SFMTA 20-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

SFMTA.COM

Fiscal Year 2015 - Fiscal Year 2034

DRAFT FOR SFMTA BOARD APPROVAL AUGUST 18, 2015 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS OF TABLE

2 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY CAPITAL2034 SFMTA FY PLAN2015 DRAFT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PREFACE

1. INTRODUCTION 7 CONTENTS OF TABLE The Municipal Transportation Agency 7 Overview of the Capital Plan 9 SFMTA’s Capital Plan, Capital Improvement Program and Capital Budget 11 Relationship to Other Plans 12

2. OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS 19 Transportation Capital Committee 19 Criteria Development and Weighting 20 Capital Need Identification and Review 23 Prioritization of Capital Needs 28

3. CAPITAL PLAN INVESTMENT 31 Prioritization Findings 31 Capital Needs by Investment Type 32 3

4. NEXT STEPS FOR CAPITAL PLANNING 35 Capital Planning Process 35 Capital Project Development Lifecycle 37

APPENDICES 39 Appendix A. Capital Plan Prioritization Criteria 40 and Rating Scales Appendix B. Capital Program Capital Need 47 Priorities Appendix C. Capital Need Descriptions 62 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY CAPITAL2034 SFMTA FY PLAN2015 DRAFT PREFACE

4 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY CAPITAL2034 SFMTA FY PLAN2015

PREFACE

to deliver the Capital Plandescribesthecapitalinvestments needed transit, bicycling, andridesharing. walking, The SFMTA’s suchas to more sustainable modesoftransportation, by thecity’s communities to -issupported connect our partners, with regulate, network, andmaintainthetransportation (SFMTA) mission–to plan,build, operate, primary The SanFrancisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s economically vibrant andlivable city, Mayor Edwin Lee’s is acriticalelement increating andsustaining an capital investments. Recognizing that transportation Plan provides aninitialprioritization for future Guided by theSFMTA’s Strategic Plan,theCapital growth andimprove oflife thequality inSanFrancisco. reliable. Investments future are alsoneededto support systemto provide thatissafe and atransportation

Transit First Transit First Policy, people whichdirects Policy, includinginvestments transportation network, with our partners, to connect communities. to connect withourpartners, network, transportation We work together to plan, build, operate, regulate, andmaintainthe SFMTA Statement Mission San Francisco: Great city, Excellent Transportation Choices. SFMTA Vision and inthefuture. choices hasexcellent todaythat thecity transportation network inSanFrancisco,the transportation and ensure to continueis working to restore, enhance andexpand investments neededover 20years, thenext theSFMTA 20 years.the next Byidentifyingthetransportation the Capital Planto setofneedsover capture thenext To continue moving forward, theSFMTA hasupdated adding newelevators andescalators atMetro stations. traffic signals, improving maintenance facilities, and lanes,adding more updating bikeandtransit-only Zero, withelements that callfor redesigning streets, two majorprograms,support MuniForward and Vision in November 2014. Those fundsare beingusedto asPropositionObligation bond, known A,wasapproved San Francisco voters, thefirst$500millionGeneral needs. of thetransportation of Thanks to thesupport new revenue sources to address asignificant portion Transportation Task Force 2030recommended three DRAFT

SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN 5 PREFACE DRAFT CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1: CHAPTER

6 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY CAPITAL2034 SFMTA FY PLAN2015 use fixed-route SFMTA transit service. provides over individualsunable to whichserves paratransit services, historic streetcar andcablecar),in additionto overseeing San Francisco (motor coach, trolley coach, lightrail, manages fivetypes ofpublictransitin directly agency operations isproviding publictransportation. The The largest component of theSFMTA’s multi-modal representation by 18labororganizations. 6,000 employees isoneofthecity’s largest, with and prepare for thefuture. Our diverse team ofalmost tobased projects improve network thetransportation taxis, andplanimplement strategic, community- and traffic, andwalking, facilitate regulate bicycling largest publictransitsystem. We alsomanageparking Francisco (Muni),thenation’s MunicipalRailway eighth 100 years, we have keptpeoplemoving with theSan networks intheworld. Fortransportation more than and maintainsoneofthemost comprehensive The SFMTA plans, designs, builds, operates, regulates (SFMTA) inthecity. managesallground transportation the SanFrancisco Municipal Transportation Agency andCounty ofSan Francisco, oftheCity A department TRANSPORTATION AGENCY SANTHE FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL INTRODUCTION responsible for. 1 provides ofthecapital assetsSFMTA anoverview is that itcan operate inasafe andreliable manner. Figure Repair ($11.45 billion)to restore the system andensure alsohasongoingneeds for Statethe agency ofGood network, the operationofa diverse transportation significant addition In infrastructure. supporting to to say, thismovement ofpeople andgoodsrequires network ontheenvironment. Needless transportation complete ofthe streets andmanagetheimpacts projects and acquire funding, enhance pedestrian safety, create agenciesto manage andwithother city bus andferry), rail,transit modes(heavy commuter railroad, regional withtheregion thecity connect using four additional SFMTA withregional transitoperators partners that miles ofthecity’s growing Finally, network. bicycle the and stripingofroads, includingthosethatdefine215 safety,bicycle trafficenforcement andthepainting streets inregards to trafficcalming, pedestrianand isresponsible foragency themanagement ofpublic streets.946 milesofcity Besidemodesoftravel, the nearly 282,000street signs and1,200trafficsignals on metered spaces, garagesandlots, 40publicparking also managesallon-street including28,000 parking, more than225millionpassengersannually. The SFMTA 40 percent ofalltransit tripsintheregion; carrying DRAFT

SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN 7 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION DRAFT 8 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION FIGURE 1. SFMTA’S CAPITAL KEY JUNE OF 2015 AS ASSETS 281,000 Street Signs • 1,211Signalized Intersections • 1,088milesofStreets • • 40 Off- Street Garages 40Off- Parking • 28,862Parking Meters • 275,500On-Street Parking Spaces • • 15 milesof Transit Priority 25milesofOverhead Wires • 71milesofLightRail Tracks • 151LightRail Vehicles • • 311 Trolley Motor Coach 505Hybrid/Diesel Buses • and Lots Lanes 19Facilities for Operations, • • 35 Bicycling Sharing 35Bicycling • inCorrals Racks 202Bicycle • Racks 3,060Bicycle • Lanes, 215miles of Bicycle • 9milesofCable Car • Streetcars 35Historic • 40Cable Cars • Administration Maintenance & Stations Routes, andPaths Tracks and localfunding. to planforability and secure federal, state, regional, consistently stated capitalneedsare critical to SFMTA’s or program contained within it,having clear and guarantee fundingorapproval project ofany particular Plan. Althoughinclusion intheCapital Plandoesnot of the SFMTAon thegoalsand objectives Strategic plan. Allneedsinthe Capital Planare prioritized based applications rely upontheprograms describedinthis the agency’s priorities, investment decisions, andgrant safety issuesorto comply with newmandates. Allof staff-identified needs suchasthoseto address potential Transit Fleet Plan, andtheRealEstate Vision, aswell as the Pedestrian Safety Strategy, Strategy, the Bicycle the Plan,theState ofGoodRepairReport, Implementation by anumberofstrategies andprograms: MuniForward investment needsare basedontheanalysis provided of theagency’s potential capitalinvestment needs. These purpose oftheCapital Planisto identifyandprioritize all needs for whichfundinghasnotyet beencommitted. The financially unconstrained planandincludescapital capital needsfor years. theupcoming isa twenty It The Capital Planisthecatalogof SFMTA’s anticipated oflifequality itsresidents andvisitors enjoy. economic engine ofSanFrancisco, the andsupports improvements. The SFMTA isamajorcomponent ofthe plans andlocalregional transportation development stationarea efforts, plans, neighborhood San Francisco andregional agencies to coordinate Furthermore, engagescommunities around theagency OVERVIEW OF THE CAPITAL THE OF OVERVIEW PLAN the basisfor theSFMTA Capital Plan. to governing bodies. Figure 2provides of anoverview for capitalfunding needsandprioritizes delivery project Plan provides the basisfrom which SFMTA advocates advocate for the agency’s fundingneeds. The Capital used asaninputto otherplanning documentsandto the generalpublic. Additionally, the Capital Plan is andstakeholder groups, advocacy Departments, and bodies, and County ofSanFrancisco otherCity policy fundingagencies and local andregional transportation The Capital Planisusedby alllevels of SFMTA staff, repair investments. tofunding capitalprojects better allocate state ofgood andprioritizationcriteria formanagement practices capital assetdata.SFMTA continues to refine itsasset Program to manageandanalyze better detailed collect, development ofa Transportation Asset Management Enterprise AssetSystem Management andthe has beguntheimplementationofa comprehensive over year atwenty period. To achieve this goal, SFMTA inastate infrastructure of good repair transportation an average of$250millionperyear to maintainits 20years.the next SFMTA iscommitted to spending when theyreach thescheduledendoftheirlifecycle over andreplaceneeded to eliminate allassets thebacklog deferred investment andtheinvestment backlog level replacement costs. identifies theamountof This report capital assets, their replacement andestimated cycles thataccounts forRepair Report alloftheagency’s were identifiedin the SFMTA’s 2014State ofGood and investments over 20years. thenext These needs of theagency’s rehabilitation andreplacement needs A majorcomponent oftheCapital Planistheassessment DRAFT

SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN 9 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION DRAFT 10 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION SFMTA Rea l l Estate Visio n FIGURE 2. BASIS SFMTA FOR THE CAPITAL PLAN Table 1.Comparison ofSFMTA Capital Program Documents capital planningdocumentsisprovided in Table 1. Capital Plan,5-year CIP, 2-year Capital Budgetandother anticipated resources. Acomparison ofthe20-year Capital Budgetare restricted by projected fundingand term andstrategic goals, the5-year CIPandthe2-year meetitslong- needs identified helptheagency to Budget. Whereas theCapital Planincludesallcapital Improvement Program (CIP) andthe2-year Capital 5-yeardeveloping thefiscally-constrained Capital The 20-year Capital Planprovides thefoundation for BUDGET AND CAPITALIMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SFMTA’S CAPITAL CAPITAL PLAN, Red ReR aia ugt2yasAt least90% 2years Capital Budget Program Capital Improvement aia ln2 er Funding not 20years Capital Plan PLAN e d Tran Tra TTr rar a sit and n d TaxiTaTax a OnOOnl y La ne, Gree n Bi B ke L L ane ne on M er At least90% 5 years M TIMEFRAME arkearka rk t SttSt reet eet FUNDING LEVEL appropriated committed/ committed committed PROJECT PROJECT SFMTA TOTAL $21.4 $1.0 $3.3 needs become andshouldberemoved capital projects and timelines. Once includedintheCIP, thecapital five the next years, alongwith corresponding budgets areunderstanding ofwhichprojects plannedto occur in funding. Cumulatively, theseprovide thepublicwithan a Strategic Investment/Value Analysis for prioritizing five ofcapital year projections revenue sources, andusing reviewing thepriorities established intheCapital Plan, be includedintheCIP. Development oftheCIPincludes 90% ofitsfundingidentified orphase for theproject to in theCapital Plan.Secondly, musthave aproject atleast considered for fundingintheCIP, itmustfirstbeincluded available over afive year period. For aproject to be matches capitalneed prioritieswithprojected funding capital projects. oftransportation for delivery The CIP fiveThe CIPisafiscally-constrained yearfundingplan (CIP) SFMTA 5-year Capital Improvement Program S FMTA Capita l Improvement Program DRAFT 11 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION DRAFT 12 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Budget. Many ofthesameconditions for inclusionin have fullfundingplansto beincluded intheCapital appropriated by theSFMTA Board. Capital must projects constrained thatare capital projects adopted or The 2-year Capital Budgetrepresents alistoffinancially SFMTA 2-year Capital Budget SFMTA Board. will begin infall2015for approval inearly2016by the theFY2017-2021CIPupdate, which Plan willsupport repair investments over five thenext years. This Capital $3.3 billion,$1.5billionwillbededicated to state ofgood time initiatives suchaseducationalprograms. this Of investments, capitalprocurements, area plans, andone- investment of$3.3billion. This includesinfrastructure Board for inMay 2014,andincludes370projects atotal The FY2015-2019CIPwasadopted by theSFMTA most ready capitalimprovements. the SFMTA’sagencies to support and highestpriority funding, itconveys specific commitments from funding from theCapital Plan. While theCIPdoesnotguarantee HaigH i g tS ht S t tree e t CotCo Co nstrns st ucti i on year. be approved by theSFMTA Board by Aprilofeacheven years ofthe5-year CIP. The two-year capitalbudgetmust the 2-year Capitaltwo Budgetlargely basedonthefirst the 5-year CIPapplyto the2-year Capital Budget,with the usesfor theSFMTA Capital Plan. Governments (ABAG). Figure 3provides of anoverview Commission (MTC) andtheAssociation ofBay Area Plan) developed by theMetropolitan Transportation (SFCTA), andPlanBay Area (theRegional Transportation by theSanFrancisco County Transportation Authority Plan (theCountywide Transportation Plan) prepared also akeyinputto theSanFrancisco Transportation as well astheSanFrancisco 10-year is Capital Plan.It by SanFrancisco Mayor Lee’s Transportation Task Force, needsfor considerationcommunicate thetransportation and theBay Area. The SFMTA Capital Plan wasusedto funding prioritiesfor andCounty ofSanFrancisco theCity a keyrole andregional ininforming capital citywide identifying SFMTA’s long term capitalneeds, italsoplays asthebasis forNot onlydoestheCapital Planserve 2030 report. 2030 report. recommendsThe report aseriesoffunding safer streets throughout in its thecity Transportation investments to fund better roads, improved transitand infrastructure oftransportation recommended a package 2014MayorIn Lee’s Transportation Task Force TRANSPORTATION 2030 SAFE, AFFORDABLE AND RELIABLE RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS investment andCounty’s intheCity aging infrastructure. andtocapital infrastructure restore healthy levels of investments to maintain,repair, andimprove thecity’s year Capital Planon abiennialbasisfor allrecommended andCounty of San FranciscoThe City develops aten- enhancements andotherinfrastructure improvements. projects, expandedandenhanced bikeways, accessibility pedestrian safety enhancements, Munitrackreplacement new Munivehicles, transitstop and route upgrades, These improvement include:street projects repaving, investments identifiedinSan Francisco’s Capital Plan. by 2030. The fundswould gotoward majorcapital projects infrastructure hundreds oflocaltransportation measures thatwould provide almost$3billionto delivery CAPITAL (FY PLAN 2016-25) SAN OF FRANCISCO’S AND COUNTY CITY THE San Fran cisc o Ci ty H all included in this citywide Capital Plan. included inthiscitywide SFMTA’s department, As acity departments. needs are that address criticalcapitalneedsinallmajorCity setofimprovementfiscally-constrained projects These capitalinvestments represent and apractical measures andnewsources oflocalrevenue. San Francisco could achieve more withpotential bond from businessasusual and envisions howthat departs also containscapital needs. aSF Investment It Vision revenues that fundasignificant amount ofSFMTA’s changes,plan, aswell whichhelpgenerate aspolicy SFTP recommends adiverse investment andexpansion system withexisting andpotential newrevenues. The the SFCTA evaluated ways to improve thetransportation analysis, collaboration, and publicinput, interagency improving travel choices for allusers. Through detailed modes, operators, andnetworks together, withaviewto over 30years. thenext The SFTPbringsalltransportation system development andinvestmenttransportation in December 2013,is theblueprintfor SanFrancisco’s and adopted by the Transportation Authority Board by theSanFrancisco County Transportation Authority The SanFrancisco Transportation Plan(SFTP),prepared integrated transportation and land-use/housingstrategyintegrated transportation Governments, PlanBay Area is thelong-range Commission andthe Association of Bay Area Adopted in 2013by the Metropolitan Transportation SAN FRANCISCO TRANSPORTATION 2040 PLAN PLAN BAYPLAN 2040 AREA DRAFT 13 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION DRAFT

