Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Plan

A step-by-step approach to rail trail community planning and trail development. “We feel we’re about to see some real trail progress in West Virginia, and specifically Harrison County,”

- Kent Spellman

2 Harrison rail Trails Connectivity Planning Table of Contents

Introduction...... 5 Project Purpose...... 6 Plan Creation...... 8 Key Locations...... 10 Community Engagement...... 12 Proposed Challenges & Solutions...... 16

Shinnston to Spelter...... 19 Corridor Summary...... 20 Community Workshop...... 22 Connection Plan Details...... 24

Clarksburg ...... 33 Corridor Summary...... 34 Community Workshop...... 36 Connection Plan Details...... 38

North Bend Extension...... 49 Corridor Summary...... 50 Community Workshop...... 52 Connection Plan Details...... 54

Lost Creek...... 57 Corridor Summary...... 58 Community Workshop...... 60 Connection Plan Details...... 62

Conclusions...... 69 Key Contacts ...... 70 Notes...... 71

Harrison rail Trails Connectivity Planning 3 “We want people to realize that this project is much bigger than Harrison County.”

- Kent Spellman

“It’s a long, long, long process,”

- Charlotte Shaffer

4 Harrison rail Trails Connectivity Planning Introduction Chapter 1

- Project Purpose - Planning Process - Corridor Analysis - Planning Process

Harrison rail Trails Connectivity Planning 5 Project Purpose

This is a plan to develop four segments of trail in Harrison County that will connect gaps associated with a regional rail-trail effort, and connect existing rail-trails in the County to the network.

A group of rail-trail advocates from West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and New York has coordinated to form The Industrial Heartlands Trails Coalition, and has proposed the connection of a 1,400 mile regional rail-trail network. Harrison County is in a key “hub” location within a corridor of the network that extends from Parkersburg, West Virginia to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. This corridor is known as the P2P Corridor.

The P2P Corridor is approximately 250 miles in length, approximately 200 of which is already developed. To complete the Corridor, approximately 30 miles of proposed trail in Pennsylvania is to be developed and 20 miles in West Virginia. The West Virginia “gaps” to be connected consist of 5 miles in Marion County and 15 miles in Harrison County.

The four targeted gap sections are: - Shinnston to Spelter - Clarksburg Hub - North Bend Extension - Lost Creek to Lewis County

The Shinnston to Spelter Corridor will close a gap in the P2P Corridor by connecting existing trails to the North and South. The Clarksburg Hub trail development will connect existing trails in North View, South Clarksburg, and the proposed North Bend Extension over US Route 50 and the West Fork River. The North Bend Extension is proposed to connect the existing North Bend Rail Trail to the proposed connections of the Clarksburg Hub. Finally, the Lost Creek to Lewis County Corridor will connect the County trail network to points of interest in Southern Harrison County and into Lewis County.

6 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 7 Plan Creation To create this plan, the connectivity planning team at the Northern WV Brownfields Assistance Center (NBAC) identified existing trails, analyzed the inactive railway that spans the gaps between existing trails, and proposed appropriate solutions to connect rail-trails through the gaps.

The NBAC team collaborated closely with the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, the Harrison County Planning Commission, and Harrison Rail-Trails to set the framework for plan development and review the details presented in the plan. Furthermore, collaborating partners engaged the broader community to provide project background and collect community feedback.

The project was completed in 3 Phases: Phase I - Corridor Reconnaissance and Analysis Phase II -Community Engagement Phase III - Plan Creation

Phase I took place in the Fall of 2016, when the NBAC team created maps and conducted a bicycle reconnaissance of the existing and proposed trails in the County. The interactive and printed maps created in this phase include the existing county trails, active and inactive railways, property ownership, and other relevant information. The bicycle reconnaissance analysis was documented with helmet camera footage and photos that were made available to stakeholders in Phase II of the project. On the ground site analysis proved to be an invaluable tool for understanding the composition of the proposed trails.

Phase II took place in January and February of 2017. During this phase, project partners facilitated 4 public workshops to promote the project, present the plan to date, and collect community input regarding the effort. There were also additional meetings with key entities including First Energy and the City of Clarksburg.

Phase III of the project took place from February to May 2017, when the NBAC team compiled information from previous phases and concluded upon the recommendations presented herein.

These photos were taken by NBAC staff during corridor reconnaissance.

8 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Shinnston to Spelter

North Bend Extension Clarksburg Hub

Lost Creek to Lewis County

Legend Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Existing Rail Trail Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, Proposed Trail Connections : NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, County Boundary 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 Miles USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

The Northern WV Brownfields Assistance Center (NBAC), located at West Virginia University, was created in 2005 to empower communities to plan and implement brownfields redevelopment projects. NBAC has collaborated with the Harrison County Planning Commission and other project stakeholders on brownfield project management related to Harrison County railsT since 2013, as the P2P Corridor Working Group assembled. NBAC has been involved in several industrial brownfield redevelopment projects along the corridor in Harrison County since 2005. NBAC continues to collect information and provide project assistance relating to site remediation and redevelopment of these sites. Because the inactive railway itself is a brownfield, NBAC is a resource for assisting with assessment, cleanup, planning and redevelopment process of the proposed trail.

