were incorporated into the provincial framework and subsequently ordered and defined themselves as an imperial people. This first section culminates with discussion of Gildas’s De Excidio Britanniae. It seeks to illuminate how Gildas attempted to create a new identity for his contemporaries which, though to a certain extent based on the foundations of Roman-period Britishness, situated his gens uniquely amongst the peoples of late antique Europe as God’s familia. The second section of the thesis examines the creation of regional and dynastic identities and the emergence of kingship amongst the Britons in the late and immediately post-Roman periods. It is largely concerned to show how interaction with the Roman state played a key role in the creation of early kingships in northern and western Britain. The argument stresses that while there were claims of continuity in group identities in the late antique period, the socio-political units which emerged in the fifth and sixth centuries were new entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 8 Britannia Superior Compiled by A.S
    Map 8 Britannia Superior Compiled by A.S. Esmonde-Cleary, 1996 with the assistance of R. Warner (Ireland) Introduction Britain has a long tradition of antiquarian and archaeological investigation and recording of its Roman past, reaching back to figures such as Leland in the sixteenth century. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries the classically-educated aristocracy and gentry of a major imperial and military power naturally felt an affinity with the evidence for Rome’s presence in Britain. In the twentieth century, the development of archaeology as a discipline in its own right reinforced this interest in the Roman period, resulting in intense survey and excavation on Roman sites and commensurate work on artifacts and other remains. The cartographer is therefore spoiled for choice, and must determine the objectives of a map with care so as to know what to include and what to omit, and on what grounds. British archaeology already has a long tradition of systematization, sometimes based on regions as in the work of the Royal Commissions on (Ancient and) Historic Monuments for England (Scotland and Wales), but also on types of site or monument. Consequently, there are available compendia by Rivet (1979) on the ancient evidence for geography and toponymy; Wacher (1995) on the major towns; Burnham (1990) on the “small towns”; Margary (1973) on the roads that linked them; and Scott (1993) on villas. These works give a series of internally consistent catalogs of the major types of site. Maps of Roman Britain conventionally show the island with its modern coastline, but it is clear that there have been extensive changes since antiquity, and that the conventional approach risks understating the differences between the ancient and the modern.
    [Show full text]
  • Uvic Thesis Template
    The Transformation of Administrative Towns in Roman Britain by Lara Bishop BA, Saint Mary‟s University, 1997 MA, University of Wales Cardiff, 2001 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Greek and Roman Studies Lara Bishop, 2011 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee The Transformation of Administrative Towns in Roman Britain by Lara Bishop BA, Saint Mary‟s University, 1997 MA, University of Wales Cardiff, 2001 Supervisory Committee Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, (Department of Greek and Roman Studies) Supervisor Dr. J. Geoffrey Kron, (Department of Greek and Roman Studies) Departmental Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, (Department of Greek and Roman Studies) Supervisor Dr. J. Geoffrey Kron, (Department of Greek and Roman Studies) Departmental Member The purpose of this thesis is to determine whether the Roman administrative towns of Britain continued in their original Romanized form as seen in the second century AD, or were altered in their appearance and function in the fourth and fifth century, with a visible reduction in their urbanization and Romanization. It will be argued that British town life did change significantly. Major components of urbanization were disrupted with the public buildings disused or altered for other purposes, and the reduction or cessation of public services. A reduction in the population of the towns can be perceived in the eventual disuse of the extramural cemeteries and abandonment of substantial areas of settlement or possibly entire towns.
