Analysis of Structure on Galactic and Extragalactic Scales

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analysis of Structure on Galactic and Extragalactic Scales ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE ON GALACTIC AND EXTRAGALACTIC SCALES By Qingqing Mao Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in PHYSICS August, 2015 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Dr. Andreas A. Berlind Dr. Robert J. Scherrer Dr. Kelly Holley-Bockelmann Dr. Thomas J. Weiler Dr. M. Shane Hutson ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am most thankful for the supervision of my advisor Dr. Andreas Berlind. This dissertation would not be possible without his mentorship and guidance. I am grateful to the members of my committee for taking time from their busy schedules to help me along this journey. They have all played critical roles in my development as a scientist. I am extremely grateful to my collaborators for all of their helpful suggestions, vibrant discussions and insightful advice on my research projects. I am also grateful to the SDSS collaboration for providing a fertile environment to conduct my research. I would like to thank my fellow graduate students and friends, especially the crew on the 9th floor. Without their support and friendship, my Ph.D. life would not have been so enjoyable, and I would have never made it this far. Finally, I would like to thank my mother Ziqiang Xu and father Lei Mao. They have always been a constant source of support and love throughout all of my pursuits in life. Thanks to Luxi Wang, whose patience, encouragement, and companionship has kept me going. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................. ii LIST OF TABLES .................................. v LIST OF FIGURES.................................. vi I Introduction ................................... 1 I.1 The Expanding Universe and LCDM Model ................ 2 I.2 The Very Early Universe and Inflation.................... 3 I.3 Large-Scale Structure of the Universe.................... 5 I.4 Milky Way Structure............................. 7 I.5 Sloan Digital Sky Survey .......................... 8 I.5.1 BOSS ................................ 9 I.5.2 SEGUE ............................... 11 I.6 N-body Simulations and Mock Catalogs .................. 12 I.6.1 N-body Simulations in General................... 12 I.6.2 Redshift Space Distortions ..................... 13 I.6.3 LasDamas Simulations ....................... 15 I.6.4 Quick Particle-Mesh Simulations and Mocks............ 16 I.7 Summary................................... 17 II Constraining Primordial Non-Gaussianity with Moments of the Large Scale Density Field ................................... 18 II.1 Introduction ................................. 19 II.2 Background Theory ............................. 22 II.2.1 Skewness and Kurtosis ....................... 22 II.2.2 Non-Gaussian Initial Distribution.................. 23 II.2.3 Galaxy Bias ............................. 25 II.2.4 Discrete Distribution......................... 27 II.3 Simulated Data................................ 28 II.3.1 LasDamas Simulations ....................... 28 II.3.2 Mock Galaxy Catalogs ....................... 29 II.3.3 Survey Equivalent Volumes..................... 30 II.4 Results.................................... 31 II.4.1 Dark Matter ............................. 31 II.4.2 Mock Galaxy Catalogs ....................... 34 iii II.4.3 SDSS-II and BOSS Equivalent Volumes .............. 39 II.4.4 Scaling Down to Realistic fNL Values................ 46 II.4.5 Comparison With Existing Measurements ............. 48 II.5 Summary and Discussion .......................... 49 III A Cosmic Void Catalog of SDSS DR12 BOSS Galaxies............ 52 III.1 Introduction ................................. 52 III.2 LSS catalog and QPM mocks........................ 54 III.3 Void finding algorithm............................ 56 III.4 Void catalogs................................. 58 III.5 Void statistics and properties......................... 61 III.5.1 Size and redshift distributions.................... 61 III.5.2 Density profiles ........................... 64 III.5.3 Stellar mass distributions ...................... 68 III.6 Conclusions ................................. 70 IV Alcock-Paczynski´ Test Using Cosmic Voids in BOSS DR12 ......... 71 IV.1 Introduction ................................. 