REGULAR OPEN COUNCIL REPORT Development Services Department for the July 8, 2019 Council Meeting

REGULAR OPEN COUNCIL REPORT Development Services Department For the July 8, 2019 Council Meeting

DATE: July 8, 2019 File No. Z-2019-03

TO: Mayor and Council

FROM: Christopher Garrish (Contract Planner)

RE: Official Community Plan & Zoning Amendment Bylaws – 5931 Airport Street

RATIONALE:

This application is seeking to amend the zoning of the property at 5931 Airport Street (legally described as Lot 1, Plan KAP38137, District Lot 2450S, SDYD, Except Plan KAP51368, KAP67667 & KAP82324) in order to allow for its development to an approximately 46-unit affordable housing development designed for families and seniors.

To facilitate this development, the following amendments to the Town of Oliver land use bylaws are being proposed in relation to the subject property:

• amend the land use designation under Schedule ‘B’ (OCP Map) of the OCP Bylaw from Commercial Highway (CH) to High Density Residential (HR);

• amend the designation under Schedule ‘F’ (Form and Character Development Permit Areas Map) of the OCP Bylaw from Commercial to Multiple Family; and

• amend the zoning under Schedule ‘B’ (Zoning Bylaw Map) of the Zoning Bylaw from Highway Commercial Site Specific (C2s) to Residential High Density One Site Specific (RH1s).

The site specific regulation is proposing to carry forward the current building height limitation of 14.7 metres above 301.85 metres (GSC datum) contained in the C2s Zone and which relate to the operation of the Oliver Airport.

The site specific regulation is further proposing to carry forward existing on-site vehicle parking requirements for an apartment building or townhouse, which are as follows:

• 1.5 parking space per dwelling unit with 2 bedrooms or more; and • 1.25 parking space per dwelling unit with less than 2 bedrooms.

In support of the rezoning, the applicant has stated that “with the financial support of BC Housing through the 2018 Build BC: Community Housing Fund [they] have developed a comprehensive plan that supports the Town’s community vision of improving the availability of safe, adequate and affordable housing that ensures social, economic, and physical health outcomes of the community are met.”

OPTIONS:

1. Council may choose to support the recommendation. 2. Council may choose to refer back to staff for additional information. 3. Council may choose not to support the recommendation.

RECOMMENDATION:

THAT Official Community Plan Amendment Bylaw 1370.07 and Zoning Amendment Bylaw 1380.08 be read a first time;

AND THAT, prior to second reading, the applicant:

• convene a public information meeting in accordance with Section 4.1 of the Town of Oliver Land Use Procedures Bylaw 1367, in order to provide an additional opportunity for the public to access information and inquire about the proposal; and

• provide the Town with a copy of all representations received at this public information meeting including a summary of any proposed changes to the proposed development as a result of feedback received at the public information meeting.

RECOMMENDATION IMPLICATIONS:

In considering this proposal, staff note that a Broad Community Goal of the OCP Bylaw is to “encourage a diversity of housing options for a range of incomes, lifestyles and age groups” and at the time of the 2016 Census apartment buildings of less than 5 storeys represented approximately 12.76% of the housing stock within the Town.

In this context, the applicant’s proposal is seen to be consistent with the goal of diversifying housing stock within the Town and to provide more medium and higher density dwelling unit options for residents.

Staff further note that the Plan speaks to encouraging affordable housing opportunities while the site specific amendment that currently applies to the subject property also speaks to specifically collecting of monies to be used for affordable housing through the development of this site.

The applicant’s proposal is again seen to be consistent with these aspects of the Plan that relate to the provision of non-market affordable housing and is also within easy walking distance (generally considered to be 400 metres as this can be quicker than driving) of the Oliver Place Mall as well as the Town Centre and the River Channel.

The Plan also speaks to requiring a “high standard of architectural building design and landscaping for high density residential development” and to meet this it is being proposed to include the property within the Multi-Family Development Permit (MFDP) Area designation. This designation will require that Council approve a form & character development permit for this property prior to the issuance of a building permit.

The MFDP Area designation provides guidelines that relate to the siting and massing of buildings, ensuring that pedestrian orientated architecture is used in the design, ensuring the provision of useable private outdoor spaces, the design of parking and access areas, use of screening and landscaping on a site and encouraging energy and conservation design elements be incorporated.

