DOCSLIB.ORG

Habitability Models for Planetary Sciences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Habitability Models for Planetary Sciences 52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2021 (LPI Contrib. No. 2548) 2291.pdf HABITABILITY MODELS FOR PLANETARY SCIENCES. A. Méndez1, E. G. Rivera-Valentín2, D. Schulze- Makuch3, J. Filiberto2, R. Ramírez4, T. E. Wood5, A. Dávila6, C. McKay6, K. Ortiz-Ceballos1, M. Jusino-Maldonado1, N. J. Torres-Santiago1, G. Nery1, R. Heller7, P. Byrne8, M. J. Malaska9, E. Nathan10, M. F. Simões11, A. Antunes11, J. Martínez-Frías12, L. Carone13, N. R. Izenberg14, D. Atri15, H. I. Carvajal Chitty16, P. Nowajewski-Barra17, F. Rivera- Hernández18, C. Brown19, K. Lynch2, D. Catling20, J. I. Zuluaga21, J. F. Salazar22, H. Chen23, G. González5, J. M. Kashyap24, J. Haqq-Misra25, 1Planetary Habitability Laboratory, UPR Arecibo, USA ([email protected]), 2Lunar and Planetary Institute, USRA, USA, 3Technical University Berlin, Germany, 4Earth-Life Science Institute, Japan, 5International Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service, Puerto Rico, USA, 6NASA Ames Research Center, USA, 7Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Germany, 8North Carolina State University, USA, 9Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology, USA, 10Brown University, USA, 11State Key Laboratory of Lunar and Planetary Sciences, China, 12Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC-UCM), Spain, 13Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Germany, 14Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, USA, 15Center for Space Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 16Universidad Simón Bolívar, Venezuela, 17Fundación Ciencias Planetarias, Chile, 18School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Tech, USA, 19Macquarie University, Australia, 20University of Washington, USA, 21Institute of Physics / FCEN - Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia, 22GIGA, Escuela Ambiental, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia, 23Northwestern University, USA, 24Jyoti Nivas College, Bengaluru, India, 25Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, USA. Introduction: One of the problems in astrobiology is through the use of HSMs, their results can be mapped to how to define and measure the habitability not only of the same standard scale (e.g., zero for worst and one for terrestrial environments but also of planetary best regions). A Habitability Readiness Analysis (HRA) environments, from the Solar System to extrasolar of any mission could be used to determine how its planets [1]. The word habitability literally means the existing instruments could be used, or what sensors quality of habitat (the suffix -ity means quality, state, or should be added, for measurements in the spatial and condition). Astrobiologists have been constructing temporal habitability scales of interest. Furthermore, it different general definitions of habitability, not might also be possible to develop new sensors for direct necessarily consistent with one another, for some time habitability measurements. [e.g., 2,3,4,5,6,7]. Other more specific habitability Recommendations for Planetary Missions: Planetary definitions, such as the canonical Habitable Zone (i.e., exploration missions are playing a critical role in our presence of surface liquid water on Earth-like planets), understanding of planetary habitability beyond what are used in exoplanet science [8]. Ecologists have been remote sensing from space can provide. Planetary using since the 1980s the Habitat Suitability Models exploration mission designs for the upcoming decades (HSMs) to study the habitability of Earth from local to may have major astrobiological components that can global scales; however, this is seldom utilized in the directly or indirectly inform the study of habitability in astrobiology community [9]. the Solar System — even if the determination of Here we recommend adapting and expanding the habitability is not the primary focus of a mission. ecologists’ nearly four decades of experience modeling Indeed, general mission components not directly habitability on Earth to astrobiology and planetary designed for astrobiological purposes might usefully studies. These models can be used to characterize the contribute to habitability studies with only minimal spatial and temporal distribution of habitable considerations in design. Here we list four main environments, identify regions of interest in the