Revised Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Revised Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report sydney METRO Sydney Metro – Western Sydney Airport Revised Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report April 2021 Sydney Metro - Western Sydney Airport Revised Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Sydney Metro – Western Sydney Airport Revised Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report April 2021 Client: Sydney Metro ABN: 12354063515 Prepared by M2A Level 25, 680 George Street, Sydney NSW 2000 ABN: 60 549 956 366 Sydney Metro - Western Sydney Airport Revised Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Contents Glossary and terms and abbreviations i Executive Summary iv 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Project context and overview 1 1.2 Key project features 1 1.2.1 Off-airport project components 2 1.2.2 On-airport project components 2 1.3 Project construction 4 1.4 Purpose of this technical paper 6 1.4.1 Assessment objectives 6 1.4.2 Secretary’s environmental assessment requirements 6 1.4.3 Assessment guidelines 7 1.4.4 Structure of report 7 1.5 Study area and construction footprint 8 1.6 Project team 9 2. Legislative and policy context 10 2.1 Off-airport legislative and policy context 10 2.1.1 Commonwealth legislation and policy 10 2.1.2 State legislation and policy 12 2.2 On-airport legislative and policy context 14 2.2.1 Commonwealth legislation and policy 14 3. Methodology 16 3.1 Overview 16 3.2 Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report 17 3.3 Background research 18 3.4 Archaeological field investigations 18 3.5 Social/cultural values assessment for the ACHAR 20 3.6 Direct and indirect impact assessment for the ACHAR 20 3.7 Post-ACHAR further survey and targeted test excavation 20 3.8 Aboriginal Archaeological Report 20 3.9 Social/cultural values assessment for the Revised ACHAR 20 4. Aboriginal community consultation 23 4.1 Stage 1 notification and registration 23 4.1.1 Consultation with regulatory agencies 23 4.1.2 Public notification 23 4.1.3 Invitations for expressions of interest 24 4.1.4 Notification of Registered Aboriginal Parties 24 4.2 Stage 2 presentation of information about the project 24 4.3 Stage 3 gathering information about cultural significance 24 4.3.1 Registration of interest 24 4.3.2 Draft assessment methodology 24 4.3.3 Archaeological field investigations 25 4.4 Stage 4 RAP review of draft ACHAR 25 5. Existing environment 27 5.1 Landscape context 27 5.1.1 Physical setting 27 5.1.2 Topography 27 5.1.3 Hydrology 27 5.1.4 Surface geology 28 5.1.5 Soil and geomorphology 28 5.1.6 Flora and fauna 29 5.1.7 Historical land use 31 5.1.8 Land disturbance 37 5.2 Archaeological context 38 5.2.1 Off-airport archaeological background 38 5.2.2 On-airport archaeological background 48 Sydney Metro - Western Sydney Airport Revised Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report 5.3 Regional context 50 5.4 Local context 52 5.4.1 Off-airport local context 52 5.4.2 On-airport local context 57 5.5 Ethnographic context 59 5.5.1 The Darug language and people 59 5.5.2 Post-contact history 59 6. Archaeological field investigations 64 6.1 Aims and objectives 64 6.2 Field investigation strategy 64 6.3 Field team and methods 64 6.4 Investigation results 64 7. Cultural heritage values and statement of significance 67 7.1 Overview 67 7.2 Principles of assessment 67 7.3 Scientific values 68 7.3.1 Rarity and representativeness 69 7.3.2 Identification process 69 7.3.3 Identified scientific values 70 7.3.4 Assessment of scientific significance 77 7.4 Cultural values 82 7.5 Historic values 82 7.6 Aesthetic values 82 7.7 Consolidated statement of significance 82 8. Assessment of potential impacts 84 8.1 Overview 84 8.2 Archaeological sensitivity 84 8.3 Cultural values 84 8.4 Potential off-airport impacts 84 8.4.1 Potential impacts to identified values 84 8.5 Potential on-airport impacts 90 8.5.1 Potential impacts to identified values 90 8.6 Summary 92 9. Cumulative impact assessment 93 9.1 Western Sydney International 93 9.2 Future M12 Motorway 93 9.3 The Northern Road upgrade 93 9.4 Cumulative impacts 94 10. Proposed management and mitigation measures 95 10.1 Approach to management and