Occupancy Rate of COVID-19 Beds and Availability
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Syria Refugee Response ±
SYRIA REFUGEE RESPONSE LEBANON South and El Nabatieh Governorates Di s t ri b u t i o n o f t h e R e g i s t e r e d Sy r i a n R e f u g e e s a t C a d a s t ra l L e v e l As of 30 January, 2014 SOUTH AND EL NABATIEH N N " " 0 0 ' ' 5 5 4 4 ° ° 3 3 3 Total No. of Household Registered 24,111 3 Total No. of Individuals Registered 109,703 N N " " 0 0 ' ' 6 6 3 3 ° ° 3 3 3 3 Midane Jezzine 9 Bhannine Saida El-Oustani Harf Jezzine 11 15 Bisri 4 Bramiye Bqosta 66 Taaid 203 496 4 Aaray AAbra Saida Anane Sabbah Hlaliye Saida 53 Saida El-Qadimeh 1,068 Salhiyet Saida Karkha 34 Anane Aazour 15 663 Bebé 10,169 94 Choualiq 78 34 37 Bkassine 5 Haret Saida Jezzine 13 Majdelyoun Kfar Falous Sfaray 979 356 17 5 21 Homsiye Saida Ed-Dekermane Lebaa Kfar Jarra Mrah El-Hbasse Roum 5 3 Aain Ed-Delb 147 175 26 77 Miye ou Miyé 356 Qaytoule 1,965 Jensnaya A'ain El-Mir (El Establ) Darb Es-Sim 8 Qraiyet Saida 24 52 403 Deir El Qattine 150 Rimat Zaghdraiya Mharbiye Jezzine 80 Maknounet Jezzine 545 Hidab Maghdouche Mjaydel Jezzine Hassaniye Tanbourit Berti Haytoura 655 70 17 7 Sanaya 84 Zhilta Ghaziye Kfar Hatta Saida Sfenta Zeita 4,683 Qennarit 383 Kfar Melki Saida Bouslaya 41 Jabal Toura 95 Aanqoun Kfar Beit 539 7 485 60 Kfar Chellal Mazraat El-Houssainiye Aaqtanit Jbaa En-Nabatiyeh 83 5 Jernaya 380 Maamriye Kfar Houne Bnaafoul 8 77 68 Najjariye 132 Kfarfila 294 Mazraat 'Mseileh Erkay 144 Aadoussiye 113 49 Houmine Et-Tahta Mzaraat El-Khreibe 489 Hajje 138 Khzaiz Sarba En-Nabatieh Mlikh 12 5 10 Jezzine Roumine 39 Aain Qana Louayzet Jezzine 109 212 28 Aaramta -
Syria Refugee Response ±
SYRIA REFUGEE RESPONSE LEBANON South and El Nabatieh Governorates Saida 568 172 Chouf West Bekaa 152 13 Kassab ! 151 Hospital ! v® Mount Chouf 148 Lebanon ! 712 116 ! 149 ! 1,179 118 ! ! P ! 11,917 ! 147 115 ! 8 ! 117 ! ! Hammoud Hospital P 8 v® 13 ! 10 146 ! University 123 30 Medical Center 172 568 152 151 ! ! West v® Kassab Hospital 111648 150 155 !149 80 33 54 2 ! 118 !! 153 75 18 Bekaa ! !115 117 Hammoud Hospital 80 69 $ !!! ! Health Medic1a4l6 ! v® University 110 32 114 147! ! 116 South 1$142 ! ! Center (prev. ! Medical Center 60 150 155 352 18 Assayran Hospital) v® 253 Saida 4 100 1,010 40 99 7 Hospital (Gov.) !! ! 17 Health Medical ! 140 9 94 v® 141 182 Center (prev. 3 1,010 142 ! 143 ! 103 Jezzine ! ! 104 Assayran Hospital) 324 129 5 145 ! 106 Hospital ! 133 ! 2,190 102 v® Raee 13 ! (Gov.) v® 70 ! ! Hospital Bekaa P 174 40 89 v® 379 ! Jezzine 770 ! ! 81 ! 138 ! ! 4 109 ! 4 135 ! 716 99 31 12 2 108 ! 121 6 ! ! 144 111 4 134 ! ! Rachaya ! Saida 140 113 125 ! 557 ! ! 20 4,250 90 Hospital 132 ! ! 126 (Gov.) P! ! ! ! 156 ! ® v 553 72 661 P Jezzine 2,190 ! P 137 105 P ! Jezzine ! ! 448 ! 128 ! ! P 140 5 142 P 18 30 54 ! 4 ! ! 114 ! 99 ! 136 101 ! ! ! 304 ! P ! ! !P ! 145 143 ! !P! P P 187 110 ! !! ! 6 ! 16 53 ! ! ! ! ! P P ! P ! P 17 97 !! 516 ! ! ! Sour P P ! ! P! ! 5 5 ! ! 37 ! P ! ! ! 198 ! P ! ! 87 !! !! 87 4 P ! 13!1 !! 60 ! ! P! Saida 16 99 49 ! ! ! ! 1,708 -
Layout CAZA Bint Jbeil.Indd
(Tyre) (Sidon) Qada’ Jezzine Qada’ Bint Jbeil Qada’ Sour Qada’ Al-Nabatieh Qada’ Saida Qada’ Hasbaya - Marjeyoun South Lebanon South Beaches Furnished Apartments Bed & Breakfast Handicrafts Restaurants Hotels Natural Attractions Recreation South Lebanon Monuments Table of Contents äÉjƒàëªdG Qada’ Bint Jbeil 1 π«ÑL âæH AÉ°†b Map 2 á£jôîdG Ain Ebel 4-13 πHEG ø«Y Al-Tiri 5-13 …ô«£dG Bint Jbeil 6-13 π«ÑL âæH Bara’achit 7-14 â«°ûYôH Chaqra 8-14 Gô≤°T Deir Intar 9-15 QÉ£fEG ôjO Haris 10-15 ¢üjQÉM Rmeish 11-16 ¢û«eQ Tebnin 12-16 ø«æÑJ Qada’ Hasbaya-Marjeyoun 17 ¿ƒ«©Lôe - É«Ñ°UÉM AÉ°†b Map 18 á£jôîdG Al-Khiam 20-27 ΩÉ«îdG Al-Qlaya’a 21-27 á©«∏≤dG Al-Hibarieh 22-28 ájQÉÑ¡dG Marjeyoun 23-28 ¿ƒ«©Lôe Hasbaya 24-29 É«Ñ°UÉM Deir Mimas 25-29 ¢Sɪ«e ôjO Rachaya Al-Foukhar 26-30 QÉîØdG É«°TGQ Qada’ Jezzine 31 …ô°ûH AÉ°†b Map 32 á£jôîdG AL-A’aichieh 34-49 á«°û«©dG Rihan 35-49 ¿ÉëjQ A’aramta 36-49 ≈àeôY Jernaya 