search recommendations for the planetary community: for life, and, eventually, explore correlations between 1. Increase and widen the participation of more habitability and biosignatures. For example, such experts on habitat suitability models. Ecologists are models would help to test the hypothesis that the experts in the ground-truthed proven measurement biosignatures (or biomarkers) are positively correlated of terrestrial habitability, yet they are seldom with proxy indicators of geologically habitable represented in the planetary and astrobiology environments (or geomarkers); i.e., there is life community. New synergies between NASA and the whenever there are habitable environments on Earth. national and international ecological societies, e.g., the Measurements by past and future planetary missions Ecological Society of America (ESA), Soil Ecology can be combined into a standard library of habitability Society (SES), and the International Society for models. Results from different missions can then be Microbial Ecology (ISME), should be established via, compared, even using different measurements, since, for example, a joint conference session at the Lunar and 52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2021 (LPI Contrib. No. 2548) 2291.pdf Planetary Science Conference. There should be future missions could be compared to each other and worldwide participation to guarantee global their habitability assessments refined, and new standardization. This synergy will stimulate the habitability knowledge gaps could be identified. This participation and exploration of the Solar System as a dynamic standard should be evaluated and updated laboratory for expanding our current understanding of regularly by a diverse and multidisciplinary committee, the habitability of Earth. for example during a Decadal Survey and/or mid- decade review. Currently, the closest concept to an NHS 2. Further terrestrial exploration. Many Earth is specific language included in various NASA habitats are vastly under-explored biologically. For roadmaps, such as the NASA Astrobiology Roadmap example, the clouds, stratosphere, deep ocean, deep ice, [10] and the NASA Roadmap to Ocean Worlds [11]. deep earth, or the mantle. Further, astrobiology needs to These documents stress the need for habitability make stronger connections to the researchers working in evaluations and missions (e.g., Europa Clipper and these under-studied environments (e.g., The Deep Titan Dragonfly), yet only focus on the individual Carbon Observatory) so that there is a cohesive habitability requirements and not how to combine the understanding of the state-of-the-art science being net contribution of these factors. Furthermore, the NHS learned and efforts to continue to study these might eventually become the standard of other environments are supported. These field studies should disciplines. provide new data to test the applicability of current habitability models with extreme environments, and Conclusion: NASA should create habitability standards thus get us closer to diverse planetary conditions. At the for planetary missions with astrobiology objectives, as same time, unicellular life continually surprises us with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service successfully did long new ways to survive and obtain energy from its ago for ecologists. These standards are necessary to environment (rock-eaters, electric currents, and even make sense of data from multiple missions, develop radioactivity) which shows us we need to be flexible in predictions for environmental niches on planetary considering energy sources for habitability. bodies that can be tested, and understand the extraterrestrial correlations between habitability and 3. Improve habitability models. New habitability biosignatures. There is no need for the planetary and models should be developed and validated with field astrobiology community to reinvent the habitability and laboratory experiments, including simulated methods and tools used by ecologists. The synergy extreme and planetary analog environments. The main between the methods used by ecologists and goal is to identify knowledge gaps. For example, new astrobiologists will help to integrate and expand our ecophysiological response curves (e.g., growth rate as a understanding of the habitability of Earth, the Solar function of water activity, a measure of available water) System, and extrasolar planets. for some organisms are necessary, especially in dynamic