71 IV.2 Alcock-Paczynski´ Test............................ 73 IV.3 Data and mocks ............................... 74 IV.4 Finding voids................................. 75 IV.5 Stacking voids................................ 77 IV.6 Shape measurements............................. 79 IV.7 Cosmological constraints .......................... 83 IV.8 Discussion and conclusion.......................... 87 V Probing Galactic Structure with the Spatial Correlation Function of SEGUE G-dwarf Stars .................................. 95 V.1 Introduction ................................. 95 V.2 SEGUE G-dwarf Sample .......................... 97 V.3 Two-point Correlation Function Measurements . 101 V.4 Fitting A Smooth Galactic Model......................107 V.5 Evidence of Substructure?..........................113 V.6 Summary and Discussion ..........................115 VI CONCLUSIONS.................................117 A List of Cosmic Voids ...............................119 REFERENCES ....................................161 iv LIST OF TABLES Table Page II.1 The estimated survey volumes needed to have a 50% likelihood of de- tecting each non-Gaussian model by measuring the variance or the skew- ness..................................... 48 III.1 Part of the void catalog from the BOSS CMASS North sample. 59 A.1 List of voids in the BOSS CMASS North sample . 120 A.2 List of voids in the BOSS CMASS South sample . 139 A.3 List of voids in the BOSS LOWZ North sample . 145 A.4 List of voids in the BOSS LOWZ South sample . 156 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page I.1 History of the Universe .......................... 3 I.2 An illustration of large-scale structure................... 6 I.3 BOSS DR12 sky coverage......................... 10 I.4 An example of N-body simulations..................... 12 I.5 An illustration presenting how peculiar velocities lead to the redshift distortions (Hamilton 1997)......................... 14 I.6 Smoothed distribution of halos of a 40 h−1Mpc thick slice of the four LasDamas simulation boxes........................ 15 II.1 Variance, skewness, and kurtosis measurements for the dark matter dis- tribution in the Gaussian and non-Gaussian simulations ......... 32 II.2 Variance, skewness, and kurtosis measurements for dark matter particles and mock galaxy catalogs ......................... 35 II.3 The effect of galaxy bias on the variance and skewness residuals of non- Gaussian models with respect to the Gaussian model........... 36 II.4 The effect of redshift distortions on the variance and skewness residuals of non-Gaussian models with respect to the Gaussian model . 37 II.5 Variance and skewness measurements on SDSS-II (left panels) and BOSS (right panels) equivalent volumes ..................... 40 II.6 The probability that a measurement of variance, skewness, or kurtosis in the BOSS galaxy survey can be used to detect a deviation from the Gaussian model .............................. 42 II.7 The probability that a measurement of higher order moments in the BOSS galaxy survey can be used to detect a deviation from the Gaussian model.................................... 44 vi II.8 A comparison of the existing measurements of variance, skewness and kurtosis from SDSS-II data with the measurements from our Gaussian simulations................................. 49 III.1 A thin slice of CMASS galaxies...................... 57 III.2 Distribution of void sizes.......................... 62 III.3 Distribution of void redshift........................ 63 III.4 Distance from void center to the nearest survey boundary compared to void effective radius............................ 65 III.5 A slice through the stacked void...................... 66 III.6 1-Dimensional stacked density profile of voids.............. 67 III.7 The stellar mass distribution of all galaxies and void galaxies . 69 IV.1 A slice of the stacked void......................... 78 IV.2 An analytical test of our method of shape measurement ......... 80 IV.3 Ratio between the measured axis ratio and the assumed axis ratio versus the assumption............................... 81 IV.4 The distribution of the shape of the stacked voids measured from QPM mock catalogs ............................... 82 IV.5 Shape measurements of the stacked voids assuming different Wm . 85 IV.6 The probability distribution of Wm ..................... 86 IV.7 Shape measurements using different size of spheroids .......... 