2016 Rotterdam Marathon Statistical Information
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2019 Tokyo Marathon Statistical Information
2019 Tokyo Marathon Statistical Information Tokyo Marathon All Time list Performance Time Performers Name Nat Place Date 1 2:03:58 1 Wilson Kipsang KEN 1 26 Feb 2017 2 2:05:30 2 Dickson Chumba KEN 1 25 Feb 2018 3 2:05:42 Dickson Chumba 1 23 Feb 2014 4 2:05:51 3 Gideon Kipketer KEN 2 26 Feb 2017 5 2:05:57 4 Tadese Tola ETH 2 23 Feb 2014 6 2:06:00 5 Endeshaw Negesse ETH 1 22 Feb 2015 7 2:06:11 6 Yuta Shitara JPN 2 25 Feb 2018 8 2:06:25 Dickson Chumba 3 26 Feb 2017 9 2:06:30 7 Sammy Kitwara KEN 3 23 Feb 2014 10 2:06:33 8 Stephen Kiprotich UGA 2 22 Feb 2015 11 2:06:33 9 Amos Kipruto KEN 3 25 Feb 2018 12 2:06:34 Dickson Chumba 3 22 Feb 2015 13 2:06:42 10 Evans Chebet KEN 4 26 Feb 2017 14 2:06:47 Gideon Kipketer 4 25 Feb 2018 15 2:06:50 11 Dennis Kimetto KEN 1 24 Feb 2013 16 2:06:54 12 Hiroto Inoue JPN 5 25 Feb 2018 17 2:06:56 13 Feyisa Lilesa ETH 1 28 Feb 2016 18 2:06:58 14 Michael Kipyego KEN 2 24 Feb 2013 19 2:06:58 Michael Kipyego 4 23 Feb 2014 20 2:07:05 15 Peter Some KEN 5 23 Feb 2014 21 2:07:20 16 Shumi Dechasa BRN 4 22 Feb 2015 22 2:07:22 Peter Some 5 22 Feb 2015 23 2:07:23 17 Viktor Röthlin SUI 1 17 Feb 2008 24 2:07:25 18 Markos Geneti ETH 6 22 Feb 2015 25 2:07:30 Feyisa Lilesa 6 25 Feb 2018 26 2:07:33 19 Bernard Kipyego KEN 2 28 Feb 2016 27 2:07:34 Dickson Chumba 3 28 Feb 2016 28 2:07:35 20 Hailu Mekonnen ETH 1 27 Feb 2011 29 2:07:37 Michael Kipyego 1 26 Feb 2012 30 2:07:37 21 Geoffrey Kamworor Kipsang KEN 6 23 Feb 2014 31 2:07:39 22 Masato Imai JPN 7 22 Feb 2015 32 2:07:39 23 Alfers Lagat KEN 5 26 Feb 2017 33 2:07:40 24 Deresa Chimsa -
Paul Tergat O Most Observers It Came As No Great Surprise Tergat: Thank You Very That Paul Tergat Produced a WR 2:04:55 in Much
T&FN INTERVIEW Paul Tergat o most observers it came as no great surprise Tergat: Thank you very that Paul Tergat produced a WR 2:04:55 in much. I knew that I had T Berlin. So great are the talents of this legendary the potential. I knew that I by Sean Hartnett Kenyan—be it on the track, harrier course or the had the ability for bringing roads—that he faced WR expectations in every one down the World Record for of his previous five marathons. Tergat steadfastly the marathon, maybe by a maintained that “the marathon is a completely few seconds. But it was a big different event and I have much to learn.” surprise for me to go under This says much about the 34-year-old Kenyan, 2:05. Whatever you have whose quest for running greatness is matched by been putting in—in terms his passion for knowledge on all fronts. When he of energy, in terms of mental is not training his days are filled with a multitude preparedness and physical of family, business, and charitable activities, all torture—it is sweet when you the while juggling a couple of active cell phones. have such great moments. Conversation with Tergat ranges easily from world T&FN: Many people pre- issues to athletics or his homeland, and is always dicted that you would be the spiced with a bit of humor. WR holder right off the bat. But While Tergat is the epitome of a Kenyan distance the marathon is a very difficult runner, he is far from typical and did not even event, and you have made slow begin his running career until he completed his step-by-step progress. -
RESULTS Half Marathon Men
/Cardiff University Cardiff (GBR) World Half Marathon Championships 26 March 2016 RESULTS Half Marathon Men RECORDS RESULT NAME COUNTRY AGE VENUE DATE World Record WR 58:23 Zersenay TADESE ERI 28 Lisboa 21 Mar 2010 Championships Record CR 58:59 Zersenay TADESE ERI 25 Udine 14 Oct 2007 World Leading WL 58:44 Solomon Kirwa YEGO KEN 29 Ostia Lido 13 Mar 2016 26 March 2016 14:10 START TIME 12° C 87 % TEMPERATURE HUMIDITY 16:29 END TIME 12° C 87 % PLACE BIB NAME COUNTRY DATE of BIRTH RESULT TIME BEHIND 1 559 Geoffrey Kipsang KAMWOROR KEN 22 Nov 92 59:10 SB 2 562 Bedan Karoki MUCHIRI KEN 21 Aug 90 59:36 SB + 26 3 538 Mohamed FARAH GBR 23 Mar 83 59:59 SB + 49 4 528 Abayneh AYELE ETH 04 Nov 87 59:59 PB + 