environments such as gradient-rich biotopes Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the and higher complexity extreme environments (i.e., those NASA Astrobiology Institute (NAI), the Planetary with multiple extremes such as deep-sea brines). Also, Habitability Laboratory (PHL), and the University of there are insufficient models on microbial growth in Puerto Rico at Arecibo (UPR Arecibo). near-surface dynamic environments (e.g., as applicable References: [1] Méndez, A., et al. (2020), arXiv e- to martian diurnal cycles). There is a growing body of prints, arXiv:2007.05491. [2] Shock, E. L., & Holland, literature about the manifold mechanisms through M. E. (2007), Astrobiology, 7, 839. [3] Hoehler, T. M. which life affects the Earth’s climate system, including (2007), Astrobiology, 7, 824. [4] Cardenas,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Composition and Accretion of the Terrestrial Planets
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXI 1546.pdf COMPOSITION AND ACCRETION OF THE TERRESTRIAL PLANETS. Edward R. D. Scott and G. Jeffrey Taylor, Hawai’i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, Univer- sity of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822, USA; [email protected] Abstract: Compositional variations among the spread gravitational mixing of the embryos and their four terrestrial planets are generally attributed to giant 20 impacts [1] rather than to primordial chemical varia- Fig. 2 tions among planetesimals [e.g., 2]. This is largely be- Mars cause modeling suggests that each terrestrial planet ac- 15 creted material from the whole of the inner solar sys- tem [1], and because Mercury’s high density is attrib- 10 Venus Earth uted to mantle stripping in a giant impact [3] and not to its position as the innermost planet [4]. However, Mer- Mercury cury’s high concentration of metallic iron and low con- 5 centration of oxidized iron are comparable to those in recently discovered metal-rich chondrites [5-7]. Since E 0 chondrites are linked isotopically with the Earth, we 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 suggest that Mercury may have formed from metal-rich chondritic material. Venus and Earth have similar con- Semi-major Axis (AU) centrations of metallic and oxidized iron that are inter- fragments, which ensured that each terrestrial planet mediate between those of Mercury and Mars consistent formed from material originally located throughout the with wide, overlapping accretion zones [1]. However, inner solar system (0.5 to 2.5 AU).
    [Show full text]
  • POSSIBLE STRUCTURE MODELS for the TRANSITING SUPER-EARTHS:KEPLER-10B and 11B
    43rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2012) 1290.pdf POSSIBLE STRUCTURE MODELS FOR THE TRANSITING SUPER-EARTHS:KEPLER-10b AND 11b. P. Futó1 1 Department of Physical Geography, University of West Hungary, Szombathely, Károlyi Gáspár tér, H- 9700, Hungary ([email protected]) Introduction:Up to january of 2012,10 super- The planet Kepler-11b has a large radius (1.97 R⊕) for Earths have been announced by Kepler-mission [1] its mass (4.3 M⊕),therefore this planet must have a that is designed to detect hundreds of transiting exo- spherical shell that is composed of low-density materi- planets.Kepler was launched on 6th March,2009 and the als.Considering the planet's average density,it must primary purpose of its scientific program is to search have a metallic core with different possible fractional for terrestrial-sized planets in the habitable zone of mass.Accordinghly,I have made a possible structure Solar-like stars.For the case of high number of discov- model for Kepler-11b in which the selected core mass eries we will be able to estimate the frequency of fraction is 32.59% (similarly to that of Earth) and the Earth-sized planets in our galaxy.Results of the Kepler- water ice layer has a relatively great fractional 's measurements show that the small-sized planets are volume.For case of the selected composition, the icy frequent in the spiral galaxies.A catalog of planetary surface sublimated to form a water vapor as the planet candidates,including objects with small-sized candidate moved inward the central star during its migration.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Science
