Core Services and Characteristics of Crisis Centers: A Review of State Service Standards

This project was supported by Grant No. 2008-TA-AX-K043 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, Us. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this publication/program/exhibition are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. What is the National Resource Sharing Project Technical Assistance Map Coalition Resource Sharing Project? The RSP was created to help state sexual assault coalitions across the country access the resources they need in order to develop and thrive. The project is designed to provide technical assistance, support, and to facilitate peer-driven resources for all statewide sexual assault coalitions. The RSP recognizes the needs of all coalitions, especially those designated as new or emerging, regarding issues of organizational growth, professional development, and policy development.

Who is the RSP? The RSP is led by the Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault (IowaCASA), assisted by the North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault (NCCASA) and the Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs (WCSAP).

For ReShape newsletters or other electronic resources, please visit www.resourcesharingproject.org

RURAL TA SPECIALIST REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 Kris Bein Cat Fribley Tracy Wright Tara Wolfe Iowa CASA Iowa CASA NCCASA WCSAP 515-244-7424 515 28th St. 811 Spring Forrest Rd. 4317 6th Ave. SE Suite 107 Suite 900 Olympia, WA 98503 SADI TA COORDINATOR Des Moines, IA 50312 Raleigh, NC 27609 360-754-7583 515-244-7424 919-871-1015 [email protected] Valerie Davis [email protected] [email protected] Iowa CASA Region 3 515-371-6178 Region 2 includes includes Guam, CNMI the Virgin Islands and & American Samoa Puerto Rico Table of Contents

1. Introduction

2. Terminology

3. Method

4. Rape Crisis Center Service Philosophy

5. Rape Crisis Center Clients

6. Rape Crisis Center Services to Individuals

9. Community Services

11. Rape Crisis Center Organization and Operation Will this page still be needed 13. Synopsis of Core Services

14. References

By Kris Bein © 2010 Resource Sharing Project

Distribution Rights: This may be reprinted in its entirety or excerpted with proper acknowledge to the author(s), but may not be altered or sold for profit. Introduction

The anti-sexual assault field is a grassroots movement. To discuss trends, changes and growth in the field of People have been organizing to serve victims of sexual rape crisis work, it is vital to have dialogue defining the violence for close to forty years. In at least 1,300 places field. This document is part of the conversation about across the country, community members have estab- defining sexual assault services. Rape crisis centers and lished rape crisis centers (RCCs). Because these RCCs state coalitions have evolved in unique circumstances, were created locally, they have each evolved differently, but there are commonalities across the field, and there is fitting into the milieu of community needs and existing consensus on some important facets of providing sexual systems. State coalitions, in most places, sprang up as assault services. This document examines several states’ these local centers banded together to pursue statewide sexual assault service standards to uncover similarities and even national action. Local RCCs and state and differences in service provision across the country. coalitions remain strong, independent voices today, State service standards help local rape crisis centers supported by the work of national sexual assault determine what services must be provided at a mini- organizations. The field’s nationwide organizations mum, its core services. From this analysis of state stan- support this individualized growth and do not attempt dards, we can begin to see a national picture of which to make the work uniform. services make up the core services of a rape crisis center. This core looks slightly different in each state, but there are striking consistencies in core services across this sample.

1 Terminology

Rape crisis centers are agencies whose major pur- At the state level, sexual assault coalitions often Core services are the essential services, the services pose is providing victim advocacy and support serve as membership associations for local services that define an RCC as an RCC. Without these services to survivors. They may be providers, and also often advocate for improve- services, the agency would not be a complete attached to a shelter or other ments in laws, services, and resources for survivors RCC. There is consensus throughout the field on social service agency, and they may provide more of sexual violence and their service providers. Each many indispensable features and services provided services than the core, but their focus is on sup- state and territory has a sexual assault coalition by RCCs, and those emerge in these definitions. porting survivors and eradicating sexual violence. (some are combined with their domestic violence Services such as advocacy and crisis intervention RCCs have different names or descriptors (“sexual coalitions).State sexual assault coalitions coordi- emerge as necessary, or core, services. Many other assault services” as one example) but this docu- nate statewide work and provide training and services are also important, but their presence or ment will refer to them as rape crisis centers or technical assistance to member rape crisis centers. absence does not change the agency’s fundamental RCCs for consistency. Services based in law State coalitions function as public policy advisors identity as a sexual assault services provider. These enforcement, courts or hospitals are not included and provide guidance to organizations assisting additions to the core services are considered as RCCs as their goals and methods differ consid- sexual assault victims; additionally, some manage enhanced services. This analysis of state service erably from the work considered in this report. contracts or pass funding through to local rape cri- standards details what services and methods are sis centers. Many coalitions oversee service stan- widely seen as core to the rape crisis center, and In many states, state service standards dictate what dards for member centers; the nature of the service what services may be considered enhanced to services rape crisis centers (RCCs) in that state standards varies according to the function of the those core areas. provide, the way services are provided, and/or who coalition. Coalitions with a stronger governance or qualifies to provide service to sexual violence sur- regulatory function tend to have more detailed or vivors. Many, but not all, states and territories stringent service standards. Coalition governance Core services are the essential have created state service standards to outline what structures and outside influences shape the devel- services, the services that define services must be offered and how they must be opment of the service standards. Representatives of provided. In most cases, adherence to standards member centers govern some coalitions, while oth- an RCC as an RCC. Without these allow RCCs be recognized as a sexual assault ers have community boards with member center services, the agency would not be service provider and receive benefits through the advisory committees or specific seats for member a complete RCC. coalition or state government offices. The level of centers. In many states, such as Iowa, the RCC benefit varies by state, and in some cases includes representatives wrote the service standards. In eligibility for funding. other states, such as California, the standards come from a state office. In some cases, standards written by the coalition are then adopted by fund- ing entities. The relationship between coalition and member centers, state regulations, and other funder requirements play a strong role in the development of each state’s services and service standards.

