In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020. Crl.M.P. No.2154/2020

Selvaraj S/o. Lakshmanan (A3) : Petitioner

/Vs./

Forest Range Officer, Vellimalai Forest Range, STOR No.2/2019 of Vellimalai Forest Range, Rep. by Spl. Public Prosecution (Forest Cases), Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru R.S. Nadaraja Moorthy, praying to extend the time to appear before the court concerned. ORDER Perused the petition and the written submission of the learned Special

Public Prosecutor.

Offence alleged u/s 21(d)(e)(f) and 2(1) of Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882 and Sections 27 and 29 of Wildlife Protection Act.

The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail as per order in

Crl.M.P.No.1324/2020, dated 08.05.2020 with condition that the petitioner should appear before the court concerned within a period of 30 days from the date of order.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition that due to

COVID-19, the petitioner is not able to appear before the court concerned within the stipulated time and prayed for extension of extension of time to appear.

The learned Special Public Prosecutor (Forest Cases) stated in the written submission that the reasons stated by the petitioner for the delay is not genuine, because the petitioner filed the anticipatory bail in Crl.M.P. No.1272/2020 during COVID-19 lockdown period.

Considering the reasons stated in the petition, this court is inclined to extend 30 days and this court directs the petitioner to appear before the court concerned within 30 days from today, failing which the anticipatory bail stands automatically cancelled and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Special Judge for Forest Offence Cases, Nagercoil. The Forest Range Officer, Vellimalai Forest Range. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020. Crl.M.P. No.2159/2020

Dallus S/o. Christopher (A11) : Petitioner

/Vs./

Forest Range Officer, Vellimalai Forest Range, STOR No.2/2019 of Vellimalai Forest Range, Rep. by Spl. Public Prosecution (Forest Cases), Nagercoil. : Respondent

Public Prosecutor.

Offence alleged u/s 21(d)(e)(f) and 2(1) of Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882 and Sections 27 and 29 of Wildlife Protection Act.

The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail as per order in

Crl.M.P.No.1272/2020, dated 05.05.2020 with condition that the petitioner should appear before the court concerned within a period of 30 days from the date of order.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition that due to

COVID-19, the petitioner is not able to appear before the court concerned within the stipulated time and prayed for extension of extension of time to appear.

Considering the reasons stated in the petition, this court is inclined to extend one month time and this court directs the petitioner to appear before the court concerned within one month from today, failing which the anticipatory bail stands automatically cancelled and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Arulkumar S/o. Francis (A5) : Petitioner

/Vs./

Forest Range Officer, Vellimalai Forest Range, STOR No.2/2019 of Vellimalai Forest Range, Rep. by Spl. Public Prosecution (Forest Cases), Nagercoil. : Respondent

Public Prosecutor.

Offence alleged u/s 21(d)(e)(f) and 2(1) of Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882 and Sections 27 and 29 of Wildlife Protection Act.

The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail as per order in

Crl.M.P.No.1276/2020, dated 05.05.2020 with condition that the petitioner should appear before the court concerned within a period of 30 days from the date of order.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition that due to

COVID-19, the petitioner is not able to appear before the court concerned within the stipulated time and prayed for extension of extension of time to appear.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Arulkumar S/o. Francis (A1) : Petitioner

/Vs./

Forest Range Officer, Vellimalai Forest Range, STOR No.1/2019 of Vellimalai Forest Range, Rep. by Spl. Public Prosecution (Forest Cases), Nagercoil. : Respondent

Public Prosecutor.

Offence alleged u/s 21(d)(e)(f) and 2(1) of Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882 and Sections 27 and 29 of Wildlife Protection Act.

The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail as per order in

Crl.M.P.No.1247/2020, dated 05.05.2020 with condition that the petitioner should appear before the court concerned within a period of 30 days from the date of order.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition that due to

COVID-19, the petitioner is not able to appear before the court concerned within the stipulated time and prayed for extension of extension of time to appear.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Special Judge for Forest Offence Cases, Nagercoil. The Forest Range Officer, Vellimalai Forest Range. Crl.M.P. No. 2195/2020 Hence, considering the present

25.06.2020 COVID-19 scenario, this court is

Order pronounced. inclined to relax the condition totally.

Perused the petition and written In the result, condition is totally submission of the learned Public relaxed and accordingly this petition is

Prosecutor. allowed.

The learned counsel for the Principal Sessions Judge. petitioner stated in the petition that as per order in Crl.M.P. No.1134/2020, dated 17.03.2020, the petitioner has been complying the condition for the past 79 days and prayed that the condition may be relaxed.