FIGURE 3. OVERVIEW OF THE USES FOR THE SFMTA CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1: CHAPTER

14

SFMTA 20-YeaYYearrC CaC pitap llP PPlann SFMTA FY 2015 - FY CAPITAL2034 SFMTA FY PLAN2015 San SSa SFMT n FFrFran Fra A Ca an n cisccis pita o TroTrT l TrT Improvement Pro r anspa nsp sps p orta ort rta t tiontiot ion n PlaPPl l a n g ram Tran S FMTA 2- spor po or tatitat pg yp year n2 on 2 Ca p 030 ital Bud get City Plan Ba andCounty o y Area 2040 f SanFrancisco’s Capital P lan DRAFT 15 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION DRAFT 16 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION final listisadopted by the MTC Commission. evaluation,including environmentalproject review, the in PlanBay Area. After MTC completes itsdetailed investment prioritiesissubmitted to MTC for evaluation approved by theSFCTA Board, thelistofrecommended inconsultationthe county withstakeholders. Once and program priorities within MTC’s target budgetfor The SFCTA thendevelops recommendations for project are oneway thatSFMTA satisfiestheseparameters. adopted goals. and supporting The Capital Plan andCIP used to readiness, evaluate project projects: planstatus, funds orafederal action. Three parameters project are state orfederal for seeking allprojects is mandatory listinPlanBay project Areathe financially-constrained during thePlanBay Area Call for Projects. in Inclusion local agenciesinsubmittinginvestment needsto MTC San Francisco, theSFCTA assistsSFMTA andother As (CMA) theCongestion Agency Management for challenges offuture populationgrowth. needsandadaptto the counties planfor transportation new planningprioritiesandhelpsBay Area citiesand four yearsevery to changing reflect conditions and SanFranciscocounty Bay Area. This roadmap isupdated reduce pollutioninthenine- transportation-related provide choices and more housingandtransportation agrowing economy,housing plansthatwillsupport it integrates land-use and long-range transportation, MTC, to prepare aSustainable Communities Strategy), 375 for Metropolitan PlanningOrganizations, including mandated document(to meettherequirement ofSB through 2040for theSanFrancisco Bay Area. Astate- S Baya an Fran rea a Bike cisc o Ba SSha ha y re S re e Ar e tati a on o n Ma nMa M rket ket SteStS ete t DRAFT 17 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION DRAFT CHAPTER OVERVIEW2: OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

18 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY CAPITAL2034 SFMTA FY PLAN2015 by thisdiverse committee. schedules, budgetsand fundingplansmust beapproved capital projects, orchanges to scopes, existing project for each oftheSFMTA’s 14CIP Programs areas. Allnew Capital PlanorCIPandiscomprised ofrepresentatives committee meetsmonthlyto consider changesto the Director of Transportation andhisExecutive Team. The prioritizing needsbased oncriteria establishedby the capital needsfor inclusionintheCapital Planand Budget. This responsibility includes approving new the 20-year Capital Plan, 5-year CIP, and2-year Capital responsible for developing, amendingandimplementing The Transportation Capital is Committee (TCC) processes to bothadoptandamend theCapital Plan. Capital Committee follows establishedpoliciesand needs. After completion ofthesesteps the Transportation and reviewing capitalneeds, andprioritizingcapital weighting criteria to prioritize capitalneeds, identifying defined through athree step process: developing and The capitalneedsincludedinthisCapital Planwere TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL COMMITTEE OVERVIEW OFTHEDEVELOPMENT PROCESS efficient useofstaffing andfinancial resources. process decision-making well-defined results inamore agency’s complete streets andmulti-modalgoals. This and developing thatmeetthe projects delivery project and recommend scopes project withthegoaloftimely SFMTA by creating aclearinghouseto review, revise The TCC allows for better integration project withinthe process usedto determine theagency’s capitalpriorities. understanding ofthetransparent decision-making Board andtheagency’s stakeholdershave aclear staff,Capital Plan and CIPensures thatagency the Proper managementanddevelopment oftheSFMTA’s ChuC h u rchrc chc h andan nd d Dubo ubo bob et t cce eet t rackracra ck rec r e onst t ruct rru ion ono n DRAFT 19 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS DRAFT

CRITERIA DEVELOPMENT AND safety improvement has not been identified. In addition to the capital investments identified in the Capital Plan, the WEIGHTING agency also undertakes training, education, enforcement and marketing efforts which also support achievement of The Capital Plan was last adopted by the SFMTA Board the SFMTA’s strategic goals. of Directors in October 2013. To kick off the update process the Executive Team established the capital need prioritization criteria based on agency plans, goals, and adopted policies, specifically the Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan establishes the goals, objectives, and metrics by which the agency will be measured from Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 through FY 2018. Figure 4 provides an overview of the Strategic Plan goals and criteria. The Executive Team established the relative importance of each criterion through the application of a pair-wise comparison technique. During a workshop, the directors used real-time information gathering to display criteria preferences, allowing them to immediately see the impact and trade-offs of the choices they made and express their judgments concerning the relative importance of 20 each individual pair of criteria. Figure 5 illustrates the capital need evaluation criteria and weights. SFMTSFMTMMTTAAS StS rateratraateegicgi PlanPll Based on the agency’s Strategic Plan, the capital need evaluation criteria are focused on the benefits that capital investments would contribute towards meeting the SFMTA’s strategic goals. The criteria are broad in nature as they are applied to a range of potential capital investments, from communications systems, to buses, to traffic signals, to transit expansion. While detailed definitions have been established for the criteria, given their broad nature, there can be overlap in the benefits provided. For example, improving the workplace may also improve safety even when the need for a specific SFMTA FY 2015 - FY CAPITAL2034 SFMTA FY PLAN2015 CHAPTER OVERVIEW2: OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

SunsnssetetT T unneunn l Figure 4.2015Prioritization Criteria by Strategic Plan 8 -Resource & Conservation Sustainability &7 -Efficiency Financial OF LIFEOF INSAN FRANCISCO AND QUALITY ENVIRONMENT GOAL 3: IMPROVE THE Other EnvironmentalOther Impacts 2 -Security 1 -Safety TRANSPORTATION GOAL 1: CREATE ASAFER BICYCLING, TAXI, AND CARSHARING TAXI,BICYCLING, CARSHARING AND GOAL 2: TRANSIT, MAKE WALKING, 5 -System Quality 3 -Reliability 4 -System Access 6 - Travel6 Time 11 - Workplace Quality 9 - Transparent Communications OUTSTANDING SERVICE WORKPLACE THAT DELIVERS GOAL 4: CREATE A 10 - Regulatory Compliance & 10 -Regulatory Risk Management Risk DRAFT 21 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS DRAFT 22 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Figure 5.2015Capital Plan Prioritization Efficiency & Financial Efficiency & Resource Conservationand Environmental Impacts Sustainability 6% 1% Transparent Communications Travel Time System Quality 5% 5% Workplace Quality 6% 9% System Access Regulatory Compliance & Risk Regulatory Compliance& 13% Management 4% Security 7% Reliability 23% Safety 21% other capital programs include elementsthat improve replacement of Paratransit vehicles. addition, most In boarding onto trains for thosewhoneed it,andregular boarding platforms at transitstops thatprovide level elevators at transit stations, highlevel constructing system, suchasinstalling of thetransportation This program focuses onenhancingtheaccessibility compliance withtheAmericans withDisabilitiesAct. seniors andpersons withdisabilities, andmaintains that improve system access for to thetransportation The Accessibility Program is dedicated to investments into thefollowing 14Capital Programs: system, SFMTA’stransportation Capital Planisorganized manage thecapitalneedsofsuchabroad andcomplex ofSFMTA. underthepurview of transportation To prioritization step. These capitalneedscover allmodes wasrequestedinformation prior to necessary the estimate information were reviewed andany additional the capitalneeddescriptions, justifications, and cost Real Estate Vision for the 21stCentury. Once complete, Strategy,Bicycle and State of Good RepairInventory plans, suchas the MuniForward Plan, Implementation and addnewcapitalneedsbasedon SFMTA’s formal or completed, refine previously identifiedneeds, remove thosecapitalneedsthathave beenfunded Capital Plan. focus ofthisupdateThe wasto primary to review theexistingcapitalneedsfrom theprevious were throughout theagency provided theopportunity CIP Program Managers, Project Managers, and staff ACCESSIBILITY CAPITAL NEED IDENTIFICATION & REVIEW IDENTIFICATION CAPITAL NEED

bulbs andcurb ramps. information, audible pedestriansignals, andpedestrian communications atstationssuch asaudible “next muni” vehicles, trolley coaches andmotor coaches, improved include accessibility features on all newlightrail system’sthe transportation accessibility. Examples ADA A Stat ion n Plat a fom om on M aarkear t St St t rrereet DRAFT 23 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS DRAFT 24 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS BBalBalbBa Bicy Bic MuniMunM alb cle oa P MetMeM Rack e ark oE E ro r s Stat E tat ast as t ion (MME(MM((M M M BoarB ) LiL LiL dingdin ght g ht t RaiRail Ra Pla ail l tfor DivD m isioisiiis sios n are identifiedintheSFMTA Strategy (2013). Bicycle and secure parking. bicycle These capitalinvestments sharing system, improvements intersection for bicycles, network andbicycle expansion oftheexistingbicycle tracks,separated cycle safety andspotimprovements, infrastructure. lanes and These includesnewbicycle ofSanFrancisco’sthe safety andcomfort bicycle network ofsafe routes,city-wide bicycle andto enhance ProgramThe Bicycle isdesigned to create acohesive, to accommodate growth. operating facilities aswell asacquisition ofnewfacilities of investments to rehabilitate andmodernize SFMTA’s Vision for the21stCentury, whichoutlines aprogram of thesecapital needsare identifiedinthe RealEstate increased operationaland financialefficiency. Many facilitiesto providestations, andotheragency for replacement of SFMTA’s buildings, yards, transit The Facility Program includestherehabilitation and Muni customer experience. investments innewtechnologysupports to improve the oftheMetro system. backbone The program also fiber network thatprovides theinternal communication and financialefficiency. Thisincludesmaintainingthe and enhance SFMTA’sexternally internal operational system andeaseofusethetransportation efficiency implementation ofITinfrastructure to improve the Program thedesign and Infrastructure supports (IT) The Communications andInformation Technology BICYCLE FACILITY COMMUNICATIONS & INFRASTRUCTURE IT busy intersections morebusy intersections people-friendly. neighborhood roads are Complete Streets andmaking from cartraffic,help protect peoplewalking ensuring street crossingto shorten distances. Such investments signals,and pedestrian activated andcorner bulb-outs refuge islands, speedtablesto calmtraffic, crosswalks include streetscape enhancements, street median improve ofwalking. thecomfort These capitalelements the safety improve ofpeoplewalking, street design, and focus, thePedestrianprimary Program seeksto improve With San Francisco’s Vision Zero goalasits policy to accommodate growth. operating facilitiesaswell asacquisition of new facilities of investments to rehabilitate andmodernize SFMTA’s Vision for the21stCentury, whichoutlinesaprogram of thesecapitalneedsare identifiedintheRealEstate increased operational andfinancialefficiency. Many facilitiesto providestations, andotheragency for replacement ofSFMTA’s buildings, yards, transit The Facility Program includes the rehabilitation and Transit adopted in2013. Fleet Plan(TFMP) Management transit revenue fleetneedsare documented inthe Equipment andRail Training Simulators. The long-term is alsoincluded, suchasOn-Board Fare Collection vehicles.non-revenue Specialfleetequipment (support) maintenance, andexpansion ofrevenue (transit)and The Fleet Program focuses onthereplacement, PEDESTRIAN PARKING FLEET New Ferr PaPar Park w y Bu in Flye g ye

Mete ildi rHyr Hy Hy gP ng P brid r id laza za Bus Ped Pe estr tr iani Cros ros oso sinsingssi g DRAFT 25 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS DRAFT 26 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS T Scho SchSc Traffi axi Sta ffi ol Z c Ca C Z nd oneo lmin min g El El emen me ts Security schools. DaySchool andpedestriansafety classesin elementary of pedestrianbarriers, and programs suchas Walk to include street redesigns, infrastructure, bicycle removal to school. Capital andbiking needs children walking school zones to enablesafe routes direct oftravel for The Program School focuses onimprovements within School of pedestrians, and transit users. bicyclists Capital slowing cartraffic andincreasing thesafety andvisibility systemsafety for by allusersof the transportation The goalofthe Traffic Calming Program isto improve Traffic Calming of taxiuse, vehicles. suchaspromoting electric includes initiatives to reduce theenvironmental impact stops, racks for and bicycle taxis. The Taxi Program also increasing thenumberoftaxistands, taxidriver rest enhance customer experience. Capital elementsinclude The Taxi Program seeksto improve taxi operationand Taxi system security. intransportation and bestpractices focused othersecurity exercises,Assessments (TVA), AdministrationSecurity Threat and Vulnerability needs are primarilyidentifiedthrough Transportation systems.enhanced security ProgramThe Security capital equipment andtraining, site hardening, facility and anddisastercomprised response ofemergency system. of thetransportation initiativesThese security ProgramThe Security seeksto improve thesecurity service along corridors with anticipated ridership service streets, oncity right-of-way and expansion oftransit heavily usedlines to give buses andtrainspreferred changeson the most implementing transitpriority reliability, and connectivity. capacity This includes forseeks to optimize greater andexpand Muni service The Transit OptimizationandExpansionProgram Transit Optimization&Expansion overhead wires. track replacement; andmaintainingMuni’s 217miles of including: investing innewtraincontrol technology; from railgrinding to systemwide improvements, cable car)andtrolley buses. These investments span movement of rail vehicles (lightrail, streetcars and the that supports primarily oftheinfrastructure The Transit Fixed Guideway Program iscomprised Transit Fixed Guideway workstations. andremote Transportation Center Management (TMC) variable messagesigns, acommunications network, traffic signalcontrollers, trafficcameras, video detection, maintenance procedures. ITS tools includeadvanced analysis, provide transitsignal priority, andexpedite Transportation Systems (ITS) tools to enhance traffic Francisco roadways. Capital needsinclude Intelligent travel timeandimprove andsafety ofSan mobility The Traffic Signals Program seeksto decrease transit Traffic Signals &Signs and landscapingalonglocal, and schoolstreets. arterial, pedestrian medianislands, traffic circles, laneshifting lanes), narrowing travel lanes, speedhumps, signage, investments includeroad diets(i.e. removing travel HHaig Cent N Ju enent nt u t dah d ht S ral SubwSub tree at D ubw w t uboc ay T ay y T oc c ununn ePare ne a k lBl Bo ring i Mac hine ine ne DRAFT 27 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS DRAFT 28 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS within aspecific Capital Program. measure of therelative ofeachcapital need importance outcome ofthepriorirization process is aquantitative canseeanddiscuss results inreal-time.participants The process inwhichall in atransparent and participatory provides quantitative analysis ofqualitative measures process andcollaborativestructured decisionmaking will deliver thehighest returns to SFMTA. Using a help prioritize, analyze, andmeasure which investments employed DecisionLens, tool, software aweb-based to wide criteria. Dueto thisuniquechallenge, SFMTA has which provides agency- auniquechallengeincrafting modal responsibility andthebreadth ofcapitalneeds, rating scaledefinitions. SFMTA isuniqueinitsmulti- the SFMTA Executive Team. AppendixAfor See detailed program usingthecriteria andratingscalesestablished by rated eachcapitalneedwithintheir respective experts For eachCapital Program, asmallgroup matter ofsubject for alltrips. the useofsustainablemodes operations, and support infrastructure and that helpoptimize transportation of policies, programs, information, andtools services, growth. The SFMTA isalsoimplementingacombination PRIORITIZATION OF CAPITAL NEEDS Scho ch ol Zo Z one n J ChJCh ChC h urchuurc rc h ono San SaS JoseJ oseos Ave Av ve e DRAFT 29 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS DRAFT CHAPTER CAPITAL3: PLAN INVESTMENT