With regard to the loss of commercially designated land that will result from this rezoning application, the 2017 review of the OCP Bylaw determined that the Town currently possesses a significant amount of commercially zoned land (estimated to be approximately 13% of the land base at that time).

Staff consider this amount to be excessive to the current and future needs of the Town and that the removal of the subject property from the commercial land base is unlikely to adversely affect the local economy.

Staff further note that the development proposal approved by Council in 2007 for this site only contemplated a maximum commercial footprint of 945 m2, which is negligible in the overall context of commercial land within the Town.

Staff further support the proposed number of on-site vehicle parking spaces by bedroom (i.e. 1.5 for units with more than two, 1.25 for units with less than two) and maximum building height for the site of 14.7 metres above 301.85 metres (GSC datum) as these are seen to be consistent with the direction previously provided by Council for this site in 2007.

On this latter requirement, staff do consider that prior to the submission of a Development Permit for the proposed development, a detailed review of the Transport Canada regulations should be conducted by the applicant to ensure that the proposed height of the building will not interfere with the flight path of the Oliver Airport.

Regarding the proposed increase in Floor Area Ratio (FAR) from the 0.6 permitted under the C2s Zone to the 0.9 permitted under the proposed RH1s Zone without the capturing of an amenity contribution in the form of $40.00 (adjusted for inflation) / m2 of additional floor space, staff note that the 2007 development proposal was to be market-based with no provision of affordable housing units.

By comparison, the currently proposal is understood to be primarily non-market based housing specifically targeted towards individuals based on income (i.e. 20% units will be “at income assistance rate – low income deep subsidy units”). On this basis, staff are not recommending that an amenity contribution be sought from the applicant.

General:

Organizational:

Financial:

Legal/Statutory Authority:

Strategic Plan:

BACKGROUND:

Site Context: The subject property was created by a plan of subdivision that was deposited with the Land Title Office in Kamloops on November 3, 2006, and is approximately 5,794 m2 in area and is bounded by Airport Street to the west, Packinghouse Lane to the north and Similkameen Avenue to the south. The property is currently undeveloped (i.e. vacant land).

The surrounding pattern of development is seen to be comprised of commercial to the east (Oliver Place Mall), industrial to the north (BC Tree Fruits) and institutional to the south (Oliver Airport and Oliver Fire & Rescue).

Regulatory Provisions: Under the Town’s Official Community Plan Bylaw 1370, the subject property is designated Commercial Highway (CH), an objective of which is to “support a vibrant local economy by encouraging a wide range of commercial uses for both residents and visitors.”

In comparison, an objective of the proposed HR land use designation is to “provide for a variety of housing types and tenures to meet the socio-economic needs of the community, including seniors and those with special housing needs” and to also “encourage opportunities for affordable housing.”

Under the Town’s Zoning Bylaw 1380, the intent of the C2 Zone is “to provide a zone for general commercial activities in an area that is transitioning to highway commercial development.”

In comparison, the intent of the proposed RH1 Zone is to “provide a zone for comprehensively designed medium profile multiple attached housing.”

Of note, the C2s Zone that applies to the subject property contains the following regulations:

• residential development may occur at the ground floor level provided that commercial development occurs along the Airport Street frontage;

• maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is limited to 0.6 but may be increased to 1.2 if a payment of $40.00 / m2 of additional floor area above 0.6 FAR is made to the Town for specified community amenities or non-profit affordable housing initiatives;

• the maximum height of a building or structure shall not exceed 14.7 metres above 301.85 metres (GSC datum);

• parking requirements for residential dwellings shall be 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit with 2 bedrooms or more and 1.25 parking spaces per dwelling unit with less than 2 bedrooms; and

• a parcel line setback from Airport Street of 3.0 metres for commercial development and 6.0 metres for residential above the ground floor or 18.0 metres for residential development at grade.

REFERRALS:

Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (MoTI) is required prior to adoption of Amendment Bylaw 1380.08 as the proposed amendment will apply to lands within 800 metres of a “controlled area” (i.e. Highway 97).

