Central Valley Chinook Salmon In-River Escapement Monitoring Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Central Valley Chinook Salmon In-River Escapement Monitoring Plan State of California The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CENTRAL VALLEY CHINOOK SALMON IN-RIVER ESCAPEMENT MONITORING PLAN By Jennifer M. Bergman Fisheries Biologist Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Ryan M. Nielson Biometrician/Project Manager Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. and Alice Low Staff Environmental Scientist California Department of Fish and Game Fisheries Branch Administrative Report Number: 2012-1 January, 2012 NOTE TO READERS The Central Valley Chinook Salmon In-river Escapement Monitoring Plan is a science- based collaborative approach to improve monitoring of adult Chinook salmon returning from the ocean to spawn in CV streams (escapement) and harvested in freshwater. Accurate estimates of escapement are critical to sound management of ocean and inland harvest and monitoring the recovery of listed stocks. A result of requests from fisheries resource managers, the development of this plan was funded in 2007 by the CALFED Ecosystem Restoration Program. From 2008 to 2011, the project team conducted a thorough statistical review of methods currently used in CV escapement surveys. Sampling designs were reviewed and recommendations were made for improvement of the field and analytical methods used in the existing programs. The most appropriate survey/monitoring technique (i.e., mark- recapture carcass surveys, redd surveys, snorkel surveys, and fish device counters) was identified for each watershed. To improve data management and reporting, an online database was reorganized and updated to provide a centralized location for sharing CV Chinook salmon escapement estimates and annual monitoring reports. Various population models have been used to estimate escapement from mark-recapture carcass survey data, without measures of precision and bias. The pooled Petersen, modified Schaefer, and Jolly-Seber models have been used for many years in the CV. Based on a review of the available mark-recapture models and simulation modeling, this plan recommends replacement of the models currently used with the superpopulation modification of the Cormack-Jolly-Seber (ClS) model. Successful implementation of this monitoring plan will rely on continuation of the collaborative and dedicated efforts of multiple agencies and entities throughout the CV. As with all of its products, Fisheries Branch is very interested in ascertaining the utility of this document, particularly regarding to its application to the monitoring and management decision process. Therefore, we encourage you to provide us with your comments. Please be assured that they will help us direct future efforts. Comments should be directed to Dr. Russell Bellmer, Fisheries Branch Monitoring Program Lead, 830 S Street, Sacramento, CA 95814,916327-8840, [email protected]. s~ Chief, Fisheries Branch TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..........................................................................................xiii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2 ESTIMATING CHINOOK SALMON ESCAPEMENT USING FISH DEVICE COUNTERS.................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 3 ESTIMATING CHINOOK SALMON ESCAPEMENT USING MARK-RECAPTURE CARCASS SURVEYS ............................................................ 19 CHAPTER 4 RECOVERING CODED-WIRE TAGS AND COLLECTING BIOLOGICAL DATA.................................................................................................... 31 CHAPTER 5 RECOMMENDATION FOR ESTIMATING TOTAL ANGLER HARVEST AND ANGLER EFFORT WITH THE CENTRAL VALLEY ANGLER SURVEY .......................................................................................................................... 36 CHAPTER 6 RECOMMENDED CHINOOK SALMON ESCAPEMENT MONITORING FOR THE BASALT AND POROUS LAVA DIVERSITY GROUP ........................................................................................................................................... 42 1 MAINSTEM SACRAMENTO RIVER................................................................ 42 1.1 WINTER-RUN CHINOOK SALMON................................................................ 42 SUMMARY OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)....................................................... 42 REVIEW OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)............................................................ 46 RECOMMENDED MONITORING .................................................................... 47 1.2 FALL-RUN CHINOOK SALMON..................................................................... 49 SUMMARY OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)....................................................... 49 REVIEW OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)............................................................ 54 RECOMMENDED MONITORING .................................................................... 55 1.3 LATE FALL-RUN CHINOOK SALMON .......................................................... 57 SUMMARY OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)....................................................... 57 REVIEW OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)............................................................ 58 RECOMMENDED MONITORING .................................................................... 58 2 COW CREEK....................................................................................................... 58 2.1 FALL-RUN CHINOOK SALMON..................................................................... 58 SUMMARY OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)....................................................... 58 REVIEW OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)............................................................ 59 RECOMMENDED MONITORING .................................................................... 59 3 BEAR CREEK...................................................................................................... 60 3.1 FALL-RUN CHINOOK SALMON..................................................................... 60 SUMMARY OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)....................................................... 60 REVIEW OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)............................................................ 61 RECOMMENDED MONITORING .................................................................... 61 3.2 LATE FALL-RUN CHINOOK SALMON .......................................................... 