DOCSLIB.ORG

Indice: Dalle Banche Dati Bibliografiche Pag. 2 91 109 121 132 145 Segnalazioni 161

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indice: Dalle Banche Dati Bibliografiche Pag. 2 91 109 121 132 145 Segnalazioni 161 Indice : Dalle banche dati bibliografiche pag. 2 Masi G, et al. A NATURALISTIC STUDY OF YOUTH REFERRED TO A TERTIARY CARE FACILITY FOR ACUTE HYPOMANIC OR MANIC EPISODE. Brain Sciences. 2020;10:1-17 pag. 91 Chiarenza GA. QUANTITATIVE EEG IN CHILDHOOD ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER AND LEARNING DISABILITIES Clin EEG Neurosci. 2020 pag. 109 Piras IS, et al. GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC MTHFR GENE VARIANTS IN THE MOTHERS OF ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER AFFECTED CHILDREN AS POSSIBLE RISK FACTORS FOR NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS Epigenomics. 2020;12:813-23 pag. 121 Pozzi M, et al. EMERGING DRUGS FOR THE TREATMENT OF ATTENTION-DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER (ADHD). Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs. 2020 pag. 132 Santonastaso O, et al. CLINICAL APPLICATION OF MINDFULNESS-ORIENTED MEDITATION: A PRELIMINARY STUDY IN CHILDREN WITH ADHD Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1-16 pag. 145 Segnalazioni Autori vari. LETTERE. DISABILITÀ, PATOLOGIE CRONICHE COMPLESSE E BISOGNI INEVASI: QUALI PROSPETTIVE? M&B 2020;36:558-560 pag. 161 Gagliano A, et al. PEDIATRIC ACUTE-ONSET NEUROPSYCHIATRIC SYNDROME: A DATA MINING APPROACH TO A VERY SPECIFIC CONSTELLATION OF CLINICAL VARIABLES J Child Adolesc Psychopharmcol 2020;30:495-511 pag. 164 Newsletter – ADHD ottobre 2020 BIBLIOGRAFIA ADHD OTTOBRE 2020 Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020. BEERS WITH PEERS: CHILDHOOD ADHD AND RISK FOR CORRELATED CHANGE IN PERCEIVED PEER AND PERSONAL ALCOHOL USE ACROSS YOUNG ADULTHOOD. Kennedy TM, Walther CAP, Pedersen SL, et al. Background: ADHD poses risk for problematic alcohol use through adulthood. Perceived peer alcohol use, one of the strongest correlates of individuals own alcohol use, is especially salient for adolescents with ADHD. The extent to which this risk extends into young adulthood is unknown, as well as how change in these constructs is associated throughout young adulthood. Methods: In the Pittsburgh ADHD Longitudinal Study, 358 individuals with childhood-diagnosed ADHD and 239 without were prospectively followed from ages 18 to 29. Piecewise, bivariate longitudinal growth modeling was used to examine the change in both peer alcohol use and individuals heavy drinking (binge- drinking frequency), their between-person associations, and differences by ADHD group. The addition of structured residuals probed within-person year-to-year change in peer and personal alcohol use and their prospective associations. Results: Perceived peer alcohol use and individuals heavy drinking frequencies changed together over time concurrently from ages 18 to 21 (piece 1) and 21 to 29 (piece 2). Prospectively, individuals who increased the most in heavy drinking from ages 18 to 21 reported more friends using alcohol at age 29, regardless of ADHD history. Within-person increases in personal alcohol use likewise predicted increased perceived peer use the subsequent year within each age group (piece), regardless of ADHD history. However, while decreasing perceived peer use from ages 21 to 29 was related to more frequent heavy drinking at age 29 for those without ADHD, increasing perceived peer use from ages 18 to 21 predicted more frequent heavy drinking at age 29 for those with ADHD. Conclusions: Young adult heavy drinking changes in tandem with perceived peer alcohol use across individuals and predicts selection of alcohol-using peers from year to year within individuals, further into adulthood than previously documented. Findings suggest the centrality of relationships with alcohol- consuming friends in relation to one’s heavy drinking, especially for young adults with ADHD histories, through the twenties ……………………………………………………………………….. …………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………….. Per la ricerca degli articoli pubblicati nella letteratura scientifica nel mese in esame sono state consultate le banche dati Medline, Embase, PsycINFO e PsycArticle utilizzando le seguenti parole chiave (o i loro sinonimi): 'Attention deficit disorder', 'Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder', 'Infant', 'Child', 'Adolescent', 'Human'. Sono qui riportate le referenze considerate rilevanti e pertinenti. 