Pursuant to Section 476 of the Local Government Act, Council must consult with the relevant School District when proposing to amend an OCP for an area that includes the whole or any part of that School District. In this instance, School District No. 53 has been made aware of the proposed amendment bylaw.

Pursuant to Section 477 of the Local Government Act, after first reading Council must consider the proposed OCP amendment in conjunction with the Town’s current financial and waste management plans. The proposed OCP amendment has been reviewed by the Public Works Department and Finance Department, and it has been determined that the proposed bylaw is consistent with the Town’s current waste management plan and financial plan.

PUBLIC PROCESS:

Under the Town’s Land Use Procedures Bylaw 1367, “Council may require that a public information meeting be held prior to consideration of an Amendment Application … if it considers the proposal to be of a significant scale or nature warranting an additional opportunity for the public to access information and inquire about the proposal beyond that available through the regular application referral and public hearing process.”

The Land Use Procedures Bylaw also provides additional criteria for the triggering of such a meeting such as the need for an OCP amendment or a significant land use change.

In this instance, staff consider the scope of the proposed amendments and resulting land use to warrant a public information meeting as an OCP change is required, the change from a Commercial (C) to a High Density Residential (HR) land use is seen to be significant and that the public should be provided with an opportunity to inquire about the proposal prior to a formal public hearing process.

For these reasons, staff are recommending that a public information meeting be held prior to 2nd reading of the amendment bylaws and the scheduling of a public hearing.

Should Council concur with this recommendation, staff are further recommending that such a meeting along with formal referral to the agencies listed at Attachment No. 1 should be considered appropriate consultation for the purpose of Section 475 of the Local Government Act,. As such, this process will be sufficiently early and does not need to be further ongoing.

All referral comments received to date from this consultation process are included as items in the Council Agenda.

COUNCIL REPORT/RESOLUTION HISTORY:

At its meeting of October 9, 2007, Council adopted Amendment Bylaw No. 1183, which amended the zoning of the subject property from the (then) Commercial Centre (C2) to Commercial Centre Site Specific (C2s).

The purpose of this amendment was to facilitate the development of “a four story mixed use commercial / residential development” on the property that was described as comprising 945 m2 of retail / commercial space on the main floor adjacent to Airport Street and 39 multi-family dwellings which ranging in size from 102.0 m2 to 144.0 m2 in area with 64 on-site vehicle parking spaces being provided in an underground parkade and a surface parking lot of 12 spaces. For reference purposes, the site plan and building elevation concept considered by Council in 2007 are included at Attachment Nos. 10 & 11 to this report.

With regard to some of the site specific regulations introduced through this rezoning, Council was advised that “the increase in the FAR above the 0.6 allowed in the C2 zone is considered bonus density and the proposed bylaw amendment will allow the Town of Oliver to collect a per square metre charge on the bonus density in an amount similar to the bonus density charge used in another recently approved zoning amendment.”

Similarly, Council was advised that “the proposed bylaw amendment establishes a parking requirement for the multi-family component similar to the parking requirements established for another recently adopted multi-use development.”

It is no longer known which similar development(s) where informing staff’s recommendations regarding density bonuses and vehicle parking requirements.

CAO COMMENTS:

I concur with the recommendation of the Contract Planner,

Respectfully Submitted:

______Chris Garrish Contract Planner

Approved By: Department: Status: Cathy Cowan, Chief Administrative Officer Administration Approved - 03 Jul 2019

Attachment No. 1 – Agency Referral List

Referrals to be sent to the following departments and agencies as highlighted with a , prior to Council considering first reading of Official Community Plan Amendment Bylaw No. 1370.07:

 Interior Health Authority  Chief Administrative Officer

Ministry of Environment  Public Works

TRUE Consulting Ltd.  Corporate Officer

Agricultural Land Commission  Oliver Fire Department

Integrated Land Management Bureau  Building Inspector

Ministry of Agriculture & Lands  Chief Financial Officer

Ministry of Transportation and   Oliver Parks and Recreation Infrastructure

Ministry of Community, Sport and Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Cultural Development Resource Operations (Archeology Branch)

 Fortis  Osoyoos Indian Band

 Eastlink  RCMP

RDOS  School District No. 53.

