SURFACE WATER IMPACT NARRATIVE

IN SUPPORT OF:

COPRS NATIONWIDE PERMIT VERIFICATION REQUEST

AND

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATION

SUBMITTED FOR:

WESTSHORE MARINA DISTRICT - BRIDGE STREET PHASE 2 (F.K.A. NEW PORT TAMPA BAY)

APPLICANT:

BTI PARTNERS, LLC 401 EAST LAS OLAS BOULEVARD SUITE 1870 FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301

SUBMITTED BY:

KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY ONE MEMORIAL CENTER, SUITE 300 TAMPA, FL 33634

FILE: 10074-00-02

DECEMBER 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page

1.0 Introduction ...... 1

1.1 Past Permitting...... 1 1.2 Current Permit Application...... 2

2.0 Existing Site and Environmental Constraints ...... 2

2.1 Vegetative Communities ...... 2 2.2 Soils ...... 3 2.3 Listed Plant and Wildlife Surveys ...... 4 2.4 Listed Species Discussions ...... 4 2.5 Listed Species Conclusions ...... 6

3.0 Water Quality ...... 6

4.0 Existing Onsite Wetland Habitat Quality ...... 6

4.1 Jurisdictional Wetlands ...... 7 4.2 Project Planning and Site Entitlements ...... 7 4.3 Permanent Surface Water Impact Descriptions ...... 8 4.4 Temporary Surface Water Impact Description ...... 9

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This document is submitted by King Engineering Associates, Inc. (King) on behalf of BTI Partners, LLC (hereinafter referred to as “Applicant”) in support of their application for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Nationwide Permit Verification, and a Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) State-Wide Environmental Resource Permit (ERP). The proposed project is known as the Westshore Marina District, Bridge Street Phase 2 project (F.K.A. New Port Tampa Bay) and is a stand-alone construction project. The project area is located on a 25.85-acre parcel north of West Tyson Avenue, east of South Westshore Boulevard and south of Bridge Street within Section 8, Township 30 South, Range 18 East, Hillsborough County, Florida. The approximate center point of the project site is located at 27.890169° North and 82.529878° West. A vicinity map depicting the location of the subject site is included as Attachment 1 of this narrative.

The overall Westshore Marina District property, inclusive of the Phase 2 portion that is the subject of this permit application, was developed in the past for industrial businesses and land uses. The overall property appears to have been developed some time after the 1938 series of aerial photography, and most likely during the 1940’s to early 1950’s when much of South Tampa was cleared, filled and developed. Past land uses on the Phase 2 portion of the property include Hendry Dredging and Skanska Construction, among others.

1.1 Past Permitting

In 2006, approvals were also obtained from the Corps and District for what was considered Phase 2 of the marina development, and included the removal of 3,277 feet of deteriorating bulkhead, with the replacement of 1,492 feet of sheet pile bulkhead and 1,445 feet of riprap rubble revetment, and the filling of 1.25 acres of existing boat slips along with the excavation of 1,783 cubic yards of material adjacent to the boat slips. For the seawall replacement activities, Corps approval No. SAJ-2005-8444 (IP-CJW) and District ERP No. 43029777.003 were obtained. There were no previous permits that were obtained for construction activities within the upland portions of the Phase 2 project area.

In consideration that the Hendry and Moody Basin where the seawall removal/replacement was proposed was considered an artificial waterway, the District ERP approval referenced that the impacts were considered de minimis and no wetland impact compensation was required. The issued ERP also referenced that no Sovereign State Lands approval was required for the proposed seawall removal/replacement. The Corps approval did not require any wetland impact compensation for the authorized activities.

The Corps approval expired September 18, 2012. At this time, the current property owner does not intend to request from the Corps a reauthorization of the seawall replacement approval. At some point in the future, an entity may come forward that requests the Corps to re-permit the seawall replacement portion of the development, with the most likely scenario being that a future purchaser of the areas fronting the ageing seawall areas may request a new permit approval specifically for the seawall replacement activity. It has been reported that the Corps has delegated permitting authority for minor projects such as seawall replacements, in Hillsborough County, to the Hillsborough County Environmental Protection Commission (EPC) pursuant to an issued State Programmatic General Permit (SPGP).