37-50 ÉjÉfôL Safari 38-50 ájQÉØ°U Karkha 39-50 ÉNôc A’nan 40-51 ¿ÉfCG Jezzine 41-51 øjõL Kfar Jarra 42-52 √ôLôØc A’azour 43-52 QhRÉY Mashmousheh 44-53 á°Tƒª°ûe Bkassine 45-53 ø«°SɵH Bteddine Allakish 46-54 ¢û≤∏dG øjóàH Saidoun 47-54 ¿hó«°U Qaytoula 48-54 ádƒà«b Qada’ Al-Nabatieh 55 á«£ÑædG AÉ°†b Map 56 á£jôîdG Arnoun 58-70 ¿ƒfQCG Al-Nabatieh 59-70 á«£ÑædG Jeba’a 60-71 (IhÓëdG ´ÉÑL hCG) ´ÉÑL Jarjoua’a 61-71 ´ƒLôL Houmine Al-Fawqa 62-71 ÉbƒØdG ø«eƒM Deir Al-Zahrani 63-72 »fGôgõdG ôjO Roumine 64-72 ø«ehQ Sarba 65-72 ÉHô°U Arabsalim 66-73 º«dÉ°üHôY Ain Bouswar 67-73 QGƒ°SƒH ø«Y Ain Qana 68-73 ÉfÉb ø«Y Kfarfila 69-74 Ó«aôØc Qada’ Saida 75 Gó«°U AÉ°†b -
“Mouin Al-Taher: Epics of Steadfastness in Lebanon”. Dirasat Filastiniya, No
Khoury, Elias and Michel Nawfal. “Mouin al-Taher: Epics of Steadfastness in Lebanon”. Dirasat Filastiniya, no. 94, Summer 2013 (pp. 85-117).. Translated by The Palestinian Revolution, 2016.1 Who chose the brigade’s name? Jabal al-Jormoq is the highest peak in Palestine. We chose that name because it symbolises the liberation of all of Palestine. Tell us about the 1978 invasion. It became clear that the situation was heading towards a wide Zionist military operation. This was especially the case following the failure of its agents in unifying al-Qleia’ and Marjeyoun strip with Ramish and Ain Ebel strip. This failure became clear after the pressure it applied on the border villages within the border strip failed to persuade these villages to join them. This made the enemy occupy Maroun el-Ras, which is located 940 meters above sea level and overlooks Palestine on one side and on the other overlooks Bint Jbeil, Ayatroun and the outskirts of Tebnine. We didn’t have any forces in Maroun el-Ras as we had an agreement with the two main families in the town declaring the town, like the rest of the border villages, as a neutral area. At dawn on 2 March 1978 Sami al-Shediaq’s forces supported by tanks occupied Maroun el-Ras. As a result Bint Jbeil was under their direct fire. The families started leaving the area and the situation became difficult. If the border villages kept falling under their control and their two strips were united we would be forced to retreat to the out skirts of Tebnine. -
Why They Died Civilian Casualties in Lebanon During the 2006 War
September 2007 Volume 19, No. 5(E) Why They Died Civilian Casualties in Lebanon during the 2006 War Map: Administrative Divisions of Lebanon .............................................................................1 Map: Southern Lebanon ....................................................................................................... 2 Map: Northern Lebanon ........................................................................................................ 3 I. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 4 Israeli Policies Contributing to the Civilian Death Toll ....................................................... 6 Hezbollah Conduct During the War .................................................................................. 14 Summary of Methodology and Errors Corrected ............................................................... 17 II. Recommendations........................................................................................................ 20 III. Methodology................................................................................................................ 23 IV. Legal Standards Applicable to the Conflict......................................................................31 A. Applicable International Law ....................................................................................... 31 B. Protections for Civilians and Civilian Objects ...............................................................33 -
Appeal Tel: 41 22 791 6033 Fax: 41 22 791 6506 E-Mail: [email protected]