88 IV.8 Testing the effect of squashing in redshift space by smoothing the veloc- ity field................................... 90 IV.9 The effect of the tracer density on the shape of the stacked voids . 91 IV.10 Predictions of how the uncertainty in Wm scales with the survey volume . 93 vii V.1 Sky map of the SEGUE fields used in this study, shown in a Mollweide projection in Galactic coordinates..................... 97 V.2 A selection of SEGUE pencil beam fields in a slice that is perpendicular to the Galactic plane and includes the Galactic center........... 98 V.3 Distribution of G-dwarf stars with distance, along a selection of nine SEGUE lines-of-sight ...........................100 V.4 Dependence of the correlation function on the underlying density gradient103 V.5 Dependence of the correlation function on survey geometry . 105 V.6 The two-point correlation
Recommended publications
  • Set 4: Active Galaxies
    Set 4: Active Galaxies Phenomenology • History: Seyfert in the 1920’s reported that a small fraction (few tenths of a percent) of galaxies have bright nuclei with broad emission lines. 90% are in spiral galaxies • Seyfert galaxies categorized as 1 if emission lines of HI, HeI and HeII are very broad - Doppler broadening of 1000-5000 km/s and narrower forbidden lines of ∼ 500km/s. Variable. Seyfert 2 if all lines are ∼ 500km/s. Not variable. • Both show a featureless continuum, for Seyfert 1 often more luminous than the whole galaxy • Seyferts are part of a class of galaxies with active galactic nuclei (AGN) • Radio galaxies mainly found in ellipticals - also broad and narrow line - extremely bright in the radio - often with extended lobes connected to center by jets of ∼ 50kpc in extent Radio Galaxy 3C31, NGC 383 Phenomenology • Quasars discovered in 1960 by Matthews and Sandage are extremely distant, quasi-starlike, with broad emission lines. Faint fuzzy halo reveals the parent galaxy of extremely luminous object 38−41 11−14 - visible luminosity L ∼ 10 W or ∼ 10 L • Quasars can be both radio loud (QSR) and quiet (QSO) • Blazars (BL Lac) highly variable AGN with high degree of polarization, mostly in ellipticals • ULIRGs - ultra luminous infrared galaxies - possibly dust enshrouded AGN (alternately may be starburst) • LINERS - similar to Seyfert 2 but low ionization nuclear emission line region - low luminosity AGN with strong emission lines of low ionization species Spectrum . • AGN share a basic general form for their continuum emission • Flat broken power law continuum - specific flux −α Fν / ν .
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving the Radio Loud/Radio Quiet Dichotomy Without Thick Disks David
    Resolving the radio loud/radio quiet dichotomy without thick disks David Garofalo Department of Physics, Kennesaw State University, Marietta GA 30060, USA Abstract Observations of radio loud active galaxies in the XMM-Newton archive by Mehdipour & Costantini show a strong anti-correlation between the column density of the ionized wind and the radio loudness parameter, providing evidence that jets may thrive in thin disks. This is in contrast with decades of analytic and numerical work suggesting jet formation is contingent on the presence of an inner, geometrically thick disk structure, which serves to both collimate and accelerate the jet. Thick disks emerge in radiatively inefficient disks which are associated with sub-Eddington as well as super-Eddington accretion regimes yet we show that the inverse correlation between winds and jets survives where it should not, namely in a luminosity regime normally attributed to radio quiet active galaxies which are modeled with thin disks. This along with other lines of evidence argues against thick disks as the foundation behind the radio loud/radio quiet dichotomy, opening up the possibility that jetted versus non jetted black holes may be understood within the context of radiatively efficient thin disk accretion. 1. Introduction Sikora et al (2007) explored the inverse correlation between radio loudness and Eddington accretion rate for a large sample of active galaxies (AGN) including Seyfert galaxies and LINERs, optically selected quasars, FRI radio galaxies, FRII quasars, and broad line radio galaxies. Despite a clear dichotomy in radio loudness between objects referred to as radio loud and those as radio quiet, the data was insufficiently detailed to shed light on the jet-disk connection near the Eddington limit where we traditionally model the radio quiet subset of the AGN family.
