DOCSLIB.ORG

Topographic Mapping with Fmri

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Topographic Mapping with Fmri Topographic Mapping with fMRI Retinotopy in visual cortex Tonotopy in auditory cortex Topographic maps are ordered representations of sensory surfaces (retina, cochlea, skin) in the brain. Detecting these maps with functional MRI allows us to identify specific sensory brain regions in individual patients. Departure from the GLM ... Recall that GLM is associated with the amplitudes of different components in the measured fMRI signal Today, we’ll learn a new technique that cares about the phase of the signal, using the Fourier transform. It is very simple. Overview: 1) Neuroscience background: visual system 2) Phase-encoded method for mapping visual cortex (use of Fourier Analysis), “traveling wave method” 3) Examples from auditory and somatosensory cortex Background Visual System & Retinotopy Motor cortex Somatosensory cortex Different sensory surfaces project to different regions of the brain retina --> Visual cortex cochlea --> Auditory cortex skin surface --> Somatosensory cortex Motor cortex --> Muscle surface in body Visual Cortex response fMRI whole field stimulus stimulates all of retina, and all of visual cortex map. Background Visual System & Retinotopy The eye focuses light onto the 2D retinal surface at the back of the eye. (the retinal picture) The 2-D array of cells in the retina project in an orderly manner to neurons in visual cortex, creating a 2D cortical picture. (actually multiple times) This is the retinotopic map. Background Visual System & Retinotopy Retina cells (photoreceptors) have receptive fields - each responds to light from one location of visual space. The array of cells are tiled to cover the whole 2D field of view. V1 neurons have a receptive field of about 1 deg visual angle. The array of neurons are tiled to form a 2D retinotopic map. Background Visual System & Retinotopy imaged with high-resolution functional MRI (1mm3) Polimeni et al. Neuroimage 2011 Here is an example of the retinal image projected onto human V1. Now imagine: an image moving across your field of view ... What activity would result in V1? V1 lesion causes loss of vision Lesions in V1 produce blind spots in the corresponding region of visual space. V1 stimulation causes perception of light a thought experiment: what if you could stimulate impossible visual space? It is possible to stimulate local regions of V1 with transcranial magnetic stimulution (TMS) which results in light perception in the corresponding region of visual space. Background Visual System & Retinotopy Wandell, Dumoulin, & Brewer Neuron 2007 V1 is the first and largest visual area in cortex, but there are many more areas V2, V3, V4, ... Each area has its own retinotopic map. If we could identify all the maps, we know the location of each visual area ( locations not known by anatomical landmarks) Retinotopic Mapping with fMRI Dougherty et al. Journal of Vision 2003 Retinotopic mapping can be achieved with fMRI. Mapping stimuli trace out the visual field in eccentricity and polar angle. Color mappings show associated areas of visual cortex. “Phase-encoded” or “Traveling wave” mapping method: Engel et al. Nature 1994, Sereno et al. Science 1995 polar angle: eccentricity: idealized response of visual cortex voxels with blue and green receptive fields: • Periodic stimuli map out visual space in polar angle in eccentricity • Voxel responses are periodic, having the same frequency but different phases • So, parameter of interest is response phase because it tags visual field location “Phase-encoded” or “Traveling wave” mapping method: Engel et al. Nature 1994, Sereno et al. Science 1995 polar angle: eccentricity: Stimulus is cyclical, so response is cyclical how to measure the phase of a difference from standard GLM analysis? cyclical function? 1) key parameter is response phase, not 1) Fourier analysis (phase of a amplitude sinusoid) 2) no contrast, overlapping responses 2) Cross-correlation (phase of a contributes to efficiency of design specified model function) Fourier analysis for retinotopic mapping here’s the actual fMRI time series of a good single voxel. you can see by eye that there are 15 cycles (the stimulation frequency) and we want to know the phase of that signal This is an excellent Fourier problem! The Fourier Transform breaks down a signal into its component sinusoids, giving the amplitude and phase at each frequency. Fourier transform: Any temporal signal (just about) can be represented as a sum of sine and cosine waves (circular motion) of different frequencies and amplitudes. the green