61 RECOMMENDED MONITORING .................................................................... 61 4 BATTLE CREEK................................................................................................. 62 4.1 WINTER-RUN CHINOOK SALMON................................................................ 62 SUMMARY OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)....................................................... 62 REVIEW OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)............................................................ 66 RECOMMENDED MONITORING .................................................................... 66 4.2 SPRING-RUN CHINOOK SALMON ................................................................. 66 SUMMARY OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)....................................................... 66 REVIEW OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)............................................................ 66 RECOMMENDED MONITORING .................................................................... 66 4.3 FALL-RUN CHINOOK SALMON..................................................................... 67 SUMMARY OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)....................................................... 67 REVIEW OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)............................................................ 68 RECOMMENDED MONITORING .................................................................... 68 4.4 LATE FALL-RUN CHINOOK SALMON .......................................................... 68 SUMMARY OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)....................................................... 68 RECOMMENDED MONITORING .................................................................... 68 CHAPTER 7 RECOMMENDED CHINOOK SALMON ESCAPEMENT MONITORING FOR THE NORTHERN SIERRA NEVADA DIVERSITY GROUP ........................................................................................................................................... 69 5 ANTELOPE CREEK............................................................................................ 69 5.1 SPRING-RUN CHINOOK SALMON ................................................................. 69 SUMMARY OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)....................................................... 69 REVIEW OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)............................................................ 69 RECOMMENDED MONITORING .................................................................... 70 5.2 FALL-RUN CHINOOK SALMON..................................................................... 70 RECOMMENDED MONITORING .................................................................... 71 5.3 LATE FALL-RUN CHINOOK SALMON .......................................................... 71 RECOMMENDED MONITORING .................................................................... 71 6 MILL CREEK....................................................................................................... 71 6.1 SPRING-RUN CHINOOK SALMON ................................................................. 71 SUMMARY OF EXISTING PROGRAM(S)......................................................
Recommended publications
  • Fisheries and Aquaculture in Europe
    No 53 October 2011 Fisheries and aquaculture in Europe Reform: raising consumer awareness 2012 TACs & quotas: towards maximum sustainable yield Bluefin tuna: tightening controls Slow Fish: the sustainable fish fair A European Commission publication I Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries I ISSN 1830-6586 KLAG11053ENC_001.pdf 1 07/11/11 16:31 Calendar Conferences and meetings 2 Calendar NEAFC, annual meeting of parties, London (United Kingdom), 7-11 November 2011 3 > For more information: Editorial Website: www.neafc.org E-mail: [email protected] 4-7 Campaign Tel.: +44 207 631 00 16 CFP reform: ICCAT, regular meeting of the Commission, A campaign to raise consumers’ awareness Istanbul (Turkey), 11-19 November 2011 > For more information: Maria Damanaki: Website: www.iccat.int E-mail: [email protected] ‘I think we can make this fundamental Tel.: +34 91 416 56 00 change because people care about fisheries.’ WCPFC, regular session, Koror (Palau), 5-9 December 2011 8 Event > For more information: Website: www.wcpfc.int Slow Fish: the sustainable fish fair E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +691 320 1992 or 320 1993 9 In the news Institutional agenda TACs 2012: moving closer to maximum sustainable yield Agriculture and Fisheries Council of the European Union • 14-15 November 2011, Brussels (Belgium) • 15-16 December 2011, Brussels (Belgium) 10-11 Out and about > For more information: Website: www.consilium.europa.eu Bluefin tuna: tighter controls produce results Committee on Fisheries, European Parliament • 22-23 November 2011, Brussels
    [Show full text]
  • Report on a Tour of Fish Facilities in the Republic of Ireland, September
    {!L-.4() c_ .;-1. k tP'R l i\J rs LI Bt<~\kY PACIFIC BJULUGlCAL Sl AllUN REPORT ON A TOUR OF FISH FACILITIES IN THE REPU BLIC OF IRELAND SEPTEMBER 27-29, 1962 by -C. H. Clay, Chief Fish Culture Development Branch Pacific Area Department of - Fisheries~ Canada Vancouver, B. c. CATNo 29202 Under sponsorship of the Department of Fisheries, Canada, the author is attending the 11-month International Course in Hydraulic Engineering at the Technological University, Delft, The Netherlands, commencing in October, 19620 While in Europe the author also plans to inspect fisheries installations in Scotland, Ireland, France, Germany, and the Scandinavian countries o Assisted by a financial grant from the Institute of Fisheries at the University of British Columbia he recently inspected a number of fish facilities in the Republic of Ireland. This report describes the installations visited and sets forth his observations. Photog raphs of many of the installations referred to in the text appear at the back of the report o On arrival in Dublin I was met by Mr. C. J. McGrath, who is in cparge of a staff of foµr engineers and several technicians engaged in work related to inland fisheries . This work involves mainly salmon stream improvement, fishways in dams, pollution control, and artificial propaga­ tion of salmon and trout. We proceeded to the offices of the Fisheries Division, Department of Lands, 3 Cathal Brugha St., in Dublin where I was introduced to Mr. B . Lenihan, T.D ., Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Lands, and Mr. L. Tobin, Assistant Secretary, Department of Lands, Fisheries Division.