mitigation 95 10.2 Performance outcomes 95 10.3 Proposed mitigation measures 95 11. References 98 Appendix A Consultation log Appendix B Agency responses Appendix C Newspaper advertisements Appendix D Expression of Interest (EOI) letter Appendix E EES and LALC notification Sydney Metro - Western Sydney Airport Revised Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Appendix F Draft assessment methodology Appendix G RAP responses to draft assessment methodology Appendix H RAP responses to draft ACHAR Appendix I Regional archaeological context Appendix J AHIMS Search Results Appendix K Previous and current AHIPs Appendix L Ethnographic context List of figures Figure 1-1 Project alignment and key features 3 Figure 1-2 Construction footprint overview 5 Figure 3-1 Aboriginal archaeological assessment, reporting and management process flowchart 17 Figure 5-1 Excerpt from Dixon’s Map of the Colony of NSW, 1837 (source: SLNSW/IE3742276). Approximate location of the project shown in red. Labels indicating holdings of Governor King and Colonel O’Connell are shown to the north of the project 31 Figure 5-2 Excerpt from Map of the County of Cumberland, NSW 1894 (HLRV/1562201.jp2). Approximate location of the St Marys Station and northern portions of the construction footprint shown in red 32 Figure 5-3 Excerpt from Map of the County of Cumberland, NSW 1894 (HLRV/1562201.jp2). Approximate location of the middle portion of the construction footprint shown in red 33 Figure 5-4 Excerpt from Map of the County of Cumberland, NSW 1894 (HLRV/1562201.jp2). Approximate location of the southern portion of the construction footprint shown in red 33 Figure 5-5 AHIMS sites, transects and test pits 60 Figure 7-1 Identified sites and AHIMS sites 78 List of tables Table E-1 AHIMS sites within the on-airport construction footprint vi Table E-2 Off-airport AHIMS sites and mitigation measures (including sites within the construction footprint and those outside its bounds but within 100 metres) vii Table 1-1 Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements 6 Table 5-1 Development of land holdings within the construction footprint as depicted in parish maps 34 Table 5-2 Disturbance rating scheme 38 Table 5-3 Previous off-airport Aboriginal archaeological investigations 38 Table 5-4 Previous on-airport Aboriginal archaeological investigations 48 Table 5-5 AHIMS search results 53 Table 5-6 AHIMS sites within the off-airport construction footprint 54 Table 5-7 AHIMS sites within 200 metres of the off-airport construction footprint (excluding destroyed sites) 54 Table 5-8 AHIMS sites within the on-airport construction footprint 57 Table 5-9 AHIMS sites within 200 metres of the on-airport construction footprint 57 Sydney Metro - Western Sydney Airport Revised Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Table 7-1 Values relevant to determining cultural significance, as defined by The Burra Charter (1999) 68 Table 7-2 Aboriginal archaeological sites within the off-airport construction footprint 70 Table 7-3 Scientific significance assessment for identified Aboriginal sites within the off- airport construction footprint 71 Table 8-1 Potential off-airport direct impacts summary 85 Table 10-1 Performance outcomes for the project in relation to Aboriginal heritage 95 Table 10-2 Mitigation measures 95 Sydney Metro - Western Sydney Airport Revised Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Glossary and terms and abbreviations Term Definition AAR Aboriginal Archaeological Report Aboriginal archaeological Area retains potential for the presence of surface and/or sensitivity subsurface Aboriginal archaeological deposits. Areas of Aboriginal archaeological sensitivity, when compared to areas of low potential, would be expected to have higher artefact counts, densities and assemblage richness values expected. Archaeological features such as knapping floors and hearths are also more likely to occur in these areas. The integrity of deposit(s) will be dependent on the nature of localised land disturbance activities and geomorphic phenomena. Aboriginal cultural heritage The tangible (objects) and intangible (dreaming stories, song lines and places) cultural practices and traditions associated with past and present day Aboriginal