49 5 531 Tamirat TOLA ETH 11 Aug 91 1:00:06 PB + 56 6 558 Simon CHEPROT KEN 02 Jul 93 1:00:12 SB + 1:02 7 523 Abrar OSMAN ERI 01 Jan 94 1:00:58 SB + 1:48 8 532 Mule WASIHUN ETH 20 Oct 93 1:01:11 SB + 2:01 9 560 Edwin Kiprop KIPTOO KEN 14 Aug 93 1:01:21 + 2:11 10 579 Stephen MOKOKA RSA 31 Jan 85 1:01:27 SB + 2:17 11 529 Teshome MEKONEN ETH 05 Aug 95 1:01:39 SB + 2:29 12 561 Edwin KIPYEGO KEN 16 Nov 90 1:01:52 + 2:42 13 521 Nguse AMLOSOM ERI 10 Nov 86 1:01:54 + 2:44 14 546 Paul POLLOCK IRL 25 Jun 86 1:02:46 SB + 3:36 15 540 Callum HAWKINS GBR 22 Jun 92 1:02:51 + 3:41 16 527 Guye ADOLA ETH 20 Oct 90 1:03:26 + 4:16 17 524 Hiskel TEWELDE ERI 15 Sep 86 1:03:26 SB + 4:16 18 526 Ayad LAMDASSEM ESP 11 Oct 81 1:03:29 SB + 4:19 19 534 Sidi-Hassan CHAHDI FRA 07 May 89 1:03:30 SB + 4:20 20 501 Michael SHELLEY AUS 10 Oct 83 1:03:33 SB + 4:23 21 590 Robert -
IMPRESSIONEN IMPRESSIONS Bmw-Berlin-Marathon.Com
IMPRESSIONEN IMPRESSIONS bmw-berlin-marathon.com 2:01:39 DIE ZUKUNFT IST JETZT. DER BMW i3s. BMW i3s (94 Ah) mit reinem Elektroantrieb BMW eDrive: Stromverbrauch in kWh/100 km (kombiniert): 14,3; CO2-Emissionen in g/km (kombiniert): 0; Kraftstoffverbrauch in l/100 km (kombiniert): 0. Die offi ziellen Angaben zu Kraftstoffverbrauch, CO2-Emissionen und Stromverbrauch wurden nach dem vorgeschriebenen Messverfahren VO (EU) 715/2007 in der jeweils geltenden Fassung ermittelt. Bei Freude am Fahren diesem Fahrzeug können für die Bemessung von Steuern und anderen fahrzeugbezogenen Abgaben, die (auch) auf den CO2-Ausstoß abstellen, andere als die hier angegebenen Werte gelten. Abbildung zeigt Sonderausstattungen. 7617 BMW i3s Sportmarketing AZ 420x297 Ergebnisheft 20180916.indd Alle Seiten 18.07.18 15:37 DIE ZUKUNFT IST JETZT. DER BMW i3s. BMW i3s (94 Ah) mit reinem Elektroantrieb BMW eDrive: Stromverbrauch in kWh/100 km (kombiniert): 14,3; CO2-Emissionen in g/km (kombiniert): 0; Kraftstoffverbrauch in l/100 km (kombiniert): 0. Die offi ziellen Angaben zu Kraftstoffverbrauch, CO2-Emissionen und Stromverbrauch wurden nach dem vorgeschriebenen Messverfahren VO (EU) 715/2007 in der jeweils geltenden Fassung ermittelt. Bei Freude am Fahren diesem Fahrzeug können für die Bemessung von Steuern und anderen fahrzeugbezogenen Abgaben, die (auch) auf den CO2-Ausstoß abstellen, andere als die hier angegebenen Werte gelten. Abbildung zeigt Sonderausstattungen. 7617 BMW i3s Sportmarketing AZ 420x297 Ergebnisheft 20180916.indd Alle Seiten 18.07.18 15:37 AOK Nordost. Beim Sport dabei. Nutzen Sie Ihre individuellen Vorteile: Bis zu 385 Euro für Fitness, Sport und Vorsorge. Bis zu 150 Euro für eine sportmedizinische Untersuchung. -
2010 New York Marathon Statistical Information Men New York Marathon All Time List
2010 New York Marathon Statistical Information Men New York Marathon All Time list Performances Time Performers Name Nat Place Date 1 2:07:43 1 Tesfaye Jifar ETH 1 4 Nov 2001 2 2:08:01 2 Juma Ikangaa TAN 1 5 Nov 1989 3 2:08:07 3 Rodger Rop KEN 1 3 Nov 2002 4 2:08:12 4 John Kagwe KEN 1 2 Nov 1997 5 2:08:17 5 Christopher Cheboiboch KEN 2 3 Nov 2002 6 2:08:20 6 Steve Jones GBR 1 6 Nov 1988 7 2:08:39 7 Laban Kipkemboi KEN 3 3 Nov 2002 8 2:08:43 8 Marilson Gomes dos Santos BRA 1 2 Nov 2008 9 2:08:45 John Kagwe 1 1 Nov 1998 10 2:08:48 9 Joseph Chebet KEN 2 1 Nov 1998 11 2:08:51 10 Zebedayo Bayo TAN 3 1 Nov 1998 12 2:08:53 11 Mohamed Ouaadi FRA 4 3 Nov 2002 13 2:08:59 12 Rod Dixon NZL 1 23 Oct 1983 14 2:09:04 13 Martin Lel KEN 1 5 Nov 2007 15 2:09:07 14 Abderrahim Goumri MAR 2 2 Nov 2008 16 2:09:08 15 Geoff Smith GBR 2 23 Oct 1983 17 2:09:12 16 Stefano Baldini ITA 5 3 Nov 2002 18 2:09:14 Joseph Chebet 1 7 Nov 1999 19 2:09:15 17 Meb Keflezighi USA 1 1 Nov 2009 20 2:09:16 Abderrahim Goumri 2 4 Nov 2007 21 2:09:19 18 Japhet Kosgei KEN 2 4 Nov 2001 22 2:09:20 19 Domingos Castro POR 2 7 Nov 1999 23 2:09:27 Joseph Chebet 2 2 Nov 1997 24 2:09:28 20 Salvador Garcia MEX 1 3 Nov 1991 25 2:09:28 21 Hendrick Ramaala RSA 1 7 Nov 2004 26 2:09:29 22 Alberto Salazar USA 1 24 Oct 1982 27 2:09:29 23 Willie Mtolo RSA 1 1 Nov 1992 28 2:09:30 24 Paul Tergat KEN 1 6 Nov 2005 29 2:09:31 Stefano Baldini 3 2 Nov 1997 30 2:09:31 Hendrick Ramaala 2 6 Nov 2005 31 2:09:32 25 Shem Kororia KEN 3 7 Nov 1999 32 2:09:33 26 Rodolfo Gomez MEX 2 24 Oct 1982 33 2:09:36 27 Giacomo -