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 9 Key Locations

Wilsonburg Industrial Property

Salem Depot

Clarksburg Connection Hub

Lost Creek Trail Head

Lost creek Historic Trestle

10 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 0 1.5 3 6 9 12 15 : Miles

Legend Existing Rail Trail Proposed Trail

County Boundary Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 11 AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Community Engagement

To collect local knowledge of the areas to be impacted by trail development, NBAC, in partnership with the Rails to Trails Conservancy (RTC), Harrison Rail Trails, and Harrison County Planning Department hosted workshops for each of 4 gaps where trails are proposed to be developed. Facilitators representing each entity discussed the need for workshops in order to include the communities surrounding the trail in the planning process. The project team worked through the details of the workshop objectives, agenda, locations, and advertisement in a number of conference calls and a half-day workshop planning meeting.

Connectivity Plan Connecting Communities to a Regional Network of Alternative Transportation and Recreational Trails Project Workshops The Northern WV Brownfields Assistance Center In partnership with the National Rails to Trails (NBAC) is completing a plan to connect the rail-trails Conservancy, Harrison County Planning, and Harrison of Harrison County that will: Rail-Trails, NBAC is hosting 4 community workshops for local stakeholders in order to: • Provide an inventory of existing trails • Propose corridors to connect existing trails • Educate the community about the project • Identify project next stepsMarion County • Gather feedback on the current plan Harrison County 30 Miles to • Get the community involvedMorgantown in the project Workshop Schedule West Fork River

Meetings will be held from 6-8 pm. Dates and locations are shown below. Light refreshmentsTygart River will be provided.

Shinnston Saltwell Road West ForkBarbour River County Rail-Trail Extension North Bend Rail-Trail Extension

I-79 January 24th, 2017 January 31st, 2017 Shinnston Women’s Club Spelter Harrison County Parks and Tenmile Creek 28 Bridge Street

Recreation Complex Rt-19 43 Recreation Drive Rt-50 North View

Wolf Summit Rt-50 Clarksburg Town Connections February 7th, 2017

Clarksburg CityBarbour Building County 222 West MainUpshur Street County Mount Clare

Rt-19

Harrison County Harrison South Rail-Trail Extension All trail users, neighbors, Lost Creek and interested parties are January 17th, 2017Harrison County Lost Creek Community BuildingLewis County encouraged to attend. 104 Railroad Street

For further information, please contact: Anna Withrow, Project Manager Email: [email protected] Phone: 304-293-7002 National Geographic, Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA, METI, NRCAN, GEBCO, NOAA, iPC Connectivity Planning Workshop Flier 12 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 Miles Objectives

• Gather feedback on the Connectivity Plan development to date

• Inform communities and raise awareness about the importance of rail trails and the potential economic and community development that can result

• Broaden involvement in rail trail development work in Harrison County

• Provide training on, and asset mapping tools for, creating trail-friendly communities

• Create a buzz and build momentum for rail trail acquisition and development

Agenda with Rough Timeline 6:00 Welcome, Meeting Objectives, Agenda Review (County Planning Dept.)

6:05 Introduction of Attendees

6:15 Overview of Harrison County’s Rail Trails, as related to the regional trail network (NBAC, RTC, and HRT)

6:30 Review of Target Area’s Trails, Gaps and Challenges (NBAC) • Introduction of maps of existing and proposed trails • Overview of exiting trail conditions and amenities

6:45 Multi-Disciplinary Team Discussion (NBAC and RTC) • Attendees rearrange into teams by counting off by 4, 5, or 6 • Determine team members’ roles o Facilitator, recorder, presenter, and poster maker • List area trail-related assets • List area trail-related challenges • Identify actions to leverage assets and mitigate challenges • Prioritize actions based on feasibility and impact

7:30 Teams Report Out / Review of Workshop Outcomes and Next Steps (NBAC and RTC)

7:55 Identify who is missing from the table

Outreach The workshop series flier was shared via email with targeted stakeholders in each community, as well as on the Harrison County Trails Facebook and webpage. Project partners also connected with a columnist at the local newspaper who covered the project and promoted the meetings.

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 13 Introductions + Review

• Harrison County Commission welcomed attendees and Several resources were available to gave a brief introduction of Harrison County’s trail attendees during the workshop: planning. • Sign-in Sheet • A few minutes were taken to allow each attendee to • Name tags briefly introduce themselves and state their affiliation and • Trail information packet interests with the trail development. • Trail use survey • HRT membership applications • RTC explained the importance of trail development, and • Healthy snacks and beverages how the workshop was part of greater trail connectivity efforts.

• NBAC gave a walk-through of the trail development process and explained the final products of the process.

• HRT gave an overview of the organization’s programs, accomplishments, and trail development priorities.

A review of the target area’s trails was presented through maps and media including:

• Existing Conditions • Available Amenities • Challenging Areas • Trail Recon Video Footage

With a complete understanding of the target area, the meeting then transitioned into it’s interactive phase.

Multidisciplinary Team Discussions Attendees were asked to count off to be arbitrarily split into groups. This allowed groups to be made up of multi-disciplinary teams, and dissuaded biased groups from being formed.

ICEBREAKER Four jobs were required within each team, and gave team members an opportunity to get to know each other while identifying the right person for each job.

• Note taker: Writes down what was being discussed amongst team members • Facilitator: Ensures the discussion stayed on track per the discussion topic • Recorder: Writes down the team’s identified points on a large sticky note (to be presented later) • Presenter: Presents a summary of the team’s identified points to the rest of the workshop.