communities Aboriginal object Any deposit, object or material evidence (not being a handicraft made for sale), including Aboriginal remains, relating to the Aboriginal habitation of NSW Aboriginal place Any place declared to be an Aboriginal place under Section 94 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) ACHAR Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report ACHMP Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management Plan AEPR Airports (Environment Protection) Regulations 1997 AHD Australian Height Datum AHIMS Aboriginal Heritage Information Management System - a register of New South Wales (NSW) Aboriginal heritage information maintained by Environment, Energy and Science (EES), which is a group within the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment AHIP Aboriginal Heritage Impact Permit ASIR Aboriginal Site Impact Recording ATSIHP Act Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 BNI Blacktown Native Institution BP Before Present is a term used by archaeologists and geologists referring to dates obtained by radiocarbon dating. The “present” in this case is not the present day, which is constantly changing and therefore is unable to be used as a consistent point from which to measure. Instead the year 1950 was chosen to be used as the
Recommended publications
  • Statement of Heritage Impact
    Heritage Assessment Assessment of Heritage Significance at 125 Heath Road Leppington RAPPOPORT PTY LTD © CONSERVATION ARCHITECTS AND HERITAGE CONSULTANTS 45 Hardie Street, Mascot NSW 2020 (02) 9693 1788 [email protected] Job No. 2281 January 2015 Heritage Impact Statements RAPPOPORT Heritage Approvals & Reports Conservation Management Plans Interpretation Strategies HERITAGE Photographic Archival Recording On-site Conservation Architect Expert Heritage Advice CONSULTANTS Conservation Management Documents Heritage Assessment 125 Heath Road Leppington Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 HISTORICAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................................... 5 3.0 PHYSICAL EVIDENCE AND SETTING ...................................................................................... 11 4.0 ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ........................................................................................... 19 5.0 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................... 24 6.0 SOURCES ............................................................................................................................. 25 The following table forms part of the quality management control undertaken by Rappoport Pty Ltd regarding the monitoring of its intellectual property as issued. Issue Notes / Description
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Camden Show Program of Events.Pdf
    Camden Show HOW TO BECOME A MEMBER CAMDEN SHOW ATTRACTIONS Camden Show TH TH 2 BIG DAYS OF FAMILY FUN! Friday 27 & Saturday 28 If you are interested in becoming a Member please visit the Show Office or our website below and fill out a LUMBERJACKS ...‘Still a Country Show’ March 2020 2020 Membership Form. Get ready to laugh and cheer, as the Lumberjacks are back at the Camden Show for 2020. You will see speed climbing SUPREME CHAMPION SPONSORS Available till 5pm and racing up and down 50 foot climbing poles, old time 2020 MEMBERSHIP - Annually Including GST 27th March log rolling, plus chainsaw carving and much more, as these whackyLumberjacksdueloffinacomicalbattletoseewho ADULT 21 years and over $32.00 is the best in the bush! JUNIOR 16 - 20 years $27.00 Travelling all the way from Canada the team of Lumberjacks deliver a high energy, action packed Show that is guaranteed 6 - 15 years of age CHILD $5.00 to leave you laughing, clapping, cheering and letting out the CHILDREN Under 6 years of age FREE odd scream. The Show is well suited for all ages and is a mustsee!!!Youcanevenhaveagoataxethrowingyourself. MACARTHUR & NARELLAN AGED PENSIONER/SENIOR on production of card $15.00 JOINING FEE $10.00 INVICTUS X GRAND CHAMPION SPONSORS ELJAY FREESTYLE ENTERTAINMENT SHOW This Entitles A Member: Action packed motorcycle and 1. Free entry to the ground for both Friday & Saturday on production of ticket. bicycle trials stunt show with a twist 2. MembersareentitledtoentertheirownbonafideExhibitsatreducedentry of comedy. The Eljay team consists fees in most sections. of highly skilled, professional and experiencedriderswhocontinually 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Western Sydney Regional Transportation Study