Iaaf World Half Marathon Championships Kavarna 2012 Facts & Figures
IAAF WORLD HALF MARATHON CHAMPIONSHIPS KAVARNA 2012 FACTS & FIGURES Incorporating the IAAF World Half Marathon Championships (1992-2005/2008- 2010) & the IAAF World Road Running Championships 2006/2007 Past Championships...............................................................................................1 Past Medallists .......................................................................................................1 Overall Placing Table..............................................................................................5 Most Medals Won...................................................................................................6 Youngest & Oldest..................................................................................................7 Most Appearances by athlete.................................................................................7 Most Appearances by country................................................................................8 Competitorʼs Index ...............................................................................................10 World Road Race Records & Best Performances ...............................................33 Progression of World Record & Best Performances at Half Marathon ................35 KAVARNA 2012 ★ FACTS & FIGURES/PAST CHAMPS & MEDALLISTS 1 PAST CHAMPIONSHIPS –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– These totals have been adjusted from those previously published so that athletes entered for the championships -
IAAF DIAMOND LEAGUE MEETINGS 2016 Status Requirements and Regulations
IAAF DIAMOND LEAGUE MEETINGS 2016 Status Requirements and Regulations 1. General Principles 1.1 The IAAF Diamond League shall include the best invitational outdoor athletics meetings in the world. 1.2 Regulations governing the IAAF Diamond League shall be issued to the IAAF Diamond League Meeting Organisers (the Organiser) and may be amended every year by the IAAF, in agreement with Diamond League AG. 1.3 The precise requirements are defined hereunder. 1.4 Meeting Directors agree to respect all Rules, Regulations and decisions taken by the General Assembly of the Diamond League AG. 1.5 At least one person from the host country National Federation, selected in agreement with the Organising Committee, must be co-opted onto the Organising Committee for liaison purposes. 1.6 The IAAF Diamond League Calendar 2016 can be found in Appendix 1. 1.7 Formal Application for an IAAF Permit shall be submitted as follows: on the appropriate Application Form; countersigned by the Meeting Director and the host National Federation; by the deadline set by the IAAF. 1.8 No application shall be considered if Diamond League requirements were not met in 2015 and/or if they are not guaranteed for 2016. 2. Evaluation & Reporting 2.1 All IAAF Diamond League Meetings will undergo an annual evaluation on all aspects of their organisation following the system agreed by the Diamond League AG: level of the athletes competing, attendance of spectators; respect of these regulations; respect of all other IAAF and Diamond League Regulations (such as Television Production and Graphic Branding Guidelines); respect of the financial commitments towards the athletes; conduct of anti-doping measures; technical conduct of the competition; services provided to the athletes; Diamond League concept and office support; media services. -
Table of Contents