1 G:\ENV_SCI\Projects\10074\00\01\NWP Application\Surface Water Impact Narrative.mdp.doc 1.2 Current Permit Application

Being that the current property owner does not intend to seek a reauthorization of the seawall replacement from the Corps, the Applicant/Owner considers this current request for Nationwide Permit verification to fill and reroute an upland drainage ditch to be of completely separate utility from the previous permit approval. The original permit for the bulkhead repair/replacement did not include the upland/interior portions of the Phase 2 development area, and other than the outfall required for the rerouted drainage ditch, the current proposal does not propose any work within the estuarine portions of the ownership. In addition, the upland development of the Phase 2 ownership is completely independent of the replacement of the seawall bulkheads.

Under the current permit application, the project will include developing the site to include the following:

• Construction of South Bridge Street, from the roundabout permitted under the Phase 1 project south to West Tyson Avenue,

• The extension of below ground utilities associated with the roadway construction,

• Demolition of existing buildings associated with the former industrial use of the property,

• The construction of a new stormwater treatment facility that is sized to treat the runoff from the proposed roadway construction area,

• The construction of a 10-foot by 5-foot box culvert system that will bypass an existing drainage ditch and outfall to the Hendry and Moody Basin (Rattlesnake Creek) to the west,

• The filling of an existing drainage ditch.

2.0 EXISTING SITE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS

The environmental characteristics of the project site are very similar to those that characterize this general area within the City of Tampa. The project site was developed in the past, and include upland and surface water cover types. Land use types described herein are classified according to the “Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System” (FDOT, 1999) (FLUCFCS) and are grouped by property. Attachment 2 of this narrative provides a map of the existing onsite land uses pursuant to FLUCFCS nomenclature.

2.1 Vegetative Communities

In the southwest quadrant of the site occurs and area that has been classified as Industrial (FLUCFCS Code 1500). Pursuant to the FLUCFCS publication, the Industrial land use category includes areas where the manufacturing, assembly or processing of materials and products are accomplished. On the Westshore Marina District site, this land use has been mapped within a portion of the property that was associated with a former Skanska equipment storage area. The metal building that was associated with this former use is still present onsite. This land use area is vegetated with bahiagrass, cabbage palm, and sedge species.

2 G:\ENV_SCI\Projects\10074\00\01\NWP Application\Surface Water Impact Narrative.mdp.doc Much of the project area has been classified as the Open Land (FLUCFCS Code 1900) cover type. Evidence of historic industrial activities, including furrows, spoil areas and debris, are present within this area. The vegetation that is present within this land use type is dominated by bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), with lesser occurrence of cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), sicklepod (Sesbania sp.), torpedograss (Panicum repens), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), beggarticks (Bidens alba) and sedges (Cyperus sp.). Two small areas on the west side of property along the existing seawall were observed to be vegetated with mangrove species such as white mangroves (Laguncularia racemosa) and black mangroves (Avicennia germinans). The mangrove areas occur where short sections of the seawall were not installed and appear to be haul-out or ramp areas associated with the former marine construction business and industrial use of the site.

The Districts mapping of onsite land use types did not separately identify Streams and Waterways (FLUCFCS Code 5100) on the subject site. This generic classification can be applied to ditches and drainage channels as well as natural stream courses. On the Westshore Marina District Phase 2 property, an existing drainage ditch conveys water from an offsite channel, through the property, and outfalls to existing culverts beneath West Tyson Avenue. The vegetation along the lower side slope and bottom includes water hyssop (Bacopa monnieri), torpedograss (Panicum repens) and cattails (Typha spp.).

An area classified as Reservoirs (FLUCFCS Code 5300) has also been mapped on the subject property. In this case, the mapped area is associated with what appears to be a portion of the previous stormwater treatment pond configuration that was partially constructed by the previous land owner. It is surmised that the previous owners required some fill material for a portion of the permitted Phase 1 upland construction activities, and therefore, borrowed the fill from the location of the future stormwater pond. The vegetation within the Reservoirs land use is similar to the streams and waterways land use described above, with cattails and torpedograss co- dominating this area.