    Scientific Research National Aeronautics and Space Administration Planetary Science MSFC planetary scientists are active in Peering into the history The centerpiece of the Marshall efforts is research at Marshall, building on a long history of the solar system the Marshall Noble Gas Research Laboratory of scientific support to NASA’s human explo- (MNGRL), a unique facility within NASA. Noble- ration program planning, whether focused Marshall planetary scientists use multiple anal- gas isotopes are a well-established technique on the Moon, asteroids, or Mars. Research ysis techniques to understand the formation, for providing detailed temperature-time histories areas of expertise include planetary sample modification, and age of planetary materials of rocks and meteorites. The MNGRL lab uses analysis, planetary interior modeling, and to learn about their parent planets. Sample Ar-Ar and I-Xe radioactive dating to find the planetary atmosphere observations. Scientists analysis of this type is well-aligned with the formation age of rocks and meteorites, and at Marshall are involved in several ongoing priorities for scientific research and analysis Ar/Kr/Ne cosmic-ray exposure ages to under- planetary science missions, including the Mars in NASA’s Planetary Science Division. Multiple stand when the meteorites were launched from Exploration Rovers, the Cassini mission to future missions are poised to provide new their parent planets. Saturn, and the Gravity Recovery and Interior sample-analysis opportunities. Laboratory (GRAIL) mission to the Moon. Marshall is the center for program manage- ment for the Agency’s Discovery and New Frontiers programs, providing programmatic oversight into a variety of missions to various planetary science destinations throughout the solar system, from MESSENGER’s investiga- tions of Mercury to New Frontiers’ forthcoming examination of the Pluto system.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Use of Planetary Science Data for Studying Extrasolar Planets a Science Frontier White Paper Submitted to the Astronomy & Astrophysics 2020 Decadal Survey
    On the Use of Planetary Science Data for Studying Extrasolar Planets A science frontier white paper submitted to the Astronomy & Astrophysics 2020 Decadal Survey Thematic Area: Planetary Systems Principal Author Daniel J. Crichton Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology [email protected] 818-354-9155 Co-Authors: J. Steve Hughes, Gael Roudier, Robert West, Jeffrey Jewell, Geoffrey Bryden, Mark Swain, T. Joseph W. Lazio (Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology) There is an opportunity to advance both solar system and extrasolar planetary studies that does not require the construction of new telescopes or new missions but better use and access to inter-disciplinary data sets. This approach leverages significant investment from NASA and international space agencies in exploring this solar system and using those discoveries as “ground truth” for the study of extrasolar planets. This white paper illustrates the potential, using phase curves and atmospheric modeling as specific examples. A key advance required to realize this potential is to enable seamless discovery and access within and between planetary science and astronomical data sets. Further, seamless data discovery and access also expands the availability of science, allowing researchers and students at a variety of institutions, equipped only with Internet access and a decent computer to conduct cutting-edge research. © 2019 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-decisional - For planning
    [Show full text]
  • PDF— Granite-Greenstone Belts Separated by Porcupine-Destor
    C G E S NT N A ER S e B EC w o TIO ok N Vol. 8, No. 10 October 1998 es st t or INSIDE Rel e • 1999 Section Meetings ea GSA TODAY Rocky Mountain, p. 25 ses North-Central, p. 27 A Publication of the Geological Society of America • Honorary Fellows, p. 8 Lithoprobe Leads to New Perspectives on 70˚ -140˚ 70˚ Continental Evolution -40˚ Ron M. Clowes, Lithoprobe, University -120˚ of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road, -60˚ -100˚ -80˚ Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada, 60˚ Wopmay 60˚ [email protected] Slave SNORCLE Fred A. Cook, Department of Geology & Thelon Rae Geophysics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Nain Province AB T2N 1N4, Canada 50˚ ECSOOT John N. Ludden, Centre de Recherches Hearne Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, Taltson Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, Cedex, France AB Trans-Hudson Orogen SC THOT LE WS Superior Province ABSTRACT Cordillera AG Lithoprobe, Canada’s national earth KSZ o MRS 40 40 science research project, was