In the written submission, the learned Special Public Prosecutor stated that the petitioner has been complying the condition from 24.03.2020 to

04.05.2020 and from 16.05.2020 to

23.06.2020 and not complied the condition from 05.06.2020 to

15.06.2020.

The petitioner/accused has complied the condition for 79 days. Crl.M.P. No. 2196/2020 Hence, considering the present

25.06.2020 COVID-19 scenario, this court is

Order pronounced. inclined to relax the condition totally.

Perused the petition and written In the result, condition is totally submission of the learned Special Public relaxed and accordingly this petition is

Prosecutor. allowed.

The learned counsel for the Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. petitioner stated in the petition that as per order in Crl.M.P. No.1135/2020, dated 17.03.2020, the petitioner has been complying the condition for the past 79 days and prayed that the condition may be relaxed.

In the written submission, the learned Special Public Prosecutor stated that the petitioner has been complying the condition from 24.03.2020 to

05.05.2020 and from 16.05.2020 to

23.06.2020 and not complied the condition from 05.06.2020 to

15.06.2020.

The petitioner/accused has complied the condition for 79 days. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020. Crl.M.P. No.2238/2020

Heron @ Jeron S/o. Yanose : Petitioner

/Vs./

Forest Range Officer, Vellimalai Forest Range Office, STOR No.2/2019 of Vellimalai Forest Range Office, Rep. by Spl. Public Prosecution (Forest Cases), Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru R. Godwin Kumar, praying to extend the time to appear before the court concerned. ORDER Perused the petition and the written submission of the learned Special

Public Prosecutor.

Offence alleged u/s 21(d)(e)(f) and Section 35, 36 of Tamil Nadu Forest

Act, 1882 and Section 2(1) Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882 and Sections 27 and 29 of

Wildlife Protection Act, 1992.

The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail as per order in

Crl.M.P.No.1296/2020, dated 05.05.2020 with condition that the petitioner should appear before the court concerned within a period of 30 days from the date of order.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition that due to

COVID-19, the petitioner is not able to appear before the court concerned within the stipulated time and prayed for extension of extension of time to appear. The learned Special Public Prosecutor (Forest Cases) stated in the written submission that the reasons stated by the petitioner for the delay is not genuine, because the petitioner filed the anticipatory bail in Crl.M.P. No.1296/2020 during COVID-19 lockdown period.

Considering the reasons stated in the petition, this court is inclined to extend 30 days time and this court directs the petitioner to appear before the court concerned within 30 days from today, failing which the anticipatory bail stands automatically cancelled and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Monday the 22nd day of June, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 2242/2020

Vibin, S/o Johnrose (A3) : Petitioner

/Vs./

Inspector of Police, Puthukadai Police Station, Crime No.298/2020 of Puthukadai Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru N. Chellappan, u/s 439 Cr.P.C. praying to grant bail to the petitioner. ORDER

Perused the petition filed by the petitioner through online and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 379 IPC.

The case of the prosecution is that on 13.06.2020 while the police party were on roanth duty, they found three vehicles carrying red sand wroth about

Rs.3,000/-. Hence the charge.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition filed through online that the petitioner is innocent and this is a false case foisted only for statistical purpose and the investigation is over and the vehicles and contraband involved were already seized and the petitioner is under custody from 13.06.2020 and he is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for bail to the petitioner..

The learned Public Prosecutor submitted the written objection and stated that the present petitioner is A3 and the accused persons had involved in illicit transportation of 1 unit red sand in 2 tempos.

The accused person has been arrested only on 13.06.2020, and it is too early to consider this application and A2, A4 and A6 are still absconding and he has serious objection to grant bail to the petitioner.

Considering the nature of the offences alleged to be committed by the petitioner/A3 that he had involved in illicit possession of one unit of red sand in two tempos and A2, A4 and A6 are still absconding, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner/A3. Hence this petition is dismissed.

In the result, this petition is dismissed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 22nd day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 2256/2020

Manikandan S/o. Swamidhass (A2) : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Boothapandy Police Station, Crime No. 219/2020 of Boothapandy Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru S.K. Prabhu, u/s 439 Cr.P.C. praying to grant bail to the petitioner.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor filed through online.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 294(b), 506(ii), 323,

324, 302 and 341 of IPC.