30 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY SRTP2030 SFMTA FY2015 the 2013Capital Plan. This changeisprimarily driven by Capital Planare over $5.6billiongreater thanthetotal in The $21.4 billionincapitalneedsidentified this network. to thecurrent transportation needs), whileothers are enhancements and expansions of theagency’s existingassets(State of GoodRepair is neededfor theongoingreplacement andrenewal investments. thistotal, approximately Of $11.45billion capital needs, whichincludesallpotential SFMTA capital 2. Overall, theCapital Planidentifies over $21billionin capital needsofeachCapital Program are shown in Table each capitalneedwithintheCapital Program. The total organized by Capital Program andtherelative rankof needs includedinAppendixC. The capitalneeds are the prioritized listof financiallyunconstrained capital The result ofthisCapital Plandevelopment process is PRIORITIZATION FINDINGS CAPITAL PLAN INVESTMENT needs. The mostsignificant changesinclude: refined cost estimates andupdated state ofgood repair • thefullstate ofgoodrepairIncluding needsfor • thefullstate ofgoodrepairIncluding needsadded • thefullstate ofgoodrepairIncluding needsand • The additionof19thAvenue/Oceanview Subway, needs by $495million. the SFMTA’s facilitiesincreased Parking 38parking $652 millionin Transit Fixed Guideway needs. billion inFacility needs. Real Estate Vision added$1.0 for the21stCentury refinement includedinthe oftheprojects further and Expansionneedsby nearly$4.5billion. Strategy,Capacity increased Transit Optimization T Third Phase3to Fisherman’s andtheRail Wharf DRAFT 31 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 3: CAPITAL PLAN INVESTMENT DRAFT 32 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 3: CAPITAL PLAN INVESTMENT Table 2.Capital Needsby Capital Program capital needsfor inclusionintheCIP. to refine theworkcommittees necessary orperform The CIPProgram are Managers taskedto convene a CIPProgram by Manager theSFMTA DivisionDirectors. Program (CIP). Each Capital Program hasbeenassigned allocate fundingto intheCapital projects Improvement The SFMTA usesthislistofprioritiesto organize and Total Transit Optimization &Expansion Transit Fixed Guideway Traffic Signals &Signs Traffic Calming Taxi Security School Pedestrian Parking Fleet Facility Technology Infrastructure Communications & Information Bicycle Accessibility CAPITAL PROGRAM TOTAL CAPITAL NEED (millions) $21,419 $8,002 $2,646 $4,332 $2,759 $771 $194 $150 $363 $963 $167 $604 $319 $90 $57 is identifiedasoneofthesethreetypes ofinvestments: to growth. Eachcapital needincludedintheCapital Plan expansions are neededto meetprojected demanddue and expansion,buttargeted enhancements and generally higherprioritiesthansystem enhancements view capitalneeds. Restoration ofexistingassetsare ofinvestmentThe type provides anotherway to Class IIbikelaneto acycletrack). the features ofan existingasset(e.g. transforming a include investments thatupgrade systems or enhance delivery.system reliability andservice This would transit ormulti-modal system, thereby improving enhancements oftheexisting toIncludes thequality on afacility). theusefullife.asset thatextend (e.g. Replacingtheroof the useofasset,suchasmajorimprovements to an that rehabilitate orrenovate existingassetsto continue (e.g. signal alsofeatures replacement). It investments beyond theirusefullife ornormalreplacement cycle. investmentsIncludes to replace existingassetsthatare RESTORE ENHANCE CAPITAL NEEDS BY TYPES INVESTMENT Table 3.Capital Needsby Investment Type islargest. and/or whichaspect are purposeoftheinvestment categorized by the primary include any needed maintenance investments, so needs enhancement andexpansioninvestments willgenerally include thelatest technology orfeatures available, and to note that maintenance investments generally agency’s State isimportant ofGoodRepairprogram. It to maintain the existingsystem, whichcomprises the Nearly halfoftheidentifiedcapitalneeds are needed basedontotal costtype in estimate isdepicted Table 3. The relative distributionofcapitalneedsby investment category). andsystems alsofallinto this existing transitservices network mileage.bicycle Planningstudiesto expand to anewarea orincreasing transitservice the extending ridership, delivery. system reliability andservice (e.g. of theexistingsystem. includegrowing Results typically investmentsIncludes thataugment andincrease capacity EXPAND NETETPER Expand Enhance Restore INVESTMENT 32% 20% 48% CENT OF TOTAL MarkM et Se treetre e t - Tran TTra a ssit t OOnlyOn LanLaL e (R R ed) ede d andan nnd d BiBikeBikB i ke Lan e ((G (G( G reenreree een en n ) DRAFT 33 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 3: CAPITAL PLAN INVESTMENT DRAFT CHAPTER NEXT4: STEPS FOR CAPITAL PLANNING

34 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY SRTP2030 SFMTA FY2015 number of factors: number offactors: implementation through inclusionintheCIP basedona from the Capital Planshouldadvance for fundingand responsible for recommending which capitalneeds The Transportation Capital is Committee (TCC) Project Development Process. provides ofthe Capital Plan’s anoverview role inthe in the5-year CIP and 2-year Capital Budget.Figure 6 prioritizing theagency’s capital needsfor inclusion approval. The Capital Planprovides thebasisfor funded canmove review forward and for further andphasesthatareand onlyprojects substantially 2-year Capital Budget mustbefinancially constrained capital needstheSFMTA could invest in,the CIP and Whereas theCapital Planincludes all ofthepotential constrained Capital Improvement Program (CIP). the Capital Plan to beeligible for inclusioninthefiscally capital fundingmustbeincludedin seeking All projects TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL COMMITTEE CAPITAL PLANNING PROCESS PLANNING CAPITAL NEXT STEPS FOR CAPITALNEXT PLANNING factors: factors: for advancement dueseveral potentialopportunity orfundingproposalswith otherprojects provides the Funding –Coordination Alignment andOpportunities toproject proceed. orisitneededfordoes ithave another publicsupport, environmental underState and/orFederal impacts law, Project beenreviewed Readiness–Hastheproject for a Capital Program asestablishedby theCapital Plan. Project Priority – The within relative ofaproject ranking • project managementand oversight project cost savings. • cost savings through economies ofscale;and • • transit optimization oruseofbussubstitutions • enhancing multi-modaltraffic, and connections, • proximity to to otherprojects avoid multiple during construction; during construction; oflife;quality disruptionsin the samelocation; construction DRAFT 35 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 4: NEXT STEPS FOR CAPITAL PLANNING DRAFT 36 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 4: NEXT STEPS FOR CAPITAL PLANNING Budget. concurrent withtheSFMTA Operating for approval onatwo year cycle, ispresentedIt to theSFMTA Board implementationstaff.capital project capital grants and theavailability of timing ofbudgetallocations, individual refines the5-year CIP accountto for the The 2-year Capital Budgetfurther constitute the2-year Capital Budget. twoThe first years oftheCIPgenerally occur withinagiven timeframe. to implementation andconstruction or somegrants require project are neededto meetlegalrequirements Special Conditions projects –Some GrGreGree n binb b ke lk ane e nD on D ubocubo o e SteSt reet eet e t scope whileweighing budget andtimelineimplications. staffs is identified, then consider modifyingtheor conflict agency project acrossand identifies integration allmodes. an opportunity If opportunities Programs. The committee reviews atanearlyplanning phase eachproject relies representing onan internal committee oftechnical all14CIP experts on existingplans, policiesandprojects. The Project Integration Process The goalisto based identifypotential integration project opportunities are considered development.transportation at theearlystagesofproject and implementation of Complete Streets where projects allmodes of Process to facilitate SFMTA’s internal coordination delivery onproject 2014,theSFMTAIn implemented aninternal Project Integration PROJECT INTEGRATION PROCESS FIGURE 6. CAPITAL OF ROLE INPROJECT PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS FIGURE 7. CAPITAL ATYPICAL OF OVERVIEW PROJECT LIFECYCLE project ideato project implementationthrough five primary SFMTA large-scale Most move capitalprojects from a overseenwide rangeofprojects by theSFMTA. major milestones holdtruefor ofthe avastmajority mayprojects slightlydeviate from thislifecycle, the lifecycle. capitalproject the typical Althoughindividual lifecycle.capital project Figure 7provides of anoverview development. There are many additionalsteps inthe milestones inproject Capital Budgetare important The Capital Plan,Capital Improvement Program, and LIFECYCLE CAPITAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Directors, and insomecases, theBoard ofSupervisors. that theSFMTA would seekapproval from itsBoard of and engaging isduringthisstage inpublic hearings. It are accepting typically feedback onconceptual designs Environmental ReviewandDesign phases, whenprojects developmentproject process, duringthe particularly Public involvement isahallmarkoftheSFMTA’s intensive take2-3years. typically projects 6-10 years ormore to complete. Smaller, lesscapital suchasaBusRapid projects Transit cantake project orProcurement.Construction Large, capitalintensive Engineering, Environmental Review, Design and Planning,phases –Pre-development Conceptual GreeG e nBin Bi BBi eL ke Lk e L aneana ne DRAFT 37 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN CHAPTER 4: NEXT STEPS FOR CAPITAL PLANNING DRAFT APPENDIX

38 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY SRTP2030 SFMTA FY2015 Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptionsby Program Appendix B. Capital Program Capital NeedPriorities by Program Appendix A.Capital PlanPrioritization Scales Criteria andRating APPENDIX MuniMMi u i

MetroMetM oE ro oE

EastE ast t

(MME) (MME(M( M MEM )L)Li

Light ght hth -Capital Needs Table withneeddescioptions, Justifications, Types, ScoreCosts and Priority -Prioritized listoffinanciallyunconstrained capitalneeds by program -DetaileddescriptionsoftheSFMTA capitalneedevaluationcriteria andtheratingscales t

Rail RRilRail RaRai

Division DivDi iiv iiiisio n DRAFT 39 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 40 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Plan establishesthegoals, willbemeasured objectives, from andmetricsby which theagency Fiscal Year 2013through FY (FY) The Executive Team plans, goals, establishedthecriteria basedonagency and adopted policies, specificallytheStrategic Plan. Capital PlanPrioritization Scales Criteria andRating 2. Safety 1. Security Goal 1:Create experience for asafer everyone. transportation oeaeUeu .5The maintains current project safety conditions. to The reduce isexpected project incidentsand injuries. 0.25 Definition The improves directly project andmitigates documented unsafe 0.50 Weight or Unknown Minor/Neutral, Negative, 1.00 Moderate/Useful Medium/Important Major/Critical The prevents project securit Rating address andminimize safety risks. 0.25 theCity’sReduces incidentsand injuries. Supports Vision Zero that goal. Provides policy services transportation or Unknown The contributes project to improving current conditions and security Minor/Neutral, Negative, Definition The improves directly project riskrelated adocumented security to the 0.50 Moderate/Useful Weight 1.00 Medium/Important Major/Critical Rating sealevel rise,(earthquakes, oradaptationto climate change). orseverity) dueto threats, collisions, (frequency vulnerability security vandalism,theft, ornaturalcauses systemProtects assets from andAgency potential thetransportation threats. Reduces system andasset 0.00 The project is not expected to The improve isnotexpected project current conditions anditsimpacts 0.00 to The improve isnotexpected project current conditions anditsimpacts 0.00 to make amoderate difference to overall conditions. on theAgency’s safety goalsare not generally measurable. service/”safety-critical” asset. condition for employees improves orthepublic;project orrestores a on theAgency’s goalsare security notgenerally measurable. exposures may increase. reducing risksrelated to thephysical current plant;withouttheproject, risk possible. oradaptationtobasis. climate Greater changeis to earthquakes resiliency physical plantorsystems usedby thepublicoremployees onadaily Appendix A.Capital PlanPrioritization Scales Criteria andRating y conditions from deteriorating andisexpected 2018. The Strategic The DRAFT

Goal 2: Make transit, walking, bicycling, taxi, and carpooling the preferred means of travel.