2 Method

The only documents under consideration in this This document recognizes services to be core when Many states use different terms for similar services. report are state service standards. There is other the standards explicitly require the provision of Where the tasks and activities of different terms documentation and dialogue in the field about the that service or attribute. Services are considered are clearly similar, as in the case of institutional definition and nature of RCCs but this is not enhanced when the standards explicitly make advocacy and systems advocacy, they are combined included here. RCCs may use many different provision of that service optional or when there is for analysis. In some cases, this is difficult to deter- sources and perspectives to arrive at their core no clear mandate. States may disagree on whether mine. These issues are discussed in the service services and self-identity, with the state standards a service is core or enhanced. The purpose of this analysis and noted in the core service chart. providing only one perspective. This report is an document is to illustrate what services the field attempt to synthesize the core services and charac- views as core or enhanced, and where the field teristics of RCCs as defined by state sexual assault concurs on core services. On any given service in coalitions. For this report, the National Sexual this document, if all the state service standards This report is an attempt to Assault Coalition Resource Sharing Project collect- mandate provision of service it is found that there synthesize the core services and ed and analyzed services standards from fifteen is consensus on that service being a core service. characteristics of RCCs as states: California, Connecticut, Florida, Iowa, If a clear majority, but not all, of the standards defined by state sexual assault Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, New mandates a service, the service is identified as a Hampshire, North Carolina, Oregon, common theme or it is generally considered core. coalitions. Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington, and West Where there is no clear majority or agreement, Virginia. All the standards in the sample came it is found that there is no consensus among from state coalitions, with the exception of the sample. California, North Carolina, Washington, and Kentucky. Standards from those four states came from state regulation or law. It is unknown what role the state coalitions played in shaping the serv- ice standards in those states.

3 Rape Crisis Center Service Philosophy

For all the standards examined in this sample, the their service standards with guiding principles, understanding of or approach to sexual violence is including, “Violence against women is rooted in The social justice-based models grounded in social justice. The language about the institutional imbalances of power between of intervention that grew out of social justice is sometimes subtle, sometimes overt, men and women, in sex-role stereotyping, in gen- the anti-violence movement hold but it is an underlying theme to the RCC der based values and in ” (Missouri approach to sexual assault. Many traditional men- Coalition Against Domestic And Sexual Violence that clients are inherently well tal health treatments and social work practices are [MCADSV], p. ii). The topic requirements in people, but it helps to get some based in the medical model of diagnosing prob- training curricula most clearly revealed certain val- support after a devastating event lems and treating symptoms. The social justice- ues, even in states with less value-laden overall such as violence. based models of intervention that grew out of the standards. The values of self-determination, auton- anti-violence movement hold that clients are omy, and fully informed choice are visible in the inherently well people, but it helps to get some expectations surrounding documentation, client support after a devastating event such as violence. consent, grievances, and information and referral There is wide variation of social justice models services. One state in the sample requires first used in the standards for rape crisis centers responders to be female; a few more expressed a (RCCs), but few standards omitted a theoretical preference for females but did not have mandates. framework for understanding sexual violence. The service standards examined have sections on phi- losophy, approach, guiding principles or ethics that used terms like “empowerment,” “victim-cen- tered,” “without blame,” or “trauma-informed.” Some go further in defining a framework for understanding sexual violence, trauma, and work- ing with survivors in specific standards on advoca- cy and intervention practices. Missouri begins