150 route de Ferney, P.O. Box 2100 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Appeal Tel: 41 22 791 6033 Fax: 41 22 791 6506 E-mail: [email protected] Lebanon Coordinating Office LEBANON HUMANITARIAN CRISIS – MELB61 Appeal Target: US$ 6,202,300 Balance Requested from ACT Alliance: US$ 3,992,378 Geneva, 13 September, 2006 Dear Colleagues, On 12 July, Israel launched an offensive against Lebanon following the capture of two of its soldiers by the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah. Israel attacked Hezbollah positions along the border with heavy artillery, tank fire and aerial assaults. For 34 days, the Israeli military operations targeted all regions of Lebanon focusing on the South of Lebanon and the Southern Suburbs of Beirut, a populous, popular and overpopulated area. These regions were already considered in the Lebanese context as very poor. According to the official figures there were 1,287 persons killed, 4,054 injured and 1,200,000 uprooted (25% of the total Lebanese population). 15,000 houses and apartment buildings were completely destroyed and thousands of shops and other constructions severely damaged or destroyed. Basic services such as roads, bridges, energy plants and water were also severely affected. The entire agriculture sector was affected as transport of goods became impossible, export has stopped and most foreign labor escaped because of the shelling. To this should be added the ecological disaster due to the shelling and leakage of around 15,000 tons of fuel oil to the Mediterranean Sea leaving fishermen jobless and without any source of income. On July 27, 2006 an ACT preliminary appeal comprising the ACT/Middle East Council of Churches (MECC) proposal was issued to respond to this emergency. -
Lebanon Fire Risk Bulletin
Lebanon Fire Risk Bulletin Refer to cadast table condition. CIVIL DEDEFENCE Please note that the indicated temperature is at 2 meters height from the ground. General description of potential fire risk situation Symbol Level of Meaning and actions risk Very Very low fire risk. Controlled burning operations can be hardly executed due to high fuel moisture content. Normally VL low wildfires self-extinguish. Low Low fire risk. Controlled burning operations can be executed with a reasonable degree of safety. L Medium Medium-low fire risk. Controlled burning operations can be executed in safety conditions. All the fires need to be ML low extinguished. Medium Medium fire risk. Controlled burning operations would be avoided. All the fires need to be very well extinguished. M Medium Controlled burning is not recommended. Open flame will start fires. Cured grasslands and forest litter will burn readily. Spread is moderate in forests and fast in exposed areas. Patrolling and monitoring is suggested. Fight fires M high with direct attack and all available resources. Ignition can occur easily with fast spread in grass, shrubs and forests. Fires will be very hot with crowning and short High to medium spotting. Direct attack on the head may not be possible requiring indirect methods on flanks. Patrolling H and monitoring the territory is highly suggested. Ignition can occur also from sparks. Fires will be extremely hot with fast rate of spread. Control may not be possible Extreme during day due to long range spotting and crowning. Suppression forces should limit efforts to limiting lateral spread. E Damage potential total. -
World Bank Document
The World Bank Report No: ISR6647 Implementation Status & Results Lebanon LB - Municipal Infrastructure (P103875) Operation Name: LB - Municipal Infrastructure (P103875) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 12 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 11-Jan-2012 Country: Lebanon Approval FY: 2007 Public Disclosure Authorized Product Line:Special Financing Region: MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key Dates Board Approval Date 03-Nov-2006 Original Closing Date 31-Dec-2009 Planned Mid Term Review Date Last Archived ISR Date 11-Jan-2012 Public Disclosure Copy Effectiveness Date 29-Nov-2006 Revised Closing Date 30-Apr-2012 Actual Mid Term Review Date Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The objectives of the additional financing grant are to (i) restore basic services and rebuild priority public infrastructure in the affected municipalities and villages, (ii) support local economic recovery and development in the municipalities that have suffered the heaviest damage, and (iii) provide technical assistance to and build the capacity of municipalities to mitigate the impact of the hostilities on municipal finances (within the broader context of developing the municipal sector). Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Public Disclosure Authorized Yes No Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Reconstruction of Public Infrastructure 18.00 Municipal Recovery and Development 9.00 Project Management and Capacity Building 3.00 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Risk Rating Low Low Implementation Status Overview The Project is now complete. -
Updated Master Plan for the Closure and Rehabilitation
Empowered lives. Resilient nations. UPDATED MASTER PLAN FOR THE CLOSURE AND REHABILITATION OF UNCONTROLLED DUMPSITES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY OF LEBANON Volume A JUNE 2017 Copyright © 2017 All rights reserved for United Nations Development Programme and the Ministry of Environment UNDP is the UN's global development network, advocating for change and connecting countries to knowledge, experience and resources to help people build a better life. We are on the ground in nearly 170 countries, working with them on their own solutions to global and national development challenges. As they develop local capacity, they draw on the people of UNDP and our wide range of partners. Disclaimer The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of its authors, and do not necessarily reect the opinion of the Ministry of Environment or the United Nations Development Programme, who will not accept any liability derived from its use. This study can be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Please give credit where it is due. UPDATED MASTER PLAN FOR THE CLOSURE AND REHABILITATION OF UNCONTROLLED DUMPSITES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY OF LEBANON Volume A JUNE 2017 Consultant (This page has been intentionally left blank) UPDATED MASTER PLAN FOR THE CLOSURE AND REHABILITATION OF UNCONTROLLED DUMPSITES MOE-UNDP UPDATED MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................... v List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................. -
Lebanon Fire Risk Bulletin
Lebanon Fire Risk Bulletin Refer to cadast table condition. CIVILDEDEFENCE Please note that the indicated temperature is at 2 meters height from the ground. General description of potential fire risk situation Symbol Level of Meaning and actions risk Very Very low fire risk. Controlled burning operations can be hardly executed due to high fuel moisture content. Normally VL low wildfires self-extinguish. Low Low fire risk. Controlled burning operations can be executed with a reasonable degree of safety. L Medium Medium-low fire risk. Controlled burning operations can be executed in safety conditions. All the fires need to be ML low extinguished. Medium Medium fire risk. Controlled burning operations would be avoided. All the fires need to be very well extinguished. M Medium Controlled burning is not recommended. Open flame will start fires. Cured grasslands and forest litter will burn readily. Spread is moderate in forests and fast in exposed areas. Patrolling and monitoring is suggested. Fight fires MH high with direct attack and all available resources. Ignition can occur easily with fast spread in grass, shrubs and forests. Fires will be very hot with crowning and short High to medium spotting. Direct attack on the head may not be possible requiring indirect methods on flanks. Patrolling H and monitoring the territory is highly suggested. Ignition can occur also from sparks. Fires will be extremely hot with fast rate of spread. Control may not be possible Extreme during day due to long range spotting and crowning. Suppression forces should limit efforts to limiting lateral spread. E Damage potential total. Patrolling and monitoring the territory is highly suggested. -