    GREATER WESTERN SYDNEY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY: FORECASTING TRAVEL DEMAND Authored by: Helen Battellino and Carolyn Stone PPM Consultants Pty Ltd 101 Sussex Street Sydney NSW 2000 [email protected] [email protected] Greater Western Sydney Transportation Study Battellino & Stone Acknowledgements The authors wish to acknowledge the Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils for initiating and funding this project. The project would also not have been possible without the expertise and dedication of Dr Nariida Smith and the Transport Futures Team at the CSIRO who undertook the analysis of the data on current travel trends and Paul van den Bos of Computing in Transportation who modelled the scenarios using the Sydney Strategic Travel Model (STM). The authors would also like to thank David Kilsby (Kilsby Australia) for his assistance in developing the model inputs, the Transport Population and Data Centre (TPDC) for providing access to the STM and Frank Milthorpe, Modelling Manager, TPDC, for his advice in using the STM. This work was also made possible by using systems developed for scenario modelling using the STM by David Kilsby and Paul van den Bos in previous projects for the then Department of Transport. This work is as yet not publicly available. The results of this study and the views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. State of Australian Cities National Conference 2003 Page 2 Greater Western Sydney Transportation Study Battellino & Stone 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background This paper is based on a consulting project undertaken for the Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils (WSROC) to help understand the travel demand patterns that might arise from various land use and transport infrastructure scenarios in Western Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Paper 6 Flooding, Hydrology and Water Quality
    ͧ¼²»§ Ó»¬®± É»­¬»®² ͧ¼²»§ ß·®°±®¬ Ì»½¸²·½¿´ п°»® ê Ú´±±¼·²¹ô ¸§¼®±´±¹§ ¿²¼ ©¿¬»® ¯«¿´·¬§ Sydney Metro - Western Sydney Airport Technical Paper 6: Flooding, hydrology and water quality Table of Contents Glossary and terms of abbreviation i Executive Summary vi Project overview vi This hydrology, flooding and water quality assessment vi Assessment methodology vii Existing conditions vii Potential construction impacts vii Potential operation impacts vii Proposed management and mitigation measures vii 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Project context and overview 1 1.2 Key project features 1 1.3 Project need 4 1.4 Project construction 4 1.5 Purpose of this Technical Paper 6 1.5.1 Assessment requirements 6 1.5.2 Commonwealth agency assessment requirements 8 1.5.3 Structure of this report 8 1.6 Study area 8 2.0 Legislative and policy context 11 2.1 Off-airport legislation and policy context 11 2.1.1 Commonwealth policy 11 2.1.2 State legislation and policy 12 2.2 On-airport legislative and policy context 18 2.2.1 Airports Act 1996 18 2.2.2 Airports (Environment Protection) Regulations 1997 18 2.3 Guidelines 19 3.0 Methodology 21 3.1 Flooding 21 3.1.1 Operational impact flooding criteria 23 3.2 Geomorphology 25 3.3 Catchment and watercourse health 25 3.4 Water quality 25 3.4.1 Existing Water Quality Environment 26 3.4.2 Water Sensitive Urban Design 26 3.4.3 Impact assessment 26 3.4.4 Water Quality Mitigation Measures 27 3.4.5 Water Quality Monitoring 27 4.0 Existing environment 28 4.1 Existing environment (off-airport) 28 4.1.1 Catchment overview 28
    [Show full text]
  • South West Rail Link - Glenfield to Leppington - M28