14 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning ASSETS & CHALLENGES

The first task given to the teams, was to identify assets of the specified trail section, which could include:

• elements of the trail itself • positive impacts of the trail • features that may have positive impacts on the trail

The second task was the identify challenges of the specified trail section which could include:

• issues with the trail development process, • current issues relating to the trail

SOLUTIONS & FEASIBILITY

The next task was to identify actions and solutions to leverage assets and mitigate challenges.

• If a problem was identified, a solution should be identified • These solutions were written onto small post-it

CONCLUSIONS

Groups presented a summary including the most important: • assets • challenges • solutions • feasibility matrix - most impactful - most feasible

Participants were posed the question, “Who is missing from this conversation?”. From this, people and entities were identified as who should be contacted and involved in the development and planning process.

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 15 Proposed Challenges & Solutions

Throughout the process, several common issues were identified along the corridors. Some of these include: • Weathered Bridges • Road Crossings • Private Properties

Because industrial development, including railroads, oftentimes took place alongside waterways, many of the trail corridor segments are parallel to and intersect with rivers and their tributaries. There are several trestle bridges that intersect the corridor, in various conditions, that must be retrofitted or rebuilt.

The proposed trail also has several intersections with small neighborhood roads and a few intersections with more substantial county roads. In these cases, a plan depicting the location and type of signage is presented for each location. Proposed solutions in the plan include: Road warning sign for trail users, trail warning sign for road traffic 200 feet away, trail crossing yield sign for road traffic, and crosswalks perpendicular to the road for trail user crossing safety.

In some locations, the inactive railway bisects private properties as a 40 foot wide right- of-way. In these locations, title research is needed to determine property ownership. Depending on the results of title searches, negotiations and/or coordination with private property owners is needed.

Applications of these elements and additional site-specific recommendations are outlined in the development plans for each targeted gap section.

16 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 17 "Bringing the community out in the spirit of the rail trails and the spirit of community."

-Diana Druga

“We want to try and open a dialogue with the community and see what steps we might be able to take to work with citizens and close these gaps.”

- Anna WIthrow

18 Harrison rail Trails Connectivity Planning Shinnston to Spelter Chapter 2

- Corridor Summary - Community Workshop - Connection Plan Details

Harrison rail Trails Connectivity Planning 19 Corridor Summary

Shinnston Extension Corridor

A segment of the inactive rail corridor is currently owned by First Energy and intersects a residential community. Trail development planning with stakeholders including First Energy and neighborhood residents is needed.

Across Shinnston Route Suggestion

Management at Harrison Power Station suggested routing the trail through private property to avoid the power station.

Private Properties

The inactive rail corridor bisects several private parcels.

Meadowbrook Connection

A route through or around The Designers Garden Center is needed, and the existing trestle bridge needs repairs.

20 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Shinnston to Spelter Master Connections Map

0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 : Miles

Legend Existing Rail Trail Proposed Trail Alternative Route TBA Proposed Bridges Active Railway

Inactive Railway

Harrison County Parcels Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 21 Community Workshop

The Shinnston workshop focused on the gap from the West Fork River Trail trail head in Shinnston to the terminating point of the Harrison North trail in Spelter. The majority of proposed trail in this gap is on remote, abandoned rail corridor, with a bridge in need of reconstruction and an alignment to be determined around Harrison Power Station and a major vehicular thoroughfare.

Number of Attendees - 26

Groups Represented - Harrison Rail Trails, Harrison County Planning, National Rails to Trails Conservancy, City of Shinnston, First Energy Corp., Local Businesses (Pike Street Bikes, Gillum House Bed & Breakfast) Frequently used words for proposed trail assets

Assets Many groups mentioned the benefits of having more tourism and the economic benefits for local businesses, such as Pike Street Bikes and the Gillum House Bed & Breakfast that are situated adjacent to the trail corridor. Participants also identified the opportunity to connect to recreational areas such as the West Fork River Trail and Lincoln High School’s recreational fields. Additionally, the possible connections involving youth programming and education was mentioned in most groups. Some groups discussed that the trail will provide access to the remote town of Gypsy. All the groups recognized the trail corridor as playing a part in increasing the health and wellbeing of the people of Shinnston, Gypsy, and Spelter.

22 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Challenges A key challenge that every group identified was the issue involving property ownership. Related was the need to educate people about the trail and its assets for the community. Shinnston community members expressed concern about trail safety and property owner cooperation near Harrison Power Station and near Highways 19 and 20. Locating and developing access points and parking areas was also a concern, as well as trail maintenance funding.

Suggested Solutions Each group identified solutions for the issue of funding. Several groups came up with an idea of local incentive- Frequently used words for proposed trail challenges sponsorship relationship, where local businesses could be more involved in trail development by providing materials and services. Additionally, groups mentioned leveraging the trail as a means of spurring recreational and economic development. It was also proposed to provide county tax incentives to property owners who would allow trail development through their property. Education of trail benefits was identified as a way to involve Shinnston, Gypsy, and Spelter communities, as well as engage community members. The schools adjacent to the trail corridor were identified as being a good connection for youth and programming. Finally, specific trail regulations need to be identified and enforced.