1. Reliability Meets core operational Agency performance objectives. Improves transit on-time performance, reduces travel APPENDIX time variability, or improves multi-modal trip predictability. Provides a system that can be reliably used by all. Provides for the proper functioning of transportation assets. Rating Weight Definition Major/Critical 1.00 The project directly improves on-time performance, reduces travel time variability, or improves multi-modal trip predictability across or within a defined major corridor or major travel market; the project is based on documented forecasts or estimates of system performance. Medium/Important 0.50 Within high use segments of a corridor or a specific travel market, the project improves on-time performance, reduces travel time variability, or improves multi-modal trip predictability. Moderate/Useful 0.25 The project contributes to moderate improvements in OTP, travel time variability, or predictability, possibly as a limited component of a project. Minor/Neutral, Negative, 0.00 The project is not expected to improve current conditions and its impacts or Unknown on the Agency’s core operational performance standards are not generally measurable. 2. System Qaulity Improves the quality (comfort, attractiveness and cleanliness) of the transportation system. Supports the development of a seamless, multi-modal transportation system. Enhances multi-modal transfers, improves information and transfer arrangements. Provides or enhances pedestrian-oriented public spaces. 41 Rating Weight Definition Major/Critical 1.00 The project will result in a discernible, major improvement in the quality of customer-experienced use of the transportation system or related public amenities, e.g., comfort, attractiveness and cleanliness. Medium/Important 0.50 The project will make improvements to the customer-experience of the transportation system or related public amenities, e.g., comfort, attractiveness and cleanliness. Moderate/Useful 0.25 The project will maintain and continue the current customer-experience of the public transportation systems or related public amenities. It may include quality enhancements that are a limited component of overall transportation improvement projects. Minor/Neutral, Negative, 0.00 The project will not impact the Agency’s quality goals. or Unknown SFMTA FY 2015 - FY CAPITAL2034 SFMTA FY PLAN2015 DRAFT 42 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX 4. Travel Time 3. System Access bicycling, transit,walking, taxi,andcarpooling thepreferredGoal 2:Make meansoftravel. oeaeUeu .5The willmake amoderate project improvement inbarrier-free access to the 0.25 or Unknown barrier-free access The improvements makesimportant project to the Minor/Neutral, Negative, Definition The makesmajorbarrier-free project access improvements for alarge 0.50 Weight 1.00 Moderate/Useful Medium/Important Major/Critical Rating conditions are substandard. This may includeimproving wayfinding andinterconnectivity. including access for personswithdisabilities, where itdoesnot existorimproving access where existing Enhances system access andaccessibility by incorporating principlesofuniversal design. Provides access, oeaeUeu .5The willhelp reduce project delays/improve for connections transit, 0.25 or Unknown Minor/Neutral, Negative, The would project reduce travel time/improve for adistinct connectivity Definition The reduces project travel timeanddelays for amajortravel market. The 0.50 Moderate/Useful Weight 1.00 Medium/Important Major/Critical Rating rights ofway orservice. of delay through resolving agapinrightsofway, improving connectivity, orexpandingexisting physical service Reduces travel timefor transit,pedestrians, orcarpooling, bicyclists includingtaxis. Removes orlimitssources 0.00 The project is not expected to The improve isnotexpected project current conditions and its impacts 0.00 0.00 The project is not expected to The improve isnotexpected project current conditions anditsimpacts 0.00 on theAgency’s access/accessibility goalsare notgenerally measurable. for allcustomers, possiblyasalimited component ofaproject. system fortransportation peoplewithdisabilities, whileimproving access system fortransportation all customers. people withdisabilities, while improving access for allcustomers. systemcustomer for baseorathigh-usesegments ofthetransportation on theAgency’s travel timegoalsare notgenerally measurable. limited component ofaproject. pedestrians, orcarpoolingover bicyclists current conditions, possiblyasa current conditions for orcarpooling. transit,pedestrian,bicyclist travel marketorcorridor. Time savings could beclose to or>2%over orcarpooling). transit, pedestrian,bicyclist ridership. Possible timesavings could be>4%over current conditions (for improvements to maintainorincrease appear to beareal opportunity Impacts Environmental and Conservation 2. Resource Sustainability and Financial 1. Efficiency Goal 3:Improve theenvironment oflife andquality inSanFrancisco. oeaeUeu .5The maintainscurrent project O&Mcosts whileresulting inequalor 0.25 or Unknown The could project helpto avoid O&Mcosts increases; ormay create an Minor/Neutral, Negative, 0.50 Moderate/Useful Definition The reduces project O&Mcosts, avoids newcost, orprovides opportunity Weight Medium/Important 1.00 Major/Critical Rating generates additionalrevenue orprovides operatingsubsidyfor adirect theAgency. cost increases. to oftheAgency deliver Enhances theability capitalimprovements inatimelymanner. Directly operating and/ormaintenance costs for to theAgency onSFMTA’sResults inapositive impact operating results budget.Directly inanetdecrease in transportation aigWih Definition The improves project the useofrenewable resources, improves energy Weight 1.00 Major/Critical Rating address andminimize safety risks. theCity’sReduces incidentsandinjuries. Supports Vision Zero that goal. Provides policy services transportation 0.00 The project is not expected to The improve isnotexpected project current conditions and its impacts 0.00 on theAgency’s financialgoalsare notgenerally measurable. maintainingcurrent revenue.enhanced conditions; itsupports revenueservice, orotherpositive results withlesscost. for newrevenue.opportunity The could project ensure current orimproved long term. Division; somebenefitssuchasaddedefficiencies couldbeongoingand uniquefundinggrants)(i.e. withinagiven attract work area oreven a make asubstantialdifference annual to costs, operating ratios, or revenue for newrevenue from existingor newsources. The haspotential project to water ornoisepollution. would clearlybenefit from the project reducing glare, vibration, waste, air, impacts. measurable inconstruction reductions The publicoremployees reduce ofoperations onamajorcorridor orarea theimpact ormake development. transit-oriented supporting The would project substantially several years. inthenext best practices This could include projects prototype for future orsupport sustainableinfrastructure projects “green” level. The improvements from could thisoneproject beanexampleor or reducesefficiency greenhouse gas emissionsata system wideor area operate the transportation system. Avoidsoperate thetransportation potential DRAFT 43 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 44 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Impacts Environmental and Conservation 2.Resource Goal 3:Improve theenvironment oflife andquality inSanFrancisco. Moderate/Useful 0.25 The project supports useofsustainableresources/ The supports energy project efficiency, or Unknown 0.25 Minor/Neutral, Negative, Definition Weight useofsustainableresources, The supports project increased energy Moderate/Useful 0.50 Medium/Important Rating address andminimize safety risks. theCity’sReduces incidentsandinjuries. Supports Vision Zero that goal. Provides policy services transportation 0.00 The project is not expected to The improve isnotexpected project current conditions and its impacts 0.00 Agency’s environmental goalsare notgenerally impact measurable. to improve isnotexpected project current onthe conditions anditsimpacts on theAgency’s goalsare notgenerally measurable. conservation The include glare, vibration, waste, air, water andnoisepollution. marginally andoperationsthatmay reduce duringconstruction impacts possibly asalimited component ofaproject. toThe isexpected project level. atanoticeableat aspecificlocationand/or of construction reduce impacts component ofaproject. The would project reduce ofoperations theimpact efficiency, of or reduction greenhouse gasemissionsasasignificant Risk Management Risk Compliance and 2. Regulatory Communications 1. Transparent Goal 4:Create thatdelivers aworkplace outstandingservice. oeaeUeu .5The contributes project to improvements incommunications atthesub- 0.25 or Unknown Minor/Neutral, Negative, The improves project ofcommunications thetransparency withinadivision Definition The improves directly project ofcommunications, thetransparency both 0.50 Weight Moderate/Useful 1.00 Medium/Important Major/Critical Rating Provides assets. for oftransportation theproper functioning time variability, orimproves multi-modaltrippredictability. Provides asystem thatcanbereliably usedby all. objectives. core ImprovesMeets performance operationalAgency transiton-timeperformance, reduces travel Moderate/Useful 0.25 The project is expected to The qualitatively isexpected project improve to ability the Agency's 0.25 or Unknown The improves project compliance regulatory and/or riskmanagementina Definition The andmeasurably directly improves project theAgency’s to meet ability Minor/Neutral, Negative, Weight 0.50 1.00 Moderate/Useful Medium/Important Major/Critical Rating information andtransfer arrangements. Provides publicspaces. orenhances pedestrian-oriented development system. ofaseamless, Enhances multi-modaltransfers, multi-modaltransportation improves the system. Supports andcleanliness)ofthetransportation Improves attractiveness (comfort, the quality 0.00 The project is not expected to The improve isnotexpected project current conditions and its impacts 0.00 0.00 The project is not expected to The improve is notexpected project thelevel compliance ofregulatory 0.00 on the Agency's communications goalsareon theAgency's notgenerally measureable. communications. level oronexternal division level, attheagency andlikelyhasnoimpact audience.external oftheAgency, ofthe or othersection andaportion orbetween theAgency Agency. internally andexternally, resulting in increased accountability across the or provide any faces. mitigationormanagement ofriskstheAgency level. or sub-division compliancemeet regulatory requirements orto manageriskatthedivision quantitative manner inaspecificdivisionorarea ofthe Agency. complianceregulatory and/oreffectively managerisksacross theagency. DRAFT 45 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 46 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Quality 3. Workplace Goal 4:Create thatdelivers aworkplace outstandingservice. oeaeUeu .5The contributes project atitscurrent to quality maintainingworkplace 0.25 or Unknown Minor/Neutral, Negative, The includescomponents project thatimprove ofworkplace, thequality Definition isto purposeofthe project improve directly The of primary thequality Moderate/Useful 0.50 Weight 1.00 Medium/Important Major/Critical Rating conditions are substandard. This may includeimproving wayfinding andinterconnectivity. including access for personswithdisabilities, where itdoesnot existorimproving access where existing Enhances system access andaccessibility by incorporating principlesofuniversal design. Provides access, 0.00 The project is not expected to The improve isnotexpected project current conditions and its impacts 0.00 on the Agency's workplace quality are quality workplace notgenerally measureable.on theAgency's condition. SFMTA facilities. may result inahealthierwork environment for SFMTA staff and visitors to oftheproject Onlyportions purposeoftheproject. but isnottheprimary work environment for SFMTA staffandvisitors to SFMTA facilities. workplace, bothinternally andexternally, resulting inasafer andhealthier Accessbility Program Priorities Accessible Station Accessible Boarding Islands Escalators And Stops (Program) Accessible Light Accessible Accessible Stop Accessible And Features And Improvement Transit Stop Augmentation At SanJose& At SF Paratransit Elevators Operations & (Program) Maintenance Wayside Lift Wayside Accessible Program (Program) Elevator Geneva Facility Spot Rail 204060801000 Appendix B. Capital Program Capital Need DRAFT 47 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 48 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Bicycle ProgramBicycle Priorities Citywide Bicycle Strategy - BicycleStrategy Citywide - BicycleStrategy Citywide - BicycleStrategy Citywide Bicycle Sharing (Program) Sharing Bicycle Bicycle Parking (Program) Parking Bicycle Maintain Bicycle Network Bicycle Maintain Bicycle Safety Education Safety Bicycle Enhanced System Enhanced Full Build Out Build Full Base System (Program) (Program) 204060801000 Communication /Information Technology Program Priorities (IT) SFMTA Disaster Recovery Site Recovery Disaster SFMTA Communications/Information Replacement and Upgrades and Replacement Technology Infrastructure Technology Wi-Fi Across Entire Agency Entire Across Wi-Fi On Board Clipper Reader Clipper Board On Maintain Existing Maintain VoIp Implementation VoIp 204060801000 DRAFT 49 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 50 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Facility Program Priorities Implement Fall Protection Improvements at Multiple Facilities Multiple at Improvements Protection Fall Implement Security, Investigations and Enforcement Group Consolidation Group Consolidation andEnforcement Investigations Security, Implement Fire Safety Improvements at Multiple Facilities at Multiple Improvements Safety Fire Implement Operations, Maintenance, Administration and Maintenance, Operations, Real Estate Property Acquisition (Program) Real Estate Vision For The 21St Century - Century 21St The For Vision Estate Real Subway Station Rehabilitation (Program) Maintain Operator Convenience Stations Convenience Operator Maintain Maintain Existing Facility Infrastructure Facility Existing Maintain Muni Metro Station WayfindingProject Shop Equipment (Program) Equipment Shop Woods Division Facility Renovations Facility Division Woods (Non-Real Estate Vision Projects) Install New Operator Convenience Operator New Install Stations Improvements (Program) Improvements Stations RealEstateVision For The 21St Century -Real Estate Property Acquisition (Program) Metro MuniEast -Upgrade Existing Shops tobecome a FullyRail Functional Facility Facility Safety Improvements Safety Facility RealEstateVision For The 21St Century -Transit Oriented Development (Program) Rebuild Kirkland Division Kirkland Rebuild Rebuild Presidio Division Presidio Rebuild Maintain Cable Car Barn Rebuild Potrero Division Operations, Maintenance,Operations,Administration Shop and Equipment (Program) Maintain Existing Facility Infrastructure (Non-Real Estate Vision Projects) Vision Estate (Non-Real Infrastructure Facility Existing Maintain Metro MuniEast -Build Paint and Body Shopfor the Entire Muni Fleet ElectronicSystem Signage L.E.D. -Expansion ToNextMuni (Program) Install Operator New Convenience Stations Improvements (Program) Implement Fall Protection Improvements at Multiple Facilities Multiple at Improvements Protection Fall Implement Implement Fire Safety Improvements at Multiple Facilities atMultiple Improvements Safety Fire Implement 204060801000 - Acquisition of Real Rstate and Uutfit of New Facility of New andUutfit Rstate ofReal - Acquisition Rubber Tire Division Wash Rack Replacement Rack Wash Division Tire Rubber Cable Car Barn Facility Safety Improvements Safety Facility Barn Car Cable Muni Metro East -Historic Streetcar Canopy Reconfigurationas ofFlynn "pivot"facility Subway Station Rehabilitation (Program) Transit Operations Facilities Solar Panels Solar Facilities Operations Transit Maintain Operator Convenience Stations Convenience Operator Maintain Muni Metro Station WayfindingProject Woods Division Facility Renovations Facility Division Woods Interim PaintInterim Booth Implementation Cable CarCable Museum Renovation Burke Facility Reconfiguration Facility Burke Facility Safety Improvements Safety Facility Marin Site - New Use Project Use New - Site Marin Rebuild Kirkland Division Kirkland Rebuild Rebuild Presidio Division Presidio Rebuild Maintain Cable Car Barn Rebuild Potrero Division Beach Track Rebuild 204060801000 Score Security,Investigations and Enforcement Group Consolidation - Facility Program Priorities (contined) Acquisition of Real Rstate and Uutfit of New Facility ofNew and Uutfit Rstate of Real Acquisition Shops to become a Fully Functional Rail Facility Rail Functional Fully a tobecome Shops Rubber Tire Division Wash Rack Replacement Rack Wash Division Tire Rubber Cable Car Barn Facility Safety Improvements Safety Facility Barn Car Cable Muni Metro East -Historic Streetcar Canopy Reconfigurationas ofFlynn "pivot"facility Metro MuniEast -Upgrade Existing Transit Operations Facilities Solar Panels Solar Facilities Operations Transit Transit Oriented Development (Program) - Century 21St The For Vision Estate Real Metro MuniEast -Build Paint and Body Interim PaintInterim Booth Implementation Expansion ToNextMuni (Program) Shopfor the EntireMuni Fleet Electronic L.E.D. Signage System - System Signage L.E.D. Electronic Cable CarCable Museum Renovation Burke Facility Reconfiguration Facility Burke Marin Site - New Use Project Use New - Site Marin Beach Track Rebuild 020406080100 DRAFT 51 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 52 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX as part of the aspartSiemens LRVContract) Fleet Program Priorities (LRV simulatior to to be delivered (LRV simulatior Bus Operator Training Simulators Bus Operator Training Cable Car Vehicle Rehabilitation Rail Training Simulator Training Rail Motor Coach Midlife Overhaul Midlife Coach Motor Historic Vehicle Rehabilitation Vehicle Historic Paratransit Fleet Replacement Trolley Coach Coach Trolley Motor Coach Replacement Coach Motor Vehicle Mid-Life Light RailVehicle Motor Coach Expansion Coach Motor Maintain On-board Fare On-board Maintain Expansion (45Vehicles) Expansion Replacement (Program) Replacement Replacement (Program) Replacement Overhauls (Program) Overhauls Light Rail Vehicle Fleet Light RailVehicle Collection Equipment Collection Non-Revenue Vehicle Trolley Coach Midlife Coach Trolley Overhaul (Program) Overhaul Light Rail Vehicle Rail Light (Program) (Program) (Program) (Program) (Program) (Program) Replacement 204060801000 Parking Program Priorities Implement Parking Vehicle Maintain Parking Facilities Parking Maintain Parking Facility Structural Facility Parking Parking Access Revenue Electric Vehicle Charging Detection Technology Detection Maintain Parking Meters Parking Maintain And Seismic Upgrades Control System Control Infrastructure Citywide 204060801000 DRAFT 53 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 54 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Strategy Core Projects Build-Out Full Strategy Pedestiran Program Priorities Citywide Pedestrian Citywide Pedestrian and Pilots 204060801000 School ProgramSchool Priorities School Streets (Program) Traffic Calming 204060801000 DRAFT 55 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 56 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Security ProgramSecurity Priorities Technology In Transportation In Technology Surveillance, AccessControl, Surveillance, Mitigation, Preparedness, & Preparedness, Mitigation, Emergency Management Emergency All-Hazard Emergency All-Hazard and Security System Security and Planning and Response Planning and Incident Management Enhancements Response 204060801000 Taxi Program Priorities Taxi Management Driver Rest Stops Rest Driver Implement Taxi Implement Rebate Program Rebate Rebate Program Rebate Accessible Taxi Accessible Taxi Clean Fuel Clean Taxi Improvement Taxi Toplight Taxi Bicycle Racks System Pooling Pilot Pooling For Taxis Taxi Cab Taxi 204060801000 DRAFT 57 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 58 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Traffic Calming ProgramPriorities and Commercial Streets Traffic Calming - Arterial Traffic Calming -Local Calming Traffic Streets 204060801000 Traffic Signals &Signs ProgramPriorities Maintain Existing Signal Existing Maintain and Sign and Sign Infrastructure Management Assets Management Traffic Enforcement Traffic Automated Photo Automated Maintain Traffic Maintain SFGO (Program) Signs (Program) Signs New Signals & 204060801000 DRAFT 59 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 60 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Transit Fixed Guideway Program Priorities Rehabilitation (Program) Rehabilitation Automatic TrainControl Automatic Traction Power System Cable Car Infrastructure System State ofGood System State of State of Good Repair Subway Fire Alarm & Repair (Program) Rail State ofGood Repair (Program) Tunnels Structure Maintain Subway (Program) Detection 204060801000 Transit Optimization &ExpansionProgram Priorities Muni Forward Capital Projects Capital Forward Muni Programmatic Enhancements Programmatic and Fort Mason Extension Mason Fort and Rail Capacity Strategy: Capacity Rail Geneva Avenue Light Rail Light Avenue Geneva E-Line Northern Terminal Northern E-Line 19th Ave /MOceanview Ave 19th Geary Bus Rapid Transit Rapid Bus Geary Geneva/Harney Avenue Geneva/Harney Geary Light Rail Transit Rail Light Geary Arena Transit Capacity Transit Arena Rail Capacity Strategy: Capacity Rail Rail Capacity Strategy: Capacity Rail Third Street Southern Street Third Transit Extension Transit Intermodal Terminal Intermodal Bus Rapid Transit Rapid Bus Better Market Street Market Better Fisherman's Wharf Fisherman's Improvements T-Third Phase 3 to Phase T-Third Long-Term Near-Term Subway 204060801000 DRAFT 61 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 62 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Accessibility Program N5A0 Accessibility CN15-AC01 Total N5A0 Accessibility CN15-AC02 N5A0 Accessibility CN15-AC03 N5A0 Accessibility CN15-AC05 Acc CN15-AC04 N5A0 Accessibility CN15-AC06 N5A0 Accessibility CN15-AC07 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM CAPITAL essibility essibility (Program) Stops Light Rail Accessible Elevators Escalators And Station Accessible San Jose/Geneva Wayside At Lift Accessible Program Improvement Stop Spot Accessible (Program) Augmentation Elevator Muni Metro Facility Maintenance Operations & SF Paratransit (Program) And Features Boarding Islands TransitStop CAPITAL NEED NAME

INVESTMENT Ehne 68 Enhance Ehne 73 Enhance Ehne 78 Enhance 69 Enhance Ehne 35 Enhance nac 70 Enhance Epn 80 Expand TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE at Ocean (MLine). 42nd, West at14thAve, Portal MuniRight-of-way Taraval at17th/18th, Taraval at30th, Taraval at only, SanJoseAvenue atNantucketAve/San Juan, stop peryear. Locations: Church at15th,Inbound atleastone accessiblewill design andconstruct Key Stops Feasibility Study(M679.0). The project stops atthe7locationsidentified inthe Accessible 13newaccessibleDesign andconstruct lightrail Metro Elevator Augmentation Program. compliant elevators are includedintheMuni Addition (ADA) ofAmericanswithDisabilitiesAct escalators have already beenrehabilitated). includes atotal of23more escalators (five outdoor incorporate modernsafety features. Project to conform withcurrent buildingcodes and transit stationswillberehabilitated orreplaced controllers andcameras. Existingescalators in glass-paneled doors, dooroperators, hydraulics, elevators thatwillbeupgraded withnewcabs, transitstations. Projectat Muni-only includes12 Rehabilitation ofstreet andplatform elevators as part oftheBetterStreet Market project. as part Street on Market willbereplacedmechanical lifts platforms will befullyADA compliant. The four and Genevawithwayside platforms. Newwayside Replaces thewayside atSanJose mechanicallifts curb rampsadjacent to transitstops. improving crosswalks, andinstallingor upgrading of NextMuni/Push-to-Talk attransitshelters; signage andattenuators atKeyStops; installation include: repair/replacement ofdamagedrailings, persons withdisabilities. Improvements could improvements to improve accessibility for smalllightrailandbusstop Implement elevator isnotavailable. one elevator, orwhere afullyADA compliant be installedatstationsthatcurrently onlyprovide shared Stations. Muni/BART 16elevators would Metro Stationsandat elevators atMuni-Only newADAInstall compliant street andplatform a Paratransit Operations &Maintenance Facility. theplanning,Includes of design andconstruction of 50years. platforms. Eachboarding islandhas ausefullife of thelightrailsystem's 136passengerboarding Provides for thephasedrehabilitation andupgrade ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions people with mobility impairments.people withmobility foraccess to lightrailtransit,particularly This willimprove project passenger stations for personswithdisabilities. ensure consistent andsafe access to of stationelevators andescalators and The willimprove project thereliability reliability. maintenance whileimproving system platforms willreduce boarding timeand system. Providing accessible boarding aidscanaccessmobility thelightrail by ensuringthatpassengersusing platforms willimprove system access Replacement ofwayside with lifts impairments. for stops, peoplewithmobility particularly access, wayfinding, andsafety transit to This willimprove project passengers' stations. needing theelevator for access to the impairmentsandothers with mobility underground Metro stationsfor people and fullyADA compliant access to the The newelevators will ensure consistent Th cost ranges from $40M-$100M. Paratransitpermanent City-owned facility. The willprovide project afullyequipped experience. of goodrepair. Enhance thecustomer system by keepingassetsin astate Provide asafe andaccessible transit 2015 COST (rounded) $126,594,000 $319,000,000 $13,750,000 $46,577,000 $64,000,000 $65,000,000 $1,275,000 $1,500,000 Bicycle CN15-BI01 Bicycle Bicycle CN15-BI01 N5B0 Bicy CN15-BI04 Bicycle CN15-BI03 Bicycle CN15-BI02 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED

Program PROGRAM CAPITAL cle (Program) ParkingBicycle System Strategy -Base Bicycle Citywide (Program) Sharing Bicycle (Program) Education Safety Bicycle CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 71 Enhance nac 79 Enhance Epn 61 Expand Epn 62 Expand TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE on-demand bicycle parking options. parking bicycle on-demand lockersprovideSecure bicycle flexible, shared use, lockersperyear.and theinstallationof100bicycle controlled access for secure storage ofabicycle; orattended facilitiesthathaveare self-service stations, which parking installation of2-3bicycle throughout SanFrancisco. Alsoincludesthe atvariouslocations to parking facilitate bicycle wheel stops; bollards; corrals andothermeasures per year (e.g., sidewalk racks, on-street racks); racks theinstallationof1,200bicycle Includes bicycle network accessibility.bicycle spaces to reduce parking andincreasebicycle theft increasing installation of8,000 safety andcomfort, for circulationintersections bicycle andcontrol, upgrade of 20 network, miles ofexistingbicycle Plan,upgrades identified inthe2009Bicycle 20 to network funds completion oftheexistingbicycle share to 8%. This programmatically project proposes improvements thatwillincrease mode mode share. StrategyThe BaseSystem Bicycle bike network to accomplish itsgoalof20%bicycle investments to enhance andexpandtheCity’s everyday transportation. The Strategy proposed needed for to promote theCity for cycling Plan,lays2009 Bicycle outthekeyinvestments San Francisco’s Strategy, Bicycle buildingonthe years. seven replacement every 2013. Includes of bicycles increases from in theinitiallaunchof350bicycles Coverage area sharingfleet willexpandasbicycle bicyclists, andlegalresponsibilities. handling ofabicycle, rulesoftheroad, hazards for levels.for allskill Topics covered includeproper Operators, etc.). Courses for are bicyclists taught Muni oftheirjob(taxi,truck, aspart bicyclists with andmotorists whointeract both bicyclists Provides safety educationalcourses for onbicycle ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions attractive modeinSanFrancisco.attractive asafer,transportation more viable, bicycle storage needs,bicycle making theentire systemserve by providing for at theendoftheirtrips. These facilities canaccesscyclists desired landuses safe, convenient sothat parking bicycle entire system through theprovision of improvementsThese facility the serve improved. more itwillneed to be expandedand the more people thatusethesystem, the accessible for everyone. Additionally, the streets ofSanFrancisco are safe and that more popularmode, itisimportant becomes As a cycling transportation. needed to promote for cycling everyday Plan andlays outkeyinvestments Strategy buildsuponthe2009Bicycle mode.3.5% bicycle SFMTA’s Bicycle network accommodatesthe bicycle a its limited publicright-of-way. Currently, thoughtful andefficientabouttheuse of congestion willincrease is unlesstheCity grows andincreases indensity, traffic As thepopulationofSanFrancisco number ofauto trips. through inthe areduction impacts vehicles. Reduces noiseandairquality onboardneed to bringabicycle transit mile”“last solutionandeliminate the users complete theirtrip, calleda often overcrowding. Can helppublic transit in automobile tripsandtransit contributes towards areduction trips,option, primarilyfor which short asaviabletransportation bicycling sharingfacilitiesencourage Bicycle cyclists. responsibilities andnon- ofbothcyclists greater understandingoftherightsand may result ina Educating non-cyclists up to date onthemostrecent laws. to refresh orget theirknowledge andexperiencedcomfortable cyclists allows for to feel newcyclists more Providing proper trainingandeducation 2015 COST (rounded) $118,000,000 $22,800,000 $54,000,000 $12,000,000 DRAFT 63 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 64 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Bicycle ProgramBicycle Total Bicycle CN15-BI05 CN15-BI06 Bicycle Bicycle CN15-BI06 CN15-BI07 Bicycle Bicycle CN15-BI07 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM CAPITAL

System - Enhanced Strategy Bicycle Citywide Build Out Strategy -Full Bicycle Citywide (Program) Network Bicycle Maintain CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT etr 82 Restore xad81 Expand xad80 Expand TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE bicycle network. bicycle facilitiesto SanFrancisco’s10 milesofnewbicycle Area BikeShare system intheCity, andadditionof spaces, to theBay parking 1,800bicycles bicycle additionofapproximately network, bicycle 10,000 funds upgrades to anadditional20milesofthe mode share to 10%. This programmatically project System proposes improvements thatwillincrease mode share. StrategyThe Enhanced Bicycle bike network to accomplish itsgoalof20%bicycle investments to enhance andexpandtheCity’s everyday transportation. The Strategy proposes needed for to promote theCity for cycling Plan,lays2009 Bicycle outthekeyinvestments San Francisco’s Strategy, Bicycle buildingonthe shift upto 20%. shift proposes improvements thatwillincrease mode StrategyThe ExpandedFull Bicycle Build-Out for bikes,parking andaccess to shared bicycles. routes for secure andconnections bikescitywide, willleadto saferInvestments inthiscategory comparedfor to othermodes. transportation Franciscocycling thatoffers asanequalchoice Strategy isdesigned to provide asystem inSan modeshare.bicycle Full oftheBicycle Build-Out bike network to accomplish itsgoalof20% investments to enhance andexpandtheCity’s everyday transportation. The Strategy proposes needed for to promote theCity for cycling Plan,lays2009 Bicycle outthekeyinvestments San Francisco’s Strategy, Bicycle buildingonthe and corrals, counters. andbicycle signals,bicycle stripingandsignage, racks bicycle hitposts,soft green lanes, bicycle sharrows, network elementssuchas Rehabilitates bicycle ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions expanded. the more itwillneedto beimproved and the more peoplethatusethesystem, accessible for everyone. Additionally, the streets ofSanFrancisco are safe and that more popularmode, itisimportant becomes As a cycling transportation. needed to promote for cycling everyday Plan andlaysBicycle outkeyinvestments Strategy buildsuponthe2009 Bicycle modeshare.a 3.5%bicycle SFMTA’s network accommodatesthe bicycle its limited publicright-of-way. Currently, is thoughtfulandefficientaboutuseof congestion willincrease unlesstheCity grows andincreases indensity, traffic As the populationofSanFrancisco to beexpanded. that usethesystem, themore it willneed everyone. Additionally, themore people Francisco are safe andaccessible for thatthestreets ofSan it isimportant becomes amorecycling popularmode, As forcycling everyday transportation. key investmetns neededto promote Planandlaysupon the2009Bicycle out mode. SFMTA’s Strategy builds Bicycle network accommodates a3.5% bicycle way. Currently, theexistingbicycle the limited useofthe publicright-of- isthoughtfulandefficientabout City congestion willincrease unlessthe grows andincreases indensity, traffic As the populationofSanFrancisco Strategy. goals establishedintheSFMTA’s Bicycle investments contribute to meetingthe network in aState-of-Good-Repair. These andmaintainsthe encourages bicycling network Rehabilitating thebicycle 2015 COST (rounded) $108,000,000 $255,000,000 $604,000,000 $33,825,000 Communications &Information Technology Program Infrastructure CN15-IT05 CN15-IT04 CN15-IT03 CN15-IT01 Total CN15-IT02 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED IT Infrastructure IT Infrastructure Communications/ IT Infrastructure Communications/ IT Infrastructure Communications/ IT Infrastructure Communications/ IT Infrastructure IT Infrastructure Communications/ PROGRAM CAPITAL Entire Agency Wi-Fi Across Implementation VoIp Recovery Site SFMTA Disaster Upgrades Replacement and Clipper Reader 64 On Board Restore Existing Maintain CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 5 Enhance Epn 25 Expand etr 18 Restore 45 Restore TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE Management/Tracking system. Bus On-Board Video, andtheIncident Technology assets, includingSCADA, existing Communications/Information Provides for thereplacement ofvarious Infrastructure (VMI). Infrastructure (EAM) and Management Mobile Virtual initiatives likeEnterprise Assetagency computing andsupports mobile/portable toall sites leverage willallow theagency facilities. Expanding Wi-Fi to connectivity is notdistributed across theotheroffices or managed mannerat1South Van Nessand Currently Wi-Fi is onlyreadily available ina facilitiesandoffices. all oftheagency This willimplement project Wi-Fi across over 20years. thenext system andtwo subsequentreplacements provides for thereplacement ofthecurrent estimated usefullife of10years thisprogram integrate withLync andExchange. With an adding features to thephonesystem thatwill operating cost while for telephone service Protocol solution. (VoIP) This willreduce the unified Lync Based Voice overInternet utilized across thevariousfacilitiesto a PBX system(s) thatarethe legacy currently phonesystem fromMigrate theagency existing infrastructure. and isalready addressed withtheagency's AvailabilityHigh isnotcovered by thissite allsystems.then expandthesite to support phases, implementandtest keysystems, disaster. This would beapproached intwo site to provide operationsintheevent ofa Planning andimplementationofanITserver issues.performance issuesandcurrentcompatibility equipment and are fieldproven willaddress future NFC(openpayment), QR/Barcodessupport readers withunitsthatintegrate withRadio, Clipper.only support Replacingtheexisting are notableto integrate and withRadio (approx. 3500units).Currently thereaders Replacement ofthe existingClipperreaders ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions

key facilities. redundant linkswillbeimplemented for be completed to allSFMTA sites and will implementation fiber connectivity enterprise Wi-Fi ofthis As part network. efficiencies isdependent onasolid computers to improveand portable communications. Utilizationoftablets dependent technologies andimprove to leveragewill allow theagency Wi-Fi astandard Implementing Wi-Fi solution ProtocolInitiation (SIP)compatible. for desktop phones thatare Session agency. The capitalinvestment isprimarily the operational costs of Telephony inthe communications optionswhilereducing will provide additionalfeatures and ofa Implementation VoIP solution systems intheevent ofadisaster. required to enabletheoperation ofkey any capacity. ADisaster site Recovery is able to operate any ofitsITsystems in data centers inoperableitwould notbe a disaster thatrenders bothofitsprimary disaster recovery site andintheevent of The SFMTA currently does nothave a to theClippersystem.as anadjunct to leverage newerthe agency technology single sign onfor operators andenable systemwith thenewRadio providing willallowat thisjuncture for integration reliability issues. Replacingtheequipment to address itsongoingperformance current equipmentneedsto be replaced has anoperating life of5years. The equipment wasinstalledin2007and replaced by 2019,however theexisting The Clippersystem isdueto be reliable transit system. a safeof thesesystems and supports Providing for thetimelyreplacement 2015 COST (rounded) $148,494,000 $167,000,000 $3,100,000 $3,433,000 $2,807,000 $9,300,000 DRAFT 65 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 66 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Facility Program N5F0 Facility CN15-FA09 Facility CN15-FA08 Facility CN15-FA07 Facility CN15-FA06 Facility CN15-FA05 F CN15-FA04 Facility CN15-FA03 Facility CN15-FA02 Facility CN15-FA01 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM acility acility CAPITAL

(Program) Stations Convenience Operator New Install multiple facilities improvements at Safety Fire Implement multiple facilities improvements at Fall protection Implement Improvements Facility Safety (Program) To NextMuni - Expansion Signage System L.E.D.Electronic Renovation Museum Cable Car Improvements Facility Safety Cable Car Barn Reconfiguration Burke Facility Rebuild Beach Track CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 45 Enhance 43 Enhance 5 Enhance 35 Enhance 32 Enhance 27 Enhance nac 40 Enhance Epn 46 Expand 35 Expand TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE Shutoff Switches. Storeroom Isolative Wall, andPresidio Power Nets, Motive Power Lights, Emergency Potrero Abatement, Pit Drain SumpSystems, Pit Safety Projects include:Eye Wash Stations, Pigeon atallSFMTAprojects facilities, asappropriate. Features safety improvement aseriesoffacility new operator restrooms. (OCC), subway stations, etc. of andconstruction locations, includingOperations Central Control improvement of15newrestroom facilities at9 and majorrehabilitation, preservation, Includes Scott, Green and Potrero.Kirkland, fire safetyImplement improvements at Flynn, Presidio, MMEandDuboce. Scott, Green, Potrero,Kirkland, Cable Car Barn, fallprotection improvementsImplement atFlynn, system. and expansionoftheNextBus i.e.,the statusofMuniservices, amodernization andinform Muni passengersof stations to alert information signage attheentrances ofallsubway purchase andinstallationofpublic Includes Street. located attheCable Car Barnat1201Mason Renovates andimproves theCable Car Museum, area. car machinery air andexhaustventilation systems for thecable welding shop. Alsoinstallsandreplaces thefresh fireof anemergency escapehatch from the management andstaff. Includes the construction mezzanine level ofthebuildingfor maintenance officeConstructs space onthefirstfloor Burke. and move component rebuild from Woods to Reconfigure Burke to improve storage capacity, historical streetcar canopy matalsoberemoved. reconfigure and rebuild tracks for storage. The is removed andcanopy removed (ornot), Division. Once oldmaintenance building which islocated across thestreet from Green Rebuild tracks atBeach Yard (formerly Geneva), ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions healthier working environments.healthier working employee facilities, potentially leadingto This willimprove project andenhance regulations. Remain incompliance with safety regulations. Remain incompliance withsafety culture ofsafety. alsoassistinpromotinginfrastructure a work environment. Investments insafety These improve project thesafety ofthe informed transitaccess decisions. reliability, andallow passengersto make This willimprove project safety and revenue.of agency aswella keytourist asasource attraction, operational benefits, itwillhelpmaintain willnotprovideWhile thisproject environment for employees. also helpmaintainahealthy working in cablecaruse. Improvements will more andincreases reliable service result willindirectly system. insafer, It andsafety forthecablecar efficiency Improvements willenhance maintenance Burke. Woods by moving component rebuild to SFMTA, free upmaintenance space at Maximize useofbuildingowned by streetcar fleets. future projected SFMTA andhistoric LRV Storage isneededto accommodate 2015 COST (rounded) $13,000,000 $14,800,000 $16,700,000 $4,500,000 $5,400,000 $1,600,000 $4,350,000 $2,100,000 $7,000,000 Facility Program N5F1 Facility CN15-FA10 N5F1 Facility CN15-FA11 N5F1 Facility CN15-FA12 N5F1 F CN15-FA13 N5F1 Facility CN15-FA14 N5F1 Facility CN15-FA15 N5F1 Facility CN15-FA16 N5F1 Facility CN15-FA17 N5F1 Facility CN15-FA18 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM acility acility CAPITAL

Implementation Implementation Paint Booth Interim Car Barn CableMaintain Vision Projects) (Non-Real Estate Infrastructure Existing Facility Maintain Stations Convenience Operator Maintain Use Project SiteMarin -New Facility Functional Rail become aFully Existing Shopsto East -Upgrade Metro Muni Fleet the Entire Muni Body Shopfor - BuildPaint and Muni Metro East Streetcar Canopy East -Historic Muni Metro Project Wayfinding Station Muni Metro CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 43 Enhance Epn 13 Expand Epn 34 Expand Epn 39 Expand etr 20 Restore etr 39 Restore etr 49 Restore etr 47 Restore etr 17 Restore TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE in 5-7years. Paint andBodyFacility isbuiltatMuniMetro East Woods andPotrero to bridgeperioduntil new Replace obsolete andtoo small paintboothsat machines thatmakesthecablecar. of vehicles, aswell asthecableandwinding includingstorage andrunningrepairfacility Cable Car Barnfacility. ofthe functions Major Rehabilitate andreplace majorsystems ofthe Vision are listed separately. Projectselectrical). identifiedintheRealEstates andinternalstructure systems (e.g., HVAC, piping, and fixed equipment,primarilythebuilding Rehabilitate andreplace infrastructure facility new operator restrooms. (OCC), subway stations, etc. of andconstruction 6 locations, includingOperations Central Control improvement of25existingrestroom facilitiesat and majorrehabilitation, preservation, Includes the short term (through 2020) the short Use for storage ofbusesandlightmaintenance in available atGreen. arebecause somemaintenance only functions of shuttlingLRVs orhistoric streetcars to Green, Fully equipshopsatMMEto endrequirement mid-life overhaul oftransitvehicles. trolley buses. The shopwould alsoassistwith entire MunifleetofLRVs, streetcars, busesand the Build anewpaintandbodyshopto serve body shop. MME onthesite formerly to receive apaintand Build anewhistoric streetcar canopy orshelter at street, concourse andplatform levels. and West Portal, signage will bedesigned for the areas. At Van Ness, Church, Castro, Forest Hill Center, signage willbedesigned for theMuni-paid At Embarcadero, Montgomery, Powell, andCivic adhere to MTC/BART Guidelines. StationStyle concourse andplatform levels). Allsignage will signage atthe Metro Munistations(on-street, The willdesign project andinstallnewwayfinding ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions issues. small, andborderline concerning safety Existing paintboothsare obsolete, too service. will helpensure safe andreliable transit fixed equipmentinastate ofgood repair and existingcable carfacility Maintaining in astate-of-good-repair. iscriticaltoproject maintainingfacilities to provideability reliable service. This SFMTA facilitiesimproves theagency's Timely replacement andrehabilitation of healthier working environments.healthier working employee facilities, potentially leadingto This willimprove project andenhance as an annex type offacility.as anannextype to well theIslaisCreek Divisionwillserve trolley buses, andthisspace located next Muni needsspace to store busesand rail divisions. historic streetcars between theSFMTA eliminate hourslostto shuttlingLRVs and MMEfullyoperational and Make exists atMunifacilities. thatcurrently duplication ofthisfunction will result inacost savings, andend Moving paintandbodyto onelocation sheltered storage. investment, theyare better protected with As historic streetcars are along-term system users. are especially usefulfor new or infrequent station destinations. Wayfinding programs trains aswell astowards finalout-of- travel, andorienttravelers to correct experience, highlightdesired pathsof enhancetrip making, thetransit user Comprehensive wayfinding can support 2015 COST (rounded) $182,230,000 $521,746,000 $152,100,000 $23,600,000 $23,700,000 $3,300,000 $3,100,000 $1,300,000 $1,625,000 DRAFT 67 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 68 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Facility Program N5F1 Facility CN15-FA19 N5F2 Facility CN15-FA24 Facility CN15-FA23 F CN15-FA22 Facility CN15-FA21 Facility CN15-FA20 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM acility acility CAPITAL