    Worksite Protection Planning Diagrams South West Rail Link - Glenfield to Leppington - M28 Stations Covered GLENFIELD 2 EDMONDSON PARK 8 LEPPINGTON 17 Kilometrage References 41.755km 2 45.000km 7 50.000km 15 53.384km 22 Mon, 09 August 2021 @ 13:54:04 EST MAGEE LANE 41.755km 41.905km 42.055km A RAILWAY PARADE WENTWORTH AVENUE 60 75 75 S 42+070 S S 42+068 S S 42+080 S S 42+017 S GD21 RAILWAY PARADE X60 S 41+999 S S 41+958 S 62A DOWN EAST HILLS S 41+948 S S 41+905 S S 41+869 S X45 DOWN LEPPINGTON MAIN LINE 60A60B - 62B S 42+031 S GD 16 CO_ACTING 16 GD S 41+825 S S 41+820 S DOWN EAST HILLS S 41+795 S S 41+793 S S 41+775 S 4 S 41+777 S 42 KM 23 GD S 41+756 S DOWN MAIN SOUTH UP LEPPINGTON MAIN 115 S41+732 S41+730 100 3 GLENFIELD 60A 75 115 63A UP MAIN SOUTH GD 16 GD DOWN MAIN SOUTH X40 Glenfield South Jct X40 GLENFIELD UP ESCAPE ROAD 61B 60 60 115 115 115 115 P UP MAIN SOUTH 2 60 NEXT UP 56B 80 100 UP EAST HILLS X60 DOWN MAIN SOUTH 61A X60 80 80 60 60 60 1 60 105 UP MAIN56A SOUTH 15 UP EAST HILLS GD 18 GD SSFL MAIN LINE 80 80 80 80 GD 15 GD 60 60 70 42+069 S S 42+008 S S 42+037 S S 42+035 S S 42+019 S S 41+971 S S 41+929 S S 41+820 S GD 20 GD S 41+887 S S 41+770 S S41+720 S 41+729 S S 41+758 S FOOTBRIDGE N GLENFIELD STATION GLENFIELD S00 41.761 U 41.761 S00 A 42.055km 42.206km 42.356km S 42+363 S GB 42+360 GB S 42+306 S RAILWAY PARADE 42+303 S (SWRL) VIADICT DOWN S 42+254 S FLYOVER SOUTHERN S 42+243 S S 42+374 S GD 24 GD CLEARED POINTS CARS 8 S 42+185 S S 42+204 S S 42+155 S S 42+127 S DOWN EAST HILLS 60 S 42+098 S 75 75 S 42+070 S S 42+068
    [Show full text]
  • 17 Roberts Road, Eastern Creek
    17 ROBERTS ROAD, EASTERN CREEK SSD-10330 Proposed Data Centre Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Prepared for: Canberra Data Centres Pty Ltd PO Box 304 JERRABOMBERRA NSW 2619 SLR Ref: 610.18883-R05 Version No: -v2.0 November 2019 Canberra Data Centres Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 610.18883-R05-v2.0-Eastern Creek BDAR-20191111.docx 17 Roberts Road, Eastern Creek November 2019 SSD-10330 Proposed Data Centre Biodiversity Development Assessment Report PREPARED BY SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd ABN 29 001 584 612 10 Kings Road New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia (PO Box 447 New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia) T: +61 2 4037 3200 E: [email protected] www.slrconsulting.com BASIS OF REPORT This report has been prepared by SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (SLR) with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the timescale and resources allocated to it by agreement with Canberra Data Centres Pty Ltd (the Client). Information reported herein is based on the interpretation of data collected, which has been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. This report is for the exclusive use of the Client. No warranties or guarantees are expressed or should be inferred by any third parties. This report may not be relied upon by other parties without written consent from SLR. SLR disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the work. DOCUMENT CONTROL Reference Date Prepared Checked Authorised 610.18883-R05-v2.0 11 November 2019 Fiona Iolini and David Martin Jeremy
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Cumberland Plain Report 2017-2018
    About this report The Cumberland Plain, Western Sydney is our home - and it is in crisis. Government policy on population, planning and biodiversity are driving some of the highest rates of landclearing seen anywhere in the world and forcibly displacing entire rural communities. Our communities and our ecosystems are at breaking point: this is a war on people, community and the wild. This report outlines the state of the natural environment of Cumberland Plain in 2018 in our own voices. The Cumberland Plain is more than just an ecosystem or a calculation of hectares conserved and lost: it is our home and the traditional lands of the Darug and Gundungurra people. This report presents a review of the state of the environment in Western Sydney from the voices of local experts and volunteers here on the ground. The report has been published by the The Greater Sydney Landcare Network (GSLN), a membership-based community organisation that aims to support individuals and groups who are working to protect, restore and improve the natural environment of Greater Sydney. The report has been developed collectively through the Cumberland Conservation Network (CCN), an informal network of over 80 local conservation-minded people in Western Sydney. The CCN brings together the local environment groups, community champions, Bushcare and Landcare leaders, teachers, ecologists and government staff to provide a common voice on issues we care about. A number of incorporated groups have also provided support to this report including: ● Greater Sydney Landcare Network ● National Parks Association - Macarthur Branch ● Blacktown & District Environment Group ● Mulgoa Landcare ● Razorback Environment Protection Society Cover: Eastern Grey Kangaroos at Shanes Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Sydney – Australia's Development Site