oscillation with w=1 has big impact on result, so let’s say its Fourier coeff f(1) = 1. the blue sine wave (w=3) has some impact but the amplitude is smaller: f(2) = 0.13 If we know the Fourier coeff. for all frequencies, we can approximate any function f. Mathematically, the Fourier Series in an infinite sequence of sines and cosines, f(x) = a0 + a1cos(x) + b1sin(x) + a2cos(2x) + b2sin(2x) + ... this describe a continuous function f and the Fourier coefficients can be solved for by integration In actual calculations, we compute the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) in finite dimensions using matrix algebra. (FFT “fast Fourier transform” in Matlab) It helps to remember Euler’s formula, and the Fourier series can be expressed as: where each coefficient Cn is expressed as complex number with a real and imaginary component: Cn = a+ bi Now to get back to our retinotopic mapping signal .... here’s the actual fMRI time series of a good single voxel. you can see by eye that there are 15 cycles (the stimulation frequency) and we want to know the phase of that signal Fourier analysis for Retinotopy (how to in Matlab): 1) Zero center the time series (if not already) series=series-mean(series) 2) Apply Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). Produces array of complex numbers giving FFT the amplitude and phase of each frequency component. f=FFT(series); 3) plot the amplitude spectrum amplitudes=abs(f) bar(0:30, amplitudes(1:31)) 4) get the phase at stimulation frequency n power spectrum peaks at 15 cycles! phase=angle(f(16)) %nth+1 value Finally, plot the phases with a color code, and notice how they change smoothly. Each retinal image is revealed by a complete cycle of phases. Retinotopic mapping with the ‘traveling wave’ has been used to study: organization on function of the visual system So far, at least 18 human visual areas identified based on their retinotopic maps individual differences and perception Schwartzkopf, Song, & Rees Nature Neuroscience 2009 clinical applications in vision loss Baselar et al. Nature Neuroscience 2011 Topographic Mapping with fMRI SUMMARY: 1) Retinotopic maps in visual cortex 2) Retinotopic mapping techniques depend on the phase of the fMRI response 3) Examples from other sensory systems (hearing, touch, movement) Perception! How hearing works: tonotopy Fluid waves + 30dB ! Air waves The cochlea essentially Tonotopic Map performs a Fourier transform. Time-dependent sound information is converted to its Action frequency spectrum. Potentials The map is called tonotopy. Auditory Pathway in the Brain Tonotopic maps in the brain: cochlear surface projects in orderly manner to the brain. In the brain, each neuron responds to a small frequency range (receptive fields) and the neurons are layed out in maps from low to high-frequency response. Sound presentation and phase mapping. 1) Present tones from 88 to 8000 Hz in 1/2 octave steps, in repeating cycles 2) For each voxel, determine the response phase at the stimulation frequency High Human Auditory Cortex Tonotopic: fMRI freqat 7 Tesla Low freq low high frequency frequency tones tones anterior posterior from DaCosta et al. J. Neurosci 2011 The auditory cortex also has a topographic mapping of its sensory surface, the cochlea. these maps are tonotopic with a spatial mapping of the sound frequencies from low to high. so if your were to listen to a frequency sweep this would literally result in a wave of neural response across your auditory cortex, like so. This demo is actual fMRI data that we measured and these are the clearest auditory maps ever seen in the human. You see there are two maps here (high to low, low to high) and they allow us to identify auditory subregions A1 & R which together comprise primary auditory cortex. Human Auditory Cortex Tonotopic: fMRI at 7 Tesla high low frequencyhigh frequency tonesfrequency tones tones anterior posterior • A1is the primary auditory cortex. • Neurons in A1 are hyperactive in tinnitus (animal models) Somatosensory cortex and Motor Cortex Topographic mapping of motor cortex with fMRI used to studying phantom pain and other disorders Zaharia et al. PNAS 2012 You should be able to ... • Explain the principles of retinotopic and tonotopic organization in the brain Neurons in the brain form a continuous map of the sensory surface. Nearby neurons on the map represent nearby locations in sensory space. In vision, the sensory surface is the retina with a spatial map called retinotopy. In hearing, the sensory surface is the cochlea with a map of sound frequencies called tonotopy. Another example, is the somatosensory system which maps the body surface. • Why is the mapping technique called “phase-encoded”? The mapping stimuli are periodic, cycling through sensory space. They produce a periodic response across the brain maps. Different locations on the map will differ by the phase of the response (as opposed to amplitude or frequency of response).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Imaging Retinotopic Maps in the Human Brain ⇑ Brian A