Oliver Airport Advisory Standing   Telus Committee Attachment No. 2 – Context Maps

Subject Property Attachment No. 3 – Site Photos (Google Streetview)

Similkameen Avenue Frontage

Packinghouse Lane Frontage Attachment No. 4 – Aerial Photo (2007)

Subject Property

OLIVER AIRPORT

TOWN WORK’S YARD Attachment No. 5 – Applicant’s Site Plan Attachment No. 6 – Applicant’s Main Floor Plan Attachment No. 7 – Applicant’s “Typical” Floor Plan Attachment No. 8 – Applicant’s Building Elevations (North, East & West) Attachment No. 9 – Applicant’s Building Elevations (South & Southeast) Attachment No. 10 – 2007 Site Plan (Reference Purposes Only) Attachment No. 11 – 2007 Proposed Building Elevations (Reference Purposes Only)

5931 AIRPORT ST, OLIVER – PARKING BRIEF INTRODUCTION

The development team is pursuing rezoning of the site at 5931 Airport St. (the Project) in Oliver from C2 to better align with the use and density planned on site. It is understood that the proposed parking provision is 1.65 stalls per unit on site. The purpose of this brief is to provide a rationale for why this level of parking provision will meet the needs of future tenants of this project. Figure 1 includes a selective street map of the Town of Oliver highlighting the Project site and surrounding amenities and facilities.

PARKING PROVISION ON SITE It is understood by the development team and the future owner and operator of the site, M’akola Housing Society (M’akola), that a total of 76 5931 Airport St Affordable Housing Project parking spaces will be provided for this affordable Number of Units 46 housing project. This represents 1.65 parking stalls per dwelling unit. Based on M’akola’s Parking Provided 76 extensive experience operating housing in both Total Parking per Unit 1.65 stalls per unit large and small communities, anecdotal evidence from BC Housing, and best practices in the affordable housing industry we believe this level of parking provision will meet the needs of future tenants. Below are the five points included in this parking brief:

1. ANTICIPATED PARKING DEMAND FOR THE 5931 AIRPORT ST. PROJECT Based on the parameters of the funding program under which this project was awarded, it is understood that the project will have the following mix of rents and incomes within the building:

 30% of units at moderate income – affordable market rents for households with an income limit of either $71,810 (couples without children in BC) or $107,000 (families with children in BC);  50% of units at Rent Geared to Income (RGI) – low income based on Housing Income Limits; and  20% of units at income assistance rate – low income deep subsidy units.

Based on anecdotal information directly from BC Housing it is understood that future tenants at the income assistance rate simply cannot afford a car. It is also understood that those paying RGI rates possess a household income that dictates no more than 1 car per household, and moderate incomes that have a strong likelihood to have 1 or more car per household.

The table below outlines what the above parking demand assumptions for the proposed mix of rents and incomes within the building result for this project.

5931 Airport St Affordable Housing Project 30% at moderate 50% at RGI 20% income Total income assistance rate Number of Units 14 23 9 46 Parking Demand 28 23 0 51 Total Parking 2 stalls per unit 1 stall per unit 0 1.11 stalls per Demand Per Unit unit Based on the anticipated total parking demand for this project, it is understood that 1.65 parking stalls per dwelling unit will surpass the demand of future tenants of this project.

2. M’AKOLA OPERATING EXPERIENCE Two of M’akola’s most recently completed housing developments, Hope Center in the District of Sooke and the Braidwood Housing Project in the City of Courtenay are both examples of affordable housing projects providing less parking per unit than is proposed for the 5931 Airport St. project. Both example projects fully meet the needs of the tenants who live there.

Both Courtenay (population of app. 25,000) and Sooke (population of app. 13,000) represent smaller communities that may offer a useful comparison for this project. See below Table for more information.

