Arxiv:1906.01462V1 [Quant-Ph] 4 Jun 2019 Circuits [17–20]

Home , Quantum geometry

Experimental Measurement of the Quantum Metric Tensor and Related Topological Phase Transition with a Superconducting Qubit

Xinsheng Tan,1, ∗ Dan-Wei Zhang,2, † Zhen Yang,1 Ji Chu,1 Yan-Qing Zhu,1 Danyu Li,1 Xiaopei Yang,1 Shuqing Song,1 Zhikun Han,1 Zhiyuan Li,1 Yuqian Dong,1 Hai-Feng Yu,1 Hui Yan,3 Shi-Liang Zhu,1, 2, ‡ and Yang Yu1, § 1National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, School of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China 2Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Engineering and Quantum Materials, GPETR Center for Quantum Precision Measurement and SPTE, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China 3Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Engineering and Quantum Materials, School of Physics and Telecommunication Engineering, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China Berry curvature is an imaginary component of the quantum geometric tensor (QGT) and is well studied in many branches of modern physics; however, the quantum metric as a real component of the QGT is less explored. Here, by using tunable superconducting circuits, we experimentally demonstrate two methods to directly measure the quantum metric tensor for characterizing the geometry and topology of underlying quantum states in parameter space. The ﬁrst method is to probe the transition probability after a sudden quench, and the second one is to detect the excitation rate under weak periodic driving. Furthermore, based on quantum-metric and Berry-curvature measurements, we explore a topological phase transition in a simulated time-reversal-symmetric system, which is characterized by the Euler characteristic number instead of the Chern number. The work opens up a unique approach to explore the topology of quantum states with the QGT.

Introduction.– Geometry is one of the most intrigu- but its direct experimental measurement remains elusive. ing concepts for understanding diverse fundamental phe- Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, a topological nomena in modern physics, ranging from general rela- phase transition characterized by the ECN [24], which tivity and gauge theory to quantum mechanics. The can be obtained from the quantum-metric measurements, geometry of quantum states in Hilbert space can be is still lacking in experiments. described by the so-called quantum geometric tensor In this Letter, we experimentally demonstrate two dif- (QGT) [1–3], whose real and imaginary components de- ferent methods to directly measure the QGT in param- fine the quantum metric (or Fubini-Study metric) and the eter space using tunable superconducting circuits. The Berry curvature, respectively. The Berry curvature has first method is to probe the transition probability af- been explored in various topics including the celebrated ter a sudden quench of the system parameters, which is Aharonov-Bohm effect [4], Berry phase effect [3,5], and associated with the wave-function overlap. The second the more recent topological quantum matter [6–9]. For method is to detect the excitation rate under weak pe- instance, the integral of the Berry curvature over a closed riodic driving on a quantum state, as proposed in Ref. two-dimensional manifold defines the first Chern num- [32]. Furthermore, based on quantum-metric and Berry- ber [10], which is a topological invariant to characterize curvature measurements, we explore a phase transition quantized Hall conductivity and Chern insulators [11]. in a simulated time-reversal-symmetric (TRS) system, Recently, the Berry curvature has been directly measured which is characterized by the ECN instead of the (van- in some engineered systems, such as cold atoms [9, 12– ishing) Chern number. Our work thus provides generic 15], photonic lattices [16], and superconducting quantum and versatile tools to reveal the geometry and topology

arXiv:1906.01462v1 [quant-ph] 4 Jun 2019 circuits [17–20]. of quantum states. Quantum metric and measurement schemes.– We con- Compared to the well-studied Berry curvature, the sider a generic (non-degenerate) quantum state |uλi in quantum metric is less explored, both theoretically and a parameter space spanned by N dimensionless parame- experimentally. The quantum metric is an intrinsic geo- ters λ = (λ1, λ2, ··· , λN ). The so-called QGT associated metric concept that reﬂects the distance between neigh- with |uλi is deﬁned as [1] bouring quantum states in parameter space and is as-