established o Grenville Province in 1984 to develop a comprehensive Wyoming Penokean GL -60˚ understanding of the evolution of the -120˚ Yavapai Province Orogen Appalachians northern North American continent. With rocks representing 4 b.y. of Earth -100˚ -80˚ history, the Canadian landmass and off- Phanerozoic Proterozoic Archean shore margins provide an exceptional 200 Ma - present 1100 Ma 3200 - 2650 Ma opportunity to gain new perspectives on continental evolution. Lithoprobe’s 470 - 275 Ma 1300 - 1000 Ma 3400 - 2600 Ma 10 study areas span the country and 1800 - 1600 Ma 3800 - 2800 Ma geological time. A pan-Lithoprobe syn- 1900 - 1800 Ma 4000 - 2500 Ma thesis will bring the project to a formal conclusion in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    A&A 539, A28 (2012) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118309 & c ESO 2012 Astrophysics Improved precision on the radius of the nearby super-Earth 55 Cnc e M. Gillon1, B.-O. Demory2, B. Benneke2, D. Valencia2,D.Deming3, S. Seager2, Ch. Lovis4, M. Mayor4,F.Pepe4,D.Queloz4, D. Ségransan4,andS.Udry4 1 Institut d’Astrophysique et de Géophysique, Université de Liège, Allée du 6 Août 17, Bˆat. B5C, 4000 Liège, Belgium e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 3 Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-2421, USA 4 Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 chemin des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland Received 21 October 2011 / Accepted 28 December 2011 ABSTRACT We report on new transit photometry for the super-Earth 55 Cnc e obtained with Warm Spitzer/IRAC at 4.5 μm. An individual analysis . +0.15 of these new data leads to a planet radius of 2 21−0.16 R⊕, which agrees well with the values previously derived from the MOST and Spitzer transit discovery data. A global analysis of both Spitzer transit time-series improves the precision on the radius of the planet at 4.5 μmto2.20 ± 0.12 R⊕. We also performed an independent analysis of the MOST data, paying particular attention to the influence of the systematic effects of instrumental origin on the derived parameters and errors by including them in a global model instead of performing a preliminary detrending-filtering processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
    WHAT CAN I DO WITH A MAJOR IN …Earth and Planetary Sciences OCCUPATIONAL OVERVIEW: According to the UNM Earth and Planetary website (2013), “Many of the grand challenges for present and future generations’ concern issues deeply imbedded within the Earth Sciences. The human capacity for environmental stewardship, and societal needs for understanding the availability and development of key resources require an understanding of the depth of geologic time and the Earth processes that affect rock, air, and water. Education and the scientific investigation of the Earth, the atmosphere, the hydrosphere, other planetary bodies, and the solar system are central to the activities within the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at the University of New Mexico.” EMPLOYMENT REQUIREMENTS: Extensive job preparation is needed. A bachelor's degree is the minimum formal education required and is excellent preparation for entering graduate school or variety of diverse occupations that require excellent writing skills and competency in research However, depending upon the student’s career interests, some occupations may require a graduate degree (Master’s, Ph.D., J.D.). Consult O*Net for more information on the specific KSAs (Knowledge, Skill, Ability) that are required for this career. THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO: The UNM Earth and Planetary Sciences Department offers many degree options. According to the UNM Earth and Planetary website (2013), “The Department offers a large and expanding variety of introductory and intermediate courses for undergraduate students who are interested in learning about how our fascinating planet works (including an option for a Minor in Earth Sciences). Undergraduate programs emphasize a solid foundation in a broad range of Earth and Planetary Science disciplines, with research opportunities for advanced undergraduates in particular fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Habitability of Transiting Exoplanets