2 Newsletter – ADHD ottobre 2020 Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2020;131:723-33. EXPOSURE TO SURGERY AND ANESTHESIA IN EARLY CHILDHOOD AND SUBSEQUENT USE OF ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER MEDICATIONS. Ing C, Ma X, Sun M, et al. BACKGROUND: Some recent clinical studies have found that early childhood exposure to anesthesia is associated with increased risks of behavioral deficits and clinical diagnoses of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). While diagnoses in claims data may be subject to inaccuracies, pharmacy claims are highly accurate in reflecting medication use. This study examines the association between exposure to surgery and anesthesia and subsequent ADHD medication use. METHODS: Longitudinal data for children enrolled in Texas and New York Medicaid from 1999 to 2010 were used. We assessed the association between a single exposure to anesthesia before age 5 years for 1 of 4 common pediatric surgical procedures (pyloromyotomy, inguinal hernia repair, circumcisions outside the perinatal period, and tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy) and persistent ADHD medication use (event defined as the initial ADHD medication prescription, and persistent use defined as filling 2 or more ëÑ30- day prescriptions between 6 months following surgery until censoring). Exposed children (n = 42,687) were matched on propensity score (ie, the probability of receiving surgery) estimated in logistic regression including sociodemographic and clinical covariates, to children without anesthesia exposure before age 5 years (n = 213,435). Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the hazard ratio (HR) of ADHD medication use following exposure. Nonpsychotropic medications served as negative controls to determine if exposed children simply had higher overall medication use. RESULTS: Children with a single exposure to surgery and anesthesia were 37% more likely than unexposed children to persistently use ADHD medication (HR, 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.44). The estimated HRs for common nonpsychotropic medication use following a single anesthetic exposure were 1.06 (95% CI, 1.04-1.07) for amoxicillin, 1.10 (95% CI, 1.08-1.12) for azithromycin, and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.05- 1.11) for diphenhydramine. In comparison, the risk of using other psychotropic medication to treat conditions besides ADHD was also significantly higher, with HRs of 1.37 (95% CI, 1.24-1.51) for sedative/anxiolytics, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.25-1.58) for antidepressants, 1.31 (95% CI, 1.20-1.44) for antipsychotics, and 1.24 (95% CI, 1.10-1.40) for mood stabilizers. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid-enrolled children receiving anesthesia for a single common pediatric surgical procedure under age 5 years were 37% more likely to require subsequent persistent use of ADHD medications than unexposed children. Because the increased use of ADHD medication is disproportionately higher than that of nonpsychotropic medications, unmeasured confounding may not account for all of the increase in ADHD medication use. By evaluating Medicaid data, this study assesses children who may be particularly vulnerable to neurotoxic exposures ……………………………………………………………………….. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2020 Sep;45:165-73. DIFFERENT SPECTRAL ANALYSIS METHODS FOR THE THETA/BETA RATIO CALCULATE DIFFERENT RATIOS BUT DO NOT DISTINGUISH ADHD FROM CONTROLS. van Dijk H, DeBeus R, Kerson C, et al. There has been ongoing research on the ratio of theta to beta power (Theta/Beta Ratio, TBR) as an EEG- based test in the diagnosis of ADHD. Earlier studies reported significant TBR differences between patients with ADHD and controls. However, a recent meta-analysis revealed a marked decline of effect size for the difference in TBR between ADHD and controls for studies published in the past decade. Here, we test if differences in EEG processing explain the heterogeneity of findings. We analyzed EEG data from two multi- center clinical studies. Five different EEG signal processing algorithms were applied to calculate the TBR. Differences between resulting TBRs were subsequently assessed for clinical usability in the iSPOT-A dataset. Although there were significant differences in the resulting TBRs, none distinguished between children with and without ADHD, and no consistent associations with ADHD symptoms arose. Different methods for EEG signal processing result in significantly different TBRs. However, none of the methods significantly distinguished between ADHD and healthy controls in our sample. The secular effect size decline 3 Newsletter – ADHD ottobre 2020 for the TBR is most likely explained by factors other than differences in EEG signal processing, e.g. fewer hours of sleep in participants and differences in inclusion criteria for healthy controls ……………………………………………………………………….. Arch Pediatr. 2020. COMPARING THE PREVALENCE OF ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER IN HEARING-IMPAIRED CHILDREN WITH NORMAL-HEARING PEERS. Soleimani R, Jalali MM, Faghih HA. Objectives: The most important aspect of hearing loss is its effect on the communication abilities of individuals. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in hearing-impaired (HI) children with normal-hearing (NH) peers. Methods: A total of 130 children (65 children with severe-to-profound hearing loss and 65 NH peers) participated in this cross-sectional study from November 2013 to May 2014. ADHD Rating Scale IV questionnaires were given to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Drug Information Center Highlights of FDA Activities