sociated with a different topological invariant, the Euler Qµν = h∂λµ uλ|(1 − |uλihuλ|)|∂λν uλi = gµν + iFµν /2, characteristic number (ECN), for describing the topol- (1) ogy of the state manifold [21–25]. Recently, it was shown which can take complex values. Its real component de- that the quantum metric is closely related to the quan- fines the quantum metric gµν = Re[Qµν ] = gνµ, which is tum phase transition [26], superfluidity in flat bands [27], symmetric. The imaginary component is related to the and topological matter [28–30]. Several schemes have Berry curvature Fµν = 2Im[Qµν ] = −Fνµ, which is an- been proposed to extract the quantum metric [25, 31–36], tisymmetric. The quantum metric defines a distance be- 2 √ (a) (b) tensor: Fθφ = 2 det g. If the closed manifold is a torus M = T 2 without monopoles, one has χ = 0, as shown in Fig.1(c). Different from the first Chern number which should =2 2 uλ+dλ S vanish in a system in the presence of TRS, the ECN χ ds2 (c) can be nontrivial under this condition. Below we will u λ show that this index can characterize a topological phase Parameter space transition in a simulated TRS system: χ rapidly jumps with respect to an external parameter, while the Chern =0 T 2 number is always zero and thus not an appropriate topological index. Figure 1: (Color online) (a) Illustration of distance between The distance ds2 in Eq. (2) actually gives the tran- two nearby quantum states in parameter space. The topology sition probability P + = ds2 of the quantum state being of a closed manifold can be characterized by the ECN χ in excited to other eigenstates during a sudden quench of Eq. (4): (b) χ = 2 for a sphere S2; and (c) χ = 0 for a torus the parameter from λ to λ + δλ [1, 29], as shown in T 2. Fig.1(a). This observation provides a generic and direct approach to measure the quantum metric tensor via tween nearby states |uλi and |uλ+dλi in parameter space the transition probability in the sudden approximation. [2, 37] We initially prepare the system at λ = λ0 to detect the quantum metric at that point. To extract the diagonal 2 2 X ds = 1 − |huλ|uλ+dλi| = gµν dλµdλν , (2) components gµµ, we suddenly quench the system param- µν eter to λ0+δλeµ along the eµ direction and then measure + 2 3 which is related to the wave-function overlap, as shown in the transition probability Pµµ = gµµδλ +O(δλ ). To ex- Fig.1(a). The quantum metric and the Berry curvature tract the off-diagonal components gµν (µ 6= ν), we apply are gauge-invariant and describe the complete geometry a sudden quench to λ0 +δλeµ +δλeν along the eµ +eν di- + of the quantum state manifold. rection and then measure the probability Pµν , which has 2 + + + 2 3 We take a two-level system in a Bloch sphere S (two- the relation Pµν −Pµµ−Pνν = 2gµν δλ +O(δλ ). Another dimensional Hilbert space) as an example to illustrate the scheme we used to extract the components of the quan- basic ideas of the QGT. The system Hamiltonian can be tum metric is via the excitation rate of a quantum state parameterized as upon applying proper time-periodic modulations [32, 37]. Experimental system.– We realize a highly tunable two- −iφ Ω cos θ sin θe level Hamiltonian with superconducting quantum cir- H1(θ, φ) = iφ , (3) 2 sin θe − cos θ cuits and measure the quantum metric using the two different methods. The circuits consist of a superconduct- where the two angles {θ, φ} represent the parameters λ. ing transmon qubit embedded in a three-dimensional alu- For both the ground state |u i = (sin θ , − cos θ eiφ)Tr − 2 2 minium (Al) cavity [19, 20, 38–41]. The transmon qubit and the excited state |u i = (cos θ , sin θ eiφ)Tr with Tr + 2 2 is composed of an Al single Josephson junction and two denoting the transpose of a matrix, the quantum metric 2 pads (250 µm × 500 µm) fabricated on a 500 µm thick is given by gθθ = 1/4, gφφ = sin θ/4, and gθφ = 0. silicon substrate. The thicknesses of the two Al films However, the Berry curvature for |u±i is the opposite: of the junction are 30nm and 80nm, respectively. The F ± = ± 1 sin θ. By viewing the Berry connection as the θφ 2 cavity in our experiments is mainly used to conveniently vector potential, one simulates a Dirac monopole at the control and readout the transmon qubit. The resonance center of the Bloch sphere [cf. Fig.1(b)], which has frequency of the cavity TE101 mode is 9.053 GHz. The a topological charge in terms of the first Chern number whole sample package is cooled in a dilution refrigerator C = 1 R F ± dθdφ = ±1. The topology of the two- ± 2π S2 θφ to a base temperature of 10 mK. The experimental setups dimensional manifold M can also be characterized by for the qubit control and measurement are well estab- another topological invariant related to the metric tensor, lished [19, 20, 38–41]. The coupled transmon qubit and i.e., the ECN [24, 25] cavity exhibit anharmonic multiple energy levels. In our 1 Z p experiments, we use the lowest two energy levels |0i and χ = R det g dµdν, (4) |1i, which are coupled with the microwave fields. The 4π M transition frequency between them is ω10/2π = 7.172 where R is the Ricci scalar curvature and g denotes the GHz, which is independently determined by saturation 2×2 metric tensor. For M = S2 with {µ, ν} = {θ, φ} and spectroscopies. The energy relaxation time of the qubit is ∗ R = 8, χ = 2 for both |u±i. Here χ = 2|C±| due to an T1 ∼7 µs, and the dephasing time is T2 ∼6 µs. We apply intrinsic relation between the Berry curvature associated the microwave driving along x, y, and z directions and with the monopole and the determinant of the metric realize the effective Hamiltonian in the rotating frame 3