Table 1: Parking Provision from Current M'akola Operations Number of Units Parking Provided Total Parking per Unit Hope Center, Sooke 25 7 0.28 stalls per unit Braidwood, Courtenay 35 10 0.29 stalls per unit 3. TRANSPORTATION AMENITIES PROVIDED NEARBY THE PROJECT

The location of the Project is well connected to Community Amenity/ Facility Distance from Site (meters) several community amenities and facilities Pharmacy 300m allowing for active transportation methods, such as walking or cycling, and less of reliance Health Services 600m on cars thereby reducing the need for parking. Community Center 1km Table 2 below shows the distance (within 1 Daycare 1km kilometer, or a 15 minute walk) to community. Commercial Services 300m

School 1km

Entertainment 700m

Library 600m Table 2: Walkability Distances

Page 1 of 3

4. DECREASED PARKING DEMANDS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Based on existing BC Housing projects of similar scale and location, it is anticipated that the demand for parking by future tenants of the Project will not exceed the parking to be provided. Current policy/bylaw in several communities echo this understanding, including those completed by the City of Kamloops, City of Vancouver, and City of Victoria. The City of Kamloops Affordable Housing Developer Package, for example, states that based on parking demand trends, social housing parking requirements are 0.25 spots per unit.1 For the Airport Street project, this would result in a requirement of 24 parking spots. A scan of parking uptake from affordable housing projects in Penticton was carried out to establish parking uptake in affordable housing developments. The below Table shows that of project examples shown, only 39% of the parking stalls provided are in use.

Table 3: Housing Project Parking Uptake in Other Cities in the Interior City Building Name # of Units # of Stalls in Use % of Stalls in Use

Penticton Creekside Terrace 34 28 82% Penticton Reeds Corner 20 6 30%

Penticton Tower Apartments 124 36 29%

Total 178 70 39%

5. HOUSING AGREEMENT AND COVENANT ON TITLE Pathways and BC Housing are committed to the long-term provision of affordable housing with the Project. Therefore, both parties are prepared to secure an extended housing tenure through a housing agreement with a covenant registered on title to ensure the ongoing affordability of the proposed units. This will guarantee that the Project is operated and maintained as affordable housing in a manner that is consistent with the objective of protecting long-term affordability.

1 Kamloops Affordable Housing Developers Package, City of Kamloops (2016)

Page 1 of 3

TOWN OF OLIVER BYLAW 1370.07

A Bylaw to Amend The Town of Oliver’s Official Community Plan Bylaw 1370

The Council of the Town of Oliver, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Official Community Plan Amendment Bylaw 1370.07.”

2. The Official Community Plan Map, being Schedule ‘B’ of the Town of Oliver Official Community Plan (OCP) Bylaw No. 1370 is amended by changing the land use designation of the parcel described as Lot 1, Plan KAP38137, District Lot 2450S, SDYD, Except Plan KAP51368, KAP67667 & KAP82324, and shown shaded yellow on Schedule ‘A’, which forms part of this bylaw, from Commercial Highway (CH) to High Density Residential (HR).

3. The Form and Character Development Permit Areas Map, being Schedule ‘F’ of the Town of Oliver Official Community Plan (OCP) Bylaw No. 1370 is amended by changing the development permit area designation of the parcel described as Lot 1, Plan KAP38137, District Lot 2450S, SDYD, Except Plan KAP51368, KAP67667 & KAP82324, and shown shaded yellow on Schedule ‘B’, which forms part of this bylaw, from Commercial to Multiple Family.

Read a first and second time on the _____ day of ______, 2019.

Public hearing held on the _____ day of ______, 2019.

Read a third time the _____ day of ______, 2019.

Adopted the _____ day of ______, 2019.

______Mayor Corporate Officer Official Community Plan Amendment Bylaw No. 1370.07 Page 2

Schedule ‘A’

Amend Schedule ‘B’ of OCP Bylaw 1370: CO-OP AVENUE from: Commercial Highway (CH) to: High Density Residential (HR) (YELLOW SHADED AREA) N

SIMILKAMEEN AVENUE

MAIN STREET AIRPORT STREET Schedule ‘B’

Amend Schedule ‘F’ of OCP Bylaw 1370: CO-OP AVENUE from: Commercial Development Permit Area to: Multiple Family Development Permit Area (YELLOW SHADED AREA) N

SIMILKAMEEN AVENUE

MAIN STREET AIRPORT STREET TOWN OF OLIVER BYLAW 1380.08

A Bylaw to Amend The Town of Oliver’s Zoning Bylaw 1380

The Council of the Town of Oliver, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Zoning Amendment Bylaw 1380.08.”