    Drug Information Center Highlights of FDA Activities – 3/1/21 – 3/31/21 FDA Drug Safety Communications & Drug Information Updates: Ivermectin Should Not Be Used to Treat or Prevent COVID‐19: MedWatch Update 3/5/21 The FDA advised consumers against the use of ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 following reports of patients requiring medical support and hospitalization after self‐medicating. Ivermectin has not been approved for this use and is not an anti‐viral drug. Health professionals are encouraged to report adverse events associated with ivermectin to MedWatch. COVID‐19 EUA FAERS Public Dashboard 3/15/21 The FDA launched an update to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard that provides weekly updates of adverse event reports submitted to FAERS for drugs and therapeutic biologics used under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) during the COVID‐19 public health emergency. Monoclonal Antibody Products for COVID‐19 – Fact Sheets Updated to Address Variants 3/18/21 The FDA authorized revised fact sheets for health care providers to include susceptibility of SARS‐CoV‐2 variants to each of the monoclonal antibody products available through EUA for the treatment of COVID‐19 (bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab and etesevimab, and casirivimab and imdevimab). Abuse and Misuse of the Nasal Decongestant Propylhexedrine Causes Serious Harm 3/25/21 The FDA warned that abuse and misuse of the nasal decongestant propylhexedrine, sold OTC in nasal decongestant inhalers, has been increasingly associated with cardiovascular and mental health problems. The FDA has recommended product design changes to support safe use, such as modifications to preclude tampering and limits on the content within the device.
    [Show full text]
  • Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Stimulant Step Therapy
    Policy: Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Annual Review Date: Stimulant Step Therapy Policy 03/18/2021 Last Revised Date: 06/17/2021 OVERVIEW All of the long-acting stimulants are indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Some products are also indicated for the treatment of narcolepsy. Vyvanse is the only stimulant medication indicated for the treatment of binge eating disorder (BED). Approval for this indication was based on two 12-week randomized, double- blind, multi-center, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, dose-optimization studies in adults aged 18 to 55 years (n = 374 and n = 350) with moderate to severe BED. Patients from both studies on Vyvanse had a statistically significantly greater reduction from baseline in mean number of binge days/week at Week 12. All of these products have abuse potential and are Schedule II controlled substances. POLICY STATEMENT A step therapy program has been developed to encourage use of one Preferred product prior to the use of a Non-Preferred product. If the step therapy rule is not met for a Non-Preferred agent at the point of service, coverage will be determined by the step therapy criteria below. All approvals are provided for 1 year in duration. Automation: Patients with a history of one Preferred drug within the 130-day look-back period are excluded from step therapy. Preferred Medications: • Generic amphetamine/dextroamphetamine extended-release capsules (generics to Adderall XR) • Generic dexmethylphenidate extended-release capsules (generics
    [Show full text]
  • Nicotinic Receptors in Neurodegeneration
    Send Orders of Reprints at [email protected] 298 Current Neuropharmacology, 2013, 11, 298-314 Nicotinic Receptors in Neurodegeneration Inmaculada Posadas, Beatriz López-Hernández and Valentín Ceña* Unidad Asociada Neurodeath. CSIC-Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Departamento de Ciencias Médicas. Albacete, Spain and CIBERNED, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain Abstract: Many studies have focused on expanding our knowledge of the structure and diversity of peripheral and central nicotinic receptors. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are members of the Cys-loop superfamily of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels, which include GABA (A and C), serotonin, and glycine receptors. Currently, 9 alpha (2-10) and 3 beta (2-4) subunits have been identified in the central nervous system (CNS), and these subunits assemble to form a variety of functional nAChRs. The pentameric combination of several alpha and beta subunits leads to a great number of nicotinic receptors that vary in their properties, including their sensitivity to nicotine, permeability to calcium and propensity to desensitize. In the CNS, nAChRs play crucial roles in modulating presynaptic, postsynaptic, and extrasynaptic signaling, and have been found to be involved in a complex range of CNS disorders including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), schizophrenia, Tourette´s syndrome, anxiety, depression and epilepsy. Therefore, there is growing interest in the development of drugs that modulate nAChR functions with optimal benefits and minimal adverse effects. The present review describes the main characteristics of nAChRs in the CNS and focuses on the various compounds that have been tested and are currently in phase I and phase II trials for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases including PD, AD and age-associated memory and mild cognitive impairment.