    [Show full text]
  • Powerful Jets from Radiatively Efficient Disks, a Decades-Old Unresolved Problem in High Energy Astrophysics
    galaxies Article Powerful Jets from Radiatively Efficient Disks, a Decades-Old Unresolved Problem in High Energy Astrophysics Chandra B. Singh 1,*,†, David Garofalo 2,† and Benjamin Lang 3 1 South-Western Institute for Astronomy Research, Yunnan University, University Town, Chenggong, Kunming 650500, China 2 Department of Physics, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, GA 30060, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Physics & Astronomy, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: The discovery of 3C 273 in 1963, and the emergence of the Kerr solution shortly thereafter, precipitated the current era in astrophysics focused on using black holes to explain active galactic nuclei (AGN). But while partial success was achieved in separately explaining the bright nuclei of some AGN via thin disks, as well as powerful jets with thick disks, the combination of both powerful jets in an AGN with a bright nucleus, such as in 3C 273, remained elusive. Although numerical simulations have taken center stage in the last 25 years, they have struggled to produce the conditions that explain them. This is because radiatively efficient disks have proved a challenge to simulate. Radio quasars have thus been the least understood objects in high energy astrophysics. But recent simulations have begun to change this. We explore this milestone in light of scale-invariance and show that transitory jets, possibly related to the jets seen in these recent simulations, as some have proposed, cannot explain radio quasars. We then provide a road map for a resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • And Ecclesiastical Cosmology
    GSJ: VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, MARCH 2018 101 GSJ: Volume 6, Issue 3, March 2018, Online: ISSN 2320-9186 www.globalscientificjournal.com DEMOLITION HUBBLE'S LAW, BIG BANG THE BASIS OF "MODERN" AND ECCLESIASTICAL COSMOLOGY Author: Weitter Duckss (Slavko Sedic) Zadar Croatia Pусскй Croatian „If two objects are represented by ball bearings and space-time by the stretching of a rubber sheet, the Doppler effect is caused by the rolling of ball bearings over the rubber sheet in order to achieve a particular motion. A cosmological red shift occurs when ball bearings get stuck on the sheet, which is stretched.“ Wikipedia OK, let's check that on our local group of galaxies (the table from my article „Where did the blue spectral shift inside the universe come from?“) galaxies, local groups Redshift km/s Blueshift km/s Sextans B (4.44 ± 0.23 Mly) 300 ± 0 Sextans A 324 ± 2 NGC 3109 403 ± 1 Tucana Dwarf 130 ± ? Leo I 285 ± 2 NGC 6822 -57 ± 2 Andromeda Galaxy -301 ± 1 Leo II (about 690,000 ly) 79 ± 1 Phoenix Dwarf 60 ± 30 SagDIG -79 ± 1 Aquarius Dwarf -141 ± 2 Wolf–Lundmark–Melotte -122 ± 2 Pisces Dwarf -287 ± 0 Antlia Dwarf 362 ± 0 Leo A 0.000067 (z) Pegasus Dwarf Spheroidal -354 ± 3 IC 10 -348 ± 1 NGC 185 -202 ± 3 Canes Venatici I ~ 31 GSJ© 2018 www.globalscientificjournal.com GSJ: VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, MARCH 2018 102 Andromeda III -351 ± 9 Andromeda II -188 ± 3 Triangulum Galaxy -179 ± 3 Messier 110 -241 ± 3 NGC 147 (2.53 ± 0.11 Mly) -193 ± 3 Small Magellanic Cloud 0.000527 Large Magellanic Cloud - - M32 -200 ± 6 NGC 205 -241 ± 3 IC 1613 -234 ± 1 Carina Dwarf 230 ± 60 Sextans Dwarf 224 ± 2 Ursa Minor Dwarf (200 ± 30 kly) -247 ± 1 Draco Dwarf -292 ± 21 Cassiopeia Dwarf -307 ± 2 Ursa Major II Dwarf - 116 Leo IV 130 Leo V ( 585 kly) 173 Leo T -60 Bootes II -120 Pegasus Dwarf -183 ± 0 Sculptor Dwarf 110 ± 1 Etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Milky Way Tomography with SDSS I. Stellar Number Density