Media Table of contents Media information & fast facts ......................................................................................................... 3 Important media information ....................................................................................................................................................4 Race week Media Center..............................................................................................................................................................4 Race week schedule of events ..................................................................................................................................................7 Quick Facts ...........................................................................................................................................................................................8 Top storylines ......................................................................................................................................................................................10 Prize purse .............................................................................................................................................................................................13 Time bonuses ......................................................................................................................................................................................14 Participant demographics ............................................................................................................................................................15 -
Arkansas Men's Track & Field Media Guide, 2012
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Arkansas Men's Track and Field Athletics 2012 Arkansas Men's Track & Field Media Guide, 2012 University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Athletics Media Relations Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/track-field-men Citation University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Athletics Media Relations. (2012). Arkansas Men's Track & Field Media Guide, 2012. Arkansas Men's Track and Field. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/track- field-men/4 This Periodical is brought to you for free and open access by the Athletics at ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arkansas Men's Track and Field by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TABLE OF CONTENTS 2011 SEC OUTDOOR CHAMPIONS Index 1-4 History and Records 49-84 Table of Contents 1 Razorback Olympians 50-51 Media Information 2 Cross Country Results and Records 52-54 Team Quick Facts 3 Indoor Results and Records 55-61 The Southeastern Conference 4 Outdoor Results and Records 62-70 Razorback All-Americans 71-75 2011 Review 5-10 Randal Tyson Track Center 76 2011 Indoor Notes 6-7 John McDonnell Field 77 2011 Outdoor Notes 8-9 Facility Records 78 2011 Top Times and Honors 10 John McDonnell 79 Two-Sport Student Athletes 80 2012 Preview 11-14 Razorback All-Time Lettermen 81-84 2012 Outlook 12-13 2012 Roster 14 The Razorbacks 15-40 Returners 16-35 Credits Newcomers 36-40 The 2012 University of Arkansas Razorback men’s track and fi eld media guide was designed by assistant The Staff 41-48 media relations director Zach Lawson with writting Chris Bucknam 42-43 assistance from Molly O’Mara and Chelcey Lowery. -
2013 World Championships Statistics - Men’S Marathon by K Ken Nakamura
2013 World Championships Statistics - Men’s Marathon by K Ken Nakamura The records to look for in Moskva: 1) No nation ever swept the medal in the Worlds. Can ETH or KEN change that? 2) 2007 was the last time African born runner did NOT sweep the medal? Will Africans continue to dominate? All time Performance List at the World Championships Performance Performer Time Name Nat Pos Venue Year 1 1 2:06:54 Abel Kirui KEN 1 Berlin 2009 2 2:07:38 Abel Kirui 1 Daegu 2011 3 2 2:07:48 Emmanuel Mutai KEN 2 Berlin 2009 4 3 2:08:31 Jaouad Gharib MAR 1 Paris 2003 5 4 2:08:35 Tsegaye Kebede ETH 3 Berlin 2009 6 5 2:08:38 Julio Rey ESP 2 Paris 2003 7 6 2:08:42 Adhane Yemane Tsegay ETH 4 Berlin 2009 8 7 2:09:14 Stefano Baldini ITA 3 Paris 2003 9 8 2:09:25 Alberto Chaiça POR 4 Paris 2003 10 9 2:09:26 Shigeru Aburaya JPN 5 Paris 2003 11 10 2:09:29 Daniele Caimmi ITA 6 Paris 2003 12 11 2:10:03 Rob de Castella AUS 1 Helsinki 1983 13 12 2:10:06 Vincent Kipruto KEN 2 Daegu 2011 14 2:10:10 Jaouad Gharib 1 Helsinki 2005 15 13 2:10:17 Ian Syster RSA 7 Paris 2003 15 14 2:10:21 Christopher Isegwe TAN 2 Helsinki 2005 16 15 2:10:27 Kebede Balcha ETH 2 Helsinki 1983 18 16 2:10:32 Feyisa Lilesa ETH 3 Daegu 2011 19 17 2:10:35 Michael Kosgei Rotich KEN 8 Paris 2003 20 18 2:10:37 Waldemar Cierpinski GDR 3 Helsinki 1983 21 19 2:10:37 Hendrick Ramaala RSA 9 Paris 2003 22 20 2:10:38 Kjell-Erik Ståhl SWE 4 Helsinki 1983 22 21 2:10:38 Atsushi Sato JPN 10 Paris 2003 22 22 2:10:38 Lee Bong-Ju KOR 11 Paris 2003 25 23 2:10:39 Tsuyoshi Ogata JPN 12 Paris 2003 26 24 2:10:42 Agapius -