Lebanon Fire Risk Bulletin
Lebanon Fire Risk Bulletin Refer to cadast table condition. Please note that the indicated temperature is at 2 meters height from the ground. CIVILDEDEFENCE General description of potential fire risk situation Symbol Level of Meaning and actions risk Very Very low fire risk. Controlled burning operations can be hardly executed due to high fuel moisture content. Normally VL low wildfires self-extinguish. Low Low fire risk. Controlled burning operations can be executed with a reasonable degree of safety. L Medium Medium-low fire risk. Controlled burning operations can be executed in safety conditions. All the fires need to be ML low extinguished. Medium Medium fire risk. Controlled burning operations would be avoided. All the fires need to be very well extinguished. M Medium Controlled burning is not recommended. Open flame will start fires. Cured grasslands and forest litter will burn readily. Spread is moderate in forests and fast in exposed areas. Patrolling and monitoring is suggested. Fight fires M high with direct attack and all available resources. Ignition can occur easily with fast spread in grass, shrubs and forests. Fires will be very hot with crowning and short High to medium spotting. Direct attack on the head may not be possible requiring indirect methods on flanks. Patrolling H and monitoring the territory is highly suggested. Ignition can occur also from sparks. Fires will be extremely hot with fast rate of spread. Control may not be possible Extreme during day due to long range spotting and crowning. Suppression forces should limit efforts to limiting lateral spread. E Damage potential total. Patrolling and monitoring the territory is highly suggested. -
GREEN WITHOUT BORDERS the Operational Benefits of Hezbollah’S Environmental NGO
THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ■ MAY 2020 ■ PN79 PHOTO CREDIT: REUTERS Matthew Levitt Samantha Stern GREEN WITHOUT BORDERS The Operational Benefits of Hezbollah’s Environmental NGO On April 14, 2020, two incidents occurred along the Israel-Lebanon border, although only one garnered significant attention. In the widely covered event, peacekeepers from the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) broke up a “short standoff” between the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) in which the two sides pointed guns at each other. The intervention took place just south of the Blue Line marking the de facto international border, in the area between the Lebanese village of Adaisseh and the Israeli village of Misgav Am.1 In the second incident, four kilometers to the north, near the Lebanese village of Kfar Kila and the Israeli town of Metula, UNIFIL personnel trimmed back trees that were blocking security cameras’ line of vision along the border barrier. Four days earlier, Hezbollah media had published pictures of what it called an initiative by Green Without Borders (GWB), a Hezbollah-affiliated NGO, to plant dozens of trees obstructing “spy cameras” installed by the “Zionist enemy” on the border wall.2 UNIFIL acted only because the trees were planted on the Israeli side of the Blue Line, although this territory is claimed by Lebanon. © 2020 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LEVITT AND STERN Recent provocations confirm that GWB is more Lebanon War.9 Jihad al-Binaa’s director-general, than an NGO; it is a Hezbollah front, providing Muhammad al-Hajj, attended the GWB inaugural the militant group cover for operational activities conference, billed “Southern Green Resistance,” and prohibited under UN Security Council Resolutions praised the new group for its planned contributions 1559 and 1701—from conducting preoperational to the overall resistance project.10 Al-Hajj and Nahle surveillance to firing rockets at Israel.