    The Astrophysical Journal, 673:864Y914, 2008 February 1 A # 2008. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. THE MILKY WAY TOMOGRAPHY WITH SDSS. I. STELLAR NUMBER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION Mario Juric´,1,2 Zˇ eljko Ivezic´,3 Alyson Brooks,3 Robert H. Lupton,1 David Schlegel,1,4 Douglas Finkbeiner,1,5 Nikhil Padmanabhan,4,6 Nicholas Bond,1 Branimir Sesar,3 Constance M. Rockosi,3,7 Gillian R. Knapp,1 James E. Gunn,1 Takahiro Sumi,1,8 Donald P. Schneider,9 J. C. Barentine,10 Howard J. Brewington,10 J. Brinkmann,10 Masataka Fukugita,11 Michael Harvanek,10 S. J. Kleinman,10 Jurek Krzesinski,10,12 Dan Long,10 Eric H. Neilsen, Jr.,13 Atsuko Nitta,10 Stephanie A. Snedden,10 and Donald G. York14 Received 2005 October 21; accepted 2007 September 6 ABSTRACT Using the photometric parallax method we estimate the distances to 48 million stars detected by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and map their three-dimensional number density distribution in the Galaxy. The currently avail- able data sample the distance range from 100 pc to 20 kpc and cover 6500 deg2 of sky, mostly at high Galactic lati- tudes (jbj > 25). These stellar number density maps allow an investigation of the Galactic structure with no a priori assumptions about the functional form of its components. The data show strong evidence for a Galaxy consisting of an oblate halo, a disk component, and a number of localized overdensities. The number density distribution of stars as traced by M dwarfs in the solar neighborhood (D < 2 kpc) is well fit by two exponential disks (the thin and thick disk) with scale heights and lengths, bias corrected for an assumed 35% binary fraction, of H1 ¼ 300 pc and L1 ¼ 2600 pc, and H2 ¼ 900 pc and L2 ¼ 3600 pc, and local thick-to-thin disk density normalization thick(R )/thin(R ) ¼ 12%.
    [Show full text]
  • The Age of the Galaxy's Thick Disk
    The Ages of Stars Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 258, 2008 c 2009 International Astronomical Union E.E. Mamajek, D.R. Soderblom & R.F.G. Wyse, eds. doi:10.1017/S1743921309031676 The age of the Galaxy’s thick disk Sofia Feltzing1† and Thomas Bensby2 1 Lund Observatory, Box 43, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden email: [email protected] 2 European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Casilla 19001, Santiago, Chile email: [email protected] Abstract. We discuss the age of the stellar disks in the solar neighborhood. After reviewing the various methods for age dating, we discuss current estimates of the ages of both the thin- and the thick disks. We present preliminary results for kinematically-selected stars that belong to the thin- as well as the thick disk. All of these dwarf and sub-giant stars have been studied spectroscopically and we have derived both elemental abundances as well as ages for them. A general conclusion is that in the solar neighborhood, on average, the thick disk is older than the thin disk. However, we caution that the exclusion of stars with effective temperatures around 6500 K might result in a biased view of the full age distribution for the stars in the thick disk. Keywords. Galaxy: structure, Galaxy: disk, kinematics and dynamics, solar neighborhood, Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, stars: late-type 1. Introduction The age of a stellar population can be determined in several ways. For groups of stars, isochrones may be fitted to the stellar sequence in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD; see, e.g., Schuster et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • The Galaxy in Context: Structural, Kinematic & Integrated Properties