    [Show full text]
  • EMO Hannover a 360 Degree View Mitsubishi Electric Europe
    The smart magazine for users ! Pro Issue 02 · December 2013 EMO SPECIAL file What you couldn’t afford to miss at EMO 06 EMO Hannover A 360 degree view Mitsubishi Electric Europe Advertise your Profile! Mitsubishi Electric Europe B.V. German Branch 22 Would you and your company Mechatronics Machinery like to be in the next edition? At full speed into Gothaer Strasse 8 the future Then write to us! 40880 Ratingen · Germany Newport Toolmakers Ltd Tel +49 . 2102 . 486 6120 Fax +49 . 2102 . 486 7090 edm.sales @ meg.mee.com 30 www.mitsubishi-edm.de The will to chill Cryogenic Ltd Gedruckt auf Papier aus nachhaltig bewirtschafteten Wäldern. Contents Contents Contents 30 Mitsubishi MV Series wire EDM cuts the ice at Cryogenic Ltd 38 Japanese cocktails 42 User horoscope A journey for the senses Japanese joie de vivre 06 A 360 degree view 26 Bonsai Mitsubishi Electric at EMO 2013 Big in Japan Mitsubishi Electric Japanese precision 12 Centre stage and behind the scenes 30 The will to chill Interview with Hans-Jürgen Pelzers Mitsubishi MV Series wire EDM cuts the ice Mitsubishi Electric Mechatronics Machinery Cryogenic Ltd 22 Better quality thanks to the 16 A big step forward 34 Environmental protection MV2400S wire EDM machine Productivity and efficiency through investment A change of heart in metalworking Werkzeugbau Kröger Nature and you 22 At full speed into the future 36 Energy-conserving air conditioning 04 Editorial 35 Profile magazine Better quality thanks to the MV2400S wire EDM machine An exciting proposition for industrial companies You’ve missed one of our issues? No problem! Newport Toolmakers Frankfurt Airport 05 Newsflash Ordering back issues and change of address 02 Profile 12.2013 Profile 12.2013 03 Editorial Latest developments HANS-JÜRGEN PELZERS Newsflash Editorial Plenty going on at EMO EMO Hannover: International diversity at the Lifts for what will be Thailand’s tallest One of the biggest crowd-pullers was the fully automated production cell, which world’s flagship metalworking fair building operates dependably unmanned.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Reserve Command
    NAVAL RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS Military Science –1 (MS-1) COURSE ORIENTATION Training Regulation A. Introduction: The conduct of this training program is embodied under the provisions of RA 9163 and RA 7077 and the following regulations shall be implemented to all students enrolled in the Military Science Training to produce quality enlisted and officer reservists for the AFP Reserve Force. B. Attendance: 1. A minimum attendance of nine (9) training days or eighty percent (80%) of the total number of ROTC training days per semester shall be required to pass the course. 2. Absence from instructions maybe excuse for sickness, injury or other exceptional circumstances. 3. A cadet/ cadette (basic/advance) who incurs an unexcused absence of more than three (3) training days or twenty percent (20%) of the total number of training during the semester shall no longer be made to continue the course during the school year. 4. Three (3) consecutive absences will automatically drop the student from the course. C. Grading: 1. The school year which is divided into two (2) semesters must conform to the school calendar as practicable. 2. Cadets/ cadettes shall be given a final grade for every semester, such grade to be computed based on the following weights: a. Attendance - - - - - - - - - - 30 points b. Military Aptitude - - - - - 30 points c. Subject Proficiency - - - - 40 points 3. Subject proficiency is forty percent (40%) apportioned to the different subjects of a course depending on the relative importance of the subject and the number of hours devoted to it. It is the sum of the weighted grades of all subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions Between Populations and Resources