    Draft version October 1, 2015 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 04/17/13 COMPARATIVE HABITABILITY OF TRANSITING EXOPLANETS Rory Barnes1,2,3, Victoria S. Meadows1,2, Nicole Evans1,2 Draft version October 1, 2015 ABSTRACT Exoplanet habitability is traditionally assessed by comparing a planet’s semi-major axis to the location of its host star’s “habitable zone,” the shell around a star for which Earth-like planets can possess liquid surface water. The Kepler space telescope has discovered numerous planet candidates near the habitable zone, and many more are expected from missions such as K2, TESS and PLATO. These candidates often require significant follow-up observations for validation, so prioritizing planets for habitability from transit data has become an important aspect of the search for life in the universe. We propose a method to compare transiting planets for their potential to support life based on transit data, stellar properties and previously reported limits on planetary emitted flux. For a planet in radiative equilibrium, the emitted flux increases with eccentricity, but decreases with albedo. As these parameters are often unconstrained, there is an “eccentricity-albedo degeneracy” for the habitability of transiting exoplanets. Our method mitigates this degeneracy, includes a penalty for large-radius planets, uses terrestrial mass-radius relationships, and, when available, constraints on eccentricity to compute a number we call the “habitability index for transiting exoplanets” that represents the relative probability that an exoplanet could support liquid surface water. We calculate it for Kepler Objects of Interest and find that planets that receive between 60–90% of the Earth’s incident radiation, assuming circular orbits, are most likely to be habitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Science
    Mission Directorate: Science Theme: Planetary Science Theme Overview Planetary Science is a grand human enterprise that seeks to discover the nature and origin of the celestial bodies among which we live, and to explore whether life exists beyond Earth. The scientific imperative for Planetary Science, the quest to understand our origins, is universal. How did we get here? Are we alone? What does the future hold? These overarching questions lead to more focused, fundamental science questions about our solar system: How did the Sun's family of planets, satellites, and minor bodies originate and evolve? What are the characteristics of the solar system that lead to habitable environments? How and where could life begin and evolve in the solar system? What are the characteristics of small bodies and planetary environments and what potential hazards or resources do they hold? To address these science questions, NASA relies on various flight missions, research and analysis (R&A) and technology development. There are seven programs within the Planetary Science Theme: R&A, Lunar Quest, Discovery, New Frontiers, Mars Exploration, Outer Planets, and Technology. R&A supports two operating missions with international partners (Rosetta and Hayabusa), as well as sample curation, data archiving, dissemination and analysis, and Near Earth Object Observations. The Lunar Quest Program consists of small robotic spacecraft missions, Missions of Opportunity, Lunar Science Institute, and R&A. Discovery has two spacecraft in prime mission operations (MESSENGER and Dawn), an instrument operating on an ESA Mars Express mission (ASPERA-3), a mission in its development phase (GRAIL), three Missions of Opportunities (M3, Strofio, and LaRa), and three investigations using re-purposed spacecraft: EPOCh and DIXI hosted on the Deep Impact spacecraft and NExT hosted on the Stardust spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet Exploration Collaboration Initiative TP Exoplanets Final Report
    EXO Exoplanet Exploration Collaboration Initiative TP Exoplanets Final Report Ca Ca Ca H Ca Fe Fe Fe H Fe Mg Fe Na O2 H O2 The cover shows the transit of an Earth like planet passing in front of a Sun like star. When a planet transits its star in this way, it is possible to see through its thin layer of atmosphere and measure its spectrum. The lines at the bottom of the page show the absorption spectrum of the Earth in front of the Sun, the signature of life as we know it. Seeing our Earth as just one possibly habitable planet among many billions fundamentally changes the perception of our place among the stars. "The 2014 Space Studies Program of the International Space University was hosted by the École de technologie supérieure (ÉTS) and the École des Hautes études commerciales (HEC), Montréal, Québec, Canada." While all care has been taken in the preparation