    The Galaxy in Context: Structural, Kinematic & Integrated Properties Joss Bland-Hawthorn1, Ortwin Gerhard2 1Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics A28, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; email: [email protected] 2Max Planck Institute for extraterrestrial Physics, PO Box 1312, Giessenbachstr., 85741 Garching, Germany; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2016. Keywords 54:529{596 Galaxy: Structural Components, Stellar Kinematics, Stellar This article's doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441 Populations, Dynamics, Evolution; Local Group; Cosmology Copyright c 2016 by Annual Reviews. Abstract All rights reserved Our Galaxy, the Milky Way, is a benchmark for understanding disk galaxies. It is the only galaxy whose formation history can be stud- ied using the full distribution of stars from faint dwarfs to supergiants. The oldest components provide us with unique insight into how galaxies form and evolve over billions of years. The Galaxy is a luminous (L?) barred spiral with a central box/peanut bulge, a dominant disk, and a diffuse stellar halo. Based on global properties, it falls in the sparsely populated \green valley" region of the galaxy colour-magnitude dia- arXiv:1602.07702v2 [astro-ph.GA] 5 Jan 2017 gram. Here we review the key integrated, structural and kinematic pa- rameters of the Galaxy, and point to uncertainties as well as directions for future progress. Galactic studies will continue to play a fundamen- tal role far into the future because there are measurements that can only be made in the near field and much of contemporary astrophysics depends on such observations. 529 Redshift (z) 20 10 5 2 1 0 1012 1011 ) ¯ 1010 M ( 9 r i 10 v 8 M 10 107 100 101 102 ) c p 1 k 10 ( r i v r 100 10-1 0.3 1 3 10 Time (Gyr) Figure 1 Left: The estimated growth of the Galaxy's virial mass (Mvir) and radius (rvir) from z = 20 to the present day, z = 0.
    [Show full text]
  • The Galactic Thick Disk: an Observational Perspective
    Chemical Abundances in the Universe: Connecting First Stars to Planets Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 265, 2009 c International Astronomical Union 2010 K. Cunha, M. Spite & B. Barbuy, eds. doi:10.1017/S1743921310000761 The Galactic Thick Disk: An Observational Perspective Bacham E. Reddy Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bengaluru, 560034, email: [email protected] Abstract. In this review, we present a brief description of observational efforts to understand the Galactic thick disk and its relation to the other Galactic components. This review primarily focused on elemental abundance patterns of the thick disk population to understand the pro- cess or processes that were responsible for its existence and evolution. Kinematic and chemical properties of disk stars establish that the thick disk is a distinct component in the Milky Way, and its chemical enrichment and star formation histories hold clues to the bigger picture of understanding the Galaxy formation. Keywords. stars: FGK dwarfs, Stars: abundances, Stars: Kinematics, Galaxy: disk 1. Introduction Deciphering the history of the birth and the growth of the Milky Way Galaxy is one of the major outstanding astrophysical problems. Detailed studies of our Galaxy would help to gain insights into the formation and evolution of other galaxies, and thereby large scale structure formation in the universe. As inhabitants, we have much better access to our Galaxy to resolve its building blocks: the stars. The properties of stars that constitute the Galaxy are clues to the processes involved in the making of the Milky Way Galaxy we see today. The observational data on stellar motions and photospheric abundances played decisive roles in the progression of our understanding of the Galaxy.