2.2 Soils

Attachment 3 of this narrative provides an exhibit of the soil types as classified by the US Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service). The soils mapping was obtained from the District as a GIS Arc Info data file and subsequently overlain with a depiction of the property boundary to complete the soils graphic. Based on the GIS soils data obtained from the District, and the SCS publication “Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida”, two (2) soil types have been mapped on the Project Site.

045 – St. Augustine - Urban Land Complex 058 – Wabasso - Urban Land Complex

No hydric soil areas, as based on the Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, March 2000, have been mapped onsite.

The attached exhibit indicates that the soils within the property, as well as the remainder of the Port Rattlesnake peninsula and the Gandy Bridge eastern approach and abutments, are all considered some form of “Made Land”. Hand shovel test pit excavations conducted on the property confirm the soils classification made by the SCS, with tan colored sandy material with scattered gravel and small stone fragment material present below the soil surface. It is anticipated that the property was filled some time during the period of the mid-1940’s through mid-1950’s, when much of the South Tampa area was developed.

3 G:\ENV_SCI\Projects\10074\00\01\NWP Application\Surface Water Impact Narrative.mdp.doc 2.3 Listed Plant and Wildlife Surveys

King Ecologists conducted an assessment of the property on August 15, 2016, in order to document current site conditions, and determine the presence, or potential presence of protected wildlife and plant species as listed in “Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern”, Official Lists, Updated January 2016 edition, published by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). King maintains a master spreadsheet that references vegetative cover and habitat types by county, along with the specific listed species that could be expected to occur in such cover types based on the known range of individual listed species within the state. Initially, this spreadsheet was reviewed to develop a roster of listed species that may be present on the site. In addition, pertinent literature sources were reviewed for those listed species that may be present, including specific automated searches of the following existing databases:

• FWC website Waterbird Colony Locator records to determine if that agency has documented any Waterbird breeding colonies on or in the vicinity of the subject area.

• FWC website Bald Eagle Nest Location Data Records (2012-2013) to determine if that agency has documented any Bald Eagle nests on or in the vicinity of the subject area.

• FWC 2006 Wildlife Observation Records Databases.

• 1999 Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) Element Occurrence Records.

Prior to the field review, existing land use and habitat shape files were queried from the GIS data layers available from the District, and these data were digitally combined with current digital aerial photography products and site boundary shape files obtained from the Hillsborough County Property Appraisers Office to create mapping products to be used for field annotation.

Field reconnaissance of the project area was accomplished via meandering pedestrian transects through representative onsite habitats. Special attention was given to detecting the presence of listed species, which included frequent stops to assess the surrounding area for signs (i.e., tracks, nests, vocalizations) of listed species. Any listed species observations made within the Project area are referenced in bold type within this narrative for easy identification.

2.4 Listed Species Discussions

A list of the conspicuous vertebrate fauna observed during King's field assessment is referenced below. Wildlife species observed included: Wood Stork (foraging offsite), Osprey (perched offsite), Black Vulture, Mockingbird, and small mammal burrows. No listed species were observed onsite during the field reconnaissance effort.

Listed Species Data Searches King accessed the FWC website Bald Eagle Nest Location Data and automated records to determine if that agency has documented any Bald Eagle nests on or in the vicinity of the project area. This search revealed that there were no Bald Eagle nests on the property or within a 1-mile radius of the property. Similar searches of the FWC Waterbird Colony locator and database also revealed that there are no waterbird colonies on or within 1-mile of the project site.

4 G:\ENV_SCI\Projects\10074\00\01\NWP Application\Surface Water Impact Narrative.mdp.doc The searches of the FWC 2006 Wildlife Observation Records Databases and 1999 FNAI Element Occurrence Records revealed limited listed species observations within a one (1) mile radius of the Westshore Marina District Phase 2 project area. Discussions regarding the results of those data searches are provided below.

Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) - Threatened No Wood Stork were observed onsite, however, the project is located within a Wood Stork Core Foraging Area (CFA), which consists of a 15-mile radius from a known Wood Stork breeding colony. There are sufficient breeding colonies within Hillsborough County that the most portions of the county are overlapped by one or more 15-mile radii CFA boundaries. During the federal Section 404 dredge and fill permitting process, it is understood that the Corps will make a determination of the potential impact of the project to the Wood Stork, and may seek concurrence from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as to their site specific determination. The onsite drainage ditch could provide suitable foraging habitat for this species during periods of very low rainfall. Based on that observation, the Applicant has provided the attached Affect Determination Key for the Wood Stork. By progressing through the couplets of the Key, the Applicant has arrived at a determination that the project is unlikely to affect this species, primarily due to the fact that impacts to the drainage ditch total less than 0.5 acres. It is anticipated that no coordination should be necessary with the USFWS with regard to this species.

Listed Shorebirds: American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) – State Species of Special Concern Least Tern (Sterna antillarum) – State Threatened As depicted on Figure 3, observations of the Least Tern and American Oystercatcher have been made in the past within one mile of the subject parcels, with that information having been obtained from the 2006 FWC Wildlife Observation data layers. Based on the locations of these observations, it is likely that these shorebird species were observed foraging within natural habitat areas that are located near the undeveloped shorelines of the DeBartolo property to the north of the project (former Georgetown Apartments property). These two species could be expected to forage along shallow beaches and tidal flats along the shores of Tampa Bay, and this type of shoreline generally does not exist along the project area. Additionally, these species typically nest along sandy, or mixed sand and pebble or shell or beaches, dunes or spoil or marsh islands. No such habitat areas occur on the Westshore Marina District Phase 2 property. With a general lack of what would be considered suitable foraging and nesting habitat areas onsite, it is concluded that the past observance of these two listed species within one mile of the site should have no negative impact on the implementation of the proposed project. In the unlikely event that Least Tern or American Oystercatcher nests were discovered onsite prior to construction, it may be necessary to avoid clearing and construction within the those locations until it can be documented that the nesting process has been completed. Under this unlikely scenario, it may also be required to obtain nest removal permits in order to disturb or clear the nest sites after the nesting process has been documented to have been completed and the young birds have fledged.

West Indian Manatee (Trichechus manatus) – Federally Threatened As depicted on Attachment 4, there have been numerous West Indian Manatee sightings made based on the compilation of the 1997 and 2006 FWC occurrence records. While the locations associated with the manatee sightings are typically general in nature, it appears that a few were made in close proximity to the Phase 2 project area. Given the number of shallow tidal areas that support seagrass beds within Tampa Bay outside of the Port Rattlesnake area, it is not surprising that there have been numerous past sightings of manatees in the general area.

5 G:\ENV_SCI\Projects\10074\00\01\NWP Application\Surface Water Impact Narrative.mdp.doc During the past Federal Dredge and Fill permitting process associated with the bulkhead removal/replacement project, the Corps determined that the seawall reconstruction project “may affect, not likely to adversely affect” (MANLAA) the West Indian Manatee based on the Applicant agreeing to comply with the “Standard Manatee Conditions for In-Water Work”. The current permit application seeks an approval to fill an upland cut ditch within the interior portions of the property, as well as to construct an outfall structure for the relocated and culverted drainage way. Clearly, manatee have no access to the internal, upland cut ditch, therefore this portion of the proposed activities would have no effect on this species. However, the breaching of the existing seawall for the construction of the proposed outfall structure would technically qualify as marine construction that could potentially affect manatees. It is anticipated that based on the temporary, and minor nature of the proposed work in the tidal areas, the Corps would again conclude a MANLAA affect determination for the species assuming that the Permittee would agree to the signage, etc. associated with the Standard Manatee Conditions. As such, the nearby presence of this species should pose no impediment to the implementation of the project.

2.5 Listed Species Conclusions

Based on the results of the preliminary listed species assessment, it does not appear that additional listed species studies and permitting will be required. The nearby presence of the West Indian Manatee is anticipated to carry special conditions of the Corps approval for specific in-water work precautions regarding manatees.

The historical clearing and filling of the site and the past industrial marine land uses on the property, along with the site proximity to major roadways (West Gandy Boulevard), are factors that have likely served to limit the potential for onsite occurrence of listed (and non-listed) wildlife species on both properties. While the need for future agency coordination measures have been identified, it does not appear that these issues should serve as an impediment to the redevelopment of the site.