(let ~ = 1) and eη = {eθ, eφ, eθ +eφ} for the three protocols, respectively. This means that only θ or φ is ramping linearly in 1 Hexp = (Ωxσx + Ωyσy + Ωzσz), (5) (a)  2 z    where σx,y,z are the three Pauli matrices. Here Ωx (Ωy)  is the Rabi frequency along the x (y) axis on the Bloch  y sphere, which can be controlled by tuning the ampli-  tude and phase of the microwave applied to the system, x (b) nt(,) Ωz = ω10 − ωm is determined by the detuning between + (c) 0 1 g the system energy level spacing ω10 and the microwave Experiment Simulation frequency ωm. The parameters Ωx,y,z are calibrated by

Ω g

using Rabi oscillations and Ramsey fringes in our exper- / ω

iments [37]. g Quantum metric Quantum

(a) z t (ns) t (ns)      Figure 3: (Color online) Measuring the quantum metric from  y excitation rate under periodic weak drive for the ground state |u−i. (a) Three drive protocols for extracting gθθ, gφφ, and x gθφ (from left to right). (b) Measured and simulated results (b) (c) of excitation probability n+ on |u+i as a function of the θ-

g g driving frequency ω and time t, with the initial state at θ0 =

u− u+ π/2 and φ0 = 0. (c) Extracted gµν as a function of θ for the g g measurement time tmeas = 200 ns. Dashed lines in (c) are