    [Show full text]
  • Thick Disks and Halos of Spiral Galaxies M 81, NGC 55 and NGC 300
    A&A 431, 127–142 (2005) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20047042 & c ESO 2005 Astrophysics Thick disks and halos of spiral galaxies M 81, NGC 55 and NGC 300 N. A. Tikhonov1,2, O. A. Galazutdinova1,2, and I. O. Drozdovsky3,4 1 Special Astrophysical Observatory, Russian Academy of Sciences, N. Arkhyz, KChR 369167, Russia e-mail: [email protected] 2 Isaac Newton Institute of Chile, SAO Branch, Russia 3 Spitzer Science Center, Caltech, MC 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 4 Astronomical Institute, St. Petersburg University, 198504, Russia Received 9 January 2004 / Accepted 28 September 2004 Abstract. By using images from the HST/WFPC2/ACS archive, we have analyzed the spatial distribution of the AGB and RGB stars along the galactocentric radius of nearby spiral galaxies M 81, NGC 300 and NGC 55. Examining color–magnitude diagrams and stellar luminosity functions, we gauge the stellar contents of the surroundings of the three galaxies. The red giant population (RGB) identified at large galactocentric radii yields a distance of 3.85 ± 0.08 Mpc for M 81, 2.12 ± 0.10 Mpc for NGC 55, and 2.00±0.13 Mpc for NGC 300, and a mean stellar metallicity of −0.65, −1.25, and −0.87 respectively. We find that there are two number density gradients of RGB stars along the radius, which correspond to the thick disk and halo components of the galaxies. We confirm the presence of a metallicity gradient of evolved stars in these galaxies, based on the systematic changes of the color distribution of red giant stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): the Bright Void Galaxy Population
    MNRAS 000, 1–22 (2015) Preprint 10 March 2021 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The Bright Void Galaxy Population in the Optical and Mid-IR S. J. Penny,1,2,3⋆ M. J. I. Brown,1,2 K. A. Pimbblet,4,1,2 M. E. Cluver,5 D. J. Croton,6 M. S. Owers,7,8 R. Lange,9 M. Alpaslan,10 I. Baldry,11 J. Bland-Hawthorn,12 S. Brough,7 S. P. Driver,9,13 B. W. Holwerda,14 A. M. Hopkins,7 T. H. Jarrett,15 D. Heath Jones,8 L. S. Kelvin16 M. A. Lara-López,17 J. Liske,18 A. R. López-Sánchez,7,8 J. Loveday,19 M. Meyer,9 P. Norberg,20 A. S. G. Robotham,9 and M. Rodrigues21 1School of Physics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia 2Monash Centre for Astrophysics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia 3Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Dennis Sciama Building, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth, PO1 3FX, UK 4 Department of Physics and Mathematics, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Kingston-upon-Hull HU6 7RX, UK 5 University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Road, Bellville, 7535, South Africa 6 Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia 7 Australian Astronomical Observatory, PO Box 915, North Ryde, NSW 1670, Australia 8 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia 9 ICRAR, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia 10 NASA Ames Research Centre, N232, Moffett Field, Mountain View, CA 94035, United States 11 Astrophysics Research
    [Show full text]
  • Draft181 182Chapter 10
    Chapter 10 Formation and evolution of the Local Group 480 Myr <t< 13.7 Gyr; 10 >z> 0; 30 K > T > 2.725 K The fact that the [G]alactic system is a member of a group is a very fortunate accident. Edwin Hubble, The Realm of the Nebulae Summary: The Local Group (LG) is the group of galaxies gravitationally associ- ated with the Galaxy and M 31. Galaxies within the LG have overcome the general expansion of the universe. There are approximately 75 galaxies in the LG within a 12 diameter of ∼3 Mpc having a total mass of 2-5 × 10 M⊙. A strong morphology- density relation exists in which gas-poor dwarf spheroidals (dSphs) are preferentially found closer to the Galaxy/M 31 than gas-rich dwarf irregulars (dIrrs). This is often promoted as evidence of environmental processes due to the massive Galaxy and M 31 driving the evolutionary change between dwarf galaxy types. High Veloc- ity Clouds (HVCs) are likely to be either remnant gas left over from the formation of the Galaxy, or associated with other galaxies that have been tidally disturbed by the Galaxy. Our Galaxy halo is about 12 Gyr old. A thin disk with ongoing star formation and older thick disk built by z ≥ 2 minor mergers exist. The Galaxy and M 31 will merge in 5.9 Gyr and ultimately resemble an elliptical galaxy. The LG has −1 vLG = 627 ± 22 km s with respect to the CMB. About 44% of the LG motion is due to the infall into the region of the Great Attractor, and the remaining amount of motion is due to more distant overdensities between 130 and 180 h−1 Mpc, primarily the Shapley supercluster.
    [Show full text]