    Vision Research 51 (2011) 718–737 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Vision Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/visres Review Imaging retinotopic maps in the human brain ⇑ Brian A. Wandell , Jonathan Winawer Psychology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States article info abstract Article history: A quarter-century ago visual neuroscientists had little information about the number and organization of Received 5 April 2010 retinotopic maps in human visual cortex. The advent of functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a Received in revised form 2 August 2010 non-invasive, spatially-resolved technique for measuring brain activity, provided a wealth of data about Available online 6 August 2010 human retinotopic maps. Just as there are differences amongst non-human primate maps, the human maps have their own unique properties. Many human maps can be measured reliably in individual sub- Keywords: jects during experimental sessions lasting less than an hour. The efficiency of the measurements and the Visual field maps relatively large amplitude of functional MRI signals in visual cortex make it possible to develop quanti- Retinotopy tative models of functional responses within specific maps in individual subjects. During this last quarter- Human visual cortex Functional specialization century, there has also been significant progress in measuring properties of the human brain at a range of Optic radiation length and time scales, including white matter pathways, macroscopic properties of gray and white mat- Visual field map clusters ter, and cellular and molecular tissue properties. We hope the next 25 years will see a great deal of work that aims to integrate these data by modeling the network of visual signals.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction Among Ocularity, Retinotopy and On-Center/Off­ Center Pathways During Development
    INTERACTION AMONG OCULARITY, RETINOTOPY AND ON-CENTER/OFF­ CENTER PATHWAYS DURING DEVELOPMENT Shigeru Tanaka Fundamental Research Laboratories, NEC Corporation, 34 Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan ABSTRACT The development of projections from the retinas to the cortex is mathematically analyzed according to the previously proposed thermodynamic formulation of the self-organization of neural networks. Three types of submodality included in the visual afferent pathways are assumed in two models: model (A), in which the ocularity and retinotopy are considered separately, and model (B), in which on-center/off-center pathways are considered in addition to ocularity and retinotopy. Model (A) shows striped ocular dominance spatial patterns and, in ocular dominance histograms, reveals a dip in the binocular bin. Model (B) displays spatially modulated irregular patterns and shows single-peak behavior in the histograms. When we compare the simulated results with the observed results, it is evident that the ocular dominance spatial patterns and histograms for models (A) and (B) agree very closely with those seen in monkeys and cats. 1 INTRODUCTION A recent experimental study has revealed that spatial patterns of ocular dominance columns (ODes) observed by autoradiography and profiles of the ocular dominance histogram (ODH) obtained by electrophysiological experiments differ greatly between monkeys and cats. ODes for cats in the tangential section appear as beaded patterns with an irregularly fluctuating bandwidth (Anderson, Olavarria and Van Sluyters 1988); ODes for monkeys are likely to be straight parallel stripes (Hubel, Wiesel and LeVay, 1977). The typical ODH for cats has a single peak in the middle of the ocular dominance corresponding to balanced response in ocularity (Wiesel and Hubel, 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Retinotopy Versus Face Selectivity in Macaque Visual Cortex