The case of prosecution is that on 16.05.2020 at about 8.00 P.M. the accused persons brutally attacked the informant, while it was resisted by the deceased, she got head injury and succumbed to death. Hence the charge.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted in the petition filed through online that the deceased is the petitioner's brother's aunt and his brother got married with the deceased's daughter and the petitioner has no specific overt act and in fact, the deceased has accidentally fell down and sustained head injury, due to that effect she had died. The petitioner's brother Mathan has been brutally attacked by the informant and it was admitted by him in the alleged FIR, pertaining to the fatal attack caused by the informant, his brother is in dead bed and to escape from the intentional attack of the informant, he lodged this false complaint as deceased accidentally fell down and succumbed and if it was happened as alleged by the prosecutor, definitely the informant would have sustained some injuries, but nothing was disclosed that the informant sustained injuries. The petitioner is innocent and he is no way connected with the alleged offences against him and he is in judicial custody from 17.05.2020 and the alleged property has been already recovered from

A1 and A3. This is the 2nd application and the earlier application was dismissed on the ground that it was too early and now the change of circumstance is the petitioner is under judicial custody for the past 32 days and the 1st remand extension is also over and the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for bail to the petitioner.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written objection that the present petitioner is A2 and it is case of 302 and the present petitioner is having specific overt act of brutally assaulting the defacto complainant using “சவககக கமகப ”.

Moreover, the accused person has been arrested only on 18.05.20 and it is too early to consider this application and the earlier application for the present petitioner has been dismissed on 29.05.2020 vide Crl.M.P. No.1820/2020 and there is no change in circumstances and the earlier applications of A1 and A3 were dismissed only on

11.06.2020 vide Crl.M.P. No.2017/2020 and on 01.06.2020 vide Crl.M.P.

No.1870/2020 respectively and chemical analytical report has not yet been received.

Since the investigation is in pre-mature stage, he has serious objection to grant bail to the petitioner.

Considering the grievous nature of the offences alleged to be committed by the petitioner/A2 and also considering the objection of the learned Public

Prosecutor that the investigation is in premature stage and the earlier application for bail filed by the petitioner/A2 has been dismissed on 29.05.2020 in

Crl.M.P.No.1820/2020 and there is no change in circumstances, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence this petition is dismissed.

In the result, this petition is dismissed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 2263/2020

Revanth S/o. Chandra Kumar (A3) : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Aralvoimozhi Police Station, Crime No. 374/2020 of Aralvoimozhi Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru T.M. Sreekumar, u/s 439 Cr.P.C. praying to grant bail to the petitioner.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor filed through online.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 294(b), 324, 307,

506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, 2002.

The case of prosecution is that on 04.06.2020 at about 7.00 P.M., the accused persons have jointly came to the infornant's house and used filthy words against the informant and his wife and stabbed them with knife and threatened them.

Hence the charge.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent and he is no way connected in this case and no such occurrence was happened alleged in the FIR and the informant has given a false complaint against the petitioner. The petitioner is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for bail to the petitioner.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written objection that the present present petitioner is A3 and the defacto complainant is the father in law of A1 and as per the FIR, the A1 had assaulted defacto complainant’s daughter, since things went out of hands, the de facto complainant was constrained to bring his daughter to his home and thereafter, A1 had come along with his friends to the defacto complainant’s house and used foul language, threatened and had inhumanly assaulted the defacto complainant’s daughter, who was 8 months pregnant (near her collar bone) and the de facto complainant (near his eyes) using knife. It is a very recent occurrence and A3 has been arrested only on 15.06.2020 and it is too early to consider this application and the earlier application of A1 and A2 was dismissed only on 22.06.2020 in Crl.M.P. No.2255/2020 and in Crl.M.P. No.2211/2020 respectively. The accused person’s fiendish act of stabbing an innocent 8 months pregnant women is highly condemnable. Even though this is a family matter and injured has been discharged from hospital, considering the fact that even in the event of allowing this application it is unsafe for the de facto complainant’s daughter and for her child in her womb, therefore he has serious objection to grant bail to the petitioner. Considering the nature of the offencesa alleged to be committed by the petitioner/A3 and also considering the judicial custody of the petitioner/A3 for the past 40 days, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

In the result, the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Boothapandy within one month from today and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Judicial Magistrate, Boothpandy. The Inspector of Police, Aralvoimozhi Police Station. The Superintendent, District Jail, Nagercoil. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 2264/2020

1. Ponselvan S/o. Yobu (A1)

2. Gnanaraj S/o. Paramanandhan (A2) : Petitioners

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Aralvoimozhi Police Station, Crime No. 387/2020 of Aralvoimozhi Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru B. Lakshminarayanan, u/s 439 Cr.P.C. praying to grant bail to the petitioners.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

The petitioners have been charged for the offence u/s 294(b), 324, 307,

506(ii) of IPC.