    2018 Real Estate Outlook | Market and investment Western Sydney – Australia's development site The surge in infrastructure development and real estate construction projects to accommodate Sydney’s growing population has begun. What is your Western Sydney strategy? Today, we have moved from ambitious Over the past five years, Western Sydney concepts to more practical plans, many has been in transition from the poor of which are under construction. A customer to the big and shiny CBD to its number of major government-backed east to a region full of potential - with the infrastructure projects are already promise of a key real estate, development underway and others are progressing and construction hub. through the planning process. These large-scale projects are injecting Back when people would ask: ‘Why are you confidence into the private sector to in Western Sydney?’ there was a stirring invest in the region through all forms recognition of the need for Western Sydney of development. to thrive in order to unlock the economic potential in NSW, and potentially Australia. This was also driven by the need to accommodate our growing population. 01 2018 Real Estate Outlook | Market and investment A more integrated planning environment continued growth in industrial and logistics has also helped, with the creation of the facilities around the Moorebank intermodal The question we Greater Sydney Commission and the terminal along the M4/M7 corridor. now ask, is not, release of the integrated Future Transport As jobs and supporting infrastructure are Strategy for NSW. built, the demand for housing will continue. ‘why are you in Precincts and zones are emerging across Government policy decisions around land the region, which are going to provide release and planning approvals will be critical.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Conservation Values of Commonwealth Land in Western Sydney
    Review of the Conservation Values of Commonwealth land in Western Sydney TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. METHODOLOGY 1 3. RESULTS 2 3.1 Llandilo Conservation Values 4 3.2 Orchard Hills Conservation Values 8 3.3 Ingleburn Conservation Values 11 3.4 Holsworthy Conservation Values 15 4. DISCUSSION 20 5. CONCLUSION 22 1. INTRODUCTION The requirement for this review follows a decision by the Howard Government in 2001 in which it was decided that 828 hectares, including all of the endangered Cumberland Plain Woodland, on the former Australian Defence Industries Site in the western Sydney suburb of St Mary’s was to be protected. Around the time of this decision, the Environment Minister Senator the Hon Robert Hill noted in a media release that Cumberland Plain Woodland was once abundant in western Sydney but due to intense agricultural and urban development only eight per cent now remained. In a media release, Senator Hill stated that the Government would commission a review of all remaining Commonwealth open space in western Sydney to assess its conservation values. Senator Hill suggested that the purpose of the review was to ensure that future development of such land is compatible with good conservation practice. 2. METHODOLOGY The Department of Environment & Heritage has conducted an assessment of Commonwealth properties in western Sydney using existing in–house data on tenure, vegetation mapping, species point location records and National Estate values. In view of the commitment to review open space, only properties that were larger than 5 hectares were considered. A list of properties was derived from NSW Department of Information Technology and Management in the absence of a comprehensive Commonwealth list.