    Retinotopy versus Face Selectivity in Macaque Visual Cortex Reza Rajimehr1,2, Natalia Y. Bilenko1, Wim Vanduffel1,3, 1 and Roger B. H. Tootell Downloaded from http://mitprc.silverchair.com/jocn/article-pdf/26/12/2691/1782578/jocn_a_00672.pdf by MIT Libraries user on 17 May 2021 Abstract ■ Retinotopic organization is a ubiquitous property of lower- Distinct subregions within face-selective patches showed tier visual cortical areas in human and nonhuman primates. In either (1) a coarse retinotopic map of eccentricity and polar macaque visual cortex, the retinotopic maps extend to higher- angle, (2) a retinotopic bias to a specific location of visual order areas in the ventral visual pathway, including area TEO field, or (3) nonretinotopic selectivity. In general, regions in the inferior temporal (IT) cortex. Distinct regions within IT along the lateral convexity of IT cortex showed more overlap cortex are also selective to specific object categories such as between retinotopic maps and face selectivity, compared with faces. Here we tested the topographic relationship between regions within the STS. Thus, face patches in macaques can be retinotopic maps and face-selective patches in macaque visual subdivided into smaller patches with distinguishable retino- cortex using high-resolution fMRI and retinotopic face stimuli. topic properties. ■ INTRODUCTION has been recently challenged by the demonstration of small Visual cortical areas are typically defined on the basis of receptive fields in anterior IT cortex (DiCarlo & Maunsell, differences in histology (cytoarchitecture and myelo- 2003; Op De Beeck & Vogels, 2000). architecture), anatomical connections, functional proper- How do the retinotopic maps in IT cortex relate to ties, and retinotopic organization (Felleman & Van Essen, the functionally defined category-selective areas? Neuro- 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Preference for Concentric Orientations in the Mouse Superior Colliculus
    ARTICLE Received 12 Jan 2015 | Accepted 25 Feb 2015 | Published 2 Apr 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7773 OPEN Preference for concentric orientations in the mouse superior colliculus Mehran Ahmadlou1 & J Alexander Heimel1 The superior colliculus is a layered structure important for body- and gaze-orienting responses. Its superficial layer is, next to the lateral geniculate nucleus, the second major target of retinal ganglion axons and is retinotopically organized. Here we show that in the mouse there is also a precise organization of orientation preference. In columns perpendicular to the tectal surface, neurons respond to the same visual location and prefer gratings of the same orientation. Calcium imaging and extracellular recording revealed that the preferred grating varies with retinotopic location, and is oriented parallel to the concentric circle around the centre of vision through the receptive field. This implies that not all orientations are equally represented across the visual field. This makes the superior colliculus different from visual cortex and unsuitable for translation-invariant object recognition and suggests that visual stimuli might have different behavioural consequences depending on their retinotopic location. 1 Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, an institute of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Cortical Structure & Function group, Meibergdreef 47, 1105 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.A.H. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:6773 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7773 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7773 ells in the primary visual cortex (V1) respond optimally to single and multi-units recorded at different depths preferred the edges or lines of a particular orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Organization of Cerebral Cortex
    Functional Organization of Cerebral Cortex Systems Neuroscience University of Texas Health Sci. Center Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences 2019 Daniel J. Felleman, Ph.D. 7.168 [email protected] Outline Concepts underlying the subdivision of cortex Architectonics Topography: vision, audition, somatic sensation Cortical connections: hierarchical and parallel ‘streams’ Cortical Modules Specializations? Color Faces Objects/Places Actions Attention From monkeys to humans: what do we now know about brain homologies? Martin I Sereno , Roger BH Tootell Figure 2 Folded (left column) and unfolded (right column) reconstructions of the left cerebral cortex of a human, common chimpanzee, and macaque monkey are shown at the same scale. The cortical surface was Current Opinion in Neurobiology Volume 15, Issue 2 2005 135 - 144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.014reconstructed from T1-weighted MRI Global architectonics Principles of cortical lamination How is cortex subdivided? • Architectonics: cyto-, myelo-, chemo-, immuno-, etc. • Topography: retinotopy, somatotopy, tonotopy, movements, etc. • Connections: anterograde and retrograde tracers; cortical streams and hierarchical organization • Functional properties of neurons: single cells, circuits, modules, areas • Functional contributions to behavior: natural and experimental lesions Human Architectonics: Brodmann and von Bonin Nissl Myelin Pigment Architectonics continued: Immuno-labeled neuron types Smi32 is an antibody against a non-phosphorylated neurofilament. CAT301 is an antibody against cat spinal cord that labels large neuron types; specifically magnocellular-dominated pathways in monkeys and man. smi32 CAT301 Area V2 thick stripes Architectonics alone is usually insufficient… Quantitative Architectonics Macaque cortical areas identified by architecture after Felleman and Van Essen Lewis and Van Essen Some of the proposed cortical areas of primates shown on a dorsolateral view of the left cerebral hemisphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Retinotopic Responses in the Visual Cortex Elicited by Epiretinal Electrical Stimulation in Normal and Retinal Degenerate Rats
    https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.5.33 Article Retinotopic Responses in the Visual Cortex Elicited by Epiretinal Electrical Stimulation in Normal and Retinal Degenerate Rats Kiran Nimmagadda1,2 and James D. Weiland3,4 1 Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 2 USC – Caltech MD/PhD Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA 3 Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 4 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Correspondence: James D. Weiland, Purpose: Electronic retinal prostheses restore vision in people with outer retinal The University of Michigan, Bio- degeneration by electrically stimulating the inner retina. We characterized visual medical Engineering and Ophthal- cortex electrophysiologic response elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in mology, 2200 Bonisteel Blvd, 1107 normally sighted and retinal degenerate rats. Carl A. Gerstacker Building, Ann Methods: Nine normally sighted Long Evans and 11 S334ter line 3 retinal degenerate Arbor, MI 48109, USA. e-mail: (rd) rats were used to map cortical responses elicited by epiretinal electrical [email protected] stimulation in four quadrants of the retina. Six normal and six rd rats were used to Received: 12 February 2018 compare the dendritic spine density of neurons in the visual cortex. Accepted: 24 August 2018 Results: The rd rats required higher stimulus amplitudes to elicit responses in the Published: 31 October 2018 visual cortex. The cortical electrically evoked responses (EERs) for both healthy and rd rats show a dose-response characteristic with respect to the stimulus amplitude. The Keywords: electrical stimulation; EER maps in healthy rats show retinotopic organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Retina
    Introduction to The Retina A.L. Yuille (UCLA). With some slides from Zhaoping Li (UCL) and other sources. Part 1: The Retina – basic properties • Retina as a camera. • And what else? Input to visual system • input Retina at start of visual hierarchy (V0?) • Retina – no top-down input: connects to superior colliculus (SC) SC controls muscles for gaze control. Purpose of the Retina • Zhaoping Li’s picture. Retina captures image and encodes for transmission to LGN (Thalamus) and then to visual cortex V1. Rapid Eye Movements: saccades, attention • Eyes are frequently moving (several times a second). Movements take between 20-100 msec (10-3 seconds). Why do humans have consistent perception? Figure from "Understanding Vision: theory, models, and data", by Li Zhaoping, Oxford University Press, 2014 Structure of the Eye • Backwards Figure from "Understanding Vision: theory, models, and data", by Li Zhaoping, Oxford University Press, 2014 The Fovea • The density of cone (color) photoreptors • is peaked at the center and falls off rapidly. • Rods (night vision) falls off slowly. • We only have high resolution in a limited region, • Hence need for eye movements. Figure from "Understanding Vision: theory, models, and data", by Li Zhaoping, Oxford University Press, 2014 Retinotopy • Higher visual areas – e.g., V1, V2 in visual cortex have similar spatial organization to retina. Retinotopy. Test by measuring receptive fields (Clay Reid’s lecture). Figure from "Understanding Vision: theory, models, and data", by Li Zhaoping, Oxford University Press, 2014 Part II: Neurons • Real neurons and neural circuits. Figure from "Understanding Vision: theory, models, and data", by Li Zhaoping, Oxford University Press, 2014 Simple Model of a Neuron • Simplest model.