(Program) Shop Equipment Administration Maintenance, Operations, Division Rebuild Presidio Division Rebuild Potrero Division Rebuild Kirkland (Program) Development Transit Oriented - 21St Century Vision For The Real Estate (Program) Acquisition Estate Property -Real Century The 21St Vision For Real Estate CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 68 Enhance Ehne 48 Enhance 14 Enhance 42 Enhance nac 61 Enhance Expand 50 TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE administrative functions. of SFMTA operations, maintenance and allaspects of theequipmentneededto support Provides for ongoingacquisition andreplacement is underway. to whilerebuild pivot to remain facility inservice Complete rebuild Presidio Division -fleetmoves is underway. to whilerebuild pivot to remain facility inservice Complete rebuild Presidio Division-fleetmoves is underway. to whilerebuild pivot to remain facility inservice Complete Division-fleetmoves rebuild Kirkland Program ortheFacility RehabilitationProgram. can beusedto finance theRealEstate Acquisition to developers, revenue earnedthrough the TODs Upper Yard. Bysellingorground leasingtheland sites includePresidio Potrero, South, andthe are, obsolete. insomecases, functionally These for theoperation ofthesystemnecessary andthat SFMTA owns thatare many nolonger properties proactive inplanningfor itsfuture needs. operations. This program to be allows theagency estate transit needsoftheagency, particularly to better accommodateof newproperty thereal Allows for leasingoracquisition theselective ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions functions. maintenance, andadministration operations, the equipmentthatsupport of maintaining astate-of-good-repair equipment. This iscriticalto project reduce incidents stemming from faulty to provideability and reliable service the shopequipmentincreases SFMTA's Timely replacement andenhancement of good repair. maintaining theMuni Fleet inastate of properly designed facilitiesare key to system ismore efficient.Efficientand and willensure thatthetransportation safer conditions andhealthier working The resulting improvements willprovide and isobsolete andneedsto bereplaced. isoverThe divisionfacility 100years old good repair. maintaining theMuniFleet inastate of properly designed facilitiesare keyto system ismore efficient.Efficientand and willensure thatthe transportation safer conditions andhealthierworking The resulting improvements willprovide and isobsolete and needsto bereplaced. isoverThe divisionfacility 100years old the MuniFleet inastate ofgoodrepair. designed facilitiesare key to maintaining is more efficient.Efficientand properly system ensure thatthetransportation conditionshealthier working andwill improvements willprovide safer and non-conforming interests. The resulting istoo small, andislocatedIt among and isobsolete and needsto bereplaced. isoverThe divisionfacility 60years old maintain theMunifleet. provides resources to operate and Fully utilizingexistingSFMTA properties maintenance capabilitiessooner. SFMTA vehicle capacitiesand facility RE timeline,Vision increasing ina shorter provide implementthe to theflexibility wouldA newbusoperations facility 2015 COST (rounded) $172,319,000 $71,500,000 $94,000,000 $50,700,000 $20,000,000 $80,000,000 Facility Program N5F2 Facility CN15-FA25 Total Facility CN15-FA28 Facility CN15-FA27 Facility CN15-FA26 N5F3 Facility CN15-FA30 F CN15-FA29 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM acility acility CAPITAL

"pivot" facility of Flynn as Reconfiguration (Program) Rehabilitation Subway Station Facility Uutfit ofNew Real Rstate and - Acquisition of Consolidation Group and Enforcement Investigations Security, Replacement Wash Rack Division Rubber Tire Renovations Facility Woods Division Panels Facilities Solar Operations Transit CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 27 Enhance Ehne 22 Enhance 11 Enhance Ehne 46 Enhance 8 Enhance etr 60 Restore TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE division isrebuilt. division fleetsfrom otherlocationsasthe become the"pivot divisionthatwould host division for busesandtrolley would buses. It and otherchangesto asa allow itto serve Reconfigure Flynn by adding overhead wires tile replacement. as well aspaintingandplatform edgedetection systems, systems, electrical plumbingsystems, Ventilating, andAirConditioning (HVAC) substructure, superstructure, Heating, includesrehabilitationstations. of It improvement intheMetro projects Subway Provides for ongoingrehabilitation and SFMTA. owned -orlongtermone facility leasedby (Security, Investigations andEnforcement) into Consolidate diverse work groups inSIE division inwhichtheyare installed. motor coaches dependingonthe articulated racks willbeableto handlestandard and/or for allfive Rubber Tire Transit Divisions. Wash Provides standard washracks newindustry equipment throughout thefacility. bays to accept 60'buses, upgrade existing moved to Burke, modifysomemaintenance maintenance areas component after rebuild is washer thatcanhandle60'buses, improve Replace paintbooth,replace washrackswith energy could bereturned to thepower grid. could beusedto power andexcess each facility installed. The generation resulting electrical clear roof space where solarpanelscould be hasanabundance ofopen, Each facility Potrero, Presidio and Flynn Transit Facilities. ofsolarpanelsatthe Installation Woods, ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions projected newdivision. willlikelybelocated atFlynn,It or atthe the RealEstate visionrecommendations. A pivot isneededto implement facility efficient ones. i.e., replaces oldsystems withenergy- consistent andefficientstationoperations, Timely replacement ofassetsallows for hazards dueto deteriorating systems. facilities willreduce theriskofsafety Well-maintained subway station functions. provide adequate space for SIEgroup job leaseofinferior facilities,end short-term Improved coordination ofSIEGroup, chemicals. cleaning and efficientlyutilizes necessary reduces water resource consumption effective andmodernized equipmentthat environmentworking by providing more willalso improve It the satisfaction. with thepotential ofimproving customer This willresult project incleanerbuses, 60' buses. to have facilitiesthat canaccommodate inmaintenanceperformance areas, and Upgrade Woods to achieve better renewable resources. goals by reducing SFMTA's useofnon- sustainability theagency's also support and would result incost savings. would It This willimprove project energy efficiency 2015 COST (rounded) $1,163,370,000 $2,759,000,000 $31,100,000 $10,200,000 $12,000,000 $52,000,000 $20,000,000 DRAFT 69 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 70 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Fleet Program N5F0 Fleet CN15-FL01 N5F0 Fleet CN15-FL02 N5F0 Fleet CN15-FL03 N5F0 F CN15-FL04 N5F0 Fleet CN15-FL05 N5F0 Fleet CN15-FL06 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM leet CAPITAL

(45 Vehicles) Fleet Expansion Light Rail Vehicle Simulators Training Bus Operator (Program) Rehabilitation Cable Car Vehicle (Program) Rehabilitation VehicleHistoric (Program) Overhauls Vehicle Midlife Light Rail (Program) Replacement Light Rail Vehicle CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Rsoe 98 Restore Epn 65 Expand etr 88 Restore etr 94 Restore etr 96 Restore etr 97 Restore TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE for. already funded. LRVs accounted 260 LRVs. Earlier expansionsof24and40LRVs are increase thelevel oftransitservice. To atotal of purchase 45additionallightrailvehicles to Current provides contract for theoptionto Metro Eastor2650Bayshore. Potential locationsfor thesimulators includeMuni traffic behaviors andother real-world situations. weather conditions, equipmentmalfunctions, transit operators to provide control over difficult stations. These simulators willbeusedto train 360-degree, computer-based graphic training purchase andinstallationoftwoIncludes and 2California Cars. Cars, andminorrehabilitation of10Powell Cars rehabilitation of17Powell Cars and11California of the40vehicle CableIncludes major Car fleet. Encompasses phasedoverhaul andreconstruction and fare box procurement. system, backupmaster controller, majoroverhaul, (ADA)Disabilities Act rehabilitation, brakeinterlock includesAmericans with cost of$1.2Mto $1.5M.It 15yearsrehabilitation ataunit isneededevery of-life condition). A rehabilitation (to like-new streetcar vehicles (44total), featuring anend- rehabilitation ofallcurrently inusehistoric This program consists ofthesystematic rehabilitations between 2015and2034. of today's vehicles willneedto complete and replacement schedule, 76out of the151 doors, carbody, seats, andcab. Per rehabilitation (HVAC), brakes, couplers, pantograph, propulsion, includes Heating Ventilating andAirConditioning new vehicles from future expansion. This program overhaul of175Siemens light-railvehicles and thesystematicIncludes midlife rehabilitation and years. Central Subway LRVs accounted for. the Metro lightrailsystem. 25 Replacement every needsof that meettheoperational andcapacity useful life, with151newlightrailvehicles (LRVs) light railvehicles when theyreach theendoftheir replacementIncludes oftheentire fleetofBreda ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions and comfort. should allow for greater speed, reliability fleetwithmodern vehicles the LightRail lightraillines.construction Expansionof alongexistingandunder service This willprovide project for increased operate. understanding ofthevehicles they conditions. Operators willhave abetter andunderinclementweather emergency being better prepared intimesof safety training, for thepurposesof This willprovide project for greater tourist attraction. to thistopproviding service quality system reliability, safety, andproductivity, This program willmaintainahighlevel of providing quality service to patrons.providing service quality system reliability, safety, andproductivity, This program willmaintainahighlevel of maintenance costs. the life ofthevehicles andwillreduce state ofsystem reliability throughout This rehabilitation willensure ahigher greater speed, reliability andcomfort. fleetandwill alsoallow for vehicle (LRV) modernization oftheexistinglightrail This willprovide project for the 2015 COST (rounded) $280,280,000 $127,373,000 $221,265,000 $879,235,000 $31,586,000 $1,000,000 Fleet Program N5F0 Fleet CN15-FL07 N5F1 F CN15-FL11 Fleet CN15-FL10 Fleet CN15-FL09 Fleet CN15-FL08 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM leet CAPITAL

Equipment Collection Board Fare On- Maintain (Program) Replacement Vehicle Non-Revenue (Program) Replacement Motor Coach (Program) Midlife Overhaul Motor Coach (Program) Expansion Motor Coach CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Epn 97 Expand etr 69 Restore etr 49 Restore 98 Restore 98 Restore TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE storage. a newcentral computer anddata for reporting purchases system adatacollection attheyard and a batch offare boxes isbeingrefurbished; and additional fare boxes asafloatwhen to serve refurbishes vaultequipment;procures 72 fare boxes; procures newprobing equipment; thefollowing replacesIncludes activities: 1,250 at theendoftheiruseful life. willreplaceproject existingnon-revenue vehicles sedans thatare used throughout the agency. This vehicles, trucksand aswell duty aslightandheavy revenue vehicles, suchasspecialized maintenance Consists ofthepurchase andreplacement ofnon- 12years.Replacement every and mostadvanced hybrid technology available. severely overtaxed equipmentwith thelatest fleet astateto ofgood repair, replacing old, program seeksto replace theexistingaging with hybrid motor coaches through 2034. This motor coaches (hybridand articulated anddiesel) Entails thereplacement of511existingstandard seats; glass;andbodyrepair andpaint. systems; passengeranddriver wheelchair lifts; engines; transmissions; differentials; suspension includes rehabilitation andreplacement of vehicles from future expansion. The program all 564vehicles inthemotor coach fleetandnew Provides for thesystematic mid-life overhaul of Hunters Point/Candlestick Point Shipyard). developments (Parkmerced, Treasure Island, to to provide plannedmajor expandedservice These expansionvehicles includethoseneeded as shown inthe Transit Fleet Plan. Management from 460to 581buses(increase of121buses), and 2032,themotor coach fleetwillexpand accommodate projected growth. Between 2013 number ofvehicles andvehicle capacity, to Expansion ofthemotor coach fleet,bothin ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions reductions intravelreductions time. lead to better system reliability and passenger boarding. addition,itwill In system accountability aswell as This willeffectively project improve measures. corrective incidents andperform service access locationswhere there are system andefficiently transportation theoperations ofthe effectively support vehicles ensures thatemployees can On-time replacement ofnon-revenue customer satisfaction. transit reliability, on-timeefficiency, and and security, aswell asimproved willimprovethis project safety agency flooring, andbetter mirrors. As a result, composite materials, slipresistant transmission-based brake retarders, reliability andsafety withenhanced The newcoaches willoffer greater reliability. of breakdowns andimproves service motor coach fleet reduces thenumber replaced. Timely rehabilitation ofthe its fullusefullife before needingto be program willallow eachvehicle to reach addition, this rehabilitation vandalism. In manner, reducing safety hazards and vehicles operate inasafe andsecure of themotor coach fleetensures thatthe vehicle's usefullife. Mid-life rehabilitation key components midway through the a state ofgoodrepair by replacing to maintainthemotor coach fleetin focus ofthisprogramThe primary is help meetzero emissionstargets. needs for vehicles larger capacity and procurements willhelpmeetoperational ridership demand. addition, newfleet In fleet isneeded to meetprojected The expansionofthemotor coach 2015 COST (rounded) $223,361,000 $804,528,000 $363,332,000 $180,188,000 $49,443,000 DRAFT 71 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 72 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Fleet Program Total Fleet CN15-FL12 N5F1 Fleet CN15-FL15 Fleet CN15-FL14 Fleet CN15-FL13 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM CAPITAL

(Program) Replacement Paratransit Fleet (Program) Replacement TrolleyCoach (Program) Midlife Overhaul TrolleyCoach contract. LRV of theSiemens delivered aspart simulatior to be Simulator (LRV TrainingRail CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 63 Enhance Rsoe 98 Restore 97 Restore 71 Restore TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE every 15years.every 60' vehicles, fewer 40'vehicles). Replacement ofridership (more Planprojections Management may beadjusted to align withthe Transit Fleet During replacement themixofvehicles sizes the trolley coach fleetin a state-of-good-repair. the endoftheir15-year usefullife, maintaining replacesproject thetrolley coach vehicles at the 333vehicles inthetrolley coach fleet. This Provides for thesystematic replacement of meet current standards (e.g., accessibility). overhauls involve modernizationofequipmentto components. This program ofrebuilds and management, andminoroverhaul ofmajor of frames, inverter replacement, battery includes therehabilitation andreplacement vehicles from future expansion. This program 333 vehicles inthetrolley coach fleetandnew systematicImplements mid-life overhauls ofall only. replacement offive cycle years. Revenue vehicles wheelchairs and12seated passengers, basedona oneto vans, two designedlarge-sized to carry Provides for thepurchase ofapproximately 67 Bayshore. simulator includeMuniMetro Eastand2650 learning environment. Potential sites for the railtrainingsimulators andavirtual of-the-art SFMTA's existingtraining system withstate- for five classrooms. willmodernizeThis project purchase ofAudio Visual andmultimediasetup environment. The alsoincludesthe project learning rail trainingsimulator andvirtual Purchase andinstallationofonefull-scale ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions and employee. experiencecomfortable for thecustomer greater reliability and a cleanerandmore deterioration andage, contributing to incidents andbreakdowns from vehicle vehicles reduces thenumberof Timely replacement oftrolley coach vehicle's usefullife. vehicle components midway through the a state ofgoodrepair by overhauling to maintainthetrolley coach fleetin focus ofthisprogramThe primary is transit system. who are unableto access thefixed route better access for personswithdisabilities providing for newer, modern vehicles and This willreplace project thecurrent fleet, to passrequired operational exams. rail system andwould bebetter prepared understanding oftherail vehicle andthe carry. Personnel would have abetter and safety ofthepassengersthatthey have learnedto improve thecomfort Trained operators would usewhatthey 2015 COST (rounded) $4,332,000,000 $921,600,000 $230,400,000 $18,243,000 $2,000,000 Parking Program N5P0 Parking CN15-PA01 Total N5P0 Parking CN15-PA02 N5P0 Parking CN15-PA03 N5P0 Park CN15-PA04 N5P0 Parking CN15-PA05 N5P0 Parking CN15-PA06 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM CAPITAL ing