    [Show full text]
  • PRODRUG TECHNOLOGY Prodrugs for ADHD Treatments: Opportunities &
    PRODRUG TECHNOLOGY Prodrugs for ADHD Treatments: Opportunities & Potential to Fill Unmet Medical Needs By: Travis Mickle, PhD INTRODUCTION one or more of the ADME categories — Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion — with the goal being the creation of Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neuro- a new chemical entity (NCE) that optimizes the performance, util- logical disorder associated with an ongoing pattern of inattention, ity, and potential life-cycle management of the parent drug. hyperactivity, and/or impulsivity that may impede, for example, cognitive and social functioning, and as well as mental growth and development. Since 1937, more than 25 different products ADHD THERAPEUTIC MARKET have been approved by the FDA to treat ADHD. Despite the many pharmacological advances, there is still no optimal treatment of The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention noted in a this condition, leading prescribers and patients to press for im- 2016 report from the National Survey of Children’s Health that provements that address key shortcomings with currently available 6.1 million, or 9.4% of children aged 4 to 17, suffer from ADHD. ADHD medications. Duration of efficacy, consistency of drug ex- Yet, of all children 2 to 17 years of age that may qualify to take posure and effect, onset of action, and lower abuse potential are ADHD medication, only about 317,000 (or 1 in 20) are currently just some of the key attributes that new technologies are seeking being treated. Globally, there are a reported 175 million cases to address. of ADHD in people 5 to 44 years old, and the forecast indicates In the quest for the optimal ADHD medication, leading re- that this number will rise to more than 185 million by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 87/Friday, May 7, 2021/Rules And
    Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 87 / Friday, May 7, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 24487 that authority because it addresses an (1) With a switch unit serial number (S/N) Branch, send it to the attention of the person unsafe condition that is likely to exist or 1413, 1414, 1415, 1424, 1428, 1430, 1432, or identified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD. develop on helicopters identified in this 1433 installed, or Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR- rulemaking action. (2) With a missing or illegible switch unit [email protected]. S/N or if the S/N cannot be determined, (2) Before using any approved AMOC, Regulatory Findings installed. notify your appropriate principal inspector, Note 1 to paragraph (c): Helicopters with or lacking a principal inspector, the manager This AD will not have federalism a 206L–1+ designation are Model 206L–1 of the local flight standards district office/ implications under Executive Order helicopters. Helicopters with a 206L–3+ certificate holding district office. 13132. This AD will not have a designation are Model 206L–3 helicopters. (i) Related Information substantial direct effect on the States, on Note 2 to paragraph (c): The switch unit the relationship between the national is located on the aft fuel boost pump (1) For more information about this AD, government and the States, or on the assembly. The P/N and S/N for the switch contact Hal Jensen, Aerospace Engineer, unit could be on the outside face of the Operational Safety Branch, FAA, 950 distribution of power and L’Enfant Plaza N SW, Washington, DC 20024; responsibilities among the various attachment flange, in the cross hatched area of the switch unit.