4 Rape Crisis Center Clients

Service to sexual violence survivors is one of the and Children. There is a wide deviation in the expec- primary functions of RCCs, so a definition of sex- “Client” – In the case of counseling, a person tations and standards of service provision to chil- ual violence survivor is required to know whom to generally becomes a client when the center dren. Some standards do not broach the subject at serve and whom not to serve. The majority of the has gathered enough information to assign a all, some require programs to serve adults and sample did not have a detailed client definition client identification number or the person children, and some require programs to serve section, but referred to “primary and secondary seeks additional services from the program teenagers, but not children less than thirteen years victims” of sexual violence or assault (Connecticut subsequent to crisis intervention services. In of age. Some states serve teenagers thirteen and Sexual Assault Crisis Services, Inc. [CONNSACS], the case of advocacy, a person generally over with the same services given to adults, but p. 2; Florida Council Against Sexual Violence becomes a client when the center provides RCCs must meet additional requirements in train- [FCASV], p. 1) ,“sexual assault victims” telephone or in-person advocacy services relat- ing, facilities, and services to serve children under (California Governor’s Office of Emergency ed to medical care or reporting to law thirteen. Some states encourage relationships with Services [OES], p. 1), or simply, “clients” (Idaho enforcement. “Victim” – Any person of any Child Advocacy Centers or other community serv- Coalition Against Sexual And Domestic Violence age who seeks assistance after being sexually ice providers, while others do not. Some child- [ICASDV] p. 1). No state asks for evidence or assaulted. The sexual assault survivor is related state service standards are heavily influ- corroboration of sexual assault, and some assert referred to as victim throughout these stan- enced by state regulation or law or funder require- that staff and volunteers must treat all clients as dards because the focus of services is based ments concerning any social services to children. credible. Here are two examples of detailed client upon the victimization she has experienced. There is no clear consensus on service to children. definitions: “Significant others” – Significant others also Significant others/secondary victims. There is A contractor shall identify an individual as a feel the impact of sexual assault and these variation regarding the amount of discussion on client if the individual is a victim of sexual standards also apply to services provided to services to significant others, ranging from no violence, requests services from the center, significant others. A significant other is any direction to detailed regulation on what services and if the center opens a case file that con- person of any age who seeks assistance in significant others may receive. No state barred or tains a PW-652 form, a service plan, and case dealing with their own crisis/feelings as a discouraged serving significant others. At mini- notes. A significant other shall be defined as result of the sexual assault of a loved one... mum, most encourage crisis intervention or infor- an individual of any age, other than the vic- (Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault mation and referral for significant others and some tim, who has been affected by sexual violence, [ICASA], p. 5-3) allow for or encourage full services to significant who requests service from the center and others, especially those of child victims. Thus it receives such service. A significant other No state put limitations on service related to tim- ing or type of sexual assault. That is, survivors do can be determined that service to significant others includes a parent, guardian, spouse, partner, is a generally agreed upon as a core RCC service. sibling, child, and/or close personal friend of not need to seek services within a certain window a victim of sexual violence. The contractor to be eligible. Some states are more explicit in this shall provide crisis services to the community than others. Though every state is clear about serv- served. Crisis not only includes the victimiza- ing adults who have been sexually assaulted, there tion incident, but also recent memory, disclo- are differences in service to other clients, e.g. chil- sure, triggering event, or any legal proceeding dren and significant others/secondary victims. or involvement. (Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape [PCAR], p. 13)

5 Rape Crisis Center Services to Individuals

24-hour Crisis Intervention Telephone. All states in the sample consider a specific…[including] assistance in making 24-hour hotline a core service. States have many informed decisions about medical care and This was the category with perhaps the most var- clear requirements on availability, the maximum the preparations needed, including referral for ied definitions and services. A good working defi- allowable time lapse between initial contact and possible forensic exam; information about nition comes from Florida: “a timely response by a connection with the agency if using an answering medical care/concerns, including assistance trained staff member or volunteer to an individual service, plans for hotline failure, training, and with needed follow-up; support at medical presenting a crisis related to sexual violence…to other facets. Even states with austere regulations exams and appointments, and; information reduce the level of trauma experienced as a result on other issues have detailed hotline requirements. and/or assistance with Crime Victim of sexual violence by assisting victims in strength- Compensation applications (Washington ening their coping skills through empathic In-person. Provision of in-person crisis interven- Office of Crime Victim Advocacy response.” It is “short-term; may be episodic” and tion is detailed in only a few places, and often [OCVA], p. 4). may include “information about the effects of sex- conflated with other services, such as counseling ual violence and possible reactions; general infor- or medical advocacy. A distinction of in-person Illinois explains: mation about medical and legal issues; offering crisis intervention as a separate service may be The advocate provides in-person support and advocacy and information about other services superfluous. information to sexual assault victims at med- available in the community; active listening and ical facilities. With victim permission, the empathic responding; exploring options; and, Medical Advocacy advocate stays with the victim throughout the referral to 24 hour sexual violence hotline” exam and evidence collection process and (FCASV, p. 3). California has a unique require- Broadly speaking, advocacy is “supporting and provides follow-up services and referrals. The ment for centers to attempt to turn hotline con- assisting a victim/survivor to define needs, explore priority of the advocate is with the victim, tacts into regular clients: options, and ensure rights are respected within any not the medical facility…Individual medical systems with which the victim/survivor interacts” Centers must offer to contact all clients within 3 advocacy services include telephone and (NHCADSV, p. 48). The level of detail here varies working days after providing crisis intervention in-person contacts with sexual assault/abuse considerably. Some standards discuss advocacy services and shall do so when appropriate and/or victims and their non-offending significant only in the context of emergency care, while according to the needs of the client…A minimum others and contact with emergency room or other states allowed for a wider range of advocacy of 45 % of clients receiving crisis intervention other medical personnel regarding medical tasks. Washington, for example, defines medical services must receive follow-up counseling services. issues as related to the sexual assault/abuse. advocacy as: An attempt to provide this service for each client Services include provision of information and is required (OES, p. 2). Acting on behalf of and in support of victims resources regarding the victim’s rights and of /assault on a 24-hour basis to options regarding follow-up services. Medical ensure their interests are represented and their advocacy also includes corresponding with Advocacy is “supporting and rights upheld… To assist the victim to regain the victim or medical personnel regarding specific concerns about the victim’s case assisting a victim/survivor to personal power and control as s/he makes decisions regarding medical care and to pro- (ICASA, p. 5-15). define needs, explore options, mote an appropriate response from individual and ensure rights are respected.” service providers. [It] may vary significantly depending upon client’s medical needs as related to the sexual assault. All activities and services are client-focused and case