The case of prosecution is that on 11.06.2020, the petitioners used filthy language against the informant, grievously hurt and attempted to murder the defacto complainant's brother with sickle and criminally intimidated him. Hence the charge. The learned counsel for the petitioners stated in the petition that the petitioners are innocent and due to previous enmity, this false case has been foisted against the petitioners and the petitioners never did such act mentioned in the FIR and the investigation is already over and the petitioners are in judicial custody from

15.06.2020. The petitioners are ready to abide by any condition and prayed for bail to the petitioners.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written objection that the present petitioners are A1 and A2 and it is a very recent occurrence and the present petitioners has been arrested only on 15.06.2020 and it is too early to consider this application. Due to previous enmity, the accused persons had used foul language, threated, and had brutally assaulted the de facto complainant’s brother in his head, shoulder, hand and leg using Aruval. Even though the injured person has been discharged from hospital, considering the gravity of the offence, he has serious objection.

Considering the nature of the offencesa alleged to be committed by the petitioners/A1 and A2 and also considering the judicial custody of the petitioners/A1 and A2 for the past 40 days and also considering the reply of the learned Public

Prosecutor that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

In the result, the petitioners are ordered to be enlarged on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Boothapandy within one month from today and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Principal Sessions Judge. To The Judicial Magistrate, Boothpandy. The Inspector of Police, Aralvoimozhi Police Station. The Superintendent, District Jail, Nagercoil. The counsel for the petitioner.

Crl.M.P. No. 2277/2020 26.03.2020 and thereafter he was not

25.06.2020 complied the condition due to Covid-19

Order pronounced. situation, this court is inclined to relax

Perused the petition and written the condition totally. submission of the learned Public In the result, condition is totally

Prosecutor. relaxed and accordingly this petition is

The learned counsel for the allowed. petitioner stated in the petition that as Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. per order in Crl.M.P. No.1145/2020, dated 13.03.2020, the petitioner has been complying the condition from

17.03.2020 to 27.03.2020 and thereafter he did not comply the condition due to lockdow and prayed that the condition may be relaxed.

In the written submission, the learned Public Prosecutor stated that the accused person had complied the condition from 17.03.2020 till

26.03.2020.

Considering the fact that the petitioner/accused had complied the condition from 17.03.2020 to Crl.M.P. No. 2278/2020 In the result, condition is totally

25.06.2020 relaxed and accordingly this petition is

Order pronounced. allowed.

Perused the petition and written Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition that as per order in Crl.M.P. No.1298/2020, dated 05.05.2020, the petitioner has been complying the condition from

04.06.2020 and prayed that the condition may be relaxed.

In the written submission, the learned Public Prosecutor stated that the accused person has been complying the condition from 04.06.2020 till

23.06.2020.

Considering the fact that the petitioner/accused had been complying the condition from 04.06.2020, this court is inclined to relax the condition totally. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020. Crl.M.P. No.2279/2020

Kurus Anthony S/o. Anadhas .. Petitioner

/Vs./ Sub Inspector of Police, Rajakkamangalam Police Station, Crime No.48/2020 of Rajakkamangalam Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. .. Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru C. Ramaswamy, praying to extend the time to appear before the court concerned. ORDER

Perused the petition and the written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

Offence alleged u/s 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC.

The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail as per order in

Crl.M.P.No.1306/2020, dated 05.05.2020 with condition that the petitioner should appear before the court concerned within a period of 30 days from the date of order.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition that due to

Corona lockdown, the court is functioning from 08.06.2020 only. So, the petitioner was unable to appear before the court concerned within the stipulated time and prayed for extension of extension of time to appear.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written submission that it is mere application for extension of time and he has no objection serious objection.

Considering the reasons stated in the petition and also considering the reply of the learned Public Prosecutor that he has no serious objection, this court is inclined to extend one month time and this court directs the petitioner to appear before the court concerned within one month from today, failing which the anticipatory bail stands automatically cancelled and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil The Sub Inspector of Police, Rajakkamangalam Police Station. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 2280/2020

Jenis S/o. Thomas Selvaraj : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Eraniel Police Station, Crime No. 504/2020 of Eraniel Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru M. Beslin Jagadheese, u/s 439 Cr.P.C., praying to grant bail to the petitioner.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor filed through online.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 341, 294(b) and 395 of IPC.

The case of prosecution is that on 14.06.2020 at about 7.30 P.M., the petitioner and other accused restrained the informant and used filthy words against him and extorted Rs.60,000/- from the informant. Hence the charge.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition filed through online that the petitioner is innocent and he has not involved in any offences and the name of the petitioner was not mentioned in the FIR and on the basis of the confession, his name was implicated in this case and the petitioner is in judicial custody from 17.06.2020 onwards. The petitioner is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for bail to the petitioner.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written objection that the present petitioner is A6 and was arrested on 17.06.2020 and the accused persons had restrained the de facto complainant, used foul language, threatened, assaulted and had robbed Rs.60,000/- and the property has not yet been recovered.