g numerical results from full-time-dynamics simulations. The

Quantum metric Quantum modulation amplitude E/ω = 0.1 is fixed in the experiment. 0 0.5 1  the first two quenches, while θ and φ are simultaneously ramping in the third quench. From state tomography, we Figure 2: (Color online) Measuring the quantum metric from transition probability after sudden quench. (a) Three quench can extract the quantum metric at λ0 from the measured + 2 + 2 protocols for extracting gθθ, gφφ, and gθφ (from left to right). transition probability: gθθ ≈ Pθθ/δλ , gφφ ≈ Pφφ/δλ , Measured g as a function of θ for (b) the ground state |u i + + + 2 µν − and gθφ ≈ (Pθφ − Pθθ − Pφφ)/2δλ . In order to simplify and (c) the excited state |u+i. Dashed lines are numerical the state initialization and increase the measurement fi- results from full-time-dynamics simulations. delity, we rotate the frame axis in the experiment to keep the eigenstate of the initial Hamiltonian always in the en- In our experiments, we can simultaneously tune the ergy level |0i [37]. The measured quantum metric gµν as frequency, amplitude, and phase of the microwaves to a function of θ for the ground state |u−i and the excited create arbitrary two-level Hamiltonians. In particular, state |u+i are respectively shown in Fig.2(b) and2(c), we work with two Hamiltonians that can be represented which agree well with the numerical results from full- as a sphere and a torus manifold in parameter space, re- time-dynamics simulations. The obtained ECN from Eq. spectively. First of all, we realize Hexp = H1(θ, φ) in Eq. (4) for |u−i (|u+i) is χ = 1.99 ± 0.04 (χ = 2.01 ± 0.04), (3) by setting the microwave point by point to design the which is close to the theoretical value 2. In order to three parameters as Ωx = Ω sin θ cos φ,Ωy = Ω sin θ sin φ, obtain the full QGT, we also measure the Berry curva- and Ωz = Ω cos θ, where Ω = 10 MHz is set as the energy ture Fθφ using the quasi-adiabatic dynamical response unit. method [17–20, 37, 43], and extract the Chern number Measuring the quantum metric by sudden quench.– We C = 1.05 ± 0.10 (C = 0.96 ± 0.06) for |u−i (|u+i). now describe our experiments to measure the quantum Measuring the quantum metric by periodic drive.– We metric gθθ, gφφ and gθφ by using the sudden quench then demonstrate another method to measure the quan- scheme. The three quench protocols are illustrated in tum metric of the ground state |u−i from excitation rate Fig.2(a). The system is initially prepared at an eigen- under periodic weak drive [32, 37]. The implemented state of the Hamiltonian H1(λ0) in the parameter space three drive protocols for extracting gθθ, gφφ, and gθφ λ = {θ, φ}. Then the Hamiltonian is rapidly swept to are illustrated in Fig.3(a). The system is initially H1(λ0 + δλ), followed bya state tomography to obtain prepared at λ0 = (θ0, φ0), and only the parameter θ the transition probability. In our experiment, we set the (φ) is modulated as θ(t) = θ0 + 2(E/ω) cos(ωt) (with parameter quench λ(t) = λ0 + t/T δλeη along the eη di- θ ↔ φ) to detect gθθ (gφφ) at that point, with frequency rection, where the quench time T = 5 ns [42], δλ = π/16, ω and small modulation amplitude E/ω 1. Under this 4 √ modulation, the system will be excited to |u+i with the late det g for the ground state |uki [37]: probability n+. An example of measured and simulated p 2 3/2 n+(ω, t) as a function of ω and the evolution time t is det g = α |(1 + h cos kx) sin kx|/(2f ) shown in Fig.3(b). In our experiment, we set the mod- 2 2 2 ulation amplitude E/ω = 0.1 and the frequency range with f = (h + cos kx) + α sin kx, which is independent R 2π √ ω ∈ [ωmin, ωmax], where ωmin = 0.5Ω and ωmax = 3.5Ω. of ky. Thus, one can obtain χ = 4 0 det gdkx un- At the measurement time tmeas = 200 ns, we can obtain der the condition {kx, ky} ∈ [0, 2π], while the integration the excitation rate Γ(ω) = n+(ω, tmeas)/tmeas. Based on over kx is taken from 0 to π for the spin chain model the time-dependent perturbation theory [32], the diago- discussed in Ref. [24]. This gives rise to the difference of nal component of the quantum metric gθθ (gφφ) can be χ with a factor 2 between the two cases, which can be in- R ωmax 2 tuitionally understood as the doubling of the monopoles obtained from the equation: gθθ = ω Γ(ω)dω/(2πE ) min in the enlarged state manifold. (θ ↔ φ). Similarly, the off-diagonal component gθφ can be extracted from the excitation rate [32, 37], by combin- (a) 3 det g ing two sets of measurements while simultaneously mod- Experiment Theory ulating the two parameters θ(t) = θ0 + 2(E/ω) cos(ωt)