Who is Missing EQT, other local businesses, local churches, fire department, law enforcement, schools, Board of Education, parents, kids, teachers

Frequently used words for proposed trail solutions

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 23 Connection Plan Details

Shinnston Extension Corridor The West Fork River Trail currently terminates at a trailhead park in Shinnston. The proposed Shinnston Extension Corridor will continue South on the inactive railway adjacent to an abandoned Dairy Queen. The railway parcel adjacent to the Dairy Queen is privately owned. First Energy owns a segment of the inactive rail corridor that extends from the privately owned parcel to the Harrison Power Station.

The suggested route is to continue the trail south of its existing terminus, through the private property, and First Energy Property. To avoid Harrison Power Station, a route around, such as the one shown, is suggested.

Additional site reconnaissance as well as negotiations with public and private property owners are needed.

West Fork River Trail Endpoint

Crossing Perspective

24 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Miles West Fork River : Trail Endpoint

Smith, Diane Vincent & Louis G.

First Energy

Radtka, Ryan C.

First Energy

Legend Existing Rail Trail Proposed Trail Proposed Route - Alignment TBD

Inactive Railway

Harrison County Parcels Spagnulo, Anthony L. & Pamela K.

Crossing Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, Perspective NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 25 Across Shinnston Route Suggestion

0 0.0175 0.035 0.07 0.105 0.14 0.175 Shinnston: to Spelter Miles

The alternate route is suggested to follow an existing utility corridor from the inactive railway to Cervullo Road, before

Legend crossing WV Route 20 and passing through a residential Proposed Trail area to rejoin the inactive railway to the south. Shinnston Trail Connection - Alignment TBD Trail Crossing Yield Sign Trail Ahead Warning Sign

Inactive Railway Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, Harrison County Parcels NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

26 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Gypsy Properties

0 112.5 225 450 675 900 Feet :

Brewer, Sally

Thomas, Charlotte M.

Gross, Lieda Marie

Smith, Robert J. & Kimberly S.

Binegar, Donnie L. & Frances

Crayton, Robert W. & Jessie C

Gross, Lieda Marie

Gherke, Christopher W & Michelle N.

The inactive railway bisects several properties in Gypsy. Parcels were previously divided into separate parcels on either side of the corridor. It is unknown if the corridor property, which was previously controlled Legend by CSX Industries has been divested back to private property or if it remains in public ownership. Private Proposed Trail property owners appear to be maintaining the corridor Inactive Railway and have in some cases displayed “No Trespassing” Harrison County Parcels signage.

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 27 Simpson Creek - Meadowbrook Crossing

West Fork River : Alternate Route, Alignment TBD

Larosa, James D. R o

Bell, Robert D. u

Elk Creek 9

Wageman, Darrell M. Larosa, James D.

McCauley, Charles W.

Kupfner, Patricia Ann Skidmore, Anthony Wayne Enlarged Hepzibah Public

Larosa, James D. No tax parcel data available Consolidation Coal Co. Flanigan, Karen J.

United International Inc. Garden Center Crossing Detail Cattaneo, Leonard Jr. Hurst, Pamela J.

Larosa, James D.

Frum, Melissa

Legend Proposed Trail Proposed Alternative Route Proposed Bridges Trail Crossing Yield Sign Trail Ahead Warning Sign Inactive Railway 0 120 240 480 720 960 1,200 Feet Harrison County Parcels Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

28 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Alternate Route Perspective

West Fork River :

Larosa, James D. R o

Bell, Robert D. u

Elk Creek 9

Wageman, Darrell M. Larosa, James D.

Garden Center McCauley, Charles W. Crossing Perspective Kupfner, Patricia Ann Skidmore, Anthony Wayne Enlarged Hepzibah Public

Larosa, James D. No tax parcel data available Consolidation Coal Co. Flanigan, Karen J.

United International Inc. Garden Center Crossing Detail Cattaneo, Leonard Jr. Hurst, Pamela J.

Larosa, James D.

Frum, Melissa

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 29 Garden Center Crossing Perspective

Garden Center Crossing Detail

30 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Alternate Route Perspective

If reassembling the corridor through the garden center development is infeasible, a board walk along the West Fork may be constructed to achieve connectivity through Meadowbrook.

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 31 “I think there’s a lot of momentum in the region for building this trail system and moving this forward after it’s been somewhat stagnant for a number of years. We’ve got the right people and partners in place, and I think it’s very doable. This is not a quick process. It takes many years and a lot of different grant applications and funding proposals to get the pieces put together, but you’ve got to have that excitement and momentum to get it going.”

- Kent Spellman

"I'm just so proud of our community and it's just such a pleasure. Harrison County Commissioners are doing a wonderful job in supporting out Harrison County Rail Trails North & South."

- Diana Druga

“This was an informative event where the public could brainstorm and provide feedback on ways to bridge the various Rails to Trails gaps.”

- Charlotte Shaffer

32 Harrison rail Trails Connectivity Planning Clarksburg Chapter 3

- Corridor Summary - Community Workshop - Connection Plan Details

Harrison rail Trails Connectivity Planning 33 Corridor Summary

In addition to typical trail surfacing and access improvements, to achieve trail connectivity through Clarksburg, the following developments are needed:

• Earthwork and erosion control at the Land Slip Area • 4 bridges - Reconstructed on abutments over Route 50 - Retrofitted over active CSX line - Constructed over the West Fork River - Retrofitted over Elk Creek • Potential switchback engineering and development to proposed bridge over West Fork River • Pedestrian safety and traffic calming

Fourco to Route 50 - A section of the abandoned rail-line corridor has serious erosion damage. Falling rock and loose soil line the corridor where the hillside has cut in. Stabilization techniques need to be addressed.