    68 CHAPTER Interactions Between Populations and Resources You have learned in previous chapters that all organisms Engage need resources to live and grow. For example humans 33.1 Shopping for Fish breathe oxygen, eat food, drink water, and do many other things that require resources of one type or another. Although some resources are available in large quantities, all Explore are limited. 3.2 Going Fishin’ In this chapter you will investigate cause and effect Explain relationships as you examine how resources are affected by 3.3 Three Fisheries populations of organisms. You will analyze and interpret data as you look at how populations are affected by the resources available to them. You will also learn about some Elaborate ways that humans’ use of resources is managed to prevent 3.4 Dead Zones overuse. Finally, you will construct arguments supported by evidence for how increases in the human population impact Evaluate Earth’s systems. 3.5 Chesapeake Bay Oysters 69 Activity 3.1 Engage: Shopping for Fish ara and her mother were shopping for groceries one day. Sara had asked if they could have fish for dinner, because she knew fish S was really good for her. They stopped by the fish counter to see what looked good. Sara was hoping they would have her favorite, orange roughy, but she hadn’t seen it for sale in the store in a really long time. They looked at the fish in the case and the first thing she noticed was that there was no orange roughy, so she started looking a little more carefully to see if there were any others she liked.
    [Show full text]
  • Wavelength (October 1981)
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO Wavelength Midlo Center for New Orleans Studies 10-1981 Wavelength (October 1981) Connie Atkinson University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/wavelength Recommended Citation Wavelength (October 1981) 12 https://scholarworks.uno.edu/wavelength/12 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Midlo Center for New Orleans Studies at ScholarWorks@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wavelength by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pipes of Pan Presents ... A best seller. versus the best. icro-Acoustics Bose 301 FRM-3dx *33QOOper patr. *34900per pair Compare these two speakers, and you'd probably expect the one on the left - with the lower price - to be the better seller. You'd be right ... but is it the better value? Before you aecide, it pays to consider how much more a little more money will bu~: Comfare bass. The new FRM-3dx uses a twin-ducted enclosure with thicker cabine panels and larger cubic volume for rich, full bass. Compare highs. The new FRM-3dx1s unique Vari-AxiSTM control system, damped isolated tweeter suspension and rim-damped cone give lifelike h1ghs. Compare warranties. The new FRM-3dx is warrantied twice as long. The Micro-Acoustics new FRM-3dx. When you compare, there's really no com­ parison. Quality worth a 10-year warranty Micro-Acoustics Reg. $349.00 Bose 301" FRM·3dx Tweeter One, fixed. One, rotatable, rim·damped. Tweeter Attached Isolated from SALE NOW directly to baffle.