Considering the grievous nature of the offences alleged to be committed by the petitioner/Accused that he had robbed Rs.60,000/- from the defacto complainant and also considering the objection of the learned Public Prosecutor that the property is yet to be recovered, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner/accused. Hence this petition is dismissed.

In the result, this petition is dismissed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Thursday, the 25th day of June, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 2281/2020

Selvaraj S/o. Vadivel Nadar ..Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Thuckalay Police Station, Crime No. 682/2020 of Thuckalay Police Station Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. .. Respondent

This petition is submitted by the accused through the District Legal

Services Authority, Kanyakumari District praying to grant bail to him.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 294(b), 323, 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act.

The petitioner submitted that he is in judicial custody from 17.06.2020 and the case is pending before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Padmanabhapuram and the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for bail to him.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written objection that the the defacto complainant and the accused person are husband and wife and due to their family dispute, the accused person had used foul language, threatened her by pouring kerosene upon her and tried to lighten up the matchbox and had also assaulted her and the injured person did not take any treatment in hospital.

Considering the nature of the offences alleged to be committed by the petitioner/accused and also considering the reply of the learned Public Prosecutor that the injured person did not take any treatment in the hospital, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

In the result, the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.I, Padmanabhapuram within one month from today and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Padmanabhapuram The Inspector of Police, Thuckalay Police Station. The Superintendent, District Jail, Nagercoil. The Secretary, District Legal Aid Services Authority, Nagercoil. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 2282/2020

A. Velmurugan, S/o. Arumughakan (A3) .. Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Rajakkamangalam Police Station, Crime No. 268/2020 of Rajakkamangalam Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. .. Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru V. Balaji Rajaram, u/s 439

Cr.P.C., praying to grant bail to the petitioner.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written objection submitted by the learned

Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 341, 294(b), 427 and

307 IPC.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and two other persons had restrained the defacto complainant, abused in filthy words and attacked him with chopper and damaged the bike and cow farm of the defacto complainant worth about Rs.10,000/-. Hence the charge.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition that the bail application in Crl.M.P.No. 1648/2020 was allowed on 18.05.2020 and interim bail was granted to the petitioner directing him to move regular bail after his release from the jail and prayed for bail to the petitioner.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written submission that the present petitioner is A3 and interim bail has already been granted to the petitioner on

18.05.2020 in Crl.M.P. No.1648/2020 and now the petitioner is seeking for regular bail.

Considering the fact that the petitioner/A3 was already granted interim bail on 18.05.2020 in Crl.M.P.No.1648/2020 and the other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

In the result, the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.III, Nagercoil within one month from today and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of May, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Nagercoil. The Sub Inspector of Police, Rajakkamangalam Police Station. The Superintendent, District Jail, Nagercoil. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 2283/2020

Chelladurai @ Chella S/o. Thangaraj : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Vadasery Police Station, Crime No. 13/2020 of Vadasery Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru K.S. Palani u/s 439 Cr.P.C. praying to grant bail to the petitioner. ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor filed through online.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 341, 294(b), 324,

506(ii) of IPC.

The case of prosecution is that the accused person demanded money from the defacto complainant and when he refused to give money, the accused uesed filthy language against the informant and assaulted him with knife and threatened him. Hence the charge.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted in the petition filed through online that the petitioner was arrested on 20.01.2020 and he is in judicial custody for more than 100 days and the investigation is completed and the respondent police have not filed charge sheet in court even after the completion of statutory period of 60 days and prayed for bail to the petitioner.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written objection that the present petitioner is A1 and was arrested on 27.02.2020 and as and when the accused person asked money from the defacto complainant for consuming alcohol and the de facto complainant gave Rs.10/- to him, the accused person had restrained him, used foul language, threatened and had assaulted the defacto complainant in his head using wire cutting blade.

Considering the nature of the offences alleged to be committed by the petitioner/A1 and also considering the judicial custody of the petitioner/A1 from

27.02.2020, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

In the result, the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil within one month from today and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil. The Sub Inspector of Police, Vadasery Police Station. The Superintendent, District Jail, Nagercoil. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 2284/2020

Udaya Prakash, S/o. Kochappan Pillai .. Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Arumanai Police Station, Crime No. 340/2020 of Arumanai Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. .. Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru V. Balaji Rajaram, u/s 439 Cr.P.C., praying to grant bail to the petitioner. ORDER

Perused the petition and written objection submitted by the learned

Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 294(b), 323, 506(ii)

IPC and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner abused in filthy words, assaulted the defacto complainant, caused injuries and threatened her. Hence the charge.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition that the bail application in Crl.M.P.No. 1672/2020 was allowed on 18.05.2020 and interim bail was granted to the petitioner directing him to move regular bail after his release from the jail and prayed for bail to the petitioner. The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written submission that interim bail has already been granted for the petitioner on 18.05.2020 in Crl.M.P.