    [Show full text]
  • Retinotopy Versus Face Selectivity in Macaque Visual Cortex
    Retinotopy versus Face Selectivity in Macaque Visual Cortex The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Rajimehr, Reza, Natalia Y. Bilenko, Wim Vanduffel, and Roger B. H. Tootell. “Retinotopy Versus Face Selectivity in Macaque Visual Cortex.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26, no. 12 (December 2014): 2691–2700. © 2014 Massachusetts Institute of Technology As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00672 Publisher MIT Press Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/92520 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. Retinotopy versus Face Selectivity in Macaque Visual Cortex Reza Rajimehr1,2, Natalia Y. Bilenko1, Wim Vanduffel1,3, and Roger B. H. Tootell1 Abstract ■ Retinotopic organization is a ubiquitous property of lower- Distinct subregions within face-selective patches showed tier visual cortical areas in human and nonhuman primates. In either (1) a coarse retinotopic map of eccentricity and polar macaque visual cortex, the retinotopic maps extend to higher- angle, (2) a retinotopic bias to a specific location of visual order areas in the ventral visual pathway, including area TEO field, or (3) nonretinotopic selectivity. In general, regions in the inferior temporal (IT) cortex. Distinct regions within IT along the lateral convexity of IT cortex showed more overlap cortex are also selective to specific object categories such as between retinotopic maps and face selectivity, compared with faces. Here we tested the topographic relationship between regions within the STS.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Modulation of Decision Biases by Brainstem Arousal Systems
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Dynamic modulation of decision biases by brainstem arousal systems Jan Willem de Gee1,2*, Olympia Colizoli1,2,3, Niels A Kloosterman2,3,4, Tomas Knapen5, Sander Nieuwenhuis6, Tobias H Donner1,2,3* 1Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 2Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 3Amsterdam Brain & Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 4Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany; 5Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 6Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands Abstract Decision-makers often arrive at different choices when faced with repeated presentations of the same evidence. Variability of behavior is commonly attributed to noise in the brain’s decision-making machinery. We hypothesized that phasic responses of brainstem arousal systems are a significant source of this variability. We tracked pupil responses (a proxy of phasic arousal) during sensory-motor decisions in humans, across different sensory modalities and task protocols. Large pupil responses generally predicted a reduction in decision bias. Using fMRI, we showed that the pupil-linked bias reduction was (i) accompanied by a modulation of choice- encoding pattern signals in parietal and prefrontal cortex and (ii) predicted by phasic, pupil-linked responses of a number of neuromodulatory brainstem centers involved in the control of cortical arousal state, including the noradrenergic locus coeruleus. We conclude that phasic arousal suppresses decision bias on a trial-by-trial basis, thus accounting for a significant component of the *For correspondence: jwdegee@ variability of choice behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonretinotopic Visual Processing in the Brain
    Visual Neuroscience (2015), 32 , e017, 11 pages . SPECIAL COLLECTION Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2015 0952-5238/15 doi:10.1017/S095252381500019X Controversial Issues in Visual Cortex Mapping REVIEW ARTICLE Nonretinotopic visual processing in the brain DAVID MELCHER 1 and MARIA CONCETTA MORRONE 2 , 3 1 Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC) , University of Trento , Rovereto , Italy 2 Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery , University of Pisa , Pisa , Italy 3 Italy Scientifi c Institute Stella Maris (IRCSS) , Pisa , Italy ( Received October 31 , 2014 ; Accepted April 20 , 2015 ) Abstract A basic principle in visual neuroscience is the retinotopic organization of neural receptive fi elds. Here, we review behavioral, neurophysiological, and neuroimaging evidence for nonretinotopic processing of visual stimuli. A number of behavioral studies have shown perception depending on object or external-space coordinate systems, in addition to retinal coordinates. Both single-cell neurophysiology and neuroimaging have provided evidence for the modulation of neural fi ring by gaze