3.0 WATER QUALITY

Currently, some water quality functions are being provided by the contiguous wetlands and other surface water areas within the Project site. Post-development water quality will be maintained as permitted and conditioned by the FDEP ERP. The project will utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as needed, and may include the construction of swales, erosion and/or sediment control structures, turbidity barriers, or other devices that will help to prevent sediment transport. Consequently, the project will comply with the state’s water quality design criteria and therefore, provide reasonable assurance that there will be no adverse impacts to water quality.

4.0 EXISTING ONSITE WETLAND HABITAT QUALITY

Based on the site development plan submitted for review by the Applicant, the following impacts to jurisdictional areas are proposed:

 0.44 acres of permanent impact to a man-made upland cut surface water drainage ditch,

6 G:\ENV_SCI\Projects\10074\00\01\NWP Application\Surface Water Impact Narrative.mdp.doc  0.01 acres of temporary impact to the man-made Hendry and Moody tidal basin for the construction of a drainage outfall through the existing vertical bulkhead.

Several existing factors influence wetland and surface water conditions within the overall project area, not the least of which is the developed nature of this portion of the South Tampa area and the recent industrial land uses that were occupying the property. The developed and disturbed nature of the Project site has been considered in developing overall strategies for the re- development of the property with consideration of existing surface water conditions. The effects of the historic site development, including the placement of several feet of fill on the surface of the property, has reduced the area and quality of habitat for wetland dependent wildlife.

4.1 Jurisdictional Wetlands

In July 2016, King submitted a request to the Corps for a Jurisdictional Determination of the existing surface water drainage ditch. On September 21, 2016, Corps staff conducted a review of the limits of the existing drainage ditch relative to other nearby Waters of the U.S., as well as the adjacent (partially excavated) stormwater pond. Subsequently, the Corps indicated via a September 26, 2016 email message a determination that the drainage ditch in question would fall under federal permitting jurisdiction, however, the existing partially constructed stormwater pond would not. Based on this preliminary determination, the limits of the drainage ditch are shown on the attached Construction Plans and have been referenced with hatching to indicate the removal of the drainage way.

As part of the City of Tampa permitting process, Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County (EPC) staff reviewed the site conditions and historical aerial photography, and indicated in a November 21, 2016 letter the conclusion that the drainage ditch and partially completed stormwater pond were upland cut. The EPC letter want on to indicate that, based on the original nature of the two surface water areas, they would qualify for a Noticed Exemption under Chapter 1.11.11(1)(b) of the EPC’s rules. Being that the EPC would typically conducted their wetland and surface water review pursuant to Rule 62-340 F.A.C., the Applicant concludes that the upland cut determination made by EPC staff is suitable for use in obtaining a state ERP approval.

The wetland and surface water limits were horizontally located, and those surveyed limits are depicted on the project Construction Plans. It is presumed that the District may also conduct some sort of a site review as a part of the ERP application process.

4.2 Project Planning and Site Entitlements

The attached “Westshore Marina District Phase 2 Concept Plan” (Attachment 5) depicts the full build-out of the upland portions of the overall property. The concept plan is reflective of the site entitlements that have been approved by the City of Tampa, including the following:

• 911 residential units (split between townhome and apartment dwellings), • Two (2) clubhouses, • 35,000 square feet of retail/restaurant space, • 143,700 square feet of professional office space, • The number of parking spaces appropriate to the uses listed above.

7 G:\ENV_SCI\Projects\10074\00\01\NWP Application\Surface Water Impact Narrative.mdp.doc The current construction phase involves the construction of roadway, stormwater treatment for roadway impervious surfaces and utilities infrastructure construction. It is anticipated that following the construction of Bridge Street Extension and internal site grading, the development parcels will be sold to outside developers and vertical construction would be completed by those future entities. There is a great deal of interest in the Westshore Marina District Phase 2 site, and it is anticipated that the proposed roadway and utilities construction will further increase the interest in the property, and therefore, sale of the internal parcels.

Without the ability to completely fill the upland cut surface water drainage ditch, and reroute the site drainage as is proposed in the current permit application, it would not be possible for the Applicant to realize the approved entitlements for the site. Based on the full, and eventual build- out of the property, the Applicant proposes the following impacts to onsite surface water areas.