No.1672/2020 and now the petitioner is seeking for regular bail.

Considering the fact that the petitioner/accused was already granted interim bail on 18.05.2020 in Crl.M.P.No.1672/2020 and the other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

In the result, the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai within one month from today and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai. The Sub Inspector of Police, Arumanai Police Station. The Superintendent, District Jail, Nagercoil. The counsel for the petitioner.

Rajagopal, S/o Thapasi (A2) : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Marthandam Police Station, Crime No. 72/2020 of Marthandam Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru T. Johnson, praying to extend the time to appear before the court concerned. ORDER Perused the petition and the written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

Offence alleged u/s 4(1) (A) TNP Act.

The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail as per order in

Crl.M.P.No.1368/2020, dated 27.04.2020 with condition that the petitioner should appear before the court concerned within a period of 30 days from the date of order.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition that due to lockdown, the petitioner is not able to appear before the court concerned within the stipulated time and prayed for extension of extension of time to appear.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written submission that it is a mere application for extension of time and he has no serious objection. Considering the reasons stated in the petition, this court is inclined to extend one month time and this court directs the petitioner to appear before the court concerned within one month from today, failing which the anticipatory bail stands automatically cancelled and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai. The Sub Inspector of Police, Marthandam Police Station. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020. Crl.M.P. No.2296/2020

1. Hameetha Beevi @ Hameedha Beevi (A2) 2. Mohamed Mubeen @ Mohamed Mubin (A3) 3. Ashmiya Banu @ Asmiya Banu (A4) : Petitioners

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Eraniel Police Station, Crime No. 288/2019 of Eraniel Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru R.Ariharan, praying to extend the time to appear before the court concerned. ORDER Perused the petition and the written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

Offence alleged u/s 294(b), 420 and 506(i) of IPC.

The petitioners were granted anticipatory bail as per order in Crl.M.P.

Nos.1346 and 1367/2020, dated 27.04.2020 with condition that the petitioners should appear before the court concerned within a period of 30 days from the date of order.

The learned counsel for the petitioners stated in the petition filed through online that due to COVID-19 lockdown, the petitioners are not able to appear before the court concerned within the stipulated time and prayed for extension of extension of time to appear.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written submission that it is mere application for extension of time and he has no serious objection.

Considering the reasons stated in the petition, this court is inclined to extend one month time and this court directs the petitioners to appear before the court concerned within one month from today, failing which the anticipatory bail stands automatically cancelled and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. The Sub Inspector of Police, Eraniel Police Station. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020. Crl.M.P. No.2297/2020

1. Sahaya Pratheesh S/o. Paniadimai (A1) 2. Ramesh S/o. Vincent (A2) : Petitioners

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Colachel Police Station, Crime No.63/2020 of Colachel Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru A. Paulraj, praying to extend the time to appear before the court concerned. ORDER Perused the petition and the written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

Offence alleged u/s 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act.

The petitioners were granted anticipatory bail as per order in

Crl.M.P.No.1299/2020, dated 21.04.2020 with condition that the petitioners should appear before the court concerned within a period of 30 days from the date of order.

The learned counsel for the petitioners stated in the petition that due to

COVID-19 lockdown, the petitioners are not able to appear before the court concerned within the stipulated time and prayed for extension of extension of time to appear. The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written submission that it is mere application for extension of time and he has no serious objection.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. The Sub Inspector of Police, Colachel Police Station. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 2298/2020

Jain Kingsly S/o. Thavasimuthu : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Marthandam Police Station, Crime No.764/2020 of Marthandam Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru A. David, u/s 439 Cr.P.C. praying to grant bail to the petitioner.

ORDER

Perused the petition filed through online and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 379 of IPC and

Section 21(1) of M& M (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957.