of this report, ISU does not take any responsibility for the accuracy of its content. Electronic copies of the Final Report and the Executive Summary can be downloaded from the ISU Library website at http://isulibrary.isunet.edu/ International Space University Strasbourg Central Campus Parc d’Innovation 1 rue Jean-Dominique Cassini 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden Tel +33 (0)3 88 65 54 30 Fax +33 (0)3 88 65 54 47 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.isunet.edu France Unless otherwise credited, figures and images were created by TP Exoplanets. Exoplanets Final Report Page i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The International Space University Summer Session Program 2014 and the work on the
    [Show full text]
  • Pluto's Lower Atmosphere and Pressure Evolution from Ground
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. Meza_Sicardy_etal c ESO 2019 March 7, 2019 Pluto’s lower atmosphere and pressure evolution from ground-based stellar occultations, 1988-2016 E. Meza1,?, B. Sicardy1, M. Assafin2; 3, J. L. Ortiz4, T. Bertrand5, E. Lellouch1, J. Desmars1, F. Forget6, D. Bérard1, A. Doressoundiram1, J. Lecacheux1, J. Marques Oliveira1, F. Roques1, T. Widemann1, F. Colas7, F. Vachier7, S. Renner7; 8, R. Leiva9, F. Braga-Ribas1; 3; 10, G. Benedetti-Rossi3, J. I. B. Camargo3, A. Dias-Oliveira3, B. Morgado3, A. R. Gomes-Júnior3, R. Vieira-Martins3, R. Behrend11, A. Castro Tirado4, R. Duffard4, N. Morales4, P. Santos-Sanz4, M. Jelínek12, R. Cunniffe13, R. Querel14, M. Harnisch15; 16, R. Jansen15; 16, A. Pennell15; 16, S. Todd15; 16, V. D. Ivanov17, C. Opitom17, M. Gillon18, E. Jehin18, J. Manfroid18, J. Pollock19, D. E. Reichart20, J. B. Haislip20, K. M. Ivarsen20, A. P. LaCluyze21, A. Maury22, R. Gil-Hutton23, V. Dhillon24; 25, S. Littlefair24, T. Marsh26, C. Veillet27, K.-L. Bath28; 29, W. Beisker28; 29, H.-J. Bode28; 29,??, M. Kretlow28; 29, D. Herald15; 30; 31, D. Gault15; 32; 33, S. Kerr15; 34, H. Pavlov30, O. Faragó29,???, O. Klös29, E. Frappa35, M. Lavayssière35, A. A. Cole36, A. B. Giles36, J. G. Greenhill36,????, K. M. Hill36, M. W. Buie9, C. B. Olkin9, E. F. Young9, L. A. Young9, L. H. Wasserman37, M. Devogèle37, R. G. French38, F. B. Bianco39; 40; 41; 42, F. Marchis1; 43, N. Brosch44, S. Kaspi44, D. Polishook45, I. Manulis45, M. Ait Moulay Larbi46, Z. Benkhaldoun46, A. Daassou46, Y. El Azhari46, Y. Moulane18; 46, J. Broughton15, J. Milner15, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Mars As a Key to Understanding Planetary Habitability
    Early Mars as a Key to Understanding Planetary Habitability Bethany Ehlmann Professor of Planetary Science, Geological & Planetary Sciences Research Scientist, Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology July 13, 2017 | Midterm Review Planetary Decadal Survey Outline: Early Mars as a Key to Understanding Planetary Habitability • What we have learned and what we can learn about early Mars [15 min] • Suggested exploration plans [5 min] • Questions/Discussion [10 min] Key Discoveries in Mars Science since 2010 *Publication date of last Mars references in V&V • Extent and diversity of potential ancient habitats (lakes, rivers, aquifers, hydrothermal systems, soil formation) • Mafic, Ultramafic, and Felsic igneous rocks • Modern liquid water • Recent Ice Ages and Episodicity of Climates above the Triple Point of Water • Modern active methane, likely with local sources • Modern active surface processes • Modern atmospheric loss rates See also MEPAG report to V&V Decadal Midterm (May 4, 2017): https://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/meeting/2017-07/MEPAG_Johnson_MTDS_v04.pdf Key Discoveries in Mars Science since 2010 *Publication date of last Mars references in V&V • Extent and diversity of potential ancient habitats (lakes, Ancient rivers, aquifers, hydrothermal systems, soil formation) • Mafic, Ultramafic, and Felsic igneous rocks • Modern liquid water • Recent Ice Ages and Episodicity of Climates above the Triple Point of Water [see also Byrne talk, next] • Modern active methane, likely with local sources • Modern active surface processes • Modern atmospheric loss rates [see Jakosky talk, next] Modern See also MEPAG report to V&V Decadal Midterm (May 4, 2017): https://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/meeting/2017-07/MEPAG_Johnson_MTDS_v04.pdf Key Finding since V&V: Modern Mars is active (methane, geomorphology, ice, water) Bridges et al., 2011; 2012 Mass wasting of the N.
    [Show full text]