4.3 Permanent Surface Water Impact Descriptions

Surface Water Ditch “B” (0.44 Acres) As indicated in Section 2.1 of this narrative, the vegetation along the lower side slope and bottom of the existing drainage ditch includes water hyssop, torpedograss and scattered stands of cattails. The vegetation along the upper banks of the drainage ditch is reflective of the disturbed nature of the onsite uplands, with bahiagrass, sicklepod, torpedograss, dogfennel, beggarticks, and sedges present in those locations.

This surface water impact is proposed to allow the construction of stormwater treatment pond BB-1, construction of the 10 by 5 foot box culvert drainage bypass system, and general grading for the future development of the remaining uplands onsite. Without this impact, the Applicant would not be able to realize the sale of development parcels resulting in the full development potential of the project, inclusive of the approved residential, commercial and professional office entitlements and land uses. The flows that are associated with the drainage ditch will be routed through the 10 by 5 foot concrete box culvert system that is also proposed for construction with this development phase. In order to maintain drainage flows from offsite areas to the east of the project site, the onsite drainage ditch will not be filled until the concrete box culvert system has been installed and is fully operational.

As indicated above in Section 4.1 of this narrative, it has been determined that the drainage ditch was excavated in upland areas. Additionally, Corps review staff indicated in their September 26, 2016 email message that compensation would not be required for impacts to the drainage ditch, and that is impacts could be kept below the 0.5 acre threshold, the project could be verified under one of the existing Corps Nationwide Permits. Based on permitting agency input, no specific compensation is proposed for the filling and rerouting of the drainage ditch. The drainage routing functions associated with the existing ditch will be replaced by the proposed culvert system.

Existing Pond Surface Water Impact Area (0.75 acres) As indicated in Section 2.1 of this narrative, the existing pond is in the location of a previously proposed stormwater treatment pond based on the former site plan. The pond was apparently constructed by the previous land owner, and presumably excavated to provide a fill source for the previous Phase 1 upland construction activities. The vegetation within the Reservoirs land use is similar to the streams and waterways land use described above, with cattails and torpedograss co-dominating this area.

8 G:\ENV_SCI\Projects\10074\00\01\NWP Application\Surface Water Impact Narrative.mdp.doc Similar to the Ditch “B” impact description provided above, it has been determined that the drainage ditch was excavated in upland areas. Additionally, Corps review staff indicated in their September 26, 2016 email message that the existing pond is isolated, and therefore, not jurisdictional for federal Section 404 permitting. Being that the upland cut pond is less than one (1) acre in size, under District rules there should be no compensation required for impacts to the pond. Given this fact, along with the isolated/non-jurisdictional determination made by Corps staff, no specific compensation is proposed for the filling and modification of the existing pond.

4.4 Temporary Surface Water Impact Description

Rattlesnake Channel Surface Water Impact Area (0.01 Acres) Under the previous bulkhead replacement permitting by the Corps and District, the Rattlesnake Channel (Hendry and Moody Basin) on the west side of the Phase 2 project area was considered a man-made tidal basin, and no specific compensation was required for the replacement of the seawall. Under the current permit application, an outfall location that will breach the existing seawall is proposed for the 10 by 5 foot concrete box culvert system. The location of the proposed outfall is shown on Sheet C2.50 of the attached Construction Plans. In this location, FDOT floating Type II sediment barrier will be installed around the proposed work area. The temporary impact is associated with the construction access that is required to breach the seawall and install the outfall structure and manatee exclusion bars. No fill or end treatment is proposed to project waterward of the face of the existing seawall. The design associated with the 10 by 5 foot concrete box culvert outfall treatment is provided on Sheets S5.01 through S5.06 of the attached Construction Plans. Given the man-made origin of the surface water area, and the temporary nature of the proposed impact, no specific compensation is provided for the construction of the outfall treatment.