Connection Hub Area -

A major transitional area, connecting the Harrison North, Harrison South, and North Bend Extension rail trails, is adjacent to the north of the old Anchor Hocking Glass property. This area is one of the more challenging gap connections due to the need for three bridges, change in topography, and navigating around existing infrastructure. Completing this connection hub is a key component to

Downtown Trestle Bridge and Pedestrian Crossing The abandoned rail corridor passes over Elk Creek; the existing bridge may prove structurally sound and useful for future gap connections. The inactive rail corridor passes through a major road intersection along the edge of Downtown Clarksburg before crossing through a commercial parking lot. Pedestrian safety and connections to local businesses are needed in this area.

34 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Clarksburg Town Master Connections Map :

Northview

Adamston

Legend Existing Rail Trail Proposed Trail Downtown Propsed Alternative Route Proposed Bridges Active Railway 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Miles Inactive Railway Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Harrison County Parcels Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 35 Community Workshop

The Clarksburg workshop focused on proposed trails through the City to connect Harrison South, the North Bend, and North View Rail-Trails. The proposed trail will connect trails to the City’s Downtown. There are 3 proposed bridges in this section and a stretch that will run adjacent to an active rail-line.

Number of Attendees - 25

Groups Represented - Harrison Rail Trails, Harrison County Planning, National Rails to Trails Conservancy, national parks Service, West Virginia University, City of Clarksburg, Downstream Strategies, Salem University, Fusion Technologies LLC. Frequently used words for proposed trail assets

Assets They key asset identified amongst groups was the capability of the trail to be an alternative transportation connection. Participants recognized that the proposed trail will provide pedestrian and bicycle access between Adamston, North View, and Downtown neighborhoods, as well as commercial areas, employment centers, and surrounding rural areas. The groups saw the trail as an opportunity get community members more involved in healthy activities such as walking, running, bike riding, and a variety of other exercises. Groups stressed the importance of family involvement and friendly experiences. Tourism and local business growth was also noted as being an asset affected by the trail hub development. Connecting the three county trails would allow longer trail trips, attracting more trail users.

Challenges Issues that were mentioned in every group were land acquisition and funding for connection development. Other issues included the need for bridges to be constructed across

36 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning the West Fork River, an active rail- line, and Route 50. Folks expressed concern related to potential soil contamination from the former Anchor Hocking Glass Factory. Participants mentioned the need for regulations and enforcement of ATVs and other vehicles that currently use the trail. The repair of the land slip on the north side of Route 50 was also recognized as a physical challenge. The groups identified trail awareness, community support, social outreach, ongoing trail maintenance, and safety patrolling as priorities for trail development.

Suggested Solutions All of the groups mentioned fundraising through local businesses, Frequently used words for proposed trail challenges such as sponsorships and donations from businesses and organizations. Schools and youth groups were identified as a good place to receive involvement and increased awareness. To further planning and capacity building, neighborhood meetings at a local business were suggested. Various activities and programs were suggested as a way to increase awareness while possibly raising funds. Solutions for physical problems included bollards to prevent unauthorized vehicular use, and cleanups to maintain trail integrity.

Who is Missing Media, healthcare, insurance companies, universities, churches, YMCA, local clubs, schools, scouts, senior center, local businesses, oil and gas sponsors, friends, humane society, elected officials, law enforcement, neighborhood watch groups, sportsmen, veterans, Master Gardeners, and Master Naturalists

Frequently used words for proposed trail solutions

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 37 Connection Plan Details

Fourco to Route 50

Slip Section

Falling Rock Hazard

Photo credit: Cardno Native Plant Nursery

Transportation Corridor Section

Section

1:20 38 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning ClarksburgFormer Fourco Glass Factory North View Rail Trail is proposed to extend south from the existing endpoint by the Fourco Glass property. The inactive rail line is along the contours of a slope alongside the North : View neighborhood. A portion of the corridor is obstructed by a significant land slip. Earthwork and erosion prevention measures, such as those pictured are needed for trail development.

An alternate trail route, avoiding the Land Slip Area, may be determined through private property alongside the West Fork River.

Slip Section Photo credit: Cardno Native Plant Nursery

Transportation Corridor Section Legend Proposed Trail Proposed Alternative Route Slip Area 0 112.5 225 450 675 900 Inactive Railway Feet Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Harrison County Parcels Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 39 0 120 240 480 720 960 1,200 Feet :

Connection Hub Area

0 120 240 480 720 960 1,200 Clarksburg Feet

To Harrison North Rail-Trail :

Possible alternate trail route through private Three Bridges property, alignment TBD Perspective

West Fork Crossing Section

Route 50 Hub Crossing Section West Fork River Perspective

Harrison Services LLC

Legend CSX Transportation Inc Proposed Trail Proposed Route - Alignment TBD Proposed Bridges Former Anchor Hocking Active Railway Glass Factory Inactive RailHwaaryrison Services LLC To Downtown Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Harrison CountTrestley Parc eBridgels Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Es500ri (Th aFTiland), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

Entry from North Bend Extension CSX Transportation Inc Inactive Rail Bridge Legend Proposed Trail Proposed Route - Alignment TBD Proposed Bridges Active Railway

Hub CrossingInactiv eSection Railway - Existing Conditions Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Harrison County Parcels Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDActiveA, USGS CSX, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Rail line

40 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Connecting the gap between Harrison North and Harrison South will require two bridges over an active CSX rail-line and US Route 50. Currently, the deteriorated remnants of a rail-line bridge span over the CSX rail corridor. This old bridge connects to a knoll about 60 feet in diameter; the knoll is situated between the CSX rail-line and US Route 50. The abutments of a second bridge remain on each side of Route 50. A pedestrian bridge, such as the one pictured below, allowing adequate clearance for truck traffic, may be constructed on the existing abutments.