Infrastructure Infrastructure Charging VehicleElectric Technology Detection Parking Vehicle Implement Facilities ParkingMaintain Meters Citywide Citywide Meters ParkingMaintain System Revenue Control Parking Access Upgrades and Seismic Structural Parking Facility CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 13 Enhance Ehne 26 Enhance Ehne 26 Enhance Epn 60 Expand Restore 21 Restore 29 TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE city-owned locations, such as parking garages. locations, suchasparking city-owned oftheCity, chargersparts willbeinstalledat EV order to broaden thepublicinfrastructure to all chargers. theEV In to support service electrical garages thatalready haveat parking sufficient locations–primarily chargers at20city-owned their “home” chargers. isinstallingpublic The City drivers therange EV cantravelextend away from garages to parking public chargers atcity-owned Vehicles (EVs), SanFrancisco hasbegunproviding To enabledrivers from to gasolineto shift Electric the public. help provide availability information to parking demand-responsive meter rate adjustmentsand occupancy.measure parking This willsupport vehicle technology to detection Implement Fire Codes. regulations andvariousPlanning, Building and aswell ascompliancebike parking with ADA systems, surveillance and sump pumps),CCTV lighting, andmechanicalsystems (e.g., HVAC, improvements to elevators, energy efficient improve management. Implements parking and infrastructure facilities to enhance parking andimprovement preservation, ofexistingparking gross revenues. majorrehabilitation, Includes retail space andgenerate over $85Minannual spaces,nearly 15,000parking 90,000sq. of ft. facilitiesthatprovideRestoration of38parking the next 20years.the next accounts for two additionalreplacements within meters were replaced in2014. This estimate spaces.metered parking Allon-street parking Replaces andmodernizes equipment for all 27,000 SFMTA garages. off-street parking acceptors, ticketreaders, andpay stationsat20 ticket dispensers, gate arms, registers, ticket Control Systems (PARCS) software, hardware, Replacement oftheParking Access andRevenue structural andseismicupgrades,structural where needed. assets. parking The second step isto implement step to ensure of SFMTAnecessary theviability oftheSFMTAintegrity garagesisthe firstand analysisPerforming to assessthe a structural 20 years old(oldest garage wasbuiltin1941). ofSFMTA'sMost are structures atleast parking ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions harmful pollution. gas emissions, noisepollution,andother the useofEVs, thusreducing greenhouse locations throughout encourages thecity Providing chargers atmultiple EV greenhouse gasemissions. This reduces vehicle milestraveled and space.make iteasierto findaparking providing information to thepublicwill availability and Improving parking carpooling andcarsharing. forbetter thosebicycling, services public facilities, aswell ashelp provide generating assets, enhance safety of theusefullifeextend ofmajorrevenue- When completed, will thisproject allow for demand-responsive pricing. of payment. Modernized meters willalso convenience by forms accepting non-cash improve reliability andincrease driver meters will existing parking Modernizing are nolongeravailable. insomeofthegarages replacement parts garages. Parkingthe parking equipment staff cannotgeta fromcoherent report different hardware andsoftware versions, requires regular maintenance. Dueto the The PARCS equipment isantiquated and the event ofanatural disaster. increases ofthe facilities in theresiliency structures ofexistingparking integrity Improving theseismicandstructural 2015 COST (rounded) $936,000,000 $744,557,000 $10,000,000 $79,476,000 $45,000,000 $79,000,000 $5,000,000 DRAFT 73 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 74 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Pedestrian Program Total Pedestrian CN15-PE01 N5P0 Pedestrian CN15-PE02 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM CAPITAL Pilots Projects and Strategy Core Pedestrian Citywide Build-Out Build-Out Strategy Full Pedestrian Citywide CAPITAL NEED

NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 84 Enhance Ehne 86 Enhance TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE Francisco. to improve throughout San safety andwalkability implement pilottests for innovative treatments engineering improvements. This program willalso crosswalks; installingcountdown signals andother closed installing 15mphspeedsigns; re-opening corridors andintersections, including: high injury on for particularly thosewhochooseto walk, engineering tools thatimprove safety onstreets Strategy includeimplementationofproven Core Projects asidentifiedinthe Pedestrian minimize disruptionto residents andbusinesses. whereverconstruction possibleto save costs and improvements withotherplanned inconcert streets ofSanFrancisco. willmakethese The City ofthe in improving thesafety andwalkability of pilottreatments thathave proven successful would includethepermanentimplementation A Full ofthePedestrian Build-Out Strategy ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions goal. contributing mode-shift to the City's walk, environment for thosewhochooseto tripsby improvingwalking thewalking collisions inneighborhoodsandincrease The strategy willreduce injuriesand vitality, andenvironmental sustainability. economic development, neighborhood only for individualhealth,butalsofor safety results inmany benefits, not by improving walking Increasing street severely injured ifinvolved incollisions. children, whoare more likelyto be - seniors, peoplewithdisabilities, and users, specificallyvulnerable citizens streets safer andmore accessible for all willmakes theseprojects Implementing on the 70 miles of High Injury Corridors. Injury on the70milesofHigh in keypermanentsafety countermeasures wouldproject fundtargeted investment Francisco streets by 50%by 2021. This severe injuries andfatalitiesonSan to meetMayor EdLee’s goalto reduce miles.on 70keycity This aims project ten years withstrategic capitalinvestment reduce collisions andinjuries by halfin San Francisco Pedestrian Strategy will Fully fundingtheimplementationof 2015 COST (rounded) $363,000,000 $297,000,000 $66,000,000 School ProgramSchool Total School CN15-SC01 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM CAPITAL

(Program) Traffic Calming StreetsSchool CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Rsoe 67 Restore TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE humps. measures, to in-road treatments suchasspeed and signage to pedestrian bulbsandstreetscape calming measures rangefrom improved signals measures atapproximately 150schools. Traffic specifictrafficimplementation ofcontext calming Provides for theevaluation,design, and ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions aged children inSan Francisco. safety, for andpromote allschool walking These willimprove projects pedestrian 2015 COST (rounded) $150,000,000 $150,000,000 DRAFT 75 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 76 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Security ProgramSecurity Total Security CN15-SE01 CN15-SE02 Security Security CN15-SE02 CN15-SE03 Security Security CN15-SE03 N5S0 S CN15-SE04 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM ecurity ecurity CAPITAL

Response Preparedness, & Mitigation, Emergency All-Hazard Response Planning and Management Incident Enhancements System and Security Access Control, Surveillance, Management Management Emergency Transportation Technology In CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 42 Enhance Ehne 44 Enhance Ehne 44 Enhance Epn 45 Expand TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE emphasis on Rail emphasis onRail Transit projects. Security manmade disaster needsoftheSFMTA, withan to address naturalor services or contractual renovations, equipmentprocurement, and/ Projects improvements/ includefacility critical SFMTA facilities, assetsandinfrastructure. mitigation andpreparedness to projects protect emergency ofhigh-priority Implementation exercises. from incidentresponse reports by after-action incident response vehicle. Projects are driven communications equipment,andadedicated Operation Center,at theDepartment satellite offacilitiesimprovementsImplementation security systems.security control, employee preparedness, andcyber programs, centered onsurveillance, access enhancementEncompasses asetofsecurity and Studies.Vulnerability Assessment (TVA) ofrecommendationsImplementation in Threats communication systems. system, digital messageboards, andredundant andmodeling chemical andcontaminant detection on therailsystem. Systems includePROTECT response capabilities for all-hazard disasters during normaloperations aswell asto augment andemployee/customersecurity protection to bestpractices enhance railsystem industry oftechnology from projects Implementation ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions costs andconsequences ofdisasters. employees andcustomers andreduce the Improve for safety andsecurity plans. andimprovement reports after-action the recommendations intheexercise SFMTA doesnotreview andimplement Further, anauditfinding will result ifthe planning andresponse capabilities. greatly enhances SFMTA incident Operations Center,Emergency which equipment andsuppliesfor the These provide projects theproper will result inauditfindings. Commission Failure (CPUC). to comply and Public(TSA) Utilities Transportation Administration Security recommendations ismandated by the The implementationof TVA capabilities ofSFMTA. management operations andemergency These enhance projects thetransportation 2015 COST (rounded) $13,778,000 $57,000,000 $19,087,000 $20,475,000 $3,195,000 Taxi Program N5T0 Taxi CN15-TX01 N5T0 Taxi CN15-TX02 N5T0 Taxi CN15-TX03 N5T0 Taxi CN15-TX05 T CN15-TX04 N5T0 Taxi CN15-TX06 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM axi CAPITAL Rebate Program Accessible Taxi Taxis For Racks Bicycle of TaxiZones) Event Monitoring Increase Special Stands (andPilot Increase Taxi Driver RestStops TaxiImplement Pilot Taxi Cab Pooling Rebate Program Taxi CleanFuel CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 17 Enhance Ehne 50 Enhance Ehne 21 Enhance Ehne 6 Enhance Epn 38 Expand Epn 31 Expand TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE vehicles. willing to purchase alternative fuelaccessible Greater incentives may beprovided to operators services. arguably oneofthemostimportant vehicle inthetaxicabfleetwhichprovides types subsidize costs for oneofthemore expensive wheelchair accessible vehicles. This program will medallion holdersto incentivize thepurchase of accessible vehicles purchased by companies or Establish arebate program for newpurposebuilt bicycle racks.bicycle expand to taxivehicle ensure willhave thatevery racks to willingdrivers. The program willthen as apilotprogram, providingThis willstart bicycle to improve taxiflow. using monitoring personnelduringspecialevents flow andutilization.Apilotprogram willalso test major hailhubsto better taxi manage anddirect additional taxistandswillbeestablishedaround to theouterto increase city, aneffort service In 15 assess demandfor thesefacilities. phase includesa$250,000planningstudyto taxi driver break conditions. The predevelopment restrooms,parklets, orother facilitiesto improve and implementacross thecity. Could include Analyze theneedfor taxioperator break facilities storage, orare inarush. alternative ifyoutransportation require aseat, along theroute, allowing afaster, more flexible along theroute anddrop offridersatany point The driver willthenpick-up asmany riders and drive alongestablishedsetpickuplocations. Driversservice. willthenutilize astandard rate Scrolling LEDlightto indicate theCab-Pooling origins/destinations. Taxis would beprovided a overburdened to focus transit service oncommon Taxis would operate to augment existing cleanest vehicles available. provided to operators willingto purchase the of cleanfuelvehicles. Greater incentives are Rebate program to incentivize thepurchase ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions some oralltrips. optionsfor to useothertransportation Improve options for mobility thoseunable " to therest ofSanFrancisco. own orrent ahigherconnectivity bicycles modal connections, allowing thosewho allows"This for multi- taxisto better serve or require, taxisastheirtravel mode. forcity individualsorgroups whochose, andaidsinmovementcity throughout the taxis canbeeasierfound throughout the Taxi standsestablishlocationssothat stand. pseudo-taxi throughout thecity, asa and3)act stop to thedrivers ,2)dispersetaxis benefits, including:1)provide a rest This installationwould provide multiple ride services are preferredride services over transit. on overcrowded vehicles orwhenshared personal belongings thatrequire space congestion constraints for personswith or along corridors with transitcapacity Provides service for supplementary clean fuelvehicle. the increased costs ofpurchasing anon- vehicle. This incentive isgiven to offset incentive for thepurchase ofacleanfuel fleet; theSFMTA offers drivers a rebate to makea100% aneffort greenIn taxi 2015 COST (rounded) $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $37,200,000 $575,000 $750,000 DRAFT 77 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 78 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Taxi Program Total Taxi CN15-TX07 N5T0 Taxi CN15-TX08 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED PROGRAM CAPITAL

System Management Taxi Improvement Taxi Toplight CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 36 Enhance Rsoe 16 Restore TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE interface portals. portals. interface taxi companies to pay fees through varioususer thatallowswill alsobeafunction drivers and real-time citationsto drivers inthefield. There and compliments as well asallow staff issue to will allow staff trackdriverto history, complaints, driver information from otherdatabaseswhich thatallows thesystembe aninterface to integrate status.insurance andinspection There willalso to monitorability vehicle location,affiliation, for taxicabs. This system would includethe implementation ofafleetmanagementsystem Provide fundingfor thecreation and will beoperated manually. toplights willnotbecontrolled by themeter and indicator, anduniqueSFbrand identity. These space withtheavailability thatdoesnotinterfere lightsonexterior,emergency/panic advertising provide taxivehicles withhighervisibility, Provide orincentivize newtoplights thatwill ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions growth through paperfiles. increasingly difficult tomanagethe expandsitisbecoming as theindustry including vehicle management,and intheindustry files to track activity there are numerous databasesandpaper database through onesystem. Currently to bemanagedinone multiple functions regulation managementby allowing This willhelpstreamline project taxicab feel ofSanFrancisco. safety, andemulate theuniquelookand availability, increase driver andpassenger Toplights willclearlycommunicate taxi 2015 COST (rounded) $10,000,000 $90,000,000 $1,350,000 Traffic Calming Program CN15-TC01 Total CN15-TC02 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED Calming Traffic Calming Traffic PROGRAM CAPITAL Local Streets Traffic Calming- Streets Commercial and - Arterial Traffic Calming CAPITAL NEED NAME

INVESTMENT Ehne 37 Enhance 86 Enhance TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE enhanced by trafficcalming projects. programs. Public spaces canalsobecreated or and Proactive ResidentialArea Improvement sub- Application-Based Residential Traffic Calming, and street closures. Program iscomprised of traffic diverters, signalized ped crosswalks mayprojects include features suchaschicanes, city. ofthemore Some intensive trafficcalming circles, medianislandsatvariouslocationsinthe traffic as speedhumps, pedestrianbulb-outs, Program to installtraffic calmingdevices such be created orenhanced by traffic calming projects. and installinglandscaping. Public spaces canalso implementing road diets, narrowing travel lanes, or busycommercial corridors. Examplesinclude arterialProgram to calmtraffic along 7high-injury ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions of people walking andbicycling. of peoplewalking These alsoenhance projects the comfort by reducing speedinginneighborhoods. Traffic improve calming projects safety and bicycling. enhance ofpeoplewalking thecomfort commercial streets. These also projects and by reducing speedingalongarterial Traffic improve calming projects safety 2015 COST (rounded) $140,000,000 $194,000,000 $54,300,000 DRAFT 79 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 80 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Traffic Signals &Signs CN15-TS01 Total CN15-TS02 CN15-TS03 CN15-TS04 CN15-TS05 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED Signs Signals & Traffic Signs Signals & Traffic Signs Signals & Traffic Signs Signals & Traffic Signs Signals & Traffic PROGRAM CAPITAL Enforcement Photo Traffic Automated Infrastructure Infrastructure Signal andSign Existing Maintain Assets Management TrafficMaintain Signs (Program) New Signals & Fo(rga) Ehne 51 Enhance SFgo (Program) CAPITAL NEED NAME