2. The Town of Oliver Zoning Bylaw 1380 is amended by: i) by replacing sub-section b) under Section 14.2.11 (Site Specific Commercial Highway (C2s) Regulations) in its entirety with the following: b) deleted.

ii) by replacing sub-section a) under Section 12.1.11 (Site Specific Residential High Density One (RH1s) Regulations) in its entirety with the following: a) in the case of land described as Lot 1, Plan KAP38137, District Lot 2450S, SDYD, Except Plan KAP51368, KAP67667 & KAP82324 (5931 Airport Street), and shown shaded yellow on Figure 12.1.11(a): i) despite Section 12.1.8, the maximum height of a building or structure shall be 14.7 metres above 301.85 metres (GSC datum). The height of any building shall be designed in a manner that does not contravene Transport Canada safety requirements and airport operations. ii) despite Section 8.2 (Calculation of Off-Street Vehicle Parking and Loading Spaces), the parking requirements for an apartment building or townhouse shall be as follows: .1 1.5 parking space per dwelling unit with 2 bedrooms or more; and .2 1.25 parking space per dwelling unit with less than 2 bedrooms. Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 1380.08 Page 2

Residential High Density One Site Specific (RH1s) (YELLOW SHADED AREA)

Figure 12.1.111(a)

3. The Zoning Bylaw Map, being Schedule ‘B’ of the Town of Oliver Zoning Bylaw No. 1380 is amended by changing the land use designation of the parcel described as Lot 1, Plan KAP38137, District Lot 2450S, SDYD, Except Plan KAP51368, KAP67667 & KAP82324, and shown shaded yellow on Schedule ‘A’, which forms part of this Bylaw, from Highway Commercial Site Specific (C2s) to Residential High Density One Site Specific (RH1s).

Read a first and second time on the _____ day of ______, 2019.

Public hearing held on the _____ day of ______, 2019.

Read a third time the _____ day of ______, 2019.

Approved pursuant to Section 52(3) of the Transportation Act this _____ day of ______, 2019.

Adopted the _____ day of ______, 2019.

______Mayor Corporate Officer Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 1380.08 Page 3

Schedule ‘A’

CO-OP AVENUE Amend Zoning Bylaw 1380: from: Highway Commercial Site Specific (C2s) to: Residential High Density One Site Specific (RH1s) (YELLOW SHADED AREA) N

SIMILKAMEEN AVENUE

SIMILKAMEEN AVENUE MAIN STREET

AIRPORT STREET 345

340 345

335 340

95th STREET

335 330

330 325 OBSTACLE LIMITATION SURFACE 20% TRANSITION SURFACE CLEARANCE HEIGHT ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL (TYP)

325 320

320

315

APPROX. 14.5m CLEARANCE

346th AVE 315

EX. GROUND CONTOURS (TYP) 310 FROM OWNER SUPPLIED DATA 310

10% DIVERGENCE

305 CODE 1A NON-INSTRUMENT 30m RUNWAY STRIP

APPROX. 7m CLEARANCE

RUNWAY 18 THRESHOLD

30.0 ELEVATION 303.92 30.0 5% TAKE-OFF / APPROACH SURFACE

RUNWAY 18 - 36 310 320 305 315 30.0

) CODE 1A NON-INSTRUMENT 30m RUNWAY STRIP 305

10% DIVERGENCE RUDNISKI, MIKE APPROX. 6.8m CLEARANCE 310 (BY: (SEE NOTE 1.)

310

315 November 24, 2017 - 7:05:18 am ] C1.0 [

315

20% TRANSITION SURFACE 320

CLIENT NOTES: OBSTACLE LIMITATION SURFACE REVIEW 1. TRANSPORT CANADA AERODROME STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES TP312 4th EDITION CLAUSE 4.3.1.3 REQUIRES RUNWAY 18 APPROACH MINIMUM 4.3m CLEARANCE BETWEEN CROWN OF ROAD AND THE OLS.