AERIAL:

95’ +/-

EXISTING:

EAST BOUND WEST BOUND

Photo Credit: The Thrasher Group, Inc. Proposed Pedestrian Bridge

Remaining Abutments

US Route 50

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 41 West Fork River Crossing

The North Bend Rail Trail extension, coming through Adamston, requires a bridge over the West Fork River in order to connect to the Harrison South Rail-Trail. Closing this gap will also require an efficient way to address the change in elevation from Adamston to the Connection Hub above the Anchor Hocking Glass property.

West Fork Crossing Section

42 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Three Bridges Perspective

Install Replace switchbacks on demolished Anchor Hocking steep hillside bridges Brownfield Site

Install new pedestrian bridge

To North View US Route 50

West ForkRiver

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 43 0 40 80 160 240 320 Feet ¯

Trestle Bridge

The inactive rail corridor moves South of the Anchor Hocking Glass property and crosses Elk Creek. An old rail-line bridge crosses this creek and although it is in fair condition, it will need to be retrofitted for safety precautions.

Trestle Perspective

Legend

Inactive Railroad

Harrison County Parcels Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, Contours NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

Existing trestle bridge looking South to North.

44 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning The existing bridge crossing over Elk Creek can be retrofitted for rail trail use, upon consultation of a licensed engineer. There are several options for what this bridge may look like, per case studies of other rail trail retrofitting.

A new bridge construction, if the existing bridge structure A retrofitted bridge, similar to this bridge along the is deemed too insecure, may be an opportunity for Silver Comet Trail. This is the preferred option. community engagement regarding design. Photo credit: Wilderness Press Photo credit: Rail Trails Australia

A model rendition of what a retrofitted bridge may look like upon the completion of construction, in relation to context.

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 45 Milford Street Crossing

The inactive rail corridor continues South, reaching a major road convergence along the edges of downtown Clarksburg. At this point, US Route 19, W Pike Street, and Long John Milford Street converge at a triangular Silvers intersection. The old rail corridor passes through the intersection and associated island, and through a commercial parking lot, before Wendy’s continuing South along the West Fork River. Navigating through this intersection and the parking lot will be challenging in regards to pedestrian safety. Milford Street Crossing The proposed design for the Wendy’s Perspective Intersection includes several safety features considering the abundance of traffic from converging roads as well as the parking lot. The trail will move adjacent to the Wendy’s parking lot, along a gravel strip. The trail will utilize crosswalks for crossing W Pike Street and Milford Street. Waiting areas will be located for pedestrian safety. Road signs warning traffic of the trail corridor will be placed 200 feet out from the trail crossing for reaction time. Road signs designating the crossing will be placed directly in front of the trail crossing. Additional suggestions include the use of bollards, lighting, and bench seating. The existing conditions of the Milford Street crossing. Photo credit: Google Maps Milford Street Crossing Perspective

46 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 47 “We will be celebrating spring and hope for our communities,”

- Diana Druga

48 Harrison rail Trails Connectivity Planning North Bend Extension Chapter 4

- Corridor Summary - Community Workshop - Connection Plan Details

Harrison rail Trails Connectivity Planning 49 Corridor Summary

The North Bend Extension begins at the terminus of the existing North Bend Rail- Trail in Wolf Summit and extends to the Clarksburg Connection Hub. The first three miles of the corridor spans 3 miles of public land, presumed to be owned by the WV State Parks, extending from Wolf Summit to Wilsonburg. This corridor through this area is navigable for trail use and only requires minor trail updates and maintenance management.

In Wilsonburg, the corridor is disrupted by an industrial property, where the corridor was sold to a private business owner. An alternate trail route has been proposed around this property and to cross Wilsonburg Road, in order to rejoin the inactive railway.

The inactive railway extends 1 to 2 miles to the east of Wilsonburg before crossing under US Route 50 into Adamston. The section of proposed trail between Wilsonburg and the US Route 50 crossing is located behind private residential properties and is covered in several locations by volunteer and resident-planted vegetation. Vegetation management and trail surface planning and development is needed.

The proposed trail extends to the east, adjacent to US Route 50 approximately ¾ mile into Adamston.

50 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning North Bend Extension Master Connections Map

0 0.45 0.9 1.8 2.7 3.6 4.5 : Miles

Reynoldsville Wilsonburg Adamston

Wolf Summit

Harrison Services LLC

CSX Transportation Inc

Legend Proposed Trail Active Railway

Inactive Railway Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Harrison County Parcels Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 51 Community Workshop

The North Bend Extension workshop focused on the gap from Wolf Summit to the Shop n’ Save in Adamston. This trail corridor crosses vehicular thoroughfares a number of times, requiring specialized way finding and safety precautions, especially entering the Adamston area.