9 G:\ENV_SCI\Projects\10074\00\01\NWP Application\Surface Water Impact Narrative.mdp.doc ATTACHMENT 1

U.S.G.S. QUAD MAP

G:\ENV_SCI\Projects\10074\00\01\NWP Application\Surface Water Impact Narrative.mdp.doc Westshore Marina District USGS Quad Map

- LEGEND - Phase 2

Project Area

d

x

m

.

p

a

M

_

d

a

u

Q

_

t

r

o

p

w e

5 N

1 \

0 S

2 I

-

2

G \

0

: 1

E

0 \

T 0

A 0

D \

L 4

A 7

I 0

R 0

E Miami, Florida - 305.807.6068 1

A \

s

t

Sarasota, Florida - 941.358.6500 c

6 e

1 j

0 o Tampa, Florida - 813.880.8881

2 r

/

6

P SCALE - FEET \

2

/

I Austin, Texas - 512.462.4921

7

C

: S

E www.kingengineering.com _

T

A V

D 0 500 1,000 Hillsborough County

N

E E

L \

I :

F

G G R A P H I C R E P R E S E N T A T I O N S A R E G E N E R A L I N N A T U R E A N D S H O U L D B E U S E D F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N L Y ATTACHMENT 2

AERIAL PHOTO W/ FLUCFCS CLASSIFICATIONS

G:\ENV_SCI\Projects\10074\00\01\NWP Application\Surface Water Impact Narrative.mdp.doc We18s00tshore Marina District Pha13s00e 2 FLUCFCS Map

5400

1300

5400

1400

1300

5300

5400 1900

5300 1300

1300 1500 - LEGEND - 2011 SWFWMD FLUCFCS 6120 5300 5300

Project Area

d

x

m .

S FLUCFCS Descriptions:

C

U L

F 1500 - Industrial

_

l

l

a r

e 1900 - Open Land

v

O

_ t

r 5300 - Reservoirs

o

p w e 5400

5 N

1 \

0 S

2 I

-

2

G 5300 \ 0 5300

: 1

E

0 \

T 0

A 0

D \ 1300

L 4

A 7

I 0

R 0

E Miami, Florida - 305.807.6068 1

A \

s

t

Sarasota, Florida - 941.358.6500 c

6 e

1 j

0 o Tampa, Florida - 813.880.8881

2 r

/

8 P

/ SCALE - FEET \

2

I Austin, Texas - 512.462.4921

1

C

: S

E www.kingengineering.com Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics, _

T

A V

D 0 150 300 Hillsborough County

N CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP,

E E

L \

I :

F swisstopo, and the GIS User Community G G R A P H I C R E P R E S E N T A T I O N S A R E G E N E R A L I N N A T U R E A1N3D0 S0H O U L D B E U S E D F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N L Y ATTACHMENT 3 SCS SOILS MAP

G:\ENV_SCI\Projects\10074\00\01\NWP Application\Surface Water Impact Narrative.mdp.doc 058 Westshore Marina District Soils Map

099

099

045

- LEGEND - Phase 2 Project Area 058 SCS Soils Data Soils Descriptions:

d 045 - St. Augustine

x

m

. s

l Urban Land Complex i

o

s

_ l

l 058 - Wabasso

a

r e

v Urban Land Complex

O

_

t

r

o

p

w e

5 N

1 \

0 S

2 I

-

2

G \

0

: 1

E

0 100 \

T 0

A 0

D \

L 4

A 7

I 0

R 0

E Miami, Florida - 305.807.6068 1

A \

s

t

Sarasota, Florida - 941.358.6500 c

6 e

1 j

0 o Tampa, Florida - 813.880.8881

2 r

/

5

P SCALE - FEET \

2

/

I Austin, Texas - 512.462.4921

7

C

: S

E www.kingengineering.com Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics, _

T

A V

D 0 150 300 Hillsborough County

N CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP,

E E

L \

I :

F swisstopo, and the GIS User Community

G G R A P H I C R E P R E S E N T A T I O N S A R E G E N E R A L I N N A T U R E A N D S H O U L D B E U S E D F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N L Y

ATTACHMENT 4 WESTSHORE MARINA DISTRICT PHASE 2 CONCEPT PLAN

G:\ENV_SCI\Projects\10074\00\01\NWP Application\Surface Water Impact Narrative.mdp.doc PHASE 2 LIMITS Q:\CIVIL\10074\00\02\Production\Drawings\Concept-Exhibit\EXH-OSP.dwg

WESTSHORE MARINA DISTRICT PHASE 2 CONCEPT PLAN 0 200 400

SCALE: FEET