INVESTMENT Ehne 17 Enhance Ehne 41 Enhance Ehne 48 Enhance Rsoe 72 Restore TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE restriction enforcementrestriction to 14approaches. and theoretical expansionofred lightorturn 14 approaches from wet film to digital technology, Provides for theupgrade ofphoto enforcement for graffiti removal. have higherreflectivity, anda thateases coating where existingsigns are replaced withsigns that includesthegraffiti in thiscategory program, end ofitsusefullife (50years). Funded sign work or replacement ofsignal equipmentthatisatthe amenities. The alsoincludestheupgrade project that lackapedestrianfeature, mastarmsorrelated devices, includingmodifications existingsignalsto Encompass upgrades ofexistingtrafficcontrol detection cameras). detection &video (e.g.,management infrastructure CCTV control curbpainting,parking andexistingtraffic This includesstreet paintmarking/striping, and 1,250newsigns over 20years. new signals, andfive newsignal beacons per year locations. This program anticipates installingfive control hardware, withanemphasisonnew signs, pavement andrelated traffic markings Provides for installationofnewtraffic signals, technologies. number ofIntelligent Transportation System (ITS) communications facilities, andwillimplementa improve obsolete anddeteriorating trafficsignal It willsignificantly and trafficoperations. special events; parking andenhances day-to-day to thepublic;facilitates themanagementof real-time traveler information andparking vehicleand emergency preemption; disseminates in roadway conditions; provides transit priority traffic flow and congestion; responds tochanges real-time information oncurrent transitandauto management system gathers andanalyzes intelligent transportation This citywide ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions state legislature approval. enforcement. likespeed, Others, require include red lightphoto andillegalturn vehicle crashes. Establishedsystems compliance, reducing thenumberof improve safety by intersection improving Automated Photo Enforcement systems modification effort). are ofasignal provided aspart signals improvements andsignal visibility (e.g., where pedestriancountdown injuries through improved traffic control improving safety, reducing thenumberof the Support Vision Zero program by safe andreliable street network. state ofgoodrepair willhelpensure a existinginfrastructure ina Maintaining and othersuchfactors. traffic volumes, configuration, intersection STOP signs are inappropriate, i.e., dueto improved trafficcontrol, often where delays, travel timeandinjuries by locations. This reduces project vehicle improve safety atcrashorotherproblem the Support Vision Zero to project and reliability. and auto trafficto improve transit flow real-time information oncurrent transit communications facilitiesandprovide obsolete anddeteriorating traffic signal The SFgo Program willreplace 2015 COST (rounded) $578,945,000 $771,000,000 $106,080,000 $26,399,000 $52,500,000 $7,000,000 Transit Fixed Guideway CN15-FG06 CN15-FG05 CN15-FG04 CN15-FG03 CN15-FG02 CN15-FG01 Total NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED Guideway Transit Fixed Guideway Transit Fixed Guideway Transit Fixed Guideway Transit Fixed Guideway Transit Fixed Guideway Transit Fixed PROGRAM CAPITAL (Program) Rehabilitation Power System Traction Alarm Detection Subway Fire (Program) Good Repair State of Rail Structure Subway Tunnels Maintain Repair (Program) State ofGood Infrastructure Cable Car Repair (Program) State ofGood Control System Automatic Train CAPITAL NEED NAME

Program INVESTMENT Ehne 81 Enhance Rsoe 77 Restore 40 Restore Epn 45 Expand etr 61 Restore 81 Restore TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE power cables, andOCS. underground infrastructures, communications, switches, substations, feeders, related hardware, This includesoverhead poles, wires, support light railvehicles, andhistoric streetcars. electrically-powered trolleyto support coaches, Muni overhead power andtraction infrastructure improvement ofallcomponents oftheexisting Provides for therehabilitation, replacement, and This would project be initiated andledby BART. voice/alarmemergency communication system. alarm annunciator, power supplyto theFACP and audible alarmnotificationappliances, strobes, control panel(FACP), voice emergency system, scope ofwork isto replace andinstallfire alarm adopted by SanFrancisco Fire Department. The 72 AlarmCode (2010edition)whichiscurrently and NationalFire Protection Association (NFPA) requirements ofSanFrancisco Code (2010 edition) the facilitiesto thefire alarmand detection stations. The work involves voluntarily upgrading systemand detection atshared MuniMetro/BART This willupgrade project thecurrent fire alarm light railandcablecarlines. andrelatedof thetrackway the systems serving Provides for thephaseddesign andreplacement seismic upgrades. on theMuniMetro system. This would include Street, Sunsetand Twin Peaks tunnelstructures This provides for therehabilitation oftheMarket through through 2020and60projects 2029. maintenance equipment, totaling 19projects machinery, traffic control, priority office, and Covers oftrack cable work, awidevariety overall ATCS. CenterManagement operates andmanagesthe and controls safe movements. The System Vehicle Control Center isasystem thatcalculates systems thatcontrols signals andswitches. The Wayside equipmentincludes communications that control systems. thepropulsion andbraking On board vehicle equipmentincludescomputers Control Center, andSystem Center. Management subsystems: Vehicle, distinct Wayside, Vehicle and inlightrailvehicles andiscomposed offour Control, wayside control rooms, onthetracks, (ATCS). ATCS equipmentisstored atCentral replacement oftheAutomatic Train Control System Provides for thephasedrehabilitation and ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions life. that have reached theendoftheiruseful of goodrepair by replacing components maintain theoverhead system inastate focus ofthisprogramThe primary isto equipment. detection a universal design for thefire alarmand incidents, eliminationoffalsealarms, and system, ofminor quickerdetection firein aproperly detection functioning (SFFD) system. This willresult project the SanFrancisco Fire Department with theCentral Control System and Station andwillalsointerface Monitoring Laboratories (UL)Listed Underwriters This system willbemonitored by a the endoftheirusefullife. replacing components thathave reached inastatetrackways ofgood repair by to maintainthelightrailandcablecar focus ofthisprogramThe primary is safe andreliable transit service. Properly maintainingtunnelswillsupport utilize. modern equipmentwhichcablecars standards by providing updated and of attainingoperational performance overall safety andincrease thelikelihood communications equipmentimprove To replace machinery, trackwork, and ATCS.a functional travel reliant timereliability isdirectly on and theoverall MuniSystem. MuniMetro overall oftheMuniMetro capacity Tunnel which increases travel timeandreduces would berequired to operate manually ATCS trainsintheMuniMetro Tunnel Francisco transitsystem. Without the operationsoftheSan the day-to-day ATCSA proper functioning isvitalto 2015 COST (rounded) $1,453,708,000 $2,646,000,000 $417,439,000 $384,770,000 $343,323,000 $25,000,000 $22,184,000 DRAFT 81 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 82 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Transit Optimization&Expansion Program TE01 CN15- CN15-TE04 TE03 CN15- TE02 CN15- NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED & Expansion Optimization Transit & Expansion Optimization Transit & Expansion Optimization Transit & Expansion Optimization Transit PROGRAM CAPITAL Mason Extension Extension Mason Terminal andFort E-Line Northern Street Better Market Improvements Capacity Arena Transit Subway Oceanview 19th Ave /M CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 65 Enhance 50 Enhance 88 Enhance Epn 8 Expand TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE

this extension. Costthis extension. estimate ranges$50M-60M. Fort Mason. The E-Linewould likelyoperate along through anabandonedrailroad tunnelunderneath west from Fisherman's to Fort Mason Wharf thecurrentsecond extends project F-Line terminal including layovers, from E-Lineservice. The allows for operational independence of theF-Line, independent E-Line track loop&terminal that terminal thatconsistscreates ofan anorthern Consists oftwo separate projects. Oneproject Folsom Blvd. St.,Octavia and The Embarcadero. St., ofMarket area isboundedby blocks justnorth (e.g., tracks, cycle bikelanes, parking). The study crosswalks), signal timing, facilities andbicycle and operations, pedestrianfacilities(e.g., sidewalks andboarding islands, transitfacilities developed andevaluated for urbandesign of Better Street Market Project. Concepts willbe ofthe portion ofthetransportation construction environmental review, publicoutreach and planning,Includes conceptual engineering, large numberofidlingvehicles." ensure thatthepower grid canaccommodate a powermodifications; andatraction study to to accommodate crowds; othertrackway area alongexistingtracks;aplatform extension allow for trainsto bestaged;a6-inchraised Improvements migthincludetrack crossovers to development intheArena neighborhood. needed to accommodate growth andplanned improvementsis identifyingtransportation Arena "The Transit Improvements Capacity Project system. Cost estimate ranges$420M-780M. andreliability oftheentirecapacity MuniMetro path.Furthermore,bicycle benefitsthe theproject improved busstop conditions, andanoff-street Avenue to addwidersidewalks, street greening, proposesproject completely redesigning 19th Avenue Street to withRandolph theeast. The Junipero Boulevard Serra to thewest of19th Parkmerced, andamultimodalbridgeconnecting Circle andParkmerced, anewtrack through tunnel under19thAvenue between SaintFrancis major capitalinvestment alight-rail to construct planningoftheproject.The callsfor project further in early2014andtheSFMTA was charged with Stonestown Galleria. The studywasapproved San Francisco State University, Parkmerced and area keydesinationssuchas andbetter serve aims to improve ofallmodeswithinthe service byproduct ofthe19th Avenue Transit Studyand The 19thAvenue/ Project isthe ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions have limited transitaccess options. Fort andareas Mason to thewest, which Fort terminal Mason provides access to overlapping A E-LineandF-Line services. the operational flexibility required for terminal isneededto providenorthern area. A in tripsalongthewaterfront theprojected growthand willserve planned improvementsTEP service isacomponent of the E-Line service users. reliable, efficientand comfortable forall sothat theyarecycling), pleasant, and modes(transit, walking mobility the publicrealm andoptimize sustainable This willimprove project of thequality 337) andPier 70. Rock(Seawall Lotdevelopment atMission with theproposed Warriors Arena retail recent openingoftheExploratorium, and may increase substantiallywiththe deficiencies. addition,visitorIn travel planned growth andaddress current substantially enhanced to accommodate Transit infrastructure needsto be projected ridershipdemand. development andenableSFMTA to meet theParkmercedfor linesserving provide improved transitoperations reliability. These enhancements willalso reduced travel time, andincreased Provides for improved safety andsecurity, 2015 COST (rounded) $400,000,000 $780,000,000 $60,000,000 $27,670,000 Transit Optimization&Expansion Program CN15-TE05 CN15-TE06 CN15-TE09 CN15-TE07 CN15-TE08 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED & Expansion Optimization Transit & Expansion Optimization Transit & Expansion Optimization Transit & Expansion Optimization Transit & Expansion Optimization Transit PROGRAM CAPITAL Transit LightRail Geary Transit BusRapid Geary Capital Projects Muni Forward TransitRapid Avenue Bus Geneva/Harney Extension Light Rail Transit Geneva Avenue CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 52 Enhance Epn 69 Expand 51 Expand Epn 44 Expand 72 Expand TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE

identified. improvements untilfundingfor canbe theLRT Bus Rapid Transit providing near-term Service Subway. This isalong-term proposal withGeary forpriority majorinvestment theCentral after Fourthe county's Corridors planandisthenext isin buslines.line to replace Geary the38Geary lightrailtransit(LRT) asurface-subway, Constructs shelters, andpassengerinformation systems. elements may includededicated lanes, better environmental, Project design andconstruction. to 33rd Ave. The includesplanning, project Blvd., fromon Geary the Transbay Terminal Designs andimplementsarail-ready project BRT signals. 5, 28. Lines6,7,8,M,1,22,K, bus zones, andthedelays associated withtraffic alighting, the timerequired to pullinto andoutof vehicles associated withcustomer boarding and also minimize delays encountered by Munitransit of travel to would transitstops and stations. It increase transit ridershipandimprove thepath busy intersections. The proposed program would design changesto reduce delays for transitat to coordinate withapaving orstreet project, addingbus orpedestrianbulbs intersection, upgrades ormodifyingsignal phasesatan These improvements may includesmallsignal be minimized through trafficcontrol. T-Third line. Alongtheroute, vehicle will conflicts development to Caltrain,and linking BART, andthe Candlestick Point/Hunters Point Shipyard project along GenevaandHarney Way, the supporting development facility The includesBRT project determined. would withstationlocationsto occur be at-grade T-Third terminus atSunnydale Station.Operations Bayshore Boulevard andthento theexisting Geneva Avenue from theGreen to Railyard lightrail track2.7miles along Entails extending ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions reliability andcomfort. passengers withimproved speed, alongthecorridor,service providing This willprovide project ahighercapacity travel timealongthecorridor. andreduce andattractiveness comfort reliability, personcapacity, passenger This would project increase service decreased operational resource needs. shouldalsoresult in on-time performance performance. Improved reliability and transit travel timereliability andon-time The improvements result ingreater Development. Candlestick Point/Hunters Point Shipyard Priority Development Areas, andthe that linksregional transitservices, improve reliability alongthecorridor This willreduce project travel timeand needs.long-term rail service needed meet to operational flexibility This would project provide for the 2015 COST (rounded) $1,896,000,000 $328,000,000 $154,042,000 $603,945,000 $5,300,000 DRAFT 83 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT 84 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX Transit Optimization&Expansion Program CN15-TE10 Total CN15-TE11 CN15-TE14 CN15-TE13 CN15-TE12 NUMBER CAPITAL NEED NEED & Expansion Optimization Transit & Expansion Optimization Transit & Expansion Optimization Transit & Expansion Optimization Transit & Expansion Optimization Transit PROGRAM CAPITAL Term Term Long- Strategy: Capacity Rail Wharf Wharf to Fisherman's T-Third Phase3 Terminal Intermodal Southern Third Street Enhancements Programmatic Strategy: Capacity Rail Term Near- Strategy: Capacity Rail CAPITAL NEED NAME INVESTMENT Ehne 74 Enhance Ehne 12 Enhance 62 Enhance Epn 44 Expand Restore 37 TYPE PRIORITY PRIORITY SCORE

the existingsystem. of existingMunilightrail system orexpansionof provide significant increases inoperating capacity corridor investments andinfrastructure Major that Lombard Corrdior. $643M -$2.6B. Future studiesmightincludethe Costreliability andcomfort. estimate ranges from along thecorridor, introducing improved speed, This willprovide project service ahighercapacity Beachandinto Fisherman'sthrough North Wharf. planned Central Subway terminal atStockton/Clay rail lineapproximately from the 1milenorth, Provides for ofthe thestudyandextension T-Third with thefuture service. GenevaBRT and withtheexistingCaltrain service connectivity area improvements, thiswillimprove transit Station. Combined withintermodal station the Extends T-Line to theBayshore Caltrain projects. ofregular railreplacementpart orenhancement would beimplemented ataprogrammatic level as significant improvements were identifiedthat study. Capacity horizon oftheRail However, less mid- andlong-term concepts isbeyond the their cost andbenefits relative to theprioritized timelinefor theseenhancementsdelivery given were line, a identifiedalongevery reasonable and impediments. While major enhancements by-line review ofcurrent operational painpoints Capacity The Rail Technical Panel aline- conducted additional turnbackcapacity. improved trainsignalization andprioritization, areas,and removing atportal modalconflicts crowded conditions. Investments includereducing existing system to bringnearterm relief to Investments atkeybottlenecklocationsinthe ECITO JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Appendix C.Capital NeedDescriptions Francisco. oflifemaintaining thequality inSan growth, enhancingurbanmobility, and are criticalto thecontinued economic be over capacity. These investments would and corridors thatotherwise to theareas transitservice capacity system expansionwillprovide high efficiently even withthis growth. The Franciscans to continue to move the existingsystem willallow San 2040. These majorenhancements to of peakhourlightrailboardings by an 80percent increase inthenumbers Travel demandforecasts indicate over efficient and reliable rapid transit service. neighborhoods inSan Francisco, with generator andoneofthemostdense Beach,aregional trip andNorth Wharf would Fisherman'sExtension connect Caltrain passengers. residents ofsoutheast SanFrancisco and options andgreater for connectivity Provides for increased transittravel ofservice. more efficientdelivery design andadjustments, andallow for increase ofbothservice intheflexibility investments to provide anecessary will leverage State ofGoodRepair Strategy Programmatic Enhancements disruptions. to service Capacity The Rail operationsoradjustments flexible service not designed withconsideration for The current Munilightrailsystem was canberealized.capacity until more significant increases in allow thesystem to continue functioning incremental improvements capacity to RCS Near-Term investments willprovide overcrowded nature ofthesystem. The to customers duetoimpacts the havedisruptions to significant service onadailybasis.at capacity Even minor The SFMTA lightrailsystem operates 2015 COST (rounded) $1,010,000,000 $8,002,000,000 $2,600,000,000 $50,320,000 $62,000,000 $25,000,000 DRAFT 85 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN APPENDIX DRAFT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

86 SFMTA FY 2014 - FY - CAPITAL2034 SFMTA FY PLAN2014 Kate Kate Toran, Director of Taxis &Accessible Services Candace Sue, Director ofCommunications Tom Maguire, Director ofSustainableStreets General CounselRob Maerz, Alicia John-Baptiste, ChiefofStaff Henry, DirectorMelvyn ofSystem Safety Vince Harris, Director ofCapital Programs &Construction John Haley, Director of Transit Donald Ellison,Director ofHumanResources Breen,Kate Director ofGovernment Affairs Bose,Sonali Director ofFinance &Information Technology Edward D. Director of Reiskin, Transportation Cristina Rubke Joél Ramos Malcolm Heinicke Borden Gwyneth Brinkman, Vice-Chair Cheryl Tom Nolan,Chair SFMTA TEAM EXECUTIVE SFMTA BOARD DIRECTORS OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS http://sfmta.photoshelter.com/ All imagesandfigures by theSan Francisco Municipal unlessnoted. Agency Transportation involved to for thisplanningeffort. contributing theirtimeandexpertise the SanFrancisco Municipal Transportation Agency. We would liketo whowas thankeveryone Development ofthisCapital Planhasinvolved alarge numberofindividualsassociated with Ito Darton Alex Demisch Annie Chung PHOTOGRAPHY & FIGURES FIGURES & PHOTOGRAPHY CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN TEAM DRAFT 87 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2034 CAPITAL PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS DRAFT

88

SFMTA Fiscal Year 2015 - Fiscal Year 2034 Capital Plan

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency 1 South San Francisco, CA 94103

www.sfmta.com