position and processing of visual information based on craniotopic or spatiotopic coordinates. Transient remapping of the spatial and temporal properties of neurons contingent on saccadic eye movements has been demonstrated in visual cortex, as well as frontal and parietal areas involved in saliency/priority maps, and is a good candidate to mediate some of the spatial invariance demonstrated by perception. Recent studies suggest that spatiotopic selectivity depends on a low spatial resolution system of maps that operates over a longer time frame than retinotopic processing and is strongly modulated by high-level cognitive factors such as attention. The interaction of an initial and rapid retinotopic processing stage, tied to new fi xations, and a longer lasting but less precise nonretinotopic level of visual representation could underlie the perception of both a detailed and a stable visual world across saccadic eye movements.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Modulation of Decision Biases by Brainstem
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Dynamic modulation of decision biases by brainstem arousal systems Jan Willem de Gee1,2*, Olympia Colizoli1,2,3, Niels A Kloosterman2,3,4, Tomas Knapen5, Sander Nieuwenhuis6, Tobias H Donner1,2,3* 1Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 2Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 3Amsterdam Brain & Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 4Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany; 5Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 6Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands Abstract Decision-makers often arrive at different choices when faced with repeated presentations of the same evidence. Variability of behavior is commonly attributed to noise in the brain’s decision-making machinery. We hypothesized that phasic responses of brainstem arousal systems are a significant source of this variability. We tracked pupil responses (a proxy of phasic arousal) during sensory-motor decisions in humans, across different sensory modalities and task protocols. Large pupil responses generally predicted a reduction in decision bias. Using fMRI, we showed that the pupil-linked bias reduction was (i) accompanied by a modulation of choice- encoding pattern signals in parietal and prefrontal cortex and (ii) predicted by phasic, pupil-linked responses of a number of neuromodulatory brainstem centers involved in the control of cortical arousal state, including the noradrenergic locus coeruleus. We conclude that phasic arousal suppresses decision bias on a trial-by-trial basis, thus accounting for a significant component of the *For correspondence: jwdegee@ variability of choice behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Retinotopic Structure in Mouse Visual Cortex with Optical Imaging
    The Journal of Neuroscience, August 1, 2002, 22(15):6549–6559 Mapping Retinotopic Structure in Mouse Visual Cortex with Optical Imaging Sven Schuett, Tobias Bonhoeffer, and Mark Hu¨ bener Max-Planck-Institut fu¨ r Neurobiologie, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany We have used optical imaging of intrinsic signals to visualize the indeed correlated with a drop of neuronal firing rate below retinotopic organization of mouse visual cortex. The function- baseline. The averaged maps also greatly facilitated the iden- ally determined position, size, and shape of area 17 corre- tification of extrastriate visual activity, pointing to at least four sponded precisely to the location of this area as seen in stained extrastriate visual areas in the mouse. We conclude that optical cortical sections. The retinotopic map, which was confirmed imaging is ideally suited to visualize retinotopic maps in mice, with electrophysiological recordings, exhibited very low inter- thus making this a powerful technique for the analysis of map animal variability, thus allowing averaging of maps across ani- structure in transgenic animals. mals. Patches of activity in area 17 were often encircled by regions in which the intrinsic signal dropped below baseline, Key words: visual cortex; optical imaging; brain mapping; suggesting the presence of strong surround inhibition. Single- retinotopy; map formation; cortical magnification factor; lateral unit recordings revealed that this decrease of the intrinsic signal inhibition; mice The visual cortex of the mouse consists of a number of anatom- optical imaging of intrinsic signals (Grinvald et al., 1986) to ically (Olavarria et al., 1982; Olavarria and Montero, 1989) and address these questions. functionally (Dra¨ger, 1975; Wagor et al., 1980) distinct areas.
    [Show full text]