x 2 and φ(t) = φ0 ± 2(E/ω) cos(ωt). Finally, the measured k quantum metric as a function of θ is shown in Fig.3(c), 1 which agrees with the full-time-dynamics simulation results. The obtained ECN is χ = 2.38 ± 0.30. The un- certainty here is much larger than that of the sudden h h quench. The reason is that for the periodic drive, before (b) evolving the qubit and performing tomography, we can-  not evade the state initialization by rotating the frame axis as in the sudden quench. The imperfection of state preparation due to the qubit control and decoherence sig- nificantly increase the fluctuation. C Topo. number Topo. Topological phase transition characterized by the ECN.– To further show the application of the quan- h tum metric, we explore phase transition characterized by the ECN in our superconducting circuits. By designing Figure 4: (Color online) Characterizing phase transition by the microwave fields on the qubit, we realize the sec- the ECN χ for the simulated Hamiltonian in Eq.√ (6). (a) ond two-level Hamiltonian proposed in Ref. [24] on a Measured (left) and theoretical (right) results of det g as a manifold spanned by the parameters k = (kx, ky) with function of parameters h and kx. (b) The obtained χ and C (the Chern number) as functions of h. Here χ ≈ 4 declines {kx, ky} ∈ [0, 2π]: rapidly to χ ≈ 0 near h = ±1, showing the phase transition, while C ≈ 0 for all h due to the TRS. −iky Ω −h − cos kx α sin kxe Hexp = H2(k) = iky , (6) 2 α sin kxe h + cos kx In our experiment, we first prepare the qubit in the ground state of the simulated Hamiltonian H2(k) by where h is a tunable, dimensionless parameter and α = setting the microwave with the three parameters as Ωx = αΩ sin kx cos ky,Ωy = αΩ sin kx sin ky, and Ωz = 0.5 in our experiment. The Hamiltonian H2(k) can describe a Bloch band in momentum (k) space for spinless Ω(h + cos kx), where Ω = 10 MHz is set as the energy free fermions. It is equivalent to the many-body Hamil- unit. Then, using the sudden-quench protocols, we di- tonian of the XY spin chain after the Jordan-Wigner and rectly√ measure the quantum metric. The measured value Fourier transformations to a (1+1)-dimensional momen- of det g as a function of the parameters kx and h is plot- tum space [24, 44–46], which is spanned by the reduced ted in Fig.4(a) (left), which agrees with the theoretical result (right). The extracted χ as a function of h is shown kx ∈ [0, π] and a local U(1) gauge phase ϕ ∈ [0, 2π] acting in Fig.4(b). It is clear that χ ≈ 4 declines rapidly to as ky. Under the time reversal operator T = K, where χ ≈ 0 near h = ±1, which indicate the phase transitions. K is the complex conjugation, one can find that H2(k) is −1 For comparison, we measure the Berry curvature F(k) TRS since it satisfies the condition T H2(k)T = H2(k). Due to the TRS, the Berry curvature F(k) = −F(−k) from the quasi-adiabatic dynamical response [17–20] and [37], which gives the zero Chern number as the integral obtain the Chern number of F(k) in the torus T 2. Thus, we need an appropriate 1 Z topological number to characterize the phase transition C = F(k)dkxdky ≈ 0 2π T 2 for this case. We demonstrate that the ECN χ acts as such an index. In order to obtain χ in Eq. (4), we calcu- for all h as excepted, which is plotted in Fig.4(b). 5