    [Show full text]
  • Pauls Bay Sockeye Salmon Stock Assessment Operational Plan, 2015–2016
    Regional Operational Plan CF.4K.2015.04 Pauls Bay Sockeye Salmon Stock Assessment Operational Plan, 2015–2016 by Natura Richardson March 2015 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative all standard mathematical deciliter dL Code AAC signs, symbols and gram g all commonly accepted abbreviations hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., alternate hypothesis HA kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. base of natural logarithm e kilometer km all commonly accepted catch per unit effort CPUE liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., coefficient of variation CV meter m R.N., etc. common test statistics (F, t, 2, etc.) milliliter mL at @ confidence interval CI millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient east E (multiple) R Weights and measures (English) north N correlation coefficient cubic feet per second ft3/s south S (simple) r foot ft west W covariance cov gallon gal copyright degree (angular ) ° inch in corporate suffixes: degrees of freedom df mile mi Company Co. expected value E nautical mile nmi Corporation Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • (Vaki Riverwatcher) to Quantify Fish Migrations in the Murray-Darling Basin
    Assessment of an infrared fish counter (Vaki Riverwatcher) to quantify fish migrations in the Murray-Darling Basin Lee Baumgartner, Mick Bettanin, Jarrod McPherson, Matthew Jones, Brenton Zampatti and Kathleen Beyer Industry & Investment NSW Narrandera Fisheries Centre PO Box 182 Narrandera NSW 2700 Australia January 2010 Industry & Investment NSW – Fisheries Final Report Series No. 116 ISSN 1837-2112 Assessment of an infrared fish counter (Vaki Riverwatcher) to quantify fish migrations in the Murray-Darling Basin January 2010 Authors: Lee Baumgartner, Mick Bettanin, Jarrod McPherson, Matthew Jones, Brenton Zampatti, Kathleen Beyer Published By: Industry & Investment NSW (now incorporating NSW Department of Primary Industries) Postal Address: PO Box 21 Cronulla NSW 2230 Internet: www.dpi.nsw.gov.au © Department of Industry and Investment (Industry & Investment NSW) and the Murray-Darling Basin Authority This work is copyright. Graphical and textual information in the work (with the exception of photographs and departmental logos) may be stored, retrieved and reproduced in whole or in part, provided the information is not sold or used for commercial benefit and its source (Assessment of an infrared fish counter (Vaki Riverwatcher) to quantify fish migrations in the Murray-Darling Basin) is acknowledged. Such reproduction includes fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction for other purposes is prohibited without prior permission of the Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Industry & Investment NSW or the individual photographers and artists with whom copyright applies. DISCLAIMER The publishers do not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood | Earth 911
    Good, Better, Best: Seafood | Earth 911 https://earth911.com/how-and-buy/good-better-best-seafood/ Good, Better, Best: Seafood | Earth 911 Gemma Alexander A vegan diet may be the single most effective way for individuals to minimize their environmental impact, but giving up meat is a huge challenge for many people. A pescatarian diet — that means eating fish and other seafood but no other meats — can be a practical step on the road to veganism or even a permanent middle ground between a harmful diet and one that’s hard to maintain. Fish is an easy, healthy protein source that can satisfy the meat craving without triggering (for some people) the same ethical concerns as eating mammals. Environmentally speaking, though, the impact of eating seafood can vary by quite a lot. Here’s how to make your seafood diet as eco-friendly as possible. Good According to Seafood Watch’s carbon emissions tool, crustaceans have the highest carbon footprint of all proteins, because so few are caught from each trip, and because they require so much bait. The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) has a certification for these crustaceans, but none of the certified lobsters and only a few of the crabs get the green light from Seafood Watch. It’s usually good to avoid eating crustaceans. Farmed prawns are almost as damaging to the environment as eating red meat. Poorly regulated shrimp farms in Asia destroy mangrove forests and pollute waterways, can produce antibiotic-contaminated shrimp, and have even been linked to human trafficking. To find responsibly harvested shrimp, look for shrimp certified by one of the three Seafood Watch-approved labels: Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC), Naturland, or Global Aquaculture Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Peggy Parker, William Sullivan, John Jensen, Mark Callahan, Bob Barnett, Carina Nichols