6 Rape Crisis Center Services to Individuals

Accompaniment. Many states differentiate to legal services…and information and referral on Pennsylvania simply defines all advocacy as “[facil- accompaniment from advocacy, consider it a related civil processes” (NHCADSV, p. 27). itating] the client’s negotiation of the different sys- task within the umbrella of advocacy, or require Advocacy (and accompaniment) in West Virginia: tems encountered as a result of being impacted by programs to provide only accompaniment (but not facilitates the client’s interaction with law sexual violence” (PCAR, p. 14). There is a further ongoing advocacy). The intention of the states enforcement and the criminal justice system directive to provide accompaniment, but this that use the term accompaniment seems to be the through support, information, referrals, and directive does not confine services in any way. activity of providing emotional in-person sup- requested accompaniments to any investiga- port/supportive presence to survivors during tions, interviews, court hearings, and other Counseling/Therapy medical exams, police interviews, and other legal proceeding related to the sexual victimization processes (though most often in medical exams). [to] assist the individual in receiving digni- The states in this sample do not all consider provi- However, in all cases, the line between accompani- fied, victim-centered treatment within the law sion of counseling or therapy a core service. Crisis ment and advocacy is unclear or not defined. For enforcement and criminal justice system as it intervention and short-term counseling are the purposes of this document, accompaniment is relates to sexual victimization (West Virginia deemed core much more often than therapy is. a task under the umbrella of advocacy services. Foundation for Rape Information and Definitions of crisis intervention, counseling, and Services [FRIS], p. 6). therapy vary quite a bit. Crisis intervention is usu- Legal Advocacy ally separated from counseling, therapy and sup- port groups in the standards, and is therefore sepa- Again, advocacy is “supporting and assisting a vic- General Advocacy/ rated here (see above for discussion of crisis inter- tim/survivor to define needs, explore options, and Other Advocacy/Case Management vention). Counseling or supportive counseling is ensure rights are respected within any systems with The majority of the states in the sample focus only usually described as short term, solution or action- which the victim/survivor interacts” (NHCADSV, on medical and legal advocacy, but a few attend to focused and less intensive interventions and thera- p. 48). The level of detail here varies considerably, other advocacy issues. This is a murky point py is described as longer-term, more intensive and though some level of legal advocacy is generally because the issues covered under general advocacy more in-depth intervention. Guidelines generally considered a core service. Expectations run from in one state may be considered information and adhere to standard counseling practices, ethics, providing legal referrals to substantial involvement referral in another state or medical/legal advocacy and theories; this is reflected in job descriptions, in supporting survivors through legal proceedings. in yet another, and most are not detailed. Iowa, in case plans, intervention modalities, and expecta- There is generally more detail and focus on med- one of the few detailed examples of general advo- tions of duration. Quite a few states considered ical advocacy than legal advocacy across the sam- cacy, calls for: counseling an enhanced service, requiring pro- ple. Legal advocacy focuses largely on law enforce- grams to have community referrals but not a staff ment and criminal justice proceedings, though a written plan for providing ongoing advocacy counselor. Many more states consider short-term most states allow for information and referral on to assist sexual assault victims in meeting their counseling core but therapy an enhanced or civil matters. New Hampshire’s definition of advo- additional needs in accessing services not pro- optional service. Some, like California, mandate cacy includes “24-hour access to law enforcement vided by the program, including but not lim- access to longer-term counseling: “Centers must accompaniment…ongoing criminal justice system ited to legal services; housing (transitional, make long-term counseling services available. support…accompaniment for criminal sexual vio- temporary, permanent); financial assistance; This means to provide the service or to make lence, domestic violence and stalking cases, referral mental health services; alcohol and other drug treatment and recovery programs; immigra- tion assistance; healthcare; employment; and parenting assistance (Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault [IowaCASA], p. 31).