EXISTING OBSTACLE LIMITATION SURFACE CONDITIONS

PROJECT No. OFFICE DES CKD REV DRAWING 0 25m A 17/11/23 ISSUED FOR REVIEW TRN.AIRP03133-02 Kelowna KSA KSA A NUM DATE DWN CKD APR DESCRIPTION REV DATE APR DESCRIPTION Scale: 1:750 @ 22"x34" DATE: SHEET No. DWN APP STATUS C1.0 REVISIONS DRAWING STATUS PERMIT PROFESSIONAL SEAL November 22, 2017 1 of 2 MER IFR K:\CAU3 - OLIVER AIRPORT\OLS REVIEW 2017\Design\AIRP03133-02 OLS C1.0 EX OLS.dwg From: Danielson, Steven To: Planning Department Subject: Airport St, 5931 Oliver (Z-2019-03) Date: May-29-19 9:53:09 AM Attachments: image003.jpg

With respect to the above noted file,

There are FortisBC Inc (Electric) (“FBC(E)”) primary distribution facilities along Airport Street. Based on the plans submitted, space has been allocated for onsite transformation, however it is unclear whether the space shown is adequate to service the proposed development. It is recommended that FBC(E) be contacted as soon as possible to determine servicing and land rights requirements for the proposed design. The applicant is responsible for costs associated with any change to the subject property's existing service, if any, as well as the provision of appropriate land rights where required.

For more information, please refer to FBC(E)’s overhead and underground design requirements: FortisBC Overhead Design Requirements http://fortisbc.com/ServiceMeterGuide

FortisBC Underground Design Specification http://www.fortisbc.com/InstallGuide

In order to initiate the design process, the customer must call 1-866-4FORTIS (1-866-436-7847). Please have the following information available in order for FBC(E) to set up the file when you call. • Electrician’s Name and Phone number • FortisBC Total Connected Load Form • Other technical information relative to electrical servicing

Otherwise, FBC(E) has no concerns with this circulation.

It should be noted that additional land rights issues may arise from the design process but can be dealt with at that time, prior to construction. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at your convenience.

Best Regards,

Steven Danielson, AACI, SR/WA Contract Land Agent for:

Nicholas Mirsky, B.Comm., AACI, SR/WA Supervisor | Property Services | FortisBC Inc.

2850 Benvoulin Rd Kelowna, BC V1W 2E3 Office: 250.469.8033 Mobile: 250.718.9398 Fax: 1.866.636.6171 [email protected]

This email was sent to you by FortisBC*. The contact information to reach an authorized representative of FortisBC is 16705 Fraser Highway, Surrey, British Columbia, V4N 0E8, Attention: Communications Department. You can unsubscribe from receiving further emails from FortisBC by emailing [email protected].

*”FortisBC” refers to the FortisBC group of companies which includes FortisBC Holdings. Inc., FortisBC Energy Inc., FortisBC Inc., FortisBC Alternative Energy Services Inc. and Fortis Generation Inc.

This e-mail is the property of FortisBC and may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. FortisBC does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and delete all copies of the message including removal from your hard drive. Thank you. RESPONSE SUMMARY File: Z-2019-10

Approval Recommended for Reasons x Interests Unaffected by the Outlined Below Permit

Approval Recommended Subject to Approval Not Recommended Conditions Below Due to Reasons Outlined Below

Corporate Officer Signed by: Title: Town of Oliver Date: May 10, 2019 Agency:

Please Respond to: Diane Vaykovich, Corporate Officer: [email protected] From: Michael MacDougall To: Planning Department Cc: William Hum Subject: RE: Referral - Zoning Amendment Bylaw 1380.08/OCP Amendment Bylaw1370.07 Date: May 10, 2019 10:27:39 AM

Eastlink does not have any concern

Michael MacDougall | Team Lead System Designer Eastlink | Engineering [email protected] T: 902.431.5111

From: Planning Department [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: May-10-19 2:23 PM To: Diane Vaykovich ; Matt Saunders Subject: Referral - Zoning Amendment Bylaw 1380.08/OCP Amendment Bylaw1370.07

You are requested for comment on the proposed amendments to Zoning Bylaw 1380 and Official Community Plan Bylaw by June 7, 2019.

Supportive documents can be accessed at http://www.oliver.ca/forms-documents

If no response is received, it will be assumed your interests are not affected.

Thank you,

This Communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal and/ or privileged information. Please contact the sender immediately if you are not the intended recipient of this communication and do not copy, distribute or take action relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed.