    Halibut/Sablefish Committee Monday, October 28, 2015 Beginning 1:30pm Resolution Room, Hotel Captain Cook in Anchorage, AK Dial-In Information Call in number: 800-315-6338 Alternate Call in number: 1-913-904-9376 Access Code: 60778 Draft minutes I. Roll Call The meeting was called to order at 1:30 by Chair Peggy Parker. Members present: Peggy Parker, William Sullivan, John Jensen, Mark Callahan, Bob Barnett, Carina Nichols Absent: William Rogers, Joe Childers Quorum was met. Others present: Kendall Whitney (Seafood Producers Cooperative), Jane Yao (ASMI China), Jim and Rhonda Hubbard (Kruzof Fisheries LLC), Matt Heres (Revelry Group), Jessie Keplinger (Icicle Seafoods, Inc.), Leah Krafft (ASMI), Kate Krane (Edelman), Michael Kohan (ASMI), Matthew Arnoldt (ASMI), Stefanie Mirseans (Trident Seafoods), Jeremy Woodrow (ASMI), Jack Schulties (ASMI Board), Alexa Tonkovich (ASMI), Arianna Elnes (ASMI) II. Approval of Agenda A. The agenda was amended to add “Whale Depredation” to Old Business 1 A motion was made by Jensen, seconded by Barnett to approve the agenda as amended. The motion passed unanimously. III. Approval of minutes from Friday, November 24, 2017 A. Under Public Comment, item ‘b,’ the discussion of stock assessment was regarding sablefish, not halibut. B. Under Old Business, item ‘a,’ it was added that the discussion on chalk in halibut included mitigating chalk with harvesters and processors. C. Under New Business, item ‘a,’ it was specified that the discussion around farmed fish competition was concerning farmed halibut. D. Under New Business, item ‘c,’ it was specified that the huge recruitment event was for 2014 sablefish, and corrected that the council would set the ABC, then the TAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Keyfinder V2 Dataset © Ibrahim Sha'ath 2014
    KeyFinder v2 dataset © Ibrahim Sha'ath 2014 ARTIST TITLE KEY 10CC Dreadlock Holiday Gm 187 Lockdown Gunman (Natural Born Chillers Remix) Ebm 4hero Star Chasers (Masters At Work Main Mix) Am 50 Cent In Da Club C#m 808 State Pacifc State Ebm A Guy Called Gerald Voodoo Ray A A Tribe Called Quest Can I Kick It? (Boilerhouse Mix) Em A Tribe Called Quest Find A Way Ebm A Tribe Called Quest Vivrant Thing (feat Violator) Bbm A-Skillz Drop The Funk Em Aaliyah Are You That Somebody? Dm AC-DC Back In Black Em AC-DC You Shook Me All Night Long G Acid District Keep On Searching G#m Adam F Aromatherapy (Edit) Am Adam F Circles (Album Edit) Dm Adam F Dirty Harry's Revenge (feat Beenie Man and Siamese) G#m Adam F Metropolis Fm Adam F Smash Sumthin (feat Redman) Cm Adam F Stand Clear (feat M.O.P.) (Origin Unknown Remix) F#m Adam F Where's My (feat Lil' Mo) Fm Adam K & Soha Question Gm Adamski Killer (feat Seal) Bbm Adana Twins Anymore (Manik Remix) Ebm Afrika Bambaataa Mind Control (The Danmass Instrumental) Ebm Agent Sumo Mayhem Fm Air Sexy Boy Dm Aktarv8r Afterwrath Am Aktarv8r Shinkirou A Alexis Raphael Kitchens & Bedrooms Fm Algol Callisto's Warm Oceans Am Alison Limerick Where Love Lives (Original 7" Radio Edit) Em Alix Perez Forsaken (feat Peven Everett and Spectrasoul) Cm Alphabet Pony Atoms Em Alphabet Pony Clones Am Alter Ego Rocker Am Althea & Donna Uptown Top Ranking (2001 digital remaster) Am Alton Ellis Black Man's Pride F Aluna George Your Drums, Your Love (Duke Dumont Remix) G# Amerie 1 Thing Ebm Amira My Desire (Dreem Teem Remix) Fm Amirali
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammals and Salmon Bag-Nets
    Marine Mammals and Salmon Bag-Nets December 2012 R.N. Harris Seal and Salmon Research Project Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 8LB Contents 1 Executive summary 3 2 Observations at salmon bag-nets near Montrose and in the Moray Firth 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Methods 6 2.2.1 Temporal and spatial seal and dolphin activity 8 2.2.2 Assessing the number of seals and their prevalence at nets 8 2.2.3. Comparison with Boddin 1982 9 2.3 Results 9 2.3.1 Temporal and spatial seal and dolphin activity indices 10 2.3.2 Salmonid variability at Montrose bag-nets 12 2.3.3 Assessing the number of seals and their prevalence 13 2.3.4 Comparable data from Boddin in 1982, 2009 & 2010 15 2.4 Discussion 16 2.5 Suggested further studies 19 2.6 References 19 3 Diet of seals at salmon nets 20 3.1 Introduction 20 3.2 Methods 21 3.3 Results & Discussion 21 3.4 Suggested further studies 23 3.5 References 23 4 Appendix A 24 Executive Summary This document reports the findings of observations of marine mammals at salmon bag-nets near Montrose, off the coast of Angus, during the salmon net seasons between 2009 and 2011. Sightings of seals, dolphins and harbour porpoise at nets, prey capture events by seals and dolphins, and the identification of individual seals are reported and discussed. To place these findings in context, we refer to observations carried out in the Moray Firth in 2009 and 2010 during Acoustic Deterrent Device (ADD) trials (Harris 2011; Harris et al.
    [Show full text]