The case of the prosecution is that on 15.06.2020 at about 6.00 A.M., the petitioner illegally transported stone (fU';fy;) without any permission from the

Government. Hence the charge.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition filed through online that the petitioner is in no way connected with the alleged offence and he has been implicated in the crime due to his wordy altercation with the jeep driver of

Vilavancode Taluk on the previous day, who hails from the native of the petitioner and with that motive, the petitioner and his empty vehicle was taken from his house and the case was foisted against him and the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for bail to the petitioner.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written objection that the petitioner (Driver) has involved in theft and illicit transportation of 1 unit “கரஙஙகலங” and he has been arrested only on 15.06.2020, therefore it is too early to consider this application. The occurrence took place on 15.06.20 (During this lockdown), as and when this whole world is concerned about this outbreak, these accused persons have intend to enrich themselves in an unjust manner. This occurrence raises strong apprehension that, taking undue advantage of this Nation-wide lockdown, these accused persons have intended to use the same for black marketing. Moreover, Cases involving depletion of mines and minerals without valid pass is highly condemnable and curtailment of such activities at the earliest point of time is highly essential.

Having regard to the present scenario and considering the environmental concern and the consequences thereof, he has serious objection to grant bail to the petitioner.

Considering the nature of the offences alleged to be committed by the petitioner/accused and also considering the judicial custody of the petitioner/Accused for the past 9 days, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. In the result, the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai within one month from today and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai. The Sub Inspector of Police, Marthandam Police Station. The Superintendent, District Jail, Nagercoil. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 2300/2020

Selvaraj S/o. Ponniyan : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Kulasekharam Police Station, Crime No. 412/2020 of Kulasekharam Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru D. Caston Clitus, u/s 439 Cr.P.C. praying to grant bail to the petitioner. ORDER

Perused the petition filed by the petitioner through online and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 4 (1-A) of TNP Act.

The case of the prosecution is that on 24.05.2020, the petitioner manufactured some country alcohol and while the respondent police was in rounth, they found that the petitioner is carrying some country alcohol in a water can. Hence the charge.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition filed through online that the petitioner never manufactured or boiled any country alcohol and due to ill motive, the respondent has planned to foist a false case against the petitioner and he is in no way connected with any offence as alleged in the FIR and the petitioner is in judicial custody for the past 27 days and the earlier bail application in

Crl.M.P. No.2060/2020 was dismissed on 17.06.2020 and the petitioner is under judicial custody from 24.05.2020 and he is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for bail to the petitioner.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written objection that the accused persons have involved in illicit preparation and possession of 5 litres of poisonous arrack and the accused person is having 66 previous cases of similar nature and the accused person has been arrested only on 24.05.2020 and it is too early to consider this application and the investigation is in premature stage and the earlier application for the present petitioner has been dismissed only on 16.06.2020 in

Crl.M.P. No.2060/2020 and there is no change in circumstances. Despite having plenty of alcohol rehabilitation centres, we were not able to achieve 100% results.

But this lockdown has proved to be the best rehabilitating mechanism to retrieve those people to lead a peaceful life. The present scenario had facilitated the people to recover by themselves, which in turn have brought happiness to thousands of families. But in this circumstance, adherence to such criminal activities are highly condemnable and must be curbed. Now that since such crimes have increased, the same must be curbed at the earlier point of time, in order to ensure the interest of the general public and also, there is possibility for further occurrence and he has serious objection to grant bail to the petitioner.

Considering the nature of the offences alleged to be committed by the petitioner/accused and also considering the judicial custody of the petitioner/Accused for the past 30 days and also considering the age of the petitioner/accused who is aged about 68 years, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

In the result, the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Padmanabhapuram within one month from today and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Padmanabhapuram. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kulasekharam Police Station. The Superintendent, District Jail, Nagercoil. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Thursday, the 25th day of June, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 2305/2020

Aravind S/o. Manikandan ..Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Rajakkamangalam Police Station, Crime Nos. 196/2019, 26/2020 and 36/2020 of Rajakkamangalam Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. .. Respondent

This petition is submitted by the accused through the Superintendent,

Central Jail, Palayamkottai praying to grant bail to him.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 379 IPC in crime

No.196/2019 and u/s 457 and 380 of IPC in crime Nos.26 and 36/2020.

The petitioner submitted that he is in judicial custody for more than 100 days and his family is in poor condition and he is the only bread winner of his family and since he is under judicial custody, his family is suffering from poverty and and prayed for bail to him.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written objection that as far as crime No.196/2019 is concerned, the accused person had involved in theft of 15 sovereigns of gold chain and as far as crime No.26/2019 is concerned, the accused person had involved in theft of 1 ¾ sovereigns of gold chain and as far as crime

No.36/2019 is concerned, the accused person had involved in theft of 7 sovereigns of gold chain and the accused person has been arrested only on 16.03.2020 andhe is having 15 previous cases of similar nature and he has serious objection to grant bail to the petitioner.