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Joel L. Young, M.D
    Joel L. Young, M.D. 441 South Livernois Road, Suite 100 Rochester Hills, Michigan 48307 Phone: 248-608-8800 / Fax: 248-608-2490 / E-mail: [email protected] Professional History 2000 – Present: Chief Medical Officer and Founder, Clinical Trials Group at the Rochester Center for Behavioral Medicine, Rochester Hills, MI 1993 – Present: Medical Director and Founder, Rochester Center for Behavioral Medicine, Rochester Hills, MI (www.rcbm.net). 2008 (Current): Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI. 2000 – 2007: Medical Director, Crittenton Network for Behavioral Health, Rochester, MI. 2000 – 2002: Chief of Staff, Department of Psychiatry, Crittenton Hospital, Rochester, MI. July, 1993 – 1997: Medical Director, Psychiatric Emergency Services, Crittenton Hospital. July, 1992 – June, 1993: Chief Resident of Adult Services, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, MI. Oct. 1991-Sept. 1993: Unit Psychiatrist, Bon Secours Adolescent Mental Health Unit, Grosse Pointe, MI. August, 1991 – 1996: Consulting Psychiatrist, Beacon Hill Clinic, Birmingham, MI. July, 1991 – June, 1992: Consulting Psychiatrist, Washtenaw County Community Mental Health Services, Ann Arbor, MI. July, 1990 – June, 1992: House Officer, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Hospitals. June, 1989 – June, 1990: Intern, Departments of Internal Medicine, Pediatrics and Psychiatry, University of Michigan Hospitals. Boards 2018 Fellow: American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology 2017 Re-certification of Geriatric Qualifications by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology through 2027. 2017 Re-certification of Forensic Qualifications by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology through 2027 2014 Re-Certification by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology 2007 Re-certification by the American Board of Adolescent Psychiatry.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Decisions Taken by the Harmonized System Committee from the 47Th to 60Th Sessions (2011
    CLASSIFICATION DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE HARMONIZED SYSTEM COMMITTEE FROM THE 47TH TO 60TH SESSIONS (2011 - 2018) WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION Rue du Marché 30 B-1210 Brussels Belgium November 2011 Copyright © 2011 World Customs Organization. All rights reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning translation, reproduction and adaptation rights should be addressed to [email protected]. D/2011/0448/25 The following list contains the classification decisions (other than those subject to a reservation) taken by the Harmonized System Committee ( 47th Session – March 2011) on specific products, together with their related Harmonized System code numbers and, in certain cases, the classification rationale. Advice Parties seeking to import or export merchandise covered by a decision are advised to verify the implementation of the decision by the importing or exporting country, as the case may be. HS codes Classification No Product description Classification considered rationale 1. Preparation, in the form of a powder, consisting of 92 % sugar, 6 % 2106.90 GRIs 1 and 6 black currant powder, anticaking agent, citric acid and black currant flavouring, put up for retail sale in 32-gram sachets, intended to be consumed as a beverage after mixing with hot water. 2. Vanutide cridificar (INN List 100). 3002.20 3. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29 (See “INN List 101” at the end of this publication.) and 30 4. Certain INN products. Chapters 13, 29 (See “INN List 102” at the end of this publication.) and 30 5. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29, (See “INN List 103” at the end of this publication.) 30, 35 and 39 6. Re-classification of INN products.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychiatric Medication Update Objectives Abbreviations
    3/30/2021 Psychiatric Medication Update Kara Gagnon, PharmD, BCPS, BCPP Pharmacy & Behavioral Health Programs Manager Objectives Identify newly approved psychiatric medications Discuss medications currently in the pipeline Review pertinent FDA MedWatch Alerts Evaluate new treatment guidelines for schizophrenia Abbreviations ADHD: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder AP: Antipsychotic CNS: Central Nervous System FDA: Food and Drug Administration FGA: First Generation Antipsychotic SGA: Second Generation Antipsychotic VMAT2: Vesicular monoamine transporter 2 1 3/30/2021 FDA Drug Approval Process ✓ Drug developed ✓ Animals tested ✓ Investigational New Drug (IND) application ✓ Phase 1 → Phase 2 → Phase 3 trials ✓ Review meeting: FDA + drug sponsor ✓ New Drug Application ✓ FDA NDA Review ✓ Drug Labeling ✓ Manufacturer facility inspection ✓ Drug Approval ✓ Post-Marketing monitoring Food and Drug Administration. Drug Approval Process. Accessed March 21, 2021. https://www.fda.gov/media/82381/download FDA Drug Approval Process Faster Approval Options ➢ Accelerated Approval ➢ Fast Track Prescription Drug User Fee Act (1992) FDA MedWatch ➢ Voluntary system for physicians and consumers to report adverse events Food and Drug Administration. Drug Approval Process. Accessed March 21, 2021. https://www.fda.gov/media/82381/download AzstarysTM (serdexmethylphenidate/dexmethylphenidate) FDA Approval: March 2, 2021 CNS stimulant for treatment of ADHD in patients 6 years of age and older Norepinephrine dopamine reuptake inhibitor; Schedule II substance KemPharm, Inc. ➢ LAT® (Ligand Activated Therapy) technology Azstarys. Package Insert. KemPharm Inc. 2021. 