“Breasts Are Getting Bigger”. Where Is the Evidence?
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Mary's University Open Research Archive doi 10.4436/jass.94020 JASs Correspondence & Notes e-pub ahead of print Journal of Anthropological Sciences Vol. 94 (2016), pp. 1-8 “Breasts are getting bigger”. Where is the evidence? Nicola Brown1 & Joanna Scurr2 1) School of Sport, Health & Applied Science, St. Mary’s University, Waldegrave Rd, Twickenham, TW1 4SX, UK e-mail: [email protected] 2) Research Group in Breast Health, University of Portsmouth, Cambridge Rd, Portsmouth, PO1 2ER, UK Background they may be a different size in another which may impact bra sale statistics. It is also recog- Concerns over breast size have gained promi- nised that up to 100% of women are wearing the nence as progressively more research points to wrong-sized bra (Greenbaum et al., 2003). There an association between increased breast size is currently no objective, empirical evidence of and negative health implications. Larger breast secular increases in breast size. sizes are associated with a higher incidence of breast pain (Brown et al., 2014), postural issues (Findikcioglu et al., 2007) and body image dis- Review of available data satisfaction (Sarwer et al., 1998). It has been widely reported in the popular press that female In an attempt to investigate the evidence of breast size is increasing, however, empirical evi- a secular increase in breast size, we conducted a dence for this assertion is limited, with support comprehensive literature search to identify all for this notion stemming primarily from bra published bust circumference data, defined as sales. -
Do Women with Smaller Breasts Perform Better in Long Distance Running?
Do women with smaller breasts perform better in long distance running? Nicola Brown1 and Joanna Scurr2 1School of Sport, Health and Applied Science, St Mary’s University, Waldegrave Road, Twickenham, TW1 4SX, UK T: +44(0)20 8240 4821 F: +44(0)20 8240 4212 E: [email protected] 2Research Group in Breast Health, University of Portsmouth, Cambridge Rd, Portsmouth, PO1 2ER, UK. T: +44(0)23 9284 5161 E: [email protected] Corresponding author: Dr Nicola Brown Acknowledgments: This study was supported by funds received from St Mary’s University, Twickenham and the University of Portsmouth. We are grateful to the study volunteers for their participation. 1 Abstract Literature has established that a range of physiological, biomechanical and training variables influence marathon performance. The influence of anthropometric characteristics has also received attention. However, despite major marathons exceeding 40,000 participants and approximately a third of these runners being female, no data exist on the influence of the breast on running performance. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the impact of breast mass on marathon finish time. 168 of 321 female marathon runners contacted completed an on-line survey focusing on marathon performance during the 2012 London marathon. Participants were categorised as smaller (<500g, 54%) or larger breasted (>500 g, 46%). Regression analysis identified that 24% of marathon performance variance could be explained by BMI, but breast mass improved the model to explain 28% of performance variation. The model determined that for women with 32/34 or 36/38 underband, each increase in cup size equates to a performance decrement of 4.6 mins or 8.6 mins, equivalent to 34.4 minutes difference between a woman with 36A compared to 36DD breast size.