From: Doug Leahy To: Planning Department Subject: RE: Referral - Zoning Amendment Bylaw 1380.08/OCP Amendment Bylaw1370.07 Date: May 10, 2019 10:53:40 AM

I do not believe finance interests are affected.

From: Planning Department Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 10:23 AM To: Diane Vaykovich ; Matt Saunders Subject: Referral - Zoning Amendment Bylaw 1380.08/OCP Amendment Bylaw1370.07

You are requested for comment on the proposed amendments to Zoning Bylaw 1380 and Official Community Plan Bylaw by June 7, 2019.

Supportive documents can be accessed at http://www.oliver.ca/forms-documents

If no response is received, it will be assumed your interests are not affected.

Thank you,

From: Danielson, Steven To: Planning Department Date: May 29, 2019 9:53:09 AM

With respect to the above noted file,

For more information, please refer to FBC(E)’s overhead and underground design requirements: FortisBC Overhead Design Requirements http://fortisbc.com/ServiceMeterGuide

FortisBC Underground Design Specification http://www.fortisbc.com/InstallGuide

Otherwise, FBC(E) has no concerns with this circulation.

Best Regards,

Steven Danielson, AACI, SR/WA Contract Land Agent for:

Nicholas Mirsky, B.Comm., AACI, SR/WA Supervisor | Property Services | FortisBC Inc.

2850 Benvoulin Rd Kelowna, BC V1W 2E3 Office: 250.469.8033 Mobile: 250.718.9398 Fax: 1.866.636.6171 [email protected]

Your File #: eDAS File #: 2019-02561 Date: May 10, 2019

Town of Oliver 6150 Main Street PO Box 638 Oliver, BC V0H 1T0

Attention: Diane Vaykovich, Corporate Officer

Re: Proposed Zoning Amendment Bylaw 1380.08, 2019 for: Lot 1, District Lot 2450s, SDYD, Plan KAP38137 except Plans KAP51368, KAP67667 & KAP82324 - 5931 Airport Street, Oliver, BC

Preliminary Approval is granted for the rezoning for one year pursuant to section 52(3)(a) of the Transportation Act.

If you have any questions please feel free to call Rob Bitte at (250) 490-2280.

Yours truly,

Rob Bitte District Development Technician

Local District Address Penticton Area Office 102 Industrial Place Penticton, BC V2A 7C8 Canada Phone: (250) 712-3660 Fax: (250) 490-2231 H1183P-eDAS (2009/02) Page 1 of 1

From: Rob Lachance To: Planning Department Cc: Sukhdeep Mahal Subject: RE: Referral - Zoning Amendment Bylaw 1380.08/OCP Amendment Bylaw1370.07 Date: May-16-19 6:31:45 AM Attachments: image002.png image001.jpg

Hello, TELUS has no objection to the proposed change to the Bylaw.

Cheers

Rob Lachance TELUS Outside Plant Engineering Technician (CTech) 1090 Manhattan Drive Kelowna BC Canada V1Y 9X9

250-717-4572 LAND Line 250-215-6641 Cell 250-763-8947 Fax 1-800-928-1322 Toll Free [email protected]

Optik TV: TV like you've never seen before

TELUS | the future is friendly®

This email, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by reply and destroy this email and any copies. Thank you.

From: Sukhdeep Mahal Sent: May 15, 2019 01:46 PM To: Rob Lachance Subject: FW: Referral - Zoning Amendment Bylaw 1380.08/OCP Amendment Bylaw1370.07

Hey Rob,

Not sure if this is supposed to be sent to Engineering for review. If you could please take a quick look and advise.

Thanks, Sukh Mahal

From: Planning Department [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: May 10, 2019 10:23 AM To: Diane Vaykovich ; Matt Saunders Subject: Referral - Zoning Amendment Bylaw 1380.08/OCP Amendment Bylaw1370.07

You are requested for comment on the proposed amendments to Zoning Bylaw 1380 and Official Community Plan Bylaw by June 7, 2019.

Supportive documents can be accessed at http://www.oliver.ca/forms-documents

If no response is received, it will be assumed your interests are not affected.

Thank you,