continued on next page 7 Rape Crisis Center Services to Individuals arrangements through other agencies or individu- Support Groups Information and Referral als” (OES, p. 3). A few have detailed guidelines for referring to therapists. Some states have supersed- Support groups are a different service than Information and referral service standards describe ing laws or regulations concerning licensure or therapy, and different yet than therapeutic groups. how providers make referrals to other community education for all counselors; these are reflected in Standards typically require a trained staff or volun- services, and provide general information and the respective sexual assault service standards. teer to facilitate support groups. The few standards resources about healing. The line between infor- Illinois describes the difference between counseling on therapeutic groups in this sample required mation and referral services and general advocacy and therapy: Master’s level counseling degrees for facilitators. is often blurry. In some states, where fulltime Some of the standards on support groups also advocates and/or counselors may not be the Sexual Assault Counseling is victim-centered require a Master’s degree for facilitators, indicating norm, referral to community advocacy services or counseling with the goal of supporting the some overlap in the definitions of therapeutic and counseling services are held within the domain of victim’s recovery process through listening, support groups. West Virginia defines support information and referral services. A few states encouraging, validating, reflecting, giving groups thusly: require annual updating of a resource and referral resources, and providing a safe counseling provider manual. Most require that more than one environment. Sexual Assault Counseling is Individuals meeting in a safe, supportive, non-judgmental environment on a regular, referral be given, and some had prohibitions or seen as working with the victim on current limits on referring to services provided by board issues, normalizing and validating her reac- scheduled basis to exchange information, share techniques for problem solving, and to members or volunteers. Connecticut stipulates tions to the trauma and facilitating a return to what community services must be in the agency’s pre-trauma functioning…Sexual Assault explore feelings resulting from sexual violence. [The purpose is to] foster a sense of regaining resource listings, from counseling and dentistry to Therapy encompasses Sexual Assault LGBTQ services and housing (CONNSACS, p.2). Counseling and entails more in-depth, control, promote an understanding of the process-oriented work for adults or more effects of sexual violence, and assist with experiential work for children. Sexual Assault finding resolution concerning the sexual Therapy is most often aimed at helping the victimization (FRIS, p. 9). Support groups “foster a sense of victim identify longer-term life patterns and Vermont directs centers to “offer support regaining control, promote an coping mechanisms, or established survival groups…whenever the program determines that understanding of the effects of skills. Sexual Assault Therapy may work on support groups are an appropriate peer support more process-oriented internal changes. The sexual violence, and assist with strategy in their service area and there are a goal of Sexual Assault Therapy is for the vic- finding resolution concerning the sufficient number of service users to form a group” tim to be able to utilize the insight gained to sexual victimization.” (Vermont Network Against Domestic and Sexual promote healthy internal and external Violence [Network], p. 10). Therapeutic groups changes. Sexual Assault Therapy is typically are certainly an enhanced service. Like counseling (but not always) longer-term work (ICASA, and therapy, there is no consensus among the p. 5-24—5-25). sample on whether offering support groups is a core service.

8 Community Services

Services directed at institutions, groups or the other terms used under this umbrella. Further Community Awareness community as a whole, rather than individual confusion arises from the fact that some states call survivors are grouped here as community services. individual criminal justice or medical advocacy Idaho, like many states, requires community edu- Within community services, prevention education, with clients “systems advocacy.” Prevention educa- cation to cover “The availability of agency servic- community awareness, professional training, and tion is becoming a well-defined activity in the es/resources related to sexual violence and victims’ institutional or systems advocacy are the most field, but there is still much overlap with commu- rights [and] the incidence, severity and dynamics commonly described activities. The standards in nity awareness or other terms in the state service of sexual violence, which may include local statis- the sample do not deem community services core standards. Notably, professional education and tics” (ICASDV, p. 5). Other states, like North as often as they do individual services. However, a institutional advocacy do not necessarily go Carolina, mandate publication and provision of community presence of some type can be consid- hand-in-hand; some states required one but not brochures and other written materials on services, ered an agreed-upon core service, whether it is the other. Within all of these various definitions, community resources, and/or general sexual assault through community education, public service there are common themes in service. information (North Carolina Council for announcements, or institutional relationships. Women/Domestic Violence Commission [NC Connecticut, for example, mandates “each mem- Council]). Some states refer to community aware- Prevention Education ber center will be an active community resource ness activities (which are somewhat conflated with institutional advocacy) as “social change,” as in providing information, outreach, support, and There is great variation among the states on Washington: training. In addition, each member center shall be prevention education requirements. Within its actively involved in community-based committees prevention education standard, Pennsylvania The agency/program advocates for social regarding sexual abuse…” (CONNSACS, p. 3). differentiates presentations from training; change by addressing community conditions Because these community services are not defined presentations “inform the public” while trainings which adversely affect sexual abuse/assault vic- uniformly across the states, it is difficult to deter- “develop skills” (PCAR, p. 15). Some states, such tims/survivors and with other organizations mine whether they are considered core across the as Pennsylvania and Iowa, include systems change working toward the elimination of sexual vio- sample. The divisions between these categories are or social change advocacy as a task under preven- lence…[demonstrated by] Written evidence generally unclear; there is little agreement on any tion education. New Hampshire requires: that shows that the agency provides a mecha- distinct definitions of the tasks or categories with- nism for staff, volunteers, clients and their Member programs shall develop and maintain in community services. Standards use terms like families to advocate for social change around relationships with schools and youth organiza- systems change, institutional advocacy, profession- sexual abuse/assault issues, both within the tions to promote awareness of sexual violence, al training, community awareness, prevention edu- agency and in the community at domestic violence, and stalking within their cation, and social service advocacy to describe the large…Evidence that the agency participates catchment area. Member program utilizes, at services to institutions and communities. (through membership or other evidence of a minimum research or science based pro- Outreach, social change, and activism are some involvement) in statewide and national grams and curricula and whenever possible, groups to improve service for individual evidence-based curricula and materials (New clients, identify gaps in service, advocate for Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and needed change, and share training and other Sexual Violence [NHCADSV], p. 44). resources (OCVA, p. 11).