Conclusion.– In summary, we have demonstrated two Phys. 90, 015001 (2018). methods to measure the quantum metric using a super- [9] D.-W. Zhang, Y.-Q. Zhu, Y. X. Zhao, H. Yan, and S.-L. conducting qubit. We have further explored a topological Zhu, Topological quantum matter with cold atoms, Adv. phase transition characterized by the ECN in a simu- Phys., 67, 253 (2018). [10] D. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. Nightingale, and M. den lated TRS system. The technologies developed here can Nijs, Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two-Dimensional be readily generalized to reveal the geometry and topol- Periodic Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982). ogy of other intriguing quantum states, such as tensor [11] F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Effect with- monopoles [30] and non-Abelian Yang monopoles [15] de- out Landau Levels: Condensed-Matter Realization of the fined in four- and five-dimensional parameter spaces, re- Parity Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988). spectively. Our work provides a novel way to experimen- [12] N. Fläschner, B. S. Rem, M. Tarnowski, D. Vogel, D.-S. tally explore the geometry and topology of the quantum Lühmann,K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Experimen- tal reconstruction of the Berry curvature in a topological states beyond the terminology of the Berry curvature. Bloch band, Science 352, 1091 (2016). The authors thank Q. Liu and G.Xue for technical [13] T. Li, L. Duca, M. Reitter, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, M. support. This work was supported by the National Endres, M. Schleier-Smith, I. Bloch, and U. Schneider, Key Research and Development of China (Grant No. Bloch state tomography using Wilson lines, Science 352, 2016YFA0301800), the National Natural Science Foun- 1094 (2016). dation of China (Grants No. 11604103, No. 11474153, [14] L. Duca, T. Li, M. Reitter, I. Bloch, M. Schleier-Smith, and U. Schneider, An Aharonov-Bohm interferometer No. 91636218, and No. 11890704, No. U1830111 for determining Bloch band topology, Science 347, 288 and No. U1801661), the Natural Science Foundation of (2015). Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2016A030313436), the [15] S. Sugawa, F. Salces-Carcoba, A. R. Perry, Y. Yue, I. B. Key Research and Development Program of Guangdong Spielman, Second Chern number of a quantum-simulated Province (Grant No. 2018B030326001), the Key Pro- non-Abelian Yang monopole, Science 360, 1429 (2018). gram of Science and Technology of Guangzhou (Grant [16] M. Wimmer, H. M. Price, I. Carusotto, and U. Peschel, No. 201804020055), and the Startup Foundation of Experimental measurement of the Berry curvature from anomalous transport, Nat. Phys. 13, 545 (2017). South China Normal University. [17] M. D. Schroer, M. H. Kolodrubetz, W. F. Kindel, M. X. T. and D.-W. Z contributed equally to this work. Sandberg, J. Gao, M. R. Vissers, D. P. Pappas, A. Polkovnikov, and K.W. Lehnert, Measuring a Topolog- Note added: Recently, we became aware that two dif- ical Transition in an Artificial Spin-1/2 System, Phys. ferent experiments have been performed to measure the Rev. Lett. 113, 050402 (2014). quantum metric tensor using an NV center spin in dia- [18] P. Roushan, C. Neill, Y. Chen, M. Kolodrubetz, C. Quin- tana, N. Leung, M. Fang, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Z. mond [47] and a two-dimensional photonic system [48], Chen et al., Observation of topological transitions in in- respectively. teracting quantum circuits, Nature (London) 515, 241 (2014). [19] X. Tan, D.-W. Zhang, Q. Liu, G. Xue, H.-F. Yu, Y.-Q. Zhu, H. Yan, S.-L. Zhu, and Y. Yu, Topological Maxwell Metal Bands in a Superconducting Qutrit, Phys. Rev. ∗ Electronic address: [email protected] Lett. 120, 130503 (2018). † Electronic address: [email protected] [20] X. Tan, Y. X. Zhao, Q. Liu, G. M. Xue, H.-F. Yu, ‡ Electronic address: [email protected] Z. D. Wang, and Y. Yu, Simulation and Manipulation of § Electronic address: [email protected] Tunable Weyl-Semimetal Bands Using Superconducting [1] M. Kolodrubetz, D. Sels, P. Mehta, and A. Polkovnikov, Quantum Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 010501 (2019). Geometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and [21] J. Anandan and Y. Aharonov, Geometry of Quantum classical systems, Phys. Rep. 697, 1 (2017). Evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1697 (1990). [2] J. P. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on [22] Y.-Q. Ma, S. Chen, H. Fan, and W.-M. Liu, Abelian and manifolds of quantum states, Commun. Math. Phys. 76, non-Abelian quantum geometric tensor, Phys. Rev. B 289 (1980). 81, 245129 (2010). [3] D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on [23] A. Rezakhani, D. Abasto, D. Lidar, and P. Zanardi, electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010). Intrinsic geometry of quantum adiabatic evolution and [4] Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Significance of electromag- quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A 82, 012321 netic potentials in the quantum theory, Phys. Rev. 115, (2010). 485 (1959). [24] Y.-Q. Ma, S.-J. Gu, S. Chen, H. Fan, and W.-M. Liu, The [5] M. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic Euler number of Bloch states manifold and the quantum changes, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 392, 45 (1984). phases in gapped fermionic systems EPL, 103, 10008 [6] M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological (2013). insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010). [25] M. Kolodrubetz, V. Gritsev, and A. Polkovnikov, Classi- [7] X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- fying and measuring geometry of a quantum ground state perconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011). manifold, Phys. Rev. B 88, 064304 (2013). [8] N. Armitage, E. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and [26] P. Zanardi, P. Giorda, and M. Cozzini, Information- Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. theoretic differential geometry of quantum phase tran- 6

sitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 100603 (2007). dimensional circuit QED architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett. [27] A. Julku, S. Peotta, T. I. Vanhala, D.-H. Kim, and P. 107, 240501 (2011). Törmä,Geometric origin of superfluidity in the Lieb- [39] D. Riste, J. G. van Leeuwen, H. S. Ku, K. W. Lehnert, Lattice flat band. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 045303 (2016). L. DiCarlo, Initialization by Measurement of a Super- [28] R. Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- conducting Quantum Bit Circuit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, tors. Phys. Rev. B 90, 165139 (2014). 050507 (2012). [29] L.-K. Lim, J.-N. Fuchs, and G. Montambaux, Geome- [40] P. Campagne-Ibarcq, E. Flurin, N. Roch, D. Darson, try of Bloch states probed by Stckelberg interferometry, P. Morfin, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, F. Mallet, Phys. Rev. A 92, 063627 (2015). B. Huard, Persistent Control of a Superconducting Qubit [30] G. Palumbo and N. Goldman, Revealing tensor by Stroboscopic Measurement Feedback. Phys. Rev. X 3, monopoles through quantum-metric measurements. 021008 (2013). Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 170401 (2018). [41] X. Y. Jin et al., Thermal and Residual Excited-State [31] T. Neupert, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Measuring the Population in a 3D Transmon Qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. quantum geometry of Bloch bands with current noise, 114, 240501 (2015). Phys. Rev. B 87, 245103 (2013). [42] By numerical simulations, we have checked that the sud- [32] T. Ozawa and N. Goldman, Extracting the quantum met- den approximation is valid when the quench time T . 10 ric tensor through periodic driving. Phys. Rev. B 97, ns in the quench protocals. In our experiments, we have 201117(R) (2018). confirmed this condition and set T = 5 ns. [33] T. Ozawa, Steady-state Hall response and quantum ge- [43] V. Gritsev, and A. Polkovnikov, Dynamical quantum ometry of driven-dissipative lattices, Phys. Rev. B 97, Hall effect in the parameter space. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 041108(R) (2018). USA, 109, 6457 (2012). [34] O. Bleu, G. Malpuech, Y. Gao, and D. D. Solnyshkov, [44] A. C. M. Carollo and J. K. Pachos,Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, Effective Theory of Nonadiabatic Quantum Evolution 157203 (2005). Based on the Quantum Geometric Tensor, Phys. Rev. [45] S. L. Zhu, Scaling of Geometric Phases Close to the Lett. 121, 020401 (2018). Quantum Phase Transition in the XY Spin Chain, Phys. [35] O. Bleu, D. D. Solnyshkov, and G. Malpuech, Measuring Rev. Lett. 96, 077206 (2006). the quantum geometric tensor in two-dimensional pho- [46] S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge tonic and exciton-polariton systems, Phys. Rev. B 97, University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999). 195422 (2018). [47] M. Yu, P. Yang, M. Gong, Q. Cao, Q. Lu, H. Liu, [36] R. L. Klees, G. Rastelli, J. C. Cuevas, and W. Belzig, Mi- M. B. Plenio, F. Jelezko, T. Ozawa, N. Goldman, S. crowave spectroscopy reveals the quantum geometric ten- Zhang, and J. Cai, Experimental measurement of the sor of topological Josephson matter, arXiv:1810.11277. complete quantum geometry of a solid-state spin system, [37] See Supplemental Material for theoretical and experi- arXiv:1811.12840. mental details. [48] A. Gianfrate, O. Bleu, L. Dominici, V. Ardizzone, M. De [38] H. Paik, D. I. Schuster, L. S. Bishop, G. Kirchmair, Giorgi, D. Ballarini, K. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, D. D. Sol- G. Catelani, A. P. Sears, B. R. Johnson, M. J. Reagor, nyshkov, D. Sanvitto, G. Malpuech, Direct measurement L. Frunzio, L. I. Glazman, S. M. Girvin, M. H. De- of the quantum geometric tensor in a two-dimensional voret, R. J. Schoelkopf, Observation of high coher- continuous medium, arXiv:1901.03219. ence in Josephson junction qubits measured in a three-