Number of Attendees - 27

Groups Represented - Harrison Rail Trails, Harrison County Planning, National Rails to Trails Conservancy, Salem University, National Parks Service, City of Clarksburg

Assets Frequently used words for proposed trail assets All of the groups identified having a longer trail as an asset. Groups mentioned how the trail connects communities along the trail corridor including Wolf Summit, and Adamston. Access to local business was also important for trail users and business owners, as trail users often stop to resupply, grab something to eat, or stay at a hotel overnight. The trail provides health benefits for people. Finally, trail development brings more awareness of the local ecology.

52 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Challenges A big concern the groups identified was maintenance of the trail corridor and the associated funding. Related was safety and enforcement of regulations; there have been issues with unauthorized vehicles and vandalism. Preexisting perceptions and easement negotiations with gasoline and petroleum companies situated along the trail corridor was also mentioned as a potential challenge. One group also identified environmental hazards along the trail, such as erosion.

Suggested Solutions Many groups suggested community involvement to handle Frequently used words for proposed trail challenges trail maintenance, reaching out to schools, businesses, and other organizations to “ adopt a trail” section or create programs for cleanups. Participants also suggested reaching out to the DNR for regulation enforcement. Improving education and trail awareness was suggested by giving presentations, demonstrations, providing trail activities for the public, and reaching out through media coverage. The groups identified funding opportunities, such as grants, donations, local businesses, big businesses, and volunteering time.

Who is Missing

Local business owners, representatives of the extraction industry, adjacent residents, local school administrators, volunteer groups, and the media

Frequently used words for proposed trail solutions

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 53 Connection Plan Details

Wilsonburg

In Wilsonburg, the inactive railway that previously bisected an industrial property was merged with the property. The property, including the corridor, is fenced and is owned and operated by Ronald Lane. The proposed trail in Wilsonburg, is routed around the industrial property and along Wilsonburg Road. Bollards and/or other infrastructure to improve safety is needed.

Roadside Perspective - Existing Conditions

Roadside Perspective - Proposed Trail

54 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 0 75 150 300 450 600 Feet :

Legend Proposed Trail Trail Ahead Warning Sign Trail Crossing Yield Sign

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 55 “It does have an economic impact, because I have people from Lost Creek saying, ‘Man, I can’t wait for all this stuff to open so we can go on a day trip to Clarksburg,’”

Charlotte Shaffer

"We're just so excited to have the community here today, it's just been a beautiful day and it just warms my heart,"

- Diana Druga

56 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Lost Creek Chapter 5

- Corridor Summary - Community Workshop - Connection Plan Details

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 57 Corridor Summary

Lost Creek Park

The existing park acts as a trail head, and provides amenities such as shelter, restrooms, and parking.

Historic Trestle Bridge

About 1/3 of the way between Lost Creek and the Lewis County line lies an old trestle bridge. This bridge lends itself as an opportune destination point along the trail, as well as an efficient connection

Road Crossings

Throughout this corridor there are multiple cases where the trail crosses small neighborhood roads

Dominion Property

In McWhorter the corridor passes through the Dominion Transmission property, where there is potential for partnership.

Lewis County Line

With the currently proposed Harrison South trail, the trail would stop at the Lewis County Line. Harrison County and Lewis County need to engage in discussions about the continued connection

58 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Lost Creek to Lewis County Master Connections Map

Trail Town Incentives

0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 : Miles

Legend Existing Rail Trail Proposed Trail Proposed Bridge Crossing Minor Road crossings Route 25 Crossing Inactive Railroad County Boundary

Engagement with Lewis County

Trail groups Needed Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 59 Community Workshop

The Lost Creek workshop focused on the gap from the Harrison/Lewis County Line to the Harrison South Rail-Trail in Lost Creek. Many areas along the proposed corridor leading to the county line are overgrown and difficult to identify. The old trestle bridge along the route is a key point of interest along the route.

Number of Attendees - 28

Organizations Represented - Harrison Rail Trails, Harrison County Planning, National Rails to Trails Conservancy, The Exponent Telegram, WVU Landscape Architecture, WVU Extension, North Bend Rail-Trail Association

Assets Frequently used words for proposed trail assets Each group at the workshop identified the trestle bridge as an asset. More than one group also mentioned the opportunity to connect to Watters Smith State Park and Jackson’s Mill. Folks discussed that the trail and surrounding area is very scenic and highly visible from Interstate 79. Participants also talked through the potential catalytic effect that trail tourism will brings to the towns of McWhorter and Lost Creek. Cyclists visiting from other areas and/ or traveling long distances may spend money for overnight stay, bike repair, dining, and other local goods and services, spurring economic boost within the trail towns. Other functional assets of the trail include an existing solid foundation for trail development, as well as easy access to and from the road. Participants also mentioned that Lost Creek residents will benefit by having the option of traveling in 2 directions on the trail, instead of one.

60 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Challenges Although the trestle bridge was an important asset, its need for restoration into a safe crossing was identified as a big challenge for this section. Participants discussed the need to compare the value of the bridge to the cost for repairs. Property acquisition, community support, and cooperation of property owners were also acknowledged as challenges for trail development.