continued on next page 9 Community Services

Professional Training Institutional Advocacy/Systems Advocacy/Relationships with Institutions Advocating for change in the Of the states that address professional training, most list it as a task under prevention educa- Advocating for change in the system responses to system responses to all (or large tion/community awareness or institutional all (or large clusters of) sexual violence survivors, clusters of) sexual violence advocacy, but a few pull it out as a separate task. not individual cases, is an important component survivors, not individual cases, Professional training in these states is normally of anti-violence work. The mandated activities for is an important component of directed at law enforcement, prosecutors, medical institutional relationships generally include net- anti-violence work. personnel, social service personnel, and other working agreements and attempts to participate in institutional allies. Illinois provides a typical Sexual Assault Response Teams, Multi-Disciplinary definition of professional training: “the center Teams, or community task forces of some sort. provides in-depth education, skills building and Most of the sample, however, leave the specific evaluation of skills to prepare other professionals activities and targeted institutions to the individ- to effectively intervene on behalf of victims of ual center’s discretion. California explains agency sexual violence within their institutions” (ICASA, coordination: “Centers must establish themselves p. 5-31). Some states specifically identify medical as active participants in local public and private and criminal justice personnel as targets of service networks in order to provide for timely and professional training, but most leave the audience comprehensive responses to sexual assault victims’ for RCCs to determine. needs” (OES, p. 5). Likewise, Florida cites the importance of a “ a permanent, client-centered system which offers, or assures access to, a comprehensive continuum of core and enhanced sexual violence services, which is mutually accountable despite individual changes over time in regulations, procedures or people who provide services” (FCASV, p. 6). Illinois states that the work is “on behalf of all sexual assault victims to secure sensitive, effective policies and procedures for handling sexual assault cases. The needs and rights of victims rather than institutions are the priority of institutional advocacy” (IL, p. 5-29).

10 Rape Crisis Center Organization and Operation

The services provided to sexual violence survivors accountable. A variety of tasks, products, and somewhat of an RCC specialty and is an impor- compose the quintessential defining features of procedures evince RCC accountability, as illustrat- tant departure from classic mental health modali- rape crisis centers. However, the methods and ed in this sample of states. The level of accounta- ties. For counseling supervision and review, some structuring of service provision merit discussion bility or evaluation for all the services varies con- states use a loose formula: everyone gets at least here as well. These features provide additional siderably from state to state. New Hampshire’s one hour of supervision per month, but this insight and perspective into the work of RCCs. standards, for example, require that “the crisis line increases based on the amount of contact the will be tested once per quarter and tests will be worker has with SA survivors. Other states base Accountability. Accountability is not a core reported in the monitoring visit/report” (New supervision requirements on job title (e.g. coun- service, or a specific service or action, but is an Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and selors and therapists) or types of clients served essential feature of RCCs for a few important rea- Sexual Violence [NHCADSV], p. 25). Vermont (child therapists get different or more intensive sons. First, some federal, state, and local funders, requires, “programs will establish written princi- supervision than adult therapists do). licensing bodies, and other regulatory bodies ples or a written code of ethics for behavior of require and/or reward good business practices and staff towards persons they service. The principles Agency policies, procedures, by-laws are up- sound client service techniques. Demonstrating or code of ethics may not conflict with the to-date and in force; agency uses good business accountability and responsibility builds trust and [Vermont] Network’s mission and principles” practices. This is noted in most, though not all respect in the eyes of community members and (Network, p. 6). standards. Some have detailed guidelines, while funders. Second, rape crisis work is a client-cen- the majority has simple directives. tered, survivor-driven field. One facet of client- Initial Training. The amount of training workers centered service is transparent, responsible service, (both employees and volunteers) must receive Adherence to applicable state and federal laws, as seen in the provision of information on griev- before interacting with clients varies widely across such as confidentiality, licensure, and mandated ance procedures and client rights to all clients, or states, from fifteen to forty hours. There is also reporting. This is noted in most, though not all high training standards. In its “Principles of great variation in the window for completion of standards. The degree of detail varies widely, from Service Standards and Guidelines,” Missouri training. Some states require a portion of training a directive to follow applicable state law to proclaims that “sexual violence programs are before any direct-service contact with the remain- detailed interpretation and guidance on applica- accountable to the survivors requesting or der of training to be completed within a longer tion. A handful of standards include ethical codes receiving services” (MCADSV, p.ii). Third, as a period, while others require the entire training to or ethical guidelines; the standards more common- grassroots movement, advanced degrees or be completed before any direct-service contact. A ly direct programs to have their own written ethi- extensive traditional clinical experience are not few states had slight variations in training require- cal guidelines. All the state standards emphasize often required of workers. Thus, state service ments based on the services provided (i.e. different the importance of confidentiality separately from standards are not based on an assumption of other, topics are required to work on the hotline than other ethical or legal concerns (see below). The overriding conduct codes (although many direct provide advocacy, etc). majority of the sample had no standards on workers to obey codes from applicable state and educational degree requirements for employees. regulatory bodies) or training such as social work Continuing Education. These regulations also Those that did have requirements typically only degrees and licensing. This has led to the genesis vary widely, though some amount is required in covered degree requirements for therapists and of sexual assault-specific training standards and nearly all the standards. The enforcement counselors. conduct codes that hold workers and agencies mechanisms are largely unclear. Supervision, Record Review, Counseling Plans, And Service Documentation. Much of this is consistent with generally accepted counseling prac- tice. The collected standards vary widely in the amount of detail and structure provided. However, the emphasis on client-driven counseling plans is continued on next page 11 Rape Crisis Center Organization and Operation