    [Show full text]
  • Crown Cemetery Development, Varroville
    CROWN CEMETERY DEVELOPMENT, VARROVILLE Presentation from the Scenic Hills Association at Public Meeting of the Independent Planning Commission, 25 March 2019 (Copy provided 26 March 2019) I am the Convenor of the Scenic Hills Association (Association) as well as an owner of state listed Varro Ville Homestead which this cemetery proposal completely surrounds. I am speaking here as the Convenor of the Association though at times I will, of necessity, refer to issues that my husband and I are more involved in. We oppose this Development Application. Trust and Confidence in the Process Unlike the Wallacia cemetery proposal, also being considered by the Planning Commission, cemeteries are and were prohibited in the Scenic Hills E3 Environmental Protection Area, when the Catholic Metropolitan Cemeteries Trust (or CMCT) took out an option on this land at 166-176 St Andrews Road Varroville and applied for a spot-rezoning. It is now almost six years that the community has been fighting this proposal, during which time there has been a notable lack of integrity in the planning process at every level of government, starting with a questionable land deal at the heart of this proposal involving a land developer and certain people on our own Council, that has left us without any trust in the planning system - such that if this cemetery is approved as currently recommended by the Department of Planning (DOP), we will not leave any stone unturned in getting this whole saga investigated by whatever means. We have supported various proposals put to us over the last year – from an integrity commission with powers to investigate past projects (during the Kaldas Review of Governance in the NSW Planning System) to a Royal Commission into the Planning System proposed by the Greens at the election last weekend.
    [Show full text]
  • OUR GREATER SYDNEY 2056 Western City District Plan – Connecting Communities
    OUR GREATER SYDNEY 2056 Western City District Plan – connecting communities March 2018 Updated 2 Acknowledgement of Country Western City District The Greater Sydney Commission Blue Mountains acknowledges the traditional owners Camden Campbelltown of the lands that include Western City Fairfield District and the living culture of the Hawkesbury Liverpool traditional custodians of these lands. Penrith The Commission recognises that the Wollondilly traditional owners have occupied and cared for this Country over countless generations, and celebrates their continuing contribution to the life of Greater Sydney. Greater Sydney Commission | Draft Western City District Plan 3 Foreward Chief Commissioner I am delighted to present the Western Collaboration is the key to transparent Lucy Hughes Turnbull AO City District Plan, which sets out planning and informed decision-making on our priorities and actions for improving the city’s future growth. The Greater Sydney quality of life for residents as the district Commission will continue to bring grows and changes. together all parties with an interest in the The Plan recognises what the Greater District’s future and channel the collective Sydney Commission has heard – energy into improved planning outcomes. particularly that the District’s natural By taking a leadership role, we are bringing landscape is a great asset and attractor, together public resources and expertise sustaining and supporting a unique, to create a more liveable, productive and parkland city. sustainable city. This Plan complements those natural Finally, on behalf of the Greater Sydney assets, and it puts people first. It Commission, I acknowledge the important leverages the transformative, economic work of councils whose submissions improvements from the Western Sydney and feedback on the needs of their Airport and considers the transport, neighbourhoods and centres have been infrastructure, services, affordable invaluable.
    [Show full text]
  • South Creek Subcatchment
    South Creek Appendix 4.2 Appendix Subcatchment summaries Subcatchment South Creek Subcatchment South Creek The South Creek subcatchment encompasses most of the Cumberland Plain of Western Sydney. The catchment is a shale-based catchment with no gorges or sandstone dominated landscapes. The majority of the streams are “meandering vertical” river channel types streams, which are under great threat as they are confi ned largely to the Cumberland Plain in the Hawkesbury Nepean catchment. South Creek subcatchment is perhaps the most degraded subcatchment in the Hawkesbury Nepean. Hydrological and sediment regimes have been dramatically altered due to catchment vegetation clearance and increasing urbanisation. Increasing impervious surfaces in the catchment are causing changes to hydrology which has greatly altered the geomorphology and ecology of the watercourses. A number of major Sewerage Treatment Plants discharge into South Creek and these, along with stormwater from urban areas and agricultural run off , contribute to the poor water quality of the streams. The recovery potential of the catchment’s streams is very low; however, there are some very important remnants of endangered vegetation along the riparian zones. The watercourses form extremely important habitat corridors although heavy woody weed invasion exists in the riparian zones. HAWKESBURY NEPEAN RIVER HEALTH STRATEGY 69 70 70 Reach Management Recommendations – South Creek Subcatchment Reach Name Reach Riparian Land Reach Values Reach Threats Reach management recommendations
    [Show full text]