Suggested Solutions Community engagement was a common solution brought up by Frequently used words for proposed trail challenges several groups. Folks suggested the HRT group expand and reach out to stakeholder groups. They also stressed the importance of outreach and education for trail users and those who work and live along the trail. Community support was identified as a key factor in trail development success.These solutions were determined to be high feasibility with significant impact.To fund trail development, participants suggested obtaining money from “deep pockets”, by applying for private and public grants. While the feasibility scale for retrofitting the trestle ranged from group to group, each group agreed that it would have the maximum impact. Participants advised the trail development team to look to case studies of similar successful projects such as trestles that have been improved elsewhere.

Who is Missing West Fork River Watershed Association, fishermen, church youth groups, bankers, energy sector, teachers, business owners, special interest groups, historical societies, the Lions Club, the Women’s Club, government officials, and recreational organizations

Frequently used words for proposed trail solutions

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 61 Connection Plan Details

Lost Creek Park

The existing parks can be used for trail users as a rest stop and as a gateway to the town of Lost Creek. Existing Amenities such as restrooms, shelters, tables, seating, and parking can be expanded upon or offer examples for similar trail adjacent public space.

The park features a gravel parking lot for park and trail users.

A covered pavilion with seating provides shelter and a place to rest for guests.

Restroom facilities and benches make the park a nice rest point along the trail.

62 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 0 30 60 120 180 240 300 : Feet

Town of Lost Creek

Harrison County Commission

Legend Existing Rail Trail Proposed Trail Existing Bridge Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Harrison County Parcels Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 63 Historic Trestle Bridge

A historic trestle bridge connects the elevated former railway across private property. Retrofitting the bridge with surface cover and railing will allow it to support public use for pedestrians and bicycles. The bridge is tall and provides interesting views of the surrounding area. It is also visible from Interstate-79. These factors will make the retrofitted bridge a key destination along the trail and to attract interest from local and regional travelers. Retrofitting is likely benefit the communities of Lost Creek and McWhorter by providing alternative transportation and recreational opportunities.

A view of the trestle bridge looking from I-79 North bound

The existing conditions of the trestle bridge, A perspective of the retrofitted trestle bridge, as seen from the trail looking north as seen from the trail looking north.

Existing Residential Structures

50’

A scaled section looking at the relationship of the bridge to the existing landscape and infrastructure.

64 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 0 45 90 180 270 360 450 : Feet

Rudder, Corey Alan

Frazier, Sheila K.

Curry, David & Daniel Hogsed, Sandra J.

Hogsed, Sarah M. Sutton, Charles R. & Franklin L.

Hogsed, Sandra J.

Strosnider, Karen

Sutton, Charles R. & Franklin L.

Legend Existing Rail Trail Proposed Trail Proposed Bridge Crossing Inactive Railroad Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Harrison County Parcels Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 65 Road Crossings

In one location, the inactive railway and proposed trail intersect Route 25. A crosswalk is needed at this location as well as trail warning signs and trail crossing signage.

Legend

Trail Yield Sign

Trail Ahead Warning Sign

Examples of trail crossing ahead and trail crossing yield signage County Route 25 Crossing Detail

The proposed trail also crosses several small neighborhood roads. A crosswalk and trail crossing signage is proposed in these locations

Legend

Trail Yield Sign Typical Neighborhood Crossing Detail

66 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Dominion Property

0 0.0075 0.015 0.03 0.045 0.06 0.075 Miles The trail corridor will benefit the Dominion facility : in McWhorter by integrating the property into the community. The trail will provide an alternative transportation route for workers and locals as well as recreational opportunities for workers during lunch and before/after work.

Details of the proposed corridor and its impact to Dominion Transmission Inc. the industrial property need to be negotiated with property managers at Dominion Transmission Inc. as well as the private owner of part of the industrial property.

Poe, Worthey E. Jr. & Connie S.

Legend

Proposed Trail Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Harrison County Parcels Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Lewis County Line

County Route 25 From the Harrison County line in McWhorter, the corridor continues across Route 25 and along a Crossing Detail developed gravel road. Engagement with state and Lewis County Trail advocates is suggested.

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 67 68 Harrison rail Trails Connectivity Planning Conclusions

Thanks to all who have partnered and participated in the creation of this connectivity plan. I hope that it will serve as a useful tool to connect the trail gaps in Harrison County and contribute to brownfield and neighborhood revitalization in Harrison County. How awesome it will be to bike from Parkersburg to Pittsburgh and enjoy all of the communities along the way!

-Anna Withrow, NBAC Project Manager NBAC Staff is committed to providing continued project assistance as it relates to the brownfield assessment, cleanup, planning, and redevelopment process.

Harrison rail Trails Connectivity Planning 69 Key Contacts

The following parties have been instrumental in the creation of this plan and continue to be key leaders of trail development in Harrison County

Harrison County Commission Charlotte Shaffer Executive Director, Planning Department [email protected]

Harrison Rail Trails Inc. Diana Druga Jeffrey Davis President Vice President [email protected] [email protected] 304.641.5812 National Parks Service Peggy Pings Outdoor Recreation Planner [email protected] 304.282.7464

Northern West Virginia Brownfields Assistance Center

Anna Withrow Brownfields Remediation Specialist [email protected] 304.293.7002

Rails-to-Trails Conservancy Kelly Pack Kent Spellman Kevin Belanger Trail Development Director Project Coordinator Trail planner [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 202.974.5148 304.476.3838

70 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning Notes ______

Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning 71 Developed and prepared by the Northern WV Brownfields Assistance Center, in partnership with the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy and Harrison County Planning Commission

72 Harrison Rail Trails Connectivity Planning