Response times and usage of answering services Confidentiality. Policies may or may not clearly ref- states require toll free hotline services, including or outside services. Many, though not all, have erence state code, but confidentiality is explicitly dis- toll free TTY access. guidelines on response time for telephone and in- cussed in all policies reviewed. About half the sample person crisis intervention; Iowa, for example, speci- supplies detailed guidelines on documentation, Cultural Competence, Anti-Oppression, and fies response should be “within 15-30 minutes for releases, allowable disclosures, and expectations for Non-Discrimination. Standards diverge in extent, urban and as soon as possible for rural” (IowaCASA, board, staff, volunteers, and clients (the other half placement, and language, but all specifically include p. 30). Most states required a live person answer the had brief policies or referred the reader to docu- some remarks on non-discrimination and diversity. crisis telephone, although there was wide variation in ments not in this sample) Some emphasize confi- The minimal message was simply a non-discrimina- the allowable methods for receiving and responding dentiality as a guiding principle. tion policy; the most comprehensive standards to calls. A few states require TTY access explicitly. require specific training and/or require the profile Agency Identity. Several states mandate local agen- of the board/staff to be representative of the local cies to promote themselves as the community sexual community. West Virginia and Pennsylvania have assault crisis agency (through networking agree- additional statements on religious non-affiliation. Coverage for sexual assault clients in dual ments, PSA’s, etc.) or require clear agency identifica- A handful of states also have HIV/AIDS-specific agencies. Many states cover the qualifications for tion as a sexual assault service provider (e.g. using standards on non-discrimination and medically providing service to sexual assault survivors in their the words “sexual assault” or “rape crisis center” in accurate information. training requirements or personnel requirements, publications or when answering the crisis line). but do not address the issues of service parity in dual This was not common enough to be considered an Other Noteworthy Activities and Features. Florida domestic violence/sexual assault agencies. A few agreed-upon feature, but it is noteworthy. For exam- includes medical exams in its enhanced services, states, in recognition that almost all center staff is ple, West Virginia’s standards require programs to: though the details are scant. Illinois allows for annu- dual, mandate coverage specifically for sexual vio- al “advocacy forums” that are optional, and requires lence survivors. Iowa requires: Publicize available services on a regular basis. centers to provide an annual education and activism Written documentation must be kept detailing plan. California requires quarterly participation in A minimum of at least the equivalent of one communications. Incorporate a marketing mix full-time Certified Sexual Abuse Counselor SART or MDT meetings as well as other systems or such as press, radio, internet, and television in institutional advocacy activities. California also must be employed by the Center. Only public relations campaign. Take the lead role in Certified Sexual Abuse Counselors will provide requires annual “human relations” training on serv- being the primary resource in the community ing people who have been oppressed or experienced individual and group counseling to victims and for providing information about sexual vio- training to staff and volunteers. Sexual Assault discrimination for all staff and volunteers. lence. Network with a wide range of organiza- Washington allows for specific services and activities Crisis Centers are strongly encouraged to have tions/groups including business, religious, civic, two out of every five employees certified as beyond core services that are directed at marginal- educational, community, and other professional ized communities. A handful of states consider Sexual Abuse Counselors. Any Sexual Assault groups (FRIS, p. 14). Victim Counselor that is providing 25% or access to emergency or temporary housing a core more time to sexual assault victims, regardless Cost. Many in the sample required all or some of service. Iowa includes multicultural outreach (which of years of experience or licensure, is required to the services to be provided free of charge. Only a includes help with VAWA self-petitions and U- be a Certified Sexual Abuse Counselor few provided no guidance on this issue. The most Visas), and transportation. Iowa also has a detailed (IowaCASA, p. 47). common free services were crisis intervention, ethical code for RCC workers. North Carolina’s accompaniment, and advocacy; the most likely to be programs must reserve one seat on the board of Idaho has several levels of services, but requires “all subject to a fee was counseling/therapy. In many directors for a sexual assault survivor (though basic programs must have at least one staff person cases, a number of free sessions (of any service) had disclosure of survivor status to the entire board and who meets the criteria for a ‘Sexual Assault Crisis to be provided before the center could assess a fee. beyond is not mandated). Advocate/Victim Advocate’” (ICASDV, p. 2) The only cost allowed regarding the hotline in any of the sample was a toll for the call. However, many 12 Synopsis of Core Services