Considering the nature of the offences alleged to be committed by the petitioner/accused that he had involved in three theft cases of gold chains and also considering the objection of the learned Public Prosecutor that the petitioner is already having 15 previous cases of similar nature and considering the antecedents of the petitioner/accused, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence this petition is dismissed.

In the result, this petition is dismissed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Superintendent, Central Jail, Palayamkottai. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Thursday, the 25th day of June, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 2306/2020

V. Rolis S/o. Vargheese ..Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Colachel Police Station, Crime No. 108/2017 of Colachel Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. .. Respondent

This petition is submitted by the accused through the Superintendent,

Central Jail, Palayamkottai praying to grant bail to him on executing own bond.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

The petitioner submitted that he was arrested on 15.09.2019 and is in judicial custody and on 20.03.2020, he was granted bail with condition that the petitioner is enlarged on bail on executing two sureties. Now the petitioner is unable to produce sureties and his mother is also bedridden and due to spreading of Corona virus, he prayed for bail to him on executing own bond.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written objection that as and when the defacto complainant (Women) refused to give money to the accused person for consuming alcohol, the accused person had used foul language, threatened, pulled her hand, attempted to assault the defacto complainant using Aruval and had also assaulted her and the accused person is having 5 previous cases, considering the antecedents of the accused person, the police officials were constrained to maintain rowdy history sheet for him in H.S.No.291/2016. Considering the nature and gravity of the offence and the antecedents of the accused person, he has serious objection to grant bail to the petitioner.

Considering the contention of the petitioner that already on 20.03.2020, he was granted bail with condition to enlarge on bail on executing two sureties which were not challenged by the prosecution side and also considering fact that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 15.09.2019, this petition is allowed.

In the result, the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing an own bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- within one month from today and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/ S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. The Inspector of Police, Colachel Police Station. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Palayamkottai. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020. Crl.M.P. No.2307/2020

Merlin Jeba Kumar S/o. Nesamani (A2) : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Thuckalay Police Station, Crime No.553/2020 of Thuckalay Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru V.M. Jegadev, praying to extend the time to move regular bail. ORDER

Perused the petition filed through online and the written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

Offence alleged u/s 4(1-A) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act.

It is stated in the petition filed through online that the petitioner petitioner was granted interim bail as per order in Crl.M.P.No.1723/2020, dated

21.05.2020 with condition that the petitioner should move regular bail within a period of 30 days from the date of his release and due to pandemic of COVID-19, the petitioner is not able to regular bail within the stipulated time and prayed for extension of time.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written submission that it is mere application for extension of time and he has no serious objection.

Considering the reasons stated in the petition, this court is inclined to extend one month time and this court directs the petitioner to move regular bail within one month from today and accordingly this petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Padmanabhapuram. The Sub Inspector of Police,Thuckalay Police Station.

1. Thankaraj S/o. Chellaiyan (A1) 2. Sutha W/o John (A2) 3. Kamaladchi, W/o Thankaraj (A3) : Petitioners

/Vs./ Sub Inspector of Police, Puthukadai Police Station, Crime No. 62/2020 of Puthukadai Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru T. Praveen Kumar, praying to extend the time to appear before the court concerned.

ORDER Perused the petition filed through online and the written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

Offence alleged u/s 294(b), 323, 354 and 506(i) IPC.

The petitioners were granted anticipatory bail as per order in Crl.M.P.

Nos.1251/2020, dated 21.04.2020 with condition that the petitioners should appear before the court concerned within a period of 30 days from the date of order.

The learned counsel for the petitioners stated in the petition filed through online that due to COVID-19 lockdown, the petitioners are unable to appear before the court concerned within the stipulated time and prayed for extension of extension of time to appear.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written submission that it is mere application for extension of time and he has no serious objection.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kuzhithurai. The Sub Inspector of Police, Puthukadai Police Station. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday the 25th day of June, 2020. Crl.M.P. No.2312/2020

R. Arun S/o. Rasaiya : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Aralvaimozhi Police Station, Crime No. 40/2020 of Aralvaimozhi Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru J. Bergin Jebakumar, praying to extend the time to appear before the court concerned. ORDER Perused the petition filed through online and the written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

Offence alleged u/s 379 of IPC and Section 4(1)(1-A) and 21(1)of

MMDR Act.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition filed through online that the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail as per order in

Crl.M.P.No.1254/2020, dated 08.05.2020 with condition and due to national lockdown and COVID-19 pandemic situation, the petitioner could not able to appear before the court concerned within the stipulated time and prayed for extension of extension of time to appear.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written submission that it is mere application for extension of time and he has no serious objection.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25th day of June, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Judicial Magistrate, Boothapandy. The Sub Inspector of Police, Aralvaimozhi Police Station.