2 3/30/2021 AzstarysTM (serdexmethylphenidate/dexmethylphenidate) Novel once-daily oral capsule ➢ First and only product with dexmethylphenidate prodrug Three strengths available ➢ 26.1mg/5.2mg, 39.2mg/7.8mg, 52.3mg/10.4mg Warnings & Precautions ➢ Abuse/dependence, cardiovascular, psychiatric, growth suppression Azstarys.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/001643 Al 7 January 2016 (07.01.2016) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/001643 Al 7 January 2016 (07.01.2016) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agents: GILL JENNINGS & EVERY LLP et al; The A61P 25/28 (2006.01) A61K 31/194 (2006.01) Broadgate Tower, 20 Primrose Street, London EC2A 2ES A61P 25/16 (2006.01) A61K 31/205 (2006.01) (GB). A23L 1/30 (2006.01) (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (21) International Application Number: kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, PCT/GB20 15/05 1898 AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (22) International Filing Date: DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, 29 June 2015 (29.06.2015) HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (25) Filing Language: English KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (26) Publication Language: English PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (30) Priority Data: SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 141 1570.3 30 June 2014 (30.06.2014) GB TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. 1412414.3 11 July 2014 ( 11.07.2014) GB (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (71) Applicant: MITOCHONDRIAL SUBSTRATE INVEN¬ kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, TION LIMITED [GB/GB]; 39 Glasslyn Road, London GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, N8 8RJ (GB).
    [Show full text]
  • ADHD Investor Event Presentation
    ADHD Investor Event October 11, 2018 Cautionary Note Regarding Presentation Information This presentation contains forward-looking statements, including statements about our plans to develop and commercialize our product candidates, our planned clinical trials for our prodrug product candidates, the timing of and our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approvals for our product candidates, including expectations about our ability to use the 505(b)(2) pathway and expedited FDA review, the clinical utility of our product candidates and our intellectual property position. These statements involve substantial known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from the information expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. The forward-looking statements in this presentation represent our views as of the date of this presentation. These and other risks concerning our business are described in additional detail in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 10, 2018, and our other Periodic and Current Reports filed with the SEC. We anticipate that subsequent events and developments will cause our views to change. However, while we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we have no current intention of doing so except to the extent required by applicable law.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Delivery System for Use in the Treatment Or Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders
    (19) TZZ __T (11) EP 2 774 991 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 10.09.2014 Bulletin 2014/37 C12N 15/86 (2006.01) A61K 48/00 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 13001491.3 (22) Date of filing: 22.03.2013 (84) Designated Contracting States: • Manninga, Heiko AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB 37073 Göttingen (DE) GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO •Götzke,Armin PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR 97070 Würzburg (DE) Designated Extension States: • Glassmann, Alexander BA ME 50999 Köln (DE) (30) Priority: 06.03.2013 PCT/EP2013/000656 (74) Representative: von Renesse, Dorothea et al König-Szynka-Tilmann-von Renesse (71) Applicant: Life Science Inkubator Betriebs GmbH Patentanwälte Partnerschaft mbB & Co. KG Postfach 11 09 46 53175 Bonn (DE) 40509 Düsseldorf (DE) (72) Inventors: • Demina, Victoria 53175 Bonn (DE) (54) Drug delivery system for use in the treatment or diagnosis of neurological disorders (57) The invention relates to VLP derived from poly- ment or diagnosis of a neurological disease, in particular oma virus loaded with a drug (cargo) as a drug delivery multiple sclerosis, Parkinsons’s disease or Alzheimer’s system for transporting said drug into the CNS for treat- disease. EP 2 774 991 A1 Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR) EP 2 774 991 A1 Description FIELD OF THE INVENTION 5 [0001] The invention relates to the use of virus like particles (VLP) of the type of human polyoma virus for use as drug delivery system for the treatment or diagnosis of neurological disorders.
    [Show full text]