This chart illustrates the services named core or circumstances, the box is marked with a “+.”The box because they are considered core in only a few states. required in the state service standards. Services con- is left empty in cases where services are clearly con- Therapy, for example, is not considered core often sidered core in each state are marked with an “X.” In sidered enhanced or are not addressed by the state. enough to be included here but counseling is. (See some cases, it is difficult to determine the level of discussion above for the distinction between counsel- requirement for a service, because the service defini- Continuing Education hours were left blank if the ing and therapy.)Crisis intervention includes 24-hour tion is unclear (professional training, for example) or standard did not refer to continuing education or left telephone hotline and other crisis services; see above there is not clearly directive language. In those it unclear. Some services are excluded from this list discussion for more information on this category.

CA CT FL IA ID IL KY MO1 NC NH OR1 PA VT WA WV

Initial training hours 40 30 30 202 40 40 40 40 20 30 30 40 20 30 153

Continuing ed. hours 12 4612 20 6-12 86612 8

Crisis intervention XXXXXXX XX+ XXXX

Info & referral XXXXXXX XX+ XXXX

General Advocacy XXXXXXX XX+ XXXX

Medical Advocacy XXXXXXX XX+ XXXX

Legal Advocacy XXXXXXX XX+ XXXX

Counseling XX X XX X X X

Support Groups XXXX XXXXX

Prevention 4 X + XXXXX X Community Awareness 4 XXXXXX XX X XX

Prof. training ++ XX X X

Systems Advocacy X + X + XXXXX

1 Missouri’s Service Standards and Guidelines for Sexual Violence Programs has guidelines for crisis intervention/ 24-hour hotline, information & referral, general advocacy, medical advocacy, legal advocacy, professional therapy, and support groups, but does not explicitly require the provision of any of those services. The standards are directives for how to provide each service, if provided. Oregon’s Self-Assessment Tool is similar, though the tool proclaims, “sexual assault (SA) services should provide emergency crisis intervention, advocacy and information services to adult and adolescent survivors of rape and sexual abuse” (OCADSV, p. 28).

2 Workers in Iowa are cross-trained with DV initially, and only eight of these twenty hours must be sexual assault-specific. Workers must obtain an additional 48 hours of sexual assault training within their first year of work.

3 Training standards currently under revision; initial training hours will be raised to 40.

4 The difference between these two was unclear or unaddressed in many states; the author used best judgment or combined the categories. 13 References

Connecticut Sexual Assault Crisis Services, Inc North Carolina Council for Women/Domestic (undated). Member agency criteria and standards of Violence Commission, a division of the North operation. East Hartford CT: Connecticut Sexual Carolina Department of Administration (2009). Assault Crisis Services, Inc. Sexual assault program guidelines. Raleigh NC: North Carolina Department of Administration. Florida Council Against Sexual Violence (undat- ed). Florida sexual violence program standards. Office of Crime Victim. Advocacy (1999). State of Tallahassee FL: Florida Council Against Sexual Washington sexual abuse/assault services standards. Violence. Olympia WA: State of Washington Office of Crime Victims. Advocacy. Idaho Coalition Against Sexual & Domestic Violence (undated). Sexual assault program stan- Oregon Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual dards. Boise ID: Idaho Coalition Against Sexual & Violence (2008). Self-assessment tool: Oregon Domestic Violence Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Program Standards. Portland OR: Oregon Coalition Against Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault (2004). Domestic and Sexual Violence. ICASA policy and procedures manual. Springfield IL: Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape (2008). PCAR standards. Enola PA: Pennsylvania Coalition Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault (2005). Against Rape. Membership standards for sexual assault crisis centers. Des Moines IA: Iowa Coalition Against Sexual State of California Governor’s Office of Assault. Emergency Services Law Enforcement and Victim Services Division, (2007). Service standards for the Kentucky Legislature. Standards for Rape Crisis operations of rape crisis standards. Sacramento CA: Centers. 920 KAR 2:010 (2004). Governor’s Office of Emergency Services.

Missouri Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Vermont Network Against Domestic and Sexual Violence (2009). Service standards and guidelines Violence (circa 2004). Program standards. for sexual violence programs. Jefferson City MO: Montpelier VT: Vermont Network Against Missouri Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Domestic and Sexual Violence. Violence. West Virginia Foundation for Rape Information New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and and Services (2003). WVFRIS Rape crisis center Sexual Violence (2007). Program standards. standards. Fairmont WV: West Virginia Concord NH: New Hampshire Coalition Against Foundation for Rape Information and Services. Domestic and Sexual Violence.

14