    [Show full text]
  • Provincia: Befehlsbereich Und Provinzgebiet 5 Die Benennungen
    VORWORT TEIL I: DIE LEITLINIEN DER ORDNUNG RÖMISCHER PROVINZEN: PRAGMATIK, EMPIRIE UND FLEXIBILITÄT PROVINCIA 5 Provincia: Befehlsbereich und Provinzgebiet 5 Die Benennungen von Provinzen 7 Provinzen mit Doppelnamen 8 - Erklärende Beinamen: superior, inferior, ulterior, Cisalpina, Transalpina, nova, salutaris 8 Publicae provinciae und kaiserliche Provinzen 10 KONSTITUIERUNG UND LEITUNG EINER PROVINZ 14 Einführung: Die Prinzipien der römischen Herrschaftsausübung 14 Die Provinzgründer 21 Einzelne Provinzgründer 21 - Grundsätzliche Aufgaben der Provinzgründer 41 Provinzstatut 44 DIE ADMINISTRATION EINER PROVINZ 48 Magistrate und Promagistrate als Statthalter 48 Die Statthalter der publicae provinciae (proconsules) 55 - Die Statthalter der kaiserlichen Provinzen (legati Augusti pro praetore) 59 - Das Kommando der kaiserlichen Statthalter über Legionen 64 - Die Dauer der Statthalterschaften in der Kaiserzeit 65 - Mit proprätorischer Amtsgewalt bestallte Legionslegaten 67 - Präsidialprokuratoren 68 - Praefectus provinciae und sonstige Präfekten (Subgou- verneure, praefectus civitatis, gentis, orae maritimae) 70 - Exkurs: procurator pro legato 75 - Praeses provinciae 77 - Der Verzicht auf eine Statthalterschaft 78 - Die Vertretung einer Statthalterschaft 81 - Von der personalen zur institutionalisierten Vertretung: Ritter als Verweser senatorischer Statthalterschaften 85 Besondere Imperien 87 Weitreichende Imperien zur Zeit der späten Republik 88 - Übergeordnete Imperien in der Kaiserzeit 93 Besondere Befugnisse von legati Augusti pro praetore
    [Show full text]
  • Healthiness, Through the Material Culture of Late Iron Age and Roman Large Urban-Type Settlements of South-East Britain
    HEALTHINESS, THROUGH THE MATERIAL CULTURE OF LATE IRON AGE AND ROMAN LARGE URBAN-TYPE SETTLEMENTS OF SOUTH-EAST BRITAIN TWO VOLUMES VOLUME 1 ANGELA LOUISE TURNER-WILSON A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Bournemouth University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Bournemouth University October 2009 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author, and due acknowledgement must always be made of the use of any material contained in, or derived from, this thesis. 2 ABSTRACT It has recently been recognised that concepts of health contain multiple dimensions. One area that has received little attention in archaeology is that of health and well-being, so this research seeks to contribute to this area of study. It does so by investigating healthiness in the late Iron Age and Romano-British periods. The literature review explores current thinking around this topic, and confirms that aspects of good health mattered to people in the past. The research explores small finds that are traditionally associated with personal use (mirrors, combs, glass unguent containers, bronze cosmetic grinders and other additional toilet items) from the main urban-type settlements of south-east Britain. The investigation included collecting data concerning the sites, contexts, dates, materials, types, forms, colours and decoration of these objects, and any associated archaeological remains found with these items. Given the social nature of this work, a contextual approach was central to the design. The research takes an interpretive interdisciplinary position that draws on theoretical models based on the self and other, the body and face, the senses and perception, as well as concepts from material cultural studies, such as agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Britain and Anglo-Saxon Britain: Cultural Differences
    Olivet Nazarene University Digital Commons @ Olivet Undergraduate Student Scholarship – History History Spring 4-12-2021 Roman Britain and Anglo-Saxon Britain: Cultural Differences Levi Michael Berg Olivet Nazarene University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/hist_ugrd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Berg, Levi Michael, "Roman Britain and Anglo-Saxon Britain: Cultural Differences" (2021). Undergraduate Student Scholarship – History. 6. https://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/hist_ugrd/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at Digital Commons @ Olivet. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Student Scholarship – History by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Olivet. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Roman Britain and Anglo-Saxon Britain: Cultural Differences Levi Berg Medieval History Dr. Kyle Robinson April 12, 2021 2 Roman Britain and Anglo-Saxon Britain: Cultural Differences A role of historians is to distinguish between cultural groups. They must investigate the practices and artifacts in order to create a model. This model should accurately explain events such as celebrations, war, or in the case of Britain, cultural intertwining and invasion. Britain is an interesting case to study in the Middle Ages because of the amount of intermixing that takes place. Within the time period of a few hundred years, Britain had seen multiple different distinct people groups inhabit the island. This paper will focus on the major cultural differences of the two earliest invasions, the Romans and Anglo-Saxons, based on militaristic differences, societal differences, and daily life. However, there is another question that may be answered within this research.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY
    ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY EDITED BY RICHARD J.A.TALBERT London and New York First published 1985 by Croom Helm Ltd Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. © 1985 Richard J.A.Talbert and contributors All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Atlas of classical history. 1. History, Ancient—Maps I. Talbert, Richard J.A. 911.3 G3201.S2 ISBN 0-203-40535-8 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-71359-1 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-03463-9 (pbk) Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Also available CONTENTS Preface v Northern Greece, Macedonia and Thrace 32 Contributors vi The Eastern Aegean and the Asia Minor Equivalent Measurements vi Hinterland 33 Attica 34–5, 181 Maps: map and text page reference placed first, Classical Athens 35–6, 181 further reading reference second Roman Athens 35–6, 181 Halicarnassus 36, 181 The Mediterranean World: Physical 1 Miletus 37, 181 The Aegean in the Bronze Age 2–5, 179 Priene 37, 181 Troy 3, 179 Greek Sicily 38–9, 181 Knossos 3, 179 Syracuse 39, 181 Minoan Crete 4–5, 179 Akragas 40, 181 Mycenae 5, 179 Cyrene 40, 182 Mycenaean Greece 4–6, 179 Olympia 41, 182 Mainland Greece in the Homeric